7206vxr Watchdog Hardware reset [7:70990]

2003-06-20 Thread Keith Woodworth
Got a nasty prob...case open with TAC, spare parts being flown in as we speak but just want to get the collective wisdom here. 7206vxr, NSE-1, IO Controller, 4 Faste Modules. 3 spontaneous reboots starting yesterday. Started capturing logs on the console, finally got a Watchdog reset on the

3550... [7:70412]

2003-06-09 Thread Keith Woodworth
Replaced an old foundry serveriron switch with a 3550 over the weekend. Our primary NS (old BSD/OS 3.1 all patches) was plugged into the serveriron and had well over 200 days uptime. NS was moved to the 3550, all that changed was moving the cable from the old switch to the new 3550. Made the

Byte counters on a Catalyst 5500... [7:64120]

2003-02-28 Thread Keith Woodworth
do the above wrap at a certain number? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64120t=64120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

NPE-200 [7:58935]

2002-12-10 Thread Keith Woodworth
I cant find what I'm looking for on CCO, even logged in, and its annoying me...I'm not keen on Cisco's new site layout. Our upstream that was have a DS3 with, has their router, a 7202 w/NPE-200, located in our equipment room. We have been noticing a large slowdown in the evenings sometimes.

ACL... [7:58341]

2002-11-30 Thread Keith Woodworth
simple question. want to write an ACL: access-list 100 permit ip 209.145.96.0 0.0.3.255 any just to make sure Ive got my bits right this will cover: 209.145.96.0/24 209.145.97.0/24 Is that right? Thanks, Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58341t=58341

Re: ACL... [7:58341]

2002-11-30 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, The Long and Winding Road wrote: |- access-list 100 permit ip 209.145.96.0 0.0.3.255 any |- |- just to make sure Ive got my bits right this will cover: |- |- 209.145.96.0/24 |- 209.145.97.0/24 |- |- |-the 3 in the third octet is 11 in binary. 11 ( binary) covers what decimal

Password check error. [7:58270]

2002-11-28 Thread Keith Woodworth
Need to erase a read only flash on a 2501 so I can tftp a new IOS image and getting an error Ive never seen, nor can I find refernece to on CCO as of yet. I set config-register to 2101 and reload. get a router(boot)en password: password check with an invalid encryption type router(boot) Have

Re: Password check error. [7:58270]

2002-11-28 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Keith Woodworth wrote: |-router(boot)en |-password: |-password check with an invalid encryption type |-router(boot) I figured this out...I did not know it at the time but at this prompt the 2501 using 11.2 does not want the enable secret it wanted the enable password, which

Re: Apparent packet loss... [7:57922]

2002-11-23 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, The Long and Winding Road wrote: |- They have told us to config our ethernet port to half duplex so packets |- will be retransmitted if they get lost in their ATM cloud so we have a |- fairly high collison rate on this port. I dont know enough about ATM to |- say if this is

RE: Apparent packet loss... [7:57922]

2002-11-23 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: |-Don't believe everything you hear! ;-) Couple comments inline. I dont. |-They can't tell if packets are getting dropped from trace route? Just |-because your router doesn't send back the ICMP TTL doesn't mean it's |-dropping packets. It could

RE: Apparent packet loss... [7:57969]

2002-11-23 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Chuck Church wrote: |-Don't ever listen to a sales person. Ever! I know I know! :) What is the ratio of collisions to frames output on that interface to the provider? In just over an hour after a clear counters we had over 6 million collisions on that interface.

Re: Apparent packet loss... [7:57922]

2002-11-23 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Marty Adkins wrote: |-As Priscilla explained, output drops are frequently normal, just indicating |-a speed mismatch combined with a large enough packet burst that the output |-queue limit was exceeded (40 packets). If drops are due to a lack of buffers, |-then that would

Apparent packet loss... [7:57922]

2002-11-22 Thread Keith Woodworth
I need to trouble shoot some apparent packet loss on a 7206VXR with a NSE-1. Weve had some folks downstream of us say that doing traceroutes to their network through us that packets are dropping on our router. I'd like to find a way to actually see if this is the case. I'm kind of concerned that

Clearing ARP. [7:56651]

2002-10-31 Thread Keith Woodworth
We have a Cat5500 with an odd problem. There is a customer with a Vlan setup on 2 RSM's using HSRP. The Vlan is using a /29, with each RSM assigned an IP from the /29, a default gateway from the /29 which leaves 3 usable IP's for the customer. He has 2 devices plugged into 2 ethernet ports on the

Interface In/Out stats [7:52177]

2002-08-27 Thread Keith Woodworth
Small very simple question but need clarification w/regards to MRTG stuff. Have a 7206 connected to a 7202 via xover ethernet. Used the above, when looking at the interface stats on the 7206 is the input rate the data coming into the interface from the 7202? And the output rate the data coming

RE: Interface In/Out stats [7:52177]

2002-08-27 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Charles D Hammonds wrote: |-Yes. |- |-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |-Keith Woodworth |-Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:43 PM |- |-Used the above, when looking at the interface stats on the 7206 is the |-input rate the data coming

Coriolis/Examcram [7:44924]

2002-05-23 Thread Keith Woodworth
Ive purchased over the last few years some books from Coriolis - the Exam Cram series and found them to be not bad. Looks like their sites have been down for the last few weeks. Anyone know what happend to them? They go belly-up? Thanks, Keith Message Posted at:

Cascading 2950XL's [7:43797]

2002-05-09 Thread Keith Woodworth
Just wondering if its possible to cascade two of the above switches the same sort of way you can with Baystack 450's? The Bay's use cascade modules to increase the port density but keep everything in the same broadcast domain and make it seem like you have one 48 port switch instead of 2x24

Re: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]

2002-04-25 Thread Keith Woodworth
, which is default, does that to/for you |- |- Dave |- |-Keith Woodworth wrote: |- |- We had a /24 that was not being used in one part of our network any |- longer. It was routed through 2 RSM's on a Cat5500 switch. |- |- As well the network was in an EIGRP AS that we do for IGP routing on both

RE: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]

2002-04-25 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Kage Roc wrote: |-Im am not sure why this is happening but I'ill take a stab at it. |- |-If a router that is running EIGRP borders 2 major network (i.e. 209.53.131.0 |-Router-208.181.160.0) and auto-summary is turned on within the EIGRP |-config, it will advertise

Re: EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]

2002-04-25 Thread Keith Woodworth
, which is default, does that to/for you |- |- Dave |- |-Keith Woodworth wrote: |- |- We had a /24 that was not being used in one part of our network any |- longer. It was routed through 2 RSM's on a Cat5500 switch. |- |- As well the network was in an EIGRP AS that we do for IGP routing on both

EIGRP routing issue. [7:42479]

2002-04-24 Thread Keith Woodworth
We had a /24 that was not being used in one part of our network any longer. It was routed through 2 RSM's on a Cat5500 switch. As well the network was in an EIGRP AS that we do for IGP routing on both RSM's. So the network was removed from the EIGRP system, a new static route was put in on our

Re: show spanning-tree command and the port number [7:42239]

2002-04-22 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Tony Chen wrote: |-2900XL#show spanning-tree interface fastEthernet 0/1 |-Interface Fa0/1 (port 13) in Spanning tree 1 is FORWARDING |- Port path cost 19, Port priority 128 |- Designated root has priority 8192, address 0010.0db1.7800 |- Designated bridge has priority

RE: Helpppppp [7:41796]

2002-04-21 Thread Keith Woodworth
I'd say yes. I just did a recovery on a 2503 that had not been used in ages. When I could not do enable, I power-cycled, broke out of the boot, did an o/r 0x2142 then hit i to reload, bypassing the startup. Set new secret, wr changes, reload. Took like 60 secs. Keith On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Sean

Re: TAC [7:42141]

2002-04-21 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Steven A. Ridder wrote: |-Has anyone ever had TAC work on a weekend? How can I get an engineer on a |-weekend if I ever needed one? ive called on Satudays and gotten through. These days I open a case on the web as I can usually get a call back faster than if I call myself.

IP subnetting on DSlam equipment. [7:34564]

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Woodworth
Have a question about the above. I feel I understand IP subnetting well enough (CIDR et al.) but something has come up that I dont know how it would work. Our original DSL offering 4.5 yrs ago (which we still have and use) gives the subscriber 3 static IP's. It works by putting the sub on a

RE: IP subnetting on DSlam equipment. [7:34564]

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Andy Hoang wrote: |+You can use IP unnumbered on the 7200 since PPPoE is a point-to-point link. |+The below link has a really good sample config. It is for a NRP, but the |+idea is the same. Nope we dont want to use PPPoE w/an unumbered interface. We want to give static

RE: IP subnetting on DSlam equipment. [7:34564]

2002-02-05 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Todd B wrote: |+You could always do something like assign a larger subnet to a loopback and |+run IP unnumbered on the RBE sub-if. You could then just staticly route the |+3 IP addresses to that sub interface. |+ |+int loopback 0 |+ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 |+ |+int

Simple routing problem... [7:33262]

2002-01-25 Thread Keith Woodworth
to those folks that replied about the above problem about the 6260 DSlam and the 7200 series router and the other layer 3 device you were right about the other device not knowing about the routes...the other device is a Nortel Shasta and I dont like fooling with the shasta as its a tad unstable

Simple Routing question... [7:33168]

2002-01-24 Thread Keith Woodworth
7204 connected via Faste to another layer 3 device. IP on 7204: 64.114.57.2 IP on other device: 64.114.57.1 Subnet mask: 255.255.255.248 One static route on 7204: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 64.114.57.1 7204 is working and fine and reachable. 7204 has an ATM interface (oc3) to a 6260 DSlam. ATM

Auto sensing mode... [7:24375]

2001-10-27 Thread Keith Woodworth
Have discovered some packet loss on our network and figured it out to a duplex setting mismatch between two FE ports on Catalyst 5500 and a 7206. The 5500 is set to auto mode for both the duplex and speed. The speed is ok but it autoed to half instead of full. When I try to put the port in full

Port duplex auto settings [7:24377]

2001-10-27 Thread Keith Woodworth
never mind that questions about port duplex settings on a Cat5500...as usual I was too hasty in posting the question before I went and looked some more on CCO. Found itneed to peg the speed, then the port comes out of auto, then you can peg the duplex at what you want. Sorry for the

Re: 2900XL.... [7:22169]

2001-10-05 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, John Neiberger wrote: |+Keith, |+ |+Fast switching is a router-based technology that changes the way the |+router does route lookups and forwarding. How would you implement this |+on the switch? That explains why pretty much all the documents on Cisco refer to routers using

2900XL.... [7:22169]

2001-10-04 Thread Keith Woodworth
Have a question re: Vlans and 2900 switch. We have a shelf of DSL type gear. 10 slots per shelf. Each slot is connected via ethernet to a port on a 2900XL. Each port is 10Mbit/Half as that is what the DSL gear is designed for. To maybe gain more through put on the 2900 would there be any

Re: Errors on link. [7:4646]

2001-05-18 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Brian wrote: |+yeah i had a case recently with a pair of bsd servers where if the switch |+they were connected was forced to 100/full, the server stayed at half. |+But if the switch set to auto, then 100/full was the result. I was aghast |+in horror, but it did happen.

Re: Errors on link. [7:4646]

2001-05-16 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Circusnuts wrote: |+You say the ports are locked to 100/ Full on the 2924 ??? It sounds as if |+you have done the trouble shooting with the cables. Have you isolated which |+box this is coming from then maybe moved to swap the NIC ??? How are you |+reading the CRC errors

Re: Anyone used SNORT [7:4436]

2001-05-16 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Brad McConnell wrote: |+I do a semi-classical arrangement. We have two pipes to the net going to |+two different switches. I use SPAN to send all ingress traffic on the |+external router to a port which I plug into a hub. I then do the same on |+the second pipe, and plug

Re: Errors on link. [7:4646]

2001-05-16 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Brad McConnell wrote: |+I can only speak from my own experiences, but I have quite a few Linux boxes |+plugged into a 6509, and if I hard-set both the switch and the NICs (Intell |+EEPRO's, Dell servers) to 100full, I'm guaranteed to get errors, including |+quite a few

Re: Errors on link. [7:4646]

2001-05-16 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: |+On the bright side, your reliability is still 255/255, which makes sense |+since only 597 out of 530182 frames have an input error. The ratio of bad |+frames to good frames is 0.001, which is OK. One way to look at it. :) |+Is it copper

Errors on link. [7:4646]

2001-05-15 Thread Keith Woodworth
Have 4 servers plugged into a 2924XL switch. Pegged the links to 100/full and of all the links our mail server always shows errors: 343 input errors, 169 CRC, 174 frame None of the other server links on the switch show any errors of any kind. Ive swapped cable and ports on the switch and still

Re: Switch port Mirror on a Cat5500 [7:4240]

2001-05-11 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Carroll Kong wrote: |+At 08:21 PM 5/11/01 -0400, Keith Woodworth wrote: |+ From what Ive read I can mirror a port on a switched network to be able to |+do this. Is this correct? |+ |+Thanks, |+Keith |+ |+Sure, these ports are called SPAN ports. |+ |+http://www.cisco.com

RE: Switch port Mirror on a Cat5500 [7:4240]

2001-05-11 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Dwayne Saunders wrote: |+you can use the set span command to monitor all fe ports |+ |+D'Wayne Saunders |+Senior MIS Operator, CCNA Ive looked at that but we have 48 port WS-X5012A blades in this switch as well. I dont want to just monitor the FE ports but the *whole*

Duplex settings 2900XL - 7206

2001-03-28 Thread Keith Woodworth
Have a question for duplex settings. Just trouble shooting some transient errors that seem to pop up once in a while and was going over port settings and came across something. We have a FastE port on a 7206 connected to a 2900XL. The 2900 port is config'd as: Auto-duplex (Half), Auto Speed

Back to back.

2000-11-12 Thread Keith Woodworth
Anyone know if its possible to do back to back on 2 1005's? I have a DCE/DTE cable that I used to do back to back on 2501-1005 and was able to do FR/PPP/HDLC etc w/ no problems. Both routers are running same IOS version: IOS (tm) 1000 Software (C1005-NY-M), Version 11.1(24), I think I read

RE: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-10 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jeroen Timmer wrote: Well 11 bits of subnetting is : 255.255.255.224 Class B subnet is always 255.255.x.x so 11 bits of subnetting means after the first 2 255's you got 11 bits of subnetting. Wich is another 255 and then 3 bits of the host adress wich comes to 224. So

Subnet mask question..

2000-10-09 Thread Keith Woodworth
Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet question still gets me. Boson question: IP address 172.16.3.57 w/ and 11-bit subnet mask. What are valid hosts? I think ok class B, but I look at 11 bits as 255.224.0.0 (.1110.0.0) which does not go with the choices of answers

Re: Catalyst 2900XL

2000-09-09 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, Bryan Osoro wrote: Are you using enable password password or enable secret password Well color me enabled, that was it right there, and I missed the command line error. You are right, should have been enable secret, not enable password. Cisco's site said to use enable

Catalyst 2900XL

2000-09-08 Thread Keith Woodworth
Have the above switch and did the password recovery/reset on it but it wont take. I went here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_2900xl.html followed the steps but the last part is kind of off I think. Where is shows this: 13.Change the password. switch#config terminal

Re: Catalyst 2900XL

2000-09-08 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Bryan Osoro wrote: PW Recovery Restart the switch while holding the Mode button for 10 seconds, let go, and you should be to a switch: prompt. Type flash_init and then load_helper after that type rename flash:config.text flash:config.old. then type reset when the switch

Polling Cat5500

2000-08-27 Thread Keith Woodworth
Want to poll a specific port on a Cat5500 via SNMP. Port in question is Mod 10 - Port 4. Its 100Mb fast ether. This is the ifIndex: interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.20 = 20 Since I know that how can I specify via snmpwalk to look at just this interface? Off to look over some other docs but

Re: Correct show syntax for access lists

2000-07-12 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Timothy W. Roberts wrote: This is relating to taking exams: The ACRC Student Guide states that the command to view ALL access-lists on a router is - show access-list. But on the router is shows it as being - show access-lists (with an s). Which one will the test want?

Re: OFF TOPIC - Questions on Tests And Shortstops

2000-06-28 Thread Keith Woodworth
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Brad Ellis wrote: There's always t much time given for tests...let's see, finished CCIE RS written in 15 minutes, finished CCIE ISP written in 25 minutes... if you're talking about the CCIE lab, that's another story!!! (Although I did finish day 1 of the rs with 2

Typo in config...

2000-06-16 Thread Keith Woodworth
A while back I was working in getting a 2502 up and running. It had old boot proms in it, 8 meg flash and 8 meg of ram. The old boot roms did not recognize the flash. I managed to get it going by getting it to boot via tftp via a unix box, going through a 1005 first to get to the unix box. My