[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 21:58:02]: > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no > longer any reason to stick to java 1.4. > > Comments? Last time I was the one who strongly

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-21 11:46:57]: On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 21:58:02]: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-17 10:35:59]: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might > > want > > to review this before I apply it. > > You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that Smartbear >

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 10:35:59]: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. You know, I wish you guys would at least try

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 21:58:02]: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no longer any reason to stick to java 1.4. Comments? Last time I was the one who

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7?idea:?off-grid darknet!

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-19 12:58:24]: > > > > > software on people's machines which we didn't write, and which for all > > > > > we know could contain well hidden code to delete their hard disks on > > > > > July 4th just for a laugh. If we install this software, WE ARE > > > > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19960 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles

* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-05-19 11:01:38]: > Author: toad > Date: 2008-05-19 11:01:38 + (Mon, 19 May 2008) > New Revision: 19960 > > Modified: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/defaultbookmarks.dat > Log: > Update Freemail edition > What about updating the

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea:?off-grid darknet!

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-19 11:47:16]: > On Sunday 18 May 2008 05:17, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Ian Clarke [2008-05-17 13:35:40]: > > > > > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Matthew Toseland > > > wrote: > > > >> Exactly, which is why Thaw, Freemail, etc are the apps that will > > > >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea:?off-grid darknet!

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-19 11:47:16]: On Sunday 18 May 2008 05:17, Florent Daignière wrote: * Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 13:35:40]: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exactly, which is why Thaw, Freemail

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19960 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-19 11:01:38]: Author: toad Date: 2008-05-19 11:01:38 + (Mon, 19 May 2008) New Revision: 19960 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/defaultbookmarks.dat Log: Update Freemail edition What about updating the

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7?idea:?off-grid darknet!

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-19 12:58:24]: software on people's machines which we didn't write, and which for all we know could contain well hidden code to delete their hard disks on July 4th just for a laugh. If we install this software, WE ARE RESPONSIBLE

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 19:00:13]: > On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include > db4o, > > and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the > > conclusion that while we can do

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-17 13:35:40]: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > >> Exactly, which is why Thaw, Freemail, etc are the apps that will > >> motivate users to use Freenet. Only developers download the JRE, most > >> users get it bundled with Java apps. The same

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 14:44:27]: > On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: > > > > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: > > > > > > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he > > > >

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-17 20:43:17]: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote: > >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland > >> wrote: > >> > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: > > > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might > > want > > to review this before I apply it. > > > > There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want > to review this before I apply it. > There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that need updating :/ See #74 > CPUID patch > From: > yongjhen

[freenet-dev] GPG auto-signing key on emu

* Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-15 14:56:56]: > (2) emu's gpg autosigning key has expired and will be renewed when I get > around to do it The new key has been generated, you can find details about the key on http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/README Ian, toad and me can revoke it if

[freenet-dev] indent verification broken (was: Verification of r19955 on emu)

* Daniel Cheng [2008-05-16 23:22:15]: > an empty indent verification message. =( > That's because of two things: 1) we used a 1.4 jvm with assertion disabled to compile and it didn't like your "assert" 2) the gpg key we use to sign messages

[freenet-dev] GPG auto-signing key on emu

* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-15 14:56:56]: (2) emu's gpg autosigning key has expired and will be renewed when I get around to do it The new key has been generated, you can find details about the key on http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/README Ian, toad and me can

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that need updating :/ See #74 CPUID patch From:

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. There is a related bug in the bug tracker

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 20:43:17]: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:44:27]: On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote: * Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: As nextgens is worried about anonymous

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 13:35:40]: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exactly, which is why Thaw, Freemail, etc are the apps that will motivate users to use Freenet. Only developers download the JRE, most users get it bundled

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 19:00:13]: On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o, and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the conclusion that while

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-16 09:35:34]: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > >> But the same argument could be used in my Java analogy. Java has a > >> far higher profile than many apps written in Java, but it doesn't > >> follow that Java should bundle all of these

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-16 09:21:10]: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Colin Davis wrote: > > I can certainly understand where you're coming from, and agree that it > > would be ideal, but I don't think that Freenet is ready to be promoted > > by application development.. Currently, when

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-16 09:21:10]: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can certainly understand where you're coming from, and agree that it would be ideal, but I don't think that Freenet is ready to be promoted by application

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-16 09:35:34]: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the same argument could be used in my Java analogy. Java has a far higher profile than many apps written in Java, but it doesn't follow that Java should

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19945 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles

* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-05-15 15:55:23]: > Author: toad > Date: 2008-05-15 15:55:23 + (Thu, 15 May 2008) > New Revision: 19945 > > Modified: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/defaultbookmarks.dat > Log: > Add The Freenet Applications Freesite, if only for

[freenet-dev] x509 certificates on emu

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-15 14:03:54]: > On Thursday 15 May 2008 13:56, you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Due to a recent debian-specific bug in openssl, I've regenerated > > the SSL certificates on emu; here are the new fingerprints: > > > > subject=

[freenet-dev] x509 certificates on emu

Hi, Due to a recent debian-specific bug in openssl, I've regenerated the SSL certificates on emu; here are the new fingerprints: subject= /C=KR/ST=Daejeon/L=Daejeon/O=freenetproject.org/OU=StartCom Free Certificate Member/CN=emu.freenetproject.org/emailAddress=hostmaster at

[freenet-dev] x509 certificates on emu

Hi, Due to a recent debian-specific bug in openssl, I've regenerated the SSL certificates on emu; here are the new fingerprints: subject= /C=KR/ST=Daejeon/L=Daejeon/O=freenetproject.org/OU=StartCom Free Certificate Member/CN=emu.freenetproject.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] SHA1

Re: [freenet-dev] x509 certificates on emu

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-15 14:03:54]: On Thursday 15 May 2008 13:56, you wrote: Hi, Due to a recent debian-specific bug in openssl, I've regenerated the SSL certificates on emu; here are the new fingerprints: subject=

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19945 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-15 15:55:23]: Author: toad Date: 2008-05-15 15:55:23 + (Thu, 15 May 2008) New Revision: 19945 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/defaultbookmarks.dat Log: Add The Freenet Applications Freesite, if only for

[freenet-dev] Post-0.7.0 priorities

* Jano [2008-05-14 12:55:49]: > Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > * Jano [2008-05-14 > > 11:21:05]: > > > >> > Personally I'm pretty skeptical of anything requiring more than 100MB. > >> > >> However, current implementation (IINM) uses the cache to resume downloads. > >> Thus, downloading

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19914 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers

* Daniel Cheng [2008-05-14 19:31:37]: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > * Daniel Cheng [2008-05-14 11:34:19]: > > > On 5/14/08, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > > * j16sdiz at freenetproject.org > >

[freenet-dev] Post-0.7.0 priorities

* Jano [2008-05-14 11:21:05]: > > Personally I'm pretty skeptical of anything requiring more than 100MB. > > However, current implementation (IINM) uses the cache to resume downloads. > Thus, downloading anything bigger than that in more than one go has the > potential of a lot of waste in

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19914 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers

* Daniel Cheng [2008-05-14 11:34:19]: > On 5/14/08, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * j16sdiz at freenetproject.org [2008-05-13 > > 16:11:59]: > > > > > Author: j16sdiz > > > Date: 2008-05-13 16:11:59 + (Tue, 13 May 2008) > > > New Revision: 19914 > > > > > >

[freenet-dev] Website not the big problem atm? was Re: Content Management System

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-13 13:45:18]: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion > > rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet. > > Firstly, I don't buy that stat, and

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19914 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers

* j16sdiz at freenetproject.org [2008-05-13 16:11:59]: > Author: j16sdiz > Date: 2008-05-13 16:11:59 + (Tue, 13 May 2008) > New Revision: 19914 > > Added: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers/RijndaelTest.java > Log: > JUnit for Rijndael > > > Added:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19914 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-14 11:34:19]: On 5/14/08, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 16:11:59]: Author: j16sdiz Date: 2008-05-13 16:11:59 + (Tue, 13 May 2008) New Revision: 19914 Added: trunk

Re: [freenet-dev] Post-0.7.0 priorities

* Jano [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-14 11:21:05]: Personally I'm pretty skeptical of anything requiring more than 100MB. However, current implementation (IINM) uses the cache to resume downloads. Thus, downloading anything bigger than that in more than one go has the potential of a lot of

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19914 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-14 19:31:37]: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-14 11:34:19]: On 5/14/08, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [freenet-dev] Post-0.7.0 priorities

* Jano [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-14 12:55:49]: Florent Daignière wrote: * Jano [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-14 11:21:05]: Personally I'm pretty skeptical of anything requiring more than 100MB. However, current implementation (IINM) uses the cache to resume downloads. Thus

[freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-12 23:04:59]: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Florent Daigni?re > wrote: > > I personnaly won't work on it for now. The main point against our > > current website is that it's not community-friendly... Let's see if the > > community feels involved and will contribute

[freenet-dev] WoT plugin

* Julien Cornuwel [2008-05-12 19:14:06]: > Hi, > > I'm having interrogations about the use of the WoT plugin and I'm > confronted to a choice : > > The plugin is able to handle multiple local identites. But do you think > it could be usefull to allow local identities to set different trust >

[freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 17:41:55]: > Florent Daigni?re schrieb: > > * Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 05:04:07]: > It's probably not possible to migrate in two days but it seems that now > is a good point to start the process, as Ian mentioned he wanted to > change the website significantly

Re: [freenet-dev] Website not the big problem atm? was Re: Content Management System

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 19:50:38]: On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion rate - that is, 40% of

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19914 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 16:11:59]: Author: j16sdiz Date: 2008-05-13 16:11:59 + (Tue, 13 May 2008) New Revision: 19914 Added: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers/RijndaelTest.java Log: JUnit for Rijndael Added:

Re: [freenet-dev] Website not the big problem atm? was Re: Content Management System

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 13:45:18]: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet. Firstly, I don't

[freenet-dev] Subversion 1.5

* Ian Clarke [2008-05-11 18:08:23]: > Merging in Subversion is a major PITA, but fortunately this is about > to change with version 1.5, see this blog entry for details: > > http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=92 > > Hopefully this will make it easier for us to use more pervasive use of >

Re: [freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 17:41:55]: Florent Daignière schrieb: * Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 05:04:07]: It's probably not possible to migrate in two days but it seems that now is a good point to start the process, as Ian mentioned he wanted to change

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin

* Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 19:14:06]: Hi, I'm having interrogations about the use of the WoT plugin and I'm confronted to a choice : The plugin is able to handle multiple local identites. But do you think it could be usefull to allow local identities to set different

Re: [freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-12 23:04:59]: On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I personnaly won't work on it for now. The main point against our current website is that it's not community-friendly... Let's see if the community feels

[freenet-dev] Chinese translation for dont-close-me / welcome

* Daniel Cheng [2008-05-11 22:51:31]: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: > > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Florent Daigni?re > > wrote: > >> * Daniel Cheng [2008-05-11

[freenet-dev] Chinese translation for dont-close-me / welcome

* Daniel Cheng [2008-05-11 17:03:06]: > Hi, > Here are the Chinese translation for cont-close-me and welcome.html > > Regards, > Daniel Cheng Commited in r19890. You might also want to translate pack-descriptions in the installer (see

Re: [freenet-dev] Chinese translation for dont-close-me / welcome

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-11 17:03:06]: Hi, Here are the Chinese translation for cont-close-me and welcome.html Regards, Daniel Cheng Commited in r19890. You might also want to translate pack-descriptions in the installer (see

Re: [freenet-dev] Chinese translation for dont-close-me / welcome

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-11 22:51:31]: On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-11 17:32:44]: On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5

Re: [freenet-dev] Subversion 1.5

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-11 18:08:23]: Merging in Subversion is a major PITA, but fortunately this is about to change with version 1.5, see this blog entry for details: http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=92 Hopefully this will make it easier for us to use more pervasive

[freenet-dev] What to do with the 0.5 related stuffs?

* Ringo Kamens <2600denver at gmail.com> [2008-05-08 23:35:20]: > I think we should keep .5 stuff around, since a lot of things link to > it We can provide permanent redirects to new content, that's not a problem. > but there's no reason to advertise it. Also, I get the feeling that > lots of

[freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 22:47:28]: > Ian Clarke schrieb: > > You could argue that all of those things have it easy, because most > > people understand what those things do, they don't need an elaborate > > explanation. But look at Gnome's website: > > > > http://www.gnome.org/ > > > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19836 - in trunk/website: . includes pages/de

* Michael T?nzer [2008-05-09 09:32:01]: > Florent Daigni?re schrieb: > > * Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 23:35:21]: > > > >> Some of your changes broke the link to the English news site on the > >> German one. The old link doesn't work either. > >> We need that link because the news section needs

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19836 - in trunk/website: . includes pages/de

* Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 23:35:21]: > Some of your changes broke the link to the English news site on the > German one. The old link doesn't work either. > We need that link because the news section needs to be up to date and I > can't always translate it in real time. Okay, what's the

[freenet-dev] What to do with the 0.5 related stuffs?

Hi, I'm currently in the process of cleaning up our server... And I'm planning to get rid of all the .5-related stuffs now that 0.7 is officially released. That includes our builds and seednode files hosted on downloads.freenetproject.org, a *lot* of apache

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19836 - in trunk/website: . includes pages/de

* Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-09 09:32:01]: Florent Daignière schrieb: * Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 23:35:21]: Some of your changes broke the link to the English news site on the German one. The old link doesn't work either. We need that link because

Re: [freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 22:47:28]: Ian Clarke schrieb: You could argue that all of those things have it easy, because most people understand what those things do, they don't need an elaborate explanation. But look at Gnome's website: http://www.gnome.org/

Re: [freenet-dev] What to do with the 0.5 related stuffs?

* Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 23:35:20]: I think we should keep .5 stuff around, since a lot of things link to it We can provide permanent redirects to new content, that's not a problem. but there's no reason to advertise it. Also, I get the feeling that lots of freenet users

[freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 17:41:55]: > Florent Daigni?re schrieb: > > * Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 05:04:07]: > > > >> In the last few weeks I've done some work on the website. While > >> translating it, there were some things that struck me so I changed them. > >> But our site is still far

[freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael T?nzer [2008-05-08 05:04:07]: > In the last few weeks I've done some work on the website. While > translating it, there were some things that struck me so I changed them. > But our site is still far from perfect. It lacks a attractive design and > some features that would be quite

Re: [freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 05:04:07]: In the last few weeks I've done some work on the website. While translating it, there were some things that struck me so I changed them. But our site is still far from perfect. It lacks a attractive design and some features that would

Re: [freenet-dev] Content Management System

* Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 17:41:55]: Florent Daignière schrieb: * Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 05:04:07]: In the last few weeks I've done some work on the website. While translating it, there were some things that struck me so I changed them

[freenet-dev] What to do with the 0.5 related stuffs?

Hi, I'm currently in the process of cleaning up our server... And I'm planning to get rid of all the .5-related stuffs now that 0.7 is officially released. That includes our builds and seednode files hosted on downloads.freenetproject.org, a *lot* of apache

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19836 - in trunk/website: . includes pages/de

* Michael Tänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-08 23:35:21]: Some of your changes broke the link to the English news site on the German one. The old link doesn't work either. We need that link because the news section needs to be up to date and I can't always translate it in real time. Okay,

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19793 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res

* Daniel Cheng [2008-05-06 22:46:17]: > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:31 PM, wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-05-06 14:31:49 + (Tue, 06 May 2008) > > New Revision: 19793 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/apps/new_installer/res/wrapper.conf > > Log: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19778 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows

* Florent Daigni?re [2008-05-06 05:40:45]: > * toad at freenetproject.org [2008-05-06 > 00:28:10]: > > > Author: toad > > Date: 2008-05-06 00:28:09 + (Tue, 06 May 2008) > > New Revision: 19778 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/browse.cmd > > Log: > > doh > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19778 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows

* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-05-06 00:28:10]: > Author: toad > Date: 2008-05-06 00:28:09 + (Tue, 06 May 2008) > New Revision: 19778 > > Modified: >trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/browse.cmd > Log: > doh > > Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/browse.cmd >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19793 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-06 22:46:17]: On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-05-06 14:31:49 + (Tue, 06 May 2008) New Revision: 19793 Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/wrapper.conf Log:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19778 - trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-06 00:28:10]: Author: toad Date: 2008-05-06 00:28:09 + (Tue, 06 May 2008) New Revision: 19778 Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/browse.cmd Log: doh Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/windows/browse.cmd

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19694 -?trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-05 18:54:57]: On Sunday 04 May 2008 02:44, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-03 19:44:25]: On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-05-03 11:48:01 +

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19675 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: crypt node store support

* Daniel Cheng [2008-05-04 22:51:06]: > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: > > > > > > > int sleeptime = aggressiveGCModificator; > > > if(sleeptime <= 0) { // We are done > > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19693 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-03 19:43:37]: > On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:45, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-05-03 11:45:09 + (Sat, 03 May 2008) > > New Revision: 19693 > > > > Modified: > > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19694 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io

* Matthew Toseland [2008-05-03 19:44:25]: > On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:48, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote: > > Author: nextgens > > Date: 2008-05-03 11:48:01 + (Sat, 03 May 2008) > > New Revision: 19694 > > > > Modified: > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19675 - in trunk/freenet/src/freenet: crypt node store support

* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-04 22:51:06]: On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: int sleeptime = aggressiveGCModificator; if(sleeptime = 0) { // We are done ps.queueTimedJob(this,

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19694 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-03 19:44:25]: On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-05-03 11:48:01 + (Sat, 03 May 2008) New Revision: 19694 Modified:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19693 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-03 19:43:37]: On Saturday 03 May 2008 12:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: nextgens Date: 2008-05-03 11:45:09 + (Sat, 03 May 2008) New Revision: 19693 Modified:

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19671 - trunk/website

* NEOatNHNG at freenetproject.org [2008-05-01 23:57:31]: > Author: NEOatNHNG > Date: 2008-05-01 23:57:31 + (Thu, 01 May 2008) > New Revision: 19671 > > Modified: >trunk/website/style.css > Log: > Another little adjustment > The website looks broken from here now... The text is broken

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19643 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . res/unix/bin

* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-05-01 13:47:49]: > Author: toad > Date: 2008-05-01 13:47:49 + (Thu, 01 May 2008) > New Revision: 19643 > > Added: >trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/install_autostart.sh > Modified: >trunk/apps/new_installer/ProcessPanel.Spec.xml >

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19643 - in trunk/apps/new_installer: . res/unix/bin

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-01 13:47:49]: Author: toad Date: 2008-05-01 13:47:49 + (Thu, 01 May 2008) New Revision: 19643 Added: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/install_autostart.sh Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/ProcessPanel.Spec.xml

[freenet-dev] Stun plugin

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-28 21:54:34]: > On Monday 28 April 2008 03:02, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-04-26 00:01:36]: > > > > > ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a > functioning > > > site. > > > > > > > Done in r19577 > > Is this a

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-28 17:08:15]: > On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * toad at freenetproject.org [2008-04-28 > > 14:28:50]: > > > > > Author: toad > > > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008) > > > New Revision: 19582 > > > > > > Modified: > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-04-28 14:28:50]: > Author: toad > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008) > New Revision: 19582 > > Modified: >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java > Log: > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps. > Huh ?

[freenet-dev] Stun plugin

* Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-04-26 00:01:36]: > ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a > functioning > site. > Done in r19577 -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-28 14:28:50]: Author: toad Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19582 Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java Log: Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps. Huh ?

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19582 - trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-28 17:08:15]: On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daignière wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-28 14:28:50]: Author: toad Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 + (Mon, 28 Apr 2008) New Revision: 19582 Modified

Re: [freenet-dev] Stun plugin

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-28 21:54:34]: On Monday 28 April 2008 03:02, Florent Daignière wrote: * Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-26 00:01:36]: ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a functioning site. Done in r19577

Re: [freenet-dev] Stun plugin

* Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-26 00:01:36]: ...please remove stun.fwd.org from JSTUN.java. Does'nt look like a functioning site. Done in r19577 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Devl mailing list

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19547 - tags

* Matthew Toseland [2008-04-25 13:44:37]: > On Friday 25 April 2008 11:03, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * toad at freenetproject.org [2008-04-24 > > 18:00:12]: > > > > > Author: toad > > > Date: 2008-04-24 18:00:12 + (Thu, 24 Apr 2008) > > > New Revision: 19547 > > > > > > Added: > > >

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19547 - tags

* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-04-24 18:00:12]: > Author: toad > Date: 2008-04-24 18:00:12 + (Thu, 24 Apr 2008) > New Revision: 19547 > > Added: >tags/freenet-0.7.0-rc2/ > Log: > Tag 0.7.0-rc2 > > > > Copied: tags/freenet-0.7.0-rc2 (from rev 19539, trunk) Heh! Why did you tag

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >