On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Josh, what is common sense now becomes ancient history when the newest
> theories come out.
>
Yes, I know that happens sometimes. And sometimes things that are common
sense remain common sense.
But I think you misunderstood. I was not re
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
> without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical point
> at which the temperature must be reduced depends on the degree of thermal
> contact between
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> As dave explains it makes sense if the energy input provides cooling power.
>
>
>
Exactly. The whole thing is nuts. If it really needed to be regulated, it
would make sense to regulate with temperature controlled cooling.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> If we are going to do analogies, a more useful one would be to compare the
> Rossi reactor to an internal combustion engine ICE. With an ICE you have to
> apply the spark periodically to small portions of the fuel to trigger the
> reaction.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:23 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> There seems to be a serious hangup over why a heat generating device needs
> some form of heating input to sustain itself. The skeptics can not seem to
> get their arms around this issue so I will make another short attempt to
> explain wh
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Joshua Cude wrote:
>
> A match is needed to ignite a firecracker, but once ignited, the
>> explosion sustains itself.
>>
>>
>> A match is needed to start a campfire, but not to sustain it.
>>
>
> Cold fusion is not fire. It does not w
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not talking about initiating. I'm talking about sustaining. I have no
>> problem using electricity to initiate the ecat. But if it's a source of
>> energy, it should behave l
I asked Ed to try to find another keyword for precisely that reason.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
> What is a Hydroton? I googled the term and all I could find
> were references to a clay-based plant growing medium much prized by
> marijuana growers ...
>
> [mg]
>
> On Thu
What is a Hydroton? I googled the term and all I could find were references
to a clay-based plant growing medium much prized by marijuana growers ...
[mg]
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Harry, imagine bal
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Mark Gibbs wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>>
>> I suspect "hand waving" began as a derisive reference to occult
>> activities since these might involve the waving of hands and/or a wand. .
>>
>
> You would be completely wrong. In
How dipole concentration and charge separation disrupt atomic processes.
Part one
the discovery of the Oklo natural nuclear reactor
This post will explore the subject of naturally-occurring nuclear fission
reactions, focusing on the reactors of Gabon, Africa, which were
operational approximatel
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> Harry, imagine balls held in line by springs. If the end ball is pull away
> with a force and let go, a resonance wave will pass down the line. Each
> ball will alternately move away and then toward its neighbor. If outside
> energy is suppl
Axil,
Thanks for the reference; yes, I've scanned it and it is of interest.
"Charge and dipoles shapes the vacuum and also the speed that light travels
through it."
And that 'shaping' of the vacuum is what we know of as E and B 'fields'. and
I would bet that the B field is perpendicular to th
The quantum vacuum as the origin of the speed of light :
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.6165.pdf
- Mark
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:31 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A sum rule for charged elementary particles
http://csglobe.com/new-research-shows-the-speed-of-light-is-varia
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
> I suspect "hand waving" began as a derisive reference to occult
> activities since these might involve the waving of hands and/or a wand. .
>
You would be completely wrong. In fact, that is perhaps the most ridiculous
conclusion anyone has
http://csglobe.com/new-research-shows-the-speed-of-light-is-variable-in-real-space/
New Research Shows the Speed of Light is Variable in Real Space
Two new studies to be published in the European Physical Journal D
demonstrate that the speed of light is variable in real space. Textbook
explanatio
NRL has and others have done work with zeolites.
The silica gel that Patterson used was not added to the powder but the Ni was
reduced as it was contained in the material.
With C, silica, zeolite,... the idea is to "grow" the Ni within the pores of
the material and thus limit it size.
D
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.3923v1.pdf
A sum rule for charged elementary particles
This paper draws a connection between charge and the behavior of the vacuum
in a region.
Charge and dipoles shapes the vacuum and also the speed that light travels
through it.
Increase the charge in a vacuu
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> If we abandon this rule, or if we call it "hand waving" as Gibbs does
>> here, progress in science will come to a halt.
>>
>
> I think there's been a simple misunderstanding of terms.
I think this is more about who is the gatekeeper to the ideology and
business of science rather than any exercise in ethics.
The gatekeeper class resents this clique of stiff necked maverick
scientists who have the temerity to violate the status quo and defies the
picking order in their professio
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
If we abandon this rule, or if we call it "hand waving" as Gibbs does here,
> progress in science will come to a halt.
>
I think there's been a simple misunderstanding of terms. As an amateur
anthropologist of scientists, I gather that "hand
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
If we are going to do analogies, a more useful one would be to compare the
> Rossi reactor to an internal combustion engine ICE. With an ICE you have to
> apply the spark periodically to small portions of the fuel to trigger the
> reaction. Cud
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Randy wuller wrote:
**
> My speculation is that based on this report the scientific community will
> likely pay more attention to the developments in this area and will await
> further testing and other disclosures before taking active steps to
> investigate. So
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Teslaalset wrote:
I wonder whether silica would do the job to prevent sintering of Ni (powder
> or layered on top)
>
In a related connection, there are some very interesting experiments
involving zeolite substrates (microporous aluminosilicate minerals), with
pall
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering ... Everything I read in
> the 29 page report, and following challenges as answered by the authors,
> seems extremely convincing. All objections, typically suggesting fraud, are
> not to me at
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:51 PM, wrote:
> More interesting is when the electron is at "perigee"
Clearly this is based on the Bohr model, obsolete; but, could you
explain a bit more?! :)
If you believe in Puthoff's explanation for the non-radiating
electron, there is a rapid exchange occurring
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
> I don't buy it. The reactor is a sealed faraday cage, so it's not going to
> care about ripple or dc vs ac. It's just a thermal interface.
The reactor might require or might be incompatible with low-frequency AC
magnetic fields, which can go
I notice that in the pictures they are twisted pairs; could it be a
"transmission line".
--On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:57 PM -0400 David L Babcock
wrote:
If plenty of power is available, and stringent RF interference specs
don't need to be met, the simple wires will work fine.
But I must
What if LENR = dark/vacuum energy = http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4507
On Thursday, May 30, 2013, Axil Axil wrote:
> Big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory, together with the precise WMAP
> cosmic baryon density, makes tight predictions for the abundances of the
> lightest elements.
>
>
>
> Deuterium
This is not a quantum mechanical model. The actual wavefunction for anjy n,
l=0 is spherical.
2013/5/30 Axil Axil
> To my best understanding, in energetic hydrogen the electron orbits move
> further away from the nucleus, not closer.
>
> * *
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sommerfeld_elli
To my best understanding, in energetic hydrogen the electron orbits move
further away from the nucleus, not closer.
* *
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sommerfeld_ellipses.svg
Quantum mechanically a state with abnormally high *n* refers to an atom in
which the valence electron(s) have been e
Claudio C Fiorini wrote:
> In the Levi report, the test started 13 of december and ended 17 of
> december. This is compatible with this article. Maybe, it was decided later
> to continue the test after december 15.
>
> This confirms (by the published picture), that during the ongoing
> experimen
Big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory, together with the precise WMAP
cosmic baryon density, makes tight predictions for the abundances of the
lightest elements.
Deuterium and 4He measurements agree well with expectations, but 7Li
observations lie a factor 3 - 4 below the BBN+WMAP prediction. Th
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 30 May 2013 07:38:13 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Are you sure? Maybe not a plasma; but, possibly close. DGT
>speculates that highly energized hydrogen has the electron in a
>extreme elliptical orbit and, when at its apogee, the nucleus is
>"exposed" for a brief
According to an article in the swiss journal "NET Journal" that has been
published earlier in february 2013, a group of business partners of Andrea
Rossi visited his "new laboratory" in Ferrara the day 14 of december 2012.
The group saw the ongoing experiment and could take some pictures. The
pictu
> From: "Alain Sepeda"
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 2:07:34 PM
> thanks for the reminding.
> I should not have read AE van Vogt books when teenager...
> I would be mainstream and happy.
Or Jack Vance, who just died aged 96 :
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/may/30/jack-vance-dies-96-scien
If someone is looking for an analogy they could look at the behavior of a power
transistor mounted on a heat sink. For this exercise assume that the collector
is directly connected to a power source. Apply enough base drive to obtain a
relatively large collector current.
If you adjust the
David Roberson wrote:
> Josh, what is common sense now becomes ancient history when the newest
> theories come out. . . .
>
> You need to realize that all knowledge does not reside within your
> understanding. All of us should be open to learning new concepts and it is
> about time for you to
thanks for the reminding.
I should not have read AE van Vogt books when teenager...
I would be mainstream and happy.
2013/5/30 Berke Durak
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jed Rothwell
> wrote:
> > That is completely wrong. In experimental science you never need to
> explain
> > how somethin
The COP will be higher outside on a wintery windy night.
Harry
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
> without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical point
> at which the temperature m
By "Tomorrow" one presumes he means "tomorrow" in the literary sense.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Here is a comment at Forbes from someone who sounds like he should be
> working on cold fusion with the rest of the superannuated geezers. Let's
> see if we can find him.
Josh, what is common sense now becomes ancient history when the newest theories
come out. How do you think men learned to fly heavier than air crafts when it
was common sense that this was not possible. It took a couple of open minded
and brilliant engineers to do what could not be done by th
I agree Dave, I have been providing this explanation for several years
without any effect. I'm glad you are adding your voice. The critical
point at which the temperature must be reduced depends on the degree
of thermal contact between the source of energy (the Ni powder) and
the sink (The
There are advantages to using a three phase power input that have been pointed
out. Measurements of 3 phase systems are done every day so this is not
important.
If Cude can show a real test that proves 3 phase measurements are not accurate,
then someone will listen. Until that time, he can g
As dave explains it makes sense if the energy input provides cooling power.
Harry
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>
>> . . . If you unplug a Rossi cell and try to make it self-sustain without
>> input, it will melt.
>>
>> An analogy to fire may be useful to un
I thought that the DC issue was put to rest. It can be easily shown that there
is not amount of diode trickery which can be put into the control box that will
confuse the primary power measurement. DC input has been eliminated so that is
not an issue due to direct observation by one or more o
Cold fusion seems to bring out the crazies. They do not think
rationally and they do not understand basic science, yet they are sure
they are right. I'm glad you are trying to keep them close to
reality. Your patience is amazing.
Ed Storms
On May 30, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I wrote:
> . . . If you unplug a Rossi cell and try to make it self-sustain without
> input, it will melt.
>
> An analogy to fire may be useful to understanding, but you cannot engineer
> a reactor based on analogies.
>
If we are going to do analogies, a more useful one would be to compare the
R
There seems to be a serious hangup over why a heat generating device needs some
form of heating input to sustain itself. The skeptics can not seem to get
their arms around this issue so I will make another short attempt to explain
why this is important.
To achieve a high value of COP the ECAT
Joshua Cude mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com>> wrote:
A match is needed to ignite a firecracker, but once ignited, the
explosion sustains itself.
A match is needed to start a campfire, but not to sustain it.
Cold fusion is not fire. It does not work the same way. Evidently,
Rossi's
New Q & A Between Nextme.it and Andrea Rossi
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/new-q-a-between-nextme-it-and-andrea-rossi/comment-page-1/
Below is a Q & A from the Journal of Nuclear Physics. The questions were
submitted by Roberta De Carolis from the Italian web site NextMe.it and
answered by A
William Beaty wrote:
> Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.
>>
>
> It was temporary, but may be permanent.
Well, it isn't for me to tell you how to run things but . . .
I hope you issue a polite warning before you ban someone. As you said,
perhaps he did not read the ru
On Wed, 29 May 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Whoa! That seems precipitous. He did not seem so bad to me.
It was temporary, but may be permanent. Crackpot or no, if someone simply
cannot lower themselves to obeying the one basic rule here, and absolutely
will not apologize or even admit to slight
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
> I'm not talking about initiating. I'm talking about sustaining. I have no
> problem using electricity to initiate the ecat. But if it's a source of
> energy, it should behave like one and be able to at least power itself.
>
>
> A match is ne
Alan Fletcher wrote:
> > The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
>
> Gee .. I'd better take my Electric clothes dryer in for de-obfuscating.
>
> And there I was thinking it was trapped lint.
>
That's hilarious!
> You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase. This is a test r
> From: "Joshua Cude"
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:16:19 PM
> The paper says they *replaced* the triac with a control box.
OK -- in fig 6 (Dec) they show a blue-and-yellow CONTROL box and three triacs.
They don't have a picture for March, so we don't know if it includes the
functionality
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> > From: "Joshua Cude"
> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:44:00 AM
>
> >> You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase.
> >
> > Right, but I thought the ecat was supposed to provide the lots of
> > power.
>
> Of THERMAL power, yes
Here is a comment at Forbes from someone who sounds like he should be
working on cold fusion with the rest of the superannuated geezers. Let's
see if we can find him.
- Jed
DONALD ANDERSON
I’m a Professor Ameritus in Electrical Engineering, Ph.D. was in developing
long-lived vacuum tubes with ni
> From: "Joshua Cude"
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:44:00 AM
>> You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase.
>
> Right, but I thought the ecat was supposed to provide the lots of
> power.
Of THERMAL power, yes, not of ELECTRICAL power.
> They *changed* the power for the Dec an
If you remember this thread as follows:
* *
Entangled proton pairs show enhanced tunneling – 1/31/12
Why do entangled proton pairs pass through the coulomb barrier of a heavy
element nucleus with high probability in collisions with energies well
below those required to breach this barrier?
Edmund Storms wrote:
Mark, why don't you ask and quote some who actually understand cold fusion,
> like myself?
>
Well, Ed, at least he quoted Elforsk. That's progress! The people Elforsk
do not understand cold fusion but they do understand electricity, IR
cameras, and the Stefan-Boltzmann law,
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> > From: "Joshua Cude"
> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:38:17 AM
>
> > The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
>
> Gee .. I'd better take my Electric clothes dryer in for de-obfuscating.
>
> And there I was thinking it was trapped
Cude:
You seem to be morphing into troll mode. Reasonable discussions with you are
apparently at an end.
Ransom
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Cude
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ethics of the E-Cat investigation put into q
Gibbs responded to my comment, and I responded back, as follows:
MG:
You completely miss my point … Ruby’s argument dimisses Ethan’s argument by
simply saying “you’re wrong” and citing experimental evidence that isn’t
accepted outside of the LENR community. You’re right, experiment trumps
theory
Hi,
On 30-5-2013 20:15, Alan Fletcher wrote:
From: "Joshua Cude"
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:38:17 AM
The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase. This is a test rig he's
using, so of course it's over-engineered. When you've finis
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
>
>
> > A device with a COP of 3 is not better than a heat pump.
>
> That's for MARCH, which was intentionally run at lower power, choosing
> stability over COP.
>
Right. Three months of technical "improvements" gave a worse COP.
>
> The De
I should probably point out that Norman Ramsey had to threaten to resign as
co-chair from the DoE panel if they did not include that in the preamble.
Clearly Ramsey saw what Charles P. Beaudette has has documented in "Excess
Heat":
The 5 week rush to judgement after the March 1989 press conferenc
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> From: "Joshua Cude"
> > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:12:17 AM
>
> > And didn't
> > the engineers at the Swedish Standards Institute test this
> > configuration without success. Have those engineers given an opinion
> > on the latest te
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Randy wuller wrote:
> **
> Joshua:
>
>
> First, telling us how the majority of observers feel about the report is
> clearly beyond your knowledge. As Eric suggested making those claims
> without proof (poll, census, etc.) is not only unscientific it is
> undoubt
Mark, why don't you ask and quote some who actually understand cold
fusion, like myself? I realize you consider me a believer. However,
have you considered why I have this belief? It is not based on my
imagination or on a pathology. It is based on the fact that I have
read and studied all o
> From: "Joshua Cude"
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:38:17 AM
> The 3-phase looks more like obfuscation to me.
Gee .. I'd better take my Electric clothes dryer in for de-obfuscating.
And there I was thinking it was trapped lint.
You want lots of power, you go straight to three-phase. This
> From: "Joshua Cude"
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:13:43 AM
> I have not seen perfectly good reasons for it. The reasons given that
> you need input heat to control the heat seem like an excuse to keep
> the power connected to me. Is there another example of a reaction
> triggered by heat th
From: "Joshua Cude"
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:12:17 AM
> And didn't
> the engineers at the Swedish Standards Institute test this
> configuration without success. Have those engineers given an opinion
> on the latest test? They know more than me too.
They terminated the test because Ross
Joshua:
You make that point all the time. It is one of your favorites, but it is
really unsupported speculation and not worth considering.
First, telling us how the majority of observers feel about the report is
clearly beyond your knowledge. As Eric suggested making those claims without
pro
As Norman Ramsey pointed out in his preamble to the DoE's original review
of cold fusion: "However, even a *single* short but valid cold fusion
period would be revolutionary."
We are so far beyond that benchmark as to render Mark's criterion absurd.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Ruby wrote:
No Alan, no relationship exist between my model and the one proposed
by Peter. You need to read the two ideas more carefully. I wish a
relationship existed, but sadly it does not. The cluster Peter
proposes to form does not occur in the same place in the material as
the Hydroton, it does n
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:02 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
> Eric/JC:
> I've read the report twice fully, and a few other times only to verify a
> specific statement.
>
> I still did not catch the significance that it was the output of the
> control
> box that was changed from 3ph to 1ph, not the inp
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Berke Durak wrote:
> > In fact I said the 3-phase input to the box was particularly unnecessary
> *because* only single-phase was used for the box.
>
> There are legitimate reasons to prefer 3-phase input. If the output
> of the control box is a pulse width-modul
Mark Gibbs writes:
"You completely miss my point ... Ruby's argument dimisses Ethan's
argument by simply saying "you're wrong" and citing experimental
evidence that isn't accepted outside of the LENR community. You're
right, experiment trumps theory but only when you have an experiment
that c
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
>
>> But when they use 3-phase, when single would do, when the wiring is in
>> place ahead of time, when close associates chose the instruments which are
>> completely inadequate, when the
Yes, thank you Mark. I agree with Jed.
Mark Gibbs is wrong in his reasoning
It should be clear that there are experimental results that have no
confirmed model to explain them.
This is the history of revolutionary science, which Gibbs should be
aware of.
On 5/30/13 8:27 AM, MarkI-Zer
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> ** **
>
> *From:* Joshua Cude
>
> ** **
>
> First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more
> dense than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less)
> will turn most observers away.
>
> ** **
There seems to be some convergence between Ed's theory and Hagelstein's
proposal of lossy resonance as a way to get energy out of the fused
nuclei in smaller quanta.
Hagelstein also has a significant patent for a phonon laser (US7411445)
that may have some relevance to hydroton behavior.
A wor
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Eric Walker wrote:
>
>>
>> First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more
>>> dense than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less)
>>> will turn most observers away.
>>>
>>
>> Fine, so "most observe
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
> First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more dense
>> than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less) will
>> turn most observers away.
>>
>
> F
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
>
> The engineers at Elforsk disagree with Cude. They do not think this was a
> farce. They know much more about measuring energy and electricity than he
> does, so I suppose they are correct and he is wrong.
>
>
It doesn't really matter to m
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
> That's not the opinion of the majority of observers of the case. Deception
>> on this scale -- frauds and scams -- are utterly common. Scientific
>> revolutions like this are very rare, e
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> You probably know the famous saying "First they ignore you, then they
> ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win".
> It seems we are currently in the second stage and my "instinct" tells me
> we might soon be entering the ne
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Joshua Cude wrote:
>
>>
>>
> The monitoring of the input was comically inadequate, if there is any
>> possibility of deception, the blank run used a different power regimen, the
>> claims of power density 100 t
Dear Friends,
Endless discussions re the Professors Hot Cat Report; I repeat it shows
real excess heat. I wanted just to add a few ideas and a prediction for
which I am responsible and accountable, see:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/05/lenr-frontline-report-undecided-battle.html
Very truly
Yes Eric I can, but only in terms of my theory. As you know, I believe
small gaps are required that are created by stress relief. So, what
would Rossi have to react Ni with to create stress in the surface? The
reaction would have to result in a compound having a high melting
point, low sint
> From: "Bob Higgins"
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:27:51 AM
> The ends were cone-shaped AISI 316 steel caps that were
> "hot-hammered" into the ends. I don't think they were welded.
>
> This "hot-hammering" of the cone-shaped insert is a description of a
> type of cold welding. Cold welding
On 5/30/2013 9:00 AM, Barrera, Joseph wrote:
On 5/30/2013 8:27 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
it was Gibbs’ statement after it which was:
“Unfortunately that’s not a sound argument…”
Gibbs did not write that. Jed did.
- Joe
Sorry, never mind, I was looking at the wrong article.
- Joe
On 5/30/2013 8:27 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
it was Gibbs’ statement after it which was:
“Unfortunately that’s not a sound argument…”
Gibbs did not write that. Jed did.
- Joe
Ruby:
I don't think Jed was criticizing your statement,
"Cold fusion has no definitive theory - as yet, but the experimental
evidence is overwhelming: anomalous heat and transmutations can occur within
metallic-hydrides systems contained in small cells that sit on a table-top"
it was Gibb
I wrote that quote...
"Cold fusion has no definitive theory – as yet, but the experimental
evidence is overwhelming: anomalous heat and transmutations can occur
within metallic-hydrides systems contained in small cells that sit on a
table-top"
http://coldfusionnow.org/discovery-news-misinfor
It is amazing that even though the science is still a mystery, there are
increasing levels of engineering advancements building the technology.
Wish I had time to study more
http://coldfusionnow.org/pre-loaded-hydrogen-fuel-an-engineering-answer-for-efficiency-ease-and-safety/
--
Ruby
Harry, imagine balls held in line by springs. If the end ball is pull
away with a force and let go, a resonance wave will pass down the
line. Each ball will alternately move away and then toward its
neighbor. If outside energy is supplied, this resonance will continue.
If not, it will damp
Teslaalse,
I worry that the sintering is a result of oxidizing and
cleaning it that way would destroy the geometry you are trying to retain, I
would think there should be a chemical way to deoxygenate your powder in the
glove and then let it dry in the inert atmosphere. A small
“Recalescence” is very important in
understanding the Rossi effect, so I have removed typos and added to a
previous posting - in order to have this post indexed in the archive.
From: a former commentato
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
