Dan Penn wrote:
> Well, I just passed support and completed CCNP in one not-so-swift move.
> Without breaking the NDA I will say many of the questions were VERY
> nondescript as to what they were asking for. I really believe I passed
> because I got some lucky guesses on some of the questions.
Morgan Hansen wrote:
> Should I go directly for one of the CCNP exams or would I benefit from
> holding on to my CCNA, studying for the CCDA perhaps for the time being?
Consider the Vedic principle: "The highest first." As long as Cisco
continues to have no prerequisites for the CCIE exams, may
Historically, T1 and E1 are different from HDSL. However, they now use
HDSL in the US to provide 24-channel circuits on a single pair of
copper, as compared to the two pairs used for the traditional T1. I
wouldn't be surprised if a similar situation occurs with HDSL and E1.
Unfortunately, it's bee
Mike Bernico wrote:
> To prepare I used "MPLS and VPN architectures" by Ivan Pepelnjak and also
> "Advanced MPLS Design and Implementation" by Vivek Alwayn. The second book
> was much more pertinent to the test and I believe is being revised for
test,
> but check ciscopress.com for that.
The
Dan Penn wrote:
> I'm taking it this Wednesday, but if you check out the exam outlines for
> 506 and 606 from CCO they are the EXACT same word for word.
I'm taking it Friday or the week after. I hope you'll post a review
after you take it Wednesday. The Big Question I have is: Are they
testing
I just completed the CID exam last week with an 872. I followed the exact
advice Andy has given you (thanks for the recommendation Andy and Leigh
Ann). I read Top-Down Network Design and it is exceptional (both for the
test and for general knowledge). I also used Boson #1 (not great but
adequate)
have lots of study materials with which I continue to grow more comfortable.
Is this practice exam a realistic representation of the written?
TIA
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47517&t=47517
---
rement
day). When we sat the exam on 6/7 those who scheduled on 6/5 got 506, the
other 3 got 606.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WHEN WILL CCIE 350-001 EXPIRE [7:47184]
He/She
Frank Merrill wrote:
> Therefore, effective November 4th, 2002, the following topics will no
longer
> be tested on the CCIE Routing and Switching exam:
>
> IGRP
> Token Ring
> Token Ring Switching
> IPX
I wonder, will the new 640-60x tests drop IPX?
-- TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.g
Would it be accurate to say that the XML switch is located at the
edges of the network, possibly even that it is an endsystem with
routing functions? Would there be XML switches in the core network?
Where would it be located in the following diagram?:
http://vedatel.com/Java/j2ee-web-services.jpg
>From the hardcopy issue of InfoWorld (June 10, 2002, Issue 23, p. 43):
"Routing, the core technology of the Internet, is emerging as a way to
coordinate interaction among SOAP actors on a global scale. SOAP
routing is described in two of Microsoft's Global XML Architecture
specifications. WS-Rou
e
are additional materials that I may need to use or is TDND sufficient. Also
which of the boson's is most useful.
TIA
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46307&t=46307
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote:
> I sure as hell hope you aren't a teacher, or a CCSI - you need to rethink
> your attitude in addressing people, like many of us in this group, that are
> here to learn (notice you are subscribed to group"STUDY".com)
Amen. It's bad style for teachers or participan
Chris Dumais wrote:
> I completed my 7 month journey today to become a CCNP with the completion
of
> my CIT Exam. I got a lot of valuable information from this message board.
> Thanks for all of your input, it was very appreciated!
Congratulations.
Which version did you take: the old 640-506 or
Kris Keen wrote:
> Instead of all crying, just go and sit the exam. Who cares if your
> registered for 5x or 6x, you honestly thing they are different?
>
> The CCNP exams are a joke they are that easy, and if havent changed for 6xx
> then I'm really disappointed in Cisco.
>
> Is BRI and PRI diffe
:)
Now on to the lab!
Scott Chapin CCNP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45881&t=45881
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondi
Both sides send DDPs. The "more" bit is used in the exchange for each side
to inform the other if it has more information to send. See Doyle VOL. 1
for a good description of this process.
HTH,
Scott
CCIE #9340
""thinkworker"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&q
Whenever you are using the rif end to end.
""Nijhawan Akshay"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anyone know in what scenarios you need to configure 'multiring all'
on
> a token ring interface connected to the Cat 3900?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupst
That's the right CD, but a little out dated. You can use the most current
info. right of CCO by going to "technical documentation". The search
function is horrible so I would suggest learning exactly where things are.
HTH,
Scott
CCIE #9340
""Hunt Lee""
I've been reading about the extensions to OSPF and IS-IS that enable
traffic engineering in MPLS networks. Is there any documentation on
the experimental application of EIGRP to TE?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45627&t=45627
-
e the time) but could it be from
the electrical charge being created to erase the flash? These routers have
been in production for about 3 months now and I haven't heard a peep out of
them. They have been working like champs.
HTH,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mai
Brian Zeitz wrote:
> when the CCNP already exists, to make a similar track to it, that is
> what doesn't make sense. I don't think the CCIP was necessary; it's only
> my humble opinion. What about switching? The knowledge that someone
> gained from the CCNA is good enough for CCIP candidates?
Th
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> I am going to get the CCIP, only one test away BSCI and I can't pass it
> because I simply don't know IS-IS.
I wonder if the new BSCI book by Todd Lammle does a good job on ISIS?
How difficult were the other two parts (QoS/multicasting and whatever
specialty you
cho
Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555 wrote:
> I'm back to reading groupstudy after an eighteen month abscence. My
> CCNP/CCDP certs which I finished 12/2000 and 1/2001 are working wonders
> career wise, but I am doing a lot of carrier type stuff now and I've
> lined up projects that pretty much cover the
Any recommendations for good sources on MPLS?
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 8:58 PM -0400 5/27/02, Scott H. wrote:
> >I recently completed the CCIE lab exam (R&S) and have been contemplatin
eems
like a fun topic and I would love to learn MPLS. Any comments (except B.S.
cert bashing) welcome.
Scott
CCIE #9340
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45176&t=45176
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscriptio
ren't somebody you would want to work for anyway,
> but your principles don't exactly help you very much in paying the rent.
>
>
> ""Scott H."" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > If the HR people (or hiri
tart hearing enough of this kind of talk, then perception
> of the cert will inevitably start to change in a negative way. That, my
> friend, is the connection. It is an unfortunate reality of life that we
are
> judged based on the actions of our community. Call it
guilt-by-association,
Why does it always have to be a contest of who's is biggest? If this guy
thinks he can pass the lab then by all means take the class and give the lab
a shot. I'm sure Cisco would be happy to collect the money from him each
time he takes it. I guess what I'm trying to say here is take care of yo
s vermill wrote:
> Our chief weapon is suprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise
Our
> two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency Our
*three*
> weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost
> fanatical devotion to the Pope Our *four*...n
Thompson Alton wrote:
> Your comments are false and you sound very ignorant.
> I work with guys who have 20 years experience and to trouble shoot a
problem
> take months. This is because they don't know how the protocols work. How
> much money can a company afford to lose when production is downl
I can't seem to find anything about the Spanish Inquisition project on
the cisco.com website.
-- TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44906&t=44906
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstud
twork. Since I am not even a
> CCNA yet (maybe in a couple of weeks), I wanted to make sure I would not
> break something. I just substituted names and AS numbers. I am hopefully
> going to take advanced routing and learn more about the BGP soon after my
> test.
>
> Thanx,
> Ani
^[0-9]* is a little more complicated. This statement is saying to
permit zero or more instances of a number between 0 and 9. Do a search on
CCO for AS path filters and you should find some good info. to help you on
your way.
HTH,
Scott
CCIE #9340
""Anil Gupte"" wrote in mes
Is your DHCP server connected to this switch and are the workstations in
question and the DHCP server on the same subnet/VLAN. If not you need to use
ip helper addresses on the L3 device between them. Are any workstations able
to get DHCP addresses from the server? Is the DHCP scope active?
-
Selling 2 2501s w/ IOS 12.1 16/8 and 1 DTE/DCE cable. $600 including
shipping COD anywhere in the lower 48.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44121&t=44121
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
interface and don't forget to enable local policy
routing so you can ping from the router. That should take care of it.
HTH,
Scott
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, policy routing could very well be the solution wi
Mark,
If I'm reading your situation correctly, I think the problem
comes from the back-to-back FR link. We use 2600 routers in labs
to emulate FR switching between two or more FRAD routers, like
this:
R1/FRADR3/FRswchR2/FRAD
Since your goal is to get R1 and R2 to communicate in a
LA
"Kaminski, Shawn G" wrote:
> In your reply below, you're saying that "A half-duplex Ethernet interface
> (whether on a bridge, switch, router, server, or PC) monitors for a
> collision while sending. If a collision occurs, the interface (I assume
> you're talking about the interface on the router
Has anyone taken both of these troubleshooting exams: the CIT
certification exam and the Cisco Academy Semester 8 final? I'd like to
know how you compare them in difficulty, scope and any other
interesting features.
-- Thanks,
TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f
Sean Knox wrote:
> This might help:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/1575_pp.htm
>
> Goes over some MPLS terminology and concepts as well as the product lines
> needed to accomplish various roles on the MPLS network (CE, PE, P).
Thanks for the reference. Here's what the
.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/059600186X/qid=1020453510/sr=1-1/ref=
> sr_1_1/103-7458544-1431031
>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596000200/ref=pd_bndl_img_2/103-7458
> 544-1431031
>
> -dre
>
> ""Tom Scott"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">new
Scenario builders (and users),
If you're looking for scenarios that need attention,
consider network management (Semester 8 of the Cisco
Academy curriculum, for example). Using just a few cisco
routers (say, 2-4), one can build and use reasonably
simple scenarios. But there's a need for more comp
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
> I've
> always found it a graphic challenge that telephony really has two
> communications paths: the control/signaling path for call setup and
> the like, and the information transfer path.
Amen to that. Way back in the dark ages (early 1990's) I did
an FSM analys
Steven Pilkerton wrote:
> I have taken the router, switching and remote access exams, and am about to
> take the support exam. I have heard from some that the CIT exam is the
> easiest and I have heard from others that it is one of the hardest. I
would
> like to get the boards perspective on th
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Do you know about the "Cisco IP Telephony Network Design Guide" here:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/network/index.htm
Thanks for the reference. Oddly enough, I had it in my bookmarks. For
whatever reason
it didn't get through my
I'm reading Priscilla's "Top-Down Network Design". I recommend it as a
complement to the Semester 7 BCMSN books.
Is there a design strategy or methodology that I can use to diagram
application layers into the logical topology? The application I have
in mind is AVVID. Suppose the implementation wa
Marko Milivojevic wrote:
> Nuclear powers are generally not techincally illiterate. For
> example, question "are there any cisco routers in china? what are they used
> for?" implies that.
You paraphrase my message incorrectly. What I said was this: "tony, just
wondering,
do you have many
gic tony wrote:
> i am from beijing in china ,just find this forum ,browse for a while
> very good place .
tony, just wondering, do you have many cisco routers and switches in China?
what
models? where are they used? -- This is not a political question, only
technical
curiosity.
-- TT
Messa
2 2501s w/12.1 and 16/8 in good working condition. Console and DTE/DCE
include. $850 obo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42834&t=42834
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.g
Giles Funnell wrote:
> I've just replaced an old 10MB hub with a 2900 Catalyst Switch. All the
> connections are fine except for one. I have a relatively blank
> configuration with all the computers in one vlan. For this one
> connection I can't ping either the PC or the switch from the PC. T
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
> A more useful and lower-level concept idea than that of connections
> is state. State is the property that a host, router, etc., remembers
> something about a packet, message, physical link, etc., after it has
> transmitted the "something."
Another perspective on
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
> Not everything neatly falls into connectionless or
> connection-oriented, and, indeed, different functions in ICMP have
> different characteristics.
It would be an interesting exercise to list the characteristics of
connection-oriented connections (did I say that?)
Tom Scott wrote:
> From the GMPLS/CCAMP TE draft:
>
>Thus we have a more general notion of a TE link. A TE link is a
>"logical" link that has TE properties. The link is logical in a
>sense
>that it represents a way to group/map the information
>From the GMPLS/CCAMP TE draft:
Thus we have a more general notion of a TE link. A TE link is a
"logical" link that has TE properties. The link is logical in a
sense
that it represents a way to group/map the information about certain
physical resources (and their properties) into th
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
> >I'm serious. Is there any reason why MPLS cannot be transported directly
on
> >fiber,
> >perhaps even in time slots? Have the GMPLS and IPO WGs addressed this
issue?
> >
> >-- TT
>
> That's exactly what those two working groups are doing, and other
> groups in the
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> I passed it. Just read the 2 Cicso books, know ATM well, and use every
> other source you have.
I was hoping to get by with minimal ATM but I gather from what you say that
the
interworking of MPLS and ATM is considered a necessary part of the
ceritification.
Accord
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
> >Is there some reason that ATM is necessary for MPLS implementations in low
> >end Cisco products? It's been my understanding that VPI/VCI field usage
> >for labels in any implementation is generally not used. Every mpls
network
> >I've worked on used shim headers
ng that VPI/VCI field usage
> >for labels in any implementation is generally not used. Every mpls
network
> >I've worked on used shim headers which makes MPLS l2 agnostic.
>
> Not as far as I know. Should work even with an extra piece of tape on
> an RFC1149 transport.
>
RFC 2547 would be nice but not necessary. What I''d like is practice with
the paths,
basic things like that. Regarding the use of CEF, is that required? I was
hoping for
low-budget MPLS labs, maybe even down into the 1600 or 1700 Series. If one
were willing
to give up the efficiency of the CEF swi
Howard and scenario builders,
Do you have any MPLS labs that don't use ATM? Maybe combining low-end
(read "affordable") cisco routers and James Leu's "MPLS for LInux"
project?
-- TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42214&t=42214
---
You are correct. The flash will work on the 3600 router but not the DRAM.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Can 2600 series RAM/Flash be used in 3600 series routers?
[7:41643
us this command in the filter field
(ip.addr eq XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX and ip.addr eq XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX)
Replace the XXXs with the destination and source IP address. This will
filter all the other traffic besides the two stations.
HTH,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: group study [mailto:[EMAIL
Tim Champion wrote:
> I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used within
> our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in putting
> together this kind of document?
Good question. I hope someone takes the time to answer. Documentation is one
of the
most
Ismail Al-Shelh wrote:
> Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by monopolizing
the
> market.
Business is business. Specifying their own product is standard practice for
any vendor.
The pragmatic advice is to use Cisco whenever possible (that's a judgment
call, the
final decisi
"Ouellette, Tim" wrote:
> I've never heard of anything like that. YOu do have to be carefull with
> fiber though. I've got 10baset cables that are less than a foot and
> 100baset cables that are 10. I think there is a restriction (51.2
bittimes)
> for fast ethernet on the long end but nothing
I'm starting to understand CEF. I like what it does. But can
anyone refer me to a list of the pitfalls, or features, to
beware of? What are the problems with CEF and can I avoid
them with workarounds or careful planning and
configurations?
-- TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/fo
Internals fans,
I'm reading the book, "Inside Cisco IOS Software
Architecture" as background for chapter 7 of the Sem8
(troubleshooting) online CNAP curriculum. If you haven't
read it, I recommend it for anyone who wants to learn about
router components (buffers, memory, processors, switching
fab
This thread is taking an unhappy turn.
We're all friends here and there's plenty of money to be made. Every company
has its
good side and its bad side. Same for employees. I'm proud to consider myself
in the
cisco family, meaning, I've taken the 8-semester Cisco Academy courses and
I'm just
about
Georg Pauwen wrote:
> 4A collapsed backbone has high-bandwidth uplinks from all segments and
> subnetworks to a single device, such as a Gigabit switch, which serves as a
> single point for monitoring and controlling the network4.
>
> The following link contains a figure detailing the collapsed b
command syntax:
timeout [conn [hh:mm:ss]] [h323 [hh:mm:ss]] [rpc [hh:mm:ss]] [uauth
[hh:mm:ss]] [udp [hh:mm:ss]] [xlate [hh:mm:ss]]
conn hh:mm:ss Idle time until a connection slot is freed (default value is
12 hours). Use 0:0:0 for the time value to never time out a connection.
Manually:
ki
I apologize for previous incorrect information. (timeout conn)
Try this instead...
Cisco Secure PIX Firewall Documentation:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/index.htm
PIX Firewall Version 6.1 > Cisco PIX Firewall Command Reference
show telnet timeout
telnet timeout
-list 2 permit 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 2 deny any log
!
Cheers,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Johnson, Richard (NY Int)
Sent: 12 April 2002 14:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Disable Telnet [7:41293]
Hi All
I had a problem between two OSPF neighbors. Here is what I saw in the log:
OSPF-4_ERRRCV Received invalid packet: BAD Version
OSPF - Mismatch Authentication key - Message Digest Key 1
My question is what is meant by "Bad Version". Anyone seen this.
Tks,
Scott
[GroupStudy.com
url - watch the word wrap...
http://www.TWAcomm.com/Catalog/Dept_ID_108.htm?SID=30TSQJUWWJD58NH8URLJMR7T7BD4DH75
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you.
Scott Chapin, CCNP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41128&
Hi Chris,
The CCDA exam is a requirement to get your CCDP certification. You will have
to pass the CCDA and then CID, if you are already a CCNP, to achieve CCDP
status.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM
To
The first command will advertise the entire block. If you have other
interfaces in that block, they will be included. The second command says to
just advertise that interface.
HTH,
Scott
""Ruihai An"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I just took the BCMSN, and passed. Three down, one to go.
I think I must have missed most of the questions about
equipment, such as whether to use a 4000, 5000, 6000, 8000,
etc. That's definitely the weak link in my knowledge, not
only on the BCMSN but also for the BCRAN test. Can anyone
refer me
Chuck wrote:
> My employer has had us using the NetformX tool for a couple of years now.
> ( this is the software of which apparently Cisco is using a subset for
Cisco
> products only, according to what I saw on the web page )
I'll take a look at the NetformX. Thanks for the reference.
Have you
Check out these websites - I have not used them so I cannot tell you if they
are good products. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS?
http://www.linesimulators.com/telsim.shtml
http://www.digitalproductsco.com/ringit.htm
Thanks,
Scott Chapin, CCNP
On Saturday 06 April 2002 01:31 pm, you
My wife works for one of the companies that the folks at certifysky.com are
going to
hear from. If I were an owner of certifysky.com, I wouldn't answer the
phone. These
guys are in serious legal trouble if they're passing out information that is
protected
by non-disclosure agreements. The only peo
Smaller routers couldn't handle all these routes. Can anybody say "mushroom
cloud"?
""Lomker, Michael"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Why is redistribution into an IGP a big no - no? My
> > understanding is that this is what people usually do.
>
> You'd have
David C Prall wrote:
> The 2900XL does not support PAgP negotiation, so you have to configure the
> channel as on.
Related to this, can you refer me to an example at cisco.com that shows an
FEC between
a 2900 switch and 2600 router ("router-on-a-stick").
Suppose we had two vlans (10 and 20). I
To the Big Study Group Brain,
Quick question:
Which WAN encapsulation protocol has the least amount of overhead? PPP,
HDLC, FR or other?
Thank you for your opinions.
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40343&
this?
Thanks,
Scott
CCNP, CCDA
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> At 10:07 AM 4/2/02, Cebuano wrote:
> >Priscilla,
> >Maybe it's time to switch publishers like Howard's. Unless your upcoming
> >book prevents Cisco from doing what they did to TDND's contract.
&g
Does anybody know the command to use on an interface to see bridge numbers
in hex instead of decimal?
Thanks,
Scott
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39997&t=39997
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscript
good place to start for info on MPLS is the MPLS Forum and
MPLS Resource Center:
http://www.mplsforum.org/
http://www.mplsrc.com/
-- TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39952&t=39950
--
FAQ, list archives, and su
-Original Message-
From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Router question.. [7:39788]
Hi all,
My boss just come up and give me a senario question like this. He told me
that I owned a company which uses 3 differen
Any comments would be appreciated.
Scott Chapin, CCNP
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 12:43 pm, you wrote:
> Does anyone know of a good ISDN simulator ? I have a co-worker who bought a
> Teleos Switch, but documentation is not easy obtainable and it appears a
> complex device. Since the Teleos s
Has anyone who has taken the CID exam used the Cisco CID Exam Certification
Guide. (Michael Crane, Reggie Terell). I was wanting to
get some opinions on this book, especially the practice test on the CD. I
intend to use BOSON as well.
Thanks,
Scott
CCNP, CCDA
[GroupStudy.com removed an
All,
I get the error message "%Remove legacy DDR Configuration first" when I try
to switch from legacy DDR to dialer profiles. I thought
I removed all the legacy DDR statements first but I still get this error
message. Anyone ever see it?
Thanks,
Scott
[GroupStudy.com removed an att
.
int fa1/0.100
ip address (the subnet of the vlan)
encap isl (the vlan #)
HTH,
Scott
""George Siaw"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Do I need an Sc0 port when routing between Vlans? However, there's no
> uplink module on neit
Kent, Irwin,
This is an interesting exchange of perspectives. Could you
or someone else comment on GMPLS? How does it factor into
the comparison of MPLS vs. FR? Is there anything about the
combination of MPLS / GMPLS that gives it an advantage over
FR?
Another issue I'd like to understand in thi
Thinkworker and other MPLS fans,
MPLS does not route; it's a switching or forwarding
technology. How does MPLS get it's routing information?
Usually from a dynamic routing protocol, either BGP for
inter-domain routing or an IGP (IS-IS, OSPF, RIP, EIGRP) for
intra-AS routing.
That's the simple, u
have looked in a gazillion used
router shops, E-Bay, Google searches, etc. to no avail.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Scotty
--
Scott Nelson
1.202.270.8968
mailto:scottnelson at bnmnetworks dot net
Message Posted at:
http
As long as you're talking about .Net, you might should have
a look at J2EE. Eventually they'll probably interwork but
now there seems to be a big difference.
I'm working on a report to compare Cisco's e-commerce with
J2EE. They're essentially dealing with the same thing, only
from different persp
[Question] 1. in FR, when we specify clock rate for 64k, we
use clock rate 64000, why
not 64 x 1024 = 65536 ? and for 1.544 mbps, we use 148000,
why not 1.544 x
1024 x 1024 ?
Partial answer: Transmission speeds are in bits per second
(temporal), storage is in bytes (spatial), although you'll
find
The one book I'm reading is from ciscopress: Cisco ATM
Solutions, by Galina Pildush
The next question is, How does a cash-challenged individual
such as myself set up an ATM lab in his basement? Someone
mentioned the LS-100 in a previous message. What are the
going prices on that? Also, can I find
and I have looked in a gazillion used
router shops, E-Bay, Google searches, etc.
Thanks in advance for any help anyone can offer.
Scotty
--
Scott Nelson
1.202.270.8968
mailto:scottnelson at bnmnetworks dot net
Message Posted
Regarding the above URL, it specifies: "Certifications: Cisco's CCNP &
CCDP, and those studying for the CCIE Lab Written Exam." Does that
include CCIP even though it's not listed? If not, where should we post
the CCIP threads?
Cheers,
-- TT
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/r
201 - 300 of 836 matches
Mail list logo
