""Thomas Larus"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think some people tend to be intimidated by ATM more than by frame relay
> because it is more expensive to get into a home lab and most of us are
less
> likely to have a job configuring ATM on a regular basis than
I just lost a major reply that I had composed due to a computer lockup. So
shorter reply this time.
The static route that your European router has is correct as it is. It takes
all traffic for which it doesn't have an explicit route and passes it out to
the Internet. I'm assuming that the ip addre
the tx/rx loads aren't that great and as it is a t-1 interface the amount of
traffic isn't that great. the thing of interest is the interface
description - link to uuwho. they have been having significant latency
issues. the url may not make it but i posted it below. it describes some
of their
I think some people tend to be intimidated by ATM more than by frame relay
because it is more expensive to get into a home lab and most of us are less
likely to have a job configuring ATM on a regular basis than configuring
frame relay on a regular basis.
Yes, I know you can get ATM in your lab w
You can use sniffer with appropiate POD to tap a
Serial line (PPP, HDLC, Frame, etc). This costs $
though. Theres other vendors with similar products
(agilent, etc).
If your looking to monitor terminal (reverse telnet
like traffic) theres a async monitor command starting
with 12.2(4)T or 8T if I
Chuck,
I agree with you. I worked for FORE Systems doing nothing but ATM to the
desktop for 4 years before moving to a company with all cisco. Not much
harder to understand, as long as you understand basic networking
fundamentals and the fact that these are just 2 different technologies
Hi group,
I am looking for a solution to monitor/sniff the traffic on Serial/Async
ports.
Any suggestions would be appreciated,
Hamid
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54919&t=54919
--
FAQ, list archives, and subs
The information afterwards is not my words. I got it off of
www.examnotes.net. It was written by a guy that frequents their forums who
works in the telecom industry, doing work related to WAN type installations,
including DSL. Here's what he said about the subject:
ADSL. Asymmetric Digital Sub
Here's my config
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply
access-list 101 permit icmp any any source-quench
access-list 101 permit icmp any any unreachable
access-list 101 permit icmp any any time-exceeded
access-list 101 permit tcp any host 192.168.1.2 eq ftp
access-list 101 permit tcp any
The second access-lists statement says to do the action in the route map
with all traffic.
>From what I undertood you do not want that.
> Greetings,
>
> Need help with a route-map question. I need to force all http
traffic
> to go to 10.10.10.141 address, does my config below allow me to
do jus
Part of the complicated image probably harkens back to early ATM
campus applications, pre 100BaseT.
As you mention the configuration of ATM is very similiar to frame
though you need to shape your ATM traffic assuming a non UBR PVC or your
"goodput" will be unacceptable. For whatever reason Cis
Hi,
The router was purchased along with the Cisco firewall software license. I
figured to implement that? Otherwise I could put ISA on the server out there.
The security concerns are duly noted, and I won't leave the office on public
until addressed. That being said; to get them to use their own
Still confused, I'm using access-lists
Here's the example from cisco:
static (inside, outside) 175.1.1.254 192.168.1.2
access-list 101 permit tcp host any host 192.168.1.2 eq ftp
access-group 101 in interface outside
Here's my questions:
I'm using DHCP for my outside address, can I still PAT the
Yes it took care of the issue for this customer, my guess would be
that SNMP is grabbing some large table it doesn't need.
Dave
"bi.s" wrote:
>
> MADMAN wrote:
> > Yes that URL is exactly what I sent to a customer many months ago when
> > they had the same problem. SNMP would request the who
what you have will end up sending ALL traffic to . well to nowhere,
since you have no set statement.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Greetings,
>
> Need help with a route-map question. I need t
Greetings,
Need help with a route-map question. I need to force all http traffic
to go to 10.10.10.141 address, does my config below allow me to do just
that?
access-list extended 101 permit tcp any host 10.10.10.141 eq 80
access-list extended 101 permit ip any any
route-map http_traffic perm
I have 2 Verizon DSL lines, one is 1.5M down/128k up. The second is
768k/768k up and down. They both have dynamic IPs. My question is; Are
these
both ADSL lines? My boss thinkins the one 768k/768k is SDSL. I dont
think it
is, first of all, both lines have the same modem. If the one like was
ADSL,
in line ( like the skates ) below
--
Kerpal.Abdar wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All, I am in need of some help. Can anyone tell me what "drops" mean
when
> I issue a "show interface" on a Cisco router? Is this something bad and
if
> so
> what can
just a quick comment or two.
you are writing as if you need to do something on your routers other than
change the gateway of last resort.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 goes where?
without getting into the intricacies, if you are introducing a new firewall
into the "europe" domain, your router should
You can do it and you will get cumulative points towards a third CCIE
!!!
""Jim Haynes"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I know if you have one CCIE and pass a second one it counts as
> recertifiying, however does this mean you would have to recertify both in
Hey Daren,
For single homed customers, that makes a lot of sense. I suppose I was
speaking more to the situations where a customer my want to dynamically
advertise reachability to their provider(s)
At 04:32 PM 10/4/2002 +, Daren Presbitero wrote:
>What about using default routes at the cu
Hi All, I am in need of some help. Can anyone tell me what "drops" mean when
I issue a "show interface" on a Cisco router? Is this something bad and if
so
what can I do to fix it?
Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is DSCC4 with integrated T1 CSU/DSU
Description: LINK TO UUNET
Greetings all,
I'm playing with QDM 2.1 on a 7200VXR with IOS 12.2(12). When I launch
qdm from my browser (IE 6.0) is takes for every to complete loading, any
ideas?
Thanks...Nabil
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."
Message Posted at:
http://www.group
If you attached the Fluke to a switched port then it will only see network
traffic destined to the device on that port and multicast/broadcast traffic.
It would seem than that your broadcast traffic is 0.8% of your available
bandwidth, 80% of your 1% utilization. That seems reasonable, I'd look
I had this problem several weeks ago. I removed MIB ciscoEntityAssetMIB
from CiscoWorks. Check out CSCdu55091 on CCO.
Or you can configure the following on your routers:
snmp-server view cutdown ciscoEntityAssetMIB excluded
snmp-server community public view cutdown RO
snmp-server communi
"Peter Walker : CISSP, CSS1, CIP wrote:
>
> Gaz wrote:
> >
>
> > I use Windows XP remote desktop to a home PC and connect to
> everything
> > else from there. Bit of a strange set-up, but I use Internet
> Connection
> > sharing on the XP box and all the routers sit behind that.
> > I suppose t
Hello all,
Continuing my quest to unravel that which was left behind, I am now at the
following conclusion:
Europe is on subnet 172.29.30.0
U.S. is on subnet 192.168.100.0
Europe office has a 512k portal to the internet, public IP gateway being
1.2.3.4 (made up of course, is in 217.x.x.x range)
Blair, Philip S wrote:
>
> If you attached the Fluke to a switched port then it will only
> see network
> traffic destined to the device on that port and
> multicast/broadcast traffic.
Very good point. If at all possible, all traffic should be analyzed. More
below...
>
> It would seem than tha
On 6509, you could use 'set security acl ... mac'
The problem is that works only for traffic other than IP/IPX.
For IP you should use 'set security acl ip ...'
Regards,
Alaerte
"r34rv13wm1rr0r" @groupstudy.com em 04/10/2002
13:03:31
Favor responder a "r34rv13wm1rr0r"
Enviado Por:
This thread brings to mind a question I've had for a while.
It appears sometimes that a lot of people think ATM is difficult to
understand, implement, support.
Why is it that?
My ( albeit limited ) exposure to ATM from the customer side is that ATM is
basically every bit as easy to set up and r
Daren Presbitero wrote:
> Couldn't you bridge the VLAN's into an ATM 1483 bridged PVC, point to
> point across the WAN at both ends?
That's how I did it when I had the need.
Regards,
Marco.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f
Ersin Abacioglu wrote:
> I had a similar problem but with our cat 5500's. The CPU would spike to
95%
> utilization every couple of minutes. Before I get into what we did, try
> going under Resource Manager Essentials => Administration => Change Polling
> options => choose the 7000 series routers
MADMAN wrote:
> Yes that URL is exactly what I sent to a customer many months ago when
> they had the same problem. SNMP would request the whole routing table,
> they are receiving the whole Internet routing table, which caused their
> 7200 CPU utilization to max out. There should be no reason t
Try this:
static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.1.2(or IP of your internal
host) 5051 netmask 255.255.255.
255 0 0
-Original Message-
From: NetEng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Confusion [7:54875]
I ha
Couldn't you bridge the VLAN's into an ATM 1483 bridged PVC, point to
point across the WAN at both ends?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
gladston vidali
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Extended Vlan a
I just encountered this problem with 12.1 also on a 2600. The way I got
it to work was by setting the "TFTP_CHECKSUM" variable (I think that's
what it is called) to the value of 0. It worked after this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
C
What about using default routes at the customer sites?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Peter van Oene
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OSPF for ISPs [7:54540]
At 07:12 PM 9/30/2002 +, MADMAN
At 03:12 AM 10/1/2002 +, nrf wrote:
> > >
>
> >
> > I've been involved in Formal International Standards Bodies, where
> > the Camel was developed as a functional specification for a Mouse.
> > The market and the world are far faster than the carriers would like
> > it to be.
>
>Here I must di
Hi Paul,
With this command, will you be able to let's say ftp to the
outside IP and get forwarded to the ftp ports of the internal ip?
Daren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Paul Msava
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 7:28 PM
I'd consider using Policy-Based Routing. This would allow you to
classify traffic based on port number using access lists and then make
routing decisions from class-based rules.
HTH,
John
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 10/4/02
10:02:11 AM >>>
Greetings all,
What features on the IOS can I use to rout
>From Cisco's website:
You can use the fixup command to change the default port assignments or to
enable or disable application inspection for the following protocols and
applications:
a.. FTP
b.. H.323
c.. HTTP
d.. ILS
e.. RSH
f.. RTSP
g.. SIP
h.. SKINNY (SCCP)
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 06:04 PM 9/30/2002 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> >I have an even more fundamental question. ;-) Why does MPLS need a
routing
> >protocol at all? Obviously, the forwarding of traffic doesn't use it.
> >Fo
If all of your networks fall into a single router, what does your routing
protocol do anyway?
At 11:14 PM 9/30/2002 +, you wrote:
>Just thinking what are the best practices to route between vlans. We have 6
>vlans at work, the main reason for multiple vlans is to minimize the impact
>of Broa
policy routing come to mind.
use an extended access-list to identify traffic by tcp port, set up your
route map so that identified traffic is sent either to an interface or an ip
next-hop, then set up the policy inbound on the interface where the traffic
originates.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
l
I'm surprised Howard hasn't chimed in yet, this is definitely a "what
problem are you trying to solve" sort of case...
More details please. Personally, I don't believe VLANs should extend
outside a building (even with Dark Fibre); but perhaps you have
requirements that would justify this...
---
Is there a way on a 6509 to filter a port from seeing a traffic from a cetain
MAC when the two hosts are on the same VLAN. The problem is one host keeps
broadcasting NTP updates every 40 secs and the Pix SYSLOG is contantly
logging
it. Since the NTP host does not go through the firewall I was wo
Greetings all,
What features on the IOS can I use to route based on the port number.
NBAR is one of the services that comes to mind, are there any other
services that allow me to accomplish that?
Thanks...Nabil
"I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."
Messag
It would be great if anyone could give me some insights into if it´s posible
to use the 2610 or a PIX to do what I was talking about
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54878&t=54702
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscript
At 07:12 PM 9/30/2002 +, MADMAN wrote:
>Interesting. I don't work for an ISP bt have worked with many and I
>have only ran into one that ran an IGP with it's customers and I was
>suprised. My ancedotal evidence suggests that the vast majority either
>run BGP or statics to announce customer n
At 06:04 PM 9/30/2002 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>I have an even more fundamental question. ;-) Why does MPLS need a routing
>protocol at all? Obviously, the forwarding of traffic doesn't use it.
>Forwarding is based on the labels. Is it for the label distribution
>component? Couldn't tha
I have a PIX 501 and get a single IP from my ISP. I would like to set up an
FTP conduit, but on port 5051. I can't find any docs on how to do this. When
I play around it it states that I have to change my NAT rules too. I still
want all inside users access outside. Any info or links are appreciate
you're right MED is used for outgoing routing decisions, but...
1.as a optional nontransit path-atribute, it's only important for the
neighboring AS. as such, it determines the neighboring AS outgoing
decisions, not our own AS ones.
e.g if you change MEDs in our routing updates, it causes change
At 04:05 PM 9/30/2002 +, Chris Headings wrote:
>Great...
>
>So it looks like I would then use the "redistribute static subnets" as well
>as the "redistribute connected subnets" command within the OSPF process to
>make sure ALL ospf enabled routers would know how to reach that specifc,
>statica
At 03:07 PM 9/30/2002 +, Russell Heilling wrote:
> > Say, for example, that a customer has a small block of IP's and a
> > distribution router knows where that block is, via a connected route,
like
>a
> > /30 on a serial link. But later down the line the customer requests an
> > additional bl
I encountered something similar with IOS 12.1.10 enterprise on the 2500
series. I reported it to Cisco and posted something on the list here a month
or two back.
There is a bug in some of the 12.1 codes.
""Andrew Larkins"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
I had a similar problem but with our cat 5500's. The CPU would spike to 95%
utilization every couple of minutes. Before I get into what we did, try
going under Resource Manager Essentials => Administration => Change Polling
options => choose the 7000 series routers and try to manipulate some of
I had the same problem before...it had to do with ATA flash disk and
ciscoFlashMIB
check here for the work around.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/477/SNMP/ipsnmphighcpu.shtml
- Original Message -
From: "bi.s"
To:
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:25 PM
Subject: CiscoWorks2000 and snm
Yes that URL is exactly what I sent to a customer many months ago when
they had the same problem. SNMP would request the whole routing table,
they are receiving the whole Internet routing table, which caused their
7200 CPU utilization to max out. There should be no reason the grab
this table via
Well if you must you can try NAT on a stick:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/nat-on-stick.html
Had a customer that wanted to do this last week. Tried it in the lab
but couldn't get it to work though I was sure the config was correct.
After talking with a few Cisco engineers we found out
Hi Guys,
Could you give me your opinion about the following ?
What is the best technology nowadays to extend Vlans across a ATM Wan
backbone ?
--
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
hi,
i am interested if there is someone using cw2k and has c7200 vxr with
npe-400.
do you have problems with snmp on the routers? on other routers?
it looks like there is a problem with snmp causing high cpu on routers
and bringing the network down.
has someone this problems? how did you solve
I had that question same question when I was working on my CCNP. Per Cisco,
I was allowed to mix the 50x and 60x exams. I would think the situation
would be the same for future test upgrades.
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Rocha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03,
i think they're two different processes. the PPS is the direct amount of
calculations it can do and the GBPS would be the bandwidth. so if you had
18Mpps and 24GBPS, and you tried to switch 18M packets all of MTU (1500)
it would be 1800 * 1500 = 270 or 27GBPS so you exceed the
bandwidt
What tftp server are you using? I have run into the same problem, but only
when I was using an older tftp daemon on a SunOS box. Try running a tftp
server on your machine and directly connecting to the router with a
crossover and see if there is any change.
Andrew Cook
""Andrew Larkins"" wrot
Hi Dave,
Just a brief comment to make on implementing BVI on Cisco Routers. From what
I have experienced in the past, BVI does indeed actually eat up quite a lot
of Router CPU.
One thing that I would really suggest is to look into using RBE instead of
BVI. This will definetely result in less CPU
Hi...
Recently we found that LAN is getting slower and I used Fluke One Touch
Network Assistant to check the health of network. And it gave me the
following.
Utilization 1%
Error 0 %
Collision 0%
Broadcast 80 %
IP 48%
Station >250 %
Do you think the fluke output indicate that ou
Hello everybody,
I have the Sybex CCNA Virtual Lab e-trainer,CCNA Ebook,CCNP,CCIE,CCDA,cisco
press EBook,& Cisco Etrainer PPTs,lots more.It retails but
I am very flexible and willing to trade if you need any of those items. Good
luck to everyone.Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sandip Banerjee
CCNP
Hello everybody,
I have the Sybex CCNA Virtual Lab e-trainer,CCNA Ebook,CCNP,CCIE,CCDA,cisco
press EBook,& Cisco Etrainer PPT,lots more.It retails but
I am very flexible and willing to trade if you need any of those items. Good
luck to everyone.
Sandip Banerjee
CCNP
Message Posted at:
http:/
Gaz wrote:
>
> I use Windows XP remote desktop to a home PC and connect to everything
> else from there. Bit of a strange set-up, but I use Internet Connection
> sharing on the XP box and all the routers sit behind that.
> I suppose the security may not be wonderful??
No it isnt unless you ha
Hi all,
I was upgrading some 2600's yesterday with new flash and DRAM.
The router boots up into rommon mode correctly. All the TFTP variables are
then set and the code uploaded. Problem is that when the code is finished I
get an error about invalid checksum. Downloaded some new code and same
res
70 matches
Mail list logo
