I just found this out, I don't know if it was announced or not but its news to
me.
The official license can be read here:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
The key bit is:
Please remember, your right to use Solaris acquired as a download is limited to
a trial of 90 days, un
There are no free patches for solaris 10
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Aidan Lawn wrote:
> I just found this out, I don't know if it was announced or not but its news
> to me.
> The official license can be read here:
>
> http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
>
> The key bit i
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:30:19AM -0300, Ignacio Marambio Cat?n wrote:
> There are no free patches for solaris 10
Nor for OpenSolaris releases (you have to follow the dev builds)
--
Dan.
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Aidan Lawn wrote:
> > I just found this out, I don't know if it was
, March 21, 2010 10:46:29 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:30:19AM -0300, Ignacio Marambio Cat?n wrote:
> There are no free patches for solaris 10
Nor for OpenSolaris releases (you have to follow the dev builds)
--
Dan.
>
> On Mon, Mar 22
On 03/22/10 04:19 PM, Aidan Lawn wrote:
I just found this out, I don't know if it was announced or not but its news to
me.
The official license can be read here:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
The key bit is:
Please remember, your right to use Solaris acquired as a down
I did not know opensolaris costs too, that is a shame.
Thanks for the feed back, I didn't know about the comp.unix thread but have
found it now.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@openso
To update my earlier post:
Opensolaris is free but it has no patches.
Well none until the next 6 month release (There was a paid for montly repo but
this is supposed to be discontinued).
To get security patches or any patches you need to be using the opensolaris dev
line.
There was talk of
FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support contract or for that matter
license it at all under X64/X86 unless you are using it on Sun Hardware. This
little ditty has just forced us to move are apache servers to Linux. ;{
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 22.03.2010 12:43, Mike DeMarco wrote:
FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support contract or for that matter
license it at all under X64/X86 unless you are using it on Sun Hardware. This
little ditty has just forced us to move are apache servers to Linux. ;{
So, the old "perpetual l
> > FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support contract or for that
> > matter license it at all under X64/X86 unless you are using it on Sun
> > Hardware. This little ditty has just forced us to move are apache servers
> > to Linux. ;{
>
> So, the old "perpetual license" I received, per
> This isn't the place to discuss Solaris 10 licensing. This topic has
> been discussed on comp.unix.solaris yesterday.
This is a fine place to discuss anything about solaris or opensolaris,
regardless of whether or not it's already been discussed elsewhere. You
can't expect people to know every
> FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support contract or for that
> matter license it at all under X64/X86 unless you are using it on Sun
> Hardware. This little ditty has just forced us to move are apache
> servers to Linux. ;{
That's not true. I don't know how many vendors do this, but I
> > > FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support contract or for
> that matter license it at all under X64/X86 unless you are using it on
> Sun Hardware. This little ditty has just forced us to move are apache
> servers to Linux. ;{
>
> This is more a PR disaster. Oracle needs to spell out
> > FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support
> contract or for that
> > matter license it at all under X64/X86 unless you
> are using it on Sun
> > Hardware. This little ditty has just forced us to
> move are apache
> > servers to Linux. ;{
>
> That's not true. I don't know how many vend
> I just found this out, I don't know if it was
> announced or not but its news to me.
> The official license can be read here:
>
> http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
The change itself and the way in which it has been communicated (or not,
rather) is cause for concern.
The b
> I will verify, this has come directly from our sun/oracle sales rep.
Did anybody ever say the Sun/Oracle sales reps are totally honest, totally
informed, and totally unbiased? ;-)
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.o
> > I just found this out, I don't know if it was
> > announced or not but its news to me.
> > The official license can be read here:
> >
> > http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
>
> The change itself and the way in which it has been communicated (or
> not, rather) is cause for co
> > > I just found this out, I don't know if it was
> > > announced or not but its news to me.
> > > The official license can be read here:
> > >
> > >
> http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
> >
> > The change itself and the way in which it has been
> communicated (or
> > not, rat
> > > > I just found this out, I don't know if it was
> > > > announced or not but its news to me.
> > > > The official license can be read here:
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/popup.jsp?info=17
> > >
> > > The change itself and the way in which it has
> been
> > communi
> FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support
> contract or for that matter license it at all under
> X64/X86 unless you are using it on Sun Hardware. This
> little ditty has just forced us to move are apache
> servers to Linux. ;{
I have been assured by Sun/Oracle sales reps that this announ
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:07:20AM -0700, Aidan Lawn wrote:
>
> I don't even think microsoft could come up with a better FUD
> campaign than what oracle is doing themselves to opensolaris.
Well, I think they're supplying the U. The F and the D are coming
from elsewhere, fairly or not, but all t
Edward,
This isn't the place to discuss Solaris 10 licensing. This topic has
been discussed on comp.unix.solaris yesterday.
This is a fine place to discuss anything about solaris or opensolaris,
regardless of whether or not it's already been discussed elsewhere. You
can't expect people
On 22.03.2010 16:02, Daniel Carosone wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:07:20AM -0700, Aidan Lawn wrote:
I don't even think microsoft could come up with a better FUD
campaign than what oracle is doing themselves to opensolaris.
Well, I think they're supplying the U. The F and the D are coming
You (Mike DeMarco) wrote:
> > FYI You can not buy a Solaris 10 software support
> > contract or for that matter license it at all under
> > X64/X86 unless you are using it on Sun Hardware. This
> > little ditty has just forced us to move are apache
> > servers to Linux. ;{
> I have been assured by
On 03/23/10 01:19 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Please don't snip attributions, it's rude.
This isn't the place to discuss Solaris 10 licensing. This topic has
been discussed on comp.unix.solaris yesterday.
This is a fine place to discuss anything about solaris or opensolaris,
regardless
Regardless of accuracy or Uncertainty, a discussion about whether one
can buy something or from which vendors is irrelevant if one is not
looking to purchase.
Those of us looking to use free and open source systems, for whatever
reason and purpose, are interested in different questions than the o
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
> Again, as in my other posts in this thread, it's false.
>
> Yes, you can buy solaris for x86 hardware. I know because I buy it with
> Dell servers.
>
> It is possible for them to ship solaris with a different license via the
> website,
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 08:52 +0900, Stephen Bunn wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
> wrote:
> Again, as in my other posts in this thread, it's false.
>
> Yes, you can buy solaris for x86 hardware. I know because I
> buy it with
>
just got this in from Sun Sales rep.
Oracle Hardware Service Changes
Support Options
I. Systems
Premier Support for Systems
Covers system hardware, OS and virtualization software
One level of Service
7/24 wi
[...]
> 8% of customer’s net system price
> There will only be one price list –
> Hardware Price List
> Service pricing is based on hardware
> price
[...]
Well..._that_ destroys support for the home user. I mean, am I really
going to spend 8% * the $12000 or so that my Sun Blade 2000 (
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 07:54 -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> [...]
> > 8% of customer’s net system price
> > There will only be one price list –
> > Hardware Price List
> > Service pricing is based on hardware
> > price
> [...]
>
> Well..._that_ destroys support for the home user.
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 04:46 -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote:
> just got this in from Sun Sales rep.
>
[snip the royal arse fsck'ing by Oracle]
> VI. Service Portfolio Details:
>http://www.oracle.com/us/support/systems/operating-
>systems/index.html
>http://www.oracle.com/us/supp
> 2) Solaris 10 license are changed such that you can no longer use for
more than 90 days evaluation w/o "Entitlement". Again, w/o any advance
notice.
> 3) New Entitlements are now only available with purchase of SPARC
hardware.
I had a look at the licensing information that there is a link to on
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 15:30 -0700, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> > 2) Solaris 10 license are changed such that you can no longer use for
> more than 90 days evaluation w/o "Entitlement". Again, w/o any advance
> notice.
>
> > 3) New Entitlements are now only available with purchase of SPARC
> hardwar
> Suggest you read a little more thoroughly:
> "In order to use the Solaris operating system for perpetual commercial
use, each system running Solaris must be expressly licensed to do so. An
Entitlement Document comprises such license and is delivered to you
either with a new Sun system or from Su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24.03.2010 00:57, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> Since this is an OpenSolaris board, why are you bringing up FreeBSD? You
> can't get official commercial support for FreeBSD any more than you can for
> Fedora or for Arch Linux, since all three are free
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 01:48 +0100, Svein Skogen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 24.03.2010 00:57, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> > Since this is an OpenSolaris board, why are you bringing up FreeBSD? You
> > can't get official commercial support for FreeBSD any more th
Hi Ken,
Here's a post by your Doppelgänger:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/SunSolve/How+Entitlement+Works?focusedCommentId=199106721#comment-199106721
> I can't seem to purchase a support contract. The only page that even lists
> the ability to purchase it is broken (see dpfloyd's comment), and I
And the forum's are now apparently now programmed to censor comments, although
they don't even have basic functionality like displaying boldface. "I can" and
"bugger" got turned into asterisks.
Brilliant.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
> And the forum's are now apparently now programmed to
> censor comments, although they don't even have basic
> functionality like displaying boldface. "I can" and
> "bu_gg_er" got turned into asterisks.
>
> Brilliant.
That's not new, it's been censoring letter sequences that _might_
correspond t
On 2010年03月24日 12:40, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
And the forum's are now apparently now programmed to
censor comments, although they don't even have basic
functionality like displaying boldface. "I can" and
"bu_gg_er" got turned into asterisks.
Brilliant.
That's not new, it's been censori
Haulyn Jason wrote:
Many things changed, we must face to these, but, can anybody tell me,
how can we still believe oracle will keep opensolaris as now? Who can
make sure opensolaris will not change it's own way?
is it the time to migrate from sun(now as oracle/sun) productions to
linux, alt
Erik,
Bottom line: it's very premature to bail right now. That's a huge
thing to do, given that what is said today may not be the reality
tomorrow. I'm not saying sit on your hands and do nothing, but
certainly jumping ship at the first sign of trouble is equally foolish.
What you say is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24.03.2010 11:13, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Haulyn Jason wrote:
>>
>> Many things changed, we must face to these, but, can anybody tell me,
>> how can we still believe oracle will keep opensolaris as now? Who can
>> make sure opensolaris will not chan
Sean Sprague wrote:
> What you say is absolutely correct; and OpenSolaris users should read it
> at face value. Oracle now has at its command the best set of
> developers/sustainers/supporters that exist, IMO; and unless Oracle is
> infinitely short-sighted, then OpenSolaris will and must have
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike DeMarco wrote:
> I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
>
> Why are you guys so quiet?
Because most of the Sun/Oracle people here are engineers and have
absolutely no idea what's happening in the world of issuing licenses
and selling support contracts - at
Mike,
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
gagging order might be present.
Regards... Sean.
___
opensolaris-dis
>Mike,
>
>> I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
>>
>> Why are you guys so quiet?
>>
>
>Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
>gagging order might be present.
This is just too funny.
Casper
__
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 15:44 +0100, casper@sun.com wrote:
> >Mike,
> >
> >> I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
> >>
> >> Why are you guys so quiet?
> >>
> >
> >Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
> >gagging order might be
Mark,
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 15:44 +0100, casper@sun.com wrote:
Mike,
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
gagging order might be pres
This being funny how?
I would guess that some of the people on this list are using the
OpenSolaris as a testbed for Solaris Next, to prospect options for
their coming solutions for their commercial products.
For some the possibility that only Sun HW is supported in the
commercial product might be
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 07:22:45AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Mike DeMarco wrote:
> > I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
> >
> > Why are you guys so quiet?
>
> Because most of the Sun/Oracle people here are engineers and have
> absolutely no idea what'
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 03:13 -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Haulyn Jason wrote:
> >
> > Many things changed, we must face to these, but, can anybody tell me,
> > how can we still believe oracle will keep opensolaris as now? Who can
> > make sure opensolaris will not change it's own way?
> >
> > i
kgund...@teamcool.net said:
> . . .
> A - DR - At this point Oracle is very focused on places where they can make
> revenue and margin. Unfortunately for us, we have not seen a good uptake on
> those standalone subscriptions. Has seen more emails on the topic than the
> total number of systems so
There is more information here:
http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or_Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> There is more information here:
>
> http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
> _Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
Presuming it to be accurate, there are a couple of considerations
that approach misses:
* some of today's home/educational/small business have influence
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2010 12:14, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> There is more information here:
>>
>> http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
>> _Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
>
> Presuming it to be accurate, there are a couple of
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 21:10 -0700, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
> There is more information here:
>
> http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or_Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
...snip
Oracle (ORCL) has adopted what amounts to an "all or nothing" hardware
support policy
On 24 Mar 2010, at 14:22, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> add in another 80,000 and it's even more overwhelmingly impossible, especially
> as we're just barely starting to learn how to find information on
> Oracle's network.
Not to mention that there are still large parts of Sun outside the US that
h
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 04:14 -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > There is more information here:
> >
> > http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
> > _Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
>
> Presuming it to be accurate, there are a couple of considerations
> that appro
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 12:28 +0100, Svein Skogen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26.03.2010 12:14, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> >> There is more information here:
> >>
> >> http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
> >> _Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 04:14 -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > > There is more information here:
> > >
> > > http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
> > > _Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
> >
> > Presuming
Yes, there's nothing necessarily wrong with a unified support policy in itself.
But Oracle has also adopted the policy of not allowing users the option of
paying a (significantly lower) fee to get updates without getting support. This
seem to be bad business, not to mention open hostility to use
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 14:53 -0300, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ken Gunderson
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 04:14 -0700, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> > > There is more information here:
> > >
> > > http://www.cio.com/arti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2010 19:27, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> Having familiarity with Linux, *BSD, and HP-UX over the years, and
> Open/Solaris more recently, my take is that Open/Solaris IS
> technologically superior. I have no experience with AIX so cannot
> comment.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Svein Skogen wrote:
> On 26.03.2010 19:27, Ken Gunderson wrote:
>> Having familiarity with Linux, *BSD, and HP-UX over the years, and
>> Open/Solaris more recently, my take is that Open/Solaris IS
>> technologically superior. I have no experience with AIX so canno
On 03/26/10 05:10 PM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
There is more information here:
http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or_Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
Bringing this back a little closer to topicality, there one feature
relating to OpenSolaris missing from that
> There is more information here:
>
> http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
> _Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234
Is the hardware OEM's that supply the chips, controllers etc supporting
Oracle's support strategy?
---Bob
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
The hardware components used within a given system would not have to have the
same policy when the end product machine is used in registry.
This page is © Copyright 2001-2010 helpwithpcs.com
An example of OEM hardware would be: A hardware company that manufactures one
type of circuit board (such
Have these policies already gone into place, because I am still (crossing
fingers) getting security updates on my Solaris 10 box with no agreement. I
just got a new one today. Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
Visualisation? In the DataCenter?
I guess, you're talking about "Virtualization", right?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ian Collins
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Someone's overlooked the whole visualisation thing. What's one of
OpenSolaris's bit selling points? Visualisati
I would have to guess no not from the current manufacturer. Maybe possible from
someone else in the net framework if what your doing is important enough ??
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-disc
On 03/28/10 07:15 AM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
Visualisation? In the DataCenter?
I guess, you're talking about "Virtualization", right?
Right, trust me to copy and paste a typo!
--
Ian.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opens
Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
Personally I'm an open source advocate so any software business model
that is closed will have to try hard to convince me that it's better
than all the community can provide in testing, bug reporting, free
marketing, free support, etc.
You might be an advocate, but have
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 10:35 -0700, B wrote:
> Have these policies already gone into place, because I am still (crossing
> fingers) getting security updates on my Solaris 10 box with no agreement. I
> just got a new one today. Thanks!
I just took another look at it - the download page has been u
Good luck to us all!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I almost built my infrastructure on OpenSolaris and Solaris but am glad I
decided to opt for FreeBSD and OpenBSD instead.
There are way too many problems with OpenSolaris anymore that it wasn't
reliable. Now throw in the 90 day evaluation and then buy costly support is
icing on the cake.
It
bsd wrote:
> I almost built my infrastructure on OpenSolaris and Solaris but am glad I
> decided to opt for FreeBSD and OpenBSD instead.
Solaris 10 is not "open" and never was. Solaris 10 is from January 2005 and
closed source. OpenSolaris is from Jnue 14th 2005.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 15:52 -0700, bsd wrote:
> I almost built my infrastructure on OpenSolaris and Solaris but am glad I
> decided to opt for FreeBSD and OpenBSD instead.
>
> There are way too many problems with OpenSolaris anymore that it wasn't
> reliable. Now throw in the 90 day evaluation
>
> --
> Ken Gunderson
I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
your email removed permanently.
This is unacceptable.
As someone that recently bought and installed Microsoft Windows Ultimate 7
64-bit edition I would rather look at the cost of a vastly superior
p
> I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
your email removed permanently.
> This is unacceptable.
> speaking as a businessman I certianly [sic] do.
> Quite franky [sic], on these public mail lists, you will use correct english
> [sic] or
at least acceptable lang
On 03/28/10 10:51 PM, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
your email removed permanently.
This is unacceptable.
speaking as a businessman I certianly [sic] do.
Quite franky [sic], on these public mail
> These forums aren't censored for content, just for fowl language, we try to
> keep it civil here. I agree with Dennis Clarks warning.
Yes, they are censored for foul language. This is how the post that is
provoking the outrage appears if you view it in the Forums:
> let's not dis Open/Solari
On 03/29/10 01:07 AM, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
These forums aren't censored for content, just for fowl language, we try to
keep it civil here. I agree with Dennis Clarks warning.
Yes, they are censored for foul language. This is how the post that is
provoking the outrage appears if you v
>> These forums aren't censored for content, just for fowl language, we try
>> to keep it civil here. I agree with Dennis Clarks warning.
>
> Yes, they are censored for foul language. This is how the post that is
> provoking the outrage appears if you view it in the Forums:
I have had quite enou
OpenSolaris has some nice technologies, but with FreeBSD you can run zfs. With
the 8.0 release you can run vimage which is essentially Solaris Zones, while
FreeBSD has had jails for years and recently upgraded jails to v2. Crossbow is
really the only feature not in FreeBSD that I'd like to hav
On 03/29/10 02:06 AM, bsd wrote:
OpenSolaris has some nice technologies, but with FreeBSD you can run zfs. With
the 8.0 release you can run vimage which is essentially Solaris Zones, while
FreeBSD has had jails for years and recently upgraded jails to v2. Crossbow is
really the only feature
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Ken Gunderson
>
> I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
> your email removed permanently.
>
> This is unacceptable.
>
> As someone that recently bought and installed Microsoft Windows Ultimate 7
> 64-bit edition I would rather look at t
bsd wrote:
> OpenSolaris has some nice technologies, but with FreeBSD you can run zfs.
This is an incorrect claim, Opensolaris runs zfs. Please try to avoid
missleading claims.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> > Ken Gunderson
>>
>> I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
>> your email removed permanently.
>>
>> This is unacceptable.
>>
>> As someone that recently bought and installed Microsoft Windows Ultimate
>> 7
>> 64-bit edition I would ra
On 29.03.2010 11:52, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> bsd wrote:
>
>> OpenSolaris has some nice technologies, but with FreeBSD you can run zfs.
>
> This is an incorrect claim, Opensolaris runs zfs. Please try to avoid
> missleading claims.
I suppose what he meant was "FreeBSD too has zfs" (but an olde
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
> On 29.03.2010 11:52, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > bsd wrote:
> >
> >> OpenSolaris has some nice technologies, but with FreeBSD you can run zfs.
> >
> > This is an incorrect claim, Opensolaris runs zfs. Please try to avoid
> > missleading claims.
>
> I suppose what he
Svein Skogen wrote:
> On 29.03.2010 11:52, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > bsd wrote:
> >
> >> OpenSolaris has some nice technologies, but with FreeBSD you can run zfs.
> >
> > This is an incorrect claim, Opensolaris runs zfs. Please try to avoid
> > missleading claims.
>
> I suppose what he meant
On 29/03/2010 06:07, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
Given that we presently have (1), it is perverse to hold to (2). Why should
people go out of their way to be civil, when they know they will get censored?
We already have (2) as well. It's embodied in the OpenSolaris Community
Code of Conduct:
<
The routines may be working properly on the Jive Forum, but they are
not running at all on the email list.
I agree with Paul and Dennis. Keep it civil and professional or go
find someplace else to "participate".
fpsm
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
>> These forums aren'
As for this whole thread of discussion, the point of Oracle Solaris 10 being
non-free seems like a trolling event.
Oracle Solaris 10 10/09 (u8) is currently FREE to download. From a business
point of view, if Oracle really pulled the plug on the downloads - what does
that matter to us?!? I'd hop
Hi,
I don't understand why at the actual forums of Solaris 10 OS, I did not find
any complaints about Solaris 10 OS not being free anymore, but here at
OpenSolaris forums that really pertains only to OpenSolaris OS is full of
complaints about Solaris 10.
I thinks this is a more appropriate p
So, I'm sorry if I'm beating a dead horse, but has anyone asked/
answered the question of getting support and patches running Solaris
10 on ESX on non-Sun hardware? I've got a semi-ranty email out to my
Sun reps but haven't heard anything back yet.
Thanks in advance, and again, my apologies
Most of us that run OpenSolaris rely on Solaris 10 also. We live our day to day
on Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris. As far as I am concerned they go hand in hand
and a major event affecting one of them has ramifications on both. The
discussions that go on on this list are not 100% OpenSolaris but are
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
