After using noclean to keep the files into the directory, how will I
be able to access the directory as normal user?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Piero wrote:
> I downloaded an rpm-package for Realplayer. Can I use RpmDrake in order to
> install it? It looks as if the only available packages for RpmDrake are those
> contained in a list, probably coming from the installation cds, and I do not
> understand how to add a ne
I downloaded an rpm-package for Realplayer. Can I use RpmDrake in order to
install it? It looks as if the only available packages for RpmDrake are those
contained in a list, probably coming from the installation cds, and I do not
understand how to add a new package to this list.
--
Piero
_
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:35:43 +0200
Kaj Haulrich disseminated the following:
> > Every time I try to install a program from rpmdrake, it goes for
> > initializing. I think it is looking for a connection. How can I
> > make rpmdrake not to look for programs on-line. For example I am
> > trying to in
OOzy wrote:
Every time I try to install a program from rpmdrake, it goes for
initializing. I think it is looking for a connection. How can I make
rpmdrake not to look for programs on-line. For example I am trying to
install an FTP client and I am sure there is one on my disks; I don't
want to get o
On Friday 18 June 2004 13:17, OOzy wrote:
> Every time I try to install a program from rpmdrake, it goes for
> initializing. I think it is looking for a connection. How can I
> make rpmdrake not to look for programs on-line. For example I am
> trying to install an FTP client and I am sure there is
Every time I try to install a program from rpmdrake, it goes for
initializing. I think it is looking for a connection. How can I make
rpmdrake not to look for programs on-line. For example I am trying to
install an FTP client and I am sure there is one on my disks; I don't
want to get one from on-l
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 21:03, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
> Well, as it turns out my botched KDE (and other updates) was due to
> that rpmdrake bug (Bugzilla 9411) ... packages were downloading but
> not installing, and remaining in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms.
>
I wonder if thats my problem?
> Given that I
Well, as it turns out my botched KDE (and other updates) was due to that
rpmdrake bug (Bugzilla 9411) ... packages were downloading but not
installing, and remaining in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms.
The bad news is that it threw my system into a state of disarray for
awhile (particularly if, like me, you
On Saturday 06 March 2004 06:09, rhein wrote:
> Hello,
> I try to use rpmdrake to add a medium (contrib file) and I get this
> error message after a long time of waiting...
>
> Unable to update medium...
> Errors:
> urpmi database locked
> urpmi database locked
> retrieve of source hdlist failed
>
rhein wrote:
Hello,
I try to use rpmdrake to add a medium (contrib file) and I get this
error message after a long time of waiting...
Unable to update medium...
Errors:
urpmi database locked
urpmi database locked
retrieve of source hdlist failed
no hdlist file found for medium contrib
problem rea
On Friday 05 March 2004 11:09 pm, rhein wrote:
> Hello,
> I try to use rpmdrake to add a medium (contrib file) and I get this
> error message after a long time of waiting...
>
> Unable to update medium...
> Errors:
> urpmi database locked
> urpmi database locked
> retrieve of source hdlist failed
>
Hello,
I try to use rpmdrake to add a medium (contrib file) and I get this
error message after a long time of waiting...
Unable to update medium...
Errors:
urpmi database locked
urpmi database locked
retrieve of source hdlist failed
no hdlist file found for medium contrib
problem reading synthesi
Thank you - I'm checking it out now.
--
pn
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 08:40:31 -0800
Phil Newcombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why don't I see all packages with rpmdrake? I think it's setup
> properly with ftp mirrors for main, contrib , etc but when I look
> for a package that I Know is on one of the mirrors (Python) it
> doesn't
On Saturday 08 Nov 2003 4:40 pm, Phil Newcombe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why don't I see all packages with rpmdrake? I think it's setup properly
> with ftp mirrors for main, contrib , etc but when I look for a package
> that I Know is on one of the mirrors (Python) it doesn't show up
> anywhere in rpmd
Hi all,
Why don't I see all packages with rpmdrake? I think it's setup properly
with ftp mirrors for main, contrib , etc but when I look for a package
that I Know is on one of the mirrors (Python) it doesn't show up
anywhere in rpmdrake.
Thanks
--
pn
Want to buy your Pack or Services from M
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:43:25 +0100
Philip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered:
>
> When I try to install rpm packages from the Mandrake 9.1 install cds,
> rpmdrake is trying to load them from hdc instead of cdrom2. Any ideas
> on how I would fix this problem?
Go to MCC and make sure the Sources are con
When I try to install rpm packages from the Mandrake 9.1 install cds, rpmdrake
is trying to load them from hdc instead of cdrom2. Any ideas on how I would
fix this problem?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Friday 14 February 2003 08:51 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
>
> You have seen mine I think:
> "Life is good, just don't weaken"
I have two.
The first is "You people are exhausting!"
and the other is "I've gotta go!"
--
Greg
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.
On Friday 14 February 2003 12:47 pm, et wrote:
> On Friday 14 February 2003 09:57 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > >> Gerrofff! That's my line. 'Linux is about choice'
> >
> > Talking about lines...
> > My line is "no one likes whiners"
> >
> > Rob
>
> Ok,, if we are gonna all add their "lines" min
>> Gerrofff! That's my line. 'Linux is about choice'
Talking about lines...
My line is "no one likes whiners"
Rob
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>> I understood that, I just thought that my reply had caught the
>> eye of others
>> who were also a bit hot under the collar, so to speak, and they
>> were hoping
>> for something else to take out of context, I saw your apology and
>> explaination, and I hope everyone that had so much energy over
>> > > What exactly did you mean by that, ed? ;)
>> > >
>> > > LX
>> > >
>> > > >
>> __
>> > "if we don't agree we don't exist"? that statement is so far
>> in left field,
>> > unless it has something to do with part of this th
On Friday 14 Feb 2003 11:14 am, et wrote:
> On Friday 14 February 2003 04:25 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Friday 14 Feb 2003 12:51 am, et wrote:
> > > well really I think it was Anne that made the statement in question;
> > > "OK - if we don't agree, we don't exist" if you made that statement,
> >
On Friday 14 February 2003 04:25 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 14 Feb 2003 12:51 am, et wrote:
> > well really I think it was Anne that made the statement in question; "OK
> > - if we don't agree, we don't exist" if you made that statement, perhaps
> > you would like to explain it.
> > I don't
On Friday 14 Feb 2003 12:51 am, et wrote:
> well really I think it was Anne that made the statement in question; "OK -
> if we don't agree, we don't exist" if you made that statement, perhaps you
> would like to explain it.
> I don't agree with Rush Limbaugh, but I am pretty sure we both exist.
Et
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:11:23 +
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
>
> I have wondered sometimes, though, whether it is always clear where you are
> going to get the update from. I think plf always indicate that in their
> name, (I don't know about others because I don't use them),
>> well really I think it was Anne that made the statement in
>> question; "OK - if
>> we don't agree, we don't exist" if you made that statement,
>> perhaps you would
>> like to explain it.
>> I don't agree with Rush Limbaugh, but I am pretty sure we both exist.
OH, NM
Rob
Want to buy your
On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:59 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> > >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating
> >>
> >> they like the
> >>
> >> > >> > separate programs for RPM installation. Its a hassle
> >> > >>
On Thursday 13 February 2003 11:06 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 10:52, et wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > > >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like
> > > >> > the separate programs for RPM installation. I
On Thursday February 13 2003 10:06 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > the author really should go ahead and start back with the
> > caffeine in their coffee, or less working on beta testting of
> > uubp.
>
> What exactly did you mean by that, ed? ;)
>
> LX
The uubp part? I'm still lookin fo
>> > I dont get this option in my screen. What version of GURPMI are you
>> > using, or whatever package it is?
>>
>> On my 9.0 system it is the stock pkgs
>>
>> urpmi--4.0-20.1mdk
>> gurpmi-4.0-20.1mdk
>> rpmdrake-2.0-27mdk
Ah, this right-click has to be done on the right pane where the descript
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 16:43:32 -0600
"Robert Wideman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dont get this option in my screen. What version of GURPMI are you
> using, or whatever package it is?
On my 9.0 system it is the stock pkgs
urpmi--4.0-20.1mdk
gurpmi-4.0-20.1mdk
rpmdrake-2.0-27mdk
Charles
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 10:43 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> Using rpmdrake right click in the info pane and select "maximum
> >> information"
> >> The info will now include the source repository from which the pkg will
> >> be fetched.
>
> I dont get this option in my screen. What version of GURP
>> Using rpmdrake right click in the info pane and select "maximum
>> information"
>> The info will now include the source repository from which the pkg will
>> be fetched.
I dont get this option in my screen. What version of GURPMI are you using,
or whatever package it is?
Rob
Want to buy yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 February 2003 04:23 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> 1) RpmDrake helps you install software packages
>
> 2) Mandrake Update helps you apply any fixes or upgrades to installed
> packages
>
> 3) Rpmdrake helps you remove software packages
>
> 4)
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 9:03 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:11:23 +
>
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have wondered sometimes, though, whether it is always clear where
> > you are going to get the update from.
>
> Using rpmdrake right click in the info pane
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 14:55, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 02:49 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> > This has gone on so long that I have forgotten the beginning. What are the
> > 4 functions? Under 9.0, add software is among my most-used, remove
> > software comes a good way be
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:11:23 +
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have wondered sometimes, though, whether it is always clear where
> you are going to get the update from.
Using rpmdrake right click in the info pane and select "maximum
information"
The info will now include the sourc
On 12 Feb 2003, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> Well, I've done searches within the newbie and expert lists for
> "rpmdrake" and I see almost no vocality on a positive note for rpmdrake
> 2.1. This isn't from memory, this is from a hard search for "rpmdrake"
> thru all emails I have. My lists here date ba
>> I agree about the Mandrake Choices default, it's really
>> annoying. I would
>> prefer that it remembered your last use, as for most of us it would
>> automaticlly come up with the right choice 95% of times.
I totally agree. Same with asking for a password going into it since i
always do it f
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 8:00 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> This has gone on so long that I have forgotten the beginning.
> >> What are the 4
> >> functions? Under 9.0, add software is among my most-used,
> >> remove software
> >> comes a good way behind that. What are the other two?
>
> Sources
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:54 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> Well, I've done searches within the newbie and expert lists for
> "rpmdrake" and I see almost no vocality on a positive note for rpmdrake
> 2.1. This isn't from memory, this is from a hard search for "rpmdrake"
> thru all emails I have
On Thursday 13 February 2003 08:08 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> Dude, go take some morphine (or your favorite illegal drug) and space out
> for a while.
>
>
>
> Rob
True..he's way out of line with that comment and that finally convinced me not
to vote for the "old" rpmdrake in list of rpm's we wa
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 5:47 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:33, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > my interpatation of statements like this is either it is no so freaking
> > > far out of context no one can possibly figure it out, or the author
> > > really should go ahead and sta
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:17 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:51, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> >Now Lyvim, I believe you read the cooker list and should know this
> > was all hammered out, fuss'd about, reasons given, and concessions
> > made months ago on the cooker list. If
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 12:33, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > my interpatation of statements like this is either it is no so freaking far
> > out of context no one can possibly figure it out, or the author
> > really should go ahead and start back with the caffeine in their
> > coffee, or less worki
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 4:00 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like
> > >> > the separate programs for RPM installation. Its
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 3:52 pm, et wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like
> > >> > the separate programs for RPM installation. Its a hassle
> > >>
> > >> switching between the
> > >>
> > >> >
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 20:32, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:17 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > Behind the scenes the "engine(s)" may be new and improved,
>
> That is why it was changed
>
> > but the interface just isn't getting it.
>
> That is your opinion, not a fact.
Gla
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 20:22, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> On Wednesday February 12 2003 03:17 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> > I used to could start rpmdrake 1.4 from an Eterm and then as I
> > conducted actions in the UI, it would report back to Eterm exactly
> > what it was doing, connecting to, unpacking, i
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 10:52, et wrote:
> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like the
> > >> > separate programs for RPM installation. Its a hassle
> > >>
> > >> switching between the
> > >>
> > >> > dif
>> Boy you are some kind of arrogant, arent you? Why in the hell are you
>> trying to tell *me* what MY point is? I know full well what I was
>> saying, and I know you don't give a rat's damn about it. So don't try to
>> restate *my* point; you keep your restatements of anything restricted to
>>
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 20:15, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> On Wed 2003-02-12 at 17:54:48 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 16:52, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
> [...]
> > > I wonder how often you change your sources, if you need to keep it
> > > open...
> >
> > The point is that
>> On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
>> > >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating
>> they like the
>> > >> > separate programs for RPM installation. Its a hassle
>> > >>
>> > >> switching between the
>> > >>
>> > >> > different progs.
>> > >>
>> > >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like the
> >> > separate programs for RPM installation. Its a hassle
> >>
> >> switching between the
> >>
> >> > different
On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:43 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like the
> >> > separate programs for RPM installation. Its a hassle
> >>
> >> switching between the
> >>
> >> > different progs.
> >>
> >> OK - if we don't agree, we do
>> > (An example of a neglected new feature is the Samba setup
>> wizard - To set
>> > up a basic Samba server, all you have to do is press the Samba wizard
>> > button in Mandrake Control Centre.
Is there such a samba wizard? I dont have it installed, using NFS which i
am not liking.
Rob
Wan
>> > I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like the
>> > separate programs for RPM installation. Its a hassle
>> switching between the
>> > different progs.
>>
>> OK - if we don't agree, we don't exist.
Not understanding what you meant by this.
Rob
Want to buy your Pac
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 7:59 am, Vahur Lokk wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 22:32, you wrote:
> > (An example of a neglected new feature is the Samba setup wizard - To set
> > up a basic Samba server, all you have to do is press the Samba wizard
> > button in Mandrake Control Centre.
>
> Aaa
On Wednesday 12 Feb 2003 10:49 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >>Tho many were vocal (as you are) about the changes, the logic and
> >> reasons for it as given by the Mdk. developers were compelling if not
> >> convincing, and much progress has been made with the new versions
> >> since.
>
> I have
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 22:32, you wrote:
> (An example of a neglected new feature is the Samba setup wizard - To set
> up a basic Samba server, all you have to do is press the Samba wizard
> button in Mandrake Control Centre.
Aaarrg
Guess what I spent all
>> On Wednesday February 12 2003 08:21 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
>> > This info is VERY useful for prep work on PLF DL's. You dont know
>> > how many libraries are illegal in the US (DMCA laws) and can not be
>> > DL through GURPMI for progs on PLF. pbone.net is great for this
>> > since it gets
or pbone.net ? Get around what?
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom
> >> Brinkman Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:54 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: [ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 08:16 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 05:54 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> > >> No matter how many people vote to put nVidia
> > >> drivers in the
> > >> distro, they won't go in.
> >
> > This is b/c of
ECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Brinkman
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 7:54 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [newbie] Rpmdrake in 9.1 needs to be stomped and burned
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday February 12 2003 03:30 pm, Jer
On Wednesday February 12 2003 03:30 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
> so, since rpmdrake's become enigmatic, anyone know what command
> used to query a package BEFORE istallation to list every file it's
> going to install (and where) so i could, for example, out the
> output to a text file and read it firs
>> the most important feature of 8.2's rpmdrake was that you could
>> see... right there in front of you... what files it would put
>> where if you installed it. with rpmdrake in 9.0 it's not there.
>> I can't figure out HOW on EARTH to tell WHAT FILES a package
>> installs so some rpms get insta
>> I am somewhat new to the cooker list, and I just migrated to 9.1 beta.
>> The difference is that now I've actually made the transition from
>> "theory" to "practice" in my involvement with rpmdrake 2.x, and it isn't
>> positive. I just don't believe the 4-way interface is as good as
>> rpmdrake
>> No matter how many people vote to put nVidia
>> drivers in the
>> distro, they won't go in.
This is b/c of the nVidia license, not the voting of users. Correct?
Rob
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
>>Tho many were vocal (as you are) about the changes, the logic and
>> reasons for it as given by the Mdk. developers were compelling if not
>> convincing, and much progress has been made with the new versions
>> since.
I have not seen one posting to Newbie OR Expert stating they like the
sepa
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:09 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> Now try running the "new and improved" rpmdrake from an Eterm. It puts
> you into "software packages installation" mode. Can you affect what
> mode you want it to go into? Not according to rpmdrake --help. There
> is not a method
On Wed 2003-02-12 at 14:30:04 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> the most important feature of 8.2's rpmdrake was that you could
> see... right there in front of you... what files it would put where
> if you installed it. with rpmdrake in 9.0 it's not there.
Choose "maximum information". If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:54 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>
> Well, I've done searches within the newbie and expert lists for
> "rpmdrake" and I see almost no vocality on a positive note for rpmdrake
> 2.1. This isn't from memory, this is from a har
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 16:15, Greg Meyer wrote:
> I just recall many discussions on a.o.l.m back during beta testing of 9.0
> discussing this very thing, with some people liking it and some people hating
> it. I also recall the Cooker discussion during the development process that
> spelled out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:45 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
> OH! Greg you're a godsend!
> (what an odd way to do it... i never would have thought to do that... why
> isn't there a big huge sign saying "right click the right pane and choose
> maximum
On Wednesday 12 Feb 2003 9:45 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:36:14 -0500
>
> Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:30 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
> > > this was changed in 9.0 and I was quit
Aside from Tom's insighful comments[1], to set some facts straight...
On Wednesday February 12 2003 01:09 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
[...]
> thing. In LM91 beta 3, to duplicate the functionality of one LM82
> Rpmdrake UI instance, you must activate all four icon instances of
> rpmdrake listed in MC
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:36:14 -0500
Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:30 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
> > this was changed in 9.0 and I was quite disappointed it with it too, ttytt.
> > the most important feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:30 pm, Jerry Barton wrote:
> this was changed in 9.0 and I was quite disappointed it with it too, ttytt.
> the most important feature of 8.2's rpmdrake was that you could see...
> right there in front of you... what fil
On 12 Feb 2003 14:09:03 -0500
Lyvim Xaphir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rpmdrake in LM82 was very eloquent and I got addicted to it in record
> time; all functions right there at your fingertips, including
> update/install/removal/source configuration. I got used to using it
> almost on a daily
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:51, Tom Brinkman wrote:
>Now Lyvim, I believe you read the cooker list and should know this
> was all hammered out, fuss'd about, reasons given, and concessions
> made months ago on the cooker list. If I'm terribly wrong, then
> search the cooker archives back in O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 03:51 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
> I hate to argue with you Lyvim, but I found th 8.2 version a tad confusing.
> Sure it was all there, but somehow I was never sure that I was seeing
> what I wanted to find. Perhaps it was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 03:17 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> >
> > If you are still on 8.2, you must have missed the fact that the new
> > rpmdrake was introduced in 9.0 to quite favorable reaction.
>
> Favorable reaction where, exactly? I haven't se
SNIP
>
>BTW, in the recent discussions of updating 9.1b3 from mirrors, I
> failed to mention there's a new tool 'urpmi.setup' available. A
> little GUI tool for the CL challenged to use urpmi. 'Course I haven't
> used it ;)urpmi.setup-0.4.2-1mdk
Gosh. I like it :-)
urpmi.setup seems to
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 14:39, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 February 2003 02:09 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> >
> > The positive side to all this is that in the Mandrakeclub RPM voting
> > page, you can let it be known if you do not like LM9X Rpmdrake by
> > casting your vote for Ctardif's entry,
On Wednesday February 12 2003 01:09 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> Whew. I tell you what guysI love 9.1 in general and so far
> things have been working OK. But this new rpmdrake UI is the worst
> idea I've seen in a long long time. I wish I had one or two
> gallons of holy water, some wooden sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 02:09 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>
> The positive side to all this is that in the Mandrakeclub RPM voting
> page, you can let it be known if you do not like LM9X Rpmdrake by
> casting your vote for Ctardif's entry, listed as
Whew. I tell you what guysI love 9.1 in general and so far things
have been working OK. But this new rpmdrake UI is the worst idea I've
seen in a long long time. I wish I had one or two gallons of holy
water, some wooden stakes and some nightvision goggles so I could put
this undead monster
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 07:01, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> I suggest you do
> >> urpmi.removemedia -ac
> >> to remove *all* sources and start again.
> >>
> >>
> >> just to remind you in case you missed yesterdays post. To put
> >> your CD sources
> >> in, insert CD1 in your CD drive then
> >>
>
>> I suggest you do
>> urpmi.removemedia -ac
>> to remove *all* sources and start again.
>>
>>
>> just to remind you in case you missed yesterdays post. To put
>> your CD sources
>> in, insert CD1 in your CD drive then
>>
>> urpmi.addmedia --distrib removable:///mnt/cdrom
Ok, did that. At this po
>> I suggest you do
>> urpmi.removemedia -ac
>> to remove *all* sources and start again.
>>
>>
>> just to remind you in case you missed yesterdays post. To put
>> your CD sources
>> in, insert CD1 in your CD drive then
>>
>> urpmi.addmedia --distrib removable:///mnt/cdrom
Ok, did that. At this po
On Tuesday 21 Jan 2003 9:44 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
> >> I suggest you do
> >> urpmi.removemedia -ac
> >> to remove *all* sources and start again.
> >>
> >>
> >> just to remind you in case you missed yesterdays post. To put
> >> your CD sources
> >> in, insert CD1 in your CD drive then
> >>
> >>
>> I suggest you do
>> urpmi.removemedia -ac
>> to remove *all* sources and start again.
>>
>>
>> just to remind you in case you missed yesterdays post. To put
>> your CD sources
>> in, insert CD1 in your CD drive then
>>
>> urpmi.addmedia --distrib removable:///mnt/cdrom
Ok, did that. At this po
On Monday 20 Jan 2003 7:44 pm, Robert Wideman wrote:
> # urpmi.addmedia Updates ftp://ftp.wtfo.com/pub/linux/mandrake/updates with
> ../base/hdlist.cz
> syntax error in config file at line 28
> unable to find hdlist file for "Updates-MDK9", medium ignored
> added medium Updates
SNIP
Something is w
# urpmi.addmedia Updates ftp://ftp.wtfo.com/pub/linux/mandrake/updates with
../base/hdlist.cz
syntax error in config file at line 28
unable to find hdlist file for "Updates-MDK9", medium ignored
added medium Updates
examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.Installation CD 1
(x86) (
On Monday 20 Jan 2003 6:38 am, Rob Wideman wrote:
> I am having issues where rpmdrake (Software Sources
> Manager) will not update when i add/delete something
> AND it closes when i hit the "Remove" button.
>
> So i have found the /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg files and
> removed the lines that i didnt want
I am having issues where rpmdrake (Software Sources
Manager) will not update when i add/delete something
AND it closes when i hit the "Remove" button.
So i have found the /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg files and
removed the lines that i didnt want. They are not
listed anymore. The problem that i still hav
On Thursday January 9 2003 02:41 am, Tuija wrote:
> Viestissä Keskiviikko 8. Tammikuuta 2003 18:35, Tom Brinkman
kirjoitti:
> >as root,
> >urpmi.update -a ...will update all sources you've installed
> >urpmi --auto-select ...will get the updates. Or better yet,
> >urpmi.update -
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
