- Original Message -
From: Jon Hope
Subject: Re: OT OT OT
I'm afraid I am of the opinion that they got their just
deserts. They alone
decided on the course of action that cost them their lives.
So, you don't believe that people react based on past experience
I take it?
William Robb
Hi Geordie,
M is for manual flash, which means you get full output, so you have to
expose via the old guide number method. Blue is for auto exposure with
a shorter range so that you can stop down more, and red is farther
(better for bounce) but you have to use a wider aperture. If I remember
Hi Pentaxians,
A few photos I took Veteran's Day weekend at Newport,
Central Oregon coast. The listmembers from the PNW will
know where it is.
They let me use the tripod in the aquarium, and they are
very accomodating to photographers.
The photos might not be the greatest, but we had a lot of
At 16:22 2/12/01, you wrote:
I'm afraid I am of the opinion that they got their just
deserts. They alone
decided on the course of action that cost them their lives.
So, you don't believe that people react based on past experience
I take it?
Hi William
Of course people react according to
Has Pentax made a digital camera which takes 35mm camera lenses, or are they
all point and shoot?
Rob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Well, there is a prototype that they have shown. It was about as top end as
you could get. For whatever reason, and there have been many metioned on
this list, they have put it aside. The current skinny is they will have a
lower spec one out by the middle of 2002. But so far all we have seen is
pentax-discuss-digest at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Mike, she never talked to anyone. More urban rumors...She died on
impact...She was ~not~ alive as people tried to get her out...driver, Dodi
and Di, all dead.
Mafud,
It was widely reported at the time (CNN, London Times, CBS) that
Well, I always figured it was because they didn't want pictures taken of
that blacked out limo. Certainly no one was going to get a shot of anyone in
the car. But, maybe they just didn't want anyone to follow them to where
they were going. If that was it, they succeeded brilliantly. All the furor
In a message dated 12/2/01 2:26:23 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why was she in that particular situation?
She was much more concerned with her appearance than she was with her
personal safety, thus, she eschewed wearing that nasty seat belt which might
wrinkle her
Hi,
it at least has some vague connection to photography, via the
paparazzi. However, this particular argument has orbitted at least
twice before and the pass contains nothing new, so perhaps anybody
who's interested in it could refer back to the archives rather than
raking over the coals again.
Sunday, December 02, 2001, 2:03:22 AM, Richard wrote:
RS Artur,
RS I think it is a problem if the camera shoots at, say, 1/30th, because at
RS that speed the ambient light will affect the final photo, almost regardless
RS of what aperture I set. It's quite possible to have a situation
Saturday, December 01, 2001, 7:38:38 PM, Frits wrote:
FJW Scanning the same image and taking the average of those scans cancels out
FJW the noise. The noise is random, the picture not, so if you do say 16 scans
[...]
FJW I am sure they could build this in a lab as well, but it obviously slows
FJW
Hi all,
Today, I went to downtown and touched the MZ-L. The
following is my impressions;
The body is almost the same as MZ-7. The PENTAX emblem is
different; 7's is printed, L's is carved.
DOF preview is added.
The minimum shutter is upgraded to 1/4000.
X-synch is also upgraded to 1/125.
Hi, Frantisek,
I really can't remember who started this thread, with his post about photographing an
arrest! Seems the thread has evolved (devolved?) into a who killed Lady Di thing.
Anyway, I should add here that I was commenting on that particular situation.
If a PJ (or anyone else) actually
At 21:03 2/12/01, you wrote:
Hi Bob
Um, I think this is getting offensive...
In which case I apologise to any and all that think it so. No more on this
matter from me.
Erm, if I can't use cheers, do you have a reasonable replacement? :-)
Jon
Relax! Take life as it comes, you can't chase
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
Dave, any bookstore should be able to get it for you. I got my current copy
from a local camera store.
It is called:
Kodak Pocket Photoguide. fourth edition. 2001.
Publication AR-21.
ISBN 0-07985-807-9
$14.95 US
$21.95 Can
Published under license by
Those of you that seemed to be so concerned about the color of your camera
bodies may want to consider switching to Hasselblad. The back cover of the
December issue of Shutterbug shows Hassies now available in green, blue, red
or yellow.
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Jon Hope wrote:
Erm, if I can't use cheers, do you have a reasonable replacement? :-)
Use boomshanka instead. It means may the seed of your loins have fruit
in the belly of your woman.
dave bummer
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Sat, 01 Dec 2001 09:55:25 -0600, you wrote:
Of course, 1/60th sucks as a flash sync speed - 1/100th is bad enough.
Flash sync at 1/60 is inadequate for people in motion. Here's an
example of why I try to avoid slow sync speeds:
http://www.photolin.com/C-Image014.jpg
This shot used
I like Cheers. Different greetings and closings give color to the list. It
seemed an unfortunate placement after your last sentence. Please continue
with it as you desire.
Some folks do indeed die due to stupidity. I enjoy reading the Darwin
Awards. Some folks die victims to the complicity of
Mafud wrote:
What the Paparzzi did (or not) had nothing to do with her death. She died
only because she hit the back of the front seat at 85mph.
I do a lot of industrial accident investigation, and have extensive
training, and I'm pretty good at it. No decent accident investigation
team in our
In a message dated 12/2/01 9:03:45 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the tip! I picked up a copy in Chapters yesterday. It's a nice
little book.
Hey Wendy!
What size is the book now? Before it was this tiny 3 x 4.5 thing that
slipped into any crack, or
C'mon, now pdml'ers, one opinion on macros? Do we only talk about digital,
gruesome deaths, taxes, etc. anymore?
Sheesh.
dave
p.s., Thanks Paul.
Paul Said:
Another sleeper you might watch for is a Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 Macro.
You
want the older version that goes to 1:2 as is, and
Hi Dave ...
The Pentax A 100/2.8 is a real jewel ... a joy to use, remarkably sharp,
very nice bokeh based on a couple of tests. A little spendy, perhaps,
when compared to the off-brands and slower, more plastic lenses, but,
IMHO, worth every penny. Others may be satisfactory, but I've no
In a message dated 12/2/01 9:32:24 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Use boomshanka instead. It means may the seed of your loins have fruit
in the belly of your woman.
dave bummer
That's not what ~I~ heard. My understanding was boomshanka meant:
May the fleas from a
Yah, sure, blame me. g
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
Dave, any bookstore should be able to get it for you. I got my current
copy
from a local camera
In a message dated 12/2/01 9:52:28 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This shot used flash sync of 1/60. Note the static objects are fine,
but the moving prople are blurred. And they just happened to move a
bit as I tripped the shutter. The flash was bounced off the
In a message dated 12/2/01 10:16:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Some folks do indeed die due to stupidity.
JFK ordering the bubble top to be removed being one such act.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
I looked at a red one at the Photo Expo. It was
beautiful! If only I had the money, I would have
bought one by now...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Bill Owens
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 07:41 AM 12/2/2001 -0800, Dave Weiss wrote:
C'mon, now pdml'ers, one opinion on macros? Do we only talk about digital,
gruesome deaths, taxes, etc. anymore?
I've been using the SMCP-FA 100mm f/2.8 Macro for about a year on both my
now departed LX bodies and my PZ-1p bodies. An excellent
In a message dated 12/2/01 10:21:40 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The impact is just the injury event,
__
And (along with no seatbelt) what killed her. Everything else is part of the
investigation. You'r talking of the extenuating
Sorry Bob
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT OT OT
You're wanting to infer that the people chasing the car were
at fault.
Mafud, I am inferring nothing. As I said in my original post on
the subject. everyone involved in that incident made bad
choices.
Hey gang,
I'm starting to think about getting a Pentax 300 /4 or /4.5 prime
soon and wanted to get some advice on one subject:
How is the feel/control of the manual focus mechanism on an
autofocus lens?
See, I'm currently using an LX, but I can foresee the day when I move
'down' to
On Saturday, December 1, 2001, at 01:54 AM, Chris Brogden wrote:
You forgot your camera and there is a function you could shoot but you
only have access to a 283 with a broken sensor and a K1000, meaning
raw manual flash shooting if you hope to get any photos at all. And
since the 283 does
On Saturday, December 1, 2001, at 04:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I repeat the question: how would ~you~ handle the situation I
proposed?
What's the formula to get a properly exposed shot with a broken 283
and a
K1000, subject distance 11.5 feet?
The formula is get out my Sekonic
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:49:46 EST, mafud wrote:
Slow flash sync ~always~ calls for panning with the moving object, releasing
the shutter in the process, meanwhile blurring the background.
Panning helps with slow flash sync, if one judges the speed and
direction correctly, just as you say above,
William Kane wrote:
How is the feel/control of the manual focus mechanism on an
autofocus lens?
The manual focus feel in the F* 300 mm. 4.5 is almost as good as the one
in traditional manual focus lenses. The ruberised focusing ring is wide
enough for anyone's needs, and it works
What great photos! I was on the Oregon coast in September visiting my
daughter, who lives in Portland. I totally missed this. It will be on the
top of my list of places to see the next time I go there (in January). Your
ZX-5 did a great job. I'll be using my ZX-50 when I go and hopefully
you not only kill
much more on the planet with exhalations and gas for your big SUV, but you
will certainly kill ANY pedestrian or cyclist you happen to bump into.
SUVs are mostly fatal to pedestrians - mostly children (who tend to
run into street more than the careful adults - even at just 20
Thanks Maciej,
I agree with you, the PUG is a useful learning tool.
My picture showed to me 2 lessons:
-As often happens, closer is better (the image is
around 25% of the original).
-Never discard an image, there can be something good
enough hidden (specially dangerous for digital and
'delete
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 07:41:09 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
C'mon, now pdml'ers, one opinion on macros? Do we only talk about digital,
gruesome deaths, taxes, etc. anymore?
I will sell a Vivitar 100/3.5 Macro in Pentax AF, less the lifesize
diopter, for a good price. It takes good photos, and is in
Thanks Bob, I am glad that you liked it.
Jaume
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just some mentions of photos that caught my eye and
have not been noted yet...
Jaume Lahuerta - The Tower and the (Ghost) Church -
Wonderful nighttime cloud
effects over the city and the tower keeps attracting
The formula is get out my Sekonic and check. I'd bet a
dozen
doughnuts that my exposure will be more accurate than yours,
unless you
remembered your tape measure.
Seriously, you'd go to a professional gig with no meter? Or
is that
broken too?
-Aaron
I carry a Wein flashmeter and a
I'm glad to here that. I have been contemplating buying the A 100
2.8, if I am ever lucky enough to find it. What should I expect to pay
for one in good condition?
Geoff
Date sent: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 07:48:07 -0800
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your film was all
fogged by airport x-rays, and your car was stolen and there was a
public transit strike? THEN what would you do with no background in
manual flash exposure calculation, tough
What are some of your favorite photography books? For example, favorite
book in categories such as these:
* essential camera bag reference
* historical / biographical
* inspirational
* field shooting technique
* darkroom technique
* photo technology (film, digital, other)
* (insert your
I think you need to be aware of what your subject is and how the overall
image brightness may deviate from and average 18% grey. If taking a
picture of a snow scene or perhaps a macro that fills your frame with a
pale coloured flower, you should increase exposure. Typically I use
aperture
Bob W. wrote:
One thing it doesn't do is advance in any way what was changing into a
potentially interested discussion about the recent French laws, which I
haven't seen discussed here. Whoever was ultimately responsible for the
car crash it doesn't change the fact that the supercharged
By the way, this is TOTALLY OT, but if you have young children, consider
pointing out to them that the famous man everybody's talking about on TV
died very young and was killed by smoking. George Harrison was a heavy
smoker all his life and suffered from several cancers all related to
smoking.
On Sunday, December 2, 2001, at 12:09 PM, Len Paris wrote:
I need to upgrade the flashmeter but haven't spent a
lot of time doing research on the latest models.
I have a Sekonic L-308b which I quite like. It's small, the readout
makes sense, the controls are well-placed, and it hasn't let
On Sunday, December 2, 2001, at 12:24 PM, Chris Brogden wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your film was all
fogged by airport x-rays, and your car was stolen and there was a
public transit strike? THEN what would you do
Nice pictures - and a nice coast. I'll have to vacation there sometime.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: harald_nancy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 2:51 AM
Subject: Photos of Newport, Oregon coast
| Hi Pentaxians,
| A few photos I took
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden
Subject: Re: flash stuff
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your
film was all
fogged by airport x-rays, and your car was stolen and there
was a
public transit strike? THEN what
Mike, please be a good little muffin now, will you?
By the way, George attributed his cancer in an interview to being
stupid and smoking a lot of cigarettes.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden
Subject: Re: flash stuff
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
But what if both of your TTL flashes broke down, and your
film was all
fogged by airport x-rays, and your car was stolen
I WOULD go home. To take their picture of course,and make friends.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: OT, and ridiculous...was: Re: flash stuff
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston
Subject: The New French Anti-Photography Law
snip the official cause of the accident was
determined to be drunk driving.
snip
This is totally an aside, but in my neck of the woods, if the
driver of an automobile has a measurable amount of
- Original Message -
From: Geoff Moes
Subject: Re: Which 100 mm Macro ?
I'm glad to here that. I have been contemplating buying the A
100
2.8, if I am ever lucky enough to find it. What should I
expect to pay
for one in good condition?
In my not so humble opinion, the A 100 f/2.8
- Original Message -
From: Michael Perham
Subject: 24 X 36 Digital Image Sensors
I was just browsing Mamiya's web site and noticed that amongst
the
numerous digital backs available for their 6X7 cameras, the
two most
popular size of image sensors are 72 X 96 and 24 X 36; the 35
mm
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: OT OT OT
Arguing extenuating or contributing circumstances only clouds
the issue of
HOW (why) SHE DIED: no seat belt.
The rest is merely idle gossip over the
In a message dated 12/2/01 11:45:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The formula is get out my Sekonic and check. I'd bet a dozen
doughnuts that my exposure will be more accurate than yours, unless you
remembered your tape measure.
Seriously, you'd go to a
Hi Bill,
I have the FA* 300/4.5, and use it quite extensively. I love the lens. I
am using it primarily on a pz1p and the autofocus operation is very good.
The manual focus is smooth and easy to operate. There is not the friction
that you will get when using a real MF lens, in other words it
In a message dated 12/2/01 11:46:30 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:49:46 EST, mafud wrote:
Slow flash sync ~always~ calls for panning with the moving object,
releasing
the shutter in the process, meanwhile blurring the background.
Panning
Nice thread!
What are some of your favorite photography books? For example, favorite
book in categories such as these:
* inspirational
Jeanloup Sieff '40 Years of Photography'***
Arnold newman 'One mind's Eye'
Jane Brown 'Faces'*
* field shooting technique
John Garrett
In a message dated 12/2/01 1:19:34 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a good opportunity to talk to your kids yet again about smoking.
Right on Mike!
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
I bought my copy in 1991 at Southerland Photo in Huntsville, Alabama.
Doug
At 10:03 PM -050012/1/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, or at least typed:
I'm wondering when the guide went on sale. Through 1997, it was a part of the
literature my KODAK freely dealer passed out?
Mafud
--
Douglas
In a message dated 12/2/01 2:03:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The official investigation by the French government concluded that his life
was saved by the passenger-side airbag.
--Mike
And because he was held stationary by his seat belt.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 12/2/01 4:02:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very thoughtful comments, Bob.
In regard to your last paragraph, the fact such a law would clearly violate
the constitutional freedom of the press. And, because the press has lots of
money to fight it.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The PUG has a synchronicity theme a couple of times a year. I don't
see the point to it, in and of itself, although the photos are usually
of interest. If you really want to see what the world looks like at a
given time, here's one option:
Hi everybody,
I'm back home after a two-days-and-a-half weekend spent in the
island of Procida, the smallest and the less known of the
islands near Naples.
I took with me an LX and the MX, in which I had decided to mount
the SC-21 screen (from the LX) to have a bit of brightness more.
Lenses
Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Party is Over by Gianfranco Irlanda, Italy
http://pug.komkon.org/01dec/incomm.html
Gianfranco i think you have the best hit rate of pics that i
like on the
PUG.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the kind words. I hope to perform always this way...
Gianfranco
Buy
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'The Party is Over'
Gianfranco Irlanda
Another superb study. Shots like this either work or they
don't, and this
one most definitely does! Excellent relationship between the
hands. Don't
need to see the faces. The cups and things on the table nice
and soft -
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
The equipment performed well, as ever, apart for the usual
strange behaviour of that particular LX coupled with my older
AF280T: the flash refused regularly to fire, so I forgot about
it.
Welcome home. Remember, the LX in TTL mode won't fire the flash unless
Patrice Karine LACOUTURE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... why not just letting people shoot anything when they
want? What does
the synchronicity PUG have that the regular PUGs (without
theme) don't have?
It helps photographers seek for photographic subjects where
they usually
don't see them...
Hi, I am having an ongoing issue with my Epson C80 printer, and
am hoping that perhaps someone can help me determine the
problem.
Please see:
http://www.accesscomm.ca/users/wrobb/Artifact1.jpg
The part circled in red is the problem.
Thanks
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
I've got the FA 100/2.8 (EX from KEH) and it is my most freq. used lens.
The other serious contender was the Tamron SP 90/2.8. From the samples
photos I've seen (and my own with the FA 100/2.8) the two are very close in
quality. The Tamron may have slight edge as far as bokeh is concerned.
On 2 Dec 2001 at 15:37, Geoff Moes wrote:
I have never seen one for sale, so I am trying to gage what price I
should pay, if I luck out. Can any one tell me what they have payed
or what price they have seen it listed at?
Hi Geoff,
As a guide, I kept the following details from recent eBay
Hi Paul,
I know it... :(
BTW, the LX in object is the worst looking one I have. I had
even put on it the finder that once fell on a concrete floor
(with another LX and winder mounted...), so it's probably a
problem of contact failure between the body and the hotshoe
(holding the camera
Maciej Marchlewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Party is Over by Gianfranco Irlanda
I don't know exactly why but I love this photo. I think that
I'm a
blackwhite man so you've gained the first point here but the
photo has much
more in it. It carries the story, made me make up the plot to
Bob W. wrote:
newly signed (but with his 1971 signature) 1st edition vbg of
Vietnam, Inc. by Philip Jones Griffiths. (thanks for giving me
the opportunity to drop that one into the conversation :o))
Okay, Walkden, I'm jealous. Cut it out now.
--Mike
g
-
This message is from the
Just a guess. When was the last time you ran it through a head cleaning
exercise?
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 4:55 PM
Subject: OT: Inkjet problem
Hi, I am having an ongoing
Matjaz Osojnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
my top three PUG picks this month are as follows:
(...)
The Party is Over by Gianfranco Irlanda. Great photo. Yes,
as Cotty
wrote, the hands tell the story perfectly, especially the
relation among
woman's hands, caught in the moment of
I would try cleaning the heads with the software Epson provides, but I
don't know if that's going to do it. Usually, head cleaning resolves a
clogged nozzle. This looks like a dripping nozzle. Do a clean, then run
another test, then repeat the procedure if necessary. My Epson 1200
seemed to
Bob W. wrote:
If you apply the same reasoning to print journalism as you've applied to
photographic journalism
Whoa, whoa, WHO there Hoss! I'm not arguing in FAVOR of the French law.
I'm just trying to interpret how it might have held some sort of
hard-to-detect appeal to otherwise
Dan;
Why the negative comment at the end? Is the FA a bit cheap feeling or is it
the optical quality that is bothering you?
Might you know any difference between the various tamron offerings? Does
anyone know what the diffence between the FA 90f2.8 and f2.5 are? It looks
like the newer
Wow, that must be one fast baby and some real fast adults too! Looks
more like 1/6 second to me than 1/60. Actually, I kind of like the
effect, and I'm note sure I'd like the photo any better if it were
static. But, I'll admit I'm weird that way.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
Cotty wrote:
Jane Brown 'Faces'*
I thought it was Jane BOWN, no?
Whatever, if it's the book I'm thinking of, I liked that one too. I'm sorry
I don't own it.
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Doesn't the MZ-5 have a setting on the shutter speed dial for 1/100?
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: HELP: my MZ-5 thinks 1/60th is a great flash sync
Another potential sleeper is the Kiron 105mm f2.8 macro. I bought mine for
$140 a few years ago and I have absolutely no quibbles about it's
quality. Goes to 1:1 without accessories.
I think that the A 100 f2.8 macro would be ideal, but the two I've seen on
ebay went in the neighborhood of
This is not unusual, it is in fact, common that different lenses and
camera combinations result in different exposures. Sometimes it's the
camera's shutter at certain speeds, and sometimes it's the lens'
particular certain aperture not being exact. The cumulative effect of
the shutter and
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: flash stuff
In a message dated 12/2/01 11:45:21 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The formula is get out my Sekonic and check. I'd bet a
Tom, about a year ago on eBay I picked up a used Kodak Caramate for
about $50 plus shipping.
Joe
Has anyone ever used a Slide Viewer/Projector? I have a Kodak carousel
projector but it's not what you want to use for previewing slides.
I see in BH's catalog, a Braun Novamat 330MAF
At 13:15 2-12-2001 -0500, you wrote:
Subject: Re: shooting holiday lights
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the tip! I picked up a copy in Chapters yesterday. It's a nice
little book.
Hey Wendy!
What size is the book now? Before it was this tiny 3 x 4.5 thing that
slipped into any
You'll get usable images and grain the size of soccer balls.
Bill Robb says pushing doesn't work. Others whom I respect as much as I
respect Bill says that pushing does work. The best recommendation I've
seen is: Fuji NHGII 800, shot at 2000 and processed with a 2-stop push.
This is supposed to
Please, tell me which rights and liberties have been lost?
Collin
I think Bush, the FBI Director and the Homeland Defense Minister-err,
Secretary, might have something to say about what and which of the freedoms
we Americans take pride in go next.
What with all the public freedoms they are
I use the Vivitars with no problems. My set has the electrical contacts and
work fine. However, they are too narrow to couple with the L series
teleconverters, so avoid them if you plan to use them with the TC's.
- MCC
At 10:48 AM 11/13/01 -0800, you wrote:
Hello all...
Does anyone have
I Have the A*300 f4. It's a nice lens but the minimum focusing distance is
just under 4 meters - a little too far for some uses (nothing like stalking
close to a subject - only to realize you are too close...) 300mm is not a
focal length I use a lot, and when I do I usually use a zoom. If
Just got back from the swap meet and picked up a few filters, a hot shoe for
my son, and an S1a body($30CDN). The only niggle is that the frame counter
does not reset, only goes as far as 20. Apart from that , it's is in pretty
good condition.
James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
I like the bridge shot. Haven't been to the coast in a long time,
especially the aquarium, after Keiko the whale moved out.
I have always wanted to get a VW camper.
Jim A.
From: harald_nancy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:51:23 -0800
To: [EMAIL
I am trying to use a 135mm/f2.8 manual focus lens on my MZ-S
It fits on ok and when turned on, all seems fine, and I can still use
the dial to set the shutter speed, however, I cannot use the light
meter as it is alway lit up on the bottom of the scale eg
+
--
-
--
-
--
-
---
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
-
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
