Re: CCIE Design...too much?
Hi Mark, hi all, I totally agree with you. I am currently a CCDP and as a pre-sales engineer, I do not have the opportunity to maintain the equipment. Some of the questions of the CCDP track were already sometimes painful for me (like which show command to use), although I find a command is the best summary of 2 pages theory, and I agree commands must be part of the exams. I would like to upgrade my skills to CCIE (now that CCDP has been degraded, one year ago it was the highest cert for design), but as I understand CCIE lab is really 'speed' of config and troubleshooting. I don't see how I can prepare that on top of my normal job responsabilities, and there's even no way my company would build a lab with that equipement. It's only at cisco that they could afford to dedicate all this equipment to a lab. Now CCIE lab design has been retired for some time... I guess it will be hard for them to find candidates in other companies that Cisco!! Rgds Laurent From: "Mark Holloway" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Mark Holloway" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Design...too much? Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 07:24:14 -0800 Looking at Cisco's requirements for all of their CCIE tracks, it looks like the CCIE Design Lab requires "the candidate to configure all of the devices included in the design." So not only do you design that proposed network, you must configure it too. For those of use who work in the pre-sales engineering field where the CCDA and CCDP made the most sense, I think this is going a little too steep for CCIE Design. I'm not opposed to learning how to configure equipment, but the list of equipment is literally impossible to build a home lab (Catalyst 6500, 3500, 2900, PIX, Local Director, 7500, 7200, 4700, 3600, 2600, 2500, 7830 Call Manager, and more). This is double the R/S Exam. Is it really realistic to expect someone who designs networks (as opposed to administering/troubleshooting) to know all of this? I'm assuming the required knowledge of this technology needs to be top-notch, like with the other CCIE exams. I always felt the design path was more geared toward pre-deployment and not post. Of course, some knowledge of the hands on is good, but in my job today I may sit with a client or a Data Engineer and go over some configs, but I don't maintain the equipment. Just my .02! Opinion appreciated.. Regards, Mark _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question on FTP and TFTP on Routers and Switches,
I am using KIWI's Catools for taking backup's of my running configuration files. Panagiotis Skliros Network Engineer Lambrakis Press S.A. ""Wonkyu Lee"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi All, What I want to accomplish is to download configuration files from running switches(from 29xx-65xx) and routers (25xx-75xx) I got tired of logging into routers and downloading thru telneting. Can I enable a ftp or TFTP feature for the routers and switches ? I saw these command lines from CCO and tried to use ftp command in DOS mode. ~ ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip ftp source-interface Ethernet0 ip ftp username wonkyu ip ftp password password tftp-server rom alias config.txt ~ here i lost, I tried to access my router thru ftp and tftp without success. So my question is, HOW CAN I Make a batch file which downloads a configuration files ? TIA, Wonkyu _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anyone clarify the difference of these two?
There is a difference as not both the source and destination port are the same. Lets say Station A wants to telnet to station B: Source port A: 1024Destination Port: 23 (telnet) So to come back to your access-lists it DOES make a difference. See this partial trace below: Station A: 192.168.1.1 Station B: 192.168.1.22 In the trace you will see the 3-way handshake (Frame 1-3) and after that you will see the Telnet negotiation starting - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frame 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frame Status Source AddressDest. Address Size Rel. Time Delta TimeAbs. Time Summary 1 M [192.168.1.1] [192.168.1.22] 60 0:00:00.000 0.000.000 03/02/2001 08:48:19 AM TCP: D=23 S=2909 SYN SEQ=11781196 LEN=0 WIN=8192 DLC: - DLC Header - DLC: DLC: Frame 1 arrived at 08:48:19.6300; frame size is 60 (003C hex) bytes. DLC: Destination = Station Cisco14A4BFA DLC: Source = Station NGC 0DD6BC DLC: Ethertype = 0800 (IP) DLC: IP: - IP Header - IP: IP: Version = 4, header length = 20 bytes IP: Type of service = 00 IP: 000. = routine IP: ...0 = normal delay IP: 0... = normal throughput IP: .0.. = normal reliability IP: ..0. = ECT bit - transport protocol will ignore the CE bit IP: ...0 = CE bit - no congestion IP: Total length= 44 bytes IP: Identification = 65107 IP: Flags = 4X IP: .1.. = don't fragment IP: ..0. = last fragment IP: Fragment offset = 0 bytes IP: Time to live= 128 seconds/hops IP: Protocol= 6 (TCP) IP: Header checksum = 7910 (correct) IP: Source address = [192.168.1.1] IP: Destination address = [192.168.1.22] IP: No options IP: TCP: - TCP header - TCP: TCP: Source port = 2909 TCP: Destination port= 23 (Telnet) TCP: Initial sequence number = 11781196 TCP: Next expected Seq number= 11781197 TCP: Data offset = 24 bytes TCP: Flags = 02 TCP: ..0. = (No urgent pointer) TCP: ...0 = (No acknowledgment) TCP: 0... = (No push) TCP: .0.. = (No reset) TCP: ..1. = SYN TCP: ...0 = (No FIN) TCP: Window = 8192 TCP: Checksum= 244B (correct) TCP: TCP: Options follow TCP: Maximum segment size = 1460 TCP: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frame 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frame Status Source AddressDest. Address Size Rel. Time Delta TimeAbs. Time Summary 2[192.168.1.22][192.168.1.1]60 0:00:00.008 0.008.408 03/02/2001 08:48:19 AM TCP: D=2909 S=23 SYN ACK=11781197 SEQ=1056999666 LEN=0 WIN=4128 DLC: - DLC Header - DLC: DLC: Frame 2 arrived at 08:48:19.6384; frame size is 60 (003C hex) bytes. DLC: Destination = Station NGC 0DD6BC DLC: Source = Station Cisco14A4BFA DLC: Ethertype = 0800 (IP) DLC: IP: - IP Header - IP: IP: Version = 4, header length = 20 bytes IP: Type of service = 00 IP: 000. = routine IP: ...0 = normal delay IP: 0... = normal throughput IP: .0.. = normal reliability IP: ..0. = ECT bit - transport protocol will ignore the CE bit IP: ...0 = CE bit - no congestion IP: Total length= 44 bytes IP: Identification = 0 IP: Flags = 0X IP: .0.. = may fragment IP: ..0. = last fragment IP: Fragment offset = 0 bytes IP: Time to live= 255 seconds/hops IP: Protocol= 6 (TCP) IP: Header checksum = 3864 (correct) IP: Source address = [192.168.1.22] IP: Destination address = [192.168.1.1] IP: No options IP: TCP: - TCP header - TCP: TCP: Source port = 23 (Telnet) TCP: Destination port= 2909 TCP: Initial sequence number = 1056999666 TCP: Next expected Seq number= 1056999667 TCP: Acknowledgment number = 11781197 TCP: Data offset = 24 bytes TCP: Flags = 12 TCP: ..0. = (No urgent pointer) TCP: ...1 = Acknowledgment TCP: 0... = (No push) TCP: .0.. = (No reset) TCP: ..1. = SYN TCP: ...0 = (No FIN) TCP: Window = 4128 TCP: Checksum=
finished ccnp
Hi all, I have just finished CIT exam yesterday so from today I am a CCNP. The problem is that I passed the old ACRC exam not the new BSCN. Does anyone know if there is a problem with that? And one more question about the CVOICE specialization: is there any book = to read for the exam? Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
port speed
Am I right to say that if I set the port speed to auto , the duplex setting is also set accordingly? Or should we manually set it to full duplex? Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port speed
When set to auto a FE port should negotiate in the following order: 100Base-TX FDX 100Base-T4 100Base-TX 10Base-T FDX 10Base-T For best results, manually code the speed and duplex to match the other end though. "Gayathri" wrote in message 97nuee$mj2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Am I right to say that if I set the port speed to auto , the duplex setting is also set accordingly? Or should we manually set it to full duplex? Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISP's
Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending on the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a floating static route, etc. "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings, Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccnp 1.0/2.0 question
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/shortcuts/FAQ/ see #10 Gordon White wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]... i took the old acrc test right before they retired it. except for support, which i haven't taken yet, the rest of the exams i took were v2.0 (including ccna). will the acrc count toward the new ccnp, or do i have to retake the new routing test? thanks. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISP's
can u give me some more info please "Larry Lamb" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending on the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a floating static route, etc. "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings, Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISP's
Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will significantly influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that you'll use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the Mae-East Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost 30MB. That's going to require a router with 64MB more like 128MB of memory. A lot of this type of configuration will be covered in Internet Routing Architectures by Halabi. It's a Cisco Press title. "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97o0uf$pmu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... can u give me some more info please "Larry Lamb" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending on the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a floating static route, etc. "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings, Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 3640 PRI module cable pinout
I am going to connect a cable from the telco's chrono directly to the PRI module on the 3640. I need the pinouts for the cable from the chrono to the port.I am using cat5 cable. This is what I have found but I am unsure whether it is correct to use as I don't want to blow the module port. Pinouts Telco Chrono PRI Module DB15 1 TX Tip9 TX Tip 2 TX Ring 2 TX Ring 4 RX Tip8 RX Tip 5 RX Ring 15 RX Ring I think this would be 120-Ohm balanced connection. Thanks _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HEX
Why don't you use the calculator of windows accesories? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Dale Frohman Enviado el: Jueves 1 de Marzo de 2001 3:24 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: HEX Does anyone have a way/tricks in remembering how to do HEX conversions? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HEX
Because you can't use it during an exam. Real life...OK, exam...NO. -Original Message- From: Nuria Canamares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:27 AM To: 'Dale Frohman' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HEX Why don't you use the calculator of windows accesories? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Dale Frohman Enviado el: Jueves 1 de Marzo de 2001 3:24 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: HEX Does anyone have a way/tricks in remembering how to do HEX conversions? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port speed
This is true for the Catalyst switches with set / clear commands. For the IOS based devices, you have "speed auto" and "duplex auto". Gayathri wrote: Am I right to say that if I set the port speed to auto , the duplex setting is also set accordingly? Or should we manually set it to full duplex? Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mihai Dumitru Systems Engineer, ROMSYS SA tel: +40 1 2300810, mobile: +40 92 764287 fax: +40 1 2300815 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HEX
When I sat for the BCMSN, I spent a few minutes during the background/preparation questions whipping up a quick hex chart for the boundaries - 10, 20, 30, ... D0, E0, F0. I was very proud of myself until the questions that needed hex conversion had a button at the bottom that opened a full hex-to-decimal conversion page! Don't know about the other tests, though. Andrew Cook -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barronton, Ken Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 7:27 AM To: 'Nuria Canamares' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HEX Because you can't use it during an exam. Real life...OK, exam...NO. -Original Message- From: Nuria Canamares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:27 AM To: 'Dale Frohman' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HEX Why don't you use the calculator of windows accesories? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Dale Frohman Enviado el: Jueves 1 de Marzo de 2001 3:24 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: HEX Does anyone have a way/tricks in remembering how to do HEX conversions? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port speed
Mihai Dumitru wrote: This is true for the Catalyst switches with set / clear commands. For the IOS based devices, you have "speed auto" and "duplex auto". P.S. It is not recommended to leave the speed and duplex to auto (default). Set them manually. Gayathri wrote: Am I right to say that if I set the port speed to auto , the duplex setting is also set accordingly? Or should we manually set it to full duplex? Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mihai Dumitru Systems Engineer, ROMSYS SA tel: +40 1 2300810, mobile: +40 92 764287 fax: +40 1 2300815 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mihai Dumitru Systems Engineer, ROMSYS SA tel: +40 1 2300810, mobile: +40 92 764287 fax: +40 1 2300815 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CID! (Some parting shots....)
Congratulations John! I'm in pursuit of CCNP and CCDP as well. I take the BCSN on Monday. Thanks for your insight into the CID exam. I'll be be taking it in a few months. Have a great weekend! Robert Robert M. Lopez Network Planning Ann Arbor Data Center Pfizer Global Research Development Phone 734-622-3948 Fax 734-622-1690 -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 12:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passed CID! (Some parting shots) I passed, but I received by FAR the lowest score of any Cisco exam I've taken. I was worried that I might have failed it, but I squeaked through somehow. I must agree with others who have mentioned how awful this test is. Sheesh... These were some of the most vague questions and answers that I've ever seen. This is definitely a test where you need to master the art of answering questions the "Cisco Way (tm)." Interestingly, I received a 0% on spotting security issues, which was amusing. :-) I only remember about four security questions and I feel that I got at least two of those correct, while one of them was almost incomprehensible. The SNA kicked my hiney, as well. I even have some experience with it from work and I supplemented that with the Sybex CID study guide and still did not prepare nearly enough for the types of questions I was asked. I only got 42% on the SNA section. The rest of the test was better for me. I think the other categories were all 75% or higher. Believe me, I was sweating big-time while the test was being graded. I was NOT looking forward to more preparation if I had to take it again. Also, there was a LOT of Windows/NetBIOS stuff. Learn it, live it, love it. I think that to do *really* well on this test, it's necessary to have hands-on experience with these protocols. It would be hard to prepare fully for these questions otherwise. I've noticed something else that maybe some of you can relate to. When I passed the CCNA test, I was absolutely ecstatic! I wanted to party all day. When I passed the DCN, I was very happy as well, but not quite as much as when I passed CCNA. I finished up CCNP a couple of weeks ago and felt more a sense of relief than of joy. The only reason my wife and I celebrated was that the next day was Valentine's day so we combined the two occasions. Tonight, after passing CCDP, I'm not even excited at all about it. Weird, huh? However, if I ever finish CCIE, I doubt there will be much of a lack of excitement. Then again, maybe I'm wrong. I think that for some of us, the joy comes in the pursuit, not the catch, and with every cert that we finish, that's one less trophy to hunt and we have to find something else to stay happy. Who knows, maybe after I finish up CCIE (sometime before 2005 g) I'll actually go back and finish up a college degree! :-) Okay, I'm rambling. I'll go to bed now. John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast through firewall
Hi I am trying to pass a muticast stream (IPTV) through a pix firewall. The PIX firewall seems to be blocking it. Anyway of defining a ruleset on the firewall for muticast. I am using PIM DM for muticast routing. I have the option of replacing the PIX with check point. Any help will be appreciated Regards Gautam _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No response from Cisco 2503 series Router
could be many things. Bootroms, bad memory, etcmaybe even fried mainboard. Who did you buy it from? They should take it back On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Tariq Bin Azad wrote: Hello Everybody. I jst bought Cisco 2503 router from USA Ooops !!! My router is not working Here are the symptoms : 1.No response from console 2."system" OK LED on the back of the router is Off. 3.Check the power supply and fan is working. 4.Replaced with the power supply of other working 2500 series router and again 2503 it is not working. Please let me know what could be the problemand how I can try to solve my problems Thanks Tariq _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Special: Catalyst 3100 switch 2503 router blade $1000.00 (16MB / 8MB)!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-222-2638 x 109318-222-2638 x 101 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 1401 Oden St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 18 Cisco Channel Partner Shreveport, LA 71104 Fax 318-221-6612 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLANS and DHCP
ip helper-address On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Chris Sees wrote: HI, Does anyone have suggestions for implementing DHCP in an enterprise environment that wants to use VLAN's (for administratve, regular users, etc. - for security purposes) and DHCP at the same time? It seems like you would need multiple DHCP servers (carefully placed). ? Thanks in advance. Chris _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Special: Catalyst 3100 switch 2503 router blade $1000.00 (16MB / 8MB)!!! I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! email me for a quote Brian Feeny,CCDP,CCNP+VAS Scarlett Parria [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-222-2638 x 109318-222-2638 x 101 Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net 1401 Oden St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD Suite 18 Cisco Channel Partner Shreveport, LA 71104 Fax 318-221-6612 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Better do those V-labs while you can
It was a bloodbath over at Metntor Technologies this morning - another big RIF. Better do those V-labs while they are still available... looks like it won't be long. Z _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Device Fault Manager
Has anyone used this with the LAN bundle and give me some pros and cons? Thanks, Jeff _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Change in CCIE Lab Price
I find this quite annoying. You can't tell me that with the increased volume of registrations Cisco isn't making more money than ever off the exam. I assume that this is a feeble attempt to reduce the number of candidates scheduling the lab. For those whose company is paying the bill, the extra $250 won't make any difference. For those who are funding everything personally, it's just a burden; they've come too far to let the extra $250 stop them. In any case, it just gives me that much extra incentive to pass on the first ($1000) try. Just my $0.02... Craig At 07:07 PM 3/1/2001 -0800, you wrote: I just got this, which may be of interest to some... - March 1, 2001 Dear CCIE Candidate, We are contacting you to confirm that you are currently scheduled for a CCIE lab exam and that we will soon be implementing some program changes that may have an impact upon you. After a rigorous evaluation of our current cost structure, we find it necessary to increase our CCIE Lab exam fee to reflect our current cost of doing business. The present $1,000 lab fee has been in effect since the CCIE organization was first launched in 1993. Effective on April 1, 2001, we will begin charging customers $1,250 US per lab attempt, (plus any applicable local taxes). Since you have already received an email confirmation from Cisco regarding the current lab fee of $1,000 US (plus any applicable taxes), we would be happy to honor that price as long as we receive payment no later than March 31, 2001. If we receive payment from you following that date, the new lab fee will apply. If you decide to pay after April 1, 2001 this email will also serve as a new confirmation. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Better do those V-labs while you can
What do you mean? ""Mask Of Zorro"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It was a bloodbath over at Metntor Technologies this morning - another big RIF. Better do those V-labs while they are still available... looks like it won't be long. Z _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HEX
exactly. I had a friend who told me there was some HEX conversions on the BCMSN exam which i am scheduled to take in a couple of weeks. On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Barronton, Ken wrote: Because you can't use it during an exam. Real life...OK, exam...NO. -Original Message- From: Nuria Canamares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:27 AM To: 'Dale Frohman' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HEX Why don't you use the calculator of windows accesories? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Dale Frohman Enviado el: Jueves 1 de Marzo de 2001 3:24 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: HEX Does anyone have a way/tricks in remembering how to do HEX conversions? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIXes and Microsoft CA
Having problems configuring the Microsoft CA for giving certificates to a PIX. I am trying to configure microsoft CA Certificate Server with the PIX, and I am unable to obtain the CA or RA certificate, so, the certificate request fails. I have followed the instructions I found in the Instutor site, but it doesn't work for me. First, I installed the CA in standalone mode, and gave a certificate to it. Later I took the cepsetup.exe from the Windows 2000 resource toolkit and intalled SCEP support for Microsoft CA. I was requested to enter the information for a RA certificate, so I did. After reseting, of course, I typed the following commands from the pix: clock set "current time, the same as in the CA" ip domain-name example.com ip hostname pix ca generate rsa key 512 ca identity alexnap 10.0.0.2:/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll ca configure alexnap ra 1 5 crloptional and NOW. when I type ca authenticate alexnap I obtanin the following sanjose(config)# ca authenticate alexnap C IC trhryeadp tsol eCeAp st!hread wakes up! CRYPTO_PKI: http connection opened PKI: key process suspended and continued CRYPTO_PKI: WARNING: A certificate chain could not be constructed while selecting certificate status CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. CRYPTO_PKI: WARNING: A certificate chain could not be constructed while selecting certificate status CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key CRYPTO_PKI: transaction GetCACert completed Certificate has the following attributes: Fingerprint: 8698efea 67ec44a8 5c3abb18 a3b3da54 CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key Crypto CA thread sleeps! CI thread wakes INDICATING ME THAT THE RA AND CA PUBLIC KEYS COULD NOT BE SET. NOW WHEN I REQUEST A CERTIFICATE..I OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE FROM THE DEBUG CRYPTO CA.. sanjose(config)# CA ENROLL ALEXNAP CISCO % C%r Sytaprtto cCeAr titfihcraetaed enroll mweankt .. % Thee subject names in utphe ce!rtificate will be: sanjose.softneteurope.com CI thread sleeps! CI thread wakes up!% Certificate request sent to Certificate Authority % The certificate request fingerprint will be displayed. sanjose(config)# sanjose(config)# sanjose(config)# CRYPTO_PKI: transaction PKCSReq completed CRYPTO_PKI: status: Crypto CA thread sleeps! CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to select RA encrypt cert CRYPTO_PKI: status = 65535: failed to set up peer auth context CRYPTO_PKI: status = 65535: fail to send out pkcsreq CRYPTO__PKI: All sockets are closed. WHAT IS GOING ON HERE, ANY HELP, OR SHOULD WE CHANGE THE CA OR SHOULD WE CONSTRUCT THE VPN WITH WINDOWS 2000 ( A SHAME) _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Design...too much?
To play devil's advocate a bit, at least in the design area, having the greatest of certifications, unless you have a resume showing real experience, will NOT get you a job in building large and complex networks. It could be a useful exercise to articulate the sort of responsibilities for which a given certification will prepare you. Cisco, frankly, should be doing this far more specifically than they do. While I always despair of Cisco taking any useful comment from this list, such definitions could at least be suggested to them. Let me try an analogy. CID, ostensibly the pinnacle of design information, teaches design principles for small to medium networks. Since its inception, there's been a constant cutback in the critical skills of determining requirements, partially driven by a desire to showcase products. This is most evident in the Stratacom material taking up perhaps 5-10% of the course, time that could have been spent in problem analysis, yet not remotely going into the design principles of a WAN switched network. I could (and have) taken many subjects that CID discusses in a couple of hours (e.g., addressing, OSPF, BGP if it were even discussed, fault-tolerant load-shared switching, and discuss them at useful length for 2 to 5 days). The key thing to understand is what a certification would do for you. I can't imagine that having a CCIE Design would have any useful effect on my ability to get new jobs, but, on the other hand, I can point to a resume of around 30 years of progressively responsible results. My work isn't limited to Cisco alone. So alternative ways of demonstrating advanced design experience include participating in the IETF, writing books and articles, etc. All to be considered in your career planning. Hi Mark, hi all, I totally agree with you. I am currently a CCDP and as a pre-sales engineer, I do not have the opportunity to maintain the equipment. Some of the questions of the CCDP track were already sometimes painful for me (like which show command to use), although I find a command is the best summary of 2 pages theory, and I agree commands must be part of the exams. I would like to upgrade my skills to CCIE (now that CCDP has been degraded, one year ago it was the highest cert for design), but as I understand CCIE lab is really 'speed' of config and troubleshooting. I don't see how I can prepare that on top of my normal job responsabilities, and there's even no way my company would build a lab with that equipement. It's only at cisco that they could afford to dedicate all this equipment to a lab. Now CCIE lab design has been retired for some time... I guess it will be hard for them to find candidates in other companies that Cisco!! Rgds Laurent From: "Mark Holloway" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Mark Holloway" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Design...too much? Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 07:24:14 -0800 Looking at Cisco's requirements for all of their CCIE tracks, it looks like the CCIE Design Lab requires "the candidate to configure all of the devices included in the design." So not only do you design that proposed network, you must configure it too. For those of use who work in the pre-sales engineering field where the CCDA and CCDP made the most sense, I think this is going a little too steep for CCIE Design. I'm not opposed to learning how to configure equipment, but the list of equipment is literally impossible to build a home lab (Catalyst 6500, 3500, 2900, PIX, Local Director, 7500, 7200, 4700, 3600, 2600, 2500, 7830 Call Manager, and more). This is double the R/S Exam. Is it really realistic to expect someone who designs networks (as opposed to administering/troubleshooting) to know all of this? I'm assuming the required knowledge of this technology needs to be top-notch, like with the other CCIE exams. I always felt the design path was more geared toward pre-deployment and not post. Of course, some knowledge of the hands on is good, but in my job today I may sit with a client or a Data Engineer and go over some configs, but I don't maintain the equipment. Just my .02! Opinion appreciated.. Regards, Mark _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another Frame-relay issue..
All,=20 I made another weird discovery this morning in one of my = practice labs. The lab equipment in use; AGS+ : 11.0(22) Frame-relay cloud R1 2501 : 12.0.9(15) Hub sub-interface(s0.1 P-t-P1.1.1.1), and = (s0.2, ip 2.2.2.1) Multipoint R2 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 1.1.1.2 R3 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.2 R4 2520 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.3 After setting the frame circuit and the Hub and spoke routers the HUB = specific local DLCI's come up and go active on the frame switch, the = spoke DLCI's go active the inactive, then deleted. I looked at every = thing that made sense,=20 1)Is the HUB - is the interface-dlci command using the correct dlci's , = Yes! =20 2) At the spokes is the encapsulation type(frame relay) configured, Yes! 3) Is the ip (L3) configured on all devices, Yes! Ok, a "clear frame inverse-arp" and a good sign I get an arp for R2 on = the hub! A second look shows R2 has no mappings and the pvc is = inactive. No matter what I did nothing. No this is really weird... Before I started this lab I did a "wr erase" = on all the routers. I proceeded to do a "wr mem" for the first time = since entering all my commands for my frame relay setup on the HUB, and = out of nowhere all the Spoke DLCI's go active and everything works like = it's suppose too. No, in everything things I've read it says that the commands go active = as they're entered, however here it seemed to require me to wr mem for = the circuit to come up. Has anyone seen this or have it happen in the = past. Thanks Nigel. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem.
The subnet masks on the pix and secondary address of the msfc is 255.255.0.0. Since the ASP routers are using an access list to direct traffic to and from the internet, it may be filtering the route from the msfc. Then we would be sol. I like your idea af switching the primary and secondary ip's on the msfc. Also, there is no gateway of last resort. my default gateway is pointing to the asp routers, and we are using the same eigrp ##. Thanks for your insight. Any further thoughts will be appreciated. Rob -Original Message- From: Moe Tavakoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 0043 To: Rob Cabeca; groupstudy Subject: Re: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem. Back to basics: Check your subnet mask on the interfaces connecting the MSFC and the PIX (on the 155.102/16 net) If you can;t ping the inside address of the PIX then your SOL (make sure nothing is filtering the ping) once you have this established (also check wirring and the such and maybe even go to the extent of making your secondary address the primary on the MSFC) After that you should look into the routing table of your MSFC. Make sure the gateway of last reort (0 0 route) is point to the inside interface of the PIX, and the selective route for the subnet pointing to the ASP routers. Be the packet know your source and destination and follow it at every hop and make sure it can find out wehre to go and how to get back (i.e. an internal route on the PIX for the internal range to the MSFC.) Moe. --- Rob Cabeca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You guys have always been on target for me. I am hoping you give some insight to this. (the following addresses have been slightly altered for obvious reasons but they are true to the real ones). Overview. I am upgrading a network which has a 155.102.0.0 255.255.0.0 network. It is flat. I have implemented a new IP Scheme to be used in several VLAN's and am trying to migrate to it. IP range is 10.25.192.0 - 10.25.223.254 broken up into several /24's. There are 600 devices. Now to the nitty gritty. Network Description The 6506 has seven VLAN's configured as follows: VLAN 1 - 10.25.223.2 /24 Primary 155.102.127.26 /16 secondary. VLAN 2 - 10.25.215.254 /24 VLAN 3 - 10.25.216.254 /24 to - VLAN 7 - 10.25.220.254 /24 There are 2 2600's which are routing to an ASP. Their addresses are router A - 10.25.223.3 B - .4 with .5 as HSRP. There is a Pix 515 using address 155.102.18.191 Nating to the internet. The 2600's have an extended access list on them which directs Port 80 traffic from the 159.102.x.x network between the ASP WAN and the internet. They are also doing NAT from the ASP to the 155.102.x.x network. 1 class C NAT pool for each router. A- 10.25.213.0 /24, B - 10.25.214.0 /24. Problem I cannot ping the firewall interface from the MFSC or the 6506 or from any workstation that is using ANY of the VLAN default gateways. I have full connectivity to the asp wan. I have full connectivity to the other VLAN's. When devices use the 2600's HSRP address as default gateway, they have access to the firewall, the asp and the VLAN's. I have no access to the 2600's as they do not belong to us. I spoke with the Cisco TAC a few times. They gave up and wouldn't escalate it because they could not find our service contract that we purchased. They were anxious to close the case. The trick to this migration is to maintain connectivity to all devices as they are being migrated to the new IP scheme. I will be very grateful to any serious replies to this situation. Thanks for your expertise! Rob _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = _ Moe Tavakoli __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISP's
Larry Lamb wrote: Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will significantly influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that you'll use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the Mae-East Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost 30MB. That's going to require a router with 64MB more like 128MB of memory. second is true. 64 Mb isn't enough already since several months ago. A lot of this type of configuration will be covered in Internet Routing Architectures by Halabi. It's a Cisco Press title. Generally, I would want to say that answer for the question needs real knowledge about several internetworking area. What about propagating of [sub]networks? Whom and what? What about negotiating with both ISP about policy routing and other staff? (I have some experience with working in a ISP as system engineer and can say that it isn't so easy) So, resume is (IMHO): theoretically it is possible of course. But in practice let's say, it is not easy so far... CHEERS, ;-) OLEH "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97o0uf$pmu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... can u give me some more info please "Larry Lamb" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending on the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a floating static route, etc. "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings, Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to update pix520 IOS
This may help. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/upgrade.shtml Steve -Original Message- From: wangjun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 8:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how to update pix520 IOS=20 Hi,all: I can't update PIX520 IOS 4.3(2) to 4.4(5) from floppy ,someone can help me?=20 when I update PIX IOS frome Floppy ,then monitor display following information : Finesse Bios V3.3=20 Booting Floppy =20 ...Execing flop =20 =D6=C2 =C0=F1=A3=A1 wangjun [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another Frame-relay issue..
Sounds like an improper LMI type,. LMI doesn't autosense on 11.0 code. -Original Message- From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:57 AM To: Cisco Group Study; CCIE_Lab Group Study Subject: Another Frame-relay issue.. All,=20 I made another weird discovery this morning in one of my = practice labs. The lab equipment in use; AGS+ : 11.0(22) Frame-relay cloud R1 2501 : 12.0.9(15) Hub sub-interface(s0.1 P-t-P1.1.1.1), and = (s0.2, ip 2.2.2.1) Multipoint R2 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 1.1.1.2 R3 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.2 R4 2520 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.3 After setting the frame circuit and the Hub and spoke routers the HUB = specific local DLCI's come up and go active on the frame switch, the = spoke DLCI's go active the inactive, then deleted. I looked at every = thing that made sense,=20 1)Is the HUB - is the interface-dlci command using the correct dlci's , = Yes! =20 2) At the spokes is the encapsulation type(frame relay) configured, Yes! 3) Is the ip (L3) configured on all devices, Yes! Ok, a "clear frame inverse-arp" and a good sign I get an arp for R2 on = the hub! A second look shows R2 has no mappings and the pvc is = inactive. No matter what I did nothing. No this is really weird... Before I started this lab I did a "wr erase" = on all the routers. I proceeded to do a "wr mem" for the first time = since entering all my commands for my frame relay setup on the HUB, and = out of nowhere all the Spoke DLCI's go active and everything works like = it's suppose too. No, in everything things I've read it says that the commands go active = as they're entered, however here it seemed to require me to wr mem for = the circuit to come up. Has anyone seen this or have it happen in the = past. Thanks Nigel. ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another Frame-relay issue..
This happens to me in frame-relay lab. Apparently the inverse arp does not function the way it should in lab. Right now I always do 'copy run start', then 'reload' on all lab routers to make sure that the inverse arp and what-not work as it should. In a recent actual frame relay implementation between two sites, we had to config the lmi type at one site in order to bring up frame-relay connection. We were using 1720 with v. 12.1(1) at both sites. "Nigel Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All,=20 I made another weird discovery this morning in one of my = practice labs. The lab equipment in use; AGS+ : 11.0(22) Frame-relay cloud R1 2501 : 12.0.9(15) Hub sub-interface(s0.1 P-t-P1.1.1.1), and = (s0.2, ip 2.2.2.1) Multipoint R2 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 1.1.1.2 R3 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.2 R4 2520 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.3 After setting the frame circuit and the Hub and spoke routers the HUB = specific local DLCI's come up and go active on the frame switch, the = spoke DLCI's go active the inactive, then deleted. I looked at every = thing that made sense,=20 1)Is the HUB - is the interface-dlci command using the correct dlci's , = Yes! =20 2) At the spokes is the encapsulation type(frame relay) configured, Yes! 3) Is the ip (L3) configured on all devices, Yes! Ok, a "clear frame inverse-arp" and a good sign I get an arp for R2 on = the hub! A second look shows R2 has no mappings and the pvc is = inactive. No matter what I did nothing. No this is really weird... Before I started this lab I did a "wr erase" = on all the routers. I proceeded to do a "wr mem" for the first time = since entering all my commands for my frame relay setup on the HUB, and = out of nowhere all the Spoke DLCI's go active and everything works like = it's suppose too. No, in everything things I've read it says that the commands go active = as they're entered, however here it seemed to require me to wr mem for = the circuit to come up. Has anyone seen this or have it happen in the = past. Thanks Nigel. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Change in CCIE Lab Price
If the cost of the lab went up to $2500 - I think most people would still pay. (Oops, did I just write that?) I don't think it's an attempt to reduce the number of candidates vs. a recognized stream for added revenue. As a cynic, I think it has very little to do with rising costs. Supply and demand at work, I think. --- Craig Columbus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find this quite annoying. You can't tell me that with the increased volume of registrations Cisco isn't making more money than ever off the exam. I assume that this is a feeble attempt to reduce the number of candidates scheduling the lab. For those whose company is paying the bill, the extra $250 won't make any difference. For those who are funding everything personally, it's just a burden; they've come too far to let the extra $250 stop them. In any case, it just gives me that much extra incentive to pass on the first ($1000) try. Just my $0.02... Craig At 07:07 PM 3/1/2001 -0800, you wrote: I just got this, which may be of interest to some... - March 1, 2001 Dear CCIE Candidate, We are contacting you to confirm that you are currently scheduled for a CCIE lab exam and that we will soon be implementing some program changes that may have an impact upon you. After a rigorous evaluation of our current cost structure, we find it necessary to increase our CCIE Lab exam fee to reflect our current cost of doing business. The present $1,000 lab fee has been in effect since the CCIE organization was first launched in 1993. Effective on April 1, 2001, we will begin charging customers $1,250 US per lab attempt, (plus any applicable local taxes). Since you have already received an email confirmation from Cisco regarding the current lab fee of $1,000 US (plus any applicable taxes), we would be happy to honor that price as long as we receive payment no later than March 31, 2001. If we receive payment from you following that date, the new lab fee will apply. If you decide to pay after April 1, 2001 this email will also serve as a new confirmation. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing things backwards - Question for the CCDPs in the list.
I know that this is not the list for CCDA questions but I hope that you will humor me. I have recently completed CCNP and studied with another engineer who was already CCDA certified. We studied for the CID (640-025) exam together and I passed this exam today. My question is this: Is the DCN (CCDA) exam sufficiently different from the CID that I will need to study for it separately or will the prep for the CID exam suffice. Thanks in advance for your advice. Nathan Miller, CCNP Enterprise Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare West 602-307-2659 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNA good study material
Hi Mr. A, I think among of Suresh or troytec or transcender or bosco or Others, Bosco is the best! George _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doing things backwards - Question for the CCDPs in the list.
The CCDA exam has a lot of case study questions and at least 30 of the questions are case study so make sure that you do all the case studies at the end of Cisco's DCN book. the CID exam does not have any case studies. Reza CCNP,CCDP ""Miller, Nathan - BSC"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I know that this is not the list for CCDA questions but I hope that you will humor me. I have recently completed CCNP and studied with another engineer who was already CCDA certified. We studied for the CID (640-025) exam together and I passed this exam today. My question is this: Is the DCN (CCDA) exam sufficiently different from the CID that I will need to study for it separately or will the prep for the CID exam suffice. Thanks in advance for your advice. Nathan Miller, CCNP Enterprise Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare West 602-307-2659 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doing things backwards - Question for the CCDPs in the list.
When I took the test for the CCDA last year I found it to be the most "fun" of any of the tests. Just read the Cisco Press book and take the test; no cramming or learning commands. It's about the easiest test I've ever taken, and I've been doing certs forever (currently MCSE+I, CCNP/CCDP, CCIE candidate; lapsed CNE, XCSS, and an bunch more over the years)... --- Dennis -Original Message- From: Miller, Nathan - BSC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 8:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Doing things backwards - Question for the CCDPs in the list. I know that this is not the list for CCDA questions but I hope that you will humor me. I have recently completed CCNP and studied with another engineer who was already CCDA certified. We studied for the CID (640-025) exam together and I passed this exam today. My question is this: Is the DCN (CCDA) exam sufficiently different from the CID that I will need to study for it separately or will the prep for the CID exam suffice. Thanks in advance for your advice. Nathan Miller, CCNP Enterprise Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare West 602-307-2659 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed CID! (Some parting shots....)
I'll agree with you on the whole "lack of happiness" thing. The more tests I take...the less I'm happy about it when I'm done. Go figure... Cheerz- Brent "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I passed, but I received by FAR the lowest score of any Cisco exam I've taken. I was worried that I might have failed it, but I squeaked through somehow. I must agree with others who have mentioned how awful this test is. Sheesh... These were some of the most vague questions and answers that I've ever seen. This is definitely a test where you need to master the art of answering questions the "Cisco Way (tm)." Interestingly, I received a 0% on spotting security issues, which was amusing. :-) I only remember about four security questions and I feel that I got at least two of those correct, while one of them was almost incomprehensible. The SNA kicked my hiney, as well. I even have some experience with it from work and I supplemented that with the Sybex CID study guide and still did not prepare nearly enough for the types of questions I was asked. I only got 42% on the SNA section. The rest of the test was better for me. I think the other categories were all 75% or higher. Believe me, I was sweating big-time while the test was being graded. I was NOT looking forward to more preparation if I had to take it again. Also, there was a LOT of Windows/NetBIOS stuff. Learn it, live it, love it. I think that to do *really* well on this test, it's necessary to have hands-on experience with these protocols. It would be hard to prepare fully for these questions otherwise. I've noticed something else that maybe some of you can relate to. When I passed the CCNA test, I was absolutely ecstatic! I wanted to party all day. When I passed the DCN, I was very happy as well, but not quite as much as when I passed CCNA. I finished up CCNP a couple of weeks ago and felt more a sense of relief than of joy. The only reason my wife and I celebrated was that the next day was Valentine's day so we combined the two occasions. Tonight, after passing CCDP, I'm not even excited at all about it. Weird, huh? However, if I ever finish CCIE, I doubt there will be much of a lack of excitement. Then again, maybe I'm wrong. I think that for some of us, the joy comes in the pursuit, not the catch, and with every cert that we finish, that's one less trophy to hunt and we have to find something else to stay happy. Who knows, maybe after I finish up CCIE (sometime before 2005 g) I'll actually go back and finish up a college degree! :-) Okay, I'm rambling. I'll go to bed now. John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch Problem
Hi, Many of my users have been reporting network connectivity disapearing and comming back about a min later. While looking through the logs of one switch (a 2924M-CL-EN) I noticed it had been rebooted recently. What would make a switch reboot itself? The switch isn't anywhere near capacity (according to the scale on the front). Any help greatly appreciated __ Stuart J Pittwood, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stuartpittwood.net _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port speed
Past and recent experince has proven to me to set this speen and duplex right off the bat. In the typical environment how often do you NEED something to be something other than 100Full? What I have done is to get one of the junior guys update the IOS and set all ports to 100Full as items come in the door. If there is a NEED for something other tahn 100Full the changes are made when deploying. Moe. --- Larry Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When set to auto a FE port should negotiate in the following order: 100Base-TX FDX 100Base-T4 100Base-TX 10Base-T FDX 10Base-T For best results, manually code the speed and duplex to match the other end though. "Gayathri" wrote in message 97nuee$mj2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Am I right to say that if I set the port speed to auto , the duplex setting is also set accordingly? Or should we manually set it to full duplex? Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = _ Moe Tavakoli __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VLANS and DHCP
Hi, One more trivial thing: When you decide to deploy more than two DHCP servers for redundancy, it is necessary to divide each total IP pool allocated to that subnet or scope appropriately. DHCP servers don't communicate with each other, so if you don't take that into account, the chances of overlapping IPs being assigned will be high. Regards, Jaeheon True of basic DHCP. The more advanced address management products on the market, however, both register DHCP assignments with dynamic DNS, and have formal database synchronization across multiple servers. Not cheap packages. On 1 Mar 2001 13:47:23 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcos Pacheco) wrote: Hi Chris: You can use only one server for DHCP purposes, and you must to enable the ip helper-address option in each of the interfaces of the router, I mean: Int vlan1 ip address ip1 mask1 ip helper-address ip-address-of-dhcp-server-Primary ip helper-address ip-address-of-dhcp-server-Secondary Int vlan2 ip address ip2 mask2 ip helper-address ip-address-of-dhcp-server-Primary ip helper-address ip-address-of-dhcp-server-Secondary Int vlann ip address ipn maskn ip helper-address ip-address-of-dhcp-server-Primary ip helper-address ip-address-of-dhcp-server-Secondary In this case, we are using two DHCP servers in different locations (just in failure case), but you can use one, two, whatever). Regards: Marcos Pacheco. Routing and Switching CCNP. --- Chris Sees [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribi?: HI, Does anyone have suggestions for implementing DHCP in an enterprise environment that wants to use VLAN's (for administratve, regular users, etc. - for security purposes) and DHCP at the same time? It seems like you would need multiple DHCP servers (carefully placed). ? Thanks in advance. Chris _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Obtenga su direcci?n de correo-e gratis @yahoo.com en http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Switch Problem
Do a "sh ver" and it should tell you how it was recycledpower-on, memory error, etc this may tell you a great deal. roger -Original Message- From: Stuart J Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 09:54 To: Cisco Subject: Switch Problem Hi, Many of my users have been reporting network connectivity disapearing and comming back about a min later. While looking through the logs of one switch (a 2924M-CL-EN) I noticed it had been rebooted recently. What would make a switch reboot itself? The switch isn't anywhere near capacity (according to the scale on the front). Any help greatly appreciated __ Stuart J Pittwood, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stuartpittwood.net _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISP's
I am the NOC manager for an ISP and we've done this in the past. It's called multihoming and it's really not as difficult as some might argue, but I suppose that depends on your circumstances. Honestly, don't attempt anything until you've read Halabi ch 7 and the related configs in the back, at a minimum. Things to keep in mind are: load balancing vs. failover, router memory (full vs. local/partial routes), inbound traffic flow, outbound traffic flow (you can use route-maps to set local preference, prepend AS #'s etc). Also a search on cco for bgp multihoming will yield a bounty of information. - Abe ""Atul Kumar Udupi"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings, Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doing things backwards - Question for the CCDPs in the list.
IMHO as the CCDA exam stands, if you have a basic understanding of networking the "Cisco way" (ie CCNA) and more importantly have good proficiency with English, it'll be a breeze. After the exam I was actually disappointed I got a couple questions wrong! heh I also realized why the pass:fail ratio is as poor as it's rumoured to be. Native English speakers have a huge advantage when taking this exam in English. If you've taken a number of technical exams before and are good at reading into questions you can almost always eliminate some of the distracters and select the key just by reading the question... you don't even really need the case study most of the time. Still, I loved the preparation process for the CCDA exam. Reading the DCN text and Priscilla's Top Down Network Design till I felt I really understood them is professionally one of the best things I've ever done for myself. There's a LOT to mull over and understand there, especially in Top Down Network Design. I guess that's why I thought the exam itself was such a letdown. The steps leading up to it were so fascinating and relevant. I remember discussing it with my fellow techie geek fiancee afterwards and calling the CCDA just "CCNA + reading comprehension". Long story short if you're a CCNP, have prepared for CID, and work in the field it shouldn't be much of a problem at all. That's my rant for the day, Brandon - CCNP+YPK :) based on discussion over the last week, maybe Cisco should make "+YPK" and "+OGC" specializations? :) -Original Message- From: Miller, Nathan - BSC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Doing things backwards - Question for the CCDPs in the list. I know that this is not the list for CCDA questions but I hope that you will humor me. I have recently completed CCNP and studied with another engineer who was already CCDA certified. We studied for the CID (640-025) exam together and I passed this exam today. My question is this: Is the DCN (CCDA) exam sufficiently different from the CID that I will need to study for it separately or will the prep for the CID exam suffice. Thanks in advance for your advice. Nathan Miller, CCNP Enterprise Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare West 602-307-2659 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading from T1 to t3
Since your current connection is a T1 you have a serial port (with or without integrated DSU) with the max speed of 2mbps. This will not be sufficient for the T3 (and the connector is different) If you have a 7500 series router you can get an internal T3 mod. with an integrated DSU. Anything less you'll need to pick up an HSSI mod. plus an external DSU/CSU. Configuration is failry straight forward and you can find it on CCO. Moe. p.s. I think the lowest router that supports the HSSI is a 3600 series. --- Jatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI , Can any one help me in knowing what changes will be involved ine terms of hardware , software and configuration changes when up grading the serial link from T1 to T3 Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = _ Moe Tavakoli __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem.
You should be able to Ping the inside interface of your PIX. You can not ping an outside interface. There must be route statements in your PIX so that it knows where to send the reply. At 08:52 AM 03/02/2001 -0500, Nabil Fares wrote: Rob, By default PIX does not allow pings! You can have connectivity though it but, you can't ping it. You have to create an access list allowing icmp. Of course thing assuming its not a subnetting issue. Cisco recommends this access-list be used for testing purposes only, remove when done. HTH, Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Cabeca Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:37 PM To: groupstudy Subject: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem. You guys have always been on target for me. I am hoping you give some insight to this. (the following addresses have been slightly altered for obvious reasons but they are true to the real ones). Overview. I am upgrading a network which has a 155.102.0.0 255.255.0.0 network. It is flat. I have implemented a new IP Scheme to be used in several VLAN's and am trying to migrate to it. IP range is 10.25.192.0 - 10.25.223.254 broken up into several /24's. There are 600 devices. Now to the nitty gritty. Network Description The 6506 has seven VLAN's configured as follows: VLAN 1 - 10.25.223.2 /24 Primary 155.102.127.26 /16 secondary. VLAN 2 - 10.25.215.254 /24 VLAN 3 - 10.25.216.254 /24 to - VLAN 7 - 10.25.220.254 /24 There are 2 2600's which are routing to an ASP. Their addresses are router A - 10.25.223.3 B - .4 with .5 as HSRP. There is a Pix 515 using address 155.102.18.191 Nating to the internet. The 2600's have an extended access list on them which directs Port 80 traffic from the 159.102.x.x network between the ASP WAN and the internet. They are also doing NAT from the ASP to the 155.102.x.x network. 1 class C NAT pool for each router. A- 10.25.213.0 /24, B - 10.25.214.0 /24. Problem I cannot ping the firewall interface from the MFSC or the 6506 or from any workstation that is using ANY of the VLAN default gateways. I have full connectivity to the asp wan. I have full connectivity to the other VLAN's. When devices use the 2600's HSRP address as default gateway, they have access to the firewall, the asp and the VLAN's. I have no access to the 2600's as they do not belong to us. I spoke with the Cisco TAC a few times. They gave up and wouldn't escalate it because they could not find our service contract that we purchased. They were anxious to close the case. The trick to this migration is to maintain connectivity to all devices as they are being migrated to the new IP scheme. I will be very grateful to any serious replies to this situation. Thanks for your expertise! Rob _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Darren S. Crawford - CCNA Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.comhttp://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TCP Load Balancing with a PIX
Another thing to try if you don't have a large budget is load balancing on a Linux box. Check out: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ From: "Mark Holloway" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Mark Holloway" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP Load Balancing with a PIX Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:36:15 -0800 The "industry standard" at this point is the Foundry Server Iron. It has the F5 load balancing software built into it. I've deployed the 8-port 10/100 and it works great. It costs approximately $10,000 which is almost half the price of a Local Director. It provides load balancing for http, http, real, and so many more. Unfortunately the PIX does not load balance. You cannot map an "outside/internet" IP address to multiple "inside/lan" IP addresses. If these are NT server you could also use Microsoft Load Balancing which works. Lastly, you can use Round Robin DNS which doesn't cost anything. Regards, Mark Sprint Business Marketing Group Las Vegas, NV. "Jim Barksdale" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I know using a Router and NAT you can map a single external address to a virtual host with an internal address, which then load balances across several real hosts. (TCP Load Balancing) Can the same thing be done on a PIX? I currently have 1 web server on the DMZ and want to add a second web server (mirror of the first). I then want to load balance across the two of them. I don't have the budget to buy a 'Local Director'. Thanks for your help Jim _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIXes and Microsoft CA
Hello Alejandro, I have never seen what you have described, but I have gotten this to work and here's a couple things I remember I had to do: 1) Cisco recommends at least ver 5.2(x) -- I was unable to get VPN clients AND the PIX to work together with version 5.1(2) (although they could both get RA certificates from the CA Server) 2) When installing the MS CA server, select Advanced options and make sure the keys are 512. Same for the MSCEP RA setup. 3) For MSCEP and setting up the RA, I filled in the fields with the exact same information I filled in the CA fields with. 4) Make sure you can view http://10.0.0.2:/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll from your web browser, and even make sure the fingerprint it shows is the fingerprint you get in your debugs:8698efea 67ec44a8 5c3abb18 a3b3da54 Those are just a few things I can think of right now... Jeff Friday, March 02, 2001, 6:44:17 AM, you wrote: AN Having problems configuring the Microsoft CA for giving certificates to a AN PIX. AN I am trying to configure microsoft CA Certificate Server with the PIX, and I AN am unable to obtain the CA or RA certificate, so, the certificate request AN fails. AN I have followed the instructions I found in the Instutor site, but it AN doesn't work for me. AN First, I installed the CA in standalone mode, and gave a certificate to it. AN Later I took the cepsetup.exe from the Windows 2000 resource toolkit and AN intalled SCEP support for Microsoft CA. I was requested to enter the AN information for a RA certificate, so I did. After reseting, of course, I AN typed the following commands from the pix: AN clock set "current time, the same as in the CA" AN ip domain-name example.com AN ip hostname pix AN ca generate rsa key 512 AN ca identity alexnap 10.0.0.2:/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll AN ca configure alexnap ra 1 5 crloptional AN and NOW. AN when I type ca authenticate alexnap I obtanin the following AN sanjose(config)# ca authenticate alexnap AN C AN IC trhryeadp tsol eCeAp st!hread wakes up! AN CRYPTO_PKI: http connection opened AN PKI: key process suspended and continued AN CRYPTO_PKI: WARNING: A certificate chain could not be constructed while AN selecting AN certificate status AN CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. AN CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. AN CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. AN CRYPTO_PKI: WARNING: A certificate chain could not be constructed while AN selecting AN certificate status AN CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. AN CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. AN CRYPTO_PKI: Can not get name ava count AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not decode router sub name. AN CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key AN CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key AN CRYPTO_PKI: transaction GetCACert completed AN Certificate has the following attributes: AN Fingerprint: 8698efea 67ec44a8 5c3abb18 a3b3da54 AN CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key AN CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to get ca name from cert AN CRYPTO_PKI: can not set ra public key AN Crypto CA thread sleeps! AN CI thread wakes AN INDICATING ME THAT THE RA AND CA PUBLIC KEYS COULD NOT BE SET. AN NOW WHEN I REQUEST A CERTIFICATE..I OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE AN FROM THE DEBUG CRYPTO CA.. AN sanjose(config)# CA ENROLL ALEXNAP CISCO AN % AN C%r Sytaprtto cCeAr titfihcraetaed enroll mweankt .. AN % Thee subject names in utphe ce!rtificate will be: AN sanjose.softneteurope.com AN CI thread sleeps! AN CI thread wakes up!% Certificate request sent to Certificate Authority AN % The certificate request fingerprint will be displayed. AN sanjose(config)# AN sanjose(config)# AN sanjose(config)# AN CRYPTO_PKI: transaction PKCSReq completed AN CRYPTO_PKI: status: AN Crypto CA thread sleeps! AN CRYPTO_PKI: status = 0: failed to select RA encrypt cert AN CRYPTO_PKI: status = 65535: failed to set up peer auth context AN CRYPTO_PKI: status = 65535: fail to send out pkcsreq AN CRYPTO__PKI: All sockets are closed. AN WHAT IS GOING ON HERE, ANY HELP, OR SHOULD WE CHANGE THE CA OR SHOULD WE AN CONSTRUCT THE VPN WITH WINDOWS 2000 ( A SHAME) AN _ AN FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html AN Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FW: Change in CCIE Lab Price
I guess if they want to raise the price that is fine, but what stinks is that people that already signed up with the understanding that they would pay $1000.00 USD at least 28 days before the lab, are now told they have to add another 250.00 bucks, unless they can scrape up the cash before March 31. Cisco needs to work focus on the stability of their product line instead of trying to make a few bucks on lab candidates. Core routers are being replaced by Junipers more and more, looks like it is time to get cracking on that JNCIE. /n Dennis Laganiere wrote: I just got this, which may be of interest to some... - March 1, 2001 Dear CCIE Candidate, We are contacting you to confirm that you are currently scheduled for a CCIE lab exam and that we will soon be implementing some program changes that may have an impact upon you. After a rigorous evaluation of our current cost structure, we find it necessary to increase our CCIE Lab exam fee to reflect our current cost of doing business. The present $1,000 lab fee has been in effect since the CCIE organization was first launched in 1993. Effective on April 1, 2001, we will begin charging customers $1,250 US per lab attempt, (plus any applicable local taxes). Since you have already received an email confirmation from Cisco regarding the current lab fee of $1,000 US (plus any applicable taxes), we would be happy to honor that price as long as we receive payment no later than March 31, 2001. If we receive payment from you following that date, the new lab fee will apply. If you decide to pay after April 1, 2001 this email will also serve as a new confirmation. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With WCCP
Hi, I am using a Cache machine with WCCP version 1. My network is having 1 uplink and 2 downlinks. My network structure is as follows. Let me say A, B are the existing links, where A is with Uplink and downlink, and B Downlink only. Group X -- Will use Uplink through A and Downlink through A only Group Y -- Will use Uplink through A and Downlink through B Now My cache as well as my router are on 'Group X'. If I make the changes such that cache and router will come to 'Group Y', and also I want give the access to 'Group X' network also. Now my doubt is if I give the access to cache for 'Group X', does they are able browse? Is it faster? (I am sure that B is faster than A). Is there any better way to approch.. But I don't want to keep entire 'Group X' on B. Thanks, Kiran _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Better do those V-labs while you can
I heard a while back they decided to do training only (no more network services). Any idea who they cut? Programmers or networkers? "Mask Of Zorro" wrote in message ... It was a bloodbath over at Metntor Technologies this morning - another big RIF. Better do those V-labs while they are still available... looks like it won't be long. Z _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Better do those V-labs while you can
I'm taking BSCN on-line w/ them and it's a total joke. Sounds like I'd better JUMP on those v-labs right away. THANKS!!! mL -Original Message- From: Matt Holbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Better do those V-labs while you can I heard a while back they decided to do training only (no more network services). Any idea who they cut? Programmers or networkers? "Mask Of Zorro" wrote in message ... It was a bloodbath over at Metntor Technologies this morning - another big RIF. Better do those V-labs while they are still available... looks like it won't be long. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CID! (Some parting shots....)
Totally agreed! This look like a huge issues. Any resolution outthere? :P Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brent Ulfig Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Passed CID! (Some parting shots) I'll agree with you on the whole "lack of happiness" thing. The more tests I take...the less I'm happy about it when I'm done. Go figure... Cheerz- Brent "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I passed, but I received by FAR the lowest score of any Cisco exam I've taken. I was worried that I might have failed it, but I squeaked through somehow. I must agree with others who have mentioned how awful this test is. Sheesh... These were some of the most vague questions and answers that I've ever seen. This is definitely a test where you need to master the art of answering questions the "Cisco Way (tm)." Interestingly, I received a 0% on spotting security issues, which was amusing. :-) I only remember about four security questions and I feel that I got at least two of those correct, while one of them was almost incomprehensible. The SNA kicked my hiney, as well. I even have some experience with it from work and I supplemented that with the Sybex CID study guide and still did not prepare nearly enough for the types of questions I was asked. I only got 42% on the SNA section. The rest of the test was better for me. I think the other categories were all 75% or higher. Believe me, I was sweating big-time while the test was being graded. I was NOT looking forward to more preparation if I had to take it again. Also, there was a LOT of Windows/NetBIOS stuff. Learn it, live it, love it. I think that to do *really* well on this test, it's necessary to have hands-on experience with these protocols. It would be hard to prepare fully for these questions otherwise. I've noticed something else that maybe some of you can relate to. When I passed the CCNA test, I was absolutely ecstatic! I wanted to party all day. When I passed the DCN, I was very happy as well, but not quite as much as when I passed CCNA. I finished up CCNP a couple of weeks ago and felt more a sense of relief than of joy. The only reason my wife and I celebrated was that the next day was Valentine's day so we combined the two occasions. Tonight, after passing CCDP, I'm not even excited at all about it. Weird, huh? However, if I ever finish CCIE, I doubt there will be much of a lack of excitement. Then again, maybe I'm wrong. I think that for some of us, the joy comes in the pursuit, not the catch, and with every cert that we finish, that's one less trophy to hunt and we have to find something else to stay happy. Who knows, maybe after I finish up CCIE (sometime before 2005 g) I'll actually go back and finish up a college degree! :-) Okay, I'm rambling. I'll go to bed now. John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How would you Explain it.
You might want to be careful whose ego is damaged. Tell him to go to Yipes and he can meet his needs. They have a pure IP over fiber network with a native ethernet interface to the office. There is no need for telephony. Bandwidth is scalable from 1 Mbps to 1 Gbps bandwidth in 1 Mbps increments. And no, I don't work for them so this isn't a sales pitch. Keith Townsend wrote: I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. btw... I've gone ahead and gotten quotes on a t1 and t3 lines. I know I can use a 2600 for the T1 connection but what is there a adapter for taking a clear channel T3 for the 2600 or do I have to look at a 7000 series router. Thanks, Keith Townsend www.townsendconsulting.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch Problem
I would also suggest logging to an external box. Once the switch reboots you lose anything it might have told you about problem ports, etc., unless you have a logging server. You can use a simple free Unix box or search the archives for NT solutions. Andrew Cook - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Switch Problem Do a "sh ver" and it should tell you how it was recycledpower-on, memory error, etc this may tell you a great deal. roger -Original Message- From: Stuart J Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 09:54 To: Cisco Subject: Switch Problem Hi, Many of my users have been reporting network connectivity disapearing and comming back about a min later. While looking through the logs of one switch (a 2924M-CL-EN) I noticed it had been rebooted recently. What would make a switch reboot itself? The switch isn't anywhere near capacity (according to the scale on the front). Any help greatly appreciated __ Stuart J Pittwood, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stuartpittwood.net _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How would you Explain it.
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Keith Townsend wrote: I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. Actually, there are several companies that claim to offer connectivity from 1Mbps up to 1Gbps delivered via ethernet. Cogent Communications is one such company, at http://www.cogentco.com/. I don't know if they're actually selling service and I have my doubts about their claims. Another company is Yipes, at http://www.yipes.com/, offering scalable bandwidth from 1Mbps to 1Gbps. They seem to have a decent business plan and a reasonable infrastructure, but again, I can't speak for their actual service. This doesn't address any other misconceptions that your client may have regarding WAN bandwidth, but there you go. Ben _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How would you Explain it.
I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. I wouldn't say he is totally out of his mind, if he's in a geographic area served by one of the bleeding edge Optical Ethernet providers. Very rare so far, but there are 100 or 1000 Mbps physical facilities over which the user pays for the amount of bandwidth he needs. Most of the ones I'm aware of are in Europe. In the vast majority of locations, he is out of his mind. Assuming he needs 10 Mbps, your choices include inverse multiplexed T1 and ATM, fractional T3, or 10 Mbps over OC-3 facilities. I had a design not too long ago where we were able to bring in some of the voice as well, and found that OC-3 was quite cost-effective. It ran into a 7200. A 3600 is probably the lowest end router to consider. btw... I've gone ahead and gotten quotes on a t1 and t3 lines. I know I can use a 2600 for the T1 connection but what is there a adapter for taking a clear channel T3 for the 2600 or do I have to look at a 7000 series router. Thanks, Keith Townsend www.townsendconsulting.com \ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay Charges
Greetings all, Can you guys shed some light on how FR providers base their charges. How they charge when going above CIR (etc...)? also, if I have site with network access between 8-5, is it worth risking a zero CIR? We had a meeting with an account rep for a FR provider, he kept pressing on 0 CIR. This is a new trend? Thanks, Nabil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HH EE LL PP !!
We have a wireless Internet distribution. Our radios plug into a 3600 Cis= co. We keep getting this error = "00:26:50: %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error" This did not happen before. This slows down the Internet Access the eventually throws everyone off. Please HELP Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 Received: from 204.68.23.64 by nwcst319 for [63.109.248.105] via web-mailer(34FM.0700.16.05) on Fri Mar 2 18:57:43 GMT 2001 Date: 2 Mar 2001 11:57:43 MST From: Charles Nunie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HHEELLPP!! X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34FM.0700.16.05) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have a wireless Internet distribution. Our radios plug into a 3600 Cis= co. We keep getting this error = "00:26:50: AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error" This did not happen before. This slows down the Internet Access the event= ually throws everyone off. Please HELP Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HH EE LL PP !!
Late collisions are almost always the result of duplex mismatch. Check both devices and manually set them to what you want instead of relying on auto-detect. There have been a lot of threads recently about similar issues, and everyone seems to agree that auto-detect doesn't work well - even between devices by the same vendor! Andrew Cook - Original Message - From: "Charles Nunie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:26 PM Subject: HH EE LL PP !! We have a wireless Internet distribution. Our radios plug into a 3600 Cis= co. We keep getting this error = "00:26:50: %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error" This did not happen before. This slows down the Internet Access the eventually throws everyone off. Please HELP Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 Received: from 204.68.23.64 by nwcst319 for [63.109.248.105] via web-mailer(34FM.0700.16.05) on Fri Mar 2 18:57:43 GMT 2001 Date: 2 Mar 2001 11:57:43 MST From: Charles Nunie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HHEELLPP!! X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34FM.0700.16.05) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have a wireless Internet distribution. Our radios plug into a 3600 Cis= co. We keep getting this error = "00:26:50: AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error" This did not happen before. This slows down the Internet Access the event= ually throws everyone off. Please HELP Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 ISP's
Terminating 2 ISP links on the same router will not require BGP. Just use floating static default routes and load balance out the two links. If you own your own AS (public AS), then use BGP for advertisement only. Vince Oleh Hrynchuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Larry Lamb wrote: Well what type of router are you looking to deploy? This will significantly influence your decision on what type of routing/connectivity that you'll use. Full BGP tables can chew up a lot of memory. Looking a the Mae-East Looking Glass at Digex, they're using almost 30MB. That's going to require a router with 64MB more like 128MB of memory. second is true. 64 Mb isn't enough already since several months ago. A lot of this type of configuration will be covered in Internet Routing Architectures by Halabi. It's a Cisco Press title. Generally, I would want to say that answer for the question needs real knowledge about several internetworking area. What about propagating of [sub]networks? Whom and what? What about negotiating with both ISP about policy routing and other staff? (I have some experience with working in a ISP as system engineer and can say that it isn't so easy) So, resume is (IMHO): theoretically it is possible of course. But in practice let's say, it is not easy so far... CHEERS, ;-) OLEH "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97o0uf$pmu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... can u give me some more info please "Larry Lamb" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:97o0hs$p33$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Yep, you can do a lot of different things with routing as well depending on the memory available, etc. Full BGP from both, full BGP from one with a floating static route, etc. "Atul Kumar Udupi" wrote in message 97nsnb$gr8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings, Hello All I would like to know , Is there any way to terminate 2 ISP's on a same cisco router and use them as a redundant link. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How would you Explain it.
Here in Tallahassee, we (Sprint) provide a Gigabit Ethernet MAN. Fiber to the customer prem, L2 or L3, MPLS/VPN for security. The backbone is Gig but we are currently only providing 100Mbps for access. Gig will probably come shortly, as our primary customer is the State of Florida and all of its component agencies - they sure love bandwidth! Andrew Cook - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:28 PM Subject: Re: How would you Explain it. I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. I wouldn't say he is totally out of his mind, if he's in a geographic area served by one of the bleeding edge Optical Ethernet providers. Very rare so far, but there are 100 or 1000 Mbps physical facilities over which the user pays for the amount of bandwidth he needs. Most of the ones I'm aware of are in Europe. In the vast majority of locations, he is out of his mind. Assuming he needs 10 Mbps, your choices include inverse multiplexed T1 and ATM, fractional T3, or 10 Mbps over OC-3 facilities. I had a design not too long ago where we were able to bring in some of the voice as well, and found that OC-3 was quite cost-effective. It ran into a 7200. A 3600 is probably the lowest end router to consider. btw... I've gone ahead and gotten quotes on a t1 and t3 lines. I know I can use a 2600 for the T1 connection but what is there a adapter for taking a clear channel T3 for the 2600 or do I have to look at a 7000 series router. Thanks, Keith Townsend www.townsendconsulting.com \ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPNing out of a LAN
Hi, Is it possible to configure our Pix 520 to be able to create a sole VPN connection on the LAN itself? In other words, we want to have one person connect to another VPN via his work computer on the company LAN. Right now we know that we cannot create a VPN connection from our desktops to another remote network while we are on our company network. But for one user, is it possible to configure PIX to allow him to go through our LAN/WAN without having him have to use a modem to dialup and go through an ISP? Any help would be appreciated! Thanks. Mark __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN client for windows 2000
You could use pptp in windows 2000 Chris Lemagie wrote: The v1.0 and 1.1 (IRE) clients are not supported on Windows 2000. We will be shipping the Windows 2000 version of our VPN client shortly. Michael Liu _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay Charges
The frame-relay provider I worked with before agreed to analyze the first months usage and go with using zero or 64K..whichever was going to be cheaper for us. But I made them agree to that before we chose a provider so the leverage was pretty high on my part to get things done. - Original Message - From: "Nabil Fares" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1:26 PM Subject: Frame Relay Charges Greetings all, Can you guys shed some light on how FR providers base their charges. How they charge when going above CIR (etc...)? also, if I have site with network access between 8-5, is it worth risking a zero CIR? We had a meeting with an account rep for a FR provider, he kept pressing on 0 CIR. This is a new trend? Thanks, Nabil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem.
Thanks for responding. I may not be understnading something here. If the firewall is on the same subnet and it's inside interface is connected to the 6506, what type of routing statement would it need? I am able to ping the inside interface of the firewall when the workstation is assigned to vlan 1 and is using 155.102.127.26 as the default gateway. once I asign the workstation to another vlan, it can ping everything in the 155 network EXCEPT for the firewall. Obviously I am confused. Thanks for your help. Any further thoughts would be appreciated. rob -Original Message- From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1211 To: Nabil Fares; Rob Cabeca; groupstudy Subject: RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem. You should be able to Ping the inside interface of your PIX. You can not ping an outside interface. There must be route statements in your PIX so that it knows where to send the reply. At 08:52 AM 03/02/2001 -0500, Nabil Fares wrote: Rob, By default PIX does not allow pings! You can have connectivity though it but, you can't ping it. You have to create an access list allowing icmp. Of course thing assuming its not a subnetting issue. Cisco recommends this access-list be used for testing purposes only, remove when done. HTH, Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Cabeca Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:37 PM To: groupstudy Subject: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem. You guys have always been on target for me. I am hoping you give some insight to this. (the following addresses have been slightly altered for obvious reasons but they are true to the real ones). Overview. I am upgrading a network which has a 155.102.0.0 255.255.0.0 network. It is flat. I have implemented a new IP Scheme to be used in several VLAN's and am trying to migrate to it. IP range is 10.25.192.0 - 10.25.223.254 broken up into several /24's. There are 600 devices. Now to the nitty gritty. Network Description The 6506 has seven VLAN's configured as follows: VLAN 1 - 10.25.223.2 /24 Primary 155.102.127.26 /16 secondary. VLAN 2 - 10.25.215.254 /24 VLAN 3 - 10.25.216.254 /24 to - VLAN 7 - 10.25.220.254 /24 There are 2 2600's which are routing to an ASP. Their addresses are router A - 10.25.223.3 B - .4 with .5 as HSRP. There is a Pix 515 using address 155.102.18.191 Nating to the internet. The 2600's have an extended access list on them which directs Port 80 traffic from the 159.102.x.x network between the ASP WAN and the internet. They are also doing NAT from the ASP to the 155.102.x.x network. 1 class C NAT pool for each router. A- 10.25.213.0 /24, B - 10.25.214.0 /24. Problem I cannot ping the firewall interface from the MFSC or the 6506 or from any workstation that is using ANY of the VLAN default gateways. I have full connectivity to the asp wan. I have full connectivity to the other VLAN's. When devices use the 2600's HSRP address as default gateway, they have access to the firewall, the asp and the VLAN's. I have no access to the 2600's as they do not belong to us. I spoke with the Cisco TAC a few times. They gave up and wouldn't escalate it because they could not find our service contract that we purchased. They were anxious to close the case. The trick to this migration is to maintain connectivity to all devices as they are being migrated to the new IP scheme. I will be very grateful to any serious replies to this situation. Thanks for your expertise! Rob _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Darren S. Crawford - CCNA Lucent Technologies Worldwide Services 2377 Gold Meadow WayPhone: (916) 859-5200 x310 Suite 230 Fax: (916) 859-5201 Sacramento, CA 95670Pager: (800) 467-1467 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Epager: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucent.com Network Systems Consultant _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPNing out of a LAN
sounds like you just need to let ISAKMP and ESP packets to/from that particular host. you may have some issues if you are using private address space behind the pix. m N wrote: Hi, Is it possible to configure our Pix 520 to be able to create a sole VPN connection on the LAN itself? In other words, we want to have one person connect to another VPN via his work computer on the company LAN. Right now we know that we cannot create a VPN connection from our desktops to another remote network while we are on our company network. But for one user, is it possible to configure PIX to allow him to go through our LAN/WAN without having him have to use a modem to dialup and go through an ISP? Any help would be appreciated! Thanks. Mark __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN client for windows 2000
You wouldn't be able to authenticate to a Cisco Router running IPsec, using DES and MD5. -Original Message- From: michael liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VPN client for windows 2000 You could use pptp in windows 2000 Chris Lemagie wrote: The v1.0 and 1.1 (IRE) clients are not supported on Windows 2000. We will be shipping the Windows 2000 version of our VPN client shortly. Michael Liu _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPNing out of a LAN
Mark, I just got some help from the group, and cooked up a config to support this exact solution you are looking into. email me off-line, and I can send you the config. jason -Original Message- From: Gordon T. White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 3:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPNing out of a LAN sounds like you just need to let ISAKMP and ESP packets to/from that particular host. you may have some issues if you are using private address space behind the pix. m N wrote: Hi, Is it possible to configure our Pix 520 to be able to create a sole VPN connection on the LAN itself? In other words, we want to have one person connect to another VPN via his work computer on the company LAN. Right now we know that we cannot create a VPN connection from our desktops to another remote network while we are on our company network. But for one user, is it possible to configure PIX to allow him to go through our LAN/WAN without having him have to use a modem to dialup and go through an ISP? Any help would be appreciated! Thanks. Mark __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RE: HH EE LL PP !!]
Thanx a million. There was a an interface mismatch. Were ok now. "McMasters, Eric" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Verify that both devices are set to the same duplex either half or full. Don't trust the auto settings because they usually don't work. Hard set the interfaces at each end to 100Mb full duplex and this will eliminate the possibility of collisions. Let me know how it works. Eric -Original Message- From: Charles Nunie To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3/2/01 12:26 PM Subject: HH EE LL PP !! We have a wireless Internet distribution. Our radios plug into a 3600 Cis= co. We keep getting this error = "00:26:50: %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error" This did not happen before. This slows down the Internet Access the eventually throws everyone off. Please HELP Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 Received: from 204.68.23.64 by nwcst319 for [63.109.248.105] via web-mailer(34FM.0700.16.05) on Fri Mar 2 18:57:43 GMT 2001 Date: 2 Mar 2001 11:57:43 MST From: Charles Nunie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HHEELLPP!! X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34FM.0700.16.05) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have a wireless Internet distribution. Our radios plug into a 3600 Cis= co. We keep getting this error = "00:26:50: AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error" This did not happen before. This slows down the Internet Access the event= ually throws everyone off. Please HELP Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D= 1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GROUPSTUDY REGISTRATION
Hello everyone, My pal wants to join in on this studygroup but the web page is off. Any help? Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secondary IP addressing
I am setting up secondary IPs on two of my serial interfaces. I can ping both IPs on ROUTER B from the other ROUTER A. The problem is that I cannot ping the secondary IP on ROUTER A from ROUTER B. What would cause this? Router A int serial 0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip address 128.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary Router B int serial 0 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip address 128.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How would you Explain it.
Depending on what area you are at Adelphia will sell them a 10mg connection. -Original Message- From: Ben Hockenhull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:20 PM To: Keith Townsend Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How would you Explain it. On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Keith Townsend wrote: I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. Actually, there are several companies that claim to offer connectivity from 1Mbps up to 1Gbps delivered via ethernet. Cogent Communications is one such company, at http://www.cogentco.com/. I don't know if they're actually selling service and I have my doubts about their claims. Another company is Yipes, at http://www.yipes.com/, offering scalable bandwidth from 1Mbps to 1Gbps. They seem to have a decent business plan and a reasonable infrastructure, but again, I can't speak for their actual service. This doesn't address any other misconceptions that your client may have regarding WAN bandwidth, but there you go. Ben _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem.
It sounds like your PIX doesn't know about 10.25.192.0/19 subnets. It knows about the directly-connected 155 subnet, but not any past the 6506. It seems like you'll need some routes on the PIX (but I'm not really familiar with those boxes). Your PIX is probably defaulting to its outside interface. You need a route for 10.25.192.0/19 to 155.102.127.26 (if that is the 6506) on the PIX. Andrew Cook - Original Message - From: "Rob Cabeca" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Darren Crawford" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Nabil Fares" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Rob Cabeca" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "groupstudy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 3:27 PM Subject: RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem. Thanks for responding. I may not be understnading something here. If the firewall is on the same subnet and it's inside interface is connected to the 6506, what type of routing statement would it need? I am able to ping the inside interface of the firewall when the workstation is assigned to vlan 1 and is using 155.102.127.26 as the default gateway. once I asign the workstation to another vlan, it can ping everything in the 155 network EXCEPT for the firewall. Obviously I am confused. Thanks for your help. Any further thoughts would be appreciated. rob -Original Message- From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 1211 To: Nabil Fares; Rob Cabeca; groupstudy Subject: RE: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem. You should be able to Ping the inside interface of your PIX. You can not ping an outside interface. There must be route statements in your PIX so that it knows where to send the reply. At 08:52 AM 03/02/2001 -0500, Nabil Fares wrote: Rob, By default PIX does not allow pings! You can have connectivity though it but, you can't ping it. You have to create an access list allowing icmp. Of course thing assuming its not a subnetting issue. Cisco recommends this access-list be used for testing purposes only, remove when done. HTH, Nabil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Cabeca Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 9:37 PM To: groupstudy Subject: Help!, because Cisco says they can't. Firewall Vlan problem. You guys have always been on target for me. I am hoping you give some insight to this. (the following addresses have been slightly altered for obvious reasons but they are true to the real ones). Overview. I am upgrading a network which has a 155.102.0.0 255.255.0.0 network. It is flat. I have implemented a new IP Scheme to be used in several VLAN's and am trying to migrate to it. IP range is 10.25.192.0 - 10.25.223.254 broken up into several /24's. There are 600 devices. Now to the nitty gritty. Network Description The 6506 has seven VLAN's configured as follows: VLAN 1 - 10.25.223.2 /24 Primary 155.102.127.26 /16 secondary. VLAN 2 - 10.25.215.254 /24 VLAN 3 - 10.25.216.254 /24 to - VLAN 7 - 10.25.220.254 /24 There are 2 2600's which are routing to an ASP. Their addresses are router A - 10.25.223.3 B - .4 with .5 as HSRP. There is a Pix 515 using address 155.102.18.191 Nating to the internet. The 2600's have an extended access list on them which directs Port 80 traffic from the 159.102.x.x network between the ASP WAN and the internet. They are also doing NAT from the ASP to the 155.102.x.x network. 1 class C NAT pool for each router. A- 10.25.213.0 /24, B - 10.25.214.0 /24. Problem I cannot ping the firewall interface from the MFSC or the 6506 or from any workstation that is using ANY of the VLAN default gateways. I have full connectivity to the asp wan. I have full connectivity to the other VLAN's. When devices use the 2600's HSRP address as default gateway, they have access to the firewall, the asp and the VLAN's. I have no access to the 2600's as they do not belong to us. I spoke with the Cisco TAC a few times. They gave up and wouldn't escalate it because they could not find our service contract that we purchased. They were anxious to close the case. The trick to this migration is to maintain connectivity to all devices as they are being migrated to the new IP scheme. I will be very grateful to any serious replies to this situation. Thanks for your expertise! Rob _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Darren S. Crawford - CCNA
Re: GROUPSTUDY REGISTRATION
Charles Nunie wrote: Hello everyone, My pal wants to join in on this studygroup but the web page is off. Any help? About as much chance as I have of dumping my shares of Transmeta for anything less than a huge loss in the next 5 years... We all have to learn patience sooner or later. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How would you Explain it.
Another to look into is Telseon (we just used them and they are great.) I would approach him him possible solution: T1 T3 OC-3 And solutions from the fiber types (as stated before) Then let him decide what he can afford. Make sure to put ht eassociated hardware costs on paper for him too. For the T3 you'll need something that can support a HSSI or DS-3 port (I think the 3600 series supports the HSSI and OC-3, then 7500 is the first place I can remember for the DS-3 w/DSU integrated, others you'll need an external CSU/DSU) --- Ben Hockenhull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Keith Townsend wrote: I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. Actually, there are several companies that claim to offer connectivity from 1Mbps up to 1Gbps delivered via ethernet. Cogent Communications is one such company, at http://www.cogentco.com/. I don't know if they're actually selling service and I have my doubts about their claims. Another company is Yipes, at http://www.yipes.com/, offering scalable bandwidth from 1Mbps to 1Gbps. They seem to have a decent business plan and a reasonable infrastructure, but again, I can't speak for their actual service. This doesn't address any other misconceptions that your client may have regarding WAN bandwidth, but there you go. Ben _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = _ Moe Tavakoli __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2500 series e0 fullduplex?
Yeah u r right ,i checked it I was confused thanx for correction budy :) Eric Fairfield wrote: 100 Mb FE still falls under CSMA/CD rules especially when using a Fast Ethernet Hub that doesn't support Full duplex. There can and will be collisions at 100Mb Fast Ethernet in a shared environment. -- Eric Fairfield CCIE #6413 "SAIF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... well its not a terminology thing u see its understood when u use 100mbps its then not csma/cd ethernet thing ,they made it like thre will be no collisions and speed will be 10 times than 10 mbps yes u r right on 36xx router there is full/half/auto duplex but u didnt get the idea ,its basically technology which is sensing which media is supported to that interface ,if it is 10mbps then interface will make it half duplex ethernet and i it is 100mbs it will make it fast ethernet full duplex and u have choice to make it half/full duplex by ur choice according to ur existing medium and toplogy THAT PORT MUST BE NOT A FASTETHERNET PORT BUT IT CAN BE IF U USE IT IN 100MBPS WAY THERE IS ANOTHER THING YES IT IS POSSIBL I AGREE U CAN WORK 10BASE T (ONLY NOT COAXIAL) WITH FULL DUPLEX BUT THE THING IS THAT WHAT I WAS POINTING THAT CISCO PRODUCTS USUALLY DONT SUPPORTFULL DUPLEX WITH 10MBPS AM I WRONG ? Neil Schneider wrote: Sorry but you are incorrect. (unless we just have a terminology difference here) Just becuase you are running 100mbps. it is not automatically full duplex. the Fastethernet ports on routers (3640 seriesfor example) can be set to full/half/auto duplex. why bother with a half duplex setting if all fastethernet is full duplex? -- Neil Schneider MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP "SAIF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 100mbps is not ethernet be sure its fast ethernet ,also their is no collisions in fast ethernet ,its colliision free and this is only possible if u have one way to send and one way to recieve data simultaneously :) i am sure u got the idea secondly in ethernet there are collisions and if there are colliisions Can u use one to send and one way to recieve simultaneously with collisions so if u cant the result is ethernet works in half duplex mode and fast ethernnet works in full duplex if u have any thing different than me plz share with us waiting ur reply Saif Neil Schneider wrote: It is NOT true that ethernet is half and fastethernet is full duplex. Either 10Mbps or 100Mbps ehternet can be run in half or full duplex mode. And offhand I don't know if the 2500 AUI port will do full ethernet. -- Neil Schneider MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP "SAIF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... NO ITS ETHERNET PORT AND WORKING HALF DUPLEX ONLY ,U SEE CISCO GIVES FASTETHERNET PORTS SPECIALLY IN THEIR ROUTERS SPECIALLY IN 4XXX SERIES AND U KNOW ETHERNET WORKS IN HALF DUPLEX AND FASTETHERNET WORKS IN FULL DUPLEX SO THE RESULT IS AUI PORT IS HALF DUPLEX ETHERNET NOT AUTO SENSE AND IF U WANT AUTOSENSE 10/100 BASE T GO TO ANY OTHER ROUTER ,CHECK THE ROUTER;S MANUAL :) HOPT IT WILL HELP IS IT ? Turfis wrote: Is the Ethernet AUI port on the 2500 series Cisco routers Full Duplex compatible? Does it autonegoiate? Can you hard code the interface for half/full/auto? Thanks! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Re: 2500 series e0 fullduplex?
Sorry i didnt know the rules of this class teacher :) Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Your message is probably being routed to the null interface for most of us because it's not comprehensible. Please use sentences, punctuation, and full words, i.e. "you" instead of "u." Please don't use all caps, though please do capitalize the first letter of a sentence. Those are the de facto protocols that we have generally agreed on in this forum to increase communications. I know I probably sound like a school teacher, but I am serious. We need these protocols in order to communicate effectively. Thank-you. Priscilla At 03:58 AM 3/1/01, SAIF wrote: well its not a terminology thing u see its understood when u use 100mbps its then not csma/cd ethernet thing ,they made it like thre will be no collisions and speed will be 10 times than 10 mbps yes u r right on 36xx router there is full/half/auto duplex but u didnt get the idea ,its basically technology which is sensing which media is supported to that interface ,if it is 10mbps then interface will make it half duplex ethernet and i it is 100mbs it will make it fast ethernet full duplex and u have choice to make it half/full duplex by ur choice according to ur existing medium and toplogy THAT PORT MUST BE NOT A FASTETHERNET PORT BUT IT CAN BE IF U USE IT IN 100MBPS WAY THERE IS ANOTHER THING YES IT IS POSSIBL I AGREE U CAN WORK 10BASE T (ONLY NOT COAXIAL) WITH FULL DUPLEX BUT THE THING IS THAT WHAT I WAS POINTING THAT CISCO PRODUCTS USUALLY DONT SUPPORTFULL DUPLEX WITH 10MBPS AM I WRONG ? Neil Schneider wrote: Sorry but you are incorrect. (unless we just have a terminology difference here) Just becuase you are running 100mbps. it is not automatically full duplex. the Fastethernet ports on routers (3640 seriesfor example) can be set to full/half/auto duplex. why bother with a half duplex setting if all fastethernet is full duplex? -- Neil Schneider MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP "SAIF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... 100mbps is not ethernet be sure its fast ethernet ,also their is no collisions in fast ethernet ,its colliision free and this is only possible if u have one way to send and one way to recieve data simultaneously :) i am sure u got the idea secondly in ethernet there are collisions and if there are colliisions Can u use one to send and one way to recieve simultaneously with collisions so if u cant the result is ethernet works in half duplex mode and fast ethernnet works in full duplex if u have any thing different than me plz share with us waiting ur reply Saif Neil Schneider wrote: It is NOT true that ethernet is half and fastethernet is full duplex. Either 10Mbps or 100Mbps ehternet can be run in half or full duplex mode. And offhand I don't know if the 2500 AUI port will do full ethernet. -- Neil Schneider MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP "SAIF" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... NO ITS ETHERNET PORT AND WORKING HALF DUPLEX ONLY ,U SEE CISCO GIVES FASTETHERNET PORTS SPECIALLY IN THEIR ROUTERS SPECIALLY IN 4XXX SERIES AND U KNOW ETHERNET WORKS IN HALF DUPLEX AND FASTETHERNET WORKS IN FULL DUPLEX SO THE RESULT IS AUI PORT IS HALF DUPLEX ETHERNET NOT AUTO SENSE AND IF U WANT AUTOSENSE 10/100 BASE T GO TO ANY OTHER ROUTER ,CHECK THE ROUTER;S MANUAL :) HOPT IT WILL HELP IS IT ? Turfis wrote: Is the Ethernet AUI port on the 2500 series Cisco routers Full Duplex compatible? Does it autonegoiate? Can you hard code the interface for half/full/auto? Thanks! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and
WIC - Revisited
Approximately one week ago someone mentioned that they knew of somewhere that they could get used WIC cards for $130. I would like to know if that person (or any other member for that matter) could stare me in the direction on how to obtain affordable WIC cards for a cisco 2525 router I would really appreciate it. Thanks Ray _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipsec and cisco
Does anyone know of any books that goes over implementing ipsec on cisco = equipment ?? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC - Revisited
eBay comes to mind. Sometimes requires patience for something to show up. Check in the back of the standard Network related trade magazines for dealers in used Cisco. -Original Message- From: Ray Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 4:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WIC - Revisited Approximately one week ago someone mentioned that they knew of somewhere that they could get used WIC cards for $130. I would like to know if that person (or any other member for that matter) could stare me in the direction on how to obtain affordable WIC cards for a cisco 2525 router I would really appreciate it. Thanks Ray _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MICHEAL VICCHIOLLO
I am looking for a guy that has posted to this board by the name of Micheal Vicchiollo, if you played softball while in the Marines during 87-90 contact me Ed King [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another Frame-relay issue..
Phil, Had no problems with this before.. on All my other labs.. I don't believe the problem was on the AGS+(w/ 11.0(22) code.. Nigel. From: "Virnoche, Phil" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Virnoche, Phil" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Nigel Taylor'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],Cisco Group Study [EMAIL PROTECTED],CCIE_Lab Group Study [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Another Frame-relay issue.. Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 07:23:23 -0800 Sounds like an improper LMI type,. LMI doesn't autosense on 11.0 code. -Original Message- From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:57 AM To: Cisco Group Study; CCIE_Lab Group Study Subject: Another Frame-relay issue.. All,=20 I made another weird discovery this morning in one of my = practice labs. The lab equipment in use; AGS+ : 11.0(22) Frame-relay cloud R1 2501 : 12.0.9(15) Hub sub-interface(s0.1 P-t-P1.1.1.1), and = (s0.2, ip 2.2.2.1) Multipoint R2 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 1.1.1.2 R3 2502 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.2 R4 2520 : 11.3.(11a)T1 Spoke - Physical interface, ip 2.2.2.3 After setting the frame circuit and the Hub and spoke routers the HUB = specific local DLCI's come up and go active on the frame switch, the = spoke DLCI's go active the inactive, then deleted. I looked at every = thing that made sense,=20 1)Is the HUB - is the interface-dlci command using the correct dlci's , = Yes! =20 2) At the spokes is the encapsulation type(frame relay) configured, Yes! 3) Is the ip (L3) configured on all devices, Yes! Ok, a "clear frame inverse-arp" and a good sign I get an arp for R2 on = the hub! A second look shows R2 has no mappings and the pvc is = inactive. No matter what I did nothing. No this is really weird... Before I started this lab I did a "wr erase" = on all the routers. I proceeded to do a "wr mem" for the first time = since entering all my commands for my frame relay setup on the HUB, and = out of nowhere all the Spoke DLCI's go active and everything works like = it's suppose too. No, in everything things I've read it says that the commands go active = as they're entered, however here it seemed to require me to wr mem for = the circuit to come up. Has anyone seen this or have it happen in the = past. Thanks Nigel. ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How would you Explain it.
check out terabeamtheir great. mike On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Moe Tavakoli wrote: Another to look into is Telseon (we just used them and they are great.) I would approach him him possible solution: T1 T3 OC-3 And solutions from the fiber types (as stated before) Then let him decide what he can afford. Make sure to put ht eassociated hardware costs on paper for him too. For the T3 you'll need something that can support a HSSI or DS-3 port (I think the 3600 series supports the HSSI and OC-3, then 7500 is the first place I can remember for the DS-3 w/DSU integrated, others you'll need an external CSU/DSU) --- Ben Hockenhull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Keith Townsend wrote: I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. Actually, there are several companies that claim to offer connectivity from 1Mbps up to 1Gbps delivered via ethernet. Cogent Communications is one such company, at http://www.cogentco.com/. I don't know if they're actually selling service and I have my doubts about their claims. Another company is Yipes, at http://www.yipes.com/, offering scalable bandwidth from 1Mbps to 1Gbps. They seem to have a decent business plan and a reasonable infrastructure, but again, I can't speak for their actual service. This doesn't address any other misconceptions that your client may have regarding WAN bandwidth, but there you go. Ben _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = _ Moe Tavakoli __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: embarrasing question...
"Buri, Heather H" wrote: Are you talking about "term mon"? That displays events from debug on your terminal session. I think in full its "terminal monitor" - youd probably need to have it in full for the exams. TTFN Lauren _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco AVVID Call Manager 3.0 CIM
Jim K wrote: Does anyone have any feedback on this Cisco CIM. I would like to purchase this one . Is it a good publication ? Is there a callmanager cim out? Its not on the ciscopress web site. Id love to get hold of it if it is. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN with 1 Spid
I have included a config I am deploying on a hub-and-spoke deployment via frame-relay. I am having problems getting the ISDN interface to come up with only one spid. I do not have a strong background in ISDN and would appreciate assistance to tell me where I am going wrong in my config. Thank you in advance for your help. Regards, John Huston [EMAIL PROTECTED] begin config=== service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime service password-encryption ! hostname me ! enable password you ! logging buffered 4096 debugging ! username test password 0 test username me password 0 you ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip dhcp excluded-address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x ! ip dhcp pool primary network x.x.x.x x.x.x.x netbios-name-server x.x.x.x default-router x.x.x.x lease 5 ! isdn switch-type basic-ni ! ! ! interface Serial0 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0 encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue service-module t1 timeslots 23-24 frame-relay map ip x.x.x.x xxx broadcast no shut ! interface BRI0 description Backup ISDN interface ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 30 dialer string xxx dialer load-threshold 25 outbound dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 xxx no cdp enable ppp authentication pap callin ppp pap sent-username me password you no shut ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address x.x.x.x x.x.x.x no ip route-cache speed auto no fair-queue no shut ! router eigrp 20 network x.x.x.x ! ip classless no ip http server ! ! map-class dialer 64k access-list 101 deny eigrp any any access-list 101 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 101 ! line con 0 exec-timeout 0 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password xxx login ! no scheduler allocate end _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hexadecimal numbers
Does anyone know a good Web site to learn about the Structure of Hex Numbers and how to convert, from Hex to Binary, to Dec and back and forth between the systems and IPX Addresses also. TIA, Jess _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How would you Explain it.
Thanks for all the info. I'll look into Yipes sounds interesting. I didn't think any of these companies were actually offering services now. Have any of you actually used Yipes. What type of CPE had you have to invest in. Also, is it any good if the service provider go down under. I guess it would be a chance for me to learn alot about tunneling other protocols over IP because these guys are bridging a bunch of stuff now. Thanks, Keith Townsend MCSE, CNE, CCNA Townsend Consulting www.townsendconsulting.com ""Plantier, William (Spencer)"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Depending on what area you are at Adelphia will sell them a 10mg connection. -Original Message- From: Ben Hockenhull [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:20 PM To: Keith Townsend Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How would you Explain it. On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Keith Townsend wrote: I have a customer who wants to upgrade his 128K ISDN point to point connections to at lease a 10mbps connection. He is thinking along the lines of LAN technologies. He idea connection is a 1gb connection. How would go about explaining to this guy that he is out of his mind without damaging his ego. His the IT manager and thinks he's knowledgeable about networks. Actually, there are several companies that claim to offer connectivity from 1Mbps up to 1Gbps delivered via ethernet. Cogent Communications is one such company, at http://www.cogentco.com/. I don't know if they're actually selling service and I have my doubts about their claims. Another company is Yipes, at http://www.yipes.com/, offering scalable bandwidth from 1Mbps to 1Gbps. They seem to have a decent business plan and a reasonable infrastructure, but again, I can't speak for their actual service. This doesn't address any other misconceptions that your client may have regarding WAN bandwidth, but there you go. Ben _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Secondary IP addressing
How are they connected ? ""Roberts, Timothy"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am setting up secondary IPs on two of my serial interfaces. I can ping both IPs on ROUTER B from the other ROUTER A. The problem is that I cannot ping the secondary IP on ROUTER A from ROUTER B. What would cause this? Router A int serial 0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip address 128.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary Router B int serial 0 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip address 128.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipsec and cisco
Enhanced IP Services for Cisco Networks by Cisco Press. http://www.ciscopress.com/book.cfm?series=1book=114 "cdmb" wrote in message ... Does anyone know of any books that goes over implementing ipsec on cisco = equipment ?? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Swap Question
I see a lot of requests for lab swaps. What's Cisco's policy on this? How do they verify with both individuals that the swap is valid? Lastly, anyone want to trade Sept. 30 RTP for an earlier date? Nah...didn't think so. ;-) Thanks, Craig _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dumb Linux terminal-router question
Next week I'm teaching basic router configuration to some high school students. One of the students has a notebook computer that runs Linux. Assuming there is a normal serial port on the notebook, will he able to easily run a terminal emulator to connect to the console port on the Cisco routers? I know he'll be able to do Telnet once we have an initial config, but before we get to that point, can he config the routers in a similar fashion to the HyperTerminal the Windoze users will be using? Thank-you very much for your help. Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP OID's -- Sifting through too much infomration
I am trying to figure out which OID's I need to mointor in order to = gather the following information from Routers and Switches (CatOS and = IOS based) Interface Name Interface 5 Min Avg Error Rates Cpu Load Voltage Memory Utilization Uptime Buffer utilization And anything else that would you would consider important to monitor = (most of these I am planning to graph with a RRDtool or MRTG. I am = trying to get this information from Cisco's web site but i am finding = that there are alot of OID's to sift through and I am unsure of the = excact names of what I am looking for. Thanks in Advance -- Kevin _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secondary IP addressing
Via a back to back cable. -Original Message- From: Santosh Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Secondary IP addressing How are they connected ? ""Roberts, Timothy"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I am setting up secondary IPs on two of my serial interfaces. I can ping both IPs on ROUTER B from the other ROUTER A. The problem is that I cannot ping the secondary IP on ROUTER A from ROUTER B. What would cause this? Router A int serial 0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip address 128.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 secondary Router B int serial 0 ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip address 128.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 secondary _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dumb Linux terminal-router question
Yes he will. Most distributions of Linux come with a program called Minitab. It is similar to HyperTerminal. -Original Message- From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 3:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dumb Linux terminal-router question Next week I'm teaching basic router configuration to some high school students. One of the students has a notebook computer that runs Linux. Assuming there is a normal serial port on the notebook, will he able to easily run a terminal emulator to connect to the console port on the Cisco routers? I know he'll be able to do Telnet once we have an initial config, but before we get to that point, can he config the routers in a similar fashion to the HyperTerminal the Windoze users will be using? Thank-you very much for your help. Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dumb Linux terminal-router question
I'd reccomend the free upgrade to the native hyperterminal client it addresses known bugs with the nt version (based on past experience, i now assume that problems plaguing NT also plague Windows 2000 unless otherwise notified) and i've found it to be generally more robust (please note that that is an extremely informal observation). http://www.hilgraeve.com/ Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com on 03/03/2001 10:47:37 AM Please respond to Priscilla Oppenheimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Kevin Cullimore) Subject: dumb Linux terminal-router question Next week I'm teaching basic router configuration to some high school students. One of the students has a notebook computer that runs Linux. Assuming there is a normal serial port on the notebook, will he able to easily run a terminal emulator to connect to the console port on the Cisco routers? I know he'll be able to do Telnet once we have an initial config, but before we get to that point, can he config the routers in a similar fashion to the HyperTerminal the Windoze users will be using? Thank-you very much for your help. Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-+ | This message may contain confidential and/or privileged | | information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to | | receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, | | disclose or take any action based on this message or any| | information herein. If you have received this message in | | error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail | | and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. | +-+ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HEX
I never even knew the Windows Accessories calculator converted to hex! I just do it manually. I have the following numbers and letters pretty much memorized, so that helps. 10 = A 11 = B 12 = C 13 = D 14 = E 15 = F 16^0 = 1 16^1 = 16 16^2 = 256 16^3 = 4096 16^4 = 65536 Figure out where the number they give you falls in the above list, for example, is it between 256 and 4096? Or between 4096 and 65536? Divide by the smaller of the numbers you select. Keep dividing the remainders until you run out of numbers, (or can select the right answer, it is multiple choice after all!) Here's an example: Convert to Hex. Easy! Divide by 4096 = 1, remainder = 1459 Divide 1459 by 256 = 5, remainder = 179 Divide 179 by 16= B, remainder = 3 Divide 3 by 1 = 3 Answer = 15B3 Note: a few things made this example easy. divided by 4096 is obviously 1. 256 x 5 is obviously 1280. 16 x 11 is obviously 176. Often it's much easier than it seems. (Sometimes, it's not and you just do brute force.) Priscilla At 09:26 AM 3/2/01, Dale Frohman wrote: exactly. I had a friend who told me there was some HEX conversions on the BCMSN exam which i am scheduled to take in a couple of weeks. On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Barronton, Ken wrote: Because you can't use it during an exam. Real life...OK, exam...NO. -Original Message- From: Nuria Canamares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:27 AM To: 'Dale Frohman' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HEX Why don't you use the calculator of windows accesories? -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Dale Frohman Enviado el: Jueves 1 de Marzo de 2001 3:24 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: HEX Does anyone have a way/tricks in remembering how to do HEX conversions? Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
permanent cam entry.
We have two Catalyst 4006 switches with the Layer 3 services card. Both switches are trunked over the two GigE ports on the supervisor. I have added a permanent cam entry on each switch for a multicast MAC address sending it to port(s) 2/47 and 1/1-2 (trunk ports) When I reboot switch number one it's almost like the CAM entry disapears, when you do a show config, it is still in the config, doing a show cam perm also shows the entry. When I do a clear cam perm and then re-add the two entries it woulds fine. The other switch does not have this problem. Any ideas? Thanks, Clayton _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
