Hi Symon, Selcuk & other Cisco Buddies
thnx for your reply.
Actually we are getting logs for activities such as Status of Link , when I
change some route config .
PLS LET ME KNOW :
1. To wht extent of details can I get from router if I enable syslogging
2. If I enable Syslog , can I get detail
This is a notice of equipment available on that well known auction site.
Ignore if you are not interested in acquiring routers for your study.
package of three 2502 token rings routers, with 16/16, IOS 12.1.5, 2 each of
serial cables, TR media filters, and TR MAU's
great way to start out your
been fooling around with the B-Link 2 that a particular someone ( whose name
is not supposed to be mentioned here on this list ) sells at what seems to
be a reasonable price.
not looking for specific answers - just a general question - ever get both B
channels to come up? just a yes or no.
( ISDN
you know the one. you're working with subnets of a classful network. let's
say 10.0.0.0. you enter the command ip default-network 10.1.1.0 and what
shows up in the running config is ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.0.
Then try as you might, the command no ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.0
doe
Hi all,
I have an interesting problem:
I am running an snmp monitor to check devices in a network behind a
firewall. SNMP traps seem to work ok (port 162). When, however, I try to
poll an object (I have a VPN to the network by the way to access the
internal addresses, but the devices must respond
This may be a stupid question, but after searching Cisco's site and the
groupstudy archives for an answer, and not finding anything, I figured I'd
ask. What command will allow me to change the default management vlan from
vlan 1 to any other vlan?? I also understand this will negatively affect
othe
Hi All,
Can anyone show me a few links to some good QoS, MPLS practice labs?
Thanks in advance.
Xy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64810&t=64810
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.
Looks like you have an NSAP incorrect.
470001000100010001000100001110111000 s): SETUPv2 ci: 0xF3 mp: 0 ei:
0x
04:02:04: ATMSIG: Called len 20
04:02:04: ATMSIG: Calling len 20
04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:0) build Setup msg,
Null(U0)
state
04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0
Scratch that.
If I would have read further down, I would have found my answer.
Sorry. :)
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
"Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals."
- Original Message -
From: "John Tafasi"
To:
My first question would be, is your LS100 configured for routing NSAP
addresses?
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
"Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals."
- Original Message -
From: "John Tafasi"
To: "Cisco Grou
The issue has gone away as per my last email. I think that maybe the NIC
tuning fixed it. I did replace a squashed UTP cable, but if that was
causing problems I would have expected to see some Ethernet faults
during my packet sniffing session.
I really don't like it when there is no black and whit
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate) wrote:
> I went to Justin's link and followed a few more and found this:
> http://lsr.internet2.edu/
> That link not only has the original text that the news article quoted, but
> it explains that this is a contest and gives the rules for t
Hey Chuck,
How did that big design go, the one you mentioned on the list a few
months ago?
Symon
-Original Message-
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2003 20:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: network design [7:64422]
""Scott Roberts"" wrote
personally, i've had very good luck with vendor designs. in particular
if you have some inkling about what your requirements are and the
rudiments of a solution set in mind. if you know enough about a
solution to intelligently pose questions and negotiate features/costs
tradeoffs then you can
Scott Terminiello wrote:
>
> It was my understanding that EIGRP only notifies its neighbors
> of topology
> changes the same way OSPF works. This is in contrast to RIP
> which sends out
> an update at specified intervals (30 secs for RIPv1) regardless
> of whether a
> topology change or not.
Tha
Hi,
actually it is Eigrp that has a better AD than Igrp, 90 and 100,
respectively, the route u see in ur table has 170 as the AD, therefore
External EIGRP,caused by the implicit redistribution, imposed when using
these routing protocols with the same AS.
so u are having normal behavior of the proto
Im trying to redirect telnet traffic from the pix to my Cisco 2511 terminal
server so I can access the devices over the internet.
I checked the previous post and tried to configure the Pix. However the
traffic gets denied according to my syslog server.
Any help will be appreciated.
JB
Im trying to redirect telnet traffic from the pix to my Cisco 2511
terminal server so I can access the devices over the internet.
I checked the previous post and tried to configure the Pix. However the
traffic gets denied according to my syslog server.
Any help will be appreciated.
JB
PC-
Im trying to redirect telnet traffic from the pix to my Cisco 2511
terminal server so I can access the devices over the internet.
I checked the previous post and tried to configure the Pix. However the
traffic gets denied according to my syslog server.
Any help will be appreciated.
JB
PC-
Here is the SLAC webpage with more details:
http://www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/lsr/
Justin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Intenet Speed Re
Hey all,
I went to Justin's link and followed a few more and found this:
http://lsr.internet2.edu/
That link not only has the original text that the news article quoted, but
it explains that this is a contest and gives the rules for the contest. I
will leave it to the greater minds in the
It was my understanding that EIGRP only notifies its neighbors of topology
changes the same way OSPF works. This is in contrast to RIP which sends out
an update at specified intervals (30 secs for RIPv1) regardless of whether a
topology change or not.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Jo
try putting more memory in, the max i think is 24, but default is like 12.
ios 12.0 requires 8MB, so you're only really working with 4MB.
scott
""Hyman, Craig"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ALL-
>
> I am having a problem with Dynamic Natting using a 1601R router over Frame
> Relay.
Sure, here you go:
http://news.excite.com/tech/article/id/160874|technology|03-07-2003::19:44|r
euters.html
""Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> John,
> Would you mind posting a link to the article? I'm curious.
> Thanks!
> Geoff Mossburg
>
> -Origin
""Troy Leliard"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Could be that you have directed broadcast enabled.
I checked after I got your post: No, directed broadcast is disabled.
Thanks,
Geoff Mossburg
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64805&t=64570
John,
Would you mind posting a link to the article? I'm curious.
Thanks!
Geoff Mossburg
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intenet Speed Record: What am I missing? [7:64767]
Here's
Actually, the application they used was straight tcp. You can get it at
http://www.cnd.gatech.edu/rapid/.
Again, I think the message is that this was done over a switched network,
and they did this over a 196msec, 6 hop path.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
hi,
performance will suffer, from the simple fact that the router will have to
drilldown the lists, there is a turbo ACL that betters this,i have not heard
of an actual limitation, ur memory will limit u obviousely.
Regards, Amar.
""Lo Ching"" a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> I suspect that they ignored the control issues. :-) If they used
FTP/TCP/IP,
> they probably started measuring after the control and data 3-way handshakes
> and set the TCP window as huge as possible??
>
> They probably rolled their own transfer m
hi,
"Commited Access Rate" would do the trick for u.
Regards, Amar.
""Troy Leliard"" a icrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You could use some form of policy routing !
>
>
> Stuart Pittwood wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to limit the amount of bandwidth used for
> > traffic sent
> >
Thanks Scott! To synthesize:
The original question was whether efficiency would be improved if Cisco HDLC
were used instead of PPP. Most of us said "no," which is correct, (taking
efficiency to mean header overhead.)
A few of us added the caveat that a Cisco HDLC header/trailer maybe has a
couple
Tried sending this through the news server, but it didn't like it... trying
again...
> this might seem like a dumb question, but are there vlans or even hosts
with
> the paticular address?
If you mean, "Do the VLANs actually have those addresses assigned to them?"
and/or "Are there any other host
Hello..
Anyone out there in intense networking land know of any network security
newsgroups just as good as this? Thanks for the input.
Regards,
Jason
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64796&t=64796
--
FAQ, list
That is true but that behavior is not specific to link state protocols.
I've already deleted the earlier posts from this thread but I believe it
was Peter Van Oene (and maybe someone else) who explained
the technical differences between DV and LS operations.
If you don't have that message any
s vermill wrote:
>
> John Neiberger wrote:
What you're missing is the cluelessness of news reporters and the public
maybe...
> >
> > Here's a quote from something I just saw in the news:
> >
> > "Scientists at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center used
> > fiber-optic
> > cables to transfer 6
I have created Etherchannel on Cisco 3524 between port 1-2, 3-4, and 5-6 and
they are connected to 3 Dell Servers. Server 1 (Dual Nic) connected to port
1-2 Server 2 (Dual Nic) connected to port 3-4 Server 3 (Dual Nic) connected
to port 5-6 The problem is after a few minutes, the 3 servers would lo
Please note the "sscop open unsuccessful" in the output of the debug atm
sig-all command below:
r6(config)#int atm0
r6(config-if)#shut
r6(config-if)#
04:04:40: ATMSIG-IF:atmSig_clearAllSvc: Port ID : ATM0 Interface Reset
04:04:40: ATMSIG-IF:atmSig_clearAllSvc: Port ID : ATM0 Interface Reset
r6
I corrected the ip address but the routers still can not complete the call.
Here is the output of the debug atm sig-all after i configured the switch
that connected routers are users no another switch:
r6#
04:02:04: ATMSIG(ATM0 0,0 - 0243/00): (vcnum:0) API - alloc_connection_id F3
04:02:04:
ATMA
Yes. And you will find below the output of the show route on the LS100:
LS100#show route
Destination Type PrimaryVPI Secondary
VPI
4700010001 0001000100 011110 1110111000 NSAP * 0 10 0
200
4700020002 0002000200 020000 2220222000 NSAP *
At 9:12 PM + 3/7/03, MADMAN wrote:
>I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
>
>Dave
While it isn't link state, the DUAL algorithm is completely different
than that of IGRP.
>
>John Neiberger wrote:
>> This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
>
>Big deal because it's 6800 miles for a full minute. An OC-48 can't push data
>that fast that far or that long.
>
I don't understand...there are OC-192s (WDM, multiples on a fiber) in
operational use on quite a number of undersea cables.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.
At 8:56 PM + 3/7/03, John Neiberger wrote:
>Here's a quote from something I just saw in the news:
>
>"Scientists at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center used fiber-optic
>cables to transfer 6.7 gigabytes of data -- the equivalent of two DVD
>movies -- across 6,800 miles in less than a minute.
At 09:30 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>""MADMAN"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
>
>
>the REAL question is "which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching?" ;->
I'm working on a draft for ARP switching. Still str
At 09:05 PM 3/7/2003 +, John Neiberger wrote:
>I'm at the early stages of considering migrating away from a
>point-to-point frame relay network to a layer 3 MPLS-based private
>network and I have a couple of questions based on some preliminary
>verbal information.
>
>I was told that no router r
The question was whether or not Cisco used the "standard" 0x7E as a flag in
their HDLC implementation. The only WAN protocol analzer I could dig up
predates Cisco HDLC by a few decades. So I did rely on an o'scope as
planned. Between keepalives, a constant binary
10011001100110 c
A reply from another list:
"I'm going to launch a couple DAT tapes across the parking lot with a
spud gun
and see if I can achieve 923 Mb/s!"
Classic!!!
Symon
-Original Message-
From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2003 21:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Inte
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
the REAL question is "which is better, EIGRP or L3 switching?" ;->
>
>Dave
>
> John Neiberger wrote:
> > This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
> >
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm at the early stages of considering migrating away from a
> point-to-point frame relay network to a layer 3 MPLS-based private
> network and I have a couple of questions based on some preliminary
> verbal information.
>
> I was told t
I agree 100%, it is ENHANCED, read glorified, IGRP.
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
> This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
> does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
> relationships and it uses hellos, as do OSPF and IS-IS, but those h
John Hutchison wrote:
>
> Big deal because it's 6800 miles for a full minute. An OC-48
> can't push data
> that fast that far or that long.
>
>
Yes it can. SONET is 60x60x24x7x52 at whatever rate the optics are running
at. Distance is not an issue. Upper-layer protocols (such as TCP) that
mi
John Neiberger wrote:
>
> Here's a quote from something I just saw in the news:
>
> "Scientists at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center used
> fiber-optic
> cables to transfer 6.7 gigabytes of data -- the equivalent of
> two DVD
> movies -- across 6,800 miles in less than a minute.
>
> Pushin
I'm at the early stages of considering migrating away from a
point-to-point frame relay network to a layer 3 MPLS-based private
network and I have a couple of questions based on some preliminary
verbal information.
I was told that no router reconfiguration was required on our side but
I don't see
Big deal because it's 6800 miles for a full minute. An OC-48 can't push data
that fast that far or that long.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64769&t=64767
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
Are you matching the right line interfaces with the devices actually
connected to the Terminal Server? IOS command "show line" should tell you
what lines are active on your terminal server.
Is the interface with IP address 1.1.1.1 up & up? IOS command "show ip int
brief" should help you determine
We've spent a fair bit of time refining some of the BGP definitions
in this document, and they might help with some confusing points.
They do represent a consensus among Cisco, Juniper, NextHop and
Nortel. One of my coauthors, Sue Hares, is cochair of the main BGP
committee and we are anticipat
Here's a quote from something I just saw in the news:
"Scientists at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center used fiber-optic
cables to transfer 6.7 gigabytes of data -- the equivalent of two DVD
movies -- across 6,800 miles in less than a minute.
Pushing the tech envelope
The team was able to tr
Your IP addresses are incorrect. It looks like you forgot the 8 in 108 on
R6.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
"Your #1 choice for Cisco rack rentals."
- Original Message -
From: "John Tafasi"
To: "Cisco Group
you didn't show your interface configuration, do you have at least one not
shut down with the ip address 1.1.1.1 ?
scott
""McHugh Randy"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I cant seem to access any of my routers from the term server . Here is the
> config and what errors i am getting
> !
hi
i see no reasons why it can't be done.
u could use the following in int config mode:
ip helper-address x.x.x.x
use the brodcast address of the network that should receive the udp traffic
(directed broadcast).
specify the udp port that the application uses, by the following in g
""Scott Roberts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I guess I'm the only one with the problem of that many then. I'll take
your
> words for it that it works OK, but I still keep thinking back to that one
> study (don't recall its name), and can't help but think effiecency would
go
> by som
ALL-
I am having a problem with Dynamic Natting using a 1601R router over Frame
Relay. Every time I set it up to use over 60 addresses the router hangs or
reboots.
I am using IOS 120221a IP PLUS
I am being told by CISCO that this IOS is not specifically used for any form
of natting. What do I do
I seem to recall a question on the recert along those lines. I can
pretty much remeber the questions but I am not going to post it. This
post would help one come to the correct conclusion.
Dave
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> ""MADMAN"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>sp
I guess I'm the only one with the problem of that many then. I'll take your
words for it that it works OK, but I still keep thinking back to that one
study (don't recall its name), and can't help but think effiecency would go
by some noticeable degree. anybody can through switch and hubs around,
w
Hi Group,
I have two atm routers that are connected to a Cisco Lightstream 100 atm
switch. I am trying to cause r6 to call r9 but the call does not succeed. I
have configured svc routes on the switch and configured the two routers to
use svc to reach each other. Below you will find the necessary
Today I read two opposite posts about the MAC address format on MAC
access-list.
The article on 'http://www.netmasterclass.net/site/lib.php' (article
Filtering DLSW) says that one should use non canonical format.
The link
'http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ib
alaerte Vidali wrote:
>
> Am I missing something? Because I do can use the command 'ip
> ospf dead-interval'
The original question was how to change the dead interval without using the
dead-interval command. It tests your knowledge of one aspect of the OSPF
protocol, rather than your practical kn
Symon Thurlow wrote:
>
> HI Priscilla,
>
> Thanks for your response. This problem is driving me nuts.
>
> Looking at sh int, sh frame pvc etc I can't see any significant
> errors or problems.
>
> We have been using auth for some time. No significant changes,
> other than a power down on Frid
This really isn't the case. EIGRP is purely distance vector. In no way
does it behave like a link state protocol. It establishes neighbor
relationships and it uses hellos, as do OSPF and IS-IS, but those have
nothing whatsoever to do with whether protocol is DV or LS. Some people
get hung up o
The Cisco answer is hybrid, but that's a load of bullhocky. EIGRP is a
DV protocol. Cisco marketing likes to call it a hybrid because it has
some features that are also present in link state protocols, but they're
not specifically link state features. EIGRP is NOT a link state
protocol in any wa
Didn't quite understand your question.?
--
Curious
MCSE, CCNP
""Ahmed Ali"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> I've in the process of configuring and 806. However I can ping the
external
> interface on the router from the internal lan. Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks
> Ahmed
Me
nice catch daniel, I've never used that before, will be mulling this one
over in my lab for the next week.
learn something new everyday,
scott
""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> standby track (interface) might do the trick.
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/6.html
>
Ive seen some people posting here and when you check the email properties,
their email address shows up as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need to do this too to avoid spam. How do i do it?
Im using outlook express program and each time i change my email id,
groupstudy sends me an email asking me to verify m
Hooray! We actually solved a problem on GroupStudy. ;-) And someone let us
know. It's frustrating when someone asks for help and then never lets us
know the resolution. This is supposed to be a GroupStudy, in other words a
group learning experience, not a GroupFEEDmeTheAnswerSoIcanDoLessWork.
(Sorr
I cant seem to access any of my routers from the term server . Here is the
config and what errors i am getting
!
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
ip host r1 2097 1.1.1.1
ip host r2 2098 1.1.1.1
ip host r3 2099 1.1.1.1
ip host r4 2100 1.1.1.1
ip host r5 2101 1.1.1.1
ip host fr 2102 1.1.1.1
ip ho
""John Hutchison"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My netacad states:
>
> "Technically, EIGRP is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol that
> relies on features commonly associated with link-state protocols"
>
in none of the Cisco exams I have ever taken has there ever been the m
The most correct answer, IMO, is that EIGRP is an enhanced distance vector
protocol. Were I taking a cisco exam though, out of your two choices I'd go
with hybrid.
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Bornman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 7:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTE
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Hmm. Well maybe I didn't really want you to get your scope out
> then, but rather a protocol analyzer. That didn't sound as
> "appealing" though. :-)
>
> I'm most interested in the fields in the Cisco HDLC header. OK,
> I guess I'm curious about the signal too, no
My netacad states:
"Technically, EIGRP is an advanced distance-vector routing protocol that
relies on features commonly associated with link-state protocols"
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64733&t=64707
--
FAQ, l
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> >Hmm. Well maybe I didn't really want you to get your scope out
> then, but
> >rather a protocol analyzer. That didn't sound as "appealing"
> though. :-)
> >
> >I'm most interested in the fields in the Cisco HDLC header.
> OK, I guess I'm
> >curious about the signal
having the interfaces track one another was in fact the secret sauce
that made it work. i can pull any of the links and it contines to ping
with minimal interruption.
cheers!
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
Date: Friday, March 7, 2003 11:42 am
Subject: Re: it started out a
I agree completely. I think the whole "hybrid" was a marketing department
decision. I'm just glad to find out I wasn't the only one who thought this.
scott
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 03:54 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >""Peter van Oen
never heard of that command...doesn't exist to my knowledge (at least on
12.0)
scott
""Shyam, Sharma S (CAP, GECIS)"" wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Missed the command
>
> show ip eigrp timers
>
> rgds
>
> > --
> > From: Shyam, Sharma S (CAP, GECIS)
> > Reply To: Shyam, Sharm
in real life its hard for me to keep my mouth shut, so even if I intend to
be elusive in answers from now on, I'll probably just shoot my mouth off
here too and just give the answer.
I suppose some of us new-comers will keep you 'old farts' on your toes! ;)
(you know who you are!)
scott
""fred b
I guess my understaning is limited, so I'm interested in hearing the results
of this also.
I've seen the flags left off of various protocols before, but I assumed they
were simply being sloppy. I can't understand how any protocol could be
transmitted without any flag/preamble at all.
scott
""Pri
I'm studying for the Cisco Certified Security Professional certification.
Does anyone know:
1. If Cisco's book "Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection System" ISBN#
1-58705-034-x for the IDS exam (9E0-100) is still good enough to pass the
test with or should I look for a different book to compliment.
2
At 04:31 PM 3/7/2003 +, Willy Schoots wrote:
>Maybe the fact that EIGRP has an option to turn SPLIT HORIZON on/off is
>a big clue towards it being a DV protocol. Last time I checked OSPF/ISIS
>didn't have this option ;-)
OSPF and ISIS are actually distance vector between areas and use a strict
At 03:54 PM 3/7/2003 +, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
> > >Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
> >
> > Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me t
In the following secnaryo should there be any problems for the hosts on the
inside of router1 to connect to the hosts on the otherside of the VPN tunnel
inside networkrouter1router2internet
inside of router1 are RFC1918 addresses are used
router1 is doing NAT
in between the router is
That's an excellent point. With this design you run a risk of
asymmetrical routing. To solve this, in the HSRP configuration on each
router have the e0 interface track the e1 interface and vice-versa.
That way, if you pull a cable on one side, this triggers failover on
both sides.
Give that a s
Maybe the fact that EIGRP has an option to turn SPLIT HORIZON on/off is
a big clue towards it being a DV protocol. Last time I checked OSPF/ISIS
didn't have this option ;-)
Cheers,
Willy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
The Long and Windin
HI Priscilla,
Thanks for your response. This problem is driving me nuts.
Looking at sh int, sh frame pvc etc I can't see any significant errors
or problems.
We have been using auth for some time. No significant changes, other
than a power down on Friday, problem notice don Monday. I have gone ov
""Peter van Oene"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
> >Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
>
> Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though.
in what way? the hop count is pretty well hidden in the dark in
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> speaking of NDA...
if this is a question directly off the CCIE written it deserves to be
revealed and publicly ridiculed :->
>
>Dave
>
> Reza wrote:
> > Hybrid.
> >
> >
> > ""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:11 PM 3/7/2003 +, Johan Bornman wrote:
>Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Cisco calls it Hybrid. It looks pretty distance vector to me though. A
hello mechanism and adjacencies does not a link state one make.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?
speaking of NDA...
Dave
Reza wrote:
> Hybrid.
>
>
> ""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
--
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367
I would rather have a German division in f
mirable dictu!
secret is in the standby track command. lost 9 pings and then picked
up just like nothing happened. can pull any of the 4 links now an it
works just like in the movies.
thanks all.
- Original Message -
From: garrett allen
Date: Friday, March 7, 2003 6:57 am
Subject:
EIGRP is a hybrid. It can be said that it is a distance vector routing
protocol that acts like a link state routing protocol.
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Johan Bornman"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 7:11 AM
Subject: EIGRP for CCIE Written [7:64707]
> Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Dist
Hi Guys
I'm being offered 16MB DRAM Simms that were once in a Cat RSM module.
Can I install these into a 2500 Router ??
Thanks
Simon
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64719&t=64719
--
FAQ, list archives, and sub
Hybrid.
""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64718&t=64707
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
""Johan Bornman"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is EIGRP a Hybrid or Distance Vector protocol?
>
Yes.
Cisco docs call it a "hybrid" protocol because it combines some link state
features, yet also has hop count ( distance ) limitations.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
