Some more comments inline
Lets see if I can articulate this a little better. My thinking is that
taget= represents a binding independent way to resolve an endpoint. It
doesnt necessarily specify the contents of the effective URI that is
used to address an endpoint.
+1
In the
On Jan 31, 2008 5:04 PM, Lou Amodeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have a question about the implementation of the wsdlless
deployment
function.
The issues I see are occurring in a couple of places within the
life-cycle.
Namely, deployment, binding start, and service definition. It occurs
I'm looking at copying the 1.1 release artifacts up onto the new
distribution infrastructure at
www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
We need to make a decision about how this will be structured. As a default I
assume we stick pretty much with what we have already (see
Hi
The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev
list [1] I am posting here before proceeding to copy the artifacts up to
www.apache.org/dist/incubator.
The proposal it to use a similar release
On Feb 3, 2008 12:31 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 4:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany
dev
list [1
Thanks for the speedy feedback.
On Feb 3, 2008 4:55 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 3:53 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We know how we want our distribution directories structured (see start
of
thread).
great
There is a draft release
: Ben Smith
Assignee: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
Attachments: ConversationExpiry.patch
In services that are marked as @Conversational yet have scope of
STATELESS the following problems occur
Caused
The Apache Tuscany team are delighted to announce the 1.1 release of the
Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service Component
Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
application development. These specifications are
On Feb 8, 2008 4:27 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I can't seem to spot the 1.1 artifacts over at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Is this intentional - has the repo location changed? Or has it just
slipped through the net?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
On Feb 8, 2008 4:31 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 4:27 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I can't seem to spot the 1.1 artifacts over at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
Is this intentional - has the repo location
On Feb 6, 2008 1:36 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've about 170 open JIRAs for SCA, (currently split over 3 versions but
i'll go move all the SCA ones to SCA-next), what shall we do about them?
There's various suggestions for how to improve JIRA handling listed at:
On Feb 10, 2008 12:50 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried my app a while ago in a 16 node-cluster and I'm publishing
my result at
http://www.cli.di.unipi.it/~zoppi/out/ch06.htmlhttp://www.cli.di.unipi.it/%7Ezoppi/out/ch06.html
They are in italian but you can find many
Hi Venkat
A question.
snip...
- In the contribution read phase, we postpone the reading of composite
files
so that all definitions.xml file contents can all be aggregated
Do you mean all the definitions.xml files in the contribution or all the
definitions.xml files in the domain?
Simon
On Feb 12, 2008 8:18 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 1:09 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Venkat
A question.
snip...
- In the contribution read phase, we postpone the reading of composite
files
so that all definitions.xml file
snip..
On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Because we are now computing the 'applicablePolicySets' for various
SCA artifacts and that needs the list of 'all' PolicySets that might be
applicable ever.
So, in the code today, how do you know you have
On Feb 12, 2008 2:41 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip..
On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Because we are now computing the 'applicablePolicySets' for
various
SCA artifacts and that needs the list of 'all' PolicySets that might
snip...
against the aggregated union of all definitions. Do you see something
missing ?
The point I'm interested in is what happens to the composites that belong
to contributions that have previously been added when you add a new
contribution, for example,
ContributionA
definitions.xml(A)
snip...
in definitions.xml(A). But, is this sort of re-processing / rebuild is a
requirment only in this context ? If there are other contexts as well,
such
as re-wiring and we there is going to be a separate phase for this, then
I'd
like to do this as well in that phase.
Absolutely.
re. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2043
Part of the the fix for this involves removing a FIXME in
org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.wsdl.xml.XSDModelResolver. Specifically
at the bottom of the aggregate method I need to comment out two lines...
// FIXME: [rfeng] This is
Hi
It's probably about time we started talking about what's going to be in
Tuscany SCA Java release 1.2. From the past timeline I would expect us to be
trying for a release mid to late March which is not very far away.
Some of the things I'd like to see are;
More progress on our domain level
- Original Message -
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 6:15 AM
Subject: Processing multiple WSDLs in the same namespace
re. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2043
Part of the the fix
Raymond,
A couple of comments below..
My preference would be to check in the changes I've made that make the itest
(wsdl-multiple) that I've just checked in at least work. I can then close
JIRA-2043 that relates to a very specific problem and raise a new one that
discusses the general situation.
On Feb 15, 0008 4:09 PM, Continuum VMBuild Server [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=51091projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Building
Started at: Fri 15 Feb 2008 07:06:27 -0800
Finished at:
Hi Rajini
just back in from vacation and catching up. I've put some comments in line
but the text seems to be circling around a few hot issues:
- How closely class loading should be related to model resolution, i.e.
options 1 and 2 from previously in this thread
- Support for split
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have been working on modifying the existing bigbank demo to include
security (things that have been tried and working in the securie-bigbank
demo).
All seemed fine, until I tried the modified bigbank demo from
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to add a few iTests for Conversation Lifetime items that
don't seem to have explicit tests, In particular, I am looking at:
1) The ability to continue a conversation by loading a reference
that had been
So, just to be clear again...
Hi Venkat
Can I just clarify that you are saying that you are having problems
because
of the way that the shader plugin is aggregating the definitions.xmlfiles
that now appear in various extension modules, e.g. binding-ws-axis2,
poilcy-logging et.
Hi Rajini
I'm covering old ground here but trying to make sure I'm looking at this in
the right way.
A - How closely class loading should be related to model resolution, i.e.
options 1 and 2 from previously in this thread
A1 (classloader uses model resolver) - standardizes the artifact
Downloading:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-antrun-plugin/1.1/maven-antrun-plugin-1.1.pom
1Khttp://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-antrun-plugin/1.1/maven-antrun-plugin-1.1.pom1Kdownloaded
Matthew
Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
25/02/2008 12
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Sandeep Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Can the composite file be exposed as a web service to external world.
how can i go about it. can you please guide me.
regards
Sandeep Raman.
=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this
Sebastien
This looks interesting. Can you say a little about how this will be used.
I'm interested as I'd like to see us open up the contribution service a bit
and provide some interfaces that allow us to operate on contributions (find
artifacts, read artifacts, resolve artifacts etc.) rather
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could be
used to check if a service is receptive to requests. Infact I wonder if
the
Workspace Admin should also be able
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Looks good to me, building on your initial list I added a few more
items
and tried to organize them in three categories:
A) Contribution workspace (containing installed
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Sebastien
This looks interesting. Can you say a little about how this will be
used.
I'm interested as I'd like to see us open up the contribution service a
bit
and provide some
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a fair amount of special handling code for composites and
policySets in ContributionServiceImpl.
I guess these are hacked workarounds for some issues? any idea what the
issues were?
--
Jean-Sebastien
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a fair amount of special handling code for composites and
policySets in ContributionServiceImpl
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could
be
used to check if a service
Are comments posted against SVN commit messages in tuscany-dev archived
anywhere?
Simon
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not sure I understood what you are looking for, but tuscany-commits is
archived in [1]
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-commits%40ws.apache.org/maillist.html
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Looks good to me, building on your initial list I added a few more
items
and tried to organize them
snip...
Could we just add our own Shade transformer that knows how to aggregate
the
definitions files? Eg TO SUPPORT something like this in the shade plugin
config:
transformer implementation=
org.apache.tuscany.sca.tools.ShadeDefinitionsTransformer
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I find that ServiceDiscovery is getting to be used widely and want to move
it out of Contribution module to a separate module like Utils. The
immediate benefit I see from this is some relief from cyclic
- Venkat
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip...
Could we just add our own Shade transformer that knows how to
aggregate
the
definitions files? Eg TO SUPPORT something like this in the shade
plugin
config:
transformer implementation
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Now that I finished support for Resource import/export, I was thinking
on updating our Store Tutorial to share a common store.html in the
tutorial-assets.
Thoughts ?
[1]
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Matthew Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I too am puzzled by the question. They are both important. What would be a
scenario in which one would have to choose?
Matthew
Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/03/2008 13:13
Please respond to
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1:34 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Please vote on one of the following five options to define
allowsPassByReference property for Invokers. You can vote with multiple
choices
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I apologize in advance for the inline comment puzzle, but you had
started with a long email in the first place :)
no problem at all. Thanks
and extensibility story.
+1 to that.
Simon Laws wrote:
If we are going to stick using the shader to produce an all jar then
we
need something to aggregate definitions files together correctly. People
may
put definitions.xml files in the same place in different modules by
accident
even if we
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering what our tuscany-maven-dependency-lister plugin provides
over
the maven-dependency-plugin. The following command can give us a nice
dependency tree of a project:
mvn dependency:tree
Thanks,
Raymond
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
In tuscany-sca (1.1 above) , there are two modules related with java2wsdl:
1.) modules\interface-wsdl-java2wsdl
2.) tools\java2wsdl
The java2wsdl interface(1) provides a runtime interface to handle java
object to wsdl
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I apologize in advance
of the discussion about removing SDO from the
Tuscany
charter... but if SDO is no
longer a special part of the Tuscany project then what would happen to
the
W2J/J2W tools built around
SDO support?
Scott
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue
be great In the mean time, it
would be good if we all could take a quick look at JIRAs and start
fixing them or marking them for 1.2 release.
Thoughts ?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Sandeep
Are you able to provide the test case which is giving the error? If so the
best thing to do is open a JIRA and attach it there so someone can run it
and track down the problem.
Just taking a wild stab in the dark it would appear that the runtime is not
able to find the appropriate
TUSCANY-2055 has raised an issue where we need some spec clarity. Namely, in
relation to the function ServiceReference.getConversationID(), the Java
Annotations and API V1 spec says a few things.
521 1.6.6.2. Accessing Conversation IDs from Clients
522 Whether the conversation ID is chosen by the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TUSCANY-2055 has raised an issue where we need some spec clarity. Namely,
in relation to the function ServiceReference.getConversationID(), the Java
Annotations and API V1 spec says a few things.
521 1.6.6.2. Accessing
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
A) Contribution workspace (containing installed contributions):
- Contribution model representing a contribution
- Reader for the contribution model
- Workspace model representing a
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Improving the XQuery component implementation type could be a good
candidate.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating
the
new code in assembly which calculates service endpoints i.e. point4
above.
I
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating
the
new
Sorry folks. That's me. Looks like I missed a pom change.
Simon
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jsdelfino
Date: Sun Mar 9 22:43:19 2008
New Revision: 635435
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635435view=rev
Log:
Fixed algorithm in CompositeConfigurationBuilder to produce correct URIs,
in particular avoid adding
Comments inline
snip...
and that's OK I think :) as binding.ws and binding.jsonrpc could end up
on different port numbers for example (depending on their node
configuration).
And they might not.
Actually, I was struggling to understand why we needed this test for
duplicate names
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:33 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It would be great if people could start changing the subject when
replying with comments to a given committs, this would allow others to
better
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to resolve TUSCANY-2055 based on the most recent comment
that I appended referring to the resolution of OASIS issue JAVA-31.
Does anyone object to my marking this resolved? If not, I will go
ahead and do this
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: lresende
Date: Tue Mar 11 20:01:48 2008
New Revision: 636186
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=636186view=rev
Log:
Changing HTTP port in use, to avoid build issues on Continuum
Modified:
if the sample/calculator-distributed goes ok.
Regards
Simon
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg02610.html
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM
I chatted with Venkat earlier today on #tuscany about changes he proposed to
contribution processing. This is input to the wider, what do we do about
contribution processing and workspace debate
Venkat irc://freenode/Venkat,isnickI am trying to clean up the
contribution service imple a bit
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas Leite wrote:
Hello Community!
I was not so active in the Tuscany project in the last months, because I
was
busy finishing my Computer Science college degree, and preparing some
things
related to
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are we targetting this for our SCA 1.2 Release ? Could you please
update ASF headers on the composite files and anywhere else needed.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: slaws
Date:
I'm getting.
org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.service.ContributionReadException:
javax.xml
.xpath.XPathExpressionException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException:
Extra
illegal tokens: 'http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0', ':', 'binding.sca'
at
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now that we are near the release of Java SCA 1,2, I'd like to propose
changing the trunk pom version to 2-incubating-SNAPSHOT around the
same time we create the SCA 1.2 release branch.
Thoughts ?
--
Luciano Resende
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm getting.
org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.service.ContributionReadException:
javax.xml
.xpath.XPathExpressionException: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException:
Extra
illegal tokens: 'http://www.osoa.org/xmlns
I notice there is another problem in continuum at the moment but I still
haven't fixed the calculated-distributed fault. I've spent time installing a
build on linux and getting Eclipse up and running. It's some kind of XML
parsing problem but interestingly it happens when the workspace is run from
I've added most of the files attached to TUSCANY-1863, TUSCANY-1907 to svn.
I've taken the liberty of removing what seem to be work files, and I've
added ASF headers where I can. I've put the new assembly files into the
contribution-updater module for now while we learn ho it hangs together.
I've
I've put my notes from release 1.1 up at [1]. This a further development of
Ant's original notes and many of the commands here are from Raymond's script
[2]. Thanks guys.
There is a general high level check list and then a detailed step by step
guide. This is just a brain dump from my R1.1
Hi Simon
Do you have Daniel's test in a position where you could check it in?
Simon
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nash
Date: Sun Mar 16 10:59:45 2008
New Revision: 637621
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=637621view=rev
Log:
Fix for TUSCANY-2077
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Simon
Do you have Daniel's test in a position where you could check it in?
I do have his test running, but for some reason it never failed
for me, even when the printlns showed the incorrect
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:49 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I tried to build itest/osgi-tuscany to see what its time and space
overheads are, but I ran into multiple errors (incorrect pom and some
tests
I got the code done last week but I'm only just now finishing up the
build.xml file. So, as promised, here's what I did (a bit of a long post but
I think I got it all)
Firstly to get more familiar with the workspace I followed Sebastien's
instructions from the Domain/Contribution repository
I'm trying to run the calculator-distribute sample with the workspace
changes from an ant build.xml. I'm getting
runDomain:
[java] 19-Mar-2008 11:23:38
org.apache.tuscany.sca.workspace.admin.launcher
.DomainAdminLauncher main
[java] INFO: Apache Tuscany SCA Domain Administration
Hi Venkat
I think that definitions.xml can be provided to Tuscany in two ways. Either
in a contribution or in an extension library. I also think that the contents
of definitions.xml files provided in either of these ways should be added to
the domain wide pool of intents and policy sets and
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm trying to run the calculator-distribute sample with the workspace
changes from an ant build.xml. I'm getting
runDomain:
[java] 19-Mar-2008 11:23:38
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mail rule/filter set up to route the JIRA messages into a
separate
folder in my inbox.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Kevin Williams wrote:
I am thinking of adding a new test bucket specifically for
verification testing against the specification set. I believe it
would add value to the project and may also be a place
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Forgot to mention in my earlier post. I am using Maven 2.0.6, Sun JDK
1.5.0on Windows XP.
++Vamsi
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am hitting a build error on
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Release+-+Java+SCA+1.2#Release-JavaSCA1.2-Modulesincludedinthedistribution
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I've just committed the patch from TUSCANY-2099. The patch is a few more
steps on the way to getting the workpool demo running with the latest code
and it introduces a new dependency on Drools. It's ASL2 licenses but I want
to call it out here in case anyone has any concerns.
Thanks
Simon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've just committed the patch from TUSCANY-2099. The patch is a few more
steps on the way to getting the workpool demo running with the latest code
and it introduces a new dependency on Drools. It's ASL2 licenses but I want
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Do you still see issues after revision #639171 ? If so, could you
please give me the names of missing jars
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Forgot to mention in my earlier post. I am using Maven 2.0.6, Sun JDK
1.5.0on Windows XP.
++Vamsi
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:02 PM
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
As part of TUSCANY-2115 [1] I have some local changes to remove the
following projects :
...
-
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Sandeep Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi ,
I followed the same blog. But culdnt get it working.
What else can i try out.
Regards,
Sandeep.
Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/25/2008 04:31:23 PM:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Sandeep Raman
Hi Girogio
Sorry for slow response. Been out for a few days. Some comments in line
Simon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
the next patch for my demo it will be in the CompositeBuilder. I have
to do refactoring in this
area to allow a fine
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Congratulations Giorgio!!
++Vamsi
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:31 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Giorgio Zoppi to
become
a
Tuscany committer.
Hi Hasan
Adriano is correct about the xsd validation. I've made some more comments in
line. Looking at the range of questions you are asking maybe what we could
do is create and itest to cover the range of validation features that
Tuscany should support and we can concentrate there on improving
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I started investigating TUSCANY-2112. The approach I am taking is to make
something like the following work without having to annotate the java
interfaces with @Conversational etc.
component
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Sandeep Raman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I get this error:
/ExceptionError 404: SRVE0190E: File not found: /ComposerService
on touching my URL:
http://172.19.103.18:9080/LOSComposite/ComposerService
in websphere while calling up my composite application
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
1101 - 1200 of 1885 matches
Mail list logo
