Ed,
Make sure that you use a straight-thru cable for console not a regular
roll-over.
Good luck,
TuDo.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63686t=63681
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
You are using a straight thru cable ?
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: Edwin R. Gonzalez
To:
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:12 PM
Subject: HELP!!! [7:63681]
I just got a SUP III (WS-X5530-E3) for my Cat 5005,
all the light come up green
Larry,
Yah, since you are connecting terminal to console of a SUP III (not I or II)
you need straight-thru (not a regular silver roll-over).
This link tells you.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/627/5000/hw_conn.htm
Cheers,
Tu Do.
Message Posted at:
Thanks for the info..
--
_
The harder you work, the luckier you get!
_
The only place success comes before
work is in the dictionary!!!
_
tu do wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Larry,
Yah,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Edwin R. Gonzalez wrote:
I just got a SUP III (WS-X5530-E3) for my Cat 5005,
all the light come up green but I can not get a prompt.
I check the cable and everything else.I tried getting a prompt
on one of my other switches using the same set up and I get a prompt.
I
You can clear the config, re-cycle and put it back on the right domain.
Your config rev. should be 0
From: John Brandis
Reply-To: John Brandis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: adding new switch to VTP domain [7:63654]
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:32:30 GMT
Hi All,
Tommorrow I will be adding a
Hi Guys
Need Help in Policy Routing. I have a Cisco 2610 router with Pix behind, The
2610 has two WAN Connections, S0-256Kbps leased line and ATM0-DSL line
512Kbps, going to two differenct ISP, with different IP addresses.E0 will
connect to PIX outside interface,
I need to configure SMTP Traffic
Hi there,
AH wont work with NATAH does a digest copmutation on the entire IP
packet, including dest / src IP's. When this passes through NAT, the IP
header changes, and thus the apcket will be dropped.
BJ Rice wrote:
To clarify, my PIX sits behind a DSL modem, not router.
Message
Depends on what you are trying to do and what your budget is. You could
always make use of commercial software such as NetCool (Micromuse etc), or
just have a good old syslog server, and configure the pix / checkpoint etc,
to log to the syslog using the same facility. This would merge all the
fahim wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Guys
Need Help in Policy Routing. I have a Cisco 2610 router with Pix behind,
The
2610 has two WAN Connections, S0-256Kbps leased line and ATM0-DSL line
512Kbps, going to two differenct ISP, with different IP addresses.E0 will
connect to PIX
Dear Fahim
Here
Define The traffic for policy routing:
access-list 150 tcp any any eq smtp
Then Make a Route-map policy
route-map permit
match ip address 150
set ip next-hop
Now assign it to some interface:
Interface configuration modeip policy
was reminded again tonight, in answering a question posted here.
there may be several ways to do something. more importantly, there may be
several ways to propagate routes.
or at least to assure that reachability occurs.
my thanks to PC, whose post earlier today got me to rethink something I
And if you are even more paranoid like I am, you can ensure that your
original VTP domain is password proteceted, that way if you in forget to
reset the version counter of your new switch, it wont automatically del
all the existing info. I also tend to alway add new switched as client and
then
By the sounds of your email, it appears as though you where able to connect,
but have since connected and abnormally exited .. Use the command show
sessions to list all the open connections. Then you can use the command
disconnect to disconnect whatever session you want.
To prevent this sort of
Tu Do
It was not my post originally, I offered the postee the same
advice that you have...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: tu do
To:
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: HELP!!! [7:63681]
Larry,
Yah, since you are
hi, I am trying evaluating the Microsoft MOM Microsoft Operation Manager,
wonder if anybody has got advice or feedback on the software. would
appreciate if someone using it is able to shed some light on site or book
that cover great detail on the usage and administrating of the MOM
Message
You can do this with route maps,
A search on google for route map cisco gave the first result as:
! Enable policy routing
interface Ethernet0
ip policy route-map proxy-redirect
! Route to proxy server
route-map proxy-redirect permit 10
match ip address 110
set ip next-hop 10.11.12.13
!
Hi all ...
I am not too hot on CatOS at all, hence the following question ..
Can I apply an IP address either to a FastEthernet port or to a VLAN ??? and
if so .. how ..
I have and am continuing to browse the Cisco website without any luck ...
Kind regards
Doyley ...
Message Posted at:
Hi All,
Can the set spantree port-fast solve this issue?
Steiven
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Strange problem with a 2924XL. [7:63680]
Ken Diliberto wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had
Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox) wrote:
Can the set spantree port-fast solve this issue?
No. But like the previous poster implied, is storm control enabled on
that port? That would explain it. If it's not, I can't really explain it.
Regards,
Marco.
Hi all
I am looking for some insightes into a MAN desigin spanning a city using
Fiber Gigabit Ethernet Links.
What I am realy looking for are comments about the pros and cons of a Ring
design vs. the standard Core-Dist.-Acces. design with redundant paths from
the dist to the core.
any thoughts
Hi
I'm waiting like you also for the only book that exit but not yet published
Ms Operations Manager
Amaris
ISBN: 0672323761
But you can see this link in Microsoft web site
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn
ol/mom/maintain/operate/opsguide/default.asp
In a Core-Distribution-Access Layer design, would you keep the Core L2 or
with high end L2/L3 switches such as the Cat6500 do you think it would be
better to do L3 in the core ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63708t=63708
Hi Doyley ...
What are you trying to achieve, by the sounds of it you want to set an ip
address for the Cat so you can telnet to it? This is done my setting the
sc0 interface on the catOS.
Eg. (CatOS)
set int sc0
If you want to set IP's for the actual VLAN interfaces you need to do this
on
It depends if you are after theoritical advice, or practical advice. I have
found it rare to have only L2 in the core (other than when using MPLS). The
focus of the exam is that the core should add minimum latency to forwarding
decisions, and thus the empahsis on why ACL's, VLAN aggregation etc,
I want to connect my branch office with my head office (1.5Km) away via ADSL
without any external service provider.
Two copper wires are laid physically from the Head Office to the Branch
office.
Is this design going to achieve my goal?
Clients PC--Ethernet--837 ADSL-pair of copper
I would think that you would have to use the 828 G.SHDSL Router, not an 837
ADSL, as an ADSL connection requires an DSLAM to connect to, but the G.SHDSL
is for point to point
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63712t=63711
Ismail,
It does not look possible. Where are you getting the signalling, timing and
IP addresses from?
If you can build it on your test bench with just a pair of wires, best of
luck.
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Ismail Al-Shelh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
At 11:05 AM 2/25/2003 +, Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
In a Core-Distribution-Access Layer design, would you keep the Core L2 or
with high end L2/L3 switches such as the Cat6500 do you think it would be
better to do L3 in the core ?
I personally haven't found the need to have a Distribution
Hello i networks 192.17.73.0 - 192.17.77.0
is there anyway to deny these networks with one entry in an access list?
such as deny 192.17.73.0 0.0.248.255?
is this going to deny these networks? it's also going to black hole several
other networks though. Or does the list have to be
deny
At 11:44 AM + 2/25/03, Troy Leliard wrote:
It depends if you are after theoritical advice, or practical advice. I have
found it rare to have only L2 in the core (other than when using MPLS). The
focus of the exam is that the core should add minimum latency to forwarding
decisions, and thus
I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip?
What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But
when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the interface,
although the interface is showed on the result of show ip protocol.
R1:
inter
Any experience to share on the following problem?
The CAM entries are changing continuously. There are not so many users
turning off their computers. Also, on two interfaces of a Catalyst 6509,
every 1 minute and 30 seconds there are a unexpected traffic that seems to
be Flooding (got with
With CQ you can reserve 20% for each class of traffic.
As far as I remember, if one class do not have traffic, the router will not
lose time serving this queue, so it will go back, faster, to the other
queue.
Also, this treatment will occur in case of congestion. With this approach
there is no
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any experience to share on the following problem?
The CAM entries are changing continuously. There are not so many users
turning off their computers. Also, on two interfaces of a Catalyst 6509,
every 1 minute and 30 seconds there are a unexpected
alaerte Vidali wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip?
What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But
when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the
interface,
although the
I read the mc3810 is a cheap alternative for ATM home lab, using the
MFT-T1/E1. I know I can do back-to-back but it only support PVC. I would
prefer it also support SVC. However, I can't find any ATM switch (Ebay)
which support T1/E1. Am I missing anything?
Regards,
Victor
Message Posted
the first access-list will not work.
The second one will also deny networks 192.17.72.0 and 78.0 as well as 79.0
-
You are correct about zeros must make at 1's are don't care, but you need to
understand the basic of subnetting. A 248.0 subnet mask means 8 Class C
subnets. You have to start at a
I ASSume you mean PA's not VIPs ;)
What is the part number of the two PA's? Some PA's that play well
with VIPs need a differant HW revision in order to work on a 7200.
Other than that you should be able to do OIR but it wouldn't be the
first time I have seen OIR not work:(
Dave
I think I have to refine my question to be clearer
Again
I want to connect my branch office with my head office (1.5Km) away via DSL
without any external service provider (phone company).
Two dry copper wires are laid physically from the Head Office to the Branch
office.
Is this design going
Actually from my point of view I was talking about private data
circuits. The company I used to work for provided customers with credit
card processing. We ahd a customer in Manhatten that for months after
9-11 got dropped on there butts because Verison was cleaning up there
switches (data
Check whether or not your 7206 is VXR. If so, then check to see if the Port
Adapters are VXR compatible.
-Original Message-
From: Arnold, Jamie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 8:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 7206 adding VIP cards [7:63673]
I have
Here's more information I should have included in the first message:
#sh int f0/13
FastEthernet0/13 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 00d0.bbd2.260d (bia
00d0.bbd2.260d)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload
Hi all,
We have a 1Mb kilostream between our two offices connected via the
serial interface on two Cisco 1720s, is there anyway I can see how much
of the 1Mb is being used, what % of time it is using all of the line
etc.
Thanks
Stu
Message Posted at:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63728t=63728
Can someone who is good in designing to help in the designing together an
ISP, pls email me your phone # I will call and give you the details.
email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63730t=63730
In a pratical world it all comes down to your needs for your business and
the money you want to spend. We use a collapsed core with 2 4006 with
Supervisor III's doing the layer 3 functions. We could add a high
performance layer 2 switch for the core but it would be overkill.
-Original
Hi Ken,
What is connecting to this interface...you may want to manually configure
the duplex and speed settings on this interface to match that of the device
that is connecting to it. Also be very wary if you have a hub connected.!!!
Let me know if this helps !
Troy
Ken Diliberto wrote:
AH does work fine behind NAT, otherwise no one could ever run VPNs behind a
firewall. I can run a VPN from behind my PIX with the following ACLs:
access-list VPN permit ah any any
access-list VPN permit esp any any
access-list VPN permit udp any any eq isakmp
Still, my question remains, is
Hello, I am trying to understand route redistribution from ospf to rip
using tags. This example is taken from CCO:
With the following configuration, OSPF external routes with tags 1, 2, 3,
and 5 are redistributed into RIP with metrics of 1, 1, 5, and 5,
respectively. The OSPF routes with a tag of
Hi Stuart,
One of the easiest ways to gather this sort of info is to use something like
MRTG (or even better Cricket, using RRD Tool). These free programs
periodically gather stats from the router and store it. You can then query
this data and it would draw nice pretty graphs showing you exact
What you want to do is possibleinfact I demo'd something similar. I
used the MXL-2300 from tut systems ...
http://www.tutsys.com/mtu/products/ethernetworking/mxl_2300/index.cfm
at anything under 3.5km you can get about 2MB. I haven't tried it this
using any cisco kit,
Ismail Al-Shelh
I think you will find that AH cannot be used with NAT. AH does a has on the
entire packet, including IP SRC and DST, and NAT would modify this thus
invalidatin the packet!. For VPN's that are behind a NAT device, be it a
firewall, router or what ever, the transport mechanism would be ESP, or
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2 (Multilayer Switch Feature Card 2) is one of
the
Hi, I was told that there is a flash memory pcmcia card for the 2501's which
can be used to upgrade the flash. I wasn't aware that there the 2501's
supported these cards. A search on cisco's website indicates that indeed
there are flash memory cards but what I do not understand is why would it be
Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
In a Core-Distribution-Access Layer design, would you keep the
Core L2 or with high end L2/L3 switches such as the Cat6500 do
you think it would be better to do L3 in the core ?
It's best to always keep in mind where data jumps layers and then mentally
follow
Check the device that is connected to the port for speed setting and duplex.
If possible fix it to one particular setting at both ends. Start low and
then build up to 100 full. The errors are usually caused by a mismatch or
cabling that cannot handle it.
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
Is CBAC covered on the RS lab?
Or just dynamic, reflective, standard, and extended ACL's?
CBAC seems like it would be more of a CCIE security topic.
Just curious
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63745t=63745
Hi
When using vlan trunking from a router, for example in a router on a stick
enviroment, I would create subinterfaces on the ethernet interface on the
router, does that in some way limit the use of access-lista to controle
traffic, like traffic between the vlans and out of the router through
At 03:54 PM 2/25/2003 +, DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
Bridging is a layer two function,
I have 4 2500 series routers and not a one of them has a pcmcia slot on it.I
know the 16xx routers use pcmcia falsh cards but I have yet to see a 2500
with a pcmcia slot.
HTH
Don K.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63747t=63741
Keep in ming that the CAM aging time is only 5 minutes so seeing some
fluctuation does not seem to be unreasonable. The broadcast every 90
seconds is surley unrelated and since you caught it on a sniffer you
should be able to se what it is.
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any experience to
No.
If there is availabe bandw over the guaranteed bandw
that is used, I want to assign it with priority to
class A. If class A doesn-t need the bandw then to
class B and so on.
CQ assigns the remaining band to all the traffic
patterns (it can not use priorities, as far as I know)
It must be a
Couldn't you just use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255 to deny 192.17.73.0 -
192.17.77.0? I used the Boson wildcard mask calculator to check this, and
it gave me those networks.
Andrew Larkins wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the first access-list will not work.
The second one will also
Search for MRTG in google
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 February 2003 15:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Performance monitoring [7:63729]
Hi all,
We have a 1Mb kilostream between our two offices connected via the
serial interface on
According to Cisco:
Layer 3 switching refers to a class of high-performance switch routers
optimized for the campus LAN or intranet, providing wirespeed Ethernet
routing and switching services.
Compared to other routers, Layer 3 switch routers process more packets
faster by using
There are two scenario's discussed here, and I am sure I'll
be corrected by everyone...
Multi layer switching version means that the first packet in
a flow of data will be routed the usual way
in the ios software, then the rest of the packets in the
flow will be hardware switched from L2 port
Switching is the function of directing frames or packets from one port or
interface to another. A layer 3 switch, switches packets at wire speed
using ASICs. An example would be the 8500 series.
From: DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
Reply-To: DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: L3
Steven Aiello wrote:
I have been readibng through the boards and from what I've seen
the new
CCNP Routing exam seems to be a bear. This is the next test I
am
studying for. Any one out there that have passed the test,
that can
give me a generally study out line? Also what books or test
Certain models of 2501 have a PCMCIA slot inside the case. I have never
tried to use it, though, and I do not know what it's for. I have always
assumed that it was just a holdover from some older implementation and Cisco
just kept using those boards until the supplies ran out. But I don't know
More or less in one word, marketing!!
Dave
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
--
David
At 3:54 PM + 2/25/03, DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote:
I am under the impression that switching is a layer 2 function and that
routing is a layer 3 function. I have seen several discussions talking
about layer 3 switching. Could someone explain this to me?
The bottom line is that layer 3
Don
You may want to take the cover off of the 2500s and have a look at the
front right hand side of the motherboard. There is definitely something
there that looks like a pcmcia slot. I dont know anything more than that,
if it works, how it is used, but it is definitely there :-)
Regards
I know that when the WIC-1ADSL cards first came out they had some
problems playing well with others, but that was many months ago and I'm
considering these again. I have a few of them lying around but we never
implemented them.
Anyone here running a recent release of 12.2T with these cards? If
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in
one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works
is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route
processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2 (Multilayer Switch
My salesman said look for Sniffer Pro 4.8 sometime in the June time frame.
It is reported to run fine on Win XP.
Patrick
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63763t=63588
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
At 4:46 PM + 2/25/03, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform.
It isn't the best of both worlds, because raw forwarding speed is
frequently not the constraint on real-world network design. From a
cost standpoint, it would be
Don Kanicki wrote:
I have 4 2500 series routers and not a one of them has a pcmcia slot on
it.I
know the 16xx routers use pcmcia falsh cards but I have yet to see a 2500
with a pcmcia slot.
and you never will...
Dave
HTH
Don K.
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Open the case and you will see it
-Original Message-
From: Don Kanicki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 February 2003 17:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: pcmcia flash memory card for 2501 [7:63741]
I have 4 2500 series routers and not a one of them has a pcmcia slot on
it.I know
Jason Steig wrote:
so you're saying that my statement
ip access-list 1 permit ip 192.17.73.0 0.191.251.0 will permit
all hosts from network 192.17.73.0 and 192.81.73.0??
17 is 00010001
81 is 01010001
You corrected my typo on 81. That's good. :-)
so the bit it doesn't match on is
I'm currently experiencing an oddity with multicast traffic like HSRP that
I'm looking for some ideas on. For simplicity the network design consists
of 2 Cisco 3640 routers running HSRP between them connected to a single
Extreme [Black Diamond] switch. Basically...
extreme switch
Charles,
Regarding the meaning of the term switch, let me quote a few lines from
my favorite Net Goddess, Radia Perlman. She wrote the DEC STP protocol and
has been very active in protocol development since day one. In her book,
Interconnections, she says the following:
One cynical (and
I replied earlier, but it didn't seem to come through. Anyway, you should
use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255. That will match the addresses
192.17.73.0 - 192.172.77.255, which I think is what you want. In case you
don't already have it, download Boson's free wildcard mask calculator at the
(Embedded image (Embedded image moved to file: pic16972.pcx)
moved to file:ALAERTE GLADSTON VIDALI ALAERTE
pic06654.pcx) (Embedded image moved to file: pic14369.pcx)
25/02/2003 12:10:42
(Embedded image
No, subinterfaces on a trunked port fully support acl's in the same
manner as physical interfaces. Same for other services such as NAT,
CBAC, policy routing, etc.
HTH,
Kent
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 11:47, Skarphedinsson Arni V. wrote:
Hi
When using vlan trunking from a router, for example in
I have been readibng through the boards and from what I've seen the new
CCNP Routing exam seems to be a bear. This is the next test I am
studying for. Any one out there that have passed the test, that can
give me a generally study out line? Also what books or test prep did
you use.
You
It is clear now that the every 1 minute and 30 seconds unexpected traffic
is a strange 'normal' communication between two servers. Could check it
with Sniffer.
MADMAN @groupstudy.com em 25/02/2003 14:15:17
Favor responder a MADMAN
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL
I am curious why ciscopress.com lists Priscilla's book under the CCDA
certification when I see so many comments that it is one of, if not the best
book to prepare for CCDP. Even in the CCDA section it is listed last. Now
that I successfully recertified my CCNP I was planning on buying this book
FYI
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Systems Inc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:53 PM
Cisco Systems would like to inform you on the latest news and
developments from the Cisco Internet Learning Solutions Group.
Please read below about revisions to
Cisco Systems would like to inform you on the latest news and
developments from the Cisco Internet Learning Solutions Group.
Please read below about revisions to certification and
recertification, Cisco Qualified Specialist retirements and
new courses.
The decision to send to the RP isn't really based on the VLAN is it??
I believe that the decision to send to the Routing Processor (RP) is indeed
based on the VLAN. When a host wishes to communicate with another host, the
IP on the host determines if the host is on the same subnet or not. If
Steven,
I recently took the BSCI exam to satisfy a Partner RS Specialization
requirement. It is very doable. Best study source to my mind is Jeff
Doyle's book: Routing TCP/IP Volumes 1 and 2. Boson is good for practice
exams.
Just my 2 cents,
-Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, MCSE
Senior Network
I replied too and it wasn't posted. That is SO annoying. I'm tempted to
never post again.
Anyway, your answer is wrong because it doesn't catch 74, 75, and 76, and he
said he wanted a range.
You have to use 0.0.7.255, which has an unfortunate (but unavoidable) side
effect of catching 72, and 78
It's the BSCI (Building Scalable Cisco Internetworks) exam - 640-901. I
took it about three weeks ago. It was tough for me but then I don't get as
much real-world hands on experience with routing protocols and such as I'd
like.
For info check here:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Couldn't you just use the wildcard mask 0.0.4.255 to deny
192.17.73.0 -
192.17.77.0? I used the Boson wildcard mask calculator to
check this, and
it gave me those networks.
If the mask is 0.0.4.255, it will deny 192.17.73.0 as well as 192.17.77.0.
However, it won't
I haven't had any issues with IOS; my issues have been with the cards
themselves. In one case, after replacing the WIC-1ADSL 2 times, I was
finally able to get a good WIC-1ADSL card that didn't have some kind of
hardware issue. TAC said they didn't have any cases of bad cards, but
the reseller I
May I suggest people consult RFC 1812 and
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/forces-charter.html
before going off into marketing definitions of switching?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63781t=63728
--
FAQ, list
At 04:08 PM 2/25/2003 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a pratical world it all comes down to your needs for your business and
the money you want to spend. We use a collapsed core with 2 4006 with
Supervisor III's doing the layer 3 functions. We could add a high
performance layer 2 switch for
At 04:46 PM 2/25/2003 +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Layer 3 switching combines the best of switching and routing in one
platform. The main advantage here is speed. The way it works is, in a
switch you have some kind of layer 3 routing engine (aka route processor, or
RP). For example, the MSFC2
You might want to look up the following document on CCO:
Avoiding HSRP Instability in a Switching Environment with Various Routing
Platforms.
Looks like www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/8.shtml
-Original Message-
From: John Starta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25,
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
