> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Exchange server
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 14:47, Ben Russo wrote:
> > If your exchange server is runn
> If it's not free,
> then I might as well buy Windows in place of buying this
> since it would be able to run all the windoze apps. (doesn't
> mean that I'll buy Windows!)
>
What a stupid logic. You don't seem to have understood what the idea behind
the GPL is all about, have you?
> I like Li
I've used evolution and it works with the connector to an exchange 2000
server. If I could I would use evolution and drop outlook period. Why use
outlook you say? Well... our NT 4.0 poc exchange 5.5 server requires it.
No IMAP support or anything. Sux but that's the way it goes. Crossover
Off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, August 21, 2003, 1:16:28 AM, Didier wrote:
> [Jason] called me an idiot.
You're right. He used the wrong word. He should have used "naive". We
don't really have any evidence as to your intelligence.
Ron.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, August 21, 2003, 1:56:51 AM, Didier wrote:
> software I would not buy for Linux because the initial spirit of Linux
> was to be an OPEN SOURCE system. This is MY CHOICE. I know this is not
> yours
That's fine. Very nice. I would rather see
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:16:28PM +0800, Didier Casse wrote:
[Snip]
> If you can't be nice to me, why should I be too you?
[Snip]
If my dog shits in the middle of tiliving he room should I do likewise? :)
Cheers,
--
Javier Gostling D.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscri
On 21 Aug 2003, John Rehmert wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:45, Didier Casse wrote:
>
> > > Excuse my french, but you're an idiot. It's attitudes like this that
> > > keep companies from releasing software for the Linux platform. Like it
> > > or not, there is a place for both free and pro
o not use MS Office cause it cranky. I use FREE LaTeX for
> > typsetting which Knuth donated FREELY, and my
> > own slidepro software for Presentations. As for the rest I've
> > more efficient substitutes. This is the real Philosophy you stupid ass.
>
> I'm happy you don&
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:45, Didier Casse wrote:
> Excuse my french, but you're an idiot. It's attitudes like this that
> keep companies from releasing software for the Linux platform. Like it
> or not, there is a place for both free and proprietary software (unless
> you're RMS). Never for
e MS Office cause it cranky. I use FREE LaTeX for
> typsetting which Knuth donated FREELY, and my
> own slidepro software for Presentations. As for the rest I've
> more efficient substitutes. This is the real Philosophy you stupid ass.
I'm happy you don't have to use Microsof
Thanks for the remark Bret. But he's the one who started it. Jason Dixon
can't disagree politely! At least Peter Kiem does. :-)
Didier
PhD student
Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS)
5 Research Link,
Singapore 117603
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://ssls.nus.
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 22:45, Didier Casse wrote:
>
> You're hooked to MS products and your plugin that you bought is another
> way of showing that you can't use real pure LINUX software and that you
> still really on those weak software.
Calm down guys. If you want to resort to name calling
> Excuse my french, but you're an idiot. It's attitudes like this that
> keep companies from releasing software for the Linux platform. Like it
> or not, there is a place for both free and proprietary software (unless
> you're RMS). Never forget, the GPL is all about "free as in speech, not
> as
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:14, Didier Casse wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Ben Russo wrote:
>
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way to connect to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
> >
> > To connect directly using MAPI you have to use Outlook,
> > and
> when it comes to Linux stuff. My idea of Linux is that it is free software
> developed by the community. Those who make me pay for Linux software
> should be trashed!
Well I sincerely hope YOUR idea of Linux dies and dies quickly. Linux is
about free speech and not free beer.
There is no reaso
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Ben Russo wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to connect to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
> >
> >
>
>
> To connect directly using MAPI you have to use Outlook,
> and you have to get "Codeweavers Crossover Office" to
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 14:47, Ben Russo wrote:
> If your exchange server is running "OWA" (Outlook web access)
> Then you can purchase a Ximian Connector license. Ximian
> Evolution with connector works well under most circumstances,
> but I find it to be a little slow
Brian wrote:
Is there a way to connect to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
To connect directly using MAPI you have to use Outlook,
and you have to get "Codeweavers Crossover Office" to do that.
This works very well, but does have the drawback that you are
not using "domain"
There sue is Brian,
Use Ximian Evolution and go to Ximian's site and purchase their
connector for Exchange. Here is the link
http://www.ximian.org/products/connector/
Good luck
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:39, Brian wrote:
> Is there a way to connect to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
--
Vince
Is there a way to connect to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hi,
I am planning to drop my exchange server - but I need to keep the outlook
clients.
Can anybody point me in the direction of some software and Howto's
Thanks
Kevin
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hi,
I am planning to
drop my exchange server - but I need to keep the outlook
clients.
Can anybody point me
in the direction of some software and Howto's
Thanks
Kevin
: Dropping exchange server - documentation required on
replacement running on RH7.2
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 16:06, Douglas Phillipson wrote:
> Try Bynari's Insight Server. www.bynari.com
>
> Doug P
>
>
> Kevin Passey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am planning to dro
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 16:06, Douglas Phillipson wrote:
> Try Bynari's Insight Server. www.bynari.com
>
> Doug P
>
>
> Kevin Passey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am planning to drop my exchange server - but I need to keep the
> > outlook clients.
>
Try Bynari's Insight Server. www.bynari.com
Doug P
Kevin Passey wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to drop my exchange server - but I need to keep the
outlook clients.
Can anybody point me in the direction of some software and Howto's
Thanks
Kevin
--
Douglas
Kevin Passey <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:47 AM said:
> I am planning to drop my exchange server - but I need to keep the
> outlook clients.
>
> Can anybody point me in the direction of some software and Howto's
Never done this, but this
Title: RE: Help: Linux Email Client for MS Exchange Server
Hi,
>-Original Message-
>From: Eduardo A. dela Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 10:17 PM
>To: RedHat List
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Help: Linux Email Client for MS Excha
e few workarounds to make it work but i know its not proper and
not appropriate as long term solution.
i tried visiting the site of ximian but to my surprise, they've just
offered a commercially licensed "Ximian Connector" to be able to
optimize connectivity with MS Exchange Server (so,
Sorry man I'm not paying for something I can figure out with the help of my
peers.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Kehres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux front end for exchange server
Dear
I've been trying to get this to work without a lot of success yet.
There are some docs here, http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html .
Craig
From: "Cowles, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
: "Jason Staudenmayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 12:34 AM
Subject: Linux front end for exchange server
> Has anyone done this yet? If so are there docs. I would like to move my
> Exchange server
> behind a Linux box. H
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Staudenmayer
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:25 AM
> Subject: RE: Linux front end for exchange server
>
>
> What setup do you use and how's it working so far?
> I'm having a hard time finding a plain explanation of
What setup do you use and how's it working so far?
I'm having a hard time finding a plain explanation of how this will
work. Right now I have sendmail running and it will get a mail but when
it sends it out the exchange server dumps it because the server name is
not known.
Exampl
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 12:48 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Linux front end for exchange server
OK I have gotten this far. qmail is installed at can send mail out no
problem. I have my internal DNS server set with the MX pointing to qmail
server. I have
lse is default unchanged.
Any ideas on what I'm missing??
TIA
-Original Message-
From: Mark Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Linux front end for exchange server
Jason,
I am doing this right now.
What
Title: RE: Linux front end for exchange server
Mark, I'd appreciate the documentation on this as well.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Parsons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Linux front end for exc
Jason,
I am doing this right now.
What I have is a qmail email server that accepts all messages. Scans
them for spam using spamassassin/razor and then forwards them to my
exchange server which has a virus scanning system on it. This was very
easy to do and setup.
The main resources I used were
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Staudenmayer
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:34 AM
> Subject: Linux front end for exchange server
>
>
> Has anyone done this yet? If so are there docs. I would like
> to move my Exchange server behind a Linux box. Having Lin
It sounds like you want to set up a sendmail 'gateway'. This should be
relatively easy to do. You make the sendmail box the outgoing SMTP server on
the Exchange server. On sendmail, you have everything sent back into the
Exchange box. Check out sendmail.org's docume
Has anyone done this yet? If so are there docs. I would like to move my
Exchange server
behind a Linux box. Having Linux scan for virus, tag spam and then "pass"
the mail to the
exchange server for delivery. The virus scanning isn't that important as the
exchange
server does scan
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Zelda Popovich wrote:
> Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3
> mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using
> SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange
> server. I have the
On 2002.06.04 08:17 David Christensen wrote:
> Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3
> mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using
> SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange
> server. I have the
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 20:03, Zelda Popovich wrote:
> Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3
> mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using
> SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange
> server.
Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3
mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using
SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange
server. I have the fetchmail to Exchange forwarding working, but how
can I get
Is this possible? I want to use fetchmail to download from several POP3
mail accounts, process it through procmail to separate the spam (using
SpamBouncer to be more specific), and then forward to an Exchange
server. I have the fetchmail to Exchange forwarding working, but how
can I get
> > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, John T. Douglass wrote:
> >
> > > If you exchange server is configured to only accept ntlm, there are
> > > not native mail readers under linux that I am aware of that support
> > > this protocol.
> >
> > I didn&#x
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, John T. Douglass wrote:
>
> > If you exchange server is configured to only accept ntlm, there are
> > not native mail readers under linux that I am aware of that support
> > this protocol.
>
> I d
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, John T. Douglass wrote:
> If you exchange server is configured to only accept ntlm, there are
> not native mail readers under linux that I am aware of that support
> this protocol.
I didn't know fetchmail supported NTLM. I suppose I learn something
vid
> >
Actually there can be something proprietary -- namely the
authentication. Exchange can be configure to use POP and IMAP however
many organizations do not do so due to their inherent clear text
nature. Instead they use NTLM which is a native microsoft authentication
(the one that the Outloo
exchange
> >
> IIRC, you CAN "pop" your email from an Exchange server... AFAIK,
> there is nothing that can use the proprietary M$ protocols though.
> John
Well... not for Linux no, but for Windows there is a couple of alternatives.
There might be something quite so
ot;pop" your email from an Exchange server... AFAIK,
there is nothing that can use the proprietary M$ protocols though.
John
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:34 PM
Subject: collecting email from exchange server
> I have a problem, I hope someone has an answer too.
>
> I have been successfully using Linux as my OS. The email server is MS
> exchange. Does anybody know of a Linux client which
I have a problem, I hope someone has an answer too.
I have been successfully using Linux as my OS. The email server is MS
exchange. Does anybody know of a Linux client which can retrieve mail
from exchange
david
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAI
1-May-98 Venkatesh. K wrote:
> We are using a RH 5.0 Server for picking up mail from our
> pop account and send mail to the outside world.
>
> We are also having a MS Exchange server for our internal
> use.
>
> I would like to use RH 5.0 server to relay mail to internet
>
We are using a RH 5.0 Server for picking up mail from our
pop account and send mail to the outside world.
We are also having a MS Exchange server for our internal
use.
I would like to use RH 5.0 server to relay mail to internet
from exchange server. Please let me know what needs to be done
Hi
I'd like to use Netscape (RH 5.0) and use MS Exchange Server.
Is it possible?
Best regards
Krzysztof I. Cabaj
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
Linux does nfs serving with busted file locking. You can easily get
messages inserted inside eachother in inboxes. However, if you have an
nfs server based on Sun or Network Appliance, then you are ok.
We have a Sun based NFS server exporting to several POP servers and a
couple of SMTP server
> On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Larry Lade wrote:
>
> > >One concern I do have with a Linux-based email system is the relative
> > >inability to do scanning for virii, trojan horses, etc... on the server.
Check out http://www.cyber.com Their Vfind software claims to be able to
scan your system for virii
> "Pat" == Pat Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pat> On 8 Apr 1998, James Youngman wrote:
>> Mail delivery to NFS-mounted volumes is a risky business and wisely
>> widely avoided.
Pat> just delivery or retrieval too??
Mainly delivery. The problem is that it's all too easy to h
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, William T Wilson wrote:
> On 8 Apr 1998, James Youngman wrote:
>
> > Mail delivery to NFS-mounted volumes is a risky business and wisely
> > widely avoided.
>
> That isn't true. There are ways to do this "correctly" and sendmail even
> gives some tips on how to configure it
On 8 Apr 1998, James Youngman wrote:
> Mainly delivery. The problem is that it's all too easy to have a
> locking problem with NFS and get a corrupted mailbox. If you have a
The safest solution is to set one system as the central mail hub. Have
the sendmails on all the other systems forward a
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
> Where? I'm looking through the 'Bat Book' and can't really find anything
> specific to NFS.
Perhaps I was exaggerating somewhat when I said it includes some "tips."
It does mention in the README file that comes with the M4 macros, that you
can use t
At 11:35 a 04/08/98 -0400, Mike Johnson wrote:
>>Is it really fair to call what you get from Microsoft "support"? I'd say
>>it's more like, "one company to get jerked around by while they promise
>>you a fix in the near future."
>
>Well, to get decent support out of Microsoft, you have to pay for
business and wisely
> widely avoided.
Besides, the exchange server is going to put your mail into MMF format and
Pine can't read that.
-Paul
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /
On 8 Apr 1998, James Youngman wrote:
> Mail delivery to NFS-mounted volumes is a risky business and wisely
> widely avoided.
That isn't true. There are ways to do this "correctly" and sendmail even
gives some tips on how to configure it in the documentation.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ
On 8 Apr 1998, James Youngman wrote:
> > "Pat" == Pat Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Pat> I'm willing to bet money that you could use nfs to mirror your
> Pat> mail directory (/var/spool/mail and their home directories if
> Pat> you have people wanting to telnet in and use pi
At 11:17 AM 4/8/98 -0400, you wrote:
>David Masterson wrote:
>>* one company to get support from
>
>Is it really fair to call what you get from Microsoft "support"? I'd say
>it's more like, "one company to get jerked around by while they promise
>you a fix in the near future."
Well, to get decent
g)
> >
> > Mail delivery to NFS-mounted volumes is a risky business and wisely
> > widely avoided.
>
> Besides, the exchange server is going to put your mail into MMF format and
> Pine can't read that.
>
Well i thought we were talking about setting up multiple l
On 8 Apr 1998, James Youngman wrote:
> Mainly delivery. The problem is that it's all too easy to have a
> locking problem with NFS and get a corrupted mailbox. If you have a
> one-file-per-message mailbox style, such as nnml (GNUS) or maildir
> (qmail), then the NFS locking is more reliable. T
On 8 Apr 1998, James Youngman wrote:
> > "Pat" == Pat Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Pat> I'm willing to bet money that you could use nfs to mirror your
> Pat> mail directory (/var/spool/mail and their home directories if
> Pat> you have people wanting to telnet in and use
David Masterson wrote:
>* one company to get support from
Is it really fair to call what you get from Microsoft "support"? I'd say
it's more like, "one company to get jerked around by while they promise you
a fix in the near future."
-- --
At 02:15 PM 4/8/98 +0200, you wrote:
>I conquered that using a set of restricted access Web pages. With newer
>mail clients, LDAP would also work.
As an aside, if you're already using Eudora as your clients, there's a
ph to ldap gateway that allows older versions of Eudora to act as if
it can do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 12:29 4/8/98 +0100, James Youngman wrote:
>You missed one; where you need a centrally-maintained address book for
>use by remote users.
I conquered that using a set of restricted access Web pages. With newer
mail clients, LDAP would also work.
Maintenance o
>>>>> "Steve" == Steve Curry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok we have some clients that want to put in an M$ Exchange server
> for internal company mail. The workstations are Win95 machines that
> are running Micro$oft Outlook as the client. I suggested a
> "Stephan" == Stephan Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephan> - Works with *any* pop (or imap if used) client versus
Stephan> proprietary clients for Exchange. Including free versions
Stephan> of Eudora, Netscape, and Pegasus.
Exchange will work with any POP3 client; I use fetchm
> "Pat" == Pat Hennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pat> I'm willing to bet money that you could use nfs to mirror your
Pat> mail directory (/var/spool/mail and their home directories if
Pat> you have people wanting to telnet in and use pine or something)
Mail delivery to NFS-mounted v
Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 1998 11:16 PM
To: StarrDust
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook
> I am just a newbie here on the RH list, so please excuse any bad manners
> of crashing into a conversation,
> but uh-h-h
I like Outlook Express, honestly. It is one of the best mail clients I
have seen (besides PINE :) ). Although Outlook Full just plain SUCKS!!
Bryan
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Greg Thomas wrote:
|
|> I am just a newbie here on the RH list, so please excuse any bad manners
|> of crashing int
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Derek Balling wrote:
..snip..
>
> Scalability: If your server workload on Sendmail is running too high, you
> can mirror the box over to another machine and load-balance your email
> simply by adding an MX record of equal priority.
>
Derek - how is this implemented in a pop
>One concern I do have with a Linux-based email system is the relative
>inability to do scanning for virii, trojan horses, etc... on the server.
>While server-based scanning is not a replacement for protection at the
>desktop, many companies now insist on it at the mail server as well.
>While th
As painful as using Outlook 97 is for e-mail it worked for me. I was just
using Outlook for my calendar and contacts so I figured I'd try it as an
e-mail client. I didn't use it long because it was very feature poor.
With the Outlook internet mail connectors I believe it's your basic,
poorly im
>Scalability: If your server workload on Sendmail is running too high, you
>can mirror the box over to another machine and load-balance your email
>simply by adding an MX record of equal priority.
Heh, I saw an Oracle ad today boasting about how their mail server could
outpreform something like
Standard E-Mail as in MS Office 97's Outlook. Has anyone used outlook with
sendmail as the server before? If so where there any problems?
>If you are just going to be using standard e-mail then as per the above
>there is absolutely no reason to use Exchange. You can set up Linux and
>Sendmail
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Steve Curry wrote:
> Ok we have some clients that want to put in an M$ Exchange server for
> internal company mail. The workstations are Win95 machines that are running
> Micro$oft Outlook as the client. I suggested a Linux box with sendmail over
> Exchange beca
your time,
StarrDust
--
From: Greg Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 1998 7:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Sendmail vs MS Exchange Server + MS Outlook
As painful as using Outlook 97 is for e-mail it worked for me. I was just
using Outlook for my calendar and contacts so
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Patrick Scott Darden wrote:
> Cons: exchange is a messaging server, not just email--you lose a
> lot of functionality unless you also employ a program like ICQ,
> plus perhaps a local news server, etc.
Well, the best thing about Unix is that you don't ha
ook which comes with IE4.0 (Outlook Express))! In this
environment Outlook 97 rocks! I don't see how the features it supports
were even thought of, it's so good! But as a POP3 client it's way too
slow... I used it that way myself for a while and found it so as does
nearly ever
obably
still a fair sight faster than Exchange Server, however. :)
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> I am just a newbie here on the RH list, so please excuse any bad manners
> of crashing into a conversation,
> but uh-h-h, could you be just a bit more detailed in what you mean when you
> say Outlook is 'feature poor', and what more Eudora has to offer as far as
> features.
>
The one big thi
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Steve Curry wrote:
> Standard E-Mail as in MS Office 97's Outlook. Has anyone used outlook with
> sendmail as the server before? If so where there any problems?
Lots, because sendmail isn't the server that Outlook uses. You should be
looking at the IMAP and/or POP3 servers (
1998, Steve Curry wrote:
> Ok we have some clients that want to put in an M$ Exchange server for
> internal company mail. The workstations are Win95 machines that are running
> Micro$oft Outlook as the client. I suggested a Linux box with sendmail over
> Exchange because it would b
Steve,
The server has to have pop3 support installed as well as sendmail.
Configure outlook as a pop3 client.
It works great except that outlook is a very 'thick' client - takes
forever to load, and wastes a lot of ram if all you use it for is email -
look at eudora pro or calypso as better sin9
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Pat Hennessy wrote:
> Although one thing i just thought of...
>
> If the server with the directories that are nfs mounte'd from the other
> machines goes down for whatever reason, you'd be stuck without mail until
> that machine comes back up.
The solution we use is a SCSI R
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Pat Hennessy wrote:
> > > > Scalability: If your server workload on Sendmail is running too high, you
> > > > can mirror the box over to another machine and load-balance your email
> > > > simply by adding an MX record of equal priority.
Use mulitpe MX records with equal prio
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Pat Hennessy wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Greg Thomas wrote:
> >
> > > > Scalability: If your server workload on Sendmail is running too high, you
> > > > can mirror the box over to another machine and load-balance yo
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Greg Thomas wrote:
>
> > > Scalability: If your server workload on Sendmail is running too high, you
> > > can mirror the box over to another machine and load-balance your email
> > > simply by adding an MX record of equal prior
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Greg Thomas wrote:
> > Scalability: If your server workload on Sendmail is running too high, you
> > can mirror the box over to another machine and load-balance your email
> > simply by adding an MX record of equal priority.
How would this be easily accomplished? We're migra
> Cost: Hardware: Lesser machine required
> Software: Zero. vs NT Server, MS Exchange Server and
> all appropriate license fees. (can get hefty
> in a heavy multi-user environment)
>
> Reliability: Linux servers tend to have uptim
Cost: Hardware: Lesser machine required
Software: Zero. vs NT Server, MS Exchange Server and
all appropriate license fees. (can get hefty
in a heavy multi-user environment)
Reliability: Linux servers tend to have uptimes rated in months, whereas
Ok we have some clients that want to put in an M$ Exchange server for
internal company mail. The workstations are Win95 machines that are running
Micro$oft Outlook as the client. I suggested a Linux box with sendmail over
Exchange because it would be less of an investment and it would run a lot
100 matches
Mail list logo
