My only gripe with the 3550 series is that they once again changed some of
the commands to do the same stuff. For example, to upgrade the IOS, the
image now resides in a folder in flash and you use the archive command
with several possible options. Fallback bridging is another one that
really
Chances are this is NOT a DNS issue. Try to PING www.cisco.com by name and
see if you get name resolution. If you resolve the name to an address then
DNS is not at fault here.
I believe that your issue is more likely caused by an MTU problem. PPPOE
requires 8 bytes of overhead and so your MTU
Has anybody had a problem with PPPOE on a PIX 506 running 6.2(1) code? My
problem appears to be MTU-related - I can PING all day but HTTP only brings
up about a third of the sites I browse. There is a caveat in the docs about
MTU dropping to 1492 with PPPOE, which is supposed to happen
This reply is a lng one!
Please allow me to clear up a couple of misconceptions I have read on this
thread.
First, a while it is true a PIX blocks everything by default, this only
applies to inbound traffic initiated from the outside. Outbound sessions
initiated from the inside are all
There are some router models that have 10Mb interfaces that support trunking
(Dot1Q). What differentiates them is the IOS feature set. You need IP+ on
some of the older models whereas most of the newer models have 100Mb
interfaces and support trunking with just the IP feature set.
If your
Pete, bear in mind that this document is 2 years old. The IOS version on
the switch was 11.2. Anybody care to speculate on how much has changed
since 11.2? How about the changes in Dot1Q since then?
Nonetheless, I don't get a warm and fuzzy feeling with separating external
and internal
Well, you can, just like you can put 2 physical segments in the same logical
(IP) network. Of course, the question begs to be asked, why? as this
doesn't give you anything. You won't be able to do much with it except
bridge the traffic and then you kill the entire rationale behind VLANs.
After
I agree. Change the MTU on the bridges. I have a customer with 5 remote
sites connected via 802.11b and trunking across all 5 and I have to increase
the MTU.
What I would love to see is an update to the Aironet code that supports the
actual trunking header so my bridge management interfaces
Geez...all you guys had to do was ask! ;-}
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gigabit GBIC for 3550 [7:42680]
do great minds think alike, or what ;-
( see my response to the same
Don't forget the ca save all command to save the key once you generate it.
Otherwise it will go away when you reboot the PIX.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Mark Odette II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SSH RSA key
James, I have done this with NT 4.0 and doubt that it really differs much
with Windows 2000. In my opinion, the MS RADIUS product is very basic but
if all you want is authentication then it should work just fine for you,
especially as it's free and lightweight. Different devices are setup in a
One point I believe should be mentioned is the different levels of
awareness each product brings to the table. One of the strengths of the
PIX becomes its primary weakness: the lack of true integrated
application-level awareness. While this lack makes the PIX much faster than
say Checkpoint,
I agree...always enter a specific value.
Yonghai, there is one thing I want to clear up after reading your posts.
MAC address only comes into the root election process AFTER the bridge ID
selection process. Since the default bridge ID on a Cisco switch will
always be the same value, MAC
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rik Guyler
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: If it's a 2611, you're out of luck [7:39788]
Another bit of good info to know:
Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or
Dot1Q
Michael, I have not worked on a 5301, only a 5300 so I will tell you what I
know and maybe it will carry over. Since nobody else has any ideas, maybe
this will help.
In a 5300, the T1 card is a different card than the modem card(s). You said
this is a quad T1 card so you should see 4 T1 ports
Another bit of good info to know:
Traditionally, the 1700 series would not support trunking, either ISL or
Dot1Q. That includes both the 1720 and 1750. In these cases, you had to
purchase a 2600 with IP Plus, which is an expensive proposition to avoid the
necessity of 2 or more E/FE
I'll try to explain this:
Think of a root port as the closest port to the root bridge on a given
BRIDGE. Think of a designated port as the closest port to the root bridge
on a given SEGMENT. This is the port used by all bridges on a given segment
to get to the ROOT. Consider the following
Yes and no. Gigastacks are FD when only one port is used. When you truly
stack with these GBICs, meaning one port is used for inbound and the other
for outbound, a show int will reveal a HD connection. As you notice in
ole's output, only one port is in use.
GigaStack module(0.2) in GBIC slot.
-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:43 PM
To: 'Rik Guyler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Gigastack Etherchannel [7:39033]
Hi Rik,
You're correct, and if you continue to read the rest of the e-mails
regarding this question, another question pop's up
George, you are an inspiration to us all. Thanks for the description of
your journey and congratulations!
Rik
-Original Message-
From: George Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE#8903 [7:37490]
All,
The title
You will need the updated IOS for this GBIC. Being a newer GBIC, the older
IOS won't recognize it so run the upgrade and it will work. To confirm
this, type sh int g0/1 (g0/2, etc..) and the output will tell you if the
GBIC is recognized or not.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Chuck
That's not good advice. An LX GBIC uses a laser transmitter, which is
powerful enough to burn a hole in your retina as a coworker of mine found
out. Besides, this is a copper GBIC so no light to see.
12.0(5.3) is a new enough IOS to recognize the copper GBIC so this version
will work on all of
Yes but there are caveats. You cannot do an all inclusive static mapping to
a PAT interface but you can redirect certain traffic based on port to
specific inside hosts.
For example, if you only have a single outside address and you are using it
on your outside interface, not only can you use
Another option would be Websense for PIX. This product will not only
authenticate the user but provide URL filtering and detailed reporting,
which the Proxy box doesn't do too well. I install this product frequently
and hear nothing but good about it from our customers.
Check out
I have seen this before. I don't remember the IOS versions in question but
it was an IOS bug. Try upgrading the IOS on the 35xx switches to the latest
version. Also, VTP domain is case sensitive, so when you set it on the
client, make sure you enter it correctly.
Rik
-Original
I wouldn't say this covers all of them but the most widely used IM apps.
This is used on a PIX and applied to the inside interface so modify as
necessary to fit your needs.
access-list inside deny tcp any any eq 1863
access-list inside deny tcp any any eq 5000
access-list inside deny tcp any any
I took the CIPT test and thought it not too difficult. This exam covers
primarily Call Manager and general voice technology. Fortunately for you
there are finally resources being published for Call Manager but hands-on
with the product will go a long way. CCO offers a demo version you can
A proctor graced our presence at my last ASET meeting and I asked him this
very question about which terminal emulator is used in the lab (I prefer
TeraTerm myself and am accustomed to the shortcuts). His response was that
they use Hyper Terminal exclusively so everybody better get to know it
You will get Windows boxes with the MS telnet client and Hyper Terminal.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Ozzie Sutcliffe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Easy ways to pick up a few extra minutes on th [7:35580]
So
Did you format the new flash? I've had issues with corruption adding flash
while existing flash is still installed. Try to boot to rommon mode and
format the flash. You should be able to do this with both sticks installed
without too much problem. Then install IOS, build the config, etc.
Rik
I considered those for my lab as well but Brad Ellis mentioned that they
won't run Enterprise IOS, which limits their value in your lab.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Unless this is a brand new change, the 515R certainly does support 3DES as I
have installed it many times on this firewall. The DES license is the only
FREE license but you can pay for the 3DES. The difference between the R
and U versions has to do primarily with interfaces (R=3, U=6) and
I can tell you that the last I knew, there were 3 companies manufacturing
GBICs for Cisco. You can buy from them direct as my company has done on
occasion. I was told that the difference in price was incredible but there
is a minimum order required. Unfortunately I don't know where we bought
Well, you're close. The tag will get removed if the VLAN information is
necessary in a given location (switch). In other words, the tag is only
permanently removed by the last switch to touch it before the frame
actually arrives at the final destination. If a given switch is not the
last
You will also need IP-Plus IOS for the trunking feature on the 2600.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VLan Ooops Part 2 [7:34687]
802.1q (dot1q) works on 10meg interfaces. I'm
Well, I've seen an R version and a U version but never a UR version.
I have always been under the assumption that they were mutually exclusive.
As for the lack of an activation key, that is odd. What is the current
version of the OS? Have you tried to run an upgrade? When you apply for a
The 4000 uses a very similar CLI to the 5000. The 4000 series is much newer
so some of the features are different plus the 5000 was considered a core
switch and the 4000 a closet switch. However, the 4000 is coming out of the
closet and some cool new features are being released such as Layer 3
Block both TCP and UDP port 5190. Check it out:
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~rakerman/port-table.html
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Walls Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: info on blocking aol im [7:34459]
Tom, I had this issue a few weeks ago and I tracked it down to Outlook inbox
rules. I deleted my rules and recreated them and now I only receive single
posts.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shameless plug? Absolutely! No shame in how Brad does business. :-}
Maybe he does have a financial interest but who cares? I have learned over
the years to listen to him...he is usually right. His simulator is as
inexpensive as you will find and I know he wouldn't offer it if it didn't do
Larry, you haven't given us much but maybe you don't have much. One thing
that may help ease the symptoms is to turn on portfast on the ports the
servers are connected. When the port does flap, it won't take so long for
it to begin forwarding again.
You didn't mention what type of cards the
Most PBXs are modular, at least to a degree and so you would most likely
have the choice to add a linecard to support E1 circuits.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dose PBX
A few days ago I started receiving duplicate emails from the Groupstudy.
Now I am receiving triplicate emails. Anyone else experiencing this?
---
Rik Guyler
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32204t=32204
--
FAQ
It's been more than once when I've encountered autonegotiation/autosense
issues between a Cisco router and Cisco switch. I've even seen problems
when both interfaces were 10/100 and both hard-coded to 100/full and the
link wouldn't come up. This may a chink in the Cisco armor as I rarely
Chuck, I can read the frustration in your post...I feel your pain. I have
to say I am surprised to hear that your experience with the new lab was not
a good one. If there is anybody I would say that about, it is you.
I hope you are planning a vacation from Cisco. Certainly you are tired. A
Dayton
Rik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 6:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ohio [7:26942]
I would like to know if there are any user on this board from Central Ohio.
Message Posted at:
Dude, you are SOOO the man! Congrats!
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]
Well as it would turn out it's my turn to write that awesome email... I
just got
Sure it's possible. No problemo. This is no different than connecting the
Cats together via single Gig links.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Washington Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2 sets of Gigabit Ethernet
Yes, but not by you. If the Voice provider is the same as the FR provider,
then the T1 could possibly be reprovisioned for a FR data circuit. In this
case, however, I would think most providers would prefer to just run another
circuit into your facility and then turn off the old one.
Rik
Priscilla, I'm going to open my mouth wide in preparation for my size 11
foot. while I agree with your core message, I tend to believe that you may
be looking at a typical modern network through rose colored glasses. For
example, I have been working with 3 small/medium (700-1000+ hosts) sized
Using a different IP subnet is the way to do it. The PIX treats this like a
virtual interface and has the intelligence built in to forward traffic
between the inside and the VPN address range.
Looking at your config, I agree with removing the conduit statement but I
don't believe that is
Yes to both. In the future, please check the archives at www.groupstudy.com
for the answers to such questions - they get asked many times over on a
regular basis.
Thanks,
Rik
-Original Message-
From: juno vtv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:30 PM
To:
Gosh Jenny, I don't have a clue but in the past I've had to reboot equipment
at times to make a few rare changes take full effect so maybe you're
correct. How much pain is involved in rebooting it?
Rik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:14 AM
To: 'Rik Guyler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: GBIC: WS-G5484 / WS-G5486 [7:22675]
Rik,
I appologize if this question is terribly stupid, but I have zero experience
with fiber
While I don't judge people by their mistakes, I do tend to judge them by how
they correct them. Was it Debbie's fault your systems went down? No. I
don't pretend to live in a world where malfunctions don't happen, but when
your systems take a crap you should be ready to deal with the fallout.
I agree with the pretty much always except when you want to load balance
over multiple paths. When multiple paths exist, fast switching moves data
on a per-destination basis and not a per-packet basis as process switching
does. Given different amounts of data will most likely be sent to
No. A quick look through the documentation reveals that bytes transferred
is not supported with the PIX.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Hans Schimek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco PIX Websense (Accounting) ?
I like Bruce's book - coverage of a very broad range of technologies. If
your only goal is to pass a test then this book may be all you really need.
If, however, yopu desire to learn how things work, then you will need to
supplement it. I suggest using Kennedy Clark's CCIE Switching book and of
Check the archives on www.groupstudy.com Some time ago, Chuck Larrieu
posted a CCO link for the Stratacom stuff you might need.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Donny Mateo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CID - WAN
Strange behavior indeed! I don't know if it's the same thing, but an old,
well-known bug with NT/Win2k and Catalysts is very similar. By connecting
an NT/Win2k serial port to the console port of a Cat when the PC is booting
will reset or freeze the switch. I have witnessed (in other words
In my area, telcos always provide the clock source. I have never had to
provide any form of clocking whatsoever. I am curious what type of router
is on the other side. If it's not Cisco, are you running PPP? If you had a
protocol mismatch, I wouldn't think layer 2 would even limp to up for 30
You have to instal the HTML content. The PDM (PIX Device Manager) is a
separate install from the OS.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Kevin McIntyre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX 515 firewall sample
impressions.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Brad Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alert: Some sort of IIS worm seems to be propagating
[7:20366]
John Kaberna, ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), sent me the following
. These
both can provide this type of access. In my office, for engineers providing
remote dialup support, we use a 2509 with an octal cable and external
modems. Works well and is a fraction of the cost of an AS box.
Good luck!
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Brian Whalen [mailto
Hmm...I don't know what the little hole is but accessing the console on a
6509 is just like any other device. Set your stop bits to 1 and give that a
try. 1 is the default setting for Cisco consoles.
Remember: 9600, 8, none, 1
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Thomas N. [mailto
cards cannot be forced into promiscuous mode.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Ed Horley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Adding NIC to the PIX ?? [7:17691]
Here is the link for the hardware portion:
http
to the 172.0.0
network as well. In this case it's not a big deal but if you use several
dozen or hundred access lists, having unnecessary extras may add noticeable
overhead.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:09 PM
Phil, can you elaborate on the whereabouts of this info? A link maybe?
Thanks
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: vpn through pix [7:17782]
If you have the time
Of course, how often is the root physically in the center? ;-}
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What's the diameter of your switched network? [7:17489]
Always
to be that the PPTP configs for the PIX on CCO were flawed.
Maybe this is still the same, maybe not.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 6:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN to PIX using Win2000 or Millennium?? [7:16452]
Hi
Does
Chuck, that's an excellent compilation of lab advice! I notice that most of
the esteemed contributors had common threads to offer, which I'll surely
heed when my time comes. Are you getting close to taking another stab at
the lab soon? I know I'd like to get a 4-digit number... ;-}
---
Rik
versions of PIX support port redirection, but again, I haven't confirmed
this.
Anyway, check them out.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 3:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Question [7:15518]
I have
you can't add a static without ports, I would suspect
corruption, possibly the image, flash, or whatever. Try imaging the box
with a fresh download of the PIXOS.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:22 PM
the xlate timeout to something a little more reasonable than 24
hours. Something like 30 or 60 minutes or even 10 minutes (my choice).
Keeping all of those translations around just ties up memory.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
If you have a CCO account with the correct permissions, you can download it.
Otherwise, talk to your local Cisco Account Manager for a demo or NFR
version.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Rick Holden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 9:04 PM
To: [EMAIL
.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Mohamed El Komy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 5:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCDA after CCNP, How tough [7:10960]
I also have same situation.I just finished my CCNP and i still whether it
worth to go through
, the
way to download software is to use the customer's account that was setup
with their SmartNet contract or a special download access code provided by
TAC.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Sam Deckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 1:00 AM
To: [EMAIL
. I like John's overall solution the best but if the
budget is limited, stay with the Proxy box and integrate it into the PIX
solution.
If you want content filtering, then go with
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: John Hardman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001
can't download any software with this account but you will gain access to
the private documents, resources, etc.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 9:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCO questions [7
server. It
comes as part of the IIS option pack for NT 4.0. I don't know where it's
setup on Win2k but I'm sure it's there somewhere as well. With this, you
could setup a backup RADIUS server.
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday
don't know what it gets you but it
exists. Before anybody asks, I don't have a clue how to get it, what it
gets you, etc. I just know it's available.
How do these things get started...? ;-}
---
Rik Guyler
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday
Shorted to pin 5
5 CTS Shorted to pin 4
6 Shorted to pin 8Output
7 GND -
8 CD Output
20 DTR Input
---
Rik Guyler
that, it sounds like you did most things right. If you stil
can't get it down, you might try posting your configs so the esteemed group
members may check 'em out!
---
Rik Guyler
Ciscofucious say: If you haven't checked the archives first, don't ask!
-Original Message-
From: cisco guru
These are generally remote access servers. Some call them RAS, some call
them NAS (network AS) but they're all the same thing for the most part. In
short, they provide access to the LAN via dial-up technology. These boxes
usually have digital modem cards (the better ones do anyway), which
Is this an Internet router or just an internal router running translation?
Unless you have static translates setup, NAT overload (PAT) will most likely
not allow inbound connections as it tracks ports for outbound and
established connections, not inbound connections. This is how you are able
to
That's because the crossover for a T1 is different than 56k. I believe that
the crossover you need is 1,2 - 7,8 but I'm not sure if my memory is working
all that well or not. Maybe someone else can confirm or deny this for us.
Or, if you really want to score points with the list, search on
Well, it's not necessarily true that a T1 circuit is a frame circuit. A T1
is simply the layer 1 technology. In other words, just a piece of wire more
or less. Frame relay on the other hand is a layer 2 technology. It will
typically run on T1 layer 1 technology but not always. There is a 56k
The ports on a sup engine are like any other comparable port - they can be
trunked.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Joe Morabito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: supervisor engine [7:9902]
Does anyone know if you can use the
Ummm...this is describing etherchannel, but you can do that also.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: jackxu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: supervisor engine [7:9902]
certainly u can,cisco 6509's supervisor engine provide
Well, since you say you have everything else accounted for, have you tried
rebooting the router? Subinterfaces and loopbacks tend to be rather
troublesome once setup. Deleting and changing these virtual interfaces
typically requires a reboot for the changes to take effect completely.
You might
Teraterm Pro is among the favorites of this group, myself included. Plus
it's free. Just search on Google for teraterm and you'll get to the site
easily.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:51 PM
To:
Dude, great job!
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passed CIT - Now a CCNP!! [7:6725]
I passed my final exam yesterday - CIT with a score of 919.
At last I have my CCNP.
Many thanks to
Great job!
-Original Message-
From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PASSED: CCNP SWITCHING 2.0 (BCMSN) [7:6501]
Passed today at 3:00 with a score of 879. 64 questions in 30 minutes.
Scoring Range 300-1000,
Friend, eh?!? Oh the humanity... ;-}
Well, you could set a static entry but why? The ARP table is designed to be
dynamic so that it doesn't grow to a large size and really create additional
overhead. Remember, before ARP does its broadcast search, the switch will
check the ARP cache. The
Congrats dude!
Rik
-Original Message-
From: thangavel vishnukumar mudaliar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passed CCIE Written [7:6113]
Hi all,
I passed CCIE written,Just narrowly escaped.Anyhow cleared it.Now left with
I think that what you have described is multi-layer switching.
As Howard has mentioned in past posts, L3S is simply a marketing term as is
wire-speed switching. Layer 3 Switching is simply a line card, typically in
a chassis-based system, that can make routing decisions (layer 3) using
Well George, since nobody else answered, I'll help here.
Your logic is a little backwards here. by lowering your MTU, you may remove
the label of baby giants on some of your data (now maybe they'll be giants),
but that is all. Actually, by doing this, you will cause (at least in
theory)
It is considered good form to leave VLAN1 only for management, although in
small networks, it may not be as "critical". In a large network, however,
doing this becomes very important. Here's some reasons why:
1) Keeps most/all SNMP traffic off of data VLANs
2) Adds an extra level of security,
But that just proves my point - you *can't* setup DNS server on a PIX, so it
becomes a non-issue with a PIX. Besides, I think everybody I know has done
something that they know not to be the best thing but do it because it is a
quick and easy solution.
Don't get me wrong - I like Linux. The
I'm having problems getting to the certificationzone website. Anybody else
experiencing this?
Rik
,
This mail was processed by Mail essentials for Exchange/SMTP,
the email security management gateway. Mail essentials adds
content checking, email encryption, anti spam, anti virus,
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
