RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62752]

2003-02-10 Thread Andrew Larkins
- warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62749] Andrew, Of interest is that the RSA key was generated sometime after my reboot of the router. It looks like PDM (because this was the only way I could access the device) created a new key for me or at some point... Not sure when... Anyway

RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62749]

2003-02-10 Thread Jens von Bülow
during a power cycle? Regards Jens -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 February 2003 02:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62747] The RSA key pair is generated when you want to enable SSH access t

RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62747]

2003-02-10 Thread Andrew Larkins
drew Larkins; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62743] That is what I suspect or perhaps an overzealous engineer. Does one specify the RSA key for SSH (is it the same as the one for the IPSEC stuff) How would one change such a thing? I don&

RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62745]

2003-02-10 Thread Jens von Bülow
that the key once again changed - could this problem be as a result of a corrupt flash card? -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 February 2003 01:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62743]

RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62743]

2003-02-10 Thread Andrew Larkins
ry 2003 12:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pix: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62737] Greetings, [jens@workstation jens]$ ssh @@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION H

pix: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62737]

2003-02-10 Thread Jens von Bülow
Greetings, [jens@workstation jens]$ ssh @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be

OT OT Friday Funny Warning for Oct 28th [7:23523]

2001-10-19 Thread Paul Trygar
WARNING Don't go to the bathroom on October 28th! CIA intelligence reports that a major plot is planned for that day. Anyone who takes a poop on the 28th will be bitten on the ass by an alligator. Reports indicate that organized groups of alligators are planning to rise up into unsuspe

Re: 12.2(5) on 2600 - Warning [7:23448]

2001-10-18 Thread Thomas
I just hope that this doesn't affect the 3600 and 2500 series router. I just upgraded a 2509 and 3620 with this 12.2(5) version. ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I decided to remotely upgrade a 2620 up to 12.2(5) today and ran into a > particul

OT: 12.2(5) on 2600 - Warning [7:23448]

2001-10-18 Thread John Neiberger
I decided to remotely upgrade a 2620 up to 12.2(5) today and ran into a particularly nasty feature. It appears that it may have something to do with FRTS, but I'm not certain. With no circuit connected the router would boot just fine. If it boots with the frame relay T1 connected, it will get a

RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19191]

2001-09-09 Thread Shahid Muhammad Shafi
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Tony Medeiros > Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 2:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE > (Warning !!! longish ) > [7:19098] > > > I have to agree with many, if not all the po

RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19188]

2001-09-09 Thread Lou
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19098] I have to agree with many, if not all the points raised by everybody. My humble take is that there are 4 types of knowledge a great, capable of hands on, design, etc. network engineer should have i

RE: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19115]

2001-09-08 Thread Chuck Larrieu
on of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19098] I have to agree with many, if not all the points raised by everybody. My humble take is that there are 4 types of knowledge a great, capable of hands on, design, etc. network engineer should have in the perfect world. CCIE or not. Bear in mind that

Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19105]

2001-09-08 Thread George Yiannibas
Tony All good points in your post. As you wrote NOBODY knows anything and if you continue to believe that after geting your CCIE there is great future for you because you will never cease to learn and to develop both personally and profesionally. I am currently studying for CIT and IMHO it is real

Re: One Journalist's Opinion of CCIE (Warning !!! longish ) [7:19098]

2001-09-08 Thread Tony Medeiros
I have to agree with many, if not all the points raised by everybody. My humble take is that there are 4 types of knowledge a great, capable of hands on, design, etc. network engineer should have in the perfect world. CCIE or not. Bear in mind that I am talking about a network engineer that basi

Re: Warning about yahoogroups.com [7:14094]

2001-07-30 Thread Michael L. Williams
I sent an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I no longer get these messages. Mike W. "J. Li" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe Yahoo bought egroups and changed it > yahoogroups. I hate people adding me to the list > without my permission. What is more terr

Re: Warning about yahoogroups.com [7:14094]

2001-07-30 Thread Paul Borghese
> > add addresses without the requirement of an authentication message. > > > > Take care, > > > > Paul Borghese > > - Original Message - > > From: "J. Li" > > To: "Paul Borghese" ; > > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:0

Re: Warning about yahoogroups.com [7:14094]

2001-07-30 Thread Patrick Bass
llow anyone to create a mailing list and > add addresses without the requirement of an authentication message. > > Take care, > > Paul Borghese > - Original Message - > From: "J. Li" > To: "Paul Borghese" ; > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:06 PM &g

Re: Warning about yahoogroups.com [7:14094]

2001-07-30 Thread Paul Borghese
uot;J. Li" To: "Paul Borghese" ; Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 4:06 PM Subject: Re: Warning about yahoogroups.com [7:14094] > > I believe Yahoo bought egroups and changed it > yahoogroups. I hate people adding me to the list > without my permission. What is more terrible

Re: Warning about yahoogroups.com [7:14094]

2001-07-30 Thread J. Li
I believe Yahoo bought egroups and changed it yahoogroups. I hate people adding me to the list without my permission. What is more terrible is that a guy created a group list in Yahoogroups and added another e-mail list (which I'm subscribed to) to his list. I can NOT even un-subscribe from his

Warning about yahoogroups.com [7:14094]

2001-07-29 Thread Paul Borghese
Some dimwit created a cisco group at yahoogroups and has been subscribing people who have posted from this list to the group. If this has occurred to you, please protest to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe we can get this guy shutdown. Frankly I am amazed Yahoo will allow your e-mail address to be put o

Virus/Worm Warning [7:8833]

2001-06-16 Thread Paul Borghese
I have been receiving a report of a worm being sent to people as a reply from the list. At least one person on the list is infected with the badtrans worm and may be spreading to others (this person has been removed from the list). Here is a link for more information: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The

virus warning [7:4165]

2001-05-11 Thread David Kurnik
Paul/All, Note the infected email I received after I posted on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I advised the sender, but I thought you would want to know. Below is the text of the email, note the name of the attachment. I have no idea what it does. --David > 'David Kurnik' wrote: - Though there a

Re: Cisco issues profits warning 2 [7:842]

2001-04-17 Thread GNOME
haha.maybe it is good for me if the sales is poor at least there will not be worldwide shortage for parts and all my 3 x Cat6506, 3 x 7507 routers can arrive faster :P "Ian Gomeche" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > don't know where the link went on my last

Cisco issues profits warning 2 [7:842]

2001-04-16 Thread Ian Gomeche
don't know where the link went on my last post so here is the whole story ian Monday, 16 April, 2001, 21:05 GMT 22:05 UK Cisco warns of lower earnings 'Difficult business decisions': Cisco's John Chambers After the US markets closed on Monday, Silicon Valley's largest company, Cisco Systems,

Cisco issues profite warning [7:836]

2001-04-16 Thread Ian Gomeche
ian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=836&t=836 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Private Internet Addressing Warning! Off topic

2001-02-25 Thread Craig Lindstrom
Warning OFF TOPIC Funny, my family owns a heating and air-conditioning business and the normal way to look for a natural gas leak is with a match! In fact the gas company used to give us these little candles that were about a foot long to use to check. The only time I didn't use a light

*WARNING* CATALYST "BUG" MEMORY LEAK VULNERABILITY

2001-01-29 Thread RAUL RENTERIA
es. >6009, 6006, 6509, 6509-NEB, and 6506 modular chassis switches. **WARNING** THE FIX SOFTWARE VERSION FOR CATALYST 4000 MODEL 5.5(4b) HAS A "POWER REQUIREMENT". IT NEEDS 2 POWER SUPPLIES TO RUN AT ALL TIMES; OTHERWISE IT WILL REMOVE "OFF-LINE" "ALL" THE MODULES INSE

Re: Warning!!

2001-01-10 Thread John Neiberger
> If someone really needs the web-based mail interfaces of a > hotmail-type service rather than using POP3 with any of a number of > email clients (including browsers), I'd really be uncomfortable with > them configuring my routers. > > Believe me, someone who posts from an anonymous acc

RE: Warning!!

2001-01-10 Thread Jennifer Cribbs
> > > > > You know, this is something I personally have never even though about...at > > least from the aspect of your e-mail address. But it makes absolute > sense. > > Because being new myself, I have already leaned there are some people you > > just don\'t open and then there are some that yo

RE: Warning

2001-01-10 Thread Jennifer Cribbs
> > You know, this is something I personally have never even though about...at > least from the aspect of your e-mail address. But it makes absolute sense. > Because being new myself, I have already leaned there are some people you > just don\'t open and then there are some that you learn

Re: Warning!!

2001-01-10 Thread Control Program
Thank you, Howard. I was beginning to wonder if I was the only one left who remembers why it's bad form to post such detritus to Internet news and mail lists. Perhaps filtering hotmail-style services would cut down on the number of HTML-encrusted posts as well, a disturbing trend that seems to b

Re: Warning!!

2001-01-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
I'm really bothered by posts from anonymous or unverifiable email addresses that slam companies, countries, authors, immigration policies, and rumors about planned Cisco attacks. When I make a public post, there's no question who is making it. Is this Berkowitz just being crotchety, or does t

Warning!!

2001-01-10 Thread Richard Jackson
>Hello, > >I am sending out this message because I think that people need to be aware >of certain companies looking to recruit from the US and Canada. > >I am writing specifically about Axioma in the Netherlands. I've seen some >other postings on this web site about them. Some bad flames and so

Warning for all looking for employment international!!!

2001-01-09 Thread John Doe
Hello, I am sending out this message because I think that people need to be aware of certain companies looking to recruit from the US and Canada. I am writing specifically about Axioma in the Netherlands. I've seen some other postings on this web site about them. Some bad flames and some i

RE: % Warning: cannot change link type

2000-12-13 Thread Coker, Michael
d of any others. --Mike -Original Message- From: Maccubbin, Duncan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/13/00 7:47 AM Subject: RE: % Warning: cannot change link type then tried to delete it and bring it back up as a point-to-point. You will get this error with 11.x IOS. Delete the interface

Re: % Warning: cannot change link type

2000-12-13 Thread Greg Smythe
--- From: "les flack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 5:55 AM Subject: % Warning: cannot change link type Help, I have a 3600 @ 11.3 which is running as a frame switch on some ports and I am trying to c

Re: % Warning: cannot change link type

2000-12-13 Thread John Neiberger
switch on some ports > and I am trying to configure some of the other ports as routed > point-to-point sub-ints. > > But when configuring the second sub int I get the following. > > frsw1(config)#int s0/0.1 point-to-point > frsw1(config-subif)#exit > frsw1(config)#

RE: % Warning: cannot change link type

2000-12-13 Thread Maccubbin, Duncan
PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 8:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: % Warning: cannot change link type Help, I have a 3600 @ 11.3 which is running as a frame switch on some ports and I am trying to configure some of the other ports as routed point-to-point sub-ints. But when

% Warning: cannot change link type

2000-12-13 Thread les flack
frsw1(config)#int s0/0.2 point-to-point % Warning: cannot change link type Which results in the following configuration interface Serial0/0 no ip address no ip mroute-cache encapsulation frame-relay ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point no arp frame-relay ! interface Serial0/0.2 multipoint no

WARING WARNING

2000-09-19 Thread NSU
Do not waste money or time on BFQ (Quizer) http://www.bfq.com Most of the questions are from the old course and not from the CISCO BSCN course material. I have the official CISCO material ( attended the training ) and they are referring to a old Course material and at the same time telling that

Re: -=WARNING=-

2000-09-07 Thread Dale Cantrell
quot;Bessette, Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Bessette, Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: -=WARNING=- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 14:30:17 -0600 Someone internal to our corp has released another var

-= WARNING=-

2000-09-07 Thread Bessette, Jesse
THERE is no need to be alarmed, someone email bombed my system with a fake version of the I LOVE YOU virus.. false alarmsorry to scare everyone.         Jesse Bessette PC Architecture MCP, TCP/IP Administator 303-689-6931 Http://www.virtualcircuit.com  

Re: -=WARNING=-

2000-09-07 Thread andy lennon
what is in the subject field? andy ""Bessette, Jesse"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Someone internal to our corp has released another varient of the Love letter virus. I found over 120 copies in my inbox when i returned after lunch. Ive delete

-=WARNING=-

2000-09-07 Thread Bessette, Jesse
Someone internal to our corp has released another varient of the Love letter virus. I found over 120 copies in my inbox when i returned after lunch. Ive deleted all found and have the latest dat which should take care of it. I do not believe any were sent to the listserv.         Jesse Bes

[Fwd: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours]

2000-06-26 Thread H. Karim
** ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** ** The original message was received at Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:56:00 -0400 from