NEVER too soon to learn to do CCO searches.
""Slava Kosoy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can you pus something concrete in?
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
> [EMAI
going through Parkhurst.
1.4 aggregate-address net mask attribute-map route-map name
1.5 aggregate-address net mask route-map name
no difference. So what's the point?
BTW the CCO command and configurations guides aren't a lot of help here. The
command reference is quite sparse, in fact, when i
you might have to wait a year for the one YOU want to come out.
What's cisco got now - about 4 thousand distinct supported images?
Chuck
""Ole Drews Jensen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well, you wont have to wait a year for the next IOS to come out, if that
to add a couple of cents worth of observations here, one can have an
undetermined number of secondary addresses on an interface. I used to use
secondaries indiscriminantly when trying to emulate huge networks on a three
router pod. this was before I discovered the joys of loopbacks. We have had
a
$$$
the CCIE has become the coin of the realm for Cisco and their channel
partners. Partners get better discounts, and thus can sell more equipment
than can the mom and pop shops. Have to have so many CCIE's on staff to
achieve the various partner levels.
within the Cisco
the book's been out two weeks, and already half.com is selling it used? this
is not good, IMHO!
Chuck
PS www.addall.com is a similar service you might want to check.
""Rich Russell"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> www.bestwebbuys.com/books
>
> ranks the books
BTW, maybe this is just the ticket for that guy who keeps whining about how
expensive practice labs are from the various training material companies.
Chuck
""Rich Russell"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> www.bestwebbuys.com/books
>
> ranks the books from cheap
Off topic VPN comment. My employer is FINALLY moving to VPN access to our
company network. This instead of that crappy ISDN RAS telco solution they've
been running for years. I'm so lucky to have been chosen as one of the beta
testers. Probably because I've been complaining so loud for so long.
if one is using the book as a source of labs for practice, one can
supplement this one with the Parkhurst book for BGP, which goes into far
more detail than anyone other than an ISP might care ( except that it
doesn't cover local-as for some reason )
HTH
Chuck
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in me
my version of ( C2500-JOS56I-L), Version 12.1(11), also works. this is the
version Cisco let me download after I reported the bug where entering the
BGP default-information orginate command caused routers to reload. I am
still not sure if the image I have is the one available in the normal
downloa
when you are trying to study for the recertification test, but you have too
much work to do in your real job, are you "stuck in active"?
when you are taking the test, are you "open confirm"?
after you have completed the test, and have clicked the "complete" button,
but have not yet received your
Fred, this is fascinating reading ( ok, so I need a life :-> ) but I am
failing to understand the "why" behind the requirement.
Recognizing that there were real problems in real networks that those who
wrote the RFC were trying to solve, is there something I am missing in the
description?
In the
while I can't comment on what I did or did not see specifically, I did
re-check CCO to see what they say. Nothing specific at all, really. And to
be honest, I do think that Cisco could be a bit more forthcoming publicly.
Last I saw in the Networkers CCIE Power Session presentation, MPLS was not
sp
this isn't turning into another one of those "whiny crybaby socialist I have
the right to get anything I want whether I pay my dues or not" threads, is
it? :->
Chuck
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You can also look at things from the point of view of pr
An interesting read, particularly since I am reviewing Kennedy clark's cisco
Lan Switching book prior to reviewing Cat5K and Cat 3920 configuration.
I am somewhat surprised at both the phenomenon and the concludion. Spanning
tree blocks for particular reasons.
when you concluded that your config
sure. you have two routes to the other destination, on both routers. the
routers, in other words, are load sharing based on something in their
routing tables.
post your entire configs. or at least your show ip route results.
Chuck
""McHugh Randy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMA
prior to IOS 12.x, the wild card mask method alowed quite a bit of
flexibility. Suppose you had all of your serers on a particular subnet, but
you wanted a different subset of those servers to be accessible from
different subnets. It used to be that you could specify something like
access-list 10
however it happened, there are two equal cost paths to the 172.16.1.0
network as shown in the R1 routing table.
note the dual routes - one directly connected to serial 0 and one directly
connected to serial 1
that is the reason that you had the "half successful ping"
I have seen stuff like this
I presume we all understand that 250.x.x.x is a fictitious address, i.e. is
used here as an example, and cannot legally be used for any reason. :->
If Pac Bell assigned you a /24, and stated that dot 254 is the DSL gateway,
do they mean that is your DSL router's ethernet port? that is, do you hav
Speaking only for myself, I look forward to your wit and wisdom when
providing us wannabees with the knowledge we so desperately seek.
While you're at it, can you provide us with a list of the RFC's you have
written? And the books? I'd like to check them out. Anything to improve my
own understand
quot; wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> More likely EIGRP !! :-P
>
> Jason
>
> ""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Somebody spending too much qualit
is this something we should be talking about in public? ;->
Chuck
""Tom Richs"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone know why machines on a switch are arping itself such that it can't
> communicate with anything else except itself.
>
>
> __
Is it slow at work today or what?
I was browsing CCO and ran across something called "long reach ethernet"
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/ts_122701.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/servpro/solutions/long_ethernet/
lots more.
Interesting product and market. Interesting, because on the
for whatever reason, my mind has been ensnared with thoughts of the Cat 3920
token ring switch and various implications.
I want to run a couple of concepts through the list, just to check that my
understanding is correct.
So, because of the nature of token ring, one has to do some jiggering to do
CTED]...
> Very interesting technology. Maybe I should start my own consulting
company
> to install these devices in hotels and make my million :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:11 PM
> To: [EM
I sure love slow days like today. I've discovered a whole new section on the
company intranet - a group that does performance and acceptability testing
for vendor equipment which we sell.
So I'm looking over the firewall report - Cisco 515 versus several other
things.
I have never seen or heard
sure. But really, the whole point of IRB is to make is POSSIBLE to bridge
and route the same prtotocls over the same interfaces. This doesn't mean
that you WANT to or HAVE to.
Shame on me for not having my Caslow handy, but perhaps the scenario
requires IPX bridging only?
Come to think of it, br
y. I think the
> bridge number just needs to be the same on both routers and is not
> associated with the BRF. lastly the target ring is the number you
> choose via the source-ring bridge-group command on the router.
>
> FWIW
>
> Dave
>
> Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> >
the CCIE
> lab. We will be waiting for your third "I failed the
> CCIE lab AGAIN" e-mail.
>
> BTW... Your New Year's resolution should be to
> consider minding your own business.
>
>
> ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote:
>
> > Speaking only f
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In the ongoing IETF BMWG work on routing convergence, we are hoping
> that NTP will be good enough to track protocol behavior, but some of
> the more statistically-minded researchers are worried that it will
if you have the ability to look at the running configuration, look for the
command ip name-server [address]
chances are good there is a direct correlation between the presence of this
command and your ability to ping domain names.
Chuck
""beth shriver"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">new
folks looking into RIF's might want to check out Fred Ingham's paper, found
in the Groupstudy referece lists:
http://www.groupstudy.com/notes/notepages/rif2.html
the field in question is the total length of the RIF.
Much as I hate to say it publicly, Sybex and Todd Lammle books of late have
bee
All part of traffic control. Why waste bandwidth for updates that are not
required.
example:
OSPF domainrouter--IGRP domain
the OSPF domain does not require direct knowledge of the IGRP domain, so why
send IGRP updates out the interface into the OSPF domain? or visa versa.
also, as a m
d
DSL connection? Why do your average Joe customers require this? So save
their bandwidth for the things they really want - transferring megabytes of
pictures via e-mail ;->
Chuck
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> All part
the idea of 24 hour rack rental can be attractive. especially for doing
those full blown practice labs.
OTOH, smaller increments make sense for a lot of reasons as well. Suppose I
want to spend the last couple of weeks before the test doing certain
specific things - voice, ATM, Cat configuration
hahaha
I did a search using the keyword "Mary" on CCO just to see what happened.
More Mary's show up than you can shake a stick at, if that's your idea of a
good time. One of this links pointed to a page in Finnish that spoke about a
concert Cisco apparently sponsored a couple of years ago. C
we just went through something along these lines a couple of weeks ago. Try
disabling split horizon on the interface in question and see if the problem
is resolved.
Chuck
""John Richards"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On pages 214- 215 of "Routing TCP/IP by D
I realize this thread is way old, but another possibility is to put the quad
zero static route on the edge route, and use the default network command to
propogate a default to the rest of the EIGRP domain.
internet---internet_router-firewall-edge_router---eigrp_domain
edge router con
Let he who has never done something stupid while learning this stuff cast
the first stone ;->
""Brian Whalen"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How inept does a netadmin have to be to block his own servers. If Im that
> guys boss, he is so fired..
>
> Brian "Soni
I don't see a lot of announcements over on the CCIE list - just a couple in
December, and none so far this month, unless I missed something.
OTOH, I see that #8472 announced on 12/1 and #8548 announced on 12/18.
that's the most recent I have seen.
Not surprising with the holidays.
I am not at t
considering how often and to what depth this issue has been and continues to
be discussed here and elsewhere, it shouldn't be too hard to discover the
answer.
try changing your network on the R1-R2 link to a /24 and see what happens.
then report back your findings along with your own speculation.
there is a document on CCO that says 224, and gives some bull pucky reason
for it, but this is flat out wrong. once upon a time I had the link, and
used to use it as one example why you need multiple sources for information
and learning.
someone else posted the correct answer - which also happen
alive and well so near as I can see. Saw a number of messages there that
were posted today.
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What happened to the Jobs newsgroup?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31507&t=31507
---
true or false - loopback interfaces can never be down unless the entire box
fails..
""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> They have removed ATM and Voice completely. Don't bother studying it.
You
> should really focus on your loopback and token ring
define "basic" ;->
""EA Louie"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This might help you:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#44
>
> there are two links there that cisco says are the voice and atm content.
>
> basically, they say, b
I had the extreme good fortune of sitting in a meeting today with a
customer. The project has moved out of the sales phase ( a year in the
making ) and into the project phase. In attendance were the customer's top
IT networking staff and my employer's project team.
This ended up being a four hour
pick up the RIF papers that are available free. one is on the groupstudy web
site, and was written by Fred Ingham. the other is, I believe, found at the
CCPrep web site, and is written by Lou Rossi. Don't lose your CID materials.
The CCIE written and the CID are remarkably similar in perspective a
doesn't matter.
Serial1/0 100.100.100.1 YES manual up
up
Serial1/1 100.100.13.1YES manual up
up
r1#ping 10.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.!.!.
Success rate is 40 percent (2/5), roun
Anyone have some sample Lightstream 1010 configs they can send me privately?
for configuring the LS so that ATM edge routers can route over ATM?
Yes I have checked CCO and the doc CD. I could spend a good portion of my
life studying how to set up a Lightstream so that ATM routers ( 36xx and
72xx
there will probably be a ton of posts, but why not? I'm waiting for a
download to complete.
The 65xx series switches come of the shelf with a 32 gig backplane. If you
anticipate needing a bigger backplane, you must purchase a switch fabric
module ( SFM ) which then increases your backplane to 128
to judge from the lack of traffic on the list, I gather you bad boys and
girls are watching football instead of studying.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31777&t=31777
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
without knowing your configs, I can't say for sure, but in fooling with this
a bit after reading this post, I believe you may have run into a classful
issue on the default-network.
in a simple linear setup R5R1-R3 observe the R3 routing table:
* 100.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D
OK, so I've been doing rack testing for some people who are going to be
going public Real Soon Now.
Got some things mocked up. Some of which relate to topics discussed on this
forum yesterday and today. I need to check something and issue the command
"show ip prot" enter.
r2#sh ip prot
% Ambiguo
What would be far more valuable than the doc CD would be about four more
hours to complete the work. I'd make that trade any day!
""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> A CD with lots of example configs including all of the answer configs for
> your lab.
I created a line of routers R5---R1---R3-R2 ( that's the way the test
pod I was using is set up )
There are loopbacks on R5 and R2 that are addressed and will become the
default networks
R5 and R2 contain the statement ip default-network.
R5 contained the 100.x.x.x/24 and the 199.1.1.x
with the new one-day format, you will be able to connect to all your routers
without having to configure anything ( unless, of course, there is a
hardware failure ;-> ). The monkey work has been eliminated, leaving lots of
points for things more important.
Chuck
""Oliver Steudler"" wrote in mes
use IOS 12.(5)T10. you folks you should be using 12.(5)T9, it has
less
> bugs in it.
>
> thanks,
> -Brad Ellis
> CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security)
> Network Learning Inc
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> used Cisco gear: www.optsys.net
> CCIE Labs, racks, and classes: http://www.
router side is configured correctly )
interesting. time wasting.
Chuck
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone have some sample Lightstream 1010 configs they can send me
privately?
> for configuring the LS so th
Is Mentor back in business? web site is not there.
The news this morning is that a company called Element K has purchased the
Vlab technology, and will be marketing the labs.
Point to note - in terms of Mentor, Vlabs was an asset, people who bought
services were creditors. The bankruptcy court w
interesting question. came up in a customer meeting the other day as well.
IMHO, this gets down to design preference. I am of the school of thought
that there needs be some way of getting to any router in a network ( design
permitting, cost permitting ), and that each router in a network needs so
he may have meant the San Joaquin valley, or Yosemite valley, or Rincon
valley ;->
The folks I know in Madera, for example, are good folks and try hard, but
often just don't have the background, theoretical or practical, to deal with
some of the more complex issues that arise.
Chuck
""Marc Vacc
why do you think you need to change? seriously? what would dynamic routing
give you that you don't have now - in terms of stability and the like?
it might seem an odd thing to say, but I believe that dynamic routing in
small environments, and maybe even in some larger environments, is over
rated
split horizon is NEVER an issue with OSPF. Nor with BGP
If you are using the physical interfaces in all cases, and you are trying to
ping the directly connected interface of the other side, your pings will
fail. This is true of all routing protocols. At least according to the
extensive experiment
ltipoint mode?
>
> O 7.7.7.3/32 [110/128] via 7.7.7.1, 00:07:18, Serial0
> O 7.7.7.1/32 [110/64] via 7.7.7.1, 00:07:18, Serial0
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> >From: "Chuck Larrieu"
> >Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
jut got this one from Cisco. One more incentive.
-
TO: Cisco Career Certificate Holder: CCNA, CCNP, CCDA or CCDP
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUBJECT: Upcoming Expiration
CCIE Candidates:
1. If you are currently certified as a CCIE and continue to maintain your
CCIE certification you
do things like hotwiring your serial ports to connect analogue modems count?
Is IOS firewall a "stupid router trick" ( in addition to being poor design
and asking for trouble ) ?
How about ODR?
"Eric Waguespack"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> over the years,
Based on my first experience with this means of purchasing books, I have the
following observations:
1) price is great
2) service / delivery sucks
Don't be in a hurry when you use this subsidiary of e-bay. from the postmark
to my hands was about a week, but the postmark is two weeks after I pla
Just got my copy.
Reading the "About the Authors" section alone is impressive. All those
associated with the book are CCIE's. I look forward to discovering if there
are any errors in the book. One would hope not, given the credentials of the
writers and reviewers, one of whom was the Halifax Lab
Dare I release my currently scheduled date so I can look? ;->
the rule of thumb is that you can book a date this week or in six months,
but nothing in between.
Also, I believe Cisco is opening up dates on a month by month basis. In
other words, say for the month of February the schedule was base
this Cisco offering is for partners only.
http://cisco.partnerelearning.com ( requires Cisco partner login )
I've been kinda eyeballing the free labs there, and have not seen anything
was wasn't for the most part mindless. anyone else done any work here and
want to give feedback?
Chuck
outside of lab exercises, one might consider using /24's or other full
subnets for purposes of NAT pool addresses.
that's about all I can think of.
Chuck
""Walker, Jim"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Your friend is right. Why would you use anything other than
It may also be that copy editors think that because it is tech, that what
they see, although it does not make sense grammatically, does make sense to
other techies. For a tech review I am currently working on, I had to
specifically call the editor and tell him that the chapters were very poorly
wr
call up your PBX vendor and ask.
or take a close look at the cards in the PBX - they might be labeled. (
which would be how the Cisco guy made the determination )
There is no reason that most PBX's would not support E1 - the vendors want
to sell in Europe too. Some of the low end stuff and key s
neat trick!
does this fall into the category of "stupid router tricks"? ( see thread by
same name )
Chuck
""Tony Medeiros"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes there is
>
> Interface serial 0
> no keepalives
> dialer dtr
>
> It will put the interface into U
I set this up for kicks on one of my routers. have just one question:
is this it?
let's call this one a stupid router trick. it seems far more cumbersome than
it is worth.
JMHO
Chuck
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32495&t=32495
I've now browsed chapters 2-5
Chap 2 - LAN protocols - tells you everything you were afraid to ask about
the raw protocols historical tables. cable types, frame types, IEEE
references. Let's call this the "Priscilla" chapter ;->
also covers bridging and switching in good detail. I read with grea
you have a classful issue here. IGRP will not advertise the host route
200.0.0.0/32
if you do a "show ip protocol" you will also see that the IGRP network
installed is 200.0.0./24 IGRP is confused.
BTW do you have ip subnet-zero configured?
""Rajesh Kumar"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
rizon is off
> Multipoint subinterface - ip split horizon is on
> Point-to-point subinterface - ip split horizon is on
>
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640
> 5G Networks, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in
have you tried this particular machine in the other switches?
sometimes a bad windows installation on a pc will blue screen no matter
what.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We're having an interesting issue that just appeared recently. We have
It is possible that there are a couple of test racks with newer equipment.
It may be that a couple of folks have been offered the opportunity to "beta
test" a CCIE lab with a 6K switch in the pod.
>From information I received from someone high in the CCIE program within
Cisco itself, I learned th
the first and obvious thing that comes to mind is IP forwarding on the AS400
box. Got it turned on? Is the routing protocol on the AS400 the same as on
the router?
If not, then static routes on the AS400?
""Hasan Abbas"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear All,
w.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1908.htm
>
> Good luck. Let us know what you discover! Thanks.
>
> Priscilla
>
> At 01:32 AM 1/23/02, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> >I'm resurrecting this one because I have a client.
> >
> >In fact, I was think
configure a /24 or shorter on the interface receiving the updates... ;->
seriously, RIP will accept routes over a particular interface 1) by assuming
that the incoming routes have the same mask as is used on that interface OR
2) at the classfull boundary.
therefore, if the interface mask is a /2
not to mention those little bunnies who don't want to waste the busy network
people's time so install their own cheap switches and hubs onto the LAN,
dual homing them, and wreaking havoc with spanning tree when they power up
and power down their non-authorized equipment. ;->
Chuck
""Mike Sweeney
in that case, use a route map in conjunction with a prefix list. it might
get a little hairy if there are lots of routes from different network
classes coming in ;->
Chuck
""Aamer Kaleem"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am sorry i did not mention that RIP int
saw a design the other day that consisted of ISDN PRI circuits at the host
and T1 circuits ate the remotes. According to the person who specified this,
there are no end to end problems - that this is standard operating
procedure.
I am unable to find any written materials on this topic. Anyone don
not commenting on the policy itself, but I'm wondering if you can explain
why the anti-vlan policy exists?
In all sincerity, I am curious as to the thought process. the "why" is
generally more educational than the "what"
Thanks
Chuck
""John McCartney"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">ne
gee, and my customer happens to have a 3com NIC. whaddaya know!! ( he
has a generic PC, but what's sauce for the goose... - guess I will tell him
to try an Intel NIC )
Chuck
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well, sort of resolved. This turn
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=379112574
auction going on at e-bay. Pretty cheap price, if you ask me :->
Chuck
Please check out my new footers for a new age
1) Altruism
http://www.thehungersite.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/HungerSite
Please help feed hungry people worldwide.
Default gateway and DNS server addresses are two more that come to mind.
DHCP can pass along a lot of information, depending upon whether or not your
DHCP server and your workstation protocol stack support it.
RFC 2131 is, I believe, current
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2131.txt
Chuck
-O
Someone else mentioned it earlier, but I am seeing more information on the
Galton site implying the term of certification, and by implication, the time
of re-certification.
If I read correctly, the term of certification for CCNA, CCDA, and CCNP is
three years.
For example, my completion date for
sometimes it isn't obvious, but on CCO there are lots
of things available, including the following link about
publications:
http://www.cisco.com/public/corp_news.shtml
This
is an excellent place to start. there are also some other mailing list
newsletters which may not be covered here.
Interesting. I will ask around work.
It was my understanding that only the Altiga client worked with the Altiga
box. On the other hand, if it is standards based, who knows?
As to the source of the problem, it may or not be Cisco's. For example, when
you say that it works with ISP X but not with
were /21, it might be far to easy to incorrectly determine the
appropriate mask ( 0.0.7.255 0 and thus create an evening of
troubleshooting.
END OF LECTURE
-Original Message-
From: Fred Ingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 9:09 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Subj
First of all, let me say that I feel your pain.
Secondly, let me suggest that now you know. As should everyone on this list.
Do not take this exam for granted. It is not that CID is hard. Or
necessarily tricky. It does require concentration on the LAN and WAN
sections ( half the test ) and how th
I was a bit curious about that myself. Of course I am Windows-centric.
The one thing I never did understand in the WinNT world was why one could
not have two NIC's in a server, and assign both NIC's into the same subnet.
Could be done easily in the IPX world on a Netware box.
Any thoughts?
Chuc
For those who may be interested:
Thank you for attending Networkers 2000, Cisco Systems 11th annual user
conference. We hope you enjoyed the conference and found the courses and
discussions informative.
All the breakout sessions that were presented at the conference can now be
accessed on line a
Try these on for size:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/18.html
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/techdoc
may have to do some finagling - these are ps files, not pdf.
http://joe.lindsay.net/bgp.html
everything, and I do mean everything!
Best wishes
Chuck
-Original Mess
I'm sure there are several people on this list who 1) may have downloaded a
copy of this paper at the time it was offered for free or 2) subscribed to
CertificationZone and have received this paper in the mail. ( subscription
also entitles one to download back issues and previous months' white
pap
www.cisco.com/tac
includes direct links to information about all our favorite topics,
including password recovery. I haven't had a chance to compare, but there
appear to be separate areas for registered and guest users.
Chuck
Think life is unfair? Consider that if life were completely fair, in
901 - 1000 of 1355 matches
Mail list logo
