On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:14, Gica Strimbu wrote:
Does anybody know how to run a windows program in mandrake 9.2. Is an
emulator or something for this ? I need to run a small program for decoding
a tv card and i don't have a linux version. thanks
You just want to view normal, un-encrypted TV from
Does anybody know how to run a windows program in
mandrake 9.2. Isan emulator or something for this ? I need to run a small
program for decoding a tv card and i don't have a linux version.
thanks
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 03:14 am, Gica Strimbu wrote:
Does anybody know how to run a windows program in mandrake 9.2. Is an
emulator or something for this ? I need to run a small program for decoding
a tv card and i don't have a linux version. thanks
You could try Wine or Transgamings'
Thank you
- Original Message -
From: Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] windows-mandrake
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 03:14 am, Gica Strimbu wrote:
Does anybody know how to run a windows program
From: H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
On Thursday 02 December 2004 10:26, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Maybe I'm paranoid, but after that experience we don't allow her
Windows box contact with anything outside her room.
You are;) Confined to the LAN can't really hurt can it, especially with
On Thursday 02 December 2004 21:30, Simon Roberts wrote:
From: H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
On Thursday 02 December 2004 10:26, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Maybe I'm paranoid, but after that experience we don't allow her
Windows box contact with anything outside her room.
You are;)
Hello H.J.Bathoorn,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 12:49:07 PM, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
HJB On Thursday 02 December 2004 21:30, Simon Roberts wrote:
These things will, by default, download and execute various things
you probably didn't want. This is compounded by the average user's
response to the
On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:14, rikona wrote:
Hello H.J.Bathoorn,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 12:49:07 PM, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
HJB On Thursday 02 December 2004 21:30, Simon Roberts wrote:
These things will, by default, download and execute various things
you probably didn't want. This
On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:45, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
snip
Keeping Windows off the net is much better. I'm surprised how
little uproar (actually total silence) there was here in the
Netherlands when they rounded up a bunch of alleged Islamic
terrorists who had threatened a right wing
On Friday 03 December 2004 00:03, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
/snip
Agreed. At last Microsoft did something good.
Kaj Haulrich.
Actually I'm not all together thrilled at the idea.
A large multinational enterprise (with a very stained legal and moral
reputation) has more information than
Hello H.J.Bathoorn,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 2:45:12 PM, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
HJB Downside is that calypso has a strange way of compressing it's
HJB backups..if it realy crashes there's hardly a way to salvage
HJB old mail archives.
Oooo - wouldn't touch that one, I'm afraid. Got burned
Hello Kaj,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 3:03:04 PM, Kaj wrote:
KH On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:45, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
KH snip
Keeping Windows off the net is much better. I'm surprised how
little uproar (actually total silence) there was here in the
Netherlands when they rounded up a bunch
On Friday 03 December 2004 00:27, rikona wrote:
Hello Kaj,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 3:03:04 PM, Kaj wrote:
KH On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:45, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
KH snip
Keeping Windows off the net is much better. I'm surprised how
little uproar (actually total silence) there
Hello Kaj,
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 3:42:07 PM, Kaj wrote:
KH On Friday 03 December 2004 00:27, rikona wrote:
KH Agreed. At last Microsoft did something good.
I'd have to disagree. It is a rather large invasion of privacy,
which is a larger topic, but we should move this to the OT
Hi,
I have a mandrake 9.1 installed, and currently the system is
configured that authentication happens against the /etc/passwd file on
the local system.
My linux pc is partly used as a fileserver for a couple windows XP
2K boxes that are in a WORKGROUP, no NT Domain. On all computers, the
Dnia czw 26. sierpnia 2004 14:45, Peter Davis napisa:
I have a home network with two Windows XP systems and one Mandrake
10.0. (Wrong proportions, I know.) The Mandrake system is new, and I'm
trying to figure out how I can get file sharing to work across systems.
I can't seem to see a WinXP
Peter, replies are inline with your text:
Peter Davis wrote:
I have a home network with two Windows XP systems and one Mandrake
10.0. (Wrong proportions, I know.) The Mandrake system is new, and I'm
trying to figure out how I can get file sharing to work across systems.
I can't seem to see a
Couldn't really make it up could you?
A year late, billions of dollars, out less than 24 hours, and now:
http://secunia.com/advisories/12321
Advise your friends running XP sp2 to turn off Active Scripting.
--
pm
___
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make
my
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:44:51 +0300
PM disseminated the following:
Couldn't really make it up could you?
A year late, billions of dollars, out less than 24 hours, and now:
http://secunia.com/advisories/12321
Advise your friends running XP sp2 to turn off Active Scripting.
I like this
Hi Guys
I'm trying to have a play with vmware but need to create a windows boot disk
to load XP. Unfortunately I don't have a windows system to create this boot
disk on.
Can anyone tell me how tp create one using mandrake 10.
Before anyone asks, my wifes a bean counter and to get her to use
On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 00:20, Mark Annandale wrote:
Hi Guys
I'm trying to have a play with vmware but need to create a windows boot disk
to load XP. Unfortunately I don't have a windows system to create this boot
disk on.
Can anyone tell me how tp create one using mandrake 10.
Before
Mark Annandale wrote:
Hi Guys
I'm trying to have a play with vmware but need to create a windows boot disk
to load XP. Unfortunately I don't have a windows system to create this boot
disk on.
Can anyone tell me how tp create one using mandrake 10.
Before anyone asks, my wifes a bean counter and
Sure, that would probably be helpful.
Thanks,
Yves
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn
Sent: May 27, 2004 5:21 PM
To: Mandrake Newbie
Subject: Re: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 21:53
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 21:11, Yves Arsenault wrote:
Sure, that would probably be helpful.
Thanks,
Yves
Bear in mind that you're going to have to create a group - for users
that use this machine or have accounts on this machine - and sync them
with the windows users. It ain't really that
Thank you very much Stephen.
The adventure begins.
:-)
YVes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn
Sent: May 28, 2004 2:48 PM
To: Mandrake Newbie
Subject: RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10
On Fri, 2004-05-28
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 03:53, Yves Arsenault wrote:
Thank you very much Stephen.
The adventure begins.
:-)
YVes
Yves, I think you'll have fun once you realise how simple it really is;
Samba is truly a saviour in as much as it can not only emulate an NT
domain but control one better than
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn
Sent: May 28, 2004 3:09 PM
To: Mandrake Newbie
Subject: RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 03:53, Yves Arsenault wrote:
Thank you very much Stephen.
The adventure begins.
:-)
YVes
Hello,
I was wondering if it was possible to run a Mandrake 10 server as a windows
type domain controller for a local network?
Yves
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club :
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 21:53, Yves Arsenault wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if it was possible to run a Mandrake 10 server as a windows
type domain controller for a local network?
Yves
Not that version matters, but my system here, a MDK 9.1+ setup with
Samba 2.2.8a is an NT domain
On Tuesday 27 Apr 2004 09:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Er...I think we've been through this already (day late and a dollar
short) NYAH!
I rolled over and took it like a Man in the end
I reinstalled, and whilst I was at it, set aside 3GB as FAT32, and reloaded
'98 on my main drive. It's
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 01:55, JRH wrote:
On Tuesday 27 Apr 2004 09:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Er...I think we've been through this already (day late and a dollar
short) NYAH!
I rolled over and took it like a Man in the end
I reinstalled, and whilst I was at it, set aside 3GB as
On Tuesday 27 Apr 2004 19:51, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
So now you should be able to point lilo to the /dev/hda1 and boot - have
you tried that now?
Not yet.
havent had chance! Just been setting up a Lexmark (spit) printer on my
neighbours Windows (spit) computer.
Once I have had a coffee and
On Tuesday 27 April 2004 05:14 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 20:07, Frank wrote:
Good call Tina.
...ya ain't allowed to agree with her! (grin)
(...reckon I'll sleep on the lounge tonight)
stephen kuhn - owner
I thought we were not supposed to agree with Joe! You can't have
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 12:41, Dennis Myers wrote:
On Tuesday 27 April 2004 05:14 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 20:07, Frank wrote:
Good call Tina.
...ya ain't allowed to agree with her! (grin)
(...reckon I'll sleep on the lounge tonight)
stephen kuhn - owner
I
Hi all.
Until a week ago, Windows used to share my HDD alongside Linux.
Then, last weekend, MS-DOS decided it was going to ruin my Linux install (with
a little help from me inadvertently I guess!). I have tried to survive
without a Windows partition, but In reality, I cant.
I have loaded up
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 21:06, JRH wrote:
Hi all.
Until a week ago, Windows used to share my HDD alongside Linux.
Then, last weekend, MS-DOS decided it was going to ruin my Linux install (with
a little help from me inadvertently I guess!). I have tried to survive
without a Windows
On Sunday 25 Apr 2004 12:28, Stephen Kuhn wrote: JRH
After you edited the /etc/lilo.conf - did you re-run lilo?
Ahh hold up Stephen.
I used the GUI tool to alter things. looks like it hasnt saved it!
I've noticed it has a habit of doing stuff like that, for example, when I copy
Stephen,
Did as you suggested, and still no joy!
I select windows at the lilo screen, and it just hangs there now have
to use the reset switch to get it back again.
I have pasted my lilo.conf file contents below. Doubtless to say, I'm doing
something wrong here... but what?? :-)
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 22:21, JRH wrote:
Stephen,
Did as you suggested, and still no joy!
I select windows at the lilo screen, and it just hangs there now have
to use the reset switch to get it back again.
I have pasted my lilo.conf file contents below. Doubtless to say, I'm
Alle 14:35, domenica 25 aprile 2004, Stephen Kuhn ha scritto:
try this as well:
other=/dev/hdd1
label=windows
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 22:21, JRH wrote:
Stephen,
Did as you suggested, and still no joy!
I select windows at the lilo screen, and it just hangs there now
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 01:36, jeb wrote:
Ok, then..How do I do it linux to linux?
If you're using Mandrake: Just ssh, Mdk has X forwarding enabled by
default. Otherwise you need the X flag, thus: ssh -X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You cannot get the whole interface to run remotely (VNC does that well
I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my
windows box?
I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I
am running putty with x11 forwarding on. However, I login fine but when
I launch x as a normal user I get :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jebba]$
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:01, jeb wrote:
I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my
windows box?
I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I
am running putty with x11 forwarding on. However, I login fine but when
I launch x as a
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:01:48 -0500
jeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my
windows box?
cygwin with XFree86
I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I
am running putty with x11 forwarding on.
Ok, then..How do I do it linux to linux?
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:01, jeb wrote:
I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my
windows box?
I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I
am running putty with x11
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:36, jeb wrote:
Ok, then..How do I do it linux to linux?
SSH.
(That is, if you're using the same version/distro)
stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
I'am having the same problem with Mandrake Move can't change the screen
resolution.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen
Dear All
Some
with a USB storage
device, your changes will be lost when you quit MMove.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen
Dear All
Some windows are bigger than
Dear All
Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with
accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty?
Thank you a lot in advance!
Paul
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with
accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty?
Thank you a lot in advance!
Paul
Hold down the ALT key and drag the window so you can access the buttons..
--
rgds
Frank
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 04:57:15PM +, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with
accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty?
Thank you a lot in advance!
It probably depends on your window manager, but try
Set your screen resolution to a higher DPI. I recommend 1024 X 768.
That should fix the problem.
Jim
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 10:57, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All
Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with
accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this
At 11:57 AM 3/24/04, Paul Smith wrote:
Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with
accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty?
1) Buy a bigger monitor
2) Change resolution
3) Memorise how many times you need to hit tab key to get to 'OK'
Used to be $99 and is now free. Shock of shocks.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/14/1738230
Miark
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
I have Mandrake Linux 9.2 up and running on a PC I hope to use as a file
server. I have two additional PCs running Windows 98SE in a peer-to-peer
network configuration. One of them also supplies an ADSL connection to all
PCs in my network (I used to have 3 running 98). The ADSL PC runs WinRoute
Hi, on my prior Mandrake sistems (9.1,9.0,8)
if you whant to use the DHCP option, you must have a
HDCP server that provides you the control of the
addresses over youre net.
So if you don't have it, the easyest thing you can do
is use the static ip address assigned by youre selfe.
For using
To set up a file server for windows machines you need to install the
samba server package - it's on your MDK installation disks, use Software
Package Management from Mandrake Control Center. To configure samba
server you should read the Samba-HOWTO, just to know what you're doing.
To check if
On Wednesday 03 Dec 2003 3:35 pm, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
To set up a file server for windows machines you need to install
the samba server package - it's on your MDK installation disks, use
Software Package Management from Mandrake Control Center. To
configure samba server you should read the
Thanks for the replies. I have my linux PC successfully connected to my
network with internet access now. I think I was selecting linux-secure
from the bootloader instead of linux. That locks everything down doesn't
it? If so, that was my problem. Now on to Samba!
Chris
Want to buy your
just a thing... the linux secure option from the boot
loader means some thing like on windows fail proof
mode... where you have running only the escential
services and is used to fix some thing that doesnt
work... like video settings or services that hang the
system.
the secure option doesn't
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article09-115
Is Windows a Virus?
No, Windows is not a virus. Here's what viruses do:
* They replicate quickly - okay, Windows does that.
* Viruses use up valuable system resources, slowing down the system
as they do so - okay, Windows does that.
The recent report by the CCIA gave us an academic viewpoint as to why
Windows is a blight on the Internet.
This article provides a concrete example as to why Windows machines
should be disconnected from the Internet, quarantined, and otherwise
shut out, wherever possible, until MS decides to
On Thursday October 9 2003 08:08 am, HaywireMac wrote:
The recent report by the CCIA gave us an academic viewpoint as to
why Windows is a blight on the Internet.
This article provides a concrete example as to why Windows
machines should be disconnected from the Internet, quarantined,
and
Specially since a
lot of Windoze users refuse to believe they're infected, or do
anything about it even if they are. Usual response is I'm not
havin any problems. Besides I have a virus checker and use Zone
Alarm.
If microsoft was smart, they would, upon discovering these security
holes,
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:37:48 -0500
Tom Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Still if I showed up to them as a false positive, I can only
wonder how many infected Winblows users they miss detecting. OTOH,
disconnecting many Winsuz users, even just the infected ones, would
put any ISP out
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:08:15 -0400
HaywireMac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recent report by the CCIA gave us an academic viewpoint as to
why Windows is a blight on the Internet.
This article provides a concrete example as to why Windows
machines should be disconnected from the Internet,
Hello Tom,
Thursday, October 9, 2003, 8:37:48 AM, you wrote:
TB I can only wonder if I might have showed up in SBC's logs as
TB receiving infected email from Winsux users.
Perhaps someone spoofed your address and SBC doesn't know/care who
really sent it.
--
rikona
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:41 pm, rikona wrote:
Hello Tom,
Thursday, October 9, 2003, 8:37:48 AM, you wrote:
TB I can only wonder if I might have showed up in SBC's logs as
TB receiving infected email from Winsux users.
Perhaps someone spoofed your address and SBC doesn't know/care
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 14:41, rikona wrote:
Hello Tom,
Thursday, October 9, 2003, 8:37:48 AM, you wrote:
TB I can only wonder if I might have showed up in SBC's logs as
TB receiving infected email from Winsux users.
Perhaps someone spoofed your address and SBC doesn't know/care who
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Windows version of Konqueror and Kmail.
Hi,
Is there a windows version of Konqueror or Kmail?
I am dual booting and I want the same browser and mail program on both
systems. I can use mozilla
Dennis,
As a rule of thumb, if your firewall is running NAT (and they usually
do) and you're not forwarding ports to Windows machines on your side of
the wall, then you're safe from outside-in attacks.
Miark
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500, Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2003 02:45 pm, Miark wrote:
Dennis,
As a rule of thumb, if your firewall is running NAT (and they usually
do) and you're not forwarding ports to Windows machines on your side of
the wall, then you're safe from outside-in attacks.
Miark
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500
Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar deal with MS?
--
HaywireMac
If you would know the value of money, go try to borrow some.
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
The above is a Govt. warning on Internet attacks on Windows systems. I don't
know a great deal about that kind of attack, so if I have the windows machine
behind a router and a linux firewall will this afford some protection
Haywiremac wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500
Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar deal with MS?
I believe they did. Another demonstration that *only* the
On Thursday 31 July 2003 02:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Haywiremac wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500
Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar deal with MS?
I
Dennis Myers wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Haywiremac wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500
Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
didn't the DHS *just sign* a
On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Haywiremac wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500
Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar deal with MS?
I
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 05:03, Dennis Myers wrote:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
The above is a Govt. warning on Internet attacks on Windows systems. I don't
know a great deal about that kind of attack, so if I have the windows machine
behind a router and a
On Thursday 31 July 2003 02:55 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Haywiremac wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500
Dennis Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
didn't
On Thursday 31 July 2003 06:21 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 05:03, Dennis Myers wrote:
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm
The above is a Govt. warning on Internet attacks on Windows systems. I
don't know a great deal about that kind of
On Saturday 22 Mar 2003 9:51 am, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2003 10:30 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 21 Mar 2003 11:31 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Friday 21 March 2003 11:38 pm, Francisco Alcaraz
Anne, when I edited fstab to include umask=0 0 0 the problem
went away.
Kaj
At 12:49 AM 3/22/03, David E. Fox wrote:
That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I tried to=20
become root and change the permissions by issuing the=20
command : chmod 777 * .
That's because FAT32 doesn't implement permissions the same way - so a
chmod wouldn't have any effect, and
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:51 pm, Frank Bax wrote:
At 12:49 AM 3/22/03, David E. Fox wrote:
That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I tried to=20
become root and change the permissions by issuing the=20
command : chmod 777 * .
That's because FAT32 doesn't implement
Hi all...
For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had no
security at all. Until today.
But first things first : I don't have Windows on my box. In
no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake 9.0.
Well, a modification is needed here :
My box is set up with 4 users : My ever-beloved
Kaj,
Try to pass an scandisk to your windows partition, I had a similar problem
long times ago due to disk-error; mandrake couldn't write in the partition
but after pass an scandisk windows detected several errors and repaired it.
Until that moment mandrake could again write on the windows
Kaj,
You can't change permisions on VFAT filesystems from the commandline. You
have to specify it at mount time. Make sure your fstab entries have
umask=0 0 0.
Miark
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:08:02 +0100
Kaj Haulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all...
For the last 7 years or so I thought
On Friday 21 March 2003 11:38 pm, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
wrote:
Kaj,
Try to pass an scandisk to your windows partition, I had
a similar problem long times ago due to disk-error;
mandrake couldn't write in the partition but after pass
an scandisk windows detected several errors and repaired
On Friday 21 March 2003 05:08 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Hi all...
For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had no
security at all. Until today.
But first things first : I don't have Windows on my box. In
no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake 9.0.
Well, a modification is
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:09 am, Miark wrote:
Kaj,
You can't change permisions on VFAT filesystems from the
commandline. You have to specify it at mount time. Make
sure your fstab entries have umask=0 0 0.
Miark
Thanks Miark - that did the trick !
Kaj Haulrich.
--
Registered Linux
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:44 am, et wrote:
On Friday 21 March 2003 05:08 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
Hi all...
For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had
no security at all. Until today.
But first things first : I don't have Windows on my
box. In no way, manner, shape or
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 02:22, Guy Rouillier wrote:
Both of these statements are untrue for Win2k/XP. I read somewhere
(sorry, don't remember where - I'm pretty sure it was on the ext2
project page) that there is an apparently fairly stable filesystem
driver for Win2k/XP that allows it to use
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 01:22 am, Guy Rouillier wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MDK Mandrake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot
Winblows don't support any Linux
.
One
way round it for us is to install XP on fat32, create the ghost image and then
convert from fat32 to NTFS.
-Original Message-From: Brian
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 10 March 2003 7:12
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [newbie]
Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual BootSo
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:20, et wrote:
I KNOW that there are 3rd party utilities to allow win2k/xp to use EXT2
filesystems, but I would not trust them as much as I trust linus on any
filesystem, and sure would HATE to loose important data just cause I wanted
to try stuff out
that said
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 07:35 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:20, et wrote:
I KNOW that there are 3rd party utilities to allow win2k/xp to use EXT2
filesystems, but I would not trust them as much as I trust linus on any
filesystem, and sure would HATE to loose important
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:30, et wrote:
this is correct, however I believe Civileme is refering to the boot-up record,
not the ability to see and read files.
I have WINme, Mandrake 9.0 and WIN2K installed all over my drives here is what
# df says;
Filesystem 1K-blocks
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 08:38 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:30, et wrote:
this is correct, however I believe Civileme is refering to the boot-up
record, not the ability to see and read files.
I have WINme, Mandrake 9.0 and WIN2K installed all over my drives here is
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 08:38 am, Adolfo Bello wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:30, et wrote:
this is correct, however I believe Civileme is refering to the boot-up
record, not the ability to see and read files.
I have WINme, Mandrake 9.0 and WIN2K installed all over my drives here is
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 02:12 pm, Brian wrote:
Why are you so insistant on ntfs? The security
aspects get blown out the door by installing Linux, so I cannot imagine that
the speed is that much better to make it a requirement.
Greg,
Again, I am looking to continue to use
1 - 100 of 520 matches
Mail list logo
