RE: PLEASE HELP !!! Automatic dialing (Second Chance)

2001-02-28 Thread Darren Crawford
If its a flat rate, why not use something like this: ! interface BRI0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252 no ip proxy-arp encapsulation ppp no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache dialer hold-queue 10 dialer load-threshold 1 either dialer-group 1 no fair-queue ppp authentication chap ! acc

RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall & Vlan problem.

2001-03-02 Thread Darren Crawford
You should be able to Ping the inside interface of your PIX. You can not ping an outside interface. There must be route statements in your PIX so that it knows where to send the reply. At 08:52 AM 03/02/2001 -0500, Nabil Fares wrote: >Rob, > >By default PIX does not allow pings! You can hav

RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall & Vlan problem.

2001-03-02 Thread Darren Crawford
ation to another vlan, it can ping everything > in the 155 network EXCEPT for the firewall. > > Obviously I am confused. > > Thanks for your help. Any further thoughts would be appreciated. > rob > >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Darren Crawfor

Re: Syslog Server

2001-03-13 Thread Darren Crawford
Christopher, Try Syslogd. It's a free app., easy to use and it provides text file type log that are configurable to last a week, a month or a year. Whatever you like. It can be found at: http://www.cls.de/syslog/eindex.htm Another would be Triaction's. It runs on Windows 95 & NT 4.0+ only.

Re: How to Open Pix firewall Ports

2001-03-13 Thread Darren Crawford
If you are opening the ports to "outside" entities you'll need to create conduits. They would look something like this: conduit permit udp host 1.1.1.1 eq 3050 any conduit permit tcp host 1.1.1.1 eq 3050 any conduit permit udp host 1.1.1.1 eq 3051 any conduit permit tcp host 1.1.1.1 eq 3051 an

Re: frame-relay backup with ISDN

2001-03-13 Thread Darren Crawford
It has been my experience that this is required. I even use it if the call is local. HTH Darren At 04:47 PM 03/13/2001 -0500, Alex Lee wrote: >Hi group, > >We are going to setup an isdn BRI backup between two sites located in two >different states. > >In my dialer map ip command do I need to

Re: CCIE token ring..

2001-03-16 Thread Darren Crawford
Know the Catalyst 3920. That will be your Token Ring attachment to your router. MAUs are gone. Since it's a single switch you'll need to know how to configure different VLANs for the different ring numbers you'll have to bring up. Darren At 10:29 PM 03/16/2001 +0800, Jit Cherng wrote: >curre

Re: Cat6k vlan configuration

2001-03-22 Thread Darren Crawford
I agree with Rik regarding your subnet size. It's way too big. Divide people up by floor, wing or business function, whatever makes sense. Also you'll save yourself quite a few headaches by hard coding your speed and duplex at the switch. HTH Darren At 12:37 PM 03/22/2001 +, Karl Brenn

Re: max speed of X.25 on Cisco routers

2001-03-26 Thread Darren Crawford
X.25 is design for speeds of 56K or below. In a previous life (Apple Computer), I had lots of experience working with their X.25 network. 56K was/is the top end. Sorry! Darren At 08:53 AM 03/26/2001 -0600, Pickard, Richard wrote: >3/26/2001 8:51am Monday >=20 >Can anyone help me out with

RE: VLAN and IP question [7:240]

2001-04-11 Thread Darren Crawford
I agree! I'm at a client right now that has subnetted their VLAN with /21 addressing (2046 addresses per) and then added up to 4 secondary addresses on top of that. Granted they are not using all the available addresses in the space. Big and flat is generally not good. Especially in chatty en

RE: Catalyst 6509 and DHCP [7:408]

2001-04-12 Thread Darren Crawford
Try "clear arp" on the MSFC. If that doesn't work you may need to "clear cam dynamic" on the switch. At 07:19 PM 04/12/2001 -0400, Vijay Ramcharan wrote: >ARP table of the MSFC below. > >Core_Even_MSFC#sh arp >Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type Interface >Internet 10.4

Re: HSRP [7:1256]

2001-04-19 Thread Darren Crawford
In a campus environment, I recommend having each building in its own HSRP group. I recently had a client implement another pair of 6509, like you said, on their campus and performance from their call center to the main frame (located in a building across the quad) became rather sluggish. I found

Re: telnet [7:1212]

2001-04-19 Thread Darren Crawford
You can do "autocommand" under LAT services, Line interfaces, DECnet and who knows what else. It would look something like: ! line vty 0 4 login autocommand show ip int brief ! HTH Darren At 02:33 PM 04/19/2001 -0400, EA Louie wrote: >well, that's a little bummer, because if the user is in p

Re: Switching on the CCIE Lab Exam [7:1296]

2001-04-19 Thread Darren Crawford
In the lab an outboard router will handle the VLAN routing. I don't think you need it. Darren At 05:15 PM 04/19/2001 -0400, Lupi, Guy wrote: >I asked this question before, and someone sent some helpful info, but I am >looking for something more specific. I know the 5000 series is the switch >u

Re: anyone has cisco experience,please help!I want to build a [7:1623]

2001-04-23 Thread Darren Crawford
Forget the MAU. The lab has a 3920 switch now that you will have to configure with two VLANs for your Token Ring connectivity. Other than that it looks good. HTH Darren At 12:05 PM 04/23/2001 -0400, WEN JIA YANG wrote: >Equipment Name > >Token Ring MAU(8 ports) 28v >Ethernet Hub(C1900 12 10M po

Re: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]

2001-05-02 Thread Darren Crawford
Your sc0 interface can be in either VLAN you've mentioned or something different. The trunk should be configured something like this to allow VLANs 10 and 20 to traverse the cable: Cat5K (enable) > set port enable 1/1 set port duplex 1/1 full set trunk 1/1 on 10,20 Rtr7513# ! int fa

Re: please help me set up multiple VLANs [7:2993]

2001-05-03 Thread Darren Crawford
I agree with Pete but your management VLAN doesn't have to be VLAN 1. For example, I implemented a DMZ for a client where we used VLAN 999 for the management "rail". Darren At 12:03 PM 05/03/2001 -0400, Peter Van Oene wrote: >Interface sc0 is not all that relevant here as far as I recall. You

Re: Route descriptor blocks???? [7:3104]

2001-05-03 Thread Darren Crawford
The following discription came from CCO: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fint er_c/icfgenrl.htm#xtocid2802 IDB Scalability Cisco IOS Software uses interface descriptor blocks (IDBs) to store interface-specific information, such as protocols configured and t

Re: CCDA Question [7:3180]

2001-05-04 Thread Darren Crawford
Where did you get this? We all know that there's a "deny all" at the end of an access list. At 10:13 AM 05/04/2001 -0400, Jim Dixon wrote: >Hello Group, > >I think this question has the wrong idea about which answer is correct here. >What does the group think? >Am I missing something? > >Sorry y

Re: Protocol Type 0x886F [7:3737]

2001-05-09 Thread Darren Crawford
I ran into this same problem at my current client. Apparently this is a necessary evil in a NT clustered environment for load balancing and fault tolerancy. There are two 1,514 byte packets sent every second by default. One to the MAC of the NIC and the other to the multicast address. The size

Re: CCIE prep - review lab inventory and budget [7:3908]

2001-05-09 Thread Darren Crawford
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Get yourself a 3920. You will see in the lab. Darren At 07:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, Eugene Nine wrote: >Here's what I have so far: >2524 w/ 1 4 in one module >2516 >2507 >2 DTE cables and 1 DCE cable >all above for $1843 (bought it all in one purchase

Re: Powellbooks.com [7:4036]

2001-05-10 Thread Darren Crawford
I don't know about this company but these two have been good: Half Price Computer Books - http://www.hpcb-online.com/ Books A Million - http://www.booksamillion.com/ HTH Darren At 01:02 PM 02/28/2001 -0500, Nabil Fares wrote: >Greetings, > >any of you guys bought books form this site before?

RE: Protocol Type 0x886F [7:3737]

2001-05-10 Thread Darren Crawford
de that was connected via >cross over cable to the other node. By having a pair of NIC's dedicated to >heartbeat we can avoid having the heartbeat flood the network. >TTFN, >Bill in Anchorage > >-Original Message- >From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: CCIE #7354 - for Jeff McCoy [7:3998]

2001-05-10 Thread Darren Crawford
Right on Jack! This is a tremendous accomplishment. Accolades to Jeff is all that should be flying around under this subject. Jeff - Thanks for your candor and your willingness to tell us all about your approach, lessons learned, whatever you want to call. It is greatly appreciated. "Q" - Go

Re: Catalyst 6000 Supervisor Engine question [7:4346]

2001-05-13 Thread Darren Crawford
These boxes have a great deal of horse power so if you're on a small network, the light might not flicker much. ;^) Seriously though, there is no mechanism that I know of to turn it off or on. It defaults as on. Darren At 10:53 PM 05/13/2001 -0400, Brandon wrote: >I have a Cat 6000. The netw

Re: network baselining [7:4417]

2001-05-14 Thread Darren Crawford
Try Lucent's Vital Suite (VS). It's much more intuitive than Concord (doesn't require a week long class just for configuring and running reports). Concord is priced per interface (big routers, and switches require many elements to monitor the whole device). VS is priced per device (big routers

Re: Protocol Type 0x886F [7:3737]

2001-05-14 Thread Darren Crawford
" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Breaking things is bad. I pull my suggestion and have bookmarked the page >> for future reference. >> TTFN, >> Bill >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Darren Cra

Re: network baselining [7:4417]

2001-05-14 Thread Darren Crawford
I use Solarwinds too but what tool are you referring to in the suite for baselining a network? Snooping and documenting yes but baseling...Hmmm. Darren At 09:45 PM 05/14/2001 -0400, Jeff Duchin wrote: >Check out www.SolarWinds.net ... really cool and it has alot of extra tools. >The Engineers e

Re: any atm left? [7:4551]

2001-05-15 Thread Darren Crawford
Absolutely! You still need to know the Classical IP flavor of ATM. Not to spill all the beans but other pieces of your lab will depend on that link being up and functional. Darren At 12:54 PM 05/15/2001 -0400, Morabito Joe wrote: >With cisco taking atm lane out of the lab, will we be required

Re: Question for EE majors [7:4569]

2001-05-15 Thread Darren Crawford
As I understand it, that means the next digits are in HEX. Nothing more exciting than that. At 01:59 PM 05/15/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This may be a rudimentary question for all the EE majors out there. > >Can anyone tell me what the 0x in front of 0x00-80-C2 is for?( Why >don't th

Re: Need some help with ping on PIX [7:4859]

2001-05-17 Thread Darren Crawford
Traffic originating from the inside interface (outbound connections) are allowed by default so an access-list on the inside interface isn't necessary in this case. Here's an excerp from the 5.1 manual: Outbound connections or states are allowed, except those specifically denied by access control

Re: SNA and CCIE R/S [7:4913]

2001-05-17 Thread Darren Crawford
Are you going to have to connect to a mainframe using a CIP or to a Novell SAA gateway? No. But you need to know DLSw, all flavors of bridging and the like. HTH Darren At 05:19 PM 05/17/2001 -0400, Lists Wizard wrote: >Hi group, > >Does the CCIE R/S lab exam covers SNA? > >Thanks >FAQ, list a

Re: Request for Token Ring papers. [7:4960]

2001-05-18 Thread Darren Crawford
I thought that document was very useful. I was also working in a mixed Token Ring / Ethernet environment at the time I took the exam. I also found that the Cisco CBTs were very useful. Darren At 12:04 PM 05/18/2001 -0400, EA Louie wrote: >What kind of questions did you miss? (Is it remotely p

Re: Weird trace results [7:5259]

2001-05-21 Thread Darren Crawford
I've seen this before in networks using HSRP and no route caching. Is it causing a problem or just interesting? Darren At 11:59 AM 05/21/2001 -0400, Vincent Chong wrote: >I suggest that you check your routing table, that's what come out my mind. > >HTH >Vincent Chong > >""Watson, Rick, CTR, OUS

Re: vlans 1-1000 are automatically transported [7:5311]

2001-05-21 Thread Darren Crawford
Try using "sh trunk" to see what you're looking for. Darren At 03:11 PM 05/21/2001 -0400, Reel, JohnX wrote: >Comrades, > >I have one quick question that I have not been able understand so far... can >someone please help with an answer or a direction pointer. I appreciate your >help. > >(1) CAT5

Re: Newbie question [7:5309]

2001-05-21 Thread Darren Crawford
Yes it's an ARP issue. I bet your PIX has the following line: arp timeout 14400 (equal 4 hours in seconds) The other parameters for timeout settings are something like the following: timeout xlate 1:00:00 conn 1:00:00 udp 0:02:00 timeout rpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute

RE: PIX question... [7:5248]

2001-05-21 Thread Darren Crawford
OK kids. Allowing packets from a lower security level interface to a higher security level interface requires a conduit or access list. So yes, it can be done. I wouldn't forget about security though. ;^) D. At 01:50 PM 05/21/2001 -0400, Rizzo Damian wrote: >Actually it seems as if you under

RE: ATM in Lab [7:5319]

2001-05-21 Thread Darren Crawford
Back to Back doesn't provide you with the same feedback you need to fully prepare for the lab. Darren At 04:24 PM 05/21/2001 -0400, Daniel Cotts wrote: >You can run two routers with ATM cards back-to-back. You need a switch for >three or more. > >> -Original Message- >> From: No Data [ma

Re: PIX question... [7:5248]

2001-05-21 Thread Darren Crawford
on the router and allow full access with an >> access-list (for this range of IP addresses) on the outside interface of >the >> PIX. >> >> This is my understanding of how the PIX and NAT translations work, but I >> have not tested this to disprove it, so if I am in error

Re: CCIE written is outdated. [7:5756]

2001-05-24 Thread Darren Crawford
Because as a CCIE you should know how to do this stuff. ;^) D. At 01:04 PM 05/24/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The following have been removed from the lab. Why haven't the been removed >from the CCIE written? > >LAT, DECnet, Apollo, Banyan VINES, ISO CLNS, XNS, ATM LANE, and X.25. >Eff

RE: IP Address [7:5786]

2001-05-24 Thread Darren Crawford
Unless you use "ip subnet-zero" Then it starts with 172.16.0.0. ;^) I agree though, either way you slice this, it's not a network address. D. At 05:38 PM 05/24/2001 -0400, Michael Bambic wrote: >OK first of all 172.16.0.0/21 is actually 172.16.0.0 255.255.248.0 >Which means the network addres

Re: Required TR for Lab Practice [7:6601]

2001-05-31 Thread Darren Crawford
In the lab you'll have a Ring 1 and a Ring 2 via two VLANs in a 3920. I'd practice with two rings if I were you. Darren At 09:14 AM 05/31/2001 -0400, RamG wrote: >Hello - General Q - How many TR int required for CCIE lab practice? I have >2 routers with TR. > >Thanks / RamG x$:0`0:$xx$:

RE: Book club [7:6811]

2001-06-01 Thread Darren Crawford
It has changed to: tcbc.booksonline.com/cgi-bin/ndCGI.exe/Develop/pagHome?clubId=TBC&promo=bhp-1 -5 Darren At 03:57 PM 06/01/2001 -0400, William E. Gragido wrote: >yeah Carl, its www.booksonline.com/telecommunications > > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]

2001-06-01 Thread Darren Crawford
I had to build an async interface on a 3620 not to long ago and the first number allowed me to use was Async65. Sorry Sean. At 10:00 PM 05/31/2001 -0400, Sean Young wrote: >The max. number of Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or >3600s is > >thirty-two (32). I couldn't find an

Re: Voice on lab [7:6979]

2001-06-03 Thread Darren Crawford
Voice in the lab is VoIP across an ATM cloud. At 08:46 AM 06/03/2001 -0400, sparkest pig wrote: >I know that VoIP is on the lab. but how about VoFR or VoATM? >are they included in the VoIP? (the CCIE outline doesnot say that) >__

Re: wireless problem. [7:34110]

2002-02-05 Thread Darren Crawford
I am working with Dell TrueMobile AP1100s, Dell TrueMobile 4800s and Cisco AP350s right now. I have my access points configured with hard coded IP addresses. The wireless users have their NICs configured for addressing via DHCP. So they get DNS, WINS and the like via their DHCP request when the

Re: CIT Test [7:34856]

2002-02-08 Thread Darren Crawford
Easy test for someone who has hands experience. I also used Ole's CITCMD program. Download it at: http://www.RouterChief.com/dowload/citcmd.exe Hopes this helps, Darren At 11:46 AM 2/8/2002 -0500, Joshua Barnes wrote: >I know that folks have asked about this test, but I am taking it Thursda

CID Exam on Wednesday 11/21/01 [7:26486]

2001-11-16 Thread Darren Crawford
Hi all, I'm taking the CID exam next Wednesday. I decided to pickup one of the Boson practice exams for this test. Does anyone have suggestions on areas to focus my studying on or other tools to use? TIA Darren x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Luc

Re: Cisco Wireless Access Point [7:26455]

2001-11-16 Thread Darren Crawford
Yes. I have tested it with several vendor's NICs. You must select "No" under "Use Aironet extensions:" option. Otherwise it only talks to Cisco NICs. HTH Darren At 03:50 AM 11/16/2001 -0500, Thomas wrote: >Hi All - I wonder if the Cisco wireless access point 350 standard? Is it >compatible

Re: token ring to eth [7:26828]

2001-11-20 Thread Darren Crawford
What exactly are you trying to accomplish here? The 2502 only has one token ring and two serial interfaces. If you had a 2513, the router itself would be your 'media converter' between TR and Ethernet segments. To my knowledge, there is no such animal to change your token ring interface into an

Re: Ethernet Class I and Class II repeaters [7:27420]

2001-11-27 Thread Darren Crawford
The Cisco CID book covers this too. Darren At 11:23 PM 11/26/2001 -0500, John Tafasi wrote: >Does any one remeber which one of the cisco press book covers Ethernet >repeater classes? Your answer is highly appreciated > >Thanks > >John Tafasi Darren x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0

Finally CCDP too!! [7:28040]

2001-12-03 Thread Darren Crawford
I wanted to thank everyone who helped me focus and pass the CID exam. Specifically, Jim Walker and Scott Nawalaniec! Thanks for your encouragement and direction in the areas to zero in on. This test is a bruiser! But with perseverance you can get by it too! Darren x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx

Re: LAN sub-interface routing [7:30225]

2001-12-27 Thread Darren Crawford
You will have to use secondary addressing. interface ethernet 0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary HTH Darren At 03:10 PM 12/27/2001 -0500, John Mairs wrote: >Hi, > >I have a 2501 (one ethernet interface) and I wanted to >route over that interface b

RE: CCIE Practical Studies by Cisco Press [7:30243]

2001-12-28 Thread Darren Crawford
Join Books A Million's Millionaire Club. The club discount on books makes them hard to beat. Go to the following to see what I mean: http://www.booksamillion.com/ncom/books?id=2095579934874&pid=1587200023 I'm a member of the club so the book is only $60.75 (19% savings). The club fee is only

Re: LAN sub-interface routing [7:30225]

2001-12-28 Thread Darren Crawford
221563 ) Watch the rap. At 12:13 PM 12/27/2001 -0800, John Mairs wrote: >Thank you sir! I appreciate your time on this. one >side though if it's ok, what is the difference between >secondary interfaces and sub-interfaces? > >John > > >--- Darren Crawford wrote:

Re: CCIE Practical Studies by Cisco Press [7:30243]

2001-12-28 Thread Darren Crawford
According to this you can get a used copy for $51.69 delivered. Someone purchased the book a few days ago and is reselling it? Strange. D. At 09:18 PM 12/27/2001 -0500, Rich Russell wrote: >www.bestwebbuys.com/books > >ranks the books from cheapest to most expensive with shipping > >Rich >www.

Re: ISL Trunking [7:30728]

2002-01-02 Thread Darren Crawford
You can clear the trunks for anything 2-1005 and 1025-4096 (6000 series) but I don't believe it will allow you to do that with the default VLAN. HTH Darren At 06:59 PM 1/2/2002 -0500, Ali, Abbas wrote: >Is it possible to remove default Vlans 1, 1002-1005 from ISL trunking? I am >setting up a I

RE: ISL Trunking [7:30728]

2002-01-03 Thread Darren Crawford
I must disagree with VLAN 1 being the only administrative VLAN. It is simply the default VLAN. At a previous client I set up a DMZ switch with a management VLAN of 999. This was on a Cat5505. HTH Darren At 11:28 PM 1/2/2002 -0500, Mark Odette II wrote: >Ali- >If my memory serves correct, you

RE: ISL Trunking [7:30728]

2002-01-03 Thread Darren Crawford
2 -0500, Hire, Ejay wrote: >True enough, the management VLAN doesn't have to be 1. Using 1 is >reccomended however, because it is the default. > >-Original Message- >From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:32 PM >To: [E

Re: Carrier Transitions : Any Comments [7:30829]

2002-01-03 Thread Darren Crawford
A) No. But next time try "clear controller s 0/0" or whatever slot it's in. B) Carriers never admit they have a problem C) It could have been something goofy like your cable got bumped and loosened the WIC. If everything was buttoned down tight this is highly unlikely. HTH Darren At 04:07 P

Re: OT: Is this going to be a trend for the CCIE cert??? [7:19300]

2001-09-10 Thread Darren Crawford
Did you notice that they want "3-6 years experience in High Speed Networking" as well. A CCIE below 3000 has well over 6 years experience. They don't even know what they're asking for. At 03:02 PM 9/10/2001 -0400, Eric Rogers wrote: >I was just cruising on the dice jobs board when something caug

Re: Routing and Bridging [7:19472]

2001-09-11 Thread Darren Crawford
My client has a configuration as shown below running over a 56K circuit for IP traffic and some terminal access to a mainframe not yet upgraded for TN3270. HTH D. At 05:46 PM 9/11/2001 -0400, MADMAN wrote: >ME thinks Russ wants to bridge and route the same protocol in which >case that won't wor

Re: Cisco Certified Network Instructor [7:19659]

2001-09-12 Thread Darren Crawford
Excuse my ignorance but who is the CCNI offered by because it is not listed any where on Cisco's site that I saw? D. At 03:52 PM 9/12/2001 -0400, SUranjith Ariyapperuma wrote: >Fellow list members, >I have been asked to do the Cisco Certified Network Instructor (CCNI) Lab 4 >(the final exam) in

RE: caslow edition 1 vs 2 [7:22744]

2001-10-18 Thread Darren Crawford
I disagree. The books are different (some overlap but not much) and each excellent in their own right. Volume II has a lot of I have both in my library and would recommend everyone on this quest to do the same. My $.02 Darren At 09:51 AM 10/14/2001 -0400, Paul Jin wrote: >Probably about 10-15

Re: Jeff Doyle Vol I or II? [7:24269]

2001-10-26 Thread Darren Crawford
Both. At 02:25 PM 10/26/2001 -0400, juno vtv wrote: >Hi everybody, > >Does anybody know what the difference are between Jeff Doyle's Routing >TCP/IP Vol 1 and 2, besides BGP stuff?I have heard some conflicting >arguments about these books. Which volume would you guys recommend? Thanks! > >-juno

Re: "ebgp-multihop" command [7:24482]

2001-10-29 Thread Darren Crawford
Except when you're in the lab exam and you can't use static routes. ;^) Darren At 08:49 AM 10/29/2001 -0500, Engelhard M. Labiro wrote: >Hi, > >Normaly use ebgp-multihop if you put the IP address >of loopback interface of your peer at the neighbor command eg: >if your peer loopback is 1.1.1.1,

Re: ISDN backup will not activate [7:25129]

2001-11-02 Thread Darren Crawford
Where's the phone number to dial? I've always used a phone number after the broadcast statement. Like the following: dialer map ip 172.20.10.2 name New_York_City broadcast 17775551212 HTH Darren At 05:27 PM 11/2/2001 -0500, nettable_walker wrote: >11/2/2001 4:30pm Friday > >Professional'

Re: Urgent! Please help! [7:26396]

2001-11-15 Thread Darren Crawford
More specifics would be helpful in helping you. Darren At 01:50 PM 11/15/2001 -0500, Patrick Ramsey wrote: >My stuff is broken, I think I need some things to fix it. > >Any ideas on what's wrong? > >any help appreciated! > >-Patrick x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:

Re: Access list or Conduit? [7:72514]

2003-07-18 Thread Darren Crawford
Conduits are global and access lists are interface specific. Go with access lists. At 09:11 PM 7/17/2003 +, E. Keith J. wrote: >Hi all > > > >The boss wants to allow ping. > >In the website I found the way by using an access list. > >In another config I see a conduit is used. > > > >Wha

Re: NOBODY emails [7:72997]

2003-07-24 Thread Darren Crawford
YES! At 03:56 AM 7/25/2003 +, Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) wrote: >Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that >are empty?? > >Larry Puckette >Network Analyst >Temple Inland >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >512-434-1838 >Where there is no idol but money and power, there is no hope

Re: IP Subnet calc. [7:75085]

2003-09-09 Thread Darren Crawford
www.solarwinds.net has a nice one. At 05:15 PM 9/9/2003 +, Steven Aiello wrote: >Any one know a good free subnet calc. After realizing how many break >downs, and how many subnetworks you would have to figure for CIDR, I >would rather not do it with pan and paper. Free is good, for the calc