On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Jason Bodnar wrote:
> On 03-Dec-99 Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> > I think mod_perl is sufficiently hard that even as more people learn how
> > to do the simple stuff, mod_perl will still be 'difficult' enough. I don't
> > think it is like J
I think whenever you get advocacy posts then you see a flurry of posts.
If you don't like those types of posts, you usually pretty quickly
identify them by topic (currently it is the mod_perl programmers are in
demand subject line).. and can filter out...Delete delete delete...
I may be wrong, bu
wrote:
> Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> > Again, it's hard enough finding a good perl programmer, but finding
> > someone who can compile everything together and understand it all is a top
> > 15 percentile ( and I think I am being generous) skill which I don't thin
Before taking the drastic step of grabbing a hold of the IPC::ShareLite
namespace (I prefer this to a branch split), how long have you been trying
to contact him?
Where I live, I know a few people that took off big time during the
Millenium holiday. I don't think it is unusual that someone might
John M Vinopal wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2000 at 06:18:32PM -0600, Ken Williams wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John M Vinopal) wrote:
> > >On Sat, Jan 15, 2000 at 06:23:57AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > >> in httpd.conf:
> > >> PerlTaintCheck On
> > >>
> > >> my $page = CGI::param('goto');
It may be worth mentioning that a recent expose' on bad CGI scripts by Rain Forest
Puppy in Prack issue #55 revealed that some system calls take backslashes and use
them to escape dots, so its useful to get into the habit of also checking for
optionally backslashed periods in a row instead of jus
I am trying to understand the purpose of this?
This is not considered to be a replacement for embedded perl solutions
right? It is just a better HTML parser using a visitor design pattern? and
a faster parser than HTML::Parser?
Those are cool motivations, but it takes me a little while going thr
The problem with requests such as these is ... well... why isn't this stuff
going into the main mod_perl guide? It seems to me that if www.modperl.com is
focused around the book, then let it be. But I personally hate going through
different sites to find the info I want.
Another question is why w
You aren't necessarily the only point of view. At some points (especially
with mod_perl), Apache tracks become interesting to attend. However, more
often my particular job entails me being a programming whore, and so I am
equally interested in Java, Perl, and Microsoft COM/DCOM/ASP technologies
*e
Jeff, I think you are right about this when the conferences not only vary
east coast/west coast, but vary locations on the east and west coast.
However, the conferences that I've attended that have gone through one cycle
of this are usually pretty good. eg SANS always seem to alternate East/West
w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gunthar,
>
> Previous to reading your post I thought I was the least qualified to
> comment on the conference . . .
>
:) I do think everyone is qualified on this list to say what they would like
out of a conference that involves mod_perl.
>
> Personally, a tightly f
I tend to prefer using a library or module to handle CGI logic like this
and then drop out to the main script if the logon has been successful. The
important thing is to make sure that the workflow is separated into a
separate module. In mod_perl, you may have the option of having a mod_perl
handl
Soulhuntre wrote:
> Hiya :)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Leslie Mikesell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 1:34 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: mod_perl weaknesses? help me build a case
> >
> > Your problem h
Writing Apache::Registry and then moving to PerlEx will have greater performance
than writing Apache::ASP and moving to PerlScript Pages on IIS. However, the
performance difference is probably not that great compared to using CGI on both
platforms.
Later,
Gunther
Soulhuntre wrote:
> Hiya :)
>
Soulhuntre wrote:
> Hiya :)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gunther Birznieks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 6:56 AM
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Win32/Linux cross dev... closing in :) Last comments?
Yeah...
http://perl.apache.org/guide/strategy.html#One_Plain_Apache_and_One_mod_per
Soulhuntre wrote:
> Hiya :)
>
> OK... mod_perl embeds an instance of Perl inside the Apache system, and with
> Apache::ASP allows us to mix perl/html. Good :)
>
> The problem is that these processes are 'heavy'.
Vivek,
Is it possible that a special auth handler could be written that stores the number
of bad authorizations for a userid and the last time of the hit in a DBM file for
quick lookup? Then, configure an environment or server variable if the auth screwed
up more than 3 times within the last hour
It may be a "stupid" benchmark. But no one seems to have commented on the CPU
rates. Why was PerlEx 100% and PerlScript 45% on the same machine, same
ActiveState Perl (presumable), same CPU config. And yet took the same amount of
time to complete.
I find that interesting. I suspect that it is a t
on for the
requirements).
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Mark Imbriaco wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> > Vivek,
> >
> > Is it possible that a special auth handler could be written that stores the number
> > of bad authorizations for a userid and th
"Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, B&T wrote:
>
> > I've generally created a cgi script per page. Is that a mistake?
> > (I embed the perl in my html so I can edit pages with an html editor)
> >
> > I need a better technique for invoking traversals to other pages.
> > Right now all
Mark Imbriaco wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> > I guess it depends on what this guy wants to do. The primary point of my
> > message was to ask if it is possible to do what I stated as a workaround
> > to the stateless HTTP problem that Vivek
Also, some legitimate people turn off cookies. In addition, weird browsers
(especially PDAs with limited memory) tend not to implement cookies. So those
are considerations for locking out users that may be legitimate.
However, I would rather think that the cookies would be an advisory security
me
Yeah, this was officially announced at iserver 3-4 weeks ago. It's been in beta
testing for months.
I would say that the only weird thing about it is that they only give you one
server config so a lot of the lightweight front-end, heavyweight-perl back-end
stuff in the guide is a bit useless for
On the main topic at hand: I am under the impression vcpan and other
iserver tools like it are proprietary and it is how they manage their
virtual UNIX boxes so that you can have almost root-like access to your
virtual web server machine without being a true separate physical box
that you have roo
While I understand that it might be an "advantage" to allow the customer's
their own mix of modules, it can also be a bit of a support headache as
different customers will be loading different DSOs presumably even in
different orders. There may be subtle bugs with module interaction that
provi
> if that doesn't work for you look at FastCGI, and if that doesn't work for
> > you join the effort to get mod_perl working on Apache 2.0 with a
> > multi-threaded model. Or just skip the preliminaries and go straight for
> > the hack value...
>
>Well... the second option certainly has a lot of merit. Maybe I
>should get involved in that... actually that has a lot of appeal to
>me. Hmm... I guess it's time to pick apache 2.0 stuff and do some
>tinkering! :) As far as the present problem... I'm not all that
>concerned about it. It actually falls outside of the area of my
>responsibilities at our site..., I'm thinking for the other people in
>the community mostly.
>
>Thanks!
>Shane
> >
> > - Perrin
> >
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
It tends to be longer to write Java than Perl, but it's
much cleaner as all memory is shared and thread-pooling libraries do exist
to restrict 1-thread (or few threads) per CPU (or the request is blocked)
type of situation.
However, I would stress that speed/threading is not the only name in the
game. Reliability is another concern. Frankly, I have seen a lot of buggy
servlets crash the entire servlet engine making a web site useless.
Generally if there is a core dump in an Apache/Mod_perl process, the worst
is that one request got hosed.
I am resigned to the fact that all languages are buggy, and so I like
engineering architectures that support buggy languages (as well as buggy
app code).
Later,
Gunther
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
cessing, when the script is much heavier the overhead of using
>C can be insignificant.
>
>______
>Stas Bekman | JAm_pH--Just Another mod_perl Hacker
>http://stason.org/ | mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://perl.orghttp://stason.org/TULARC/
>http://singlesheaven.com| http://perlmonth.com http://sourcegarden.org
>--
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
a and I hate writing
middleware servers in Perl. But that is my only architectural bias.
Later,
Gunther
At 11:51 PM 4/16/00 -0500, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
>According to Gunther Birznieks:
>
> > If you want the ultimate in clean models, you may want to consider coding
> > in J
I am not going to answer your question directly because I don't know the
answer.
However, consider that not many people use jpl. Therefore, it is likely
that it has more bugs than other parts of Perl. Also consider that the
software you use may end up disliking the process model and rely on
i
While I agree that a true garbage collector would be cool. I wonder what
the utility would really be when you would primarily want it in mod_perl
type stuff. Yet, mod_perl is also great because of speed. One of the nice
things about Perl right now is that it is fast and that is partially due to
s... Memory usage.
>
>Your apache processes would be the size of a stock
>apache process, like 4-6M or so, and you would have 1 process that
>would be 25MB or so that would have all your registry in it.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
these persistent
server memory issues more clear (perhaps even for a growing Java server).
http://forum.swarthmore.edu/epigone/modperl/zarwhegerd
Later,
Gunther
At 11:19 AM 4/19/00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 01:24:16PM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> >
91 80 3431470
>email : diffs+AEA-vsnl.com
>http://www.diffs-india.com
>
>Differentiated Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,
>176, Gr. Floor, 6th Main
>2nd Block RT Nagar
>Bangalore - 560 032
>India
>Ph: 91 80 3431470
>email : diffs+AEA-vsnl.com
>http://www.diffs-india.com
__
p changing something
somewhere that causes a chain reaction for the other toolkit.
In addition, when you use tools to troubleshoot an App and check out the
state of other modules that are loaded (like Perl-Status), it is likely to
be cleaner if you are just running your custom app instead of many apps
together when you are trying to trace something down.
Anyway, that's just my two cents. Could be wrong on this... But I didn't
see it emphasized before and I think it is a point that will become more
relevant as application suites for Mod_perl will start getting released on
top of the purely infrastructural components that exist now.
Later,
Gunther
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
would be
different from ActiveState's default build?
Admittedly I have never bothered compiling Perl on Win32 as I only use it
to play with (not serious production for the obvious limitations of
mod_perl on Win32). So I have not seen the reference to this readme you are
referring to.
_
works on EVERY
>client !!!
>
>(its of course possible to let the user sign out .. logout.. that should
>destroy
>the session as well !!)
>
>with kind regard
>
>Manfred Dehnkamp
>
>
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
any person who has access to the same browser will still have to login
> >>to get to the inner pages.
> >>
> >>If the browser is killed without sign-out from the system, even then
>there's
> >>no problem.
> >>Next person who gets access to the bro
At 01:44 PM 4/20/00 -0500, Matt Carothers wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
>
> > 5) The secure token is associated on the server side (preferably on
> > another tier, such as a database) with the user identification token.
> > Additionally, to support secure session timeouts, t
#x27;t know of a real way around this. However, I did spend some time
investigating these issues today and will post some of my results to
previous messages.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
The need to display fatal errors generically to a browser is not the same
as constructive exception checking that programmers would do when looking
for particular error conditions.
Later,
Gunther
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
t a runtime
error. This particular division by zero is a compile time error-- actually
the same as your scenario 2. Perl is curiously smart enough to know that
> my $x = 1 / 0;
Is a division by zero literal error. I suppose Perl tries to take 1 / 0 as
literals and interpret them at
This is similar to how sessions in Java Servlets work. Cookies used by
defaults, but routines exist to help mangle the URLs for those that do not
wish to use them.
Later,
Gunther
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
At 02:51 PM 4/23/00 +0200, Gerald Richter wrote:
> >
> > So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until
> > everything is rewritten to be thread-safe?
> >
>
>No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So
>the Perl modules itself need not to be thread saf
Why do you need to settle on one or the other?
Anyway, the only reason you need Domino IMHO is because you have linked in
with other Lotus notes applications. However, if this is a public site not
an intranet, I would strongly urge them not to use this short cut for
putting apps out there. Lot
At 09:59 AM 4/23/00 -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Gerald Richter wrote:
>
> > >
> > > So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until
> > > everything is rewritten to be thread-safe?
> > >
> >
> > No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache
lkit for loading Extropia::View files written in
Perl since I wanted compile-time errors to be caught inside of the user
interface files since I thought it would be likely that graphic designers
would cause syntax errors fairly readily.
Later,
Gunther
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
new CGI(); print $q->header();'
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
I assume Apache's request object send_http_header does whatever Apache does
to get the header printed out with the charset stuff when the static pages
are displayed?
Later,
Gunther
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Extropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
At 10:46 PM 3/15/2002, John Saylor wrote:
>Hi
>
>( 02.03.15 10:03 - ) Jonathan M. Hollin:
> > However, I request your comments on this idea: should we have just one
> > button (helping to develop a distinct identity for mod_perl) or should
> > we have several (for choice)? It's up to you...
At 04:14 PM 6/7/2002, Tony Bowden wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:08:56PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> > > Suppose you have a model object for a concert which includes a date. On
> > > one page, the designers want to dipslay the date in a verbose way with
> > > the month spelled out, but on anot
e entire ISO-9000 quality assurance team to a
>|
>| Bat-Leth contest on the holodeck. They will not concern us again.
>|
>| http://public.logica.com/~stepneys/joke/klingon.htm
>|
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
Office: (65) 64791172 Mobile: (65) 96218290
At 12:58 PM 6/14/2002, Dave Rolsky wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Rob Nagler wrote:
>
>
>I'm not a big fan of O/R. I prefer R/O. But to each their own.
Would one of you mind providing a 1 paragraph definition of each? I am
afraid that I am starting to get lost in the semantic differences of
con
to fill his large shoes.
>>
>>If you're a good Perl programmer who has a strong sense of "the way it
>>should be" and can be simultaneously mean, nasty, angry, distrustful and
>>unforgiving to Perl code and the opposite to people then we'd like to
>>t
ively maintained now? should i re-send now to the docs-dev
>mailing list?
>
>thanks and, again, Great Work!
>
>-dave
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Open Web Technology Company
http://www.eXtropia.com/
Office: (65) 64791172 Mobile: (65) 96218290
At 09:24 PM 7/13/2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>>I agree! It is great work. It looks really slick.
>
>:)
>
>>Unfortunately, the mod_perl guide documentation area has lost
>>functionality. I wanted to download the "latest" guide before
ogether - at minimum, I need to be able to create and destroy
>sessions, and to have the user id shared between the two. Preferably,
>using files (and not mysql).
>
>Thanks,
>Yair Lenga
>
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote:
>Any other thoughts?
>
>
Yeah, this is off topic, please label it as such. :)
>
>
You would think if they want an anal scripting language they would move to
python not PHP. :)
John Saylor wrote:
Hi
( 02.10.30 03:22 -0500 ) Perrin Harkins:
They didn't make their decision on performance though. They seem to
have been most influenced by the idea that perl allow
Does it have to be mod_perl in order to help your case?
I gave a talk on Perl being used for webapps for investment banking at
the 1999 Perl Conference and Morgan Stanley allowed a champion of Perl
deliver a keynote at the OReilly Open Source Conference in the year
2000. But neither of us talke
** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
> // \\| // ** Personal Web Site: http://sergeant.org/ **
> \\//
> //\\
> // \\
______
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
atest version of mod_backhand).
>
>--
>
>
> /||** Director and CTO **
>//||** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving **
> // ||** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
> // \\| // ** Personal Web Site: http://sergeant.org/ **
>
for the tips.
>
>Greg
>
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > /||** Director and CTO **
> >//||** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving **
> > // ||** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
> > // \\| // ** Personal Web Site: http://sergeant.org/ **
> > \\//
> > //\\
> > // \\
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
At 12:21 PM 10/29/00 +, David Hodgkinson wrote:
>Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am also concerned that the original question brings up the notion of
> > failover. mod_backhand is not a failover solution. Backhand does have some
> > faci
At 01:31 AM 10/30/2000 +, Greg Cope wrote:
>[...snip...]
> >
> > And don't forget about the use of DirectoryIndex:
> > GET /index.html http/1.0
> >
> > HTTP/1.1 302 Found <<== here's your redirect
> >
> > Now this gets through:
> > GET / http/1.0
>
>Hum ...
>
>Nice one - I had not tried this
by the front-end
server.
>I use a mod_proxy front-end myself and it works very well.
>
>- Perrin
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an
> addressing
>or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the
> author by
>replying to this email. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
>use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or reply on this email.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
At 10:43 AM 10/31/2000 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>At 04:13 PM 10/31/00 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> >As a bonus, if you write your app smart with cache directive
> >headers, some of the dynamic content can truly be cached by the front-end
> >server.
>
>Gunther,
&
per release; much is unfinished or in need
>of rework, altho i am using the engine as is for several
>projects today. i'm interested in feedback on both the
>general goals of the software as well as on its architecture
>and implementation. there's no mailing list, so pleas
At 10:09 AM 11/2/00 -0500, Bakki Kudva wrote:
>I have two slightly offtopic questions.
>
>1. I noticed that SAP - "On October 5, 2000, at Linux World SAP DB was
>announced to be made available as Open Source software using the GNU
>General Public License for the database kernel and the GNU Lesser
done in the kernel, freeing the user process from the waiting job, and
>making frontend servers unnecessary. There's even an interface for it,
>namely SO_LINGER, and Apache knows how to use it. But SO_LINGER is
>badly specified, and known to be broken in most tcp/ip stacks, so
>curre
At 01:01 PM 10/30/2000 -0600, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
>According to Gunther Birznieks:
>
> > I guess part of the question is what is meant by "balanced" with regard to
> > the non-apache back-end servers that was mentioned?
>
>I'd be very happy with e
the requests
>and passing them around? Will we see a significant performance improvement
>in any event?
>
>NIge
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
At 03:32 PM 11/5/00 +, G.W. Haywood wrote:
[..snipped to avoid Ask's wrath...]
>Your outburst (with which I have to agree, although maybe we might
>talk about banner ads later:) prompted me to publish a document that
>Stas and I have been working on, if sporadically, for quite a while.
>It'
At 03:41 PM 10/27/00 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On 27 Oct 2000, (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
>
> > > "Tim" == Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Tim> You could have a set of apache servers that are 'pure' DBI proxy
> > Tim> servers. That is, they POST requests containing SQL (for
ime it takes for the parent to wipe out all the old
> > children). I'd be happy to share the script, provided my boss doesn't
> > mind. :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christian
>
>--
>BLH
>www.RentZone.org
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
already.
>
>--
>Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
>Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
>See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite an
tory lookup.
>
>If you are building a new system with this scheme, try ReiserFS on
>a Linux box. It does not suffer from the usual problems when
>you put a large number of files in one directory and is extremely
>fast at lookups.
>
> Les Mikesell
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
ayer between the system and the user?
> >
> > I am fairly ignorant of the way Win32 does its threading etc so I ask.
> >
> > Thanks for any input
> >
> > John Armstrong
> >
> >
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
chief, The Highway Star http://www.deep-purple.com
> Apache, mod_perl, MySQL, Sybase hired gun for, well, hire
> -----
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
>Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
>http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://jazzvalley.com
>http://singlesheaven.com http://perlmonth.com perl.org apache
At 01:58 PM 11/14/00 +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
>At 11:22 14/11/2000 +0100, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >Just as with TPC our aim is to have a full double room track for mod_perl
> >for all 3 days. So make sure that you submit enough mod_perl material, so
> >we will have it full.
>
>I have some experienc
At 04:50 AM 11/14/00 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Stas" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Stas> P.S. For ApacheCon you just submit your proposals from one of the above
>Stas> links, no need to send proposals here for them to get accepted. Of
>course
>Stas> you are welcome
Uh, I was just seeing if anyone actually read my emails. :)
Actually, I am quite happy this was added. Thanks!
At 09:02 AM 11/16/00 -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gunther Birznieks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, Novembe
teresting, should anyone have tuits to spare on testing this out :)
>
>-- robin b.
>Don't panic.
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
I think these are good points.
However, to some degree, if this is an attempt to allow an ISP protection,
it's not because most ISPs offer CGI access to their customers.
In addition, the moment you give mod_perl access to a developer they have
the rights to do a LOT of stuff that goes beyond p
At 08:43 PM 11/15/00 +0300, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>On 15 Nov 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote:
>
>DH> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DH>
>DH> > Ralf is always talking about SSL stuff, so if you want to do it, why
>don't
>DH> > you just contact him and sync with him. It's not mod_perl but man
At 11:15 AM 11/17/00 +, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
> > Going along ths lines of sharing mod_perl between users for ISPs
> > is there a median position that tempers security concerns/support
> > costs/hassles etc that a CPAN module could f
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
---
hey seem to be pretty speedy;
>what do I have to gain by doing it the "right" way?
>
>Thanks..
>
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
At 03:04 PM 11/19/2000 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Didier" == Didier Godefroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Didier> on 11/19/00 4:55 PM, Ime Smits at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered the following:
> >> | How do we make sure regular CGI scripts are using mod_perl???
> >> | Is there a way t
At 10:42 PM 11/19/2000 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>[snip]
>
>Apache::Registry - use it only for backend or lowtraffic sites. It does
>not cache anything, so when you do databases, and files, can be bad to
>horrible to use. Using with small MySQL databases (50,000< records) you
>can get medioc
especially if CGI's are suexec'ed.
So I would advocate an ExecModPerl option or something like that so that
user's could not arbitrarily install their own Perl Handlers.
At 12:20 PM 11/19/2000 +, Richard Goerwitz wrote:
>Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> > The CGI scripts on yo
At 08:42 AM 11/20/00 -0500, Richard L. Goerwitz wrote:
>Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> > >At the risk of repeating myself, I'm looking for a way of setting up mod_
> > >perl so that, if I turn off ExecCGI for a given directory (and maybe spe-
> > >cify a list o
;print end_html;
>-
>
>yacek
>
>
>-----
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d so much government
backing that a lot of IT professionals are into Java but not into Perl.
Anyway, I just wanted to take a poll to find out if I am wrong and if there
are some good solid pockets of Perl people in SE Asia.
Later,
Gunther
__________
Gunth
k up your apache tree before you start tinkering.
>
>Best.
>--
>Joe Schaefer
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
>several times within a short interval it would be fairly likely that it
>would be worth staying connected. You'd trade some slower hits
>off against not accumulating a huge number of little-used database
>connections.
>
> Les Mikesell
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/
/TJMATHER/Apache-PageKit-0.05/lib/Apache/PageKit/Error.pm
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Gunther
At 10:44 AM 12/1/00 +1300, Eustace, Glen wrote:
> > You see, IE is smarter than the web site authors of the world. It
> > insists that the document URL end in an approprate extension to do the
> > right thing. A typical workaround is to just append "/foo.pdf" to
> > your URL and let your Apache:
At 05:17 PM 11/30/00 +0100, Renzo Toma wrote:
>Apache::Session uses a cookie to identify a user. Every request will be
This is an accurate reply to the message but...
I think you want to be careful with terminoloy. Apache::Session does not
use a BROWSER level cookie. I think you are using the
101 - 200 of 409 matches
Mail list logo
