Re: [Sursound] FLAC and max number of channels

er can contain multiple streams, including multiple FLAC streams. Note that there is no standard to define what channels go in which FLAC stream; you will need to roll your own. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.co

Re: [Sursound] So long CIPIC HRTF?

This reduces the airspeed, and so helps the pilot escape from a spiral. Sigmund Gudvangen wrote: > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Death Spiral > > What has this aviation stuff to do with surround sound? Well, nothing; boy, is my face red. Please ignore this post. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Lee

Re: [Sursound] Recording in a studio of a Jazz-Piano and singer

nd. You really need an acoustically live studio so that there is some surround to record. Recordings by Nimbus Records are an extreme example of this. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.c

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic UHJ Stereo decoder to speaker feeds

Sampo Syreeni wrote: ... > Nota bene, we've talked about this dependency on rig diameter on-list > before. Under the topic of Martin Leese's "Big Geese". Not mine; try: From: Peter Lennox Subject: [Sursound] Distance & Ambisonics Date: Tue Jul 10 1

Re: [Sursound] WavPack (was: Re: Ambix files)

On 5/23/21, Martin Leese wrote: > Extending FLAC to more than eight channels > has been discussed in the past.For > example, look in the sursound archives for this > long post by me: > Subject: Re: [Sursound] octofile release > Date: Mon Jul 30 22:30:42 EDT 20

Re: [Sursound] WavPack (was: Re: Ambix files)

ple, look in the sursound archives for this long post by me: Subject: Re: [Sursound] octofile release Date: Mon Jul 30 22:30:42 EDT 2018 It is not possible, except by using multiple FLAC streams in a single container. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordal

Re: [Sursound] Speakers for an immersive audio-video installation

MrUnmenge wrote: > Thanks a bunch to everyone for their answers! > > @J?rgen and Martin: I am confused, if I click the link to the attachment, i > only get plaintext (google chrome) and unfortunately i'm not in the aes? > i've send you, j?rgen, a PM for that. Hi Juergen

Re: [Sursound] Speakers for an immersive audio-video installation

You can then view the five page PDF file. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman

Re: [Sursound] Rode NT SF1

Attachment scrubbed, here it is as a link instead: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ua74tvsp3bwa8lp/Rode-To-Fancy_template.RPP.zip?dl=0 From: Sursound on behalf of PARKER Martin Sent: 24 June 2020 10:17 To: Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] Rode

Re: [Sursound] Rode NT SF1

hown https://plugins.iem.at/. You can simply bounce the bformatAmbix track to perform the conversion from a- to- bformatAmbix. Best Martin~ --- Dr Martin Parker Programme Director MSc Sound Design Reid School of Music Edinburgh College of Art University of Edinburgh +44(0)7813 217092 +44(0)131 650 2

[Sursound] [OT]Sonarworks SoundID

es/2020/02/more-personal-stereo-with-soundid/ https://support.sonarworks.com/hc/en-us/categories/360002410539-SoundID Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound ma

Re: [Sursound] analog planner

n the other reports. In your attic, did you happen to find an index page listing the reports and their titles? Many thanks, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursou

Re: [Sursound] Tetramic UK repair options?

he USA for repair is very dated, but it used to be that you could complete a form and, *providing the serial number of the item was the same on return*, there were no added charges, > Of course, this will only get worse following Brexit, You have no idea how good it feels to have emigrated to Can

Re: [Sursound] practical HOA encoding

;, Preprint 3308 of the 92nd Audio Engineering Society Convention, Vienna (1992 Mar.) (Simulating distance effects in directional reproduction.) Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.trip

Re: [Sursound] Speaker array advice

s, you only need a single-band "velocity" decoder. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.e

Re: [Sursound] 2nd order A-format to B-format equations

Thank you. Much appreciated. - martin On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 22:36, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:59:45PM +0000, Martin Dupras wrote: > > > However, no one has answered my question. I will ask again. > > > > Can someone point me to any publishe

Re: [Sursound] 2nd order A-format to B-format equations

resources for 1st order but not for 2nd order. Thank you. - martin On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 21:54, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 04:50:06AM +0800, Stephen McArdle wrote: > > > I think the question might be more simpler than this. > > For 1st order (with 4 microphones

[Sursound] 2nd order A-format to B-format equations

Hi, Could anyone point me in the direction of a resource that shows the equations for converting a 2nd order A-format recording into B-format? I would like to convert in realtime from a Core Octomic in software (e.g. PD, Max, SuperCollider) without the use of a plugin. Thanks, - martin

Re: [Sursound] Multi-user head tracked binaural ambisonics query

> sending data back to the individual binaural decoder, and then each user > receiving their own modified stream from this. Maybe I am being silly, but would a much simpler solution not be to use speakers? The video is canned and projected. The soundfield is fixed relative to the video. Why

Re: [Sursound] tetrahedral mic record

t's not a good idea. This appears to be part of a long thread with the Subject "Formal A-format". Eero asked his question on July 27, 2006. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ _

Re: [Sursound] Looking for mic advice

nt to get as transparent a sound field as possible. There is a list of mics on Wikipedia at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ambisonic_hardware#Microphone_Arrays If the list is incomplete then will people please add to it. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese st

Re: [Sursound] octofile release

Audio/StereoMix_chunk.html This can be used not only in Ambisonic files (see Example 3 on the Stereo Mix chunk page), but also in non-Ambisonic multi-channel files. This makes it more likely to be adopted. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org

Re: [Sursound] octofile release

So the maximum of eight channels is really embedded into the FLAC standard. To change this would require a whole new standard (or the use of multiple grouped FLAC streams in an Ogg container). Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members

[Sursound] Does "gravure universelle" (universal engraving) mean Ambisonic?

Is this LP Ambisonic? The LP is on offer here: https://www.ebay.ca/i/153041669368 The UHJ Discography is available here: http://www.surrounddiscography.com/ Many thanks, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tri

Re: [Sursound] Anyone in Munich?

he bottom where it says "Unsubscribe or edit options". After entering your password, on the next screen complete "Your name (optional):" and hit "Change My Address And Name". Simple really :-) Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni

[Sursound] Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container

On 5/2/17, Martin Leese wrote: > Hi All, > > This is yet another version of the draft standard > for Ambisonics using Ogg Opus by some guys, > one of whom is still at Google. It was > discussed on this list last year (in May and > November): > > https://tools.iet

Re: [Sursound] Soundfield mic disintegrating foam

m gunk over the capsules or there is not. Leaving the mic closed will not change the result when you finally do so. Also,the longer you leave gunk in there (if any) then the more time is has to glue itself onto the capsules. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumn

Re: [Sursound] Simple Software to Play a 6-channel WAV File (Windows)?

e limit is 1.5 kHz or thereabouts. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

[Sursound] Questions on Ambisonics and space / VR Radio Theater

and Unity? The project is still pending funding so I am interested to hear both low-budget and more expensive approaches. Thank you all for reading. Martin -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/at

[Sursound] Free Ambisonic sound effects

Hi, 41 Ambisonic Sound Effects (2.9 GB / 68+ minutes) for free; visit: https://www.asoundeffect.com/ambisonic-sound-effects-giveaway/ I have no connection, blah, blah, blah. Regatds, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese

[Sursound] Two Draft standards for VR

-application-format/profiles-under-considerations-isoiec-23000 The VR Industry Forum has published draft guidelines; available at: http://www.vr-if.org/wp-content/uploads/VRIF_Draft_Guidelines-v0.0draft10-2017-09-12.pdf Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http

[Sursound] Project at upwork.com

2) Souk / food market 3) Children playing (speaking Arabic) https://www.upwork.com/job/Spatial-Ambisonic-360-soundscapes-Middle-East_~01f7ccf7e773d1ee4c/ Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese

[Sursound] Songbird

Hi, Google's Songbird is a JavaScript library that can render HOA to stereo and the Web; visit: https://opensource.googleblog.com/2017/08/bringing-real-time-spatial-audio-to-web-with-songbird.html https://google.github.io/songbird/ Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.

Re: [Sursound] Sound Based Composition(surround)

view?usp=sharing More punted off to the side than removed. I successfully downloaded the attachment from the sursound website. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___

Re: [Sursound] Help: what am I doing wrong?

of signals. But this is useful, thank you. I wouldn't be surprised to find that I've overlooked something, so any more things to check are welcome! - martin On 5 July 2017 at 23:48, Steven Boardman wrote: > Ok. > > Just to rule out, only use the ambeo plugin for the ambeo. If

Re: [Sursound] Help: what am I doing wrong?

he Ambeo plugin expects the capsules to be FLU, FRD, BLD and BRU, which I believe to be the same on both the TetraMic and the Sennheiser Ambeo. - martin On 5 July 2017 at 23:24, Steven Boardman wrote: > When you are converting from A to B-format are you going to FuMa or Ambix > convention? &

[Sursound] Help: what am I doing wrong?

mixed-order scheme = HV // input channel order: W Y Z X V T R S U Q O M K L N P // output speaker order: S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 S06 S07 S08 S09 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 S20 S21 I'll welcome any suggestion or advice! Thanks, - martin ___

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container

Hi All, This is yet another version of the draft standard for Ambisonics using Ogg Opus by some guys, one of whom is still at Google. It was discussed on this list last year (in May and November): https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-03 Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E

Re: [Sursound] summary of everything (in the guise of a Sennheiser Ambeo mic critical/comparative review)

ssue 1), and possibly earlier. (GMail does not display an "Oldest ››" button, so it is difficult for me to get back to the beginning.) Unfortunately, I don't have an easy way to turn these into a *publicly* searchable archive. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin

[Sursound] Ambisonics in an Ogg Opus Container

Hi All, This is an updated version of the draft standard for Ambisonics using Ogg Opus by some guys at Google. It was discussed on this list last year (in May and November): https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-codec-ambisonics-02.html Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese

Re: [Sursound] AES UK North Workshop on Capturing and Rendering Audio for VR

rver. As there is no money swishing around, I suggest you just ignore it. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.

Re: [Sursound] The BBC & Quadrophony in 1973

On 1/5/17, Martin Leese wrote: > "Alan Varty" wrote: >> Hello Eero. >> >> I cannot remember which issues contained the schematics for the Matrix-H >> only variomatrix decoder, sorry. > > This looks like the following Wireless World > two-pag

Re: [Sursound] The BBC & Quadrophony in 1973

were some simple mods to change from H to HJ. I remember this article, but cannot find it in my heap of stuff. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing l

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics on the web pt.1: JSAmbisonics library update

by Opus). Visit: https://wiki.xiph.org/MIME_Types_and_File_Extensions Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.musi

[Sursound] Google's Omnitone

/2016/07/25/googles-omnitone-surround-sound-project-brings-us-closer-to-web-based-vr/ The article contains a link to a Google Blog post: http://google-opensource.blogspot.ca/2016/07/omnitone-spatial-audio-on-web.html As you can see, Google has made Omnitone open source. Regards, Martin -- Mar

Re: [Sursound] Using Ambisonic for a live streaming VR project

7;t remember the mic configuration though. Could this good result be because the soundfield is stable and head movements are used as would be the case for head-tracked headphones? But then why front localisation still poor? Be interested to know what people think. Martin From: Richard Lee To: &qu

[Sursound] Ambisonics in Ogg Opus

RFC 7845. The draft has been discussed on the Xiph Opus mailing list. Unfortunately, I am not subscribed to that list, so only became aware of the draft today via a Google Alert. To subscribe to the Xiph Opus list, visit: http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus Regards, Martin -- Martin

Re: [Sursound] Leyf?u Lj?sinu by Hildur Gu?nad?ttir UHJ-encoded?

Martin Leese wrote: > Hi, > > There is a CD on eBay which is not in the UHJ Discography. However, > the details state: > > Leyf?u Lj?sinu (Icelandic for "Allow the light"), was recorded live at > the Music Research Centre, University of York, in January [2012?] by &

[Sursound] Leyfðu Ljósinu by Hildur Guðnadóttir UHJ-encoded?

s CD is UHJ-encoded? Many thanks, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - uns

Re: [Sursound] Furse-Malham to ACN conversion

Thank you all for the very helpful tips. I will try those things tomorrow. - martin On 22 March 2016 at 18:49, Martin Dupras wrote: > Today I tried playback sources in third order Ambisonics on a 8+6+1 > hemispheric speaker array using Reaper. It didn't quite work as > intended

[Sursound] Furse-Malham to ACN conversion

ositions went practically silent. Any advice on where to go next? Many thanks, - martin ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] Acoustic properties of round rooms ?

Sasso - first impressions Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu

Re: [Sursound] Acoustic properties of round rooms ?

not work, I went to groups.google.com and searched for: "spherical room" audio with the double quotes.) Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing lis

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

Martin Leese wrote: > Peter Lennox wrote: >> Following on from discussions of decoder solutions: Forgive me if I've >> missed this (I've been watching sursound for about 20 years, or so - but >> I >> just may have missed the odd discussion!) >&g

[Sursound] Help me with ADT

nyone can shed some light, I'd be very, very grateful. Many thanks, - martin ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.

Re: [Sursound] Different usages, different spaces, different decoders?

leted. I still have the files, but am not sure of the best way for making them available. ... > (and I haven't even mentioned the possible > variety of speaker dispersion characteristics!) Dermot also looked at this. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumn

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 91, Issue 19

he patents have expired). This makes it a lot more difficult to make money from Ambisonics. Please note that I do not condone such attitudes; I am merely pointing out that they exist. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.c

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

Thank you to all who replied to my post. Special thanks to Fons, Jörn and Fernando who have suggested practical starting points. I will make some calculations and decide on what will be most practical for my experiment. I will report with my successes (or failures). Many thanks! - martin On

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

principle using commercial software that decodes something that is an open format; I do have issue being locked into a format or protocol that is not in the hands of the public. - martin On 9 February 2016 at 23:04, Augustine Leudar wrote: > I understand - most of my stuff is site specific so

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

sic experiments with Distance-Based Amplitude Panning with reasonably good results, I just haven't gone much further. I've used it in some site-specific installation work to good effect, but again it didn't strike me as being particularly scalable or portable, hence why Ambisonics is st

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

really see which techniques seriously compete with Ambisonics, but I'll very happily check them out if you point me to them. - martin ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edi

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

Thanks Archontis, that is very useful. I'll try that, it seems to corroborate what I had in mind initially. What's the worse that can happen, right? :) Thanks for the help! - martin On 9 February 2016 at 22:34, Politis Archontis wrote: > Hi Martin, > > HOA are not limited to

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

p digging for a hemispherical layout though. Still not found a single example yet. Thanks for all the help! - martin On 9 February 2016 at 22:18, Michael Chapman wrote: > > Firstly, I've never got beyond twelve (two stacked hexagons), so > ignore my comments at your _non_-peril ;-)>

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

ration" so I (wrongly, perhaps) assumed that there were capable decoders, and there would likely be already available "templates" or "typical scenarios" to use as a starting point. Thanks, - martin - martin On 9 February 2016 at 22:02, Augustine Leudar wrote: > I kn

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

re two stacked rings (stacked octagons) or a hemisphere. I would have thought that the hemisphere would be the better choice, and in my scenario, a full lighting rig allows me theoretically speaking to have speakers at the required positions. Again, thank you for all the responses. - martin On 8

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

Martin Dupras wrote: > Hi, > > I'm intending to try setting up a 16-speaker Ambisonics array next > week in a small TV studio. I'm trying to figure out the practical > arrangements for setting up the speakers. I was wondering if anyone > with experience might be able t

Re: [Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

That's very useful. Thanks, Dave. - martin On 8 February 2016 at 17:40, Dave Hunt wrote: > Hi, > >> The other thing I would welcome is advice on how to mount the speakers >> to lighting rigs in a manner that is practical enough to offer some >> good compromise

[Sursound] Advice on practicalities of 16-speaker half-spherical arrangement

cal enough to offer some good compromise between precision and ease of setup. I believe the speakers we'll be using for the upper tiers will be Genelec 8060s. Many thanks. Any advice will be greatly appreciated! Cheers, - martin ___ Surs

Re: [Sursound] YouTube adds ambisonics support

onics#Complete_mixed-order_sets_.28.23H.23V.29 However, I don't know of anybody who has experience with decoding such sets. The most general solution, and the one I would promote, is to combine both schemes and specify three numbers, #H, #P, and #V. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail:

Re: [Sursound] Is the LP SV-95002(D) UHJ-encoded?

nt mix. Steven Dive wrote: > Hi Martin, > > The Discogs site has the DKP 9001 version. Is this of any use? Discogs.com lists four versions: 1. DKP 9001 2. DKP 9001 3. SV-95002 4. SV-95002 D (should be "SV-95002(D)") I assume 1 and 2 are duplicates. I own 4, which states on t

[Sursound] Is the LP SV-95002(D) UHJ-encoded?

his series, so he probably was for this one as well. The Ambisonic UHJ Discography lists only the UK release DKP 9001; visit: http://www.surrounddiscography.com/uhjdisc/ambindex.htm Many thanks, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/ma

Re: [Sursound] SQ QUAD

mode did not use shelf filters). Also the W' signal appears to be the W signal after removal of the Sqrt(2) weighting. Anyone interested in implementing this decoder will need to read the refs, which will be somewhere in the Ambisonic Motherlode. Regards, Martin Michael Gerzon, "Multi

Re: [Sursound] Advice on new loudspeaker array... Genelec 8010 speakers?

Charles Veasey wrote: > Martin - > > To clarify the use of the subs within a tetrahedral array, it would require > the subs to be elevated off the floor? At least one, as described by Michael. > Given the weight of most subs, this > seems a bit difficult in practice. Thought

Re: [Sursound] Advice on new loudspeaker array... Genelec 8010 speakers?

-band Ambisonic decoder, which also handles higher frequencies, you need more speakers than three/four. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound maili

Re: [Sursound] Advice on new loudspeaker array... Genelec 8010 speakers?

Sent from my iPhone > On 14 Oct 2015, at 18:31, Augustine Leudar wrote: > > Maybe out of your budget - but check out the Genelec 8351 a - they also > have a room correction system that will work on arrays of up to 32 speakers. > For those that do not have gear acquisition syndrome here is some

Re: [Sursound] Release of VVEncode

Add me as another voice in favour of AU! - martin On 7 October 2015 at 14:34, Steven Boardman wrote: > Consider me a tester too! > > I use all plugin formats in many different apps, over windows and mac osx. > > All the best > > Steve > > > > > On 7 Oct 2

Re: [Sursound] [OT] Recording uni lectures ...

d/or experience please send details ... Install a temporary hearing loop. That way you don't have to bother recording. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/

Re: [Sursound] SoundField rental in Spain

he results as have the artists recorded (all non-commercial for professional musician friends as a hobby for me). I mix to FO8 but also plan to try some binaural processing soon.Regards,Martin   From: Rafael Hidalgo To: sursound@music.vt.edu Sent: Friday, 26 June 2015, 10:37 Subject:

Re: [Sursound] SoundField rental in Spain

Dear Rafael,I have the same set-up with Coresound and Tascam and am curious about the Busman Mod - what improvement do you notice and do you consider it worthwhile. I'm UK based so less convenient to ship for a mod.Best Regards, Martin Richards From: Rafael Hidalgo To: sur

Re: [Sursound] Tiny ultrasonic ambisonics for mice

tion frequency is decreased to 400 Hz to better accommodate off-center listeners.) I don't offhand know the distance between the ears of a mouse. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ _

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics and Binaural in Reaper

Many thanks - look forward to trying at the weekend. Martin Sent from my iPhone > On 27 May 2015, at 21:49, James Anthony Enda Bates wrote: > > Hi Jake/Martin, here are those videos I mentioned. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ5sdldXo-Y > https://www.youtube.com/w

Re: [Sursound] ambisonic.xyz

Thanks (and also others for their helpful comments). That video would be most useful. Maybe it should find it's way onto ambisonia...Regards,Martin From: James Anthony Enda Bates To: sursound@music.vt.edu Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2015, 17:04 Subject: Re: [Sursound] ambisoni

Re: [Sursound] ambisonic.xyz

u making a tool available to convert B to binaural as shown in your demo?Thanks,Martin From: Marc Lavallée To: sursound@music.vt.edu Sent: Monday, 25 May 2015, 12:17 Subject: Re: [Sursound] ambisonic.xyz On Mon, 25 May 2015 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC), Martin Richards wrote: > I make a l

Re: [Sursound] ambisonic.xyz

on to the stereo version. Is there a freeware version out there for windows (don't have mac)? I may be able to make some of the recording available to ambisonic.xyz and will look into this depending on their willingness.Thanks,Martin Richards From: Bo-Erik Sandholm To: Surr

Re: [Sursound] UHJ anyone?

page you cited: http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/ambisonics/uhjtest/ is pretty much it. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail

Re: [Sursound] Boids for Ambisonic Panning

It seems to be traditional (ie, nobody knows who was the original author). Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.v

[Sursound] ENVELOP - 3D Sound, on Kickstarter.com

Hi All, I fell across this Kickstarter campaign. I have no connection, blah, blah, blah. Does anybody know more? Below are some extracts. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ENVELOP - 3D Sound https

[Sursound] AES 57th International Conference's Future Of Audio Entertainment Technology

AES 57th International Conference's Future Of Audio Entertainment Technology http://livedesignonline.com/aes-57th-international-conferences-future-audio-entertainment-technology http://www.aes.org/conferences/57/ — As the AES hosts its 57th International Conference next month on the “Future of Au

Re: [Sursound] Oculus Rift Visual Demo + Ambisonic Audio Available?

se there actually > might not even *be* such a thing "due below". It might help if you think of this as "from the direction of your feet" as opposed to "due below". This is normal when you are lying flat on your back in bed. Regards, Martin -- Martin

[Sursound] Call for works - reach - a non-stop playlist of bFormat sound and music

on in gallery spaces on the 15th December. Would be great to meet some of you at this. Best wishes Martin~ martin.par...@ed.ac.uk Programme Director, MSc Sound Design http://soundeducation.net Sound Lab Edinburgh: http://sites.ace.ed.ac.uk/sdresearch/ Tel. +44(0)131 650 2333 Mob. +44(0)7813 21

Re: [Sursound] No more daily digest?

ber 6. > > Am I the only one? Nope, I am in the same boat. Also, this is a pest for me because Google Mail then truncates the overly long e-mail messages. I have passed the problem onto the list owner, who is working on it. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanford

Re: [Sursound] £100,000 for 3D sound development

On 10/21/14, Martin Leese wrote: ... > Here is a link to the entire (brief) article: > http://eandt.theiet.org/news/2014/oct/3d-sound-development.cfm Here are a couple more links: http://www.hud.ac.uk/news/2014/october/100kprojecttounderstandhowthebrainhears3dsound.php http://gow.epsrc

[Sursound] £100,000 for 3D sound development

n of sound. Here is a link to the entire (brief) article: http://eandt.theiet.org/news/2014/oct/3d-sound-development.cfm Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Surs

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Eero Aro wrote: ... > It's a command line program. Very fast. Needs lotsa careful typing. Or sloppy typing into a text editor to create a BAT file. Then execute the BAT file. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/mart

Re: [Sursound] BBC Proms in 4.0

help that there is no actual HTML5 standard, as yet. That is to say, there is no *ratified* standard. The last time I looked, a ratified standard was scheduled for late 2014. Hopefully, when this happens, browsers will make an extra effort to adhere to it. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Lees

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics rig - loudspeakers directivity

refore appear to be recommended such that strong specular reflections are avoided but significant liveness is maintained." Dermot's post is preserved at: http://www.ambisonia.com/Members/mleese/dermot/ Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.lee

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics rig - loudspeakers directivity

was working properly... but this remains a consistent observation... for all reconstruction formats!" Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ ___ Sursound maili

Re: [Sursound] MULTI - 3d-audio concert in Bergen, Norway, 26th June

Apologies all, please disregard that message, it was meant for Anders only. I hit send in haste and failed to rip out my ethernet cable in time... Best wishes Martin~ On 24 Jun 2014, at 11:33, Martin Parker wrote: > Dear Anders, please forgive this unsolicited email, but I noticed y

Re: [Sursound] MULTI - 3d-audio concert in Bergen, Norway, 26th June

/fluteCount-version3.mp3 This kind of thing could perhaps spatialise very well across a wide rig like the one you describe. Let me know if you’re interested in talking further. Meanwhile, I wish you all the best for your concert later this week. Martin~ On 24 Jun 2014, at 10:27, anders.vin

Re: [Sursound] And now for something different...

rrently takes place using ear-buds plugged into players or phones. This doesn't look like it is going to change anytime soon. Binaural with personalized HRTFs would improve this listening experience. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://m

  1   2   3   >