Re: [R300] drm driver: merge upstream, security, etc

2005-06-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 21:25 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: On 6/26/05, Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you saying this: if ((offset=dev_priv-fb_location) (offsetdev_priv-gart_vm_start)) return 0; is more readable than: if ((offset = dev_priv-fb_location

DRM mappings cleanup

2005-06-26 Thread Eric Anholt
it was with and without old-dma, and also with ForcePCIDMA. The diff is about +190, -390 lines. Anyone want to review it first, since I have a tendency to under-test on linux? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [R300] securing r300 drm

2005-06-21 Thread Eric Anholt
address space, like you do for color/depth offsets, right? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy

Re: [R300] securing r300 drm

2005-06-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 16:56 -0400, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 14:57 -0400, Vladimir Dergachev wrote: /* Texture offset is dangerous and needs more checking */ ADD_RANGE(R300_TX_OFFSET_0, 16); I don't

Re: DRM and permanent SAREA

2005-06-21 Thread Eric Anholt
concerned by the handwaving involved in how apps are going to interact with mode setting (yes, I do want to be able to have my video game switch to 1280x1024), but I have nothing concrete to offer either. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org

Re: DRM and permanent SAREA

2005-06-21 Thread Eric Anholt
for review first? I've got a patch to clean up map handling that I'm working on, and I'd like to avoid more mess. I'm not clear on why you need a new map type, if it's going to be treated like DRM_SHM everywhere. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: CVS Update: drm (branch: trunk)

2005-06-18 Thread Eric Anholt
files: drm/linux-core/: Makefile.kernel drm/shared-core/: radeon_cp.c radeon_drv.h Removed files: drm/linux-core/: radeon_i2c.c radeon_i2c.h Thank you! -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] suspend/resume and mesa

2005-06-17 Thread Eric Anholt
wrong, which OOM killing this hypothetical small daemon certainly should qualify as. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email

Re: Merging radeon DRM and fbdev on Linux

2005-06-10 Thread Eric Anholt
find interesting. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you shotput

Re: [R300 and other radeons] MergedFB lockups

2005-02-19 Thread Eric Anholt
launches of GL apps. I see this on my R200 on amd64, as well. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide

Re: [patch] texturing performance local/gart on rv250

2005-02-10 Thread Eric Anholt
with it, check and see if the app caused a copy on write, if so free the page, else just remove the COW flag. Is there evidence that this is/would be in fact faster? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: sis-20050205-linux snapshot - problems

2005-02-07 Thread Eric Anholt
is the reason for DRI not supported? This is SiS 315-series hardware, which we have no 3d information on. I've certainly looked and tried to get it. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: FIXED: MergedFB and pageflipping

2005-01-05 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 17:04 +0100, Roland Scheidegger wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: It's a little tricky - I guess you'll need some way of informing the kernel which way it is supposed to calculate crtc1_base, either by a new call to the SET_PARAMETER ioctl, or via the ABI version setting

Re: R300 code in Xorg

2004-12-12 Thread Eric Anholt
is slower than software indirect GLX, if I remember right. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide

Mesa CVS is back

2004-11-21 Thread Eric Anholt
Mesa CVS is back in place thanks to Keith. Now someone needs to review dri/drm for changes. /me returns to homework -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank goodness for the 22nd

CVS down

2004-11-15 Thread Eric Anholt
Just a heads up -- it appears that fd.o was compromised as of about two days ago. Daniel has taken it down while he and a few others check out the extent of the damage and verify that nothing nastier than assisting in the distribution of spam happened. Sorry for the troubles. :( -- Eric Anholt

__FUNCTION__ vs __func__

2004-11-06 Thread Eric Anholt
One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__ has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine for gcc 2.95. Any opposition? -- Eric Anholt

Re: __FUNCTION__ vs __func__

2004-11-06 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 16:27, Randy.Dunlap wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: One of our developers who is working with a non-gcc compiler has asked if we could convert __FUNCTION__ usage in the drm to __func__. __func__ has the benefits of being shorter, being c99, and still being just fine

Re: DRM formatting issues.

2004-11-01 Thread Eric Anholt
. This is CVS, you don't rename, sorry. The names aren't that bad, though. I've made some progress on converting BSD, but when I got to the linux code added to the shared radeon driver code, I lost motivation. Hopefully I'll get back to it soon, but it's pretty frustrating to work on. -- Eric

Re: Multiple hardware locks

2004-10-31 Thread Eric Anholt
? That would let you sleep waiting for them (rather than spinning, a win in itself) and you wouldn't have to hold the hardware lock. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: flushing write-combine?

2004-10-15 Thread Eric Anholt
the register before the commit of the ring write pointer, supposedly due to some PCI write posting interaction that caused hangs. Might be related to this issue, might not, or it might have been some other issue and that extra read isn't necessary any more. Just throwing this out there. -- Eric

New R200 projtex patch

2004-10-12 Thread Eric Anholt
as thoroughly tested as previous ones. YMMV. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide

Re: New R200 projtex patch

2004-10-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 15:18, Roland Scheidegger wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: This one is nowhere near as thoroughly tested as previous ones. YMMV. Certain textures in ut2k3/ut2k4 are still broken (all ground textures in dm-antalus). Water reflection in the same map is also broken

Re: R200 Projective texturing and texgen

2004-10-11 Thread Eric Anholt
in r200-projtex-6.diff);-))) Those two exit errors (which also happen in quake3) are due to my broken hack to disable vtxformat. My next step with this is to figure out what exactly to do to vtxformat to make things happy again (and hopefully swtcl projtex, too). -- Eric Anholt

Re: R200 Projective texturing and texgen

2004-10-10 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 10:13, Andreas Stenglein wrote: Am 2004.10.10 11:14:11 +0200 schrieb(en) Eric Anholt: http://pdx.freedesktop.org/~anholt/dri/r200-projtex-6.diff #4 had broken nontcl quite significantly. I'm thinking I just stomped some of my changes with another editor window

Re: R200 Projective texturing and texgen

2004-10-10 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 13:50, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Sonntag, 10. Oktober 2004 21:56 schrieb Eric Anholt: On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 10:13, Andreas Stenglein wrote: Am 2004.10.10 11:14:11 +0200 schrieb(en) Eric Anholt: http://pdx.freedesktop.org/~anholt/dri/r200-projtex-6.diff #4 had

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
other things, trying to initialize it with r100 or r200 microcode will probably make it explode in your face. Now, if this was part of an attempt at getting http://r300.sf.net/ stuff working on FreeBSD, that'd be another thing :) -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
;-) It's working for myself and Roland. What build system are you using? I only added the USE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB=1 define in Mesa linux-dri (and therefore linux-dri-x86) target. If you're using something else, you'll have to add the define to whatever CFLAGS there. -- Eric Anholt

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 13:40, Marcello Maggioni wrote: On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:23:03 -0700, Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 08:41, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:37 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 15:14, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:17, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new Radeon-9800 out there too

Re: Segfault on RTCW with Savage

2004-10-06 Thread Eric Anholt
-with-fog? You won't end up doing the install_attrs again like you want. For Rage 128, I just stored the index in the context and checked if that had changed, instead of the vertex format register's value. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: R200 ReadPixels optimization

2004-10-06 Thread Eric Anholt
and maybe getting code that's about as good for their particular machine (if they get lucky). -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net

Re: Segfault on RTCW with Savage

2004-10-06 Thread Eric Anholt
field. I should get some sleep before I trying to fix any more bugs. Ouch. Indeed. I wonder how expensive tnl_install_attrs is -- might we want to just always do it? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL

Re: [Mesa3d-cvs] CVS Update: Mesa (branch: trunk)

2004-10-03 Thread Eric Anholt
. I would really like this. BTW, r128_vb.h is now an empty file. Couldn't it be removed? Yeah, it was left over from applying patch and forgetting to cvs rm. Done now. Thanks! -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt

Re: CVS Update: drm (branch: trunk)

2004-09-30 Thread Eric Anholt
debug functions? I would be inclined to see them go away. Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide

Re: What to do about shared files and drm-core?

2004-09-30 Thread Eric Anholt
in the kernel that we've been saying was necessary anyway and avoid unconditionally requiring AGP. I would prefer to see the changes for the core live in shared/ like always and have the current directories disappear, but it's not a big deal. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!

2004-09-29 Thread Eric Anholt
be good to see this disappear. Though the drivers don't rely on it, I don't know if the server-side code persists in setting it up regardless, which might make it hard to get rid of. SiS relies on context ctor/dtor (dtor only, when I'm done) for its kernel memory manager. -- Eric Anholt

Re: R200 - save_on_next_unlock

2004-09-26 Thread Eric Anholt
this isn't helping in my tests, but I've got a patch locally to fix it that'll go in. Reordering state emits seems to slowly but surely be fixing neverball's intro screen issues. Of those intro screen issues, all but the eye seemed to be related to the backup emit, and all seem tcl-related. -- Eric

SiS DRM memory management cleanup

2004-09-25 Thread Eric Anholt
it before, and don't remember at this point, so I'm hoping someone could give it a once-over before I commit. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Re: UT2003/4 nearly all textures are broken

2004-09-25 Thread Eric Anholt
we have any systematic way to figure this stuff out? R100 seems OK with neverball. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: r200_cmdbuf.c

Re: Software fallback fixes and R300 driver work

2004-09-23 Thread Eric Anholt
be legal, note that r200Flush is called from FIREVERTICES, so that emit state that's happening is probably necessary. I had noted this with r200Clear, which depends on state being (semi-?) current at the time of the clear ioctl, and FIREVERTICES and the racefixes should guarantee that. -- Eric Anholt

R100 state-backup

2004-09-23 Thread Eric Anholt
Same thing as for r200, but for r100. Effects are even better, according to ipers. Anyone want to do some testing before I commit? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: radeon_compat.c

Re: Improve state emitting for ipers

2004-09-22 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 22:42, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 10:41, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Montag, 20. September 2004 23:14 schrieb Eric Anholt: On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 12:58, Dieter Nützel wrote: But got progs/demos IperS V1.0 Written by David Bucciarelli ([EMAIL

Re: DRM radeon i2c support and GPL

2004-09-22 Thread Eric Anholt
/shared) remains portable to other platforms without depending on the GPLed bits, which I don't think is on the horizon at all. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: exception testing in r200 driver

2004-09-22 Thread Eric Anholt
supports it. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod

Re: Improve state emitting for ipers

2004-09-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 15:00, Roland Scheidegger wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: The attached patch removes the mandatory emits of all state which were happening after each cmdbuf flush. Instead, we set a flag after a cmdbuf flush saying save the state at the next unlock, which means memcpying

Re: Improve state emitting for ipers

2004-09-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 10:41, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Montag, 20. September 2004 23:14 schrieb Eric Anholt: On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 12:58, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Montag, 20. September 2004 21:52 schrieb Dieter Nützel: Am Sonntag, 19. September 2004 11:21 schrieb Eric Anholt

Re: New S3TC version needed ;-)

2004-09-13 Thread Eric Anholt
) NOT S3TC related ;-) About a third of that loss (5% overall), I'd say, is due to my fixes for the r200 and r100 races. I've got an idea for how to avoid those costs while also avoiding those races, but I won't be getting to it for a little while, at least. -- Eric Anholt

Re: radeon-pre-2

2004-09-11 Thread Eric Anholt
a little more convenient for some developers, at the expense of all the users who don't want all of those drivers necessarily. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: New proposed DRM interface design

2004-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
(Linux) users. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer

Re: New proposed DRM interface design

2004-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
a number from them. I've certainly heard from over a hundred, and of course that's a tiny fraction of the total number. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Proper way of implementing context switches....

2004-08-24 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 22:58, Thomas Hellström wrote: Hi! Mike Mestnik wrote: --- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 15:24, Ian Romanick wrote: Thomas Hellström wrote: As some of you might have read on another thread

Re: Proper way of implementing context switches....

2004-08-23 Thread Eric Anholt
offset in the 3d driver, they'd have to update the 2d driver to reset it when grabbing the lock, bump the DDX version, and check for that version in the 3d driver and deal with it appropriately. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org

Re: No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-13 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 01:45, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:40:19AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: You'll need to use the DDX (i810_drv.o -- the 2d driver) from X.Org CVS to get the i915 support. Note that the next X.Org release should be out in two weeks. Hmm

Re: [Xorg] Code freeze extension

2004-08-13 Thread Eric Anholt
. That is, unless a release were to happen from the head branch the next couple of days. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-12 Thread Eric Anholt
X.Org release should be out in two weeks. You might get lucky by using mine: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/i810_drv.o -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 03:57, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:40:19AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: You'll need to use the DDX (i810_drv.o -- the 2d driver) from X.Org CVS to get the i915 support. Note that the next X.Org release should be out in two weeks. You might

Re: No DRM kernel support for i830 ?

2004-08-11 Thread Eric Anholt
option. The alternate route is to just port the i810 driver as-is. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: [Xorg] Re: Any patches for X.Org release?

2004-08-11 Thread Eric Anholt
. (also note that dri developers can do this :) -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price

ssh access is back

2004-08-09 Thread Eric Anholt
Sorry for not telling you when ssh went down/why. My impression was that it would be back quickly, and I forget that I'm basically the link between the real admins and dri/mesa. Anyway, it should be back now. Sorry for the pain. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: DRM code reorganization

2004-08-03 Thread Eric Anholt
replaced it and made it smaller in terms of code and binary size, 64-bit clean, and (I think) much more readable. I'm going to take a look at committing it once I can drag myself away from X.Org, at which point someone with via hardware could do the same for theirs. -- Eric Anholt

Re: drm - first steps towards 64-bit correctness..

2004-07-31 Thread Eric Anholt
will be replacing longs with fixed-size types that are the same on x86, but I haven't looked at Egbert's diffs yet, unfortunately. As long as you don't use the linux-y u32-type types, BSD should be happy with the changes. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: trying compile savage dri on X.org cvs (was: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree).

2004-07-25 Thread Eric Anholt
-jDRI-XFree86-4_3_99_12-merge -jDRI, resolve conflicts, place the new code under a BuildDevelDRIDrivers ifdef (see the via driver), and test. This is what it will take to merge the savage driver. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org

Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.

2004-07-23 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 01:56, Sérgio M. Basto wrote: On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 05:04, Eric Anholt wrote: I still need to merge the development drivers (mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad floppy and I do want to test these merges on the appropriate hardware. yes , I had

X.Org DRI merge

2004-07-22 Thread Eric Anholt
be pretty nice to have. The advantage of the tinderbox route is that we get a pretty nifty way to look at the logs when the build fails, and better knowledge of just when the build began failing, should development become active enough that nailing breakages down within the day is useful. -- Eric

Re: X.Org DRI merge

2004-07-22 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 00:47, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 03:21, Eric Anholt wrote: OK, so current DRI sources have been merged. Sorry for the CVS logs not being clear on the mailing list, but what happened was that after I noticed that the Mesa log was huge I went

Re: X.Org DRI merge and what about new dri tree.

2004-07-22 Thread Eric Anholt
(mach64, savage), but my testbox is down due to a bad floppy and I do want to test these merges on the appropriate hardware. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

New X.Org committers: DRI developers

2004-07-21 Thread Eric Anholt
I've added the DRI developers that weren't in x.org's list already to the xorg group so that they'll be able to commit after the next merge happens. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-19 Thread Eric Anholt
ensure that we continue covering compiling of both paths in trunk by using the tinderbox. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-16 Thread Eric Anholt
due to IBM policy, though. Any updates on that? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic

Re: [Xorg] Introduce DRI_VERSION?

2004-06-20 Thread Eric Anholt
that?) that .90 numbering is hideous. whats wrong with -preX ? Yeah, here's a vote for that, as well. And for tarring a snapshot at this point, if we could. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Unichrome-devel] Re: Via DDX for DRI?

2004-06-14 Thread Eric Anholt
one. That solution sounds worse than the problem -- break all new DDX vs old libGL for the sake of one (questionable, IMO) DDX's requirement that could be handled easier with a symlink. The thing to do, if this feature were really desired, would be to extend the XF86DRI protocol. -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Xorg] DRI merging

2004-06-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 08:40, Alex Deucher wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 16:44:43 +0200, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 23:17 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: I would like to see a merge from DRI CVS to X.Org in the near future. Is there any opposition

Re: [Xorg] DRI merging

2004-06-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 07:44, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 23:17 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: I would like to see a merge from DRI CVS to X.Org in the near future. Is there any opposition to this? No opposition, but a concern: Where are we going to integrate the DRI

Re: [Xorg] DRI merging

2004-06-12 Thread Eric Anholt
is pbuffer support in the mesa hw drivers and some support for multi-head mode setting. In the xserver on OpenGL model XAA disappears. --- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working on the Render acceleration -- there were some conformance issues in the ATI patch that I'm working

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Mesa endian check..

2004-06-07 Thread Eric Anholt
someone fix this include.. Dave. Go for it. FreeBSD doesn't even have any big-endian platforms supported yet. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: What's the story with drmGetBufInfo?

2004-06-01 Thread Eric Anholt
to remove all traces of it (from both user mode and kernel mode). Is there any reason not to? If we need that functionality later, we can design a better interface for it that will less fragile. Here's my vote for the axe. I've never seen drmstat.c used. -- Eric Anholt

i830 t_vertex.c nitpick

2004-05-24 Thread Eric Anholt
do the _tnl_install_attrs because v0 is the same as it was before, even though the tnl code would have changed to emit the specular instead of the pad. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] Memory management of AGP and VRAM

2004-05-19 Thread Eric Anholt
of an interface without changing anything. This was part of working to allow removal of old DRM code/features, which I've been completey distracted from. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Xorg] Re: Damage/Composite + direct rendering clients

2004-05-17 Thread Eric Anholt
pretty well in Xati (and gives you as many XV ports as you want), though it lacks the controls typically associated with YUV conversion using the overlay scaler, like brightness/saturation. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt

Re: Getting a DRM right from the start

2004-05-17 Thread Eric Anholt
, so setting things to int32s should be fine. I know SiS is an exception, which I'll fix soon. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: From Eric Anholt:

2004-05-12 Thread Eric Anholt
userland and kernel, and nothing else. They are included by both userland (libdrm, statically linked in the 3d drivers and in the X server) and kernel. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa AND dri cvs not working

2004-01-31 Thread Eric Anholt
directory for `/cvs/mesa/Mesa' (/cvs/mesa/Mesa/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs update: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/cvs/mesa/Mesa' cvs [update aborted]: read lock failed - giving up Should be fixed now. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Dri-devel] new nightly snapshots

2004-01-30 Thread Eric Anholt
and won't be doing much any DRI work. Feel free to commit the changes in there, and make any other changes necessary -- I hoped for this copy of the snapshots scripts to be shared enough that any DRI folks could fix problems. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED

[Dri-devel] new nightly snapshots

2004-01-29 Thread Eric Anholt
. The cronjob is run from my account, but if you need to turn that off or otherwise modify it while I'm gone, an admin like keithp or DanielS should be able to do it. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa AND dri cvs not working

2004-01-28 Thread Eric Anholt
. We're working on fixing it. cvsup and developers' cvs access should work in the meantime. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net

Re: [Dri-devel] MesaCVS: chmod 755 Mesa/bin/mklib*, please

2004-01-14 Thread Eric Anholt
the permissions of the RCS file directly in the repository. Meta data like permissions is (unfortunately) not under version control in CVS. Fixed by chmod a+x /cvs/mesa/Mesa/bin/mklib*. It may not take effect until the files are checked out again, though (just a cvs up didn't do it for me). -- Eric

Re: [Dri-devel] [PATCH] Savage4 DRI support

2004-01-09 Thread Eric Anholt
, but it was decided later that the server didn't need to be responsible for that and the client driver would do it. So, it's generally been commented out or disabled. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] 2.4.23: user/kernel pointer bugs (drivers/char/vt.c, drivers/char/drm/gamma_dma.c)

2004-01-08 Thread Eric Anholt
wrapping the OS's malloc/free. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast

[Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: HEADSUP: Mesa move to freedesktop.org

2003-12-28 Thread Eric Anholt
thinking of just moving the DRM out to a separate module in the DRI's CVSROOT. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email

[Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: HEADSUP: Mesa move to freedesktop.org

2003-12-28 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 21:06, Jon Smirl wrote: --- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: don't think Mesa makes any more sense as a home than DRI, since both are consumers (and the freedesktop.org X Server is now a consumer, too). If There aren't three consumers: Mesa, xserver and DRI

Re: [Dri-devel] Building from CVS

2003-12-12 Thread Eric Anholt
. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills

[Dri-devel] tests of post-newmesa dri

2003-12-10 Thread Eric Anholt
that r128 diff on my TODO, sorry for not trying it yet. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials

[Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Anholt
in Imake.tmpl that is used in the drivers build. It's overridden for non-FreeBSD in host.def. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:57PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:21, Alan Hourihane wrote: CVSROOT: /cvs/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/config/cf/ Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 16:34, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:14:09PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:57PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:21, Alan Hourihane wrote: CVSROOT

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] DRI newmesa merge

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Anholt
of the latest tree. Might also be an opportunity to make Mesa-newtree Mesa again :-) -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net

Re: [Dri-devel] Wiki notification emails

2003-11-29 Thread Eric Anholt
features). -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you

Re: libexpat foo, was: Re: [Dri-devel] ATI radeon 9200 DRI

2003-11-25 Thread Eric Anholt
26% / /dev/cciss/c0d0p8 146897 12940133958 9% /home /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 19329 155 16% /boot -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] Hard lockup switching between xservers on different VTs

2003-11-05 Thread Eric Anholt
there are issues. This makes me wonder how difficult it would be to get two servers to cooperatively share a DRM instance (both of them holding the DRM open, rather than the reinit thing done before). -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >