I just upgraded a server from 5.1 to 5.5. Our tables are all MyISAM. I
have a python script that inserts rows to a table, in 5.1 it worked
fine. In 5.5 it's failing with 'Lock wait timeout exceeded'. I google
this, and it seems that all the cases of people getting that were with
Inn
fi.ah...@sifycorp.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 2:04 PM
> To: 'Suresh Kuna'
> Cc: 'mysql@lists.mysql.com'; 'shafi...@gmail.com'
> Subject: RE: [Warning] Aborted connection.. (Got timeout reading
> communication packets)
>
> Hi suresh: I have g
t Rgs,
Shafi AHMED
Sify - Chennai
-Original Message-
From: Shafi AHMED [mailto:shafi.ah...@sifycorp.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 2:04 PM
To: 'Suresh Kuna'
Cc: 'mysql@lists.mysql.com'; 'shafi...@gmail.com'
Subject: RE: [Warning] Aborted co
t Rgs,
Shafi AHMED
Sify - Chennai
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Kuna [mailto:sureshkumar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 1:29 PM
To: Shafi AHMED
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com; shafi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Warning] Aborted connection.. (Got timeout reading
communic
therefore the user sessions terminate causing
> business impact...Can some one who is expertise already in this advice at
> the earliest?
>
>
> 120513 8:19:45 [Warning] Aborted connection 1167257 to db: 'iib' user:
> 'iibuser' host: '210.18.3.94' (Go
: '210.18.3.94' (Got timeout reading communication packets)
OS version: RHEL 5.3
DB version: MYSQL 5.1
Table involved in the DB is of type : inndoDB
Background : This is an online exam registration site DB and the concurrent
connex invariably reaches to 200 for 500 users which should
I'm getting a Lock wait timeout exceeded error and I'm not sure why. I've
been trying to read this SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS output, but I don't
understand what it's trying to tell me.
Can someone give me a hand here?
---TRANSACTION 1942A27B, ACTIVE 124 sec, proc
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Jesper Wisborg Krogh
wrote:
> E.g. setting slave_net_timeout to 180 seconds, then an event that takes 240
> seconds to transfer will never make it through. The replication will make
> it
> 75% through and then start all over.
>
Without bothering to read or test, I
Hi,
According to the manual, the slave-net-timeout specifies how long time to wait
for data from the master before considering the connection dead. From my
experience this actually means that the slave will reconnect if it hasn't
received a full event in that period of time.
E.g. se
Hi
Can anyone confirm if there are any connection time out values I can specify
in my application (ASP (VBScript) for the MySQL ODBC connection.
Cheers
Neil
Hello Manasi,
Manasi Save wrote:
Hi All,
Can anyone provide me any input on in what all senerios one can get this
error. I have innodb tables, I am updating one table but I am getting
error lock wait timeout try restarting transaction. Also the parameter
innodb_lock_wait_timeout is set to 50
Increase your Innodb_buffer_pool_size. It will solve your problem.
Thanks,
Krishna
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Manasi Save <
manasi.s...@artificialmachines.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a query which gives an error of lock wait timeout only this
> transaction is
29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Manasi Save <
> manasi.s...@artificialmachines.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a query which gives an error of lock wait timeout only this
>> transaction is running with 2 records in the table.
>>
>> The query is :
>&g
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Manasi Save <
manasi.s...@artificialmachines.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a query which gives an error of lock wait timeout only this
> transaction is running with 2 records in the table.
>
> The query is :
>
> Update T
Hi All,
I have a query which gives an error of lock wait timeout only this
transaction is running with 2 records in the table.
The query is :
Update Test
Set TestFlag = 1
Where TestID = 5;
Can this one transaction lock my entire table?
--
Thanks and Regards,
Manasi Save
Artificial
Hi All,
Can anyone provide me any input on in what all senerios one can get this
error. I have innodb tables, I am updating one table but I am getting
error lock wait timeout try restarting transaction. Also the parameter
innodb_lock_wait_timeout is set to 50 default. what will be the effect of
,
`Interest` VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`Profile` VARCHAR(256) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
`Phrases` LONGTEXT NOT NULL,
`LunarAnimal` SMALLINT(6) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`Horoscope` SMALLINT(6) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
`BloodType` SMALLINT(6) NOT NULL DEFAU
.
> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:51:55 -0600
> Subject: Re: timeout
> From: jlyons4...@gmail.com
> To: mzamils...@gmail.com
> CC: mysql@lists.mysql.com
>
> First, be sure you can access the host - try pinging it.
>
> Second, if you can ping the computer so you know the
d these potential problems and you still can't connect
contact the sys admin of the remote computer.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Mosaed zamil wrote:
> hello all,
> When I send : mysql -h address -u root -p from a distant computer I don't
> get connected. I think it is
If you do not connect probably you have a firewall in between,
and it is not a timeout problem.
You should ask your network administrators to open, if possible, that port
for you.
Another option is to ssh to the host and do a local connection to the MySQL
instance.
Cheers
Claudio Nanni
2009/1
hello all,
When I send : mysql -h address -u root -p from a distant computer I don't
get connected. I think it is a timeout problem.
How can I increase the timeout period.
TIA
mosaed
major pain but if I can't fix it I can't expect my
> client to constantly be restarting the OO base.
>
> All I have found on the web is to increase the interactive timeout but
> it is at 28,800 now. So that isn't it.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> I am using:
> OO v3 on windows
> jdbc v5.1.7
> mysqld v5.0.45
>
> -bazooka
>
reconnect.
Not only is this a major pain but if I can't fix it I can't expect my
client to constantly be restarting the OO base.
All I have found on the web is to increase the interactive timeout but
it is at 28,800 now. So that isn't it.
Any ideas?
I am using:
OO v3 on windows
jdb
For example,the user is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to adjust timeout value for him ,which is different from the global
parameter named interactive_timeout or wait_timeout?
--
I'm a MySQL DBA in china.
More about me just visit here:
http://yueliangdao0608.cublog.cn
he reset master script is lunched.
This works only on half my servers and i noticed that on the servers where
it didn'twork mysql take up to 30 seconds to start and be ready for
connection. So i'm wondering could this be related to some kind of mysql
timeout like "connect_timeout
I am using mysql client 5.0.27. When the Mysql server is stopped (signal
19) the client calls do not timeout.
I am setting the timeout values using MysqlPP setoptions method, to set
the op_read_timeout value.
I've looked through the bug database and found that this problem was
rep
Hi,
I have 1 SP that does INSERT and UPDATE query to 1-2 tables. It runs ok
for sometime, but i sometime got this error message:
"ERROR 1205 (HY000): Lock wait timeout exceeded; try restarting transaction"
The message would ussually dissapear and the SP runs well for sometime unti
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:42:40PM +0100, Mechain Marc wrote:
> I have a Mysql Server (4.1.8) where some sessions stay connected for a
> value greater than "Interactive timeout" value.
>
> Here is an abstract of the "show processlist" command:
>
> | 129
I have a Mysql Server (4.1.8) where some sessions stay connected for a
value greater than "Interactive timeout" value.
Here is an abstract of the "show processlist" command:
| 129996 | fret | mtt04.back:33598 | fret | Sleep | 61756 |
| 129998 | fret | mtt04
aksono [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:36 PM
> To: Robert DiFalco
> Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: Re: Lock wait timeout exceeded during concurrent inserts on an
> InnoDB table
>
> Roberts
>
> How many concurreent inserts you'
t: Re: Lock wait timeout exceeded during concurrent inserts on an
InnoDB table
Roberts
How many concurreent inserts you've done?
What MySQL version you use?
> Concurrent inserts (there also may be concurrent reads going on) are
> intermittently causing:
>
> java.sql.S
Roberts
How many concurreent inserts you've done?
What MySQL version you use?
> Concurrent inserts (there also may be concurrent reads going on) are
> intermittently causing:
>
> java.sql.SQLException: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try
> restarting transaction
>
PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 11:20 PM
Subject: RE: Lock wait timeout exceeded during concurrent inserts on an
InnoDB table
Ok, I will do that during my next test run. But in the meantime, when I
did it previously, it was oddly enough waiti
: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Lock wait timeout exceeded during concurrent inserts on an
InnoDB table
Robert,
please post SHOW INNODB STATUS\G during such lock wait, so that we see
what lock it is waiting for.
Best regards,
Heikki
Oracle Corp./Innobase Oy
InnoDB - transactions, row
up MyISAM
tables
http://www.innodb.com/order.php
- Original Message -
From: ""Robert DiFalco"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:00 PM
Subject: Lock wait timeout exceeded during concurrent i
Concurrent inserts (there also may be concurrent reads going on) are
intermittently causing:
java.sql.SQLException: Lock wait timeout exceeded; try
restarting transaction
I noticed that adding innodb_table_locks=0 in my.ini fixes the problem.
Looking through the manual however, this
Hi all,
I'd like to clarify on this odd issue. It seems to me that MySQL will
automatically drop database handles, assumably if the handle has not
been used for some time. Is this true? If so, how can I disable timeout?
This is an unexpected behavior, because I have tried MSSQL and Po
Find out if decreasing of different %timeout% variables affects
the length of the delay before dieing of Slave_IO thread.
Irek S³onina wrote:
> Hello.
> I have mysql-4.1.14 and 4.1.15 on PLD's.
>
> When the Slave_IO_State is in 'Connecting to Master' state
>
Hello.
I have mysql-4.1.14 and 4.1.15 on PLD's.
When the Slave_IO_State is in 'Connecting to Master' state
because of the unreachable master host (timeouting)
the 'slave stop' or 'slave stop io_thread' tooks
minimum 2 minutes.
fe.:
mysql> stop slave io_thread;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (2 min 52
AIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: crashes in InnoDB with MySQL 4.1.14 (semaphore wait timeout)
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Deva,
it is probably this insert operation that is stuck, and is holding an
S-latch of an index tree in emai
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Deva,
it is probably this insert operation that is stuck, and is holding an
S-latch of an index tree in emails_history_30_30:
---TRANSACTION 0 1856588555, ACTIVE 858 sec, process no 1792, OS thread
id 2445845440 inserting, thread declared inside InnoDB 318
mysql tables in
ent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 1:33 AM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: Re: Lock wait timeout exceeded
>
> Hello.
>
>
>
>
>>Any ideas where to go with this? How can I find out which session is
>
>
>>holding the lock and what lock it is?
- Original Message -
From: "Devananda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: crashes in InnoDB with MySQL 4.1.14 (semaphore wait timeout)
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Deva,
please post those transactions which have
abase.myodbc
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: crashes in InnoDB with MySQL 4.1.14 (semaphore wait timeout)
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Deva,
please post the complete output except the transaction data.
Regards,
Heikki
Please let me know if there is any
c
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: crashes in InnoDB with MySQL 4.1.14 (semaphore wait timeout)
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Deva,
please post the complete output except the transaction data.
Regards,
Heikki
Please let me know if there is any additional data I can provide to h
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Deva,
please post the complete output except the transaction data.
Regards,
Heikki
Please let me know if there is any additional data I can provide to help
resolve this.
=
051005 7:18:17 INNODB MONITOR OUTPUT
==
.1.14 (semaphore wait timeout)
Devananda wrote:
One of our servers which is configured primarily for InnoDB has crashed
in the same fashion three times in the past 48 hours. I've been going
over the error log, and I would like to know if anyone else has seen
similar errors, or can give me some
t: Re: Lock wait timeout exceeded
Hello.
>Any ideas where to go with this? How can I find out which session is
>holding the lock and what lock it is?
SHOW INNODB STATUS and, probably, SHOW PROCESSLIST can give you
some additional information about what's going on. Use:
sho
Devananda wrote:
One of our servers which is configured primarily for InnoDB has crashed
in the same fashion three times in the past 48 hours. I've been going
over the error log, and I would like to know if anyone else has seen
similar errors, or can give me some pointers to work out this probl
"Jonathan Stockley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/03/2005
08:55:17 PM:
> Hi,
>
> We're having a problem with "lock wait timeout exceeded" errors. We are
> exclusively using innodb tables apart from the mysql database. The
> problem seems
#x27;;
to find out the transaction isolation level. See:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/InnoDB_Monitor.html
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/show-processlist.html
"Jonathan Stockley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're having a probl
Hi,
We're having a problem with "lock wait timeout exceeded" errors. We are
exclusively using innodb tables apart from the mysql database. The
problem seems to be with the way we are simulating sequences.
There is a table called SEQUENCES defined as follows:
CREATE TABL
this, I found that we had too
many sleeping processes. I was not even able to login to the mysql server
from a command line. Is there a way to set a timeout for sleeping
processes?
This is a small example of what I am seeing when I run a 'show processlist&#
timeout for sleeping
processes?
This is a small example of what I am seeing when I run a 'show processlist'
query:
+--+--+---+---+-+--+---+
--+
| Id | User | Host | db| Command | Time | St
Hello,
Today, I started experiencing some issues on our website with max
connections exceeded errors. In looking into this, I found that we had too
many sleeping processes. I was not even able to login to the mysql server
from a command line. Is there a way to set a timeout for sleeping
owing command.
> "LOAD DATA FROM MASTER" after clearing the data folders in the slave
> machines.
>
> But if shows me a timeout error. I then tired to increase the
> net_read_timeout, net_write_timeout and the wait_timeout. But this
> doesn't seem to work sinc
from the
Master server to the slave machines. I used the following command.
"LOAD DATA FROM MASTER" after clearing the data folders in the slave
machines.
But if shows me a timeout error. I then tired to increase the
net_read_timeout, net_write_timeout and the wait_timeout. But this
d
se
Locked table (pr_prestaciones) was not updated by the query in *** (2)
thanks
Mauricio
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 18:42, Heikki Tuuri wrote:
> Mauricio,
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mauricio Pellegrini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: mailing.datab
Mauricio,
- Original Message -
From: "Mauricio Pellegrini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:13 PM
Subject: Lock timeout problem
Hi, we are using mysql 4.1.4-gamma and a few days ago we started to
receive lock wait
Hi, we are using mysql 4.1.4-gamma and a few days ago we started to
receive lock wait timeout messages from within our application also on
other connections via tcp/ip ( from mysql clients ) the same thing
happens
While we are trying to discover what is causing these errors I've noted
this i
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 16:19 -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> Dale Blount wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been fighting this problem for a while, and now it's time to ask
> > the experts. Please also CC me on this, I'm only on the list as a
> > digest.
>
> Dale:
>
> Enable the log-long-format and log
Dale Blount wrote:
Hello,
I've been fighting this problem for a while, and now it's time to ask
the experts. Please also CC me on this, I'm only on the list as a
digest.
Dale:
Enable the log-long-format and log-slow-queries on your server, and see if you
have some hogs that lock your table for a
l -u user -ppass -h mysql-server databasename -e
"SELECT * FROM table WHERE x = 'y';" > /dev/null; done
I CTRL+C'd it when it took 6 seconds. There was about 30 seconds of very
quick responses that I've left out. This is as simple as I can show it,
I first noticed the
ot backup tool for InnoDB which also backs up MyISAM
tables
http://www.innodb.com/order.php
Order MySQL technical support from https://order.mysql.com/
- Original Message -
From: ""Mr. Gabriele Somthing"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Tu
I believe I have read or skimmed all of the posts to this group with
"Lock", "wait" and "timeout" in their body over the past year (172) with
no answers in sight (if I missed a post, please let me know).
I am unable to figure out what is causing this problem t
[snip]
>Check your mysql system variables for timeout variables (SHOW
>VARIABLES;)
Thanks Jay. After I do this I see there are a number of timeout
values, none which refer to a sql command timeout. Are you able to
pinpont which value I need to manipulate? Also, if I increase this
Check your mysql system variables for timeout variables (SHOW
VARIABLES;)
Thanks Jay. After I do this I see there are a number of timeout
values, none which refer to a sql command timeout. Are you able to
pinpont which value I need to manipulate? Also, if I increase this
value, what are
is no longer summarizing all the
records. When I took out some inlines to shorten the length of time
it takes to execute, all the records once again show up (just some of
the data for each record is not summarized because I took out the
respective inline).
It looks like MySQL has a timeout for
is no longer summarizing all the
records. When I took out some inlines to shorten the length of time
it takes to execute, all the records once again show up (just some of
the data for each record is not summarized because I took out the
respective inline).
It looks like MySQL has a timeout
cause when it happened
originally.
-Original Message-
From: Dathan Vance Pattishall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 2:49 PM
To: Tucker, Gabriel; 'Mysql General (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Innodb Message "Lock wait timeout exceeded; Try restarting
tran
t; To: Mysql General (E-mail)
> Subject: Innodb Message "Lock wait timeout exceeded; Try restarting
> transaction"
>
> Hello All
>
> V4.0.16 on Sun Sparc 5.8
> Innodb_lock_wait_timeout = 50.
>
> A application using jboss got this error a few days ago. The
Hello All
V4.0.16 on Sun Sparc 5.8
Innodb_lock_wait_timeout = 50.
A application using jboss got this error a few days ago. The SQL being used, AFAIK,
was a simple delete from table where date = {date}.
I am trying to determine why this happened. Searching back in the MySQL lists
archives, I
Hi,
Is this possible to set a timeout value for mysql_query() call?
Regards,
- Joe
Currently your timeout values are set for four hours. I would first attempt
to adjusty these to whatever suits your needs. Then connect and see if the
connections are disconnected.
-Original Message-
From: Linda
To: Victor Pendleton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/17/04 9:13 PM
Subject: Re
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 2:13 AM
Subject: RE: query_cache_size will impact timeout variables ?
> These server settings are independent of one another. Query cache size
> should not effect your *_timeout values. Can you post the my.cnf section
> where these values are in
impact timeout variables ?
Hi,
I found out if I set "query_cache_size = 32M" to enable Query Cache,
interactive_timeout and wait_timeout will not be effected. It makes the
connections too many if the connections never timeout. How can I fix it?
Linda
--
MySQL General Mailing Lis
Hi,
I found out if I set "query_cache_size = 32M" to enable Query Cache,
interactive_timeout and wait_timeout will not be effected. It makes the connections
too many if the connections never timeout. How can I fix it?
Linda
programming.
- Original Message -
From: "Victor Pendleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Mojtaba Faridzad '" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 8:34 AM
Subject: RE: how to set timeout process
> You can
timeout process
Hi,
How can I set a timeout in MySQL (mysqld-nt) not to run a query more
than X
minutes? some of queries (when I am testing), make the CPU 100% busy for
a
long time and I cannot kill the process, even when I go to winmysqladmin
and
under "process" I kill the process
Hi,
How can I set a timeout in MySQL (mysqld-nt) not to run a query more than X
minutes? some of queries (when I am testing), make the CPU 100% busy for a
long time and I cannot kill the process, even when I go to winmysqladmin and
under "process" I kill the process but MySQL do
ot;gerald_clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: GET_LOCK(str,timeout) behaviour
> GET_LOCK is just a string lock, and has nothing to do with tables.
> Use L
GET_LOCK is just a string lock, and has nothing to do with tables.
Use LOCK TABLES instead.
Richard Clarke wrote:
The manual indicates that a GET_LOCK expires automatically when a new
GET_LOCK is issued. Can someone explain to me how this behaviour could
possibly be the most useful?
I wish to use
The manual indicates that a GET_LOCK expires automatically when a new
GET_LOCK is issued. Can someone explain to me how this behaviour could
possibly be the most useful?
I wish to use GET_LOCK in my applications to provide advisory locking on
which tables should be used for certain operations. I t
ter time and run
> the same command again - it fails because of some type of timeout. If I
> immediately execute the same command again - it works. What timeout controls
> this behavior?
>
Take a look at wait_timeout and interactive_timeout variables:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/
I am running MySQL version 4.0.18 on a Windows 2000 server system. If I log
in locally as an administrator and issues a command such as "DESCRIBE TABLE
some_table;" - everything works fine. If I come back at a later time and run
the same command again - it fails because of some type of t
With respect to this problem, I am not running on Windows, but Redhat,
and seeing this problem often.
Which part of:
http://www.mysql.com/documentation/connector-j/index.html#id2803835
should i be looking at?
thanks
alan
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.c
Indeed, I am running the server in Windows. I'll take a look at
Troubleshooting 4.4 in depth.
Thanks,
Eric
"Mark Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Eric B. wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently upgraded f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric B. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently upgraded from 4.0.8a to 4.0.18, and am running into a
strange
> error in the JDBC connector. If the DB connection is unused for a
period of
> time (don't konw the minimum amount of time, but 8-12 hours defintiel
Hi,
I've recently upgraded from 4.0.8a to 4.0.18, and am running into a strange
error in the JDBC connector. If the DB connection is unused for a period of
time (don't konw the minimum amount of time, but 8-12 hours defintiely
triggers the problem), I get the following error msg in my stack:
**
a of doing the "scp" of the mysql data directory is not a bad
one, but would require the shutting down of the database (production).
The shutting down of the disaster recovery one isn't a problem... I may
resort to it, but I'd prefer to just figure out which timeout is caus
tion).
The shutting down of the disaster recovery one isn't a problem... I may
resort to it, but I'd prefer to just figure out which timeout is causing
the problem.
Thanks,
Steve Williams
-Original Message-
From: dan orlic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:52 P
nds of the pipe.
>
> The idea of doing the "scp" of the mysql data directory is not a bad
> one, but would require the shutting down of the database (production).
> The shutting down of the disaster recovery one isn't a problem... I may
> resort to it, but I'd
but would
require the shutting down of the database (production). The shutting down of the
disaster recovery one isn't a problem... I may resort to it, but I'd prefer to just
figure out which timeout is causing the problem.
Thanks,
Steve Williams
-Original Message-
From: dan
recovery/backup script that uses =
mysqldump, ssh, mysql to backup an existing database. One of the tables =
is rather large (1 Gig or so), and the time that it takes to "DROP =
TABLE" on an already loaded recover server causes a timeout. I have =
confirmed tested by creating an empty d
Hi,
We have a (pre-existing) disaster recovery/backup script that uses =
mysqldump, ssh, mysql to backup an existing database. One of the tables =
is rather large (1 Gig or so), and the time that it takes to "DROP =
TABLE" on an already loaded recover server causes a timeou
in 4.0.17 on Windows W2000 and NT4
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We have a problem to have "a long life" for the temporary
> table
> > on
> > > > > > innodb
> > > > &
I did similar insert minutes ago with no problems. Now I try to do the same
insert just with differnet parameters and got such error message.
insert into users(first_name, last_name) values('john', 'smith');
ERROR 1205: Lock wait timeout exceeded; Try restarting transaction
I am using tables INNODB.
After one query, the MySQL does not liberate the LOCK, and when I try to
execute same query it appears the message.
#1205 - Lock wait timeout exceeded; Try restarting transaction
whait urgently one helps. thanks, Bruno
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list
rder MySQL support from http://www.mysql.com/support/index.html
..
From: "Randy Chrismon" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Timeout
View: Complete Thread (2 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Date: 2003-12-30 11:12:12 PST
Well now, this is in
>If you run the app again, does it give errors on the same record again?
>If you move the record in question up or down in the sequence of
>inserts, does it still give errors on that record?
Don't know about the commit. I have set autocommit to 250 but that is
connection by connection and I'm usi
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
