change and not a simple upgrade with a version
>> bump.
>>
>> There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
>> apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
>> available alone in maven central:
>> https://mvnrepository.com/arti
tation.sql;
>> }
>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Until 9.0.37 tomcat-embed-core.jar did not have a module-info. Now in
>>>>>> 9.0.38 it does. This changes the modules I need to require when using
>>>>>> it. This may be the right w
e the right way to be doing thing all along, but it does
>>>>> feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
>>>>> bump.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.
feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
bump.
There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
available alone in maven central:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mvnrepository.com/artifact
gt;> 9.0.38 it does. This changes the modules I need to require when using
>>> it. This may be the right way to be doing thing all along, but it does
>>> feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
>>> bump.
>>>
>>> Th
a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
bump.
There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
available alone in maven central:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mvnrepository.com/artifact
mcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
> apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
> available alone in maven central:
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tomcat.embed
I suspect the new JAR was added to the main build script but not the
script that
be the right way to be doing thing all along, but it does
feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version bump.
There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
available alone in maven central
On 7/25/2016 3:45 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 12:42 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> I'm going to do a bit of trimming here:
>>
>> On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>
>> # # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your
>> aliases #
>>
>> ProxyPass "/bb" !
On 7/25/2016 12:42 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> I'm going to do a bit of trimming here:
>
> On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>
> # # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your
> aliases #
>
> ProxyPass "/bb" ! ProxyPass "/tt" !
This works now. Thanks
I'm going to do a bit of trimming here:
On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
# # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your
aliases #
ProxyPass "/bb" ! ProxyPass "/tt" !
>>> This works now. Thanks
# # Also this would be a good idea to prevent
On 7/24/2016 11:33 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 7/24/2016 5:10 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016
On 7/24/2016 5:10 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Paul,
On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Paul,
On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat
On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
deployed. Thank you
On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
>>> deployed. Thank you very much!!!
>>> A few things that still need
On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> > http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
> > deployed. Thank you very much!!!
>
> > A few things that still need correction...
>
> > Not all my webpages/servlets are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
> deployed. Thank you very much!!!
>
> A few things that still need correction...
>
> Not all my webpages/servlets are https, just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
On 7/22/16 4:24 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/22/2016 4:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> You can even use either HTTP or AJP as the protocol to connect
>> httpd -> Tomcat. I would recommend mod_proxy_http just because
>> it's basically
On 7/23/2016 4:12 AM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading
>>> >the ajp documentation.
>>> >Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message.
>>>
On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote:
I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading
>the ajp documentation.
>Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message.
and proxyPort on your connector so
>>> >> that any links generated by your application don't try and bypass
>>> >> the proxy (see:
>>> >> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Common_Attr
>>> ibutes).
>>>
>>
ttps://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Common_Attr
>> ibutes).
>>
>> >>
>> Don't know what AJP is. Therefore I assume it is not in use. If my
>> > understand of AJP is correct, based on a 5 minute read on
>> > Wikipedia, I only
> that any links generated by your application don't try and bypass
> >> the proxy (see:
> >> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Common_Attr
> ibutes).
>
> >>
> Don't know what AJP is. Therefore I assume it is not in use. If my
> &
ttp.html#Common_Attr
ibutes).
>
>>
Don't know what AJP is. Therefore I assume it is not in use. If my
> understand of AJP is correct, based on a 5 minute read on
> Wikipedia, I only have one server so there is no value in AJP for
> me.
If you are starting from scratch
t Users List
>>> Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>>> I am trying to install the mod_
On 22.07.2016 09:18, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>Paul
On 7/21/2016 2:21 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host TomEE
>> (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the same
>> server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this.
> TomEE can run outside of a web
> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host TomEE
> (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the same
> server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this.
TomEE can run outside of a web server (its it's on web container), but
Bugzilla
Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host
TomEE (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the
same server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this. It is
also my understanding that I needed mod_jk to have the httpd route to
TomEE
Is there some reason that you can't use mod_proxy_balancer instead of
mod_cluster (if you don't want to be vulnerable to the known CVEs)? I
assume that you're looking for some specific logic offered by
mod_cluster, but since you're considering mod_jk I'm not so sure. If
you're going to learn to
I can not use mod_cluster. I was having some issues and posted this
(https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/91235/module-mod_proxy_balancer-is-loaded-it-must-be-removed-in-order-for-mod_proxy_cluster-to-function-properly/)
question on the Fedora forums.
See the reply I got below.
Please, *do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul,
On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68
> (TomEE) server.
>
> I am reading this
> https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html
>
>
documentation
I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68 (TomEE)
server.
I am reading this
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html
documentation which points to this
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi download page. But
there is no binary
, but I couldn't find
it.
I'm looking at using tomcat in a docker container and I was
wondering why there isn't a binary distribution that has most /
all of the steps already done from the security how to?
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-howto.html
I understand
Hi all.
Sorry if this has already been answered, but I couldn't find it.
I'm looking at using tomcat in a docker container and I was wondering why
there isn't a binary distribution that has most / all of the steps already
done from the security how to?
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc
On 23 July 2015 15:07:01 CEST, Jim Sellers jim.sell...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all.
Sorry if this has already been answered, but I couldn't find it.
I'm looking at using tomcat in a docker container and I was wondering
why
there isn't a binary distribution that has most / all of the steps
already
there isn't a binary distribution that has most / all of the steps
already
done from the security how to?
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-howto.html
I understand that there wouldn't be a true one size fits all, but I
rather
than get everyone to try to follow the same
Hi,
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running Tomcat 5.5,
which was provided as a rpm from the distributor.
Our developers need now a more current version, 6 or prefered 7.
I didn't find rpm's for these versions for my OS. So i have to install the
binary version from
From: Lentes, Bernd [bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 18:45
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: binary distribution - how to upgrade ?
Hi,
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running Tomcat 5.5,
which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bernd,
On 6/20/13 12:45 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running
Tomcat 5.5, which was provided as a rpm from the distributor. Our
developers need now a more current version, 6 or prefered 7.
On 20/06/2013 19:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Bernd,
On 6/20/13 12:45 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running
Tomcat 5.5, which was provided as a rpm from the distributor. Our
developers need now a more current version, 6 or prefered
Hi Bernd,
Am 20.06.2013 18:45, schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
Hi,
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running Tomcat 5.5,
which was provided as a rpm from the distributor.
Our developers need now a more current version, 6 or prefered 7.
I didn't find rpm's for these versions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/20/13 3:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/06/2013 19:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Once you have set up the environment for
CATALINA_HOME/CATALINA_BASE, it's fairly simple to upgrade to a
new version of Tomcat:
1. Install the new
that this .jar is outside
the normal apache tomcat distribution.
The jar seems very useful, so I assume there is some reason it is not rolled
into the distribution.
Question: How safe (/common) is it to use code from contributors apache
sites in a production system?
Thanks for any insight
Dunlow, do you also have the oracle jar?
ojdbc14_g.jar?
-Original Message-
From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:20 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: How safe is using Tomcat code outside of normal distribution (from
contributors)?
Hi
code outside of normal distribution
(from contributors)?
Hi,
(This questions spun off of my old question
http://old.nabble.com/Why-can%27t-Tomcat-find-class-org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool-DataSourceFactory--td31441243.html).
The jar tomcat-jdbc.jar (from http://people.apache.org
Is that more current than the 14_g version?
-Original Message-
From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:56 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: How safe is using Tomcat code outside of normal distribution (from
contributors)?
yes (ojdbc6.jar
code outside of normal distribution
(from contributors)?
yes (ojdbc6.jar to be exact)
Propes, Barry L wrote:
Dunlow, do you also have the oracle jar?
ojdbc14_g.jar?
-Original Message-
From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:20 AM
distribution (from
contributors)?
Yes, it's the thin client for jdk 1.6
Propes, Barry L wrote:
Is that more current than the 14_g version?
-Original Message-
From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:56 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
outside of normal distribution
(from contributors)?
Yes, it's the thin client for jdk 1.6
Propes, Barry L wrote:
Is that more current than the 14_g version?
-Original Message-
From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:56 AM
To: users
outside of normal distribution (from
contributors)?
Barry, let's move this conversation to the other thread (the initial one) I was
hoping to get feedback here regarding using code from Apache for tomcat outside
of the normal delivery. (and yes, I'd like to start using the tomcat
connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dunnlow,
On 4/21/2011 11:20 AM, dunnlow wrote:
The jar tomcat-jdbc.jar (from http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/)
seems to be what I need. HOWEVER, I am concerned that this .jar is outside
the normal apache tomcat distribution
Hello,
Just performed a download on the 6.0.29 version of the software, and
after performing a Sophos Anti-virus scan found the following four files
to be corrupt: dso-dlfcn.o, locks.o, replace.o, signals.o. These files
were found within the commons-daemon-native.tar.gz for the
2010/8/25 Clifton, Matthew R (AS) matthew.clif...@ngc.com:
Just performed a download on the 6.0.29 version of the software, and
after performing a Sophos Anti-virus scan found the following four files
to be corrupt: dso-dlfcn.o, locks.o, replace.o, signals.o. These files
were found within the
to take tomcat pid on windows on command
prombt?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/how-to-find-tomcat-binary-distribution-service-name-tp26329176p26349576.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
From: SRamasamy [mailto:su...@techie.com]
Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
Tomcat have service name and also its configured with server.xml
The name configured in server.xml and the Windows service name are completely
independent. The Windows service name
SRama wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution),
there are two (a zip and an exe). which one did you install ?
tomcat working fine here I would
like to find tomcat service name, When I try to find through taskmanager
ah! you are under Windows. Good to know
Thanks for your reply
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am starting
through startup.bat file
awarnier wrote:
SRama wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution),
there are two (a zip and an exe). which one did you install ?
tomcat working
Thanks for your reply
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am starting
through startup.bat file
awarnier wrote:
SRama wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution),
there are two (a zip and an exe). which one did you install ?
tomcat working
From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
Subject: Re: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am
starting through startup.bat file
Then you're not running it as a service, so there is no service name. If you
want
SRama wrote:
Thanks for your reply
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am starting
through startup.bat file
Ok then, you are not running Tomcat as a service, you are running it
from a command window.
That is a good reason why you do not find its name
tomcat binary distribution service name
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am
starting through startup.bat file
Then you're not running it as a service, so there is no service name. If
you want to install Tomcat as a service, use the service.bat script
Thanks for your reply, if want to do through command prompt using net start
user need admin rights.
to start install ?
o
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
please let me know how to start
From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
please let me know how to start through service.bat
As previously stated, the service.bat script only installs (or removes) the
Tomcat service. To start the service, use the tomcat6w.exe
how to find tomcat wheter
tomcat is stated or not ?
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
if want to do through command prompt using net start
user need admin rights to start install ?
I
From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
if i use tomcat binary version start startup.bat how to find tomcat
wheter tomcat is stated or not ?
Send Tomcat an HTTP request with a wget program. Versions exist in both C and
Java
From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
if want to do through command prompt using net start
user need admin rights to start install ?
I believe that is true for all methods of starting a service.
- Chuck
Hi Guys,
I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution), tomcat working fine here I would
like to find tomcat service name, When I try to find through taskmanager it
will not showing anything related to tomcat but it showing only java.exe,
please let me know how to find corresponding tomcat service
Norheim wrote:
Hi,
I would like someone's opinion on the following issue that we have
discovered using the windows distribution of Tomcat 6. (tested for
Tomcat 6.0.14, 6.0.16 and 6.0.20 downloaded from [1] )
The documentation for Tomcat 6 states
It would be quite unsafe to ship Tomcat
You're right, I totally forgot to put appBase attributes in my Host
declarations. However, httpd only lets *.jsp and *.do requests pass on to
Tomcat so I don't have to worry about the security issue.
I'm gonna put appBase attributes into my config and see if that fixes it.
thanks
On Fri, Oct
OK I just added the appBase attr to a Host in my server.xml. It did get rid
of the Tomcat install. folders showing up as webapps, but it isnt' doing
exactly what I thought it would do. Now everything in my appBase shows up
in my Manager instance as belonging to that Host, when what I want there
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Jonathan Mast
jhmast.develo...@gmail.com wrote:
My reading of the Tomcat config docs seemed to indicate that each Host
should have it's own Manager Context defined as opposed to having a single
Manager instance that can span multiple Hosts. Is this correct?
So you are saying each Host *must* have it's own distinct appBase. That
sucks, doing that will make my deployment process a nightmare. Any way
around the problem I described above?
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Hassan Schroeder
hassan.schroe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:35
From: Jonathan Mast [mailto:jhmast.develo...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Tomcat Manager sees distribution directories as
applications
So you are saying each Host *must* have it's own distinct appBase.
That sucks, doing that will make my deployment process a nightmare.
Any way around
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Jonathan Mast
jhmast.develo...@gmail.com wrote:
So you are saying each Host *must* have it's own distinct appBase.
Not must, but that's the easy/simple/standard way to do it, and of
course you're free to complicate your life in any number of ways by
fighting it.
By nightmare I meant complexity. Currently all my webapps are located in a
single directory, its flat, it only contains webapps (IE. folders with a
WEB-INF directory). I have approximately a dozen Hosts defined across 3
domain names (and every intention of adding more). Some Hosts have single
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
On 11/2/2009 2:37 PM, Jonathan Mast wrote:
By nightmare I meant complexity. Currently all my webapps are located in a
single directory, its flat, it only contains webapps (IE. folders with a
WEB-INF directory). I have approximately a
Jonathan Mast wrote:
/
--/webapps
-/host_MY_HOST
---/MY_CONTEXT
Is it not more like
server
-- Host1
--webapps
-- manager
-- your app 1
-- your app 2
-- others
-- Host2
--webapps
-- manager
Thanks Chris, I'm now just pointing the appBase to an empty directory and
everything looks great. A lot easier than reorganizing my server setup.
Although I do agree with everyone that that approach (each Host has it's own
dir) is more *correct* the complexity of it just too much for my
When I log into the Tomcat Web Application Manager, in addition to the
actual webapps defined in server.xml, it also lists the /bin, /conf, /logs,
/temp, /lib and /work directories of the Tomcat installation as if they are
webapps.
I doubt this is correct, so how do I fix it?
thanks,
Tomcat 6
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Mast
jhmast.develo...@gmail.com wrote:
When I log into the Tomcat Web Application Manager, in addition to the
actual webapps defined in server.xml, it also lists the /bin, /conf, /logs,
/temp, /lib and /work directories of the Tomcat installation as if
I think it must be because all the webapps except the manager webapp is
actually located outside of tomcat's dir (its in httpd's directory).
Its too late in the day for the sanitization needed with my server.xml, but
I think the cause is the dir issue above.
thanks
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:07
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hassan,
On 10/30/2009 5:07 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Mast
jhmast.develo...@gmail.com wrote:
When I log into the Tomcat Web Application Manager, in addition to the
actual webapps defined in server.xml,
Hi,
I would like someone's opinion on the following issue that we have
discovered using the windows distribution of Tomcat 6. (tested for
Tomcat 6.0.14, 6.0.16 and 6.0.20 downloaded from [1] )
The documentation for Tomcat 6 states
It would be quite unsafe to ship Tomcat with default
discovered using the windows distribution of Tomcat 6. (tested for
Tomcat 6.0.14, 6.0.16 and 6.0.20 downloaded from [1] )
The documentation for Tomcat 6 states
It would be quite unsafe to ship Tomcat with default settings that
allowed anyone on the Internet to execute the Manager application
instance, and one of the
lines reads:
line 109:
---
* bin - Only setenv.sh (*nix) and setenv.bat (windows)
---
So it tells us that the bin folder must be created with only
setenv.sh file copied over. The problem is that there is NO
setenv.sh file in the distribution itself, so
in the distribution itself, so there is nothing to be copied over.
Correct. It is an optional file that you create it you need it.
Then I tried to run the thing without any files copied over in the bin
folder, and it complained that the file setclasspath.sh is missing.
In which case you
Hi Steve,
CentOs had troubles with Dell blade video card and ACPI functions.
Sorry, I can't be more precise because it was quite a time ago.
Maybe, the problem was around dell server...isn't it!!
Steve Ochani wrote:
On 14 Nov 2007 at 22:58, Lionel Crine wrote:
another distribution
15, 2007 5:54 AM, Peter Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server
with
an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
The one with which your organisation already
Unfortunately too many IT teams that I've encountered tend towards the Ooh,
shiny new toy! and My server's newer than your server views of the world.
Heh heh, shiny new toy syndrome, where would the 'IT business' be without it.
comp.lang.java.programmer has some really bilious postings from
From: Warren Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Point taken. We ran a Vax until last year...
On Nov 15, 2007 10:52 AM, Steve Ochani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If everyone based their decisions solely on that criteria
we would be all using pdp-11s.
[...]
I think some companies are rather
From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
The one with which your organisation already has experience. Familiarity and
ease of admin is king here
And that is the correct answer.
On Nov 15, 2007 5:54 AM, Peter Crowther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
The one
opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server
with
an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
The one with which your organisation already has experience.
Familiarity and ease of admin is king here.
- Peter
Hi!
In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
An opinion taking as a basis the performance and cost.
Thanks
-
To start a new topic, e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew,
Andrew Hole wrote:
In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
An opinion taking as a basis the performance and cost.
Do you need corporate support
go for Open Solaris.. www.opensolaris.org
Thanks
On Nov 14, 2007 11:18 PM, Andrew Hole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
An opinion taking as a basis
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
