On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 22:22 -0500, J David Eisenberg wrote:
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Simon Phipps wrote:
I've posted a Digg for the Get Legal campaign; you may wish to go
Digg it to get it up into the front page...
http://digg.com/software/_Get_Legal_-_OpenOffice.Org_Spins_Microsoft_FUD
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 19:44 -0400, Benjamin Horst wrote:
Hi all,
I'm giving a talk to the Westchester PC User's Group about OpenOffice
on Thursday, May 4 at 7:00pm local time. (Westchester is the county
just north of New York City.)
Hope it goes well. It would be great if you could let us
On Tue, May 2, 2006 10:09, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
Actually that seems to have been part of the strategy all along:
As long as they are going to steal it, we want them to steal
ours. They'll get sort of addicted, and then we'll somehow
figure out how to collect sometime in the
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 10:13 +0300, Cristian Driga wrote:
Hi John,
John McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 00:14 +1000, Mike Williams wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 06:02, John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
A bit of rephrasing/re
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 06:30 +0300, Cristian Driga wrote:
Hi,
John McCreesh wrote:
snip
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Some more suggestions for the campaign:
1. Building translated get_legal.html pages. (possibly hosted on the NLC
sites if not on why.OOo
I know we're an open-source project, but it is a bit frustrating when
work in progress is put in the public domain like this:
* people are directed to a site which is still evolving
* we reduce the impact of the press release when it's officially
released.
http://lwn.net/Articles/181996
John
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 17:02 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
John McCreesh wrote:
I know we're an open-source project, but it is a bit frustrating when
work in progress is put in the public domain like this:
* people are directed to a site which is still evolving
* we reduce the impact
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:42 +0300, Cristian Driga wrote:
Hi John,
It's a great idea and the draft looks good. More below...
John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Some suggested changes:
===1===
OpenOffice.org 2 is a world-class
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:02 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi all,
John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Please comment only on the message on this list - I'm going to look for
volunteers on the art project to turn it into a web page :-)
Good
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 09:00 +0200, Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
[snip]
We also have
to take into account that the effect of the slogan mainly comes from the
fact that it's actually a bit provocative. I think a marketing has to be
a bit provocative, but of course not too provocative. It's a
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 11:15 +0200, charles-h.schulz wrote:
Hello,
the get legal campaign is a very good idea. Maybe a small PR
operation would help it rise up in the media, who knows.
As for the risk that we may encounter due to the potential
agressive nature of the message, I think we
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 10:46 +0100, John McCreesh wrote:
[snip]
I like this - let's park it for today while we finish Get Legal. Rening
me later if I forget about it :-)
d'oh - s/Rening/Remind/
This keyboard can't spell ;-)
John
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 12:35 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi John,
John McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:02 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
One warning: when talking about this with some business-people (month or
so ago), it turned out that they could become offended. As if I
suggested
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 00:14 +1000, Mike Williams wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 06:02, John McCreesh wrote:
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Hi John,
so you don't need to type anything in again makes sense to me, but I had to
think for a few seconds. I think
Another example like Daniel's of yeaterday:
BSA offers £20k piracy bounty to rat on your boss
Three-quarters of staff say they'd drop their employer in it...
http://newsletters.silicon.cneteu.net/t/115934/463176/183536/0/
Please send any other examples to this list. I'm keen to do
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 13:46 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi John, all,
John McCreesh wrote:
[...]I'm keen to do something
under the strapline - Get legal - get OpenOffice.org
Great idea :-)
- to be used at why.openoffice.org?
I want to develop why.openoffice.org into a full mini
Comments please on http://why.openoffice.org/get_legal.html
Please comment only on the message on this list - I'm going to look for
volunteers on the art project to turn it into a web page :-)
Thanks - John
-
To unsubscribe,
On Thu, April 27, 2006 13:09, Daniel Carrera wrote:
A marketing opporunity for OOo?
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/4054/53/
Excellent Daniel - thanks for this. As I said recently in my blog:
As a proponent of open-source software, I am 100 percent and more in
favour of commercial
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:15 -0500, J David Eisenberg wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Cristian Driga wrote:
BTW: congratulations on your es.openoffice.org website. Great design.
Simple and extremely efficient. It was of inspiration for us in the
why.ooo initiative. We'd love to see the
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 18:00 -0500, Jerry Russell wrote:
STRANGE.
This is the strangest thing that has happened to me relative to computers,
and I have been working with them for thirty years.
I was loading OpenOffice on my computer and there was an explosion in the CD
drive, yes
The site plumbers have now created a holding space for the new 'shop
window' site why.openoffice.org. The 'manifesto' for this mini-site is
here:
http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=23171
I've set up an area within the Marketing section of the wiki with a few
holding
On Tue, April 18, 2006 16:33, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
MS is continuing to step up activities of BSA around the world, both in
places like Sweden and Pakistan:
http://jang.com.pk/thenews/apr2006-daily/18-04-2006/business/b11.htm
And China:
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi John, all,
John McCreesh wrote:
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
The proposal is that Why OpenOffice.org will be a major theme of our
campaigning
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 06:33 -0400, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
MS is continuing to step up activities of BSA around the world, both in
places like Sweden and Pakistan:
http://jang.com.pk/thenews/apr2006-daily/18-04-2006/business/b11.htm
What kind of ways can we ride on this and use it to
I'd like to canvass opinion among the marketing project for the launch
of a new theme: Why OpenOffice.org
The proposal is that Why OpenOffice.org will be a major theme of our
campaigning in 2006 and for OOoConf 2006. The developments in the
MS-Office 2007 story mean we have a golden opportunity
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 09:06 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Cristian Driga wrote:
Thoughts ?
I think we should pick a set of market segments where it's easier to
sell FOSS. What I got from Bruce's article was not that Linux on the
desktop is hopeless, but that Tech Writers are not the best
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 16:22 +0200, Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone tell me where I can find the press release for OOo 2.0.1?
http://marketing.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=prmsgNo=1038
John
-
To
Thanks for the tip - that's an excellent example of how people can use
their professional peer networks as a marketing opportunity. Is your focus
on getting them to use OOo in their own organisations, or on getting them
to publish articles, books, etc on OOo (and/or including CDs)?
John
On Tue,
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 01:52 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On 2006-02-27, at 22:54 , John McCreesh wrote:
Good case study at
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2006/02/23/
bristol_migration.html
\
did you add this to the wiki on the major deployments?
see http
Any interest?
John
Forwarded Message
From: Prof. Nagib Callaos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FOSSTEC 2006 Symposium
Date: 1 Mar 2006 15:57:10 -0400
On behalf of the FOSSTEC 2006 Organizing Committee, I would like to invite
you to participate, submitting a
Good case study at
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2006/02/23/bristol_migration.html
John
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 23:13 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hello to all of you,
and thanks to all the people joining the voting.
From 16 Marketing Project members only one voted for Label D, all
the others preferred Label B (four of them named Label A as second
choice).
On Wed, February 22, 2006 12:35, Alex Fisher wrote:
[snip]
May I suggest that in the future, when anyone makes any suggestion in what
may
seem to be an aggressive (for lack of a better term) tone, that everyone
take a deep breath, consider whether the poster is a native English
speaker,
if
We took part in a piece of research for Forrester on 'Social Computing':
John
Thank you for taking the time to work with us on the February 2006
Social Computing Report. As your company was mentioned in this report,
I've included a link to your complimentary copy. Please follow the
link
at
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 23:02 +, Ian Lynch wrote:
I think I put a slightly different slant on this. I entirely agree
that
the open-source communities which work best are the do-ocracies,
those
which value people according to what they contribute. By contribute,
I
don't just mean
at this
point) for the SMP. I will start working on the migration - I need the
practice with the markup. Obviously, anyone else that feels compelled to
jump in...
Jeff Causey
On Tuesday February 07 2006 17:19, John McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:07 -0800, Adam Moore wrote
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 11:07 -0800, Adam Moore wrote:
On 2/6/06, John McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We tried to define this once at
http://ooosmp.homelinux.org/GoalsandObjectives/MarketingProject
I knew there was something just didn't have the time to go find it.
Thank you. Could
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:01 +0100, Charles-H.Schulz wrote:
In any FOSS community, the community is made of the developpers. The
one
who codes is the one who calls the shots. The rest, albeit valuable
sometimes, has no other way than respecting the developpers' decisions
or try to convince
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 09:24 -0800, Adam Moore wrote:
I'll restart it in a new thread as asked here.
[snip]
This thread is exactly for the OOo MP. We as a volunteer project need
to know what our limits are as far as volunteers even more so than in
a paid job. First it tells us if we want to
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 05:35 +0200, Cristian Driga wrote:
In the same time I really want to have input from John and Jacqueline
also before we go further with big changes.
I'm more than happy to test if the wiki works as a home for the MP
John
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 21:27 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Maybe you could put something on the Marketing Project's home
page that leads people to the Marketing page on the wiki?
Will do once as soon as there's some content there ;-)
John
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 08:39 +0100, Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
SourceForge has more than 200 projects in the category Project
Management. I'll try to dive a step deeper into it.
Where could this thing be hosted? CollabNet?
As it stands, I guess no, but the wiki proved that if enough of the
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 22:16 +0100, Finn Gruwier Larsen wrote:
I mean that such a system has got to be located somewhere. Someone's
got
to install the software on a server, connect it to the internet at
keep
an eye on it now and then. And since we have no money, we can't pay
for
that
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 15:14 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
[snip]
Here's what we've got.
It says X-Server with 800 x 600 or higher resolution with 16.7 Million
colour
Please replace this line with X11 required. Available for OS X 10.3 on
Apple.com
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 21:04 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
[snip]
no... Only I'll let john take care of these points. I certainly see
the source of the confusion!
I've lost the plot here, but I think Chad was complaining about the
content of http://www.openoffice.org/product/reqts.html.
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 20:58 -0500, Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA wrote:
Just thought I would pop in with really a few questions relative to the
strategic marketing plan. Like some others on the list, I've been going
through it recently and trying to figure out where things stand with the
project.
On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 22:35 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
[snip]
I'll John take care of these points but I do think we should use
just *one* system requirements page :-) you can already see the pain
of managing multiple ones
I agree, but ...
How did you find the
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 06:55 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
John McCreesh wrote:
How did you find the http://www.openoffice.org/product/reqts.html page?
If you click the multiplatform link in the first paragraph on
the OOo home page, that is the page you go to.
I think it's left over
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 15:58 +1000, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
John McCreesh wrote:
There are some diagrams which try to illustrate this in the SMP at
http://ooosmp.homelinux.org/GoalsandObjectives/MarketingProject
John, you might like to fix the typo (missing space) in the
heading
http://www.bcs.org/BCS/Products/publishing/itnow/OnlineArchive/jan06/itnowextra/member.htm
Just skip to the last few paragraphs to read the shameless plug. The BCS
is the professional association for IT folks in the UK, many of whom are
not as au fait with open-source as they should be.
I
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 19:36 -0800, Thomas A. Shiels wrote:
What is your mailing (ie. snail mail) address?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Marketing Project is a virtual organisation - it doesn't have
physical offices anywhere :-)
John
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 23:41 -0500, DC Parris wrote:
Greetings!
I am responding to an article that claims Microsoft invests $50b/year in
RD - as if the libre software community doesn't invest in RD. I believe
it does. Can the OOo team help me quantify what gets invested in RD? I
am also
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 19:35 +, Mark Harrison (Groups) wrote:
I market OOo here in the UK. I'm not particularly high profile (I work
in a particular vertical market, and have clients who don't particularly
court publicity about their office systems). I don't claim to
represent OOo in any
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 14:53 -0800, me wrote:
[snip]
I browsed the openoffice.org site longer than I usually do with such sites,
to collect this and two other such second step site addresses within
openoffice.org:users@openoffice.org, and [EMAIL PROTECTED], to address my
immediate issue
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 00:30 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
[snip]
However, by all accounts the upcoming MSO 12 will present major problems
for anyone used to the current tools and the transition will be disruptive
and costly. [1] It is likely that a transition to MSO 12 may be more
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 01:44 +, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hi all,
Excellent article at Groklaw:
[snip]
OpenDocument beats MS XML in interoperability hands down. And this
article explains some of the technical reasons why. I highly recommend it.
Yes, I usually feel that way too about
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 17:41 +0100, Molcan Filip wrote:
Hi,
do we have any reference for company using OpenOffice.org with SAP?
Thanks a lot,
Filip Molcan
No, but SAP are one of the foundation (major) sponsors of OASIS, home of
OpenDocument
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 20:53 +0100, Molcan Filip wrote:
That's good, but is there any chance that SAP will add support for
ODF into its IS?
If you are a user, ask your account manager. If you're a member of the
SAP user group, ask at the next meeting...
There is an old joke about the man who
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 10:33 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 16:53 +0200, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
I was just told that at the day after tomorrow (Tue.), I will have to
give a 20 minute demo of what's new in OOo2 at a conference (talk
about short notice!).
The
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 10:48 +0100, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Hi guys I notice the flyer launched here:
http://www.openoffice.org/product2/more.html
We had this translated into spanish:
A4 Product Specs
http://es.openoffice.org/files/documents/73/2932/ooo2prodspeca4es.odt
A3 Product Flyer
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 10:27 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
[snip]
Actually, the full name is OASIS OpenDocument Format for Office
Applications.
You *have* to abreviate it. I think that OpenDocument is the
abreviation
that is closest to the name and is still short. OpenDoc should be
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 15:50 +1300, Ian Laurenson wrote:
[snip]
As a Marcon a business may approach me about using OOo, but would like
the level of support/stability that a large organisation can provide,
and/or the automatic conversion of Excel macros. At this point I have
become the point of
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 20:19 +1300, Ian Laurenson wrote:
To me the focus of our marketing should be on the Open Document Format
(ODF).
I believe there are two distinct products to be marketed here. We are
familiar with marketing OOo the product; one of the new features it has
in 2.0 is support
Google and Sun Microsystems will hold a press conference on Tuesday at
which they're expected to announce a collaboration to bring StarOffice
productivity applications to Google users.
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3553371
John
I'd like to pass on the thanks of the entire OpenOffice.org community to
the organisers of (in my opinion) the best-ever OOoConf. No-one was more
surprised than Urska, Robert, and Davide when Koper was selected by the
community as the venue for OOoConf 2005. It was an inspired choice, and
the team
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 15:31 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
[snip]
Do you know the schedule of the CC meeting? I don't know even the
day they meet. And we'll have to include it in the Style Manual
before they decide about it.
[snip]
It's Wednesday afternoon:
Thanks - added to http://www.openoffice.org/product2/reviews.html
John
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 21:12 +0100, Deepankar Datta wrote:
This is a good endorsement of the work on OOo
Deepankar
Begin forwarded message:
From: Deepankar Datta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 22 September 2005 20:27:11
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 20:43 -0400, Anthony Long wrote:
This is roughly $53/copy the University paid, based on the number of
students. I wonder how we can offer more value than Microsoft Office.
This price decline is not unexpected in a mature product. I would expect
to see MS-Office included
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 19:56 -0400, Don Parris wrote:
[snip]
In my book, Penguin in the Pew (a.k.a., PitP), I have a table
demonstrating that the amount of productivity lost (on average), due
to
adjusting to the differences between Msft Office and OpenOffice.org,
is
really not all that
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 21:43 +0100, Ian Lynch wrote:
I think the Marketing leads would have to authorise this given what
was
said about representing OOo. First thing to do would be to draw up a
list of willing people and then provide a common approach and set of
procedures for dealing with
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 06:51 -0700, Adam Moore wrote:
Here is the link, congrats to all the developers of 2.0
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1850999,00.asp
Well spotted - one for the web site...
Thanks - John
-
To
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:38 +0200, Erwin Tenhumberg wrote:
Hi all,
We still probably have a few weeks, but I would like to start getting
the marketing items for OpenOffice.org 2.0 ready, too.
[snip]
What OpenOffice.org 2.0 flyers and feature web pages do we have?
Have they been localized
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:16 +0200, Erwin Tenhumberg wrote:
Hi all,
For OpenOffice.org 1.1 some community members and I created a standard
presentation to be used as the basis for any kind of presentation about
OpenOffice.org. AFAIK, the presentation even got translated into other
languages
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 19:41 +0200, Charles-H.Schulz wrote:
Hello John,
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 18:27 +0100, John McCreesh wrote:
The flyers etc are on
http://marketing.openoffice.org/2.0/marketingmaterials.html
The only translations that I've seen on the issues are Sophie's
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 18:33 +0100, John McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:16 +0200, Erwin Tenhumberg wrote:
Hi all,
For OpenOffice.org 1.1 some community members and I created a standard
presentation to be used as the basis for any kind of presentation about
OpenOffice.org
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 12:40 +0200, Charles-H.Schulz wrote:
Hi,
I'd be interested in having your opinions on this MS victory.
I'm sure we can learn from our failures (although that was Sun who was
the provider here) in this case. Any idea?
Does somebody have more info on this? John? Ian?
I
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 13:57 +0200, Charles-H.Schulz wrote:
[snip]
This is where things start to get interesting. This customer is the
Scottish Police; not a candy retailer. They certainly have some very
sensitive data on their documents or somewhere on their servers and
they'd let MS Office
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 14:08 +0800, Dark Magician wrote:
Is there a repository of templates for OOo? MSO has a bunch of
templates that you can just use immediately if it applies to you. I
think this could help in promotin OOo especially to novice users.
Charles
Look under 'T' for 'Templates'
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 11:15 -0400, Chad Smith wrote:
Ian, Since OOo came out, like 5 years ago, virtually *every*
computer-related cost has dropped. I think you are giving *FAR* too
much credit to OOo. I mean, 5 years ago, I couldn't buy a 2 GHz +
machine for less than $2000, now I can get
Some interesting statistics about MS-Office:
Office 2003 appears to be falling behind in targeted sales for this
point in the product's lifecycle, according to Microsoft's own internal
figures and guidelines. Just 15% of PCs are running Office 2003, two
years into its life, with Office 12 - the
Microsoft is investing $300m in Office marketing for fiscal 2006 and
expanding the number of field sales people from 450 to more than 1,000 -
Chris Capossela corporate vice president for the information worker
product management group.
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/07/08/_office_partners/
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:54 +0200, Jacqueline Rahemipour wrote:
Hi *,
(sorry for crossposting - if you want to answer, please do this only on
one of the mailinglists)
as some of you have interest in our german marketing activities and
espacially our fairs I would like to give a short
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 10:34 -0400, Mike Gifford wrote:
Hello,
I just got an enquiry about the adoption of OpenOffice by companies for
day-to-day
operations. Is there a database with this information somewhere?
How about Novell? there's a link to their case study on
On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 00:21 +0100, Deepankar Datta wrote:
Hi
Here's an interesting post on the problems with the opendoc format
found by the gnumeric devs:
The OpenDocument Standard v1.0 completely ignores semantics of
spreadsheets, thus virtually ensuring that if two implementations of
Anyone interested / available in the UK?
Thanks - John
Forwarded Message
From: Matthew Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Free exhibition stand for OpenOffice at LugRadio Live
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:29:40 +0100
Hi John,
I'm one of the presenters
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 09:30 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently translating the A3 flyer in French.
John, it seems that you've done a new Impress template for 2.0
presentation. Where can I find it ? and is it under PDL ?
Someone posted it to one of the lists - I think it was
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 03:03 +0300, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Can anyone give me the URL for the official news release about OpenDocument
result from the OASIS voting.
I don't think OASIS have done their official announcement to the world
yet. They will probably want to tie it up with the PR
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 14:34 +0300, Miikka Leskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:10:37 -0700, Kay Schenk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Miikka Leskinen wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:28:07 -0700, Kay Schenk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Miikka Leskinen wrote:
I might as
The latest incarnation of OpenOffice was last month released for
testing by users. Early reviews say it marks a big advance over earlier
versions of the free word processing, spreadsheet and presentation package.
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/1c5e53b8-b205-11d9-8c61-0e2511c8.html
John
Gontran - this is already permitted following your post to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
John
Gontran Van Eeckhoudt wrote:
Hi
We participate in show for the innovation in wallonia-Belgium (
exhibition's name Wallinno 2005 - www.wallinno.be
http://www.wallinno.be -)
We want to
Robert Vojta wrote:
Yes, but you have to think in different way - make a long list of
needed features, open source them and let people work on features
/ things they like to work on. With proper links, status, ...
Believe me, Jacqueline has tried tried this on numerous occasions, and
in
Jason Faulkner wrote:
We (I) were set to do that yesterday, then was informed by Martin
Hollmichel that the patch needed still to go through final QA. It will
be ready tomorrow, and we'll do the full honors--announce, homepage,
etc.
Hrm.
From a marketing point of view, wouldn't it have been
Robert Vojta wrote:
Hallo all,
just an idea - WDYT about www.openoffice.org site modification in
this way:
o www.openoffice.org - project.openoffice.org
o create new, more user friendly, site, something like
light-weight propagation site
I think you know the sf.net. Try to compare
Robert Vojta wrote:
Hallo all,
I hadn't time to participate in this project during last few weeks.
I read all messages, I read archives, but found nothing about flyer
for the OpenOffice.org 2.0.
Anyone working on it? Is there a help needed? Developers are
expecting 2.0 during June and the
Small college saves big with OpenOffice.org and Linux
We've doubled the number of computers we have available to us with the
cost-savings of OpenOffice.org versus Microsoft Office. We've made
available open access to labs and cyber cafés using hardware that others
would have just thrown away.
Jacqueline McNally wrote:
[snip]
The majority of our users (~70%) use OOo on a Windows platform. If the
GNU/Linux distributions fork the development to continue to develop a
non-Java version of OOo, they will not be addressing the needs of most
of our users. Or will they?
One of the
Does anyone know if we will be able to use the 'OASIS Standard' logo
http://www.oasis-open.org/specs/index.php in our marketing material for 2.0?
Thanks - John
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
301 - 397 of 397 matches
Mail list logo
