gnificant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
>> bump.
>>
>> There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
>> apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
>> available alone in maven central:
>> https://mvnrepositor
exports javax.annotation.sql;
>> }
>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Until 9.0.37 tomcat-embed-core.jar did not have a module-info. Now in
>>>>>> 9.0.38 it does. This changes the modules I need to require when using
>>>>>> it. This may
;> it. This may be the right way to be doing thing all along, but it does
>>>>> feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
>>>>> bump.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is also a new tomcat
ng, but it does
feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
bump.
There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
available alone in maven central:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mvnreposito
o. Now in
>>> 9.0.38 it does. This changes the modules I need to require when using
>>> it. This may be the right way to be doing thing all along, but it does
>>> feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
>>> bump.
>>>
>&g
oes
feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version
bump.
There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
available alone in maven central:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mvnreposito
new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
> apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
> available alone in maven central:
> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.tomcat.embed
I suspect the new JAR was added to the main build script but not the
scri
may be the right way to be doing thing all along, but it does
feel like a significant change and not a simple upgrade with a version bump.
There is also a new tomcat-embed-programmatic.jar in the
apache-tomcat-9.0.38-embed.zip distribution but it does not seem to be
available alone in mav
On 7/25/2016 3:45 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 7/25/2016 12:42 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> I'm going to do a bit of trimming here:
>>
>> On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>
>> # # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your
>> aliases #
>>
>> ProxyPass "/bb" !
On 7/25/2016 12:42 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> I'm going to do a bit of trimming here:
>
> On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>
> # # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your
> aliases #
>
> ProxyPass "/bb" ! ProxyPass "/tt" !
This works now. Thanks
>>
I'm going to do a bit of trimming here:
On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
# # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your
aliases #
ProxyPass "/bb" ! ProxyPass "/tt" !
>>> This works now. Thanks
# # Also this would be a good idea to prevent TomEE
On 7/24/2016 11:33 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 7/24/2016 5:10 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016 2:57
On 7/24/2016 5:10 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
>> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Paul,
On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>
On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Paul,
On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat wh
On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
deployed. Thank you ver
On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
>>> deployed. Thank you very much!!!
>>> A few things that still need correcti
On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> > http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
> > deployed. Thank you very much!!!
>
> > A few things that still need correction...
>
> > Not all my webpages/servlets are h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is
> deployed. Thank you very much!!!
>
> A few things that still need correction...
>
> Not all my webpages/servlets are https, just on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
On 7/22/16 4:24 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/22/2016 4:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> You can even use either HTTP or AJP as the protocol to connect
>> httpd -> Tomcat. I would recommend mod_proxy_http just because
>> it's basically the
On 7/23/2016 4:12 AM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading
>>> >the ajp documentation.
>>> >Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message.
>>> >==
On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote:
I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading
>the ajp documentation.
>Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message.
>==
I'd also suggest setting proxyName and proxyPort on your connector so
>>> >> that any links generated by your application don't try and bypass
>>> >> the proxy (see:
>>> >> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Common_Att
>> the proxy (see:
>> >> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Common_Attr
>> ibutes).
>>
>> >>
>> Don't know what AJP is. Therefore I assume it is not in use. If my
>> > understand of AJP is correct, based on a 5
xyPort on your connector so
> >> that any links generated by your application don't try and bypass
> >> the proxy (see:
> >> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Common_Attr
> ibutes).
>
> >>
> Don't know what AJP is. There
s://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/http.html#Common_Attr
ibutes).
>
>>
Don't know what AJP is. Therefore I assume it is not in use. If my
> understand of AJP is correct, based on a 5 minute read on
> Wikipedia, I only have one server so there is no value in AJP for
t Users List
>>> Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>>> I am trying to install the mod_
On 22.07.2016 09:18, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>Paul
On 7/21/2016 2:21 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host TomEE
>> (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the same
>> server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this.
> TomEE can run outside of a web s
> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host TomEE
> (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the same
> server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this.
TomEE can run outside of a web server (its it's on web container), but
Bugzilla a
Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host
TomEE (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the
same server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this. It is
also my understanding that I needed mod_jk to have the httpd route to
TomEE (Tomcat
Is there some reason that you can't use mod_proxy_balancer instead of
mod_cluster (if you don't want to be vulnerable to the known CVEs)? I
assume that you're looking for some specific logic offered by
mod_cluster, but since you're considering mod_jk I'm not so sure. If
you're going to learn to bui
I can not use mod_cluster. I was having some issues and posted this
(https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/91235/module-mod_proxy_balancer-is-loaded-it-must-be-removed-in-order-for-mod_proxy_cluster-to-function-properly/)
question on the Fedora forums.
See the reply I got below.
Please, *do n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul,
On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68
> (TomEE) server.
>
> I am reading this
> https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html
>
>
documentation whi
I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68 (TomEE)
server.
I am reading this
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html
documentation which points to this
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi download page. But
there is no binary download
s has already been answered, but I couldn't find
>>> it.
>>>
>>> I'm looking at using tomcat in a docker container and I was
>>> wondering why there isn't a binary distribution that has most /
>>> all of the steps already done from the securit
as wondering
> >why
> >there isn't a binary distribution that has most / all of the steps
> >already
> >done from the security how to?
> >https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-howto.html
> >
> >I understand that there wouldn't be a tru
On 23 July 2015 15:07:01 CEST, Jim Sellers wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>Sorry if this has already been answered, but I couldn't find it.
>
>I'm looking at using tomcat in a docker container and I was wondering
>why
>there isn't a binary distribution that has most / all
Hi all.
Sorry if this has already been answered, but I couldn't find it.
I'm looking at using tomcat in a docker container and I was wondering why
there isn't a binary distribution that has most / all of the steps already
done from the security how to?
https://tomcat.apache.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 6/20/13 3:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/06/2013 19:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Once you have set up the environment for
>> CATALINA_HOME/CATALINA_BASE, it's fairly simple to upgrade to a
>> new version of Tomcat:
>>
>> 1. Install
Hi Bernd,
Am 20.06.2013 18:45, schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
Hi,
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running Tomcat 5.5,
which was provided as a rpm from the distributor.
Our developers need now a more current version, 6 or prefered 7.
I didn't find rpm's for these versions fo
On 20/06/2013 19:22, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Bernd,
>
> On 6/20/13 12:45 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running
>> Tomcat 5.5, which was provided as a rpm from the distributor. Our
>> developers need now a more current version, 6 or p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bernd,
On 6/20/13 12:45 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running
> Tomcat 5.5, which was provided as a rpm from the distributor. Our
> developers need now a more current version, 6 or prefered
50.000
zł
From: Lentes, Bernd [bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 18:45
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: binary distribution - how to upgrade ?
Hi,
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, runni
Hi,
i'm fairly new to tomcat. We have a SLES 10 SP4 64bit host, running Tomcat 5.5,
which was provided as a rpm from the distributor.
Our developers need now a more current version, 6 or prefered 7.
I didn't find rpm's for these versions for my OS. So i have to install the
binary version from th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dunnlow,
On 4/21/2011 11:20 AM, dunnlow wrote:
> The jar tomcat-jdbc.jar (from http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/)
> seems to be what I need. HOWEVER, I am concerned that this .jar is outside
> the normal apache tomcat distributi
omcat code outside of normal distribution (from
contributors)?
Barry, let's move this conversation to the other thread (the initial one) I was
hoping to get feedback here regarding using code from Apache for tomcat outside
of the normal delivery. (and yes, I'd like to start using th
.org
> Subject: RE: How safe is using Tomcat code outside of normal distribution
> (from contributors)?
>
>
> Yes, it's the thin client for jdk 1.6
>
>
> Propes, Barry L wrote:
>>
>> Is that more current than the 14_g version?
>>
>>
>>
ormal distribution (from
contributors)?
Yes, it's the thin client for jdk 1.6
Propes, Barry L wrote:
>
> Is that more current than the 14_g version?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, A
e.org
> Subject: RE: How safe is using Tomcat code outside of normal distribution
> (from contributors)?
>
>
> yes (ojdbc6.jar to be exact)
>
>
> Propes, Barry L wrote:
>>
>> Dunlow, do you also have the oracle jar?
>>
>> ojdbc14_g.jar?
>>
Is that more current than the 14_g version?
-Original Message-
From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:56 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: How safe is using Tomcat code outside of normal distribution (from
contributors)?
yes (ojdbc6.jar
che.org
> Subject: How safe is using Tomcat code outside of normal distribution
> (from contributors)?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> (This questions spun off of my old question
> http://old.nabble.com/Why-can%27t-Tomcat-find-class-org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool-DataSourceFactory--td314412
Dunlow, do you also have the oracle jar?
ojdbc14_g.jar?
-Original Message-
From: dunnlow [mailto:dunn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:20 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: How safe is using Tomcat code outside of normal distribution (from
contributors)?
Hi
that this .jar is outside
the normal apache tomcat distribution.
The jar seems very useful, so I assume there is some reason it is not rolled
into the distribution.
Question: How safe (/common) is it to use code from contributors apache
sites in a production system?
Thanks for any insight
2010/8/25 Clifton, Matthew R (AS) :
> Just performed a download on the 6.0.29 version of the software, and
> after performing a Sophos Anti-virus scan found the following four files
> to be corrupt: dso-dlfcn.o, locks.o, replace.o, signals.o. These files
> were found within the commons-daemon-nati
Hello,
Just performed a download on the 6.0.29 version of the software, and
after performing a Sophos Anti-virus scan found the following four files
to be corrupt: dso-dlfcn.o, locks.o, replace.o, signals.o. These files
were found within the commons-daemon-native.tar.gz for the
apache-tomcat-6.0.
> From: SRamasamy [mailto:su...@techie.com]
> Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>
> Tomcat have service name and also its configured with server.xml
The name configured in server.xml and the Windows service name are completely
independent. The Win
to take tomcat pid on windows on command
prombt?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/how-to-find-tomcat-binary-distribution-service-name-tp26329176p26349576.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
> From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
> Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>
> if i use tomcat binary version start startup.bat how to find tomcat
> wheter tomcat is stated or not ?
Send Tomcat an HTTP request with a wget program. Versions exis
how to find tomcat wheter
tomcat is stated or not ?
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
>> Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>>
>>
>> if want to do through command prompt using "net sta
> From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
> Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>
>
> if want to do through command prompt using "net start"
> user need admin rights to start install ?
I believe that is true for all methods of starting
Thanks for your reply, if want to do through command prompt using "net start"
user need admin rights.
to start install ?
o
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
>> From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
>> Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>
> From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
> Subject: RE: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>
> please let me know how to start through service.bat
As previously stated, the service.bat script only installs (or removes) the
Tomcat service. To start the serv
Re: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>>
>> I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am
>> starting through startup.bat file
>
> Then you're not running it as a service, so there is no service name. If
> you want to install
SRama wrote:
Thanks for your reply
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am starting
through startup.bat file
Ok then, you are not running Tomcat as a service, you are running it
from a command window.
That is a good reason why you do not find its name in the
> From: SRama [mailto:su...@techie.com]
> Subject: Re: how to find tomcat binary distribution service name
>
> I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am
> starting through startup.bat file
Then you're not running it as a service, so there is no s
Thanks for your reply
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am starting
through startup.bat file
awarnier wrote:
>
> SRama wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>> I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution),
> there are two (a zip and an exe). whic
Thanks for your reply
I am using binary distribution tomcat and zip format, and also I am starting
through startup.bat file
awarnier wrote:
>
> SRama wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>> I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution),
> there are two (a zip and an exe). whic
SRama wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution),
there are two (a zip and an exe). which one did you install ?
tomcat working fine here I would
like to find tomcat service name, When I try to find through taskmanager
ah! you are under Windows. Good to know.
it
will not
Hi Guys,
I am using tomcat v6 (binary distribution), tomcat working fine here I would
like to find tomcat service name, When I try to find through taskmanager it
will not showing anything related to tomcat but it showing only java.exe,
please let me know how to find corresponding tomcat service
ed as CVE-2009-3548.
Mark
>
> David Norheim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like someone's opinion on the following issue that we have
>> discovered using the windows distribution of Tomcat 6. (tested for
>> Tomcat 6.0.14, 6.0.16 and 6.0.20 downloaded from [1] )
&
Thanks Chris, I'm now just pointing the appBase to an empty directory and
everything looks great. A lot easier than reorganizing my server setup.
Although I do agree with everyone that that approach (each Host has it's own
dir) is more *correct* the complexity of it just too much for my
organizati
Jonathan Mast wrote:
/
--/webapps
-/host_
---/
Is it not more like
server
-- Host1
--webapps
-- manager
-- your app 1
-- your app 2
-- others
-- Host2
--webapps
-- manager
-- your app3 (maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
On 11/2/2009 2:37 PM, Jonathan Mast wrote:
> By nightmare I meant complexity. Currently all my webapps are located in a
> single directory, its flat, it only contains webapps (IE. folders with a
> WEB-INF directory). I have approximately a
By nightmare I meant complexity. Currently all my webapps are located in a
single directory, its flat, it only contains webapps (IE. folders with a
WEB-INF directory). I have approximately a dozen Hosts defined across 3
domain names (and every intention of adding more). Some Hosts have single
Co
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Jonathan Mast
wrote:
> So you are saying each Host *must* have it's own distinct appBase.
Not "must", but that's the easy/simple/standard way to do it, and of
course you're free to complicate your life in any number of ways by
fighting it. :-)
> That
> sucks, doi
> From: Jonathan Mast [mailto:jhmast.develo...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat Manager sees distribution directories as
> applications
>
> So you are saying each Host *must* have it's own distinct appBase.
> That sucks, doing that will make my deployment process a nightmar
So you are saying each Host *must* have it's own distinct appBase. That
sucks, doing that will make my deployment process a nightmare. Any way
around the problem I described above?
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Hassan Schroeder <
hassan.schroe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Jonathan Mast
wrote:
> My reading of the Tomcat config docs seemed to indicate that each Host
> should have it's own Manager Context defined as opposed to having a single
> Manager instance that can span multiple Hosts. Is this correct?
Yes, and its own appBase.
OK I just added the appBase attr to a Host in my server.xml. It did get rid
of the Tomcat install. folders showing up as webapps, but it isnt' doing
exactly what I thought it would do. Now everything in my appBase shows up
in my Manager instance as belonging to that Host, when what I want there i
You're right, I totally forgot to put appBase attributes in my Host
declarations. However, httpd only lets *.jsp and *.do requests pass on to
Tomcat so I don't have to worry about the security issue.
I'm gonna put appBase attributes into my config and see if that fixes it.
thanks
On Fri, Oct 30
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hassan,
On 10/30/2009 5:07 PM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Mast
> wrote:
>> When I log into the Tomcat Web Application Manager, in addition to the
>> actual webapps defined in server.xml, it also lists the /bin
I think it must be because all the webapps except the manager webapp is
actually located outside of tomcat's dir (its in httpd's directory).
Its too late in the day for the sanitization needed with my server.xml, but
I think the cause is the dir issue above.
thanks
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:07 P
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Mast
wrote:
> When I log into the Tomcat Web Application Manager, in addition to the
> actual webapps defined in server.xml, it also lists the /bin, /conf, /logs,
> /temp, /lib and /work directories of the Tomcat installation as if they are
> webapps.
>
>
When I log into the Tomcat Web Application Manager, in addition to the
actual webapps defined in server.xml, it also lists the /bin, /conf, /logs,
/temp, /lib and /work directories of the Tomcat installation as if they are
webapps.
I doubt this is correct, so how do I fix it?
thanks,
Tomcat 6 (
at we have
discovered using the windows distribution of Tomcat 6. (tested for
Tomcat 6.0.14, 6.0.16 and 6.0.20 downloaded from [1] )
The documentation for Tomcat 6 states
It would be quite unsafe to ship Tomcat with default settings that
allowed anyone on the Internet to execute the Manager appl
Hi,
I would like someone's opinion on the following issue that we have
discovered using the windows distribution of Tomcat 6. (tested for
Tomcat 6.0.14, 6.0.16 and 6.0.20 downloaded from [1] )
The documentation for Tomcat 6 states
It would be quite unsafe to ship Tomcat with de
etenv.sh|bat file.
> The problem is that there is NO setenv.sh
> file in the distribution itself, so there is nothing to be copied over.
Correct. It is an optional file that you create it you need it.
> Then I tried to run the thing without any files copied over in the "bin"
>
er into the new instance, and one of the
lines reads:
line 109:
---
* bin - Only setenv.sh (*nix) and setenv.bat (windows)
---
So it tells us that the "bin" folder must be created with only
"setenv.sh" file copied over. The problem is that there is NO
setenv
Hi Steve,
CentOs had troubles with Dell blade video card and ACPI functions.
Sorry, I can't be more precise because it was quite a time ago.
Maybe, the problem was around dell server...isn't it!!
Steve Ochani wrote:
On 14 Nov 2007 at 22:58, Lionel Crine wrote:
another distr
> From: Warren Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Point taken. We ran a Vax until last year...
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 10:52 AM, Steve Ochani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If everyone based their decisions solely on that criteria
> > we would be all using pdp-11s.
[...]
I think some companies are rath
> Unfortunately too many IT teams that I've encountered tend towards the "Ooh,
> shiny new toy!" and "My server's newer than your server" views of the world.
Heh heh, shiny new toy syndrome, where would the 'IT business' be without it.
comp.lang.java.programmer has some really bilious postings
> And that is the correct answer.
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2007 5:54 AM, Peter Crowther
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server
> >
Agreed!
At 06:19 AM 11/15/2007, you wrote:
And that is the correct answer.
On Nov 15, 2007 5:54 AM, Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
> > a
le [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server
> with
> > > an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
> >
> > The one with which your organisation already has experience.
> Familiarity
And that is the correct answer.
On Nov 15, 2007 5:54 AM, Peter Crowther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
> > an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application
> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In your opinion what is the best LINUX distribution for a server with
> an instance of Tomcat and an J2EE application of medium load?
The one with which your organisation already has experience. Familiarity and
ease of admin is
I believe Oracle Corporation has an Oracle Enterprise Linux which you
can download for free. They charge you for support however.
Ed
On 11/14/07, Steve Ochani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 Nov 2007 at 22:58, Lionel Crine wrote:
>
>
> > another distribution to know.
On 14 Nov 2007 at 22:58, Lionel Crine wrote:
> another distribution to know. You have some support. Fedora : Well,
> stable, recent packages CentOS : too many bugs when I was using it (1
> year ago).
You must be mixing up Fedora and CentOS. CentOS has always been rock solid
stabl
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
