The biggest factor now is the toolbox for SMARTMUSIC that will never
be in Sibelius. As an applied teacher, you need to run, not walk, to
the SMARTMUSIC site and get a license. I was just told that my
Finale2005 is on the loading dock in Minnesota; however, the toolbox
for turning FINALE into S
After many years hiatus from the music biz I am dusting off the old
onion skins and getting back into writing. The last version of
Finale I used in earnest was Finale 98, but I have seen and
experimented with both Finale 2006/2007 and Sibelius 4.xx. I do have
a lot of old music in the Fin
Bob Shuster wrote:
*SO*,
what's the advice? Do I stick with Finale or do the Sibelius
crossgrade? What I have seen of the new Finale - it looks pretty much
the same as Finale 98, except with Aqua-looking buttons and a lot of
consumer-level features added that I'll never use. Sibelius on the
oth
Bob Shuster wrote:
*SO*,
what's the advice? Do I stick with Finale or do the Sibelius
crossgrade? What I have seen of the new Finale - it looks pretty much
the same as Finale 98, except with Aqua-looking buttons and a lot of
consumer-level features added that I'll never use. Sibelius on the
oth
After many years hiatus from the music biz I am dusting off the old onion skins and getting back into writing. The last version of Finale I used in earnest was Finale 98, but I have seen and experimented with both Finale 2006/2007 and Sibelius 4.xx. I do have a lot of old music in the Finale 98 f
On 03.10.2006 Bob Shuster wrote:
*SO*, what's the advice? Do I stick with Finale or do the Sibelius crossgrade?
What I have seen of the new Finale - it looks pretty much the same as Finale
98, except with Aqua-looking buttons and a lot of consumer-level features added
that I'll never use. S
Bob Shuster wrote:
After many years hiatus from the music biz I am dusting off the old
onion skins and getting back into writing. The last version of Finale I
used in earnest was Finale 98, but I have seen and experimented with
both Finale 2006/2007 and Sibelius 4.xx. I do have a lot of old m
On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Bob Shuster wrote:
One other consideration is that I'd *really* like to use the Golden
Age font - however I am confidant that I can modify it for use in
either application.
Golden Age should work fine in Finale, either platform, though you
would have to have the
Bob Shuster wrote:
What I have seen of the new Finale - it looks pretty much the same as
Finale 98, except with Aqua-looking buttons
I can't speak for Sibelius in this regard, but there is the ability in
Finale, to set the "look and feel" to much closer to the way the look
and feel operated in
On Jun 5, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Auto word extensions slow down the Mac version of 2004 something
awful. Taking lyrics into account for music spacing (this has been
part of Finale for a long time, I admit) sometimes gives really odd
results, like if you have a long syllab
Eric wrote:
Lyric tool works well.
to which Mark responded
Really? Lyric tool works well if you know what you're doing, or if
you never do anything complicated, but it has lots of pit-traps that
the unwray can fall into. And there are failings, too, such as
control over hyphen behavior.
prompting
At 7:21 PM -0700 6/05/04, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 5, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
And how do you shift syllables for the second verse without
messing up the first verse? It's true that it is better than it
was, but one still has to be careful, or major screw-ups can occur.
Wow
Christopher BJ Smith wrote, part:
And how do you shift syllables for the second verse without messing up
the first verse?
This is one of the places I'd use the edit lyric's dialog box. It is my
experience that as long as the first syllable of the line of lyric
attached to each staff stays in
On Jun 5, 2004, at 8:18 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
[responding to David Fenton's suggestion]
DON'T USE TYPE INTO SCORE
Once you figure that out, it's pretty easy to use.
which I must say, does not match my experience at all. After several
years of creating choral music in various layout pattern
I wonder how accurate this review is in terms of speed issues. I don't work
with large scores, so it's hard for me to tell.
For the 1st time buyers, Macworld endorses Sibelius. For long time users of
Finale, they don't see a compelling reason for switching to Sibelius, not
that I was even consider
Tools -- options -- Spelling and grammar (and other tabs in this db)
RY
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale vs. Sibelius - Review in Macworld July
2004Issue
> > &g
On Jun 5, 2004, at 5:11 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
[answering Eddy Wilson]
Hey, Aaron, I second and third and fourth what you wrote.
Would
you
please tell me the secret to turning off stuff in MS Word? No one in
my
church office seems to know.
Tools -- options -- Spelling and grammar (and
>>DON'T USE TYPE INTO SCORE<<
Why? In your entire rant about not using type into score, I didn't see a
clear reason why.
Allen
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On 7 Jun 2004 at 12:03, Fisher, Allen wrote:
> >>DON'T USE TYPE INTO SCORE<<
>
> Why? In your entire rant about not using type into score, I didn't see
> a clear reason why.
Rant?
The reason not to use type in score is that it creates a text stream
that doesn't really match the real text being
David W. Fenton wrote:
The reason not to use type in score is that it creates a text stream
that doesn't really match the real text being set *unless* you have
very carefully ordered your typing in a way that will create a
comprehensible text in the actual data store. With click assignment, you
On 7 Jun 2004 at 15:02, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
> David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> >The reason not to use type in score is that it creates a text stream
> >that doesn't really match the real text being set *unless* you have
> >very carefully ordered your typing in a way that will create a
> >comprehens
Where David W. Fenton writes:
But [using type into score] you have to do the entry in the correct order to get the lyrics to come out comprehensibly.
I would suggest instead, that one merely needs to understand how Finale
places syllables in the lyrics area of the data file, in order to be
able
The thing they should work on is linking parts to a score. It's a pain
in the ass to work on something, and have to remember to change the
score and other parts. It would be great to have them linked (if you
wanted) to a score, so, a change in a part would be reflected in the
score, and vice ve
On 04.06.2004 7:36 Uhr, Arkady wrote
> For me Mic Notator is important, and it doesn't exist in Sibelius.
REally? This is the first time I hear of anyone using this. Do you really
input your music with MicNotator successfully?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berol
At 10:42 PM -0700 6/03/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
The thing they should work on is linking parts to a score. It's a
pain in the ass to work on something, and have to remember to change
the score and other parts. It would be great to have them linked (if
you wanted) to a score, so, a change in a p
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
This issue has come up before on this list, and there were a whole
bunch of things discussed that I couldn't understand because I have
little programming experience, but here is my main objection:
What would happen to the layout of the parts when you made a change to
At 11:17 AM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
This issue has come up before on this list, and there were a whole
bunch of things discussed that I couldn't understand because I have
little programming experience, but here is my main objection:
What would happen to t
At 03:47 PM 06/04/2004, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
>I'm still not getting it. If the layout has to change, then why not
>re-extract the part?
This is probably one of those things that comes down to each person's
working habits, but since you asked
When I extract parts, even with Page Layout
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I'm still not getting it. If the layout has to change, then why not
re-extract the part? If you are using Finale's default layout, then
you should be happy, as it is all done automatically. If you are in
the habit of changing the default layout on extracted parts, the
At 2:00 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Layout would probably NOT be linked, but NOTES would. Does that make
sense? I can't count how many times I've changed something in a
score and FORGOT to update it in a part. Re extracting the part
would be way more time consuming. The placement of
On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want my
> notation program to do.
You seem to assume a number of things:
1. layout in the linked part would not be as fully adjustable as
layout in an extracted part.
2. the impl
At 06:55 PM 06/04/2004, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
>For example, I HATE the way Microsoft Word
>makes assumptions about what I want done with my typing, like
>"correcting" my spelling without telling me, or putting bullets or
>numbers when I hit carriage return.
You know you can turn all of that o
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Once again, my little copying routine that I noted is so easy, that I
can hardly imagine justifying the kind of rewriting it would take to
accomplish linking ONLY notes in Finale. And doesn't anyone edit
anything else?
But if you find yourself doing this a LOT, would
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want my
notation program to do.
You seem to assume a number of things:
1. layout in the linked part would not be as fully adjustable as
layout in an extracted
On 4 Jun 2004 at 20:36, dhbailey wrote:
> David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> >
> >>I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want
> >>my notation program to do.
> >
> >
> > You seem to assume a number of things:
> >
> > 1. la
At 7:50 PM -0400 6/04/04, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:55 PM 06/04/2004, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
For example, I HATE the way Microsoft Word
makes assumptions about what I want done with my typing, like
"correcting" my spelling without telling me, or putting bullets or
numbers when I hit carriage
At 7:50 PM -0400 6/04/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want my
notation program to do.
You seem to assume a number of things:
1. layout in the linked part would not be as fully adjustable a
At 5:35 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Once again, my little copying routine that I noted is so easy, that
I can hardly imagine justifying the kind of rewriting it would take
to accomplish linking ONLY notes in Finale. And doesn't anyone edit
anything else?
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 7:50 PM -0400 6/04/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want my
notation program to do.
You seem to assume a number of things:
1. layout in the linked part would
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
You know, this is what I was referring to when I mentioned experienced
programmers seeming to see things that I don't. I don't understand the
term "relational database." Maybe if I did, I would "get" what all you
guys want out of Finale.
Relational databases. See
ht
On Jun 4, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Lyric tool works well.
Really? Lyric tool works well if you know what you're doing, or if you
never do anything complicated, but it has lots of pit-traps that the
unwray can fall into. And there are failings, too, such as control
over hyphen be
At 9:29 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I just think that if you are going to have to re-jig almost every
aspect of your part layout once you change something, why not just
re-extract parts again?
Why do you think that? Say you change 8 measures of music, is th
At 9:29 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Thats like letting Finale print the parts for you. I can't ever
remember doing that and liking the results. It would be great to
keep a score and the parts together in ONE file, and have separate
layouts for each. Then you can change the music, bu
On 5 Jun 2004 at 0:11, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> At 7:50 PM -0400 6/04/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
> >On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> >
> >> I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want
> >> my notation program to do.
> >
> >You seem to assume a num
On 5 Jun 2004 at 0:17, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> At 5:35 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> >Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> >
> >>Once again, my little copying routine that I noted is so easy, that
> >>I can hardly imagine justifying the kind of rewriting it would take
> >>to accomplish
On 4 Jun 2004 at 22:17, Mark D Lew wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>
> > Lyric tool works well.
>
> Really? Lyric tool works well if you know what you're doing, or if
> you never do anything complicated, but it has lots of pit-traps that
> the unwray can fall into. A
On 5 Jun 2004 at 1:34, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> At 9:29 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> >Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>I just think that if you are going to have to re-jig almost every
> >>aspect of your part layout once you change something, why not just
> >>re-extract parts
On 5 Jun 2004 at 1:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> Now comes the hard part: How far away is Finale's structure from a
> relational database to be able to accomplish this in a reasonable
> number of programmer hours?
Finale's data is already stored in a database.
Whether it's truly relational o
At 2:49 PM -0400 6/05/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 5 Jun 2004 at 0:17, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> Well, I have a couple of macros to accomplish it. Mostly I want to
keep control. I re-extract when I see the need, and use the routine I
outlined when it would create less work.
But why do you s
On 5 Jun 2004 at 14:59, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> Did you see my reply enumerating what I thought such a architecture
> should contain? Do you see anything missing?
Yes -- I replied to your earlier messages before reading that.
You described it quite well, I thought.
I'd *love* to have the
At 2:52 PM -0400 6/05/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
But, of course, I thought we were discussing examples of
subcomponents of Finale that were majorly overhauled and then never
worked right any more. When has the Lyrics subsystem been overhauled
and exactly what ended up badly broken?
Auto word extens
At 2:58 PM -0400 6/05/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 5 Jun 2004 at 1:34, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> At 9:29 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> >Why do you think that? Say you change 8 measures of music, is that
>going to screw up the whole page format?
Yes! If you have added notes wher
At 3:04 PM -0400 6/05/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 5 Jun 2004 at 1:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Now comes the hard part: How far away is Finale's structure from a
relational database to be able to accomplish this in a reasonable
number of programmer hours?
Finale's data is already stored in
On 5 Jun 2004 at 15:38, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> At 3:04 PM -0400 6/05/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
> >If find that extracting parts is one of the most unpleasant parts of
> >Finale -- I put it off and put it off, especially because after
> >proofing the first run of them, I always have to go
Thank you! That is what I have been hinting at.
David W. Fenton wrote:
The key distinction between data stored in a spreadsheet and data
stored in a relational database is that the latter separates data
storage from data presentation, whereas in a spreadsheet, the place
where you store the data
At 4:22 PM -0400 6/05/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 5 Jun 2004 at 15:38, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> If the rhythmic content of the measures is not too different, try my
method for copying changes. It really is fast. A whole big band chart
in about ten minutes, I kid you not.
Well, that will w
> >For example, I HATE the way Microsoft Word
> >makes assumptions about what I want done with my typing, like
> >"correcting" my spelling without telling me, or putting bullets or
> >numbers when I hit carriage return.
>
> You know you can turn all of that off, right?
>
> Aaron.
Hey, Aa
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip]>
Indeed, properly it should be implemented like stylesheets for web
pages. You can change the entire look of a web page (not just colors
and fonts) by changing to a different stylesheet. If Finale files
stored a score layout that defined systems and page layout, and
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 22:17, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 4, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Lyric tool works well.
Really? Lyric tool works well if you know what you're doing, or if
you never do anything complicated, but it has lots of pit-traps that
the unwray can fall in
David Fenton wrote:
Well, as much as I complained about lyrics in my first big project
with them (in August 2002), now that I learned from all the gurus here
on the list, I find it pretty darned easy to use. The main point:
DON'T USE TYPE INTO SCORE
Once you figure that out, it's pretty easy t
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
David Fenton wrote:
Well, as much as I complained about lyrics in my first big project
with them (in August 2002), now that I learned from all the gurus here
on the list, I find it pretty darned easy to use. The main point:
DON'T USE TYPE INTO SCORE
Once you figure that
David Bailey wrote:
I know that when I have used type into score I have run into problems
in editing the lyrics afterwards and in repairing mistakes I have
made. I stopped using it after repeatedly trying to use it and not
being able to make it work correctly. I simply use the Edit Lyrics
and
At 6:55 PM -0400 6/4/04, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 2:00 PM -0700 6/04/04, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Layout would probably NOT be linked, but NOTES would. Does that
make sense? I can't count how many times I've changed something in
a score and FORGOT to update it in a part. Re extracting the part
On Jun 6, 2004, at 6:14 AM, dhbailey wrote:
[answering Noel Stoutenberg, regarding Type in Score entry of lyrics]
and I'd ask some examples to explain this "quirky" behavior, as type
into score seems pretty straightforward to me, Select a lyric type
(verse, chorus, section), and number, and type
On Jun 6, 2004, at 5:01 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Style sheets would be a fantastic addition to Finale!
I could be wrong, but my sense is that incorporating style sheets
directly into Finale is too impractical to even consider as a feature
request to MakeMusic.
What is less impractical, I think, is to
At 7:50 PM -0400 6/4/04, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:55 PM 06/04/2004, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
For example, I HATE the way Microsoft Word
makes assumptions about what I want done with my typing, like
"correcting" my spelling without telling me, or putting bullets or
numbers when I hit carriage r
At 09:13 PM 6/6/2004, John Howell wrote:
>Where? How!? That might make it almost useable!!!
Spelling is under Tools | Options | Spelling & Grammar -- uncheck "Check
Spelling as You Type". Most other auto things are under Tools |
AutoCorrect. This is Word 2000 on Win; YMMV on other platforms or
I wrote:
OK, but the problem is not with type into score, it is with the edit
dialog box, which does not properly adjust syllable assignments when
one uses the edit dialog box in a manner which changes the total
syllable count.
to which Mark replied
Correct, except for your word "properly". Th
On Jun 6, 2004, at 6:54 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
If I have correctly deduced how Finale deals with lyrics, when a
syllable is assigned to a note, the note to which it is assigned is
given an attribute which is a number of syllables by which the
syllable is offset from the first one. Now, ima
Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 6, 2004, at 5:01 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Style sheets would be a fantastic addition to Finale!
I could be wrong, but my sense is that incorporating style sheets
directly into Finale is too impractical to even consider as a feature
request to MakeMusic.
Finale stores page da
Mark D Lew wrote:
If Edit Lyrics were to behave like Type-in-Score, as you seem to be
suggesting it might, the syllables would all be reassigned so that
they remain in the same place on the page, but that is exactly what
the user does NOT want in this case.
I do tend to use type into score mor
At 6:14 AM -0400 6/07/04, dhbailey wrote:
So it would still be possible to override things in each part if you
desired to do so, and if a part were orphaned you would still be
able to adjust everything, BUT you could make adjustments in the
score to the layout of the parts (sort of like you can
On 6 Jun 2004 at 8:01, dhbailey wrote:
> David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> [snip]>
> > Indeed, properly it should be implemented like stylesheets for web
> > pages. You can change the entire look of a web page (not just colors
> > and fonts) by changing to a different stylesheet. If Finale files
> > sto
On 6 Jun 2004 at 8:13, dhbailey wrote:
> David W. Fenton wrote:
>
> > On 4 Jun 2004 at 22:17, Mark D Lew wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Jun 4, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Lyric tool works well.
> >>
> >>Really? Lyric tool works well if you know what you're doing, or if
> >>yo
On 6 Jun 2004 at 15:39, Mark D Lew wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2004, at 6:14 AM, dhbailey wrote:
>
> [answering Noel Stoutenberg, regarding Type in Score entry of lyrics]
>
> >> and I'd ask some examples to explain this "quirky" behavior, as
> >> type into score seems pretty straightforward to me, Sel
On 6 Jun 2004 at 15:56, Mark D Lew wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2004, at 5:01 AM, dhbailey wrote:
>
> > Style sheets would be a fantastic addition to Finale!
>
> I could be wrong, but my sense is that incorporating style sheets
> directly into Finale is too impractical to even consider as a feature
> requ
On 6 Jun 2004 at 21:13, John Howell wrote:
> At 7:50 PM -0400 6/4/04, Aaron Sherber wrote:
> >At 06:55 PM 06/04/2004, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> >>For example, I HATE the way Microsoft Word
> >>makes assumptions about what I want done with my typing, like
> >>"correcting" my spelling without te
On 7 Jun 2004 at 6:14, dhbailey wrote:
> But if it's possible in web-sites with html programming, it can't be
> that difficult to implement.
I agreed with everything you wrote up to this point.
You can't compare implementation across different domains.
HTML was designed from the very beginning
On 7 Jun 2004 at 8:37, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> At 6:14 AM -0400 6/07/04, dhbailey wrote:
> >
> >So it would still be possible to override things in each part if you
> >desired to do so, and if a part were orphaned you would still be able
> >to adjust everything, BUT you could make adjustment
On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:47 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Seems to me that Lyrics got the way it is because it is an *old*
subsystem, dating back to very early versions of Finale, and the
changes to it have been bolted on the sides over time, making it
rather baroque and nearly impossible to figure out.
On Jun 7, 2004, at 5:24 AM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
(though I consider it a design flaw that when syllable counts are
changed in the edit lyrics box, syllables shift from the current
system to the next one, or from the next system to the current one,
depending upon whether the syllable count is
On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:59 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Yes, it *is* a problem with Type in Score, since certain kinds of
problems that pop up in Type in Score can only be figured out by
going to Edit Lyrics. I can't remember a specific example, but with
my Requiem example, that was where I got in trou
On Jun 7, 2004, at 3:14 AM, dhbailey wrote:
But if it's possible in web-sites with html programming, it can't be
that difficult to implement.
Right, but it's not the "web-site" that does the implementing, it's the
browser. The browser is essentially an interpreter of HTML code. The
analog woul
On 7 Jun 2004 at 16:12, Mark D Lew wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:47 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
> > Indeed, a lot of very small changes could make Lyrics much more
> > usable (like allowing resizing of the click assignment dialog --
> > geez, how frigging hard would *that* be?),
>
> Amen! And t
I wrote:
(though I consider it a design flaw that when syllable counts are
changed in the edit lyrics box, syllables shift from the current
system to the next one, or from the next system to the current one,
depending upon whether the syllable count is increased or decreased;
Oops. I didn't wr
At 7:53 PM -0500 6/07/04, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
I wrote:
(though I consider it a design flaw that when syllable counts are
changed in the edit lyrics box, syllables shift from the current
system to the next one, or from the next system to the current one,
depending upon whether the syllable c
On Jun 7, 2004, at 4:35 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Mid-90s? Looks more like late 80s to me!
You're probably right. I'm habitually slow to upgrade, so I'm usually
about five years behind.
mdl
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.e
At 2:07 PM -0400 6/7/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
Don't you folks always explore the menus of programs when you start
using them? With Microsoft programs on Windows, user controllable
options are stored on the Tools menu, under OPTIONS. Word also has
separate menu entries for Autocorrect. I don't if
On Jun 7, 2004, at 5:53 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Oops. I didn't write what I really meant to say. I don't consider it
a design flaw that syllables shift from one note to another, across
system boundaries, but that it can happen that the syllable assigned
to the last note of a particular sta
On 7 Jun 2004 at 22:41, John Howell wrote:
> At 2:07 PM -0400 6/7/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
> >Don't you folks always explore the menus of programs when you start
> >using them? With Microsoft programs on Windows, user controllable
> >options are stored on the Tools menu, under OPTIONS. Word also
90 matches
Mail list logo
