On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:58 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:49 -0400, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:42 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:18 -0700,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 14:45 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:58 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:49 -0400, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:42 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at
lurking? ( was : Ext / Temp repository
stability ( was Extensions and templates site down ))
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:58 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:49 -0400, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:42 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew
Subject: Re: [www] Any Drupal guru's lurking? ( was : Ext / Temp repository
stability ( was Extensions and templates site down ))
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
While hosting non-OSS plugins is probably out,
I
On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:14 PM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
While hosting non-OSS plugins is probably out,
I don't see why we can't host
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 13:27 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:14 PM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
While hosting
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:14 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
On Aug 16, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:26 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:14 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would
The site (particularly templates) seems hinky, bad, and has for a over a
day now, once again.
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 17:37 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
snip
We will have to
find an
alternative repository
snip
We Need to fix the current one
- the fact that LibreOffice will open yet
2011.08.14. 15:07 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:26 AM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
The site (particularly templates) seems hinky, bad, and has for a over a
day now, once again.
Do we know what the underlying issue is? Is it load related?
I don't know, may be not
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 09:07 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:26 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
The site (particularly templates) seems hinky, bad, and has for a over a
day now, once again.
Do we know what the underlying issue is? Is it load related?
Do we have
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 15:31 +0200, Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
2011.08.14. 15:07 keltezéssel, Rob Weir írta:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:26 AM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
The site (particularly templates) seems hinky, bad, and
Hi Rob,
On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
including some that are not open source. Is that correct?
Yes.
Another option, which I brought up the last time this topic was
discussed on the list, is that we
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
including some that are not open source. Is that correct?
Yes.
I for one agree with this expansive
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:14 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 09:07 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
Or is this something that could be moved to apache-extras.org ?
Hola Rob,
We would get slammed with license issues, wouldn't we?
- at least that is what I think. If we are
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
including some that are not open
Here is what an OSUOSL admin said in July when this happened last:
Looks like varnish died on the machine and I just kicked it. The site(s)
should be back online now.
The sites have been in an unstable state for quite a while mostly
because neither we (OSL) nor Sun/Oracle had time to fix
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 12:35 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a
stability ( was Extensions and
templates site down )
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 17:11 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sunday, 2011-08-14 10:17:28 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
IIRC, these extensions are 3rd party, under a variety of licenses,
including some that are not open source
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
specifically to take this over, and then working with them to create
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
specifically to take this over, and then working with
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
specifically
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.comwrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:06 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on the OSUOSL server to a
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of left field]
Would members consider transferring ownership of the current repository
hosted on
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:18 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:06 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
big snip
Just hit the templates site and it's back, I would rather we
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drewd...@baseanswers.com wrote:
[from out of
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:18 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:06 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
big snip
Just hit the
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:42 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:18 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:06 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:37 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew
On 12/07/2011 Simon Phipps wrote:
TDF are just about to launch a full version of their extensions
templates system and they would be perfectly happy for AOOo to redirect the
URL that OpenOffice.org is using to access the repository so that it uses
the system TDF are hosting for LibreOffice.
On 12/07/2011 Rob Weir wrote:
1) The new extensions.openoffice.org site hosts no code or binaries.
It is simply a directory of 3rd party extensions and links to outside
sites for the actual files.
This would really be suboptimal since the OpenOffice.org community
really expects to use the
Hi,
Am 13.07.2011 00:37, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to
find an
alternative repository and link to it from Apache's website. This is
something
that can wait though.
You might think different, when you was an actual user or
2011.07.11. 15:41 keltezéssel, TJ Frazier írta:
On 7/11/2011 07:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
The two sites works sporadically, needs four five web page refresh
to load:
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
To help OOo
On 11/07/2011 TJ Frazier wrote:
On 7/11/2011 07:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Yes, I posted some more details in this message a few weeks ago:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201106.mbox/browser
and I don't have further updates available. ...
Andrea Pescetti's
Can we make it a priority to migrate these two site to Apache? We
need volunteers to do this. Nothing happens by magic here. We need
volunteers to define the technical requirements and work with Apache
Infrastructure to make this happen. Hopefully we'd make some platform
and technology choices
I sent an email to supp...@osuosl.org last night and got a response in 30
minutes.
OSUOSL admin says:
Looks like varnish died on the machine and I just kicked it. The site(s)
should be back online now.
The sites have been in an unstable state for quite a while mostly
because neither we
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I sent an email to supp...@osuosl.org last night and got a response in 30
minutes.
OSUOSL admin says:
Looks like varnish died on the machine and I just kicked it. The site(s)
should be back online now.
The sites
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Another option that comes to mind:
3) Have OOo extensions hosted by a 3rd party website and we link to
that site. It is done that way essentially now with OSL. But I think
we'll want to be more explicit about such links
As it happens I'd already started exploring this one with the Document
Foundation Steering Committee, and Jomar Silva raised it on the TDF-Discuss
list. TDF are just about to launch a full version of their extensions
templates system and they would be perfectly happy for AOOo to redirect the
On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Another option that comes to mind:
3) Have OOo extensions hosted by a 3rd party website and we link to
that site. It is done that way essentially now with
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:43:10 +0100, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
wrote:
...
As it happens I'd already started exploring this one with the
Document
Is the intent to host all of the extensions currently at the OOo
site?
Or a subset? Or a different set?
They host only extensions
On Jul 12, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Another option that
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:43:10 +0100, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
...
As it happens I'd already started exploring this one with the Document
Is the intent to host all of the extensions currently at the OOo site?
Or a subset? Or a different set?
They
On 2011/6/12 19:38 Pedro Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to
find an
alternative repository and link to it from Apache's website. This is
something
that can wait though.
Can you please explain the 'not good enough'
Am 13.07.11 01:47, schrieb Jomar Silva:
On 2011/6/12 19:38 Pedro Giffunigiffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to
find an
alternative repository and link to it from Apache's website. This is
something
that can wait though.
Can you
On Jul 12, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 13.07.11 01:47, schrieb Jomar Silva:
On 2011/6/12 19:38 Pedro Giffunigiffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to
find an
alternative repository and link to it from Apache's
Am 13.07.11 03:21, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Jul 12, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 13.07.11 01:47, schrieb Jomar Silva:
On 2011/6/12 19:38 Pedro Giffunigiffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough. We will have to
find an
alternative
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Jomar Silva homem...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On 2011/6/12 19:38 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough.
We will have to find an alternative repository and
link to it from Apache's website. This is something
that can wait though.
Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
The two sites works sporadically, needs four five web page refresh to load:
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
To help OOo present users, needs to stabilize sites work.
Somebody knows what the cause of this problem.
On 7/11/2011 07:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Reizinger Zoltán wrote:
The two sites works sporadically, needs four five web page refresh to load:
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/
To help OOo present users, needs to stabilize sites work.
Somebody
52 matches
Mail list logo
