lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 12 augustus 2003 19:38
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Line Redundancy [7:73931]
Hi all,
I need some Line or Internet redundancy for a relatively small network.
We currently have a SDSL line from speakeasy which resells Covad.
I need another ty
Hi all,
I need some Line or Internet redundancy for a relatively small network.
We currently have a SDSL line from speakeasy which resells Covad.
I need another type of line that would remain up if this line went down
as it recently did. Now they believe me about redundancy!
To my
)
M:N N backups for M active resources.
>
>""Lo Ching"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Dear All,
>>
>> What's the meaning of N+1 redundancy? I found a chassis switch with 4
>power
>> supply and it states N+1 power redund
ROTECTED]
> Dear All,
>
> What's the meaning of N+1 redundancy? I found a chassis switch with 4
power
> supply and it states N+1 power redundancy.
>
> Thanks.
>
> rgds,
> Lo Ching
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72213&t=72202
Dear All,
What's the meaning of N+1 redundancy? I found a chassis switch with 4 power
supply and it states N+1 power redundancy.
Thanks.
rgds,
Lo Ching
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72202&t=72202
---
s wallet.
We'll be paying for monitoring and service on this part of the network in
the future!
But can redundancy ever really be fail-safe? Something is bound to be a
single point of failure, eh?
OK, back to work now. It sure is nice to have high-speed Internet access
back, though, so I can w
Hi guys,
Sorry if this question is too amateurish, but I am clueless on how to
solve this problem.
The story is like this - I have a 7204VXR router connected to a 45 Mbps
satellite downlink via a HSSI interface. I have a PA-2FE-TX module on
the router and currently Fa1/0 (IP: 10.1.1.254) is conne
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Adam Frederick wrote:
> How could you enable redundancy in this scenario? Since PRI is a digital
> signal what happens if there is power problems at the CO? It's not like
good
> old analog lines I would assume. Usually where I'm located, if your T1 is
call routing is enabled. At
each branch, there are currently 4 copper lines used as a pool for local
dialtone.
The proposed solution is replace each branches 4 copper lines w/ PRI for
caller id issues in the corporation.
Question to you guys:
How could you enable redundancy in this scenario? Since P
Comments inline...
--- Eric W wrote:
> Dear Cisco Fans and Professionals,
>
> I need some friendly advice. There are different
> opinions about
> Cat6500(High availibility with Single Router Mode)
> and (High availibility
> with Dual MSFC Redundancy)
>
> Imagi
x27;m curious... is the 65007 a James Bond switch? :-)
Ken
>>> "Eric W" 11/28/02 04:47PM >>>
Dear Cisco Fans and Professionals,
I need some friendly advice. There are different opinions about
Cat6500(High availibility with Single Router Mode) and (High
availibilit
Dear Cisco Fans and Professionals,
I need some friendly advice. There are different opinions about
Cat6500(High availibility with Single Router Mode) and (High availibility
with Dual MSFC Redundancy)
Imagine you had 3 Cat65007s with Dual MSFC1 and Dual Supervisor1A.
That is 6 MSFC's
is no other path (according to the mentioned diagram). How r u
planning to acheive redundancy in this situation unless u have link between
the 2 remote offices?
U can run Multi group HSRP to achieve load balancing between the 2 remote
offices.
Hope this helps.
Rgds,
Vamsi
- Original Me
d right now. We'd like to setup a solution at
> those two sites
> that will load balance across two T1's and be redundant.
>
> I don' think true redundancy throughout can be done but here's
> what I can
> come up with:
>
> OSPF on routers A,B,C and D wit
.
I don' think true redundancy throughout can be done but here's what I can
come up with:
OSPF on routers A,B,C and D with equal cost paths on routers C and D to
routers A nd B. I've never setup HSRP like this before and I was wondering
if there is anything tricky about the OSPF config
. Don't have access to internet / documentation
right now but it would be done under each 'interface' ie. Fastethernet 0/2
etc
Thanks
Manish
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 12:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dual Link red
Off of the top of my head, I'd say something like this:
interface FastEthernet 0/1
channel-group 1 mode [auto | desirable | on]
interface FastEthernet 0/2
channel-group 1 mode [auto | desirable | on]
interface Port-Channel 1
HTH,
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/for
m: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 July 2002 12:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dual Link redundancy [7:47854]
Can't I use the port group 1 distribution destination on both switches ???
I tried using set trunk ... but the switch did'nt understand the command ...
the
PM
Subject: RE: Dual Link redundancy [7:47854]
> Configure both links as trunks then form an ether-channel. Both links
will
> pass traffic but a failure of one will not affect the other.
>
> Cisco Example:
> set trunk 1/1 dot1q on
> set trunk 1/2 dot1q on
>
> set
therChannel as a trunk . . ."?
Mike W.
"Mark Odette II" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yeppers! Without Trunking, you can't perform the redundancy.
>
> What VLANS you decide to carry across those trunks are your
No... you don't. You can simply configure an Etherchanell that only carries
VLAN1 only if you want more than 1 VLAN on the switches to you need a
trunk.
Mike W.
"Kohli, Jaspreet" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Do we need to setup trunks if we have default
Yeppers! Without Trunking, you can't perform the redundancy.
What VLANS you decide to carry across those trunks are your choice.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kohli, Jaspreet
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
Do we need to setup trunks if we have default VLAN1 running only .
-Original Message-
From: Chris Harshman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 July 2002 6:59 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Dual Link redundancy [7:47854]
Configure both links as trunks then form an
Check out Fast Etherchannel
(watch for wrapping)
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/techno/media/lan/ether/channel/tech/fe
tec_wp.htm
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dual Link redundancy
Configure both links as trunks then form an ether-channel. Both links will
pass traffic but a failure of one will not affect the other.
Cisco Example:
set trunk 1/1 dot1q on
set trunk 1/2 dot1q on
set port channel 1/1-2 on
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47866
I have two switches that will be connected over fibre ... two connections at
each end (hope you like the top Ascii art :))
| 1 |---| 1 |
| A | | B |
|_2 _|---|_2_ |
How can I fix it so that if A1-B1 goe
Hi,
You can use multiple 'radius-server host' or 'tacacs-server host' commands
to specify multiple hosts. The software searches for hosts in the order you
specify them.
Example:
radius-server host RADIUS1
radius-server host RADIUS2
If RADIUS1 is down, RADIUS2 will be contacted. The same for T
Sure. AFAIK, you can simply specify more than one TACACS server in your
config and it should attempt to contact each server in the order you enter
them.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35064&t=35043
--
FAQ
folks, does TACACS+ supports authentication backup? say client tries to
authenticate in NAS-1 but NAS-1 is down, it then goes to a backup NAS-2? is
this possible? I can't find any info from CCO.
also does Radius support the same backup scheme?
thnx
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/
need to create 2 route lists in CM.
> First choice would be WAN. 2nd choice would be PSTN. Add both to a route
> group.
>
>
> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Need some advice on the redundancy fea
ll,
>
> Need some advice on the redundancy features of CallManager. One of my
> customers is asking about the redundancy features of CM - he is thinking
of
> putting 2 CM servers at a main site providing local server redundancy,
> however, there will be a third CM server at a remote site whi
Dear All,
Need some advice on the redundancy features of CallManager. One of my
customers is asking about the redundancy features of CM - he is thinking of
putting 2 CM servers at a main site providing local server redundancy,
however, there will be a third CM server at a remote site which
If you want the MSCFs to act as identical units where one backs up the
other, then convert to Native IOS. Once using Native IOS, it's a piece of
cake to set it up as you asked (i.e. one sits in standby and kicks in when
the other fails like on a 7500)
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
perational-status: ON
>
> cairvndtr>sh red
> Designated Router: 1 Non-designated Router: 2
>
>
e is a 1750 DSL router
to the Internet. Behind that there is a PIX 506, and behind the PIX there is
a 2600 going via ISDN/384k to site A. SiteB connects to A via ISDN, and C
goes to A via 384k.
The main goal is to provide redundancy in case either the 384k or the ISDN
links were to fail through the I
How is the traffic coming back ?
:-))
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Dennis wrote:
>
> > Why don't you just route traffic to the headquarters over the frame and
> > internet traffic over other link? This could be done with static routes
or
> > through the use of a dynamic protocol such as ospf. If you r
Yeah just do this and perhaps a higher metric default to the hq office to
get net traffic to go there if the local goes down.
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Dennis wrote:
> Why don't you just route traffic to the headquarters over the frame and
> i
Why don't you just route traffic to the headquarters over the frame and
internet traffic over other link? This could be done with static routes or
through the use of a dynamic protocol such as ospf. If you require a more
specific answer you'll need to be more specific with the question. Posting
Howdy folks, I was wondering if any of you have used any tricks that I have
not though of for redundant routing to two internet sources. We have one
remote office that uses their own ISP via default route but also connects to
us over frame relay. Our headquarters has ISP connectivity of its own wh
twork??
ccie1ab
-Original Message-
From: Thomas N. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redundancy between 6506 with a single sup. eng. each box?
[7:25028]
Hi Group,
I have this scenario and wonder if it is possible to setu
your odd
vlans go to dist switch #2 and fail to dist switch #1. That way, you're
load balancing all access switches between both dist switches AND providing
redundancy. The only "price" you pay is having 2 connections from each
access switch instead of one.
http://www.cisco.com/wa
Go and buy that second sup!! If you read your post you answer your
own question!!
Dave
"Thomas N." wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I have this scenario and wonder if it is possible to setup the topology
with
> redundancy. I have a CAT 6509 acting as the core switch (say
: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redundancy between 6506 with a single sup. eng. each box?
[7:25028]
Hi Group,
I have this scenario and wonder if it is possible to setup the topology with
redundancy. I have a CAT 6509 acting as the core switch (say switch A),
and
Hi Group,
I have this scenario and wonder if it is possible to setup the topology with
redundancy. I have a CAT 6509 acting as the core switch (say switch A),
and 2 other CAT 6506 acting as the distribution switches (say switch B and
C). Both switch B and C have fiber uplinks to core switch A
You can use HSRP for Layer 3 redundancy. But, spanning tree is still going
to be an issue since one of the links will be put into blocking mode. By
using uplinkfast you will get 3 second convergence for a change. By doing
half of the vlans on each 4908 only half of your network will feel this and
I think you misunderstood me .
I don´t want to use a spanning tree.
Isn´t there a more sophisticated way to build a redundancy ?
Thanks
A.Herkenrath
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9772&t=9757
--
F
dcp.dcptech.com
- Original Message -
From: "Andri Herkenrath"
To:
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 8:00 AM
Subject: Redundancy with 4908 [7:9757]
> I have two 4908 band a bunch of 3548s.
> each 3548 is connected to both 4908.
> I want to set up a fast working redundancy and
I have two 4908 band a bunch of 3548s.
each 3548 is connected to both 4908.
I want to set up a fast working redundancy and load sharing.
Has anyone a idea how to perform this task ?
P.S Spanning tree isn´t fast enough
Greetings
A.Herkenrath
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
nal Message-
From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
Right now I'm dealing with a situation in which my company has two redundant
frame relay links to Botany Australia. One through
ley J. Wilson"
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
> Right now I'm dealing with a situation in which my company has two
redundant
> frame relay links to Botany Australia. One through Sprint, and the other
> through AT&T. We
satellite link or
whatever, but *something* is amiss here
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
The world is a single point of failure. :->
Seriously, something often ov
same backbone
provider. When that provider had a failure, both ISP's were down ( along
with several others in the area, all of whom used this same Tier 1 as their
backbone )
If the customer really does require "absolute complete redundancy" then you
and they should be doing a lot of resea
Here is a link on HSRP and understanding it:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs009.htm#xtocid122331
>From: "Andy Barkl"
>Reply-To: "Andy Barkl"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17
>I have a client who needs "absolute" complete redundancy for their Internet
>service.
At one level, I will say that I discuss a great many options in
redundancy fromt he enterprise side in my book, "WAN Survival Guide."
But let me also quote from Chapter 7 of
same telco path.
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Andy Barkl wrote:
> I have a client who needs "absolute" complete redundancy for their Internet
> service.
>
> I assume they should be using 2 separate links with different
I have a client who needs "absolute" complete redundancy for their Internet
service.
I assume they should be using 2 separate links with different ISPs. What I
don't have hands-on experience with is the physical connections and HSRP.
Will I connect both routers to the local
Just a quick recommendation, get the Halabi's BGP book. It's indeed the
bible for configuring BGP and I am sure you can figure things out with that
book.
Richard
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7463&t=7463
--
FAQ
manual
switch over between the T3 and T1 for backup since we
use the default and static route.
We are in the process of implemeting BGP4 for load
balacing and redundancy. Can someone shed me some
light on the best way to implement BGP across these
three link for redundancy and load sharing/balancing
ly to break than routers. So adding lots of router
redundancy follows diminishing returns when it's your single WAN link that
fails most.
Don't put too much faith in telcos providing redundant paths - a couple of
weeks ago 'Bob the backhoe man' dug up some cables and took out all c
ly to break than routers. So adding lots of router
redundancy follows diminishing returns when it's your single WAN link that
fails most.
Don't put too much faith in telcos providing redundant paths - a couple of
weeks ago 'Bob the backhoe man' dug up some cables and took out all c
> >
> > Mike W.
> >
> > "Jon" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > I've been reading about designing physical redundancy into networks,
by
> > > having hot standby devices and using HSRP between
th
> trying to connect 2 routers to a single WAN connection..
>
> My 2 cents
>
> Mike W.
>
> "Jon" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I've been reading about designing physical redundancy into networks, by
>
...in an attempt to torch the straw man...
We could talk at length about the pros and cons of the straw man you
present; if I understand the main question at hand the question is how to
provide some redundancy to the WAN link.
Short answer is that real-world solutions would include some type of
takes place).
i hope this is helpfull...
BTW Please don`t ask me about CSU/DSU clocking as it was a BT leased line
CSU/DSU and all i did was rip the cable apart and duplicate it ...
Sorry
steve
>From: "Jon"
>Reply-To: "Jon"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subjec
like
a good method to me for providing redundance without having to mess with
trying to connect 2 routers to a single WAN connection..
My 2 cents
Mike W.
"Jon" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've been reading about designing physica
s and
solutions, rather than ways to buy more gear. I'm also not trying to
solve the WAN redundancy problem, just trying to get the WAN to connect
into my LAN redundancy solution.
The fundamental problem I'm trying to solve is how to protect against any
hardware failure of my core de
: Redundancy design question [7:6646]
Well, you have pinpointed the problem with many redundant campus network
designs. They may not be redundant into the WAN.
To meet your goals, you may need a backup WAN connection of some sort.
Depending on the level of performance you want for the backup and
be affected by construction,
flooding, ice storms, trucks hitting telephone poles, Bob the back-hoe
operator, etc.
Priscilla
At 03:09 PM 5/31/01, Jon wrote:
>I've been reading about designing physical redundancy into networks, by
>having hot standby devices and using HSRP betwee
Asked because I don't know: how do you plan on making the switches
redundant? How are your servers, for example homed on the switches? Is it
real redundancy if closet switches are dual homed to core switches? Is your
internet connection, your firewall, etc dual homed as well?
Chuck
The wor
rcuit redundancy or multi-homing, that's a different worm-can to
open.
Is there some way to have both routers connected to the same WAN circuit?
Something along the lines of a WYE-cable that connects both routers to the
demarc connection? Or is this something that the circuit provider would
ad
I've been reading about designing physical redundancy into networks, by
having hot standby devices and using HSRP between them. As an example, if
a site has a single router and a single core switch, these are points of
risk. By adding a second core switch and a second router, any har
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:51 PM
Subject: Serial link redundancy [7:6413]
> Quick question:
>
> I have two 3640's running HSRP. Off of one 3640, hang four T1's frame
> connections that are load balanced in OSPF. We have redundancy on the
> hardware and lines, but when
Quick question:
I have two 3640's running HSRP. Off of one 3640, hang four T1's frame
connections that are load balanced in OSPF. We have redundancy on the
hardware and lines, but when the active router drops, the serial connections
will have to be physically movedany workaround
I would like to run BGP-4 at this
> > > time
> > > with multihomed load sharing and load balancing
> > > across
> > > these 3 links.
> > >
> > > These will be two steps upgrade:
> > >
> > > 1. Run BGP load sharing/balancing ac
eps upgrade:
> >
> > 1. Run BGP load sharing/balancing across two T1
> > links
> > to ISP1. Can I do this while the FT3 link is
> > still up and running with default route to ISP2.
> > Another word, can I do load sharing/balancing and
> > redundancy at this
hese will be two steps upgrade:
> >
> > 1. Run BGP load sharing/balancing across two T1
> > links
> > to ISP1. Can I do this while the FT3 link is
> > still up and running with default route to ISP2.
> > Another word, can I do load sharing/balancing and
&
t; to ISP1. Can I do this while the FT3 link is
> still up and running with default route to ISP2.
> Another word, can I do load sharing/balancing and
> redundancy at this step across these three links?
> (BGP
> via T1s to ISP1 and FT3 default route to
> ISP2)
>
> 2.
other word, can I do load sharing/balancing and
redundancy at this step across these three links? (BGP
via T1s to ISP1 and FT3 default route to
ISP2)
2. The second step is changing the fractional T3 from
default route to run BGP and do load sharing
,balancing and redundancy across these three links.
e and Fault Redundancy [7:1127]
try...
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 e1
CM
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2001 20:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Load Balance and Fault Redundancy [7:1127]
One of our customers ask
try...
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 s0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 e1
CM
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2001 20:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Load Balance and Fault Redundancy [7:1127]
One of our customers asks for load balance and fault
Hi Shawn,
Check this link out regarding load balancing and fault redundancy. Look at
the bottom of the page for more examples, not just isdn.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial
ts_c/dtsprt6/dcdbaks.htm
Thanks,
Sal
-Original Message-
From
One of our customers asks for load balance and fault redundancy. They have a
Cisco router 1605 with a serial0 for T1 (216.94.x.x), and eth0 for local
network, eth1 for DSL (66.59.x.x). This router satisfies their scenario
hardware requirements.
How to configure the Cisco router 1605 (just one
One of our customers asks for load balance and fault redundancy. They have a
Cisco router 1605 with a serial0 for T1 (216.94.x.x), and eth0 for local
network, eth1 for DSL (66.59.x.x). This router satisfies their scenario
hardware requirements.
How to configure the Cisco router 1605 (just one
R1-R2
| |
R3-R4
Hello, The Group,
I have a little problem. R1 is ISP1, R2 is ISP2.
R3 is announcing an aggregate and a subset of that aggregate.
R4 is announcing same aggregate and another subset within this aggregate
(typical multihoming)
I want to provide connectivity between R3 and R4
y, February 27, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: NIC card for redundancy
>
> HI, I'll setup and server farm with 2 6509 switches in redundancy
> configuration using HSRP, but the side of server which NIC is the
> appropriated using W2K like OS to put one port active and the other
> standb
HI, I'll setup and server farm with 2 6509 switches in redundancy
configuration using HSRP, but the side of server which NIC is the
appropriated using W2K like OS to put one port active and the other
standby...
thanks for your help
6509MSFC6509MSFC
\ /
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tony van Ree
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:45 PM
To: Jim Bond; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: redundancy
Hi,
Where is your most likely point of failure or is bandwidth the issue. WIll
etherchannel work to the 2NICs. I don't know
ECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:45 PM
To: Jim Bond; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: redundancy
Hi,
Where is your most likely point of failure or is bandwidth the issue. WIll
etherchannel work to the 2NICs. I don't know that the NT server will
understand Etherchannel.
In a study I did
The servers had two NIC's each going to a separate switch. The "backup
core switch" plugged into the main switch. There was still a single point of failure
to the users "the main core switch". Should the "main core switch" fail there would
be no network.
ECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I've got an important NT server and would like to use
> redundancy. I've got 2 6509 switches available. What's
> the common way to do? Should I put 2 NICs in the
> server and enable fast-ether channel? Or
Hello,
I've got an important NT server and would like to use
redundancy. I've got 2 6509 switches available. What's
the common way to do? Should I put 2 NICs in the
server and enable fast-ether channel? Or should I
seperate those 2 NICs on 2 6509?
Thanks in
f failover. It's the whole pix or not.
You can have up to 6 and maybe even 8 now configured on the pix in a
stateful failover with the 5.x code.
-Original Message-
From: mak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX fail
Hi all,
I configure the two PIX with failover function. Is it once there is a
link (in, out or DMZ) connected to PIX is going down, then the failover
would be activated?
Is it I can only configure one instance for each interface (in, out and
DMZ) on one PIX? If so, why PIX 520 has six slots, if
All,
We just had a second T1 installed on our 3600. Our first supplies about 20
spokes, sub-if, with various CIR's all running EIGRP with bandwidth
statements. The second was provisioned via a different cloud path for
redundancy. We want to "automatically" backup the primary
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: David Toalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: David Toalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: FW: redundancy
> >
> >
> > What does &qu
> - Original Message -
> From: wzup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: David Toalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: David Toalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:36 PM
> Subject: Re: FW: redundancy
>
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: FW: redundancy
What does "native" VLAN mean?
--- David Toalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> For question number 2 - monitoring
>
> What's Up Gold - by Ipswitch, Inc.
> http://www.ips
es. but we have definitely gotten our moneys
> worth. Email or
> call me directly if you have any questions.
>
> David Toalson
> 816-701-4142
>
> > --
> > From: Pete[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To: Pete
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 11,
Pete[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Reply To: Pete
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 7:07 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:redundancy
> >
> > This is what I have to work with. I have 2 T1,
> each going into s0 and
> > s1.
>
servers.
Brian
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, jason yee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how do I go about providing
> redundancy in a pure
> switched ethernet environment.
>
> The ethernet environment contains different switches
> mainly Catalyst
> 3500 series. I n
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
