640-504 [7:8122]
Hi! What is the passing score for 640-504 (switching exam) and how many questions are there totally. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8122&t=8122 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radware's linkproof and Fatpipe [7:8085]
it use SmartNAT -- ""Kenneth"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > never mind guys, i read the radware whitepaper ang answered my own question. > Thnx > > ""Kenneth"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has anyone deployed this? I'm going through their site and it doesn't > > explain how it works without using BGP. We have a data center hosting > around > > 20 web-based application and we have an entire class C address space. I > > don't see how the "backup" ISP will be able to advertise our network if > the > > primary ISP connection fails without using BGP as these products claim to > > do any ideas? > > > > Thanks, guys! > > > > Kenneth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8123&t=8085 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:8061]
Ravi, Please check the T1 controller first and make sure the line is up. You can find useful guide for T1 troubleshooting in http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/116/index.html.It has a very good flowchart for T1 troubleshooting. There some config you should notice:clocking,line-code,framing and also use cross cable. Hope this will be helpful! Cheers, Aviva Chan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8124&t=8061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAT / citrix connectivity [7:7709]
This may be more than the solution calls for, but have you considered using the web client? You haven't mentioned how much flexibility the clients have or require in configuring their own connections, but if this is not an issue using the web will allow you complete control of all server connection parameters. The client just needs to know a URL. Worst case scenario you have to do a little (very little) html programming, but if you get NFuse even that's eliminated. Jay Dunn IPI GrammTech, Ltd. 210.694.4313 http://www.ipi-gt.com Nunquam Facilis Est -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lopez, Robert Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NAT / citrix connectivity [7:7709] Shrug, You indicated that even if we use NAT, client-side changes will still have to be made. I found one document on the citrix site that speaks of "ICA Browsing with firewall address translation - NAT". This document provides a straight-forward solution but requires making a change on both the client and server side. Is there any other documentation that states the need to configure the client as well. My dilemma is that I've been asked to provide a solution that will allow the citrix client to create a session to the citrix server in the new subnet - and doing so without touching the client-side. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Robert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NAT / citrix connectivity [7:7709] On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Lopez, Robert wrote: > establish a session. This is where my problem lies...the citrix server ip > address will change once it's in the new subnet...the client will not be > able to connect. > > It was suggested that we implement NAT to allow the client to connect to the > citrix server. This is a quick snapshot of what we have... I'm assuming that notifying the users and having them change the IP is not a feasable option? Even if you DID use NAT to translate the old IP to the new IP, client-side changes will have to be made. (and i think the server will bave to be set up appropriately too..I'm only familar with the client side.) The client end will have to, going from a bad memory, change their firewall settings to allow them to connect to the server-behind-nat. There is an option along the lines of "use alternate IP address" or something...its been about 4 months since I did this and havent been in front of a citrix client in at least 2...its a well documented bit. The /better/ solution of course would be to assign a FQDN to the IP addresses and have the clients change to THAT, so that it is only done once...and then you can change the IP at will. ~shrug~ ...david > NAT config on cat6509sw1r1 > ip nat inside source static 10.101.99.20 164.42.100.25 If I read this right, it appears that you are doing the translation at the /client/ end, not the server end...that is totally wierd, to me. But, in that case, should that not be ip nat OUTSIDE source static since that is the direction we need to go? but I'm still rather confused why you are doing the NAT at the client side instead of the server side.. david --- david raistrick (deep in the south georgia woods) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8125&t=7709 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help on VLAN configuration [7:8127]
Hi All, The scenario is such that I have 2 subnets configured on the LAN. They are x.x.1.0 / 24 and x.x.2.0 / 24. The IP address for the Routers ethernet port are x.x.1.1 and x.x.2.1. Similarly workstations in either subnet point to these addresses ( x.x.1.1 and x.x.2.1 ) as their default gateways. I am having Cat 5509 and Cat 6609 ( With MSFC) with all the ports in the default VLAN1 I have the following queries on this : Config on MSFC Can the IP addresses of the vlan interfaces be any one of the free IP address available on the LAN. For eg x.x.1.3 What will be the default gateway address configured on MSFC in this case ? ( Will it point towards the address of the Ethernet interface of the External router ) On the Switches Can both switches be configured in the VTP Server mode ? Do the trunk ports have to have an IP address ? DHCP Server How would I have to define the scopes on the DHCP server. Suppose I plan to have 1 Vlan configured for 1 subnet and 4 VLANs in the second subnet. How to go about it. Thanks in advance for any kind of help/ suggestions __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8127&t=8127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cisco secure scanner ping sweep error [7:8126]
Hi All, Using 2500 host licensed CiscoSecure Scanner 2.0.1.2 on a MS-Windows 2000 SP2 on a new Dell laptop. Running a scan for +- 1500 host on the local network with most of the settings to default, when starting the scan the ping phase starts immediately at +- 53 and after a few seconds jumps to +- 65 ext. This looks fine BUT, after another few seconds, the ping sweep just runs through up to the last host. The ping phase doesn't even last a minute, and doesn't discover all the host on the network. When using one class C network at a time, it finds more hosts on the network but the ping sweep does the same. I have look on CCO for some answers but with no luck. (I'm not using a ISDN connection) Any Ideas please CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance. Regards, Jacques Allison CCDP, CCNP + Security Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8126&t=8126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
hi all, I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in a vlan. I'm currently redesigning a network that would have a vlan containing about 300 devices. Is the 254 restriction a design one? Please can someone enlighting me on this issue. regards, Tunde _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8128&t=8128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF over NBMA [7:7941]
guys, i use a multipoint connections ...these are no different from ordinary connections ...they can just accept multiple network`s we have mulitple ospf area`s ...also have multiple class A`s all terminating at these multipoint int`s also when i said cost i meant the cost of having 10 point to point leased lines connecting to 10 router int`s (central office) and one each at the remote ( yeah i know you would never do it but using sub-ints saves you a lot of money. i would need a 3660 int the central office without sub-ints and a 3620 with ) but agian you are right about the frame stuff cheers for the info steve >From: "John Neiberger" >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OSPF over NBMA [7:7941] >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:16:39 -0400 > >With frame relay, this is not exactly the case. Suppose we had 10 >remote sites with one PVC to each. All ten PVCs could point back to a >single interface on a hub router. If they all point to the same local >DLCI, then the configuration is point-to-multipoint. If they point to >different DLCIs, then the configuration is point-to-point and >subinterfaces can be used. > >As far as I know there is no cost difference between these two >configurations, but since I've never ordered any multipoint connections >I really don't know for certain. > >John > > >>> "Stephen Skinner" 6/11/01 10:37:13 AM > >>> >one other thing no-one has seemed to say is cost > >point to point requires a point to point link (i.e 2 interfaces) >Full Mesh > >point to multipoint requires 1 and X (x bieng how many remote sites you > >have). >Star topology > >E.G > >we have 40 remotes sites . running anything form 128k to 4 meg and we >have 2 >multipoint 10 meg int`s at the central side > >saves time money and configs > >steve > > > >From: "John Neiberger" > >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: OSPF over NBMA [7:7941] > >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:11:54 -0400 > > > >One reason that comes to mind might be if you had a limited number of > >addresses and conservation was necessary. Using multipoint PVCs all > >endpoints would be in the same subnet. If you wanted to use PVCs, >each PVC > >would be in a separate subnet. The effect of this could be >alleviated > >somewhat by intelligent use of VLSM but I suppose it could still be a > >problem for some. > > > >I could see this situation happening if you were using registered > >addresses. > >Now that NAT is so prevalent this wouldn't be an issue in a new >network > >design. > > > >At least I don't think it would be. > > > >Another very good reason to learn about this topic is that Cisco seems >to > >like to test people on it. :-) > > > >Regards, > >John (who is off to the coffee maker now) > > > >Avs Rule!! (Hey, is the sky turning maroon or is that just me??) > > > >| Whenever reading about OSPF there seems to be a great deal of >emphasis > >on > >| NBMA in a multipoint enviroment. > >| Why would you want to implement mulipoint when you could uses point >to > >point > >| between remote offices connecting back to area0 ?? > >| > >| Chris Burnham, > >| Systems Engineer, > >| Delphis Consulting Plc. > >| Tel: +(44) 020 7916 0200 > >| Mob: +(44) 07799403576 > >| [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >| > >| > >| This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely >for > >the > >| addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally >privileged. > >| Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC ["Delphis"] >and > >they > >| must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the >addressee. > >If > >| you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, >you > >may > >| not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them >from > >| your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure. >Delphis > >does > >| not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after >they > >have > >| been sent. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal >to the > >| author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis. > >| > >| > >| > >| > >___ > >Send a cool gift with your E-Card > >http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8129&t=7941 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bri into ei PRI interface [7:8130]
Hi all, We have a 3640 with E1 interface. I have been asked to find out if we can use this interface with BRI instead of PRI, to save costs, as it is only a backup link for 20 people. Any hints/suggestions welcome. Cheers, Symon __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8130&t=8130 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX static address translation question [7:8031]
... I am running 5.3(1) on a PIX520UR and use nothing but conduits ... and all of my conduits still function ... Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: Chris Agnoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: PIX static address translation question [7:8031] If you are using IOS 5.23 or higher on the Pix, you can't use conduits anymore. Access-Lists are the only supported way to permit inbound traffic. (Really sucks when you upgrade a Pix running 5.12, with several hundred conduits!!) The Conduit Permit ICMP any any command still works, but that's it. To further confuse things, the firewall lets you add the conduit statement, but ignores it. >>> "Allen May" 06/11/01 03:50PM >>> If ICMP is disabled you won't be able to ping it. Conduit statements must open the correct protocol & ports to connect as well. The router could possibly be blocking ICMP or ports also. Can the inside machine ping the inside interface of the PIX? - Original Message - From: "Gary Crouch" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:06 PM Subject: PIX static address translation question [7:8031] > we have servers hosted at a ISP and have a back port connection > and would like to give a client access thur our back port using one of our > external IP address I have configure a static address translation for the > external ip address > and added a route for the internal address I can pig the internal address > from the PIX > but can not ping the server with the external address from outside. > does the static and conduit commands work when there is a router between the > server? > is there a way to make this work? > > Thanks for your help * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8131&t=8031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN Simulator [7:8132]
Hello Group ! Which ISDN simulator is an affordable and cheap for preparation of CCIE Lab. Thanks TARIQ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8132&t=8132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Route Updates and Fast Switching Cache [7:8110]
John, my understanding is that the router will continue to use the previously cached route until such time as the cache for that route is aged as invalid. 1/20th of the cache is aged randomly every one minute, unless there is less than 200K of available memory, in which case 1/5th of the cache is aged every minute. After it has aged the router will then process switch a packet to that destination since it has no cache entry, see that there are now 2 routes to the destination and re-build the cache with both paths, performing per-destination balancing as that is the only available balancing method with fast switching. I have found that in a lab environment the aging will happen very quickly because you have very few entries, and you will probably find that it is a minute or less before both routes are being used. You can see this if you want by configuring 2 routers with 2 different equal cost paths to each other, but only having one in the routing table, ie shut down one interface. Turn on ICMP debugging and ping the other router, then bring the other interface up and do another ping. You will probably find that the router will send all 5 pings out one interface, and then the next 5 pings will be sent out the other interface. You can also look at this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/20.html#3 to find some really interesting info on the different switching methods. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Route Updates and Fast Switching Cache [7:8110] After reading a practice test question and answer I'm confused about the operation of fast switching, specifically when a route has already been cached when a new equal-cost route is learned via a different interface. For example: Route A learns of 192.168.1.0/24 via e0 with a metric of 1000. Fast switching is enabled so this route is cached. Then the router learns of 192.168.1.0/24 with a metric of 1000 via e1. My thinking is that the cache would be invalidated and recreated with two entries but the test engine answer stated that routing would not change because the route was cached and the cache would not be invalidated. Any thoughts? I'd test this myself but at the moment I only have two routers at home. Do any of you have any experience with this? Thanks, John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8133&t=8110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 640-504 Test strategy [7:8134]
Hello, Does it really matter? All the CCNP level tests have 60 something questions, and the passing score is in the high 600's or low 700's, and the time is around 90 minutes. Don't let that be a hang-up! Study hard until you know the material, then take the test. At that point the number of questions, passing score, and time doesn't matter. When you're sitting in front of the computer about to take the test and the numbers for the test are revealed does it bother you? If it does you're probably not ready for the test. My strategy is when I see the numbers for the test, I write them down on the scratch pad. I then divide the total time for the test in 4 times and calculate what question number I must be on at that time to be on schedule to finish on time. Example: 64 ques, 90 min At about 22 min in to the test I should be on at least ques # 16 At about 44 min in to the test I should be on at least ques # 32 At about 66 min in to the test I should be on at least ques # 48 At about 88 min in to the test I should be on at least ques # 64 - DONE! Hope this helps, Ken - CCDP, CCNP -Original Message- From: Md Fahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 640-504 [7:8122] Hi! What is the passing score for 640-504 (switching exam) and how many questions are there totally. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8134&t=8134 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IIS5 migration [7:8136]
Hi, everybody: We have a Windows 2000 server IIS5 running, and so many web sites on it. Now we want to implement load balancing and fault tolerance functions, so that we have to build Windows 2000 Advanced Server machines, because you can not upgrade Windows 2000 Server to Windows 2000 Advanced Server.However some web sites are very difficult to set them up, and we did a long time ago supported by developers. So I don't want to manually build each site, is there any way for us to migrate Windows 2000 Server IIS5 configurations to Windows 2000 Advanced Server IIS5? Please help. Thanks. Shawn Xu CCNP,MCSE _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8136&t=8136 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bri into ei PRI interface [7:8130]
No, unfortunatelly not. If you are in Europe, maybe you can run a leased line over 64 or 128k but this would involve your telco also and a mad configuration on the E1 controller. Other thing that you might do is to see if there are any migration promotions by Cisco where you could get a bri module, which is, I think , cheaper. Also, you might just by an 800 for $800 and run hsrp between that router and your 3640 (with 12.1xg version on the 800) and enjoy it. Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8135&t=8130 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which is the Best Book on the CID test [7:8117]
I always go with actual Cisco books for all the exams. People use bunch of other crap instead of going with Cisco books, for some reason. In some cases, you have question on those exams that come exactly from the book (even the sentence is the same). What else could you wish?! Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8137&t=8117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WIC_2T cable [7:8108]
right! Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8138&t=8108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco IOS IP/FW [7:8119]
Why don't you use Cisco ConfigMaker 2.5? It is a great tool, and can configure almost everything. Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8140&t=8119 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Simulator [7:8132]
I recommend the Teltone demonstrator for the a lab setup. Thats the one I use. I got it for 1685.00 Raul - Original Message - From: "Tariq Azad" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:17 AM Subject: ISDN Simulator [7:8132] > Hello Group ! > > Which ISDN simulator is an affordable and cheap for preparation of CCIE Lab. > > Thanks > > TARIQ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8141&t=8132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN subaddresses [7:8109]
I am not sure, but I think this :4356 portion of the number is only there if your router is behind a PABX, which then assigns the subaddresses to different ports.A telco doesn't even see that number. Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8142&t=8109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route Updates and Fast Switching Cache [7:8110]
>After reading a practice test question and answer I'm confused about the >operation of fast switching, specifically when a route has already been >cached when a new equal-cost route is learned via a different interface. >For example: > >Route A learns of 192.168.1.0/24 via e0 with a metric of 1000. Fast >switching is enabled so this route is cached. Then the router learns of >192.168.1.0/24 with a metric of 1000 via e1. My thinking is that the cache >would be invalidated and recreated with two entries but the test engine >answer stated that routing would not change because the route was cached and >the cache would not be invalidated. > >Any thoughts? I'd test this myself but at the moment I only have two >routers at home. Do any of you have any experience with this? > >Thanks, >John > If I understand the question, the answer is correct. Where you are getting confused is the difference in load balancing between process switching and fast switching. Essentially, your thinking is correct if the interface were in process switching mode, which does per-packet load balancing. I'll make the minor nit that process switching has no cache, but looks things up directly in the RIB (i.e., main routing table). Formally, per-packet is deterministic rather than statistical load balancing. Fast switching uses per-destination load balancing. It will only have one cached entry to any destination; the load balancing comes as a result of having many cached entries to many destinations. Per-destination load balancing is statistical, not deterministic, and indeed can get unbalanced with a small number of destination. CEF uses source-destination pair load balancing, which is still statistical but increases the number of choices and reduces the probability that the load will be unbalanced onto one interface in a group. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8143&t=8110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP Port don't shown in PIX syslog [7:8144]
Hi, there is a valid reason that in Message 106019 Source and Destination Ports doesn't appear in PIX Syslog? There is another way to log src_port and dest_port for these refused connections? Many thanks Luca Here the Documentation: %PIX-4-106019: IP packet from src_addr to dest_addr, protocol protocol received from interface int_name deny by access-group acl_ID Explanation This message is logged when an IP packet is denied by the parameters you specified in the access list with the ID acl_ID. Action None required. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8144&t=8144 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain? -Original Message- From: John Kale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] hi all, I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in a vlan. I'm currently redesigning a network that would have a vlan containing about 300 devices. Is the 254 restriction a design one? Please can someone enlighting me on this issue. regards, Tunde _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8145&t=8128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
I'm gonna take a wild stab at this but I believe 500 ethernet devices is Cisco reccomended amount per VLan. Take that number and confirm it please. Bryan - Original Message - From: "John Kale" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:45 AM Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] > hi all, > > I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in a vlan. > I'm currently redesigning a network that would have a vlan containing about > 300 devices. Is the 254 restriction a design one? Please can someone > enlighting me on this issue. > > > regards, > > > Tunde > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8146&t=8128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which is the Best Book on the CID test [7:8117]
I don't think that anyone dislikes the Cisco CID book. I think that some folks wish it was a bit more focused on the exam itself. Try the Sybex ( I haven't read it but it comes highly recommended here) if you want a book focused on the test. Personally I read the Cisco book and with my prior knowledge/reading it was more than enough to pass the CID exam. I did read the Sybex exam notes and found it vague at best. Good Luck! Bryan CCNP CCDP CNE MCSE - Original Message - From: "Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA." To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:54 AM Subject: Which is the Best Book on the CID test [7:8117] > I will be writing my CIT today, I wrote Switching 2.0 last week Monday and > will wrap up my quest for CCNP next week by writing Remote Access 2.0 . I > would have taken the CID next week instead of Remote Access, but for want of > the real book to go for. My target is to become a CCNP and a CCDP by the last > week of this month, nothing more nothing less. > > Please can any one help me with the correct book to use? I have been using > Cisco press all these while, but recently popular options in the group did > not > favour the Cisco press for its lack of focus on the exam proper. > > Please which of the book will be more focused. > > Regards. > Oletu H. Godswill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8147&t=8117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed BSCN but..............? [7:7719]
I am planning to take this exam next week, what Boson exam do you recommend, and what advise can you give re: "must know's".. >From: "cheekin" >Reply-To: "cheekin" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Passed BSCN but..? [7:7719] >Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:20:41 -0400 > >I must have been the unlucky one over here. Got a lot of scenario >questions >that tested me on the understanding of the routing protocols and questions >on redistribution. > >Regards, >cheekin > >- Original Message - >From: "Remmert Veen" >To: >Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 18:28 >Subject: RE: Passed BSCN but..? [7:7719] > > > > Hmmmjust passed the BSCN as well, amazingly with a 919, just like >you! > > > > My findings are completely the same, the exam was way too easy. While I >was > > preparing for tough, in-depth questions and a lot of CLI commands, the >exam > > stuck at the level of 'What do the letters BGP stand for?'. > > > > A shame, let's hope the switching-exam will be of a bit better quality. > > > > Regards, > > Remmert _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8148&t=7719 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IP address [7:8106] Subnet calculator [7:8149]
Try this when you are online and use the atachment if it gets through. http://www.agt.net/public/sparkman/netcalc.htm Otherwise if the attachment does not get through go to dogpile.com and search for "subnet calculator" Bryan - Original Message - From: "parky chan" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:41 AM Subject: IP address [7:8106] > what is the fast and easy method to count I.P and subnet mask > can you help me ? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-zip-compressed which had a name of ipsbnet.zip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8149&t=8149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IPSEC (ESP) over NAT ? [7:8150]
Hello, Does anyone know if Cisco IOS (any version) supports IPSEC passthrough over NAT ? I need to make the following configuration running: [Server]---[VPN gateway]--internet-[Cisco1600,NAT][Client] - Client (a PC with IPSEC VPN client) should have access to Server over IPSEC VPN - Cisco 1600 makes NAT with overload - IPSEC protocol is IPSEC ESP (not AH) I have two options: -to do something with Cisco to let it pass IPSEC traffic; -to switch VPN in UDP-encapsulated mode (IPSEC-over-UDP), which works over the most dumb NAT (we have to pay for upgrade, however). So my question is, does Cisco suppport IPSEC passthrough ? Alexander Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8150&t=8150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IP address [7:8106] Subnet calculator [7:8106]
There's a pretty good free one at www.solarwinds.net then click the Free Tools link. Kris. -Original Message- From: Bryan In Richmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IP address [7:8106] Subnet calculator [7:8149] Try this when you are online and use the atachment if it gets through. http://www.agt.net/public/sparkman/netcalc.htm Otherwise if the attachment does not get through go to dogpile.com and search for "subnet calculator" Bryan - Original Message - From: "parky chan" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:41 AM Subject: IP address [7:8106] > what is the fast and easy method to count I.P and subnet mask > can you help me ? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-zip-compressed which had a name of ipsbnet.zip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8151&t=8106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIP capacity [7:8152]
Hello all, I am having a router 7513 with vip2-40, and T3 , mc-E3, and 8T port adapters I was wondering if it is better to put the T3, and the E3 on the same VIP, or i would better put one high capacity port adapter with a low capacity one (i.e. the 8T)?? Thanks. Regards, - Hossam El-Ashkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8152&t=8152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route Updates and Fast Switching Cache [7:8110]
John Neiberger wrote: > > After reading a practice test question and answer I'm confused about the > operation of fast switching, specifically when a route has already been > cached when a new equal-cost route is learned via a different interface. > For example: > > Route A learns of 192.168.1.0/24 via e0 with a metric of 1000. Fast > switching is enabled so this route is cached. Then the router learns of > 192.168.1.0/24 with a metric of 1000 via e1. My thinking is that the cache > would be invalidated and recreated with two entries but the test engine > answer stated that routing would not change because the route was cached and > the cache would not be invalidated. > With the exception of CEF, all Cisco switching modes are demand-based. Only after a packet is successfully forwarded to a destination (via process-switching), will IOS add a route cache entry for _that destination_. So it's not as if the existing of a route/prefix causes a cache entry to be created; rather it's traffic generated. In your example above, all traffic to 192.168.1.22 would go via e0, as long as that remains valid. Traffic for a second host in 192.168.1.0/24 will go via e1. And so on. CEF does add entries to the FIB and AdjTable that directly correspond to routing table and ARP cache entries. It's not demand-based. > Any thoughts? I'd test this myself but at the moment I only have two > routers at home. Do any of you have any experience with this? Actually you can test this with just two routers if you can create two equal-cost paths with them. But you must create the traffic with a third device -- a host connected to a LAN interface. Switching modes only apply to packets that are in fact switched; i.e., forwarded. Traffic that originates within the router or terminates in the router is not fast-switched, nor process-switched -- it's not switched at all! If a ping is sourced from the router with two equal paths, the pings will alternate paths on a per-packet basis. Marty Adkins Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mentor Technologies Phone: 240-568-6526 133 National Business Pkwy WWW: http://www.mentortech.com Annapolis Junction, MD 20701Cisco CCIE #1289 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8153&t=8110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6509 Configuration [7:8154]
Hi All, I am trying to configure a 6509 switch with multiple VLANS. I have the configuration guide printed out and believe that I have most of the configuration correct but I can't get it to communicate with anything. My question first is; do I have to configure anything in the router portion of the unit. When ever I try to enter commands in the router portion, they do not show up in the router configuration. I have been trying to configure it similar to my 5505 switch, but this does not seem to be working. What do I need to do to configure the router section. Also, is there anything that needs to be done to link the router to the switch or are they automatically linked. I need to have this configured and tested by this friday, so any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8154&t=8154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT nitpicking: To: vs. cc: (was Re: Rule 5-4-3 [7:7578]) [7:8155]
Ok, this is how it works. A message arrives to the server. 1. The message is sent immediately to a procmail script that checks to see if the to: or cc: address contain [EMAIL PROTECTED] This blocks any messages that may have been bcc:'ed to the list. By doing this, we prevent about 10 spam messages a day from being sending on the list. 2. Next the message is run through a script that checks the senders address. What we are checking here is if this particular sender sent over 15 messages/day to the list. The assumption is over 15 messages/day, there might be a mail-loop and we should kill the messages. The script then checks the total number of messages on the list. I believe I have this list set to 250 messages a day. Over 250 messages/day will cause the "circuit breakers" to fire preventing any additional messages on the list. Again this is to prevent mail-loops or mail-bombs from filling our e-mail accounts. It has fired a few times. Last time, some server in Texas was sending messages back to the list that were over 6 months old. So once the list hit 250, the list will shutdown. 3. Next the message is sent through a program that converts any HTML e-mail to plain-text. You should always be sending plain-text through the list, but sometimes people forget. An HTML message usually takes twice the bandwidth as a plain-text message. Since the server currently uses 6-8 GB/day we want to limit messages to plain-text only. If you send a link using HTML, the link may become corrupt as it passes through the filter. By sending plain-text, you can be assured you message will go through unchanged. 4. Next the message is sent to a program that posts the message on the web-board. I would encourage people to read the web-board instead of subscribing to the mailing list, as it uses less bandwidth since you are not receiving every message. Before it gets posted on the web-board, a series of checks are made. First, any message larger then 40k characters is rejected. This is usually not a problem as the message has already been converted to plain-text. Then a series of keywords are checked (see George Carlin). Besides profanity, known advertisers are also checked. So for example, if you have a great new product, it may seem spamming the list with advertisements is a great form of free advertising. But this will place your product on the profanity list, preventing even legitimate discussion of the product. So in the long run, it hurts sales and discourages spamming of the list. 5. If the message makes it through the web posting, it is re-written as an e-mail and sent to the mailing list (customized version of majordomo). It use to take 7 hours for the message to be fully delivered. Now the mailing-list is sorted by domain and broken into groupings of 50 domains each. Each grouping runs in parallel delivering the message in about an hour. So depending upon where you fall in the list, delivery might be faster or slower, but you should receive the message in about an hour. 6. At the same time a copy of the messages is converted to news format for posting on the newsfeed. The message usually is posted on the newsfeed at about the time the first e-mail is being sent. So reading the newsfeed is a more timely option then reading the list. 7. While the message is being sent through the mailing list, and newsfeed, a copy is saved in the archives queue. Once a week, a program runs that posts the messages to the archives. Most of the software is customized/home grown for this website, written in Perl, PHP, a little C with the database backend being MySQL. Remember I am not a programmer and this was all self-taught. My guess a "real" programmer would cringe at some of my code, but hey it works. The entire thing is being run on a customized version of RedHat Linux. What was the question again? Oh' yea. The message in step 5 is re-written as a to:. That is why every message from the list begins with to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages that are cc:'ed to the list end up being converted. I can not imagine this being a problem. Is it? Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8155&t=8155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
swL3 [7:8156]
Hi there, can someone give me some good sites with informations - Tips reguarding L3-Switching? I am in big need of em. thankyou to every response. Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8156&t=8156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VIP capacity [7:8152]
Hi! I don't think that the vip can handle two high-speed interfaces. You will have to go with one low- and one high-speed. Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8157&t=8152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP on 1005 & 1720 [7:7902]
Thank you gents for your help, I will get on it right away!! Rashid ""Laszlo Csosza"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi! > > not... > the IP PLUS would be: c1700-bnsy-mz > > -- > > cU, > > Laszlo Csosza > > > ""Rashid Lohiya"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have (C1700-Y-M) Version 12.1(3), c1700-y-mz.12-3 at the moment > > Any ideas whether this is IP plus or not? > > > > Rashid > > > > "Pawel Sikora" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Rashid Lohiya" > > > > > > > I have been labbing a scenario, most of today, but when I got to my > > little > > > > 1005 and 1720 routers, it stopped the show. > > > > I am unable to get bgp running on these units and I can't understand > > why. > > > > > > 1720 with IP Plus software will do. > > > > > > Pawel/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8158&t=7902 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6509 Configuration [7:8154]
Friend, What you are trying to do is not hard, but, you need to go through a few steps. I imagine you have an MSFC card inside... - Do a show modules and check if you can see it in slot 15 (and if it is in state "ok") - Try doing a session 15 (you should get to the router> prompt on the MSFC - Configure the normal stuff in the router (password, vty, hostname etc...) (just to check that the router is working fine) Go back to the switch and create the VLANS (maybe you already did this) Add VTP information (if you need it) Go back to the MSFC create the VLANS matching the ones you created in the switch... ( INT VLAN 3, ETC...) Do a NO SHUT in each one of them, __ you will be ready to assign ports to in the Switch to each vlan, communication will flow through the routing card.. You can later do more things on the config.. Like adding OSPF or whaterver you are trying to accomplish. Good Luck -Gonzalo. ""Michael Oaks"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > I am trying to configure a 6509 switch with multiple VLANS. I have the > configuration guide printed out and believe that I have most of the > configuration correct but I can't get it to communicate with anything. > My question first is; do I have to configure anything in the router > portion of the unit. When ever I try to enter commands in the router > portion, they do not show up in the router configuration. I have been > trying to configure it similar to my 5505 switch, but this does not seem > to be working. What do I need to do to configure the router section. > > Also, is there anything that needs to be done to link the router to the > switch or are they automatically linked. I need to have this configured > and tested by this friday, so any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8159&t=8154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radware's linkproof and Fatpipe [7:8085]
In that situation--where you need to be advertised from both providers--these devices won't cut the mustard, at least as far as I can tell. We have had reps from both companies here to explain to us the benefits of their products and they still really don't have a good way to do what you're trying to do. In our company we also host our own website and are multihomed. In this scenario we use BGP. Entirely separate from that network we have an ISP for outgoing internet access for our employees. We will be adding a second T-1 and then installing the Radware Linkproof hardware. In this case, we have no internal addresses that *have* to be advertised from both ISPs so this will work quite well for us. HTH, John >>> "Kenneth" 6/11/01 6:16:56 PM >>> Has anyone deployed this? I'm going through their site and it doesn't explain how it works without using BGP. We have a data center hosting around 20 web-based application and we have an entire class C address space. I don't see how the "backup" ISP will be able to advertise our network if the primary ISP connection fails without using BGP as these products claim to do any ideas? Thanks, guys! Kenneth Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8160&t=8085 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
To all, In Cisco's BCMSN class, they make the comment of "254". I think that Cisco chose this number is because that most people use a "/24" mask for subnetting. In BOTH of Cisco's design classes, this is the recommendation: * IP= 500 * IPX = 300 * AT = 200 * Mixed = 200 I think that the design classes make a more accurate guestimate, at least I've seen this true from my consulting experience. However, EVERY network is DIFFERENT--what works for one network won't work for another. I had one customer that had 1,800 devices in the SAME broadcast domain--everything was bridged, not routers. When I first heard this, I didn't believe it. Actually, their network "kind of" worked. For 30 seconds traffic would go through, and the next 30 seconds they'd have a broadcast storm. It was pretty funny. Of course, they realized one day that when they added another machine to the network, it broke the cycle, and then they decided to redesign their network with routers (which was why I was there). Enjoy! Richard Deal [EMAIL PROTECTED] * CCNA/CCNP test author for www.equizware.com--500 questions each for the CCNA Routing and Switching, CCNP Routing, CCNP Switching, CCNP Remote Access, and CCNP Support tests * Author of the following Coriolis books: CCNP Switching Exam Cram, CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep, and CCNP Cisco Lan Switch Configuration ___ ""John Kale"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi all, > > I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in a vlan. > I'm currently redesigning a network that would have a vlan containing about > 300 devices. Is the 254 restriction a design one? Please can someone > enlighting me on this issue. > > > regards, > > > Tunde Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8161&t=8128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Specialization Track [7:7962]
I used the following books to pass the CVOICE 2.0 exam.. Configuring Voice over IP, Syngress Media, ISBN 1928994032 $38.95 (good book...easy to read but detailed) Cisco Packetized Voice and Data Integration, McGraw Hill, $35.50 ISBN 0071347771 I've got a few McGraw Hill books. It covered the material as well as the Syngress one, but I preferred the Syngress. However, I think I read the McGraw Hill one first, so perhaps I liked the Syngress one better because I already had an understanding of the material Hope this helps! FYI: You can get both of those books at www.bookpool.com (that's where I got the above prices) Mike W. "Wayne Lawson" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Navin, > > Resources for this track are somewhat limited - I would recommend getting > to the > CIPT and CVOICE classes. > > > ""Navin Parwal"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi , > >Can anyone tell me what is the best way to prepare for the Voice > > Specialization track after CCNP , which are the best books to refer to for > > this track , our company wants to become a Vioce Specialist and is > pursuing > > me to specialize in this track , any ideas on the hardware needed and the > > books and materials to refer to . > > thanks > > > > -- > > Navin Parwal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8101&t=7962 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871]
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Kevin Wigle wrote: > I wasn't aware that an extended exam was anymore different than "normal" > exams except you get more time. > > If this truly is the only difference I'm not sure what your point is. If > you, a good English speaker can do the test in 1 hour, then - you're done. > Doesn't matter if the exam has allotted 2 hours or 3 hours, you're done in > 1. Picture the following aborted recruiter interview: Me: "I'm a CCNP and CCDP..." Recruiter: (interrupts me) "You passed the extended exams, not the standard ones. You're not a true CCNP and CCDP. You won't do. Good bye." (OK, this is slightly exaggerated, but it should give you the gist.) > I don't think too many people from the US/Canada are going to hop a plane to > get that extra 30 minutes test time. Perhaps someone in Brittain would take > the train to France? that would probably bump the effective price up a bit. Well, now that you mention it... A Briton would have to hop onto a train or plane to Brussels to take the CCIE lab. So would a German, a Greek, or a Spaniard. I don't remember anything in the CCIE lab blueprint that mentioned granting an extra 2 hours, or half-day, or whatever, to candidates who don't speak natively whatever language(s) the lab documents are written in and or the lab proctors speak or mangle. That sounds inconsistent with the stated goals, esp. when the CCIE written *has* the extension. > I agree with your point #1 and with that a candidate should be able to elect > to take a non-extended exam. However, a problem could present itself later > if a candidate failed the exam and then complained he didn't understand the > consequences of not taking an extended exam! :-) I don't think that Vue or > Prometric want to be responsible for having to first judge the English > proficiency of a candidate. Amusingly, at least one Prometric testing center in Paris also offers an ESL proficiency exam. But you're right, they shouldn't have to. However, there are ways around this, such as letting you (the candidate) take the exam again for free, perhaps limiting that to cases where you appear to be in good faith and or didn't fail the exam abismally (which could be decided by the number of correct answers to questions you had time to answer before the ax felt). Also, the policy is cisco's, and my email was addressed to cisco. > Your point #2 probably wasn't thought of in that way because that would be > politcally incorrect and nobody wants that :-) OK, so I'm blunt and unsubtle. :-) I'm curious, though: what would be a newspeak way of stating it without making it meaningless? > Your point #3 would require in my opinion that the option to accept/deny the > extended exam would have to be asked in the candidate's native language. > Now imagine how interesting that could get... I must have a pedestrian imagination, because all solutions to that that I could think of are uninteresting. - If registering online: IMHO, someone who could navigate the test center's web pages should be able to understand a warning, or a mention, in plain English right at the point the option is offered. - If registering in person or on the phone: you would presumably speak to someone (an administrative assistant or receptionist, perhaps) who speaks the same language as you. > Unless the exam content is easier somehow, I think you're over-reacting a > little bit. I would just accept the time and probably never use it (I > hope). And I may well end up doing that myself. Indeed, I did in the past. But who said I can't try to change that policy and or get a good rant out of it at the same time? 'Sides which, I have to live up to my reputation as a loudmouth and a curmudgeon, don't I? :-) > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: "ElephantChild" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 10:32 AM > Subject: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871] > > > This is a copy of a message I sent to cisco training about hidden > > dangers of extended exams. Thoughtful comments and answering rants are > > equally welcome. No flames, please. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: ElephantChild > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:51:08 +0200 (CEST) > > Subject: CSIDS 2.0 beta: can I have the unextended version? > > > > On June 1st, I registered to take 9E1-572, the CSIDS 2.0 beta. I'm > > scheduled to take it on June 14 at a VUE testing center in France. The > > confirmation message I received stated that the test time was extended > > by 30 minutes to accomodate me as a "non-native English speaker living > > in (a) non-English-speaking country", when I didn't request any such > > accomodation. That, IMO, carries 3 disturbing assumptions: > > > > 1- That no native English speaker would live outside an English-speaking > >country. > > > > 2- That ESL fluency is somehow inferior to native fluency, and not > >enough to
Re: DLSW+ [7:8116]
My first guess was that those broadcasts you're seeing are spanning tree explorers (or single route explorers) which I know that Netbios uses. However, since you're using DLSw+, any traffic coming in on the serial interface will be IP, meaning that the router wouldn't see the Netbios broadcast because it's encapsulated inside the IP packet. It could be that the broadcasts you're seeing are a result of your routing protocol. IIRC, both broadcasts and multicasts show up in the broadcast counters, and routing protocols will use one or the other. Then again, I may be wrong. I've never use DLSw+ to transport Netbios so I really don't know what to expect in the way of traffic behavior. Regards, John >>> "Charles Peter" 6/12/01 12:38:26 AM >>> I am using DLSW to transport SNA traffic over Frame relay network. There are AS/400 on the hub sites and Lotus notes (using NetBios) on all remote sites running on the network. The serial interface of the hub site router keeps on receiving broadcast. What does this broadcast come from ? Are they netbios broadcast from the remote netbios broadcast ? Can I use dlsw icannotreach SAP f0 on the remote routers to filter it out ? _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8162&t=8116 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Simulator [7:8132]
I dont think there is any such thing as an "affordable" ISDN simulator but i got the Emutel Solo and it works like a champ. It has configurable S/T or U interfaces and supports all kinds of switch types. It is comparable to the Teltone ILS 2000 ($2800) and the price direct from Arca technologies is $1995. The only problem is that buying it direct is a HUGE pain in the butt. I eventually bought mine from the supplier that is associated with ccbootcamp.com. It was more then the direct price but saved a lot of time an hassle. They sell for pretty big bucks on Ebay so i figure if after i am done with it i can sell it for 70% of what i payed it isn't so painful. HTH Ed ""Raul F. Fernandez-IGLOU"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I recommend the Teltone demonstrator for the a lab setup. Thats the one I > use. I got it for 1685.00 > > Raul > - Original Message - > From: "Tariq Azad" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:17 AM > Subject: ISDN Simulator [7:8132] > > > > Hello Group ! > > > > Which ISDN simulator is an affordable and cheap for preparation of CCIE > Lab. > > > > Thanks > > > > TARIQ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8163&t=8132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX static addreess translation updated [7:8090]
Have you allowed pings through the PIX? --- Gary Crouch wrote: > config as below > > Address translation unable to pass traffic to server > farm > Have static and conduits configured > added static route on fire wall to Internal router > have statics routes on internal router to ISP router > also have routes on > servers > > > Internet router---Outside int /-PIX---Inside > int---Internal router-ISP > router-Server farm > >| > > Intern > al networks > > > I can ping the Server farm from the PIX inside > interface > I can ping the PIX inside interface from the server > farm > Can not ping server farm from outside network > tracert from outside traces to ISP router and then > drops out > Can ping and access conduited servers on Internal > networks. > can ping ISP router from Internal router but can > ping servers > can ping and access server from internal network > can ping internal network from Server farm > a tracert from server farm hangs at ISP router alt-c > cause trace to complete > > What am I missing?? > > > Thanks for your help > config as below Address translation unable to pass > traffic to server farm > Have static and conduits configured added static > route on fire wall to > Internal routerhave statics routes on internal > router to ISP router also > have routes on servers Internet router---Outside > int > -PIX---Inside int---Internal router-ISP > router-Server > farm > | > > > Internal networks I can ping the Server farm from > the PIX inside > interfaceI can ping the PIX inside interface from > the server farmCan not > ping server farm from outside networktracert from > outside traces to ISP > router and then drops outCan ping and access > conduited servers on > Internal networks.can ping ISP router from Internal > router but can ping > servers can ping and access server from internal > networkcan ping internal > network from Server farma tracert from server farm > hangs at ISP router > alt-c cause trace to complete What am I missing?? > Thanks for your help [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8164&t=8090 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6509 Configuration [7:8154]
Thanks Gonzalo, I think I may have enough information to make it work now. If now, I will email back. Can I email you directly. Mike "Gonzalo P." wrote: > Friend, > > What you are trying to do is not hard, but, you need to go through a few > steps. > I imagine you have an MSFC card inside... > > - Do a show modules and check if you can see it in slot 15 (and if it is in > state "ok") > - Try doing a session 15 (you should get to the router> prompt on the MSFC > - Configure the normal stuff in the router (password, vty, hostname etc...) > (just to check that the router is working fine) > > Go back to the switch and create the VLANS (maybe you already did this) > Add VTP information (if you need it) > > Go back to the MSFC > create the VLANS matching the ones you created in the switch... ( INT VLAN > 3, ETC...) > Do a NO SHUT in each one of them, > > __ > > you will be ready to assign ports to in the Switch to each vlan, > communication will flow through the routing card.. > > You can later do more things on the config.. Like adding OSPF or whaterver > you are trying to accomplish. > > Good Luck > -Gonzalo. > > ""Michael Oaks"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to configure a 6509 switch with multiple VLANS. I have the > > configuration guide printed out and believe that I have most of the > > configuration correct but I can't get it to communicate with anything. > > My question first is; do I have to configure anything in the router > > portion of the unit. When ever I try to enter commands in the router > > portion, they do not show up in the router configuration. I have been > > trying to configure it similar to my 5505 switch, but this does not seem > > to be working. What do I need to do to configure the router section. > > > > Also, is there anything that needs to be done to link the router to the > > switch or are they automatically linked. I need to have this configured > > and tested by this friday, so any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8165&t=8154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Configuring Priority and Class based on traffic type. [7:8166]
Hi, I have a CISCO 2503 and connected to a 64K frame relay link carrying all types of data. So i want to prioritize important traffic. I found out a simple method would be to classify data in classes and then set priority to calsses. Can anybody give me more information on this or links to any documetns which wi;ll help me do this. Thanks, Chetan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8166&t=8166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Route Updates and Fast Switching Cache [7:8110]
Thanks to all who responded! My confusion was that I expected the fast switching cache to be cleared for a given route if a new route was installed into the routing table. So, let me see if I have this straight: Routing table contains a route for a.b.c.d. The first packet is process switched no matter what switching mode is enabled. In the case of fast switching this populates the route cache and any subsequent packets will be forwarded using the cached entry--and here's where I was confused--even if a subsequent equal-cost route is installed into the RIB. Only after the cache is invalidated by other methods will the the router repopulate the cache with both entries because the process-switched packet now has two choices available in the RIB. Is that essentially correct? I was under the mistaken impression that the cache was more closely linked with the route installation process. Here is a related question that I'll have to check into: if a route is cached but then subsequently disappears from the routing table, does the router continue to route using the cached entry or does it invalidate the cache immediately at that point? CCO, here I come. Thanks all, John >>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" 6/12/01 7:14:06 AM >>> >After reading a practice test question and answer I'm confused about the >operation of fast switching, specifically when a route has already been >cached when a new equal-cost route is learned via a different interface. >For example: > >Route A learns of 192.168.1.0/24 via e0 with a metric of 1000. Fast >switching is enabled so this route is cached. Then the router learns of >192.168.1.0/24 with a metric of 1000 via e1. My thinking is that the cache >would be invalidated and recreated with two entries but the test engine >answer stated that routing would not change because the route was cached and >the cache would not be invalidated. > >Any thoughts? I'd test this myself but at the moment I only have two >routers at home. Do any of you have any experience with this? > >Thanks, >John > If I understand the question, the answer is correct. Where you are getting confused is the difference in load balancing between process switching and fast switching. Essentially, your thinking is correct if the interface were in process switching mode, which does per-packet load balancing. I'll make the minor nit that process switching has no cache, but looks things up directly in the RIB (i.e., main routing table). Formally, per-packet is deterministic rather than statistical load balancing. Fast switching uses per-destination load balancing. It will only have one cached entry to any destination; the load balancing comes as a result of having many cached entries to many destinations. Per-destination load balancing is statistical, not deterministic, and indeed can get unbalanced with a small number of destination. CEF uses source-destination pair load balancing, which is still statistical but increases the number of choices and reduces the probability that the load will be unbalanced onto one interface in a group. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8167&t=8110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IP address [7:8106] Subnet calculator [7:8106]
Yes, I like the Solar Winds calc but the one from Boson (for free) @ www.boson.com is also worth a try. Dom. "Waters, Kris - TS/Corporate" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IP address [7:8106] Subnet calculator [7:8106] Sent by: nobody@groupstu dy.com 12/06/2001 14:55 Please respond to "Waters, Kris - TS/Corporate" There's a pretty good free one at www.solarwinds.net then click the Free Tools link. Kris. -Original Message- From: Bryan In Richmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IP address [7:8106] Subnet calculator [7:8149] Try this when you are online and use the atachment if it gets through. http://www.agt.net/public/sparkman/netcalc.htm Otherwise if the attachment does not get through go to dogpile.com and search for "subnet calculator" Bryan - Original Message - From: "parky chan" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:41 AM Subject: IP address [7:8106] > what is the fast and easy method to count I.P and subnet mask > can you help me ? [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-zip-compressed which had a name of ipsbnet.zip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8168&t=8106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing Table Question [7:8103]
I saw a question that asked "what does the time value represent in a routing table entry?" I didn't know if right off the top of my head but figured it out. I then thought that there would probably be more questions of this type on the exam and should know what all the fields represent. Hopefully there is a magical link that will explain them. -Original Message- From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Routing Table Question [7:8103] This is kind of a tall order... I know what you are asking, but it's somewhat rare that you would see a routing table with multiple routing protocols. I mean, you may have BGP running over OSPF as an IGP (carrying the routes internal), but the Show IP Route really means slightly different things for each routing protocol. I'm sure you are aware of the legend @ the top of your Show IP Route output. I think this is why screen shots & explanations will generally be found under BGP, OSPF, RIP, etc. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial _r/drdshoil.htm#xtocid252275 Not a great link... Can you tell us what you are having the greatest difficulty with, then maybe we could work backwards (assuming a better link cannot be found). Phil - Original Message - From: Bolton, Travis To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:59 PM Subject: Routing Table Question [7:8103] > Team, > > Can anybody provide me with a link to where I can find detailed descriptions > as to what every aspect of the routing table fields mean. I looked on the > Cisco Web site but couldn't find what I was looking for. Thanks in > advance... > > Regards, > > Travis Bolton > Network Engineer II > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8169&t=8103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6509 Configuration [7:8154]
Well, Better email the group, someone else might benefit from the post. Just let me know what problems are you having and we will make it work. G. ""Michael Oaks"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thanks Gonzalo, > > I think I may have enough information to make it work now. If now, I will > email back. > Can I email you directly. > > Mike > > "Gonzalo P." wrote: > > > Friend, > > > > What you are trying to do is not hard, but, you need to go through a few > > steps. > > I imagine you have an MSFC card inside... > > > > - Do a show modules and check if you can see it in slot 15 (and if it is in > > state "ok") > > - Try doing a session 15 (you should get to the router> prompt on the MSFC > > - Configure the normal stuff in the router (password, vty, hostname etc...) > > (just to check that the router is working fine) > > > > Go back to the switch and create the VLANS (maybe you already did this) > > Add VTP information (if you need it) > > > > Go back to the MSFC > > create the VLANS matching the ones you created in the switch... ( INT VLAN > > 3, ETC...) > > Do a NO SHUT in each one of them, > > > > __ > > > > you will be ready to assign ports to in the Switch to each vlan, > > communication will flow through the routing card.. > > > > You can later do more things on the config.. Like adding OSPF or whaterver > > you are trying to accomplish. > > > > Good Luck > > -Gonzalo. > > > > ""Michael Oaks"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I am trying to configure a 6509 switch with multiple VLANS. I have the > > > configuration guide printed out and believe that I have most of the > > > configuration correct but I can't get it to communicate with anything. > > > My question first is; do I have to configure anything in the router > > > portion of the unit. When ever I try to enter commands in the router > > > portion, they do not show up in the router configuration. I have been > > > trying to configure it similar to my 5505 switch, but this does not seem > > > to be working. What do I need to do to configure the router section. > > > > > > Also, is there anything that needs to be done to link the router to the > > > switch or are they automatically linked. I need to have this configured > > > and tested by this friday, so any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mike Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8170&t=8154 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ISDN Simulator [7:8132]
Tariq, I have ISDN simulators for sale at #1000.00+Ship+VAT. 2B+D, perfect for your routers to connect to S/T RJ45 Presentation. If you are in the UK, you can come over and try them before you buy. Rashid Lohiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] 020 8509 2990 07785 362626 www.pioneer-computers.com ""Tariq Azad"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello Group ! > > Which ISDN simulator is an affordable and cheap for preparation of CCIE Lab. > > Thanks > > TARIQ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8171&t=8132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Configuring Priority and Class based on traffic type. [7:8172]
Go to CCO and search for CBWFQ and LLQ. We are using these methods right now and I really enjoy the level of traffic control I have. There are too many examples to list so just look up those pages on CCO and the rest is pretty easy. Let us know if you run into any difficulties and we should be able to help. Oh, I almost forgot, I think you need at least IOS 12.0 to do this, possibly even 12.1, so make sure you have a recent IOS version. HTH, John >>> "Chetan" 6/12/01 8:51:50 AM >>> Hi, I have a CISCO 2503 and connected to a 64K frame relay link carrying all types of data. So i want to prioritize important traffic. I found out a simple method would be to classify data in classes and then set priority to calsses. Can anybody give me more information on this or links to any documetns which wi;ll help me do this. Thanks, Chetan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8172&t=8172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccie written materials [7:8099]
I also very want to have.. "tim" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8174&t=8099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Time for CCIE LAB?? [7:7931]
BJ, Your documentation approach will probably earn you many points in the lab. But IMHO put it on paper. The lab elves will mess with whatever they can. - susan > From: Bradley J. Wilson > One thing I'm curious about, and this is because I've found > this to be an invaluable tool to use while studying various lab scenarios - > are the PCs in the lab full Windows 9x/2k installations, including Notepad? > I've found that making a consolidated list of interfaces and associated > IP addresses, as well as a list of all networks w/ subnets being used, I can > avoid potential problems and look up what an address is supposed to be very > quickly by having it all in one (electronic) spot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8175&t=7931 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have noticed that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. I'm aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not have thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? Pardon this trivial question but it would help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8177&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URGENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [7:8061]
Yes the bandwidth statement is'nt necessary but you do need a clock statement while configuring a DCE. Jayant - Click here for Free Video!! http://www.gohip.com/free_video/ - Original Message - From: "Ole Drews Jensen" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:41 PM Subject: RE: URGENT ! [7:8061] > Hth, well, you can't really answer that, since you didn't ask the question > can you??? > > The bandwitdh statement is NOT necessary, but it is always "nice" to add > while you're there anyway, so your routing protocols can make decisions > based on it. > > I don't know what you're trying to say with your "in your case" quote, but > please don't insult me or other people on this list. I can make mistakes too > - I am human in case you were wondering. > > What's wrong with "Excuse me sir/madam, but I believe you made a mistake in > your reply to mr/ms". > > I do not have my routers setup at this point because I had to move them, so > I can't test it at this moment, but I am fairly sure in my argument that you > can see if your interface is DTE or DCE by doing a show int. > > Ole > > ~~~ > Ole Drews Jensen > Systems Network Manager > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I > RWR Enterprises, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > > > > -Original Message- > From: andyh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: URGENT ! [7:8061] > > > Hth? well, not really > > what, exactly, is a bandwidth statement going to achieve?? would you enable > MultiLink-PPP by adding "bandwidth 128000" to a BRI interface? - well > probably in your case > > Oh yeh, and use "show controllers" for determining DCE/DTE > > do we really have to put up with yet another "how do I connect routers > back-to-back" question. > > I despair of this list sometimes > > A > > Ole Drews Jensen wrote on Monday June 11 at 2001 11:15 PM > > Also remember only to add the clockrate and bandwidth commands on the > router > > interfaces acting as DCE ports. > > > > When you do a show int, you can see if it's acting like DCE or DTE. > > > > Hth, > > > > Ole > >Neil Schneider wrote on Monday, June 11 at 2001 4:48 PM > > Are you using the correct crossover cables? > > > > Neil > > > > ""Ravi Varma"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Guys > > > > > > We have 10 3640 Routers at our place > > > the probelm i am facing is that i have to connec all these ten routers > > back > > > to > > > back each router have 2 FE and one T1 (dsu/csu) > > > > > > When i tried to connect then back to back through the serial line > > > using show int > > > > > > Serial 0/0 down and line protocol DOWn > > > > > > i had assigned Ip address > > > assigned the clock rate 64000 > > > no shut > > > and default encapsultaion (hdlc) > > > > > > and other i had gone through the same procedure but not assigned the > > clock > > > rate > > > > > > can u please help me on that it i have to get it up by evening > > > > > > Thanking you guys in advance > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Ravi Varma _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8176&t=8061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
you should enable portfast (diasbles stp) this should speed things up Cheers Colin At 11:29 AM 6/12/01 -0400, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: >We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have >noticed >that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it >takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. I'm >aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not have >thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the >network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? >Pardon this trivial question but it would help. Colin Byelong Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Group Information Systems Division University College London Gower Street Phone: 020 7679-2572 London WC1E 6BT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8179&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IP address [7:8106]
This is a very good tutorial on IP addressing: http://www.3com.com/solutions/en_US/ncs/501302.html The fast and easy method is to study and practice. Write out what you are doing. It may seem difficult. One day it will all make sense and thereafter will be easy. > -Original Message- > From: parky chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: IP address [7:8106] > > > what is the fast and easy method to count I.P and subnet mask > can you help me ? > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8178&t=8106 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: retransmissions [7:7731]
I like that "plain English" part; the computer people I know do not normally speak plain English. Actually, I've had some fascinating (to a computer person) times with a Sniffer and retransmissions. My aging DSS' expert analysis feature does allow for quick 'drill downs', and is vastly superior, still, to Microsoft's useful network monitor. Using this, one of my more interesting finds was with an I/C seismometer using IP to transmit information packets to a mini-cpu down at the university. Had a 'retransmit' error every three packets. The geologist were happy, the data was transferred and processed ok. The Sniffer's increments of red numbers, however, were quite annoying. The 'retransmitted' packets were different sizes. The sequence number from the instrument side, however, did not change. This, I believe, is one of the 'definitions' of a retransmit. This was not, however, an error condition, except in the protocol violation. As happens with good test equipment, I persuaded the U. to replace the NIC card and all was again sweetness and light. There are other, more mundane, natural acts of retransmits. It's fun to watch outside/inside IP traffic once in a while. Besides, it would give you a 'feel' for what looks 'good' sos't when it's very, very bad, you have some baseline for a troubleshooting start. And a baseline that 30% is too much on a sustained basis. Very best, G. -Original Message- From: Nick R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: retransmissions [7:7731] Forget about AutoNegotiation and set all nodes to manual 10 or 100 Mbps. Also, Priscilla had some good questions. What kind of retransmissions are those? What layer? The Expert Software in the Sniffer will tell you the details broken down to a plain english language. -- Nick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8180&t=7731 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Flash problem [7:7844]
It's a 7206. When I did a "dir disk0:" instead, I got %Error opening disk0:/ (Invalid DOS media or no media in slot). Actually, I have a few files saved in the flash card. I can delete and squeeze, but not save. John - Original Message - From: "David C Prall" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:23 PM Subject: Re: Flash problem [7:7844] > This could also be a 7200 with the ATA Flash Disks. What happens if you > attempt to do a "dir disk0:" instead of slot0: > > The flash disks are also Type 2 cards, instead of Type 1. Therefore they are > thicker. > > David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > - Original Message - > From: "Bob S" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:57 AM > Subject: Re: Flash problem [7:7844] > > > > I don'know if anyone rsponded to this yet but this usually means that the > > PCMCIA card is in a different format. Trying formatting the flash card > and > > read it again. I assume that this is flash card on a catalyst? > > > > > > >From: "John" > > >Reply-To: "John" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Flash problem [7:7844] > > >Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 14:03:05 -0400 > > > > > >Anyone know what's wrong? When I tried to save the running configuration > to > > >the flash, there is an error. > > > > > >%Error opening slot0:file (File system is in an inconsistent state) > > > > > >TIA, > > >John > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8181&t=7844 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
... and is spanning tree active on that interface? > -Original Message- > From: Larry Ogun-Banjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177] > > > We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and > 69xx. I have > noticed > that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity > on the ports, it > takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with > another device. I'm > aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but > I would not have > thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that > would speedup the > network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? > Pardon this trivial question but it would help. > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8182&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871]
I'm not even sure if there's a CCIE test center in Australia, but, if there is, let's not be too hasty in assuming English, American, or Australian. American candidate to Australian proctor, probably ok: "ping that row-ter" English candidate to Australian proctor, "ping that root-er," and the candidate immediately makes inappropriate physical contact with the person in the apparently appropriate direction. Vaguely reminded of the Battle of Britain veteran, waving his hands and ranting "there were fokkers to the left of me, fokkers to the right of me..." and being interrupted with "There weren't any Fokkers in the Battle of Britain!" "What does that have to do with it? These fokkers were Messerschmidts!" (Wondering if this will get through the filters). >On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Kevin Wigle wrote: > >> I wasn't aware that an extended exam was anymore different than "normal" >> exams except you get more time. >> >> If this truly is the only difference I'm not sure what your point is. If >> you, a good English speaker can do the test in 1 hour, then - you're done. >> Doesn't matter if the exam has allotted 2 hours or 3 hours, you're done in > > 1. > >Picture the following aborted recruiter interview: > >Me: "I'm a CCNP and CCDP..." > >Recruiter: (interrupts me) "You passed the extended exams, not the >standard ones. You're not a true CCNP and CCDP. You won't do. Good bye." > >(OK, this is slightly exaggerated, but it should give you the gist.) > >> I don't think too many people from the US/Canada are going to hop a plane >to >> get that extra 30 minutes test time. Perhaps someone in Brittain would >take >> the train to France? that would probably bump the effective price up a >bit. > >Well, now that you mention it... A Briton would have to hop onto a train >or plane to Brussels to take the CCIE lab. So would a German, a Greek, >or a Spaniard. I don't remember anything in the CCIE lab blueprint that >mentioned granting an extra 2 hours, or half-day, or whatever, to >candidates who don't speak natively whatever language(s) the lab >documents are written in and or the lab proctors speak or mangle. That >sounds inconsistent with the stated goals, esp. when the CCIE written >*has* the extension. > >> I agree with your point #1 and with that a candidate should be able to >elect >> to take a non-extended exam. However, a problem could present itself later >> if a candidate failed the exam and then complained he didn't understand the >> consequences of not taking an extended exam! :-) I don't think that Vue >or >> Prometric want to be responsible for having to first judge the English >> proficiency of a candidate. > >Amusingly, at least one Prometric testing center in Paris also offers an >ESL proficiency exam. But you're right, they shouldn't have to. However, >there are ways around this, such as letting you (the candidate) take the >exam again for free, perhaps limiting that to cases where you appear to >be in good faith and or didn't fail the exam abismally (which could be >decided by the number of correct answers to questions you had time to >answer before the ax felt). Also, the policy is cisco's, and my email >was addressed to cisco. > >> Your point #2 probably wasn't thought of in that way because that would be >> politcally incorrect and nobody wants that :-) > >OK, so I'm blunt and unsubtle. :-) I'm curious, though: what would be a >newspeak way of stating it without making it meaningless? > >> Your point #3 would require in my opinion that the option to accept/deny >the >> extended exam would have to be asked in the candidate's native language. >> Now imagine how interesting that could get... > >I must have a pedestrian imagination, because all solutions to that that >I could think of are uninteresting. > >- If registering online: IMHO, someone who could navigate the test > center's web pages should be able to understand a warning, or a > mention, in plain English right at the point the option is offered. > >- If registering in person or on the phone: you would presumably speak > to someone (an administrative assistant or receptionist, perhaps) who > speaks the same language as you. > >> Unless the exam content is easier somehow, I think you're over-reacting a >> little bit. I would just accept the time and probably never use it (I >> hope). > >And I may well end up doing that myself. Indeed, I did in the past. But >who said I can't try to change that policy and or get a good rant out of >it at the same time? 'Sides which, I have to live up to my reputation as >a loudmouth and a curmudgeon, don't I? :-) > >> Kevin Wigle >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "ElephantChild" >> To: >> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 10:32 AM >> Subject: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871] >> >> > This is a copy of a message I sent to cisco training about hidden >> > dangers of extended exams. Thoughtful comments and answering rants are >> > equally
RE: Routing Table Question [7:8103]
It occurred to me that everything you want to know is on CCO. The problem as always is how to find it. One of the required CCIE skill sets is ability to find information on the document CD, of which there is an on-line version at: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/home/home.htm First place to check is either the config guides or the command references. Having looked there, I found a couple you might want to peruse. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r /iprprt2/1rdindep.htm#xtocid2797042 watch the word wrap http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ssr83/rpc_r/53992.h tm watch the wrap - and it IS there someplace - down towards the end :-> for BGP: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_r /iprprt2/1rdbgp.htm#xtocid1885372 definitely watch the wrap here CCO can be a pain sometimes. But it is ALL there. Over on the CCIE list, one constant is the advice to learn how to use and search through these references. Doing it by entering a search phrase on the home page is generally useless. HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bolton, Travis Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: Routing Table Question [7:8103] I saw a question that asked "what does the time value represent in a routing table entry?" I didn't know if right off the top of my head but figured it out. I then thought that there would probably be more questions of this type on the exam and should know what all the fields represent. Hopefully there is a magical link that will explain them. -Original Message- From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Routing Table Question [7:8103] This is kind of a tall order... I know what you are asking, but it's somewhat rare that you would see a routing table with multiple routing protocols. I mean, you may have BGP running over OSPF as an IGP (carrying the routes internal), but the Show IP Route really means slightly different things for each routing protocol. I'm sure you are aware of the legend @ the top of your Show IP Route output. I think this is why screen shots & explanations will generally be found under BGP, OSPF, RIP, etc. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/dial _r/drdshoil.htm#xtocid252275 Not a great link... Can you tell us what you are having the greatest difficulty with, then maybe we could work backwards (assuming a better link cannot be found). Phil - Original Message - From: Bolton, Travis To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:59 PM Subject: Routing Table Question [7:8103] > Team, > > Can anybody provide me with a link to where I can find detailed descriptions > as to what every aspect of the routing table fields mean. I looked on the > Cisco Web site but couldn't find what I was looking for. Thanks in > advance... > > Regards, > > Travis Bolton > Network Engineer II > CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8184&t=8103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871]
and in that vein (curmudgeons and such .. :-)) How does anyone except you, know that you took an "extended" exam? On the Galton site, does it say you passed CIT Extended or just CIT? Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "ElephantChild" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:39 AM Subject: Re: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871] > On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Kevin Wigle wrote: > > > I wasn't aware that an extended exam was anymore different than "normal" > > exams except you get more time. > > > > If this truly is the only difference I'm not sure what your point is. If > > you, a good English speaker can do the test in 1 hour, then - you're done. > > Doesn't matter if the exam has allotted 2 hours or 3 hours, you're done in > > 1. > > Picture the following aborted recruiter interview: > > Me: "I'm a CCNP and CCDP..." > > Recruiter: (interrupts me) "You passed the extended exams, not the > standard ones. You're not a true CCNP and CCDP. You won't do. Good bye." > > (OK, this is slightly exaggerated, but it should give you the gist.) > > > I don't think too many people from the US/Canada are going to hop a plane > to > > get that extra 30 minutes test time. Perhaps someone in Brittain would > take > > the train to France? that would probably bump the effective price up a > bit. > > Well, now that you mention it... A Briton would have to hop onto a train > or plane to Brussels to take the CCIE lab. So would a German, a Greek, > or a Spaniard. I don't remember anything in the CCIE lab blueprint that > mentioned granting an extra 2 hours, or half-day, or whatever, to > candidates who don't speak natively whatever language(s) the lab > documents are written in and or the lab proctors speak or mangle. That > sounds inconsistent with the stated goals, esp. when the CCIE written > *has* the extension. > > > I agree with your point #1 and with that a candidate should be able to > elect > > to take a non-extended exam. However, a problem could present itself later > > if a candidate failed the exam and then complained he didn't understand the > > consequences of not taking an extended exam! :-) I don't think that Vue > or > > Prometric want to be responsible for having to first judge the English > > proficiency of a candidate. > > Amusingly, at least one Prometric testing center in Paris also offers an > ESL proficiency exam. But you're right, they shouldn't have to. However, > there are ways around this, such as letting you (the candidate) take the > exam again for free, perhaps limiting that to cases where you appear to > be in good faith and or didn't fail the exam abismally (which could be > decided by the number of correct answers to questions you had time to > answer before the ax felt). Also, the policy is cisco's, and my email > was addressed to cisco. > > > Your point #2 probably wasn't thought of in that way because that would be > > politcally incorrect and nobody wants that :-) > > OK, so I'm blunt and unsubtle. :-) I'm curious, though: what would be a > newspeak way of stating it without making it meaningless? > > > Your point #3 would require in my opinion that the option to accept/deny > the > > extended exam would have to be asked in the candidate's native language. > > Now imagine how interesting that could get... > > I must have a pedestrian imagination, because all solutions to that that > I could think of are uninteresting. > > - If registering online: IMHO, someone who could navigate the test > center's web pages should be able to understand a warning, or a > mention, in plain English right at the point the option is offered. > > - If registering in person or on the phone: you would presumably speak > to someone (an administrative assistant or receptionist, perhaps) who > speaks the same language as you. > > > Unless the exam content is easier somehow, I think you're over-reacting a > > little bit. I would just accept the time and probably never use it (I > > hope). > > And I may well end up doing that myself. Indeed, I did in the past. But > who said I can't try to change that policy and or get a good rant out of > it at the same time? 'Sides which, I have to live up to my reputation as > a loudmouth and a curmudgeon, don't I? :-) > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "ElephantChild" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 10:32 AM > > Subject: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871] > > > > > This is a copy of a message I sent to cisco training about hidden > > > dangers of extended exams. Thoughtful comments and answering rants are > > > equally welcome. No flames, please. > > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > > > From: ElephantChild > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:51:08 +0200 (CEST) > > > Subject: CSIDS 2.0 beta: can I have the unextended version? > > > > > > On June 1st, I registered to take 9E1-572, the CSIDS 2.0 beta. I'm > > > sche
Re: IPSEC (ESP) over NAT ? [7:8150]
You just make an access-list that disables NAT for certain IP source/destination combinations. That way the client sitting behind the NAT server who goes through VPN will not be NAT'd when it tries to go through the VPN. This would obviously change the source IP and VPN would not allow it to pass through. I hope that's what you were looking for. It worked on a 2600 to PIX VPN solution with NAT on the 2600 and PIX both on a solution I implemented. It should be the same principle. Allen - Original Message - From: "Uniplace - Alexander Krastelev" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 8:39 AM Subject: IPSEC (ESP) over NAT ? [7:8150] > Hello, > > Does anyone know if Cisco IOS (any version) supports IPSEC passthrough over > NAT ? > > I need to make the following configuration running: > > [Server]---[VPN gateway]--internet-[Cisco1600,NAT][Client] > > - Client (a PC with IPSEC VPN client) should have access to Server over > IPSEC VPN > - Cisco 1600 makes NAT with overload > - IPSEC protocol is IPSEC ESP (not AH) > > I have two options: > -to do something with Cisco to let it pass IPSEC traffic; > -to switch VPN in UDP-encapsulated mode (IPSEC-over-UDP), which works over > the most dumb NAT (we have to pay for upgrade, however). > > So my question is, does Cisco suppport IPSEC passthrough ? > > Alexander Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8186&t=8150 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Policy Based Routing with MPLS (HELP) !!! [7:8185]
Hi All, Topology of my network. |--(fe)SB3(1.1.15.2) 1.1.13.1 |(fe) SB1 (fe) (fe)R3 (fddi)--(fddi)R5 (pos)--- (pos)R1 (pos)- (pos)R4(fe) -(fe)SB2(1.1.16.2) |(atm) |(atm) -- legend : R : CISCO 7505 routers running IOS 12.0(16)ST fe : fast ethernet atm : ATM POS : Packet over sonet FDDI : FDDI SB : smart bits SB1 has 2 streams of traffic. One destined to SB3 and another to SB2. I have two MPLS tunnels set up(tunnel 3 and tunnel 4). I am running OSPF as my intra domain routing protocol. Path for tunnel3 : R3 R5 R1 R4 Path for tunnel4 : R3 R5 R4 Pbm. : If I want the traffic reaching SB3 to go through tunnel 3 and the traffic reaching SB2 to go through tunnel 4, what am I supposed to do at router R3 I tried using policy based routing but I am not sure if I configured it the right way. The config I did for policy based routing is given below. Also, I understand that when I create a MPLS tunnel and reserve bandwith for QoS it is done from R3 to R4 and is not end to end. In order for me to do it end to end, how do I do it. (e.g.) the QoS is guaranteed only until the POS of R4 and not until the fe interface that connects R4 to SB3. access-list 2 permit 1.1.15.2 access-list 3 permit 1.1.16.2 route-map escher permit 10 match ip address 2 set interface Tunnel3 ! route-map escher1 permit 10 match ip address 3 set interface Tunnel4 ! interface tunnel 3 ip policy route-map escher ! interface tunnel 4 ip policy route-map escher1 When I start sending data from SB1 I see the traffic reaching SB2 and SB3 but the traffic flowing through tunnel4 is 0 and I presume traffic is flowing through the other tunnel. Another question I have is if I am sending about 100 Mbps of traffic thorugh SB1 towards SB2(50Mbps) and SB3(50 Mbps) then if the tunnel is configured only to carry 3 kbps of traffic, will any traffic go through the tunnel or would it just follow the shortest path provided by OSPF. I guess I want to know how to find out whether traffic is going through tunnel or through OSPF routing. Any pointers or reading material suggestions would be highly appreciated. Please help, thanks in advance and for your patience to read through my mail. Thanks, Krishnan. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8185&t=8185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PIX static address translation question [7:8031]
Yeah that's correct. Conduits still work on 5.3(1) on mine as well. I'm still planning on removing all conduit statements and replacing with ACLs soon to be ready for the change that Cisco keeps promising to put into effect so I'm not caught off guard. I haven't tried version 6 yet though so I'm not sure about that one. Allen - Original Message - From: "Evans, TJ" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:35 AM Subject: RE: PIX static address translation question [7:8031] > ... I am running 5.3(1) on a PIX520UR and use nothing but conduits ... and > all of my conduits still function ... > > > Thanks! > TJ > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Agnoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 20:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: PIX static address translation question [7:8031] > > If you are using IOS 5.23 or higher on the Pix, you can't use conduits > anymore. Access-Lists are the only supported way to permit inbound traffic. > (Really sucks when you upgrade a Pix running 5.12, with several hundred > conduits!!) > > The Conduit Permit ICMP any any command still works, but that's it. To > further confuse things, the firewall lets you add the conduit statement, but > ignores it. > > >>> "Allen May" 06/11/01 03:50PM >>> > If ICMP is disabled you won't be able to ping it. Conduit statements must > open the correct protocol & ports to connect as well. The router could > possibly be blocking ICMP or ports also. Can the inside machine ping the > inside interface of the PIX? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Gary Crouch" > To: > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:06 PM > Subject: PIX static address translation question [7:8031] > > > > we have servers hosted at a ISP and have a back port connection > > and would like to give a client access thur our back port using one of our > > external IP address I have configure a static address translation for the > > external ip address > > and added a route for the internal address I can pig the internal address > > from the PIX > > but can not ping the server with the external address from outside. > > does the static and conduit commands work when there is a router between > the > > server? > > is there a way to make this work? > > > > Thanks for your help > * > The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. > It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else > is unauthorized. > > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution > or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited > and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice > contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in > the governing KPMG client engagement letter. > * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8187&t=8031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
You are experiencing the Spanning Tree process, which blocks ports temporarily while it determines if you just have hosts connected to that port or if you are connecting additional switches. This process takes about 30 seconds. If you want to turn this off on a port-by-port basis you need to enable a feature called PortFast. I don't know the exact syntax on a 6500 so you'll have to check into that. HTH, John >>> "Larry Ogun-Banjo" 6/12/01 9:29:53 AM >>> We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have noticed that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. I'm aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not have thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? Pardon this trivial question but it would help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8188&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gre tunnel - ip and ipx packet loss -URGENT!!!!!!!! [7:8190]
hi all, We run a gre tunnel between sites across an isp network...sometimes we lose connectivity (ipx mainly and somtimes both IP & IPX) but the show tunnel and show interface commands gives an up, up status. The only thing unusual is that the show int f0/0 commands reveals a rising number of packets deferred. what does the ' deferred' signify and can anybody pls come up with tips on making this tunnel a trouble free one. regards, John _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8190&t=8190 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Policy Based Routing with MPLS (topology attached) [7:8189]
Hi All, I guess the topology I had drawn got truncated. You can have a look at the topology at http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/~krishnan/mpls/ Thanks and sorry for the trouble. Krishnan. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8189&t=8189 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tag-switching -vs- MPLS !!! [7:8059]
yes they will be fine all that MPLS is (from a config point of view ,and i know this is not strictly correct BUT) an addition to tag switching using traffic engineering ,QOS COS,RSVP,and other Extensions.the basic switching is still the same...that`s why the commands are the same,its just cisco has exteneded the commands and extended TAg-switching to run MPLS HTH steve No flames please >From: "Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan" >Reply-To: "Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Tag-switching -vs- MPLS !!! [7:8059] >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:28:22 -0400 > >Hi All, > >I have been receiving enumerous replies from people stating that >tag-switching was pre-developed MPLS by CISCO. I am looking for more >information as in what are its differences ???. > >If I am configuring something on a CISCO router to perform MPLS TE then >some configuration commands are tag-switching based, will they work if I >am doing mpls ??? > >Thanks, >Krishnan. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8191&t=8059 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
Larry, two things that can cause the delay: STP - Spanning Tree Protocol Solution: 'set spantree portfast enable' (Use it only on end-station ports) PAgP - Port Aggregation Protocol Solution: 'set port channel off' (PAgP is enabled by default on EtherChannel capable links) HTH Reinhold On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: > We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have > noticed > that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it > takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. I'm > aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not have > thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the > network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? > Pardon this trivial question but it would help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8192&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
Is spanning-tree running? ... or, to phrase it a little differently, have you enabled portfast on the port(s) in question? Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: Larry Ogun-Banjo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177] We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have noticed that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. I'm aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not have thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? Pardon this trivial question but it would help. * The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8193&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
Not quite correct. PortFast does not disable STP. It puts a port initially into 'Forwarding' state and then watches if loops occur. If for some reason the port is forced into 'Blocking' state and later needs to return to the 'Forwarding' state, it has to go through the 'Listening' and 'Learning' phases. hth Reinhold On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colin Byelong wrote: > you should enable portfast (diasbles stp) > this should speed things up > > Cheers > > Colin > > > > > At 11:29 AM 6/12/01 -0400, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: > >We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have > >noticed > >that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it > >takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. > I'm > >aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not > have > >thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the > >network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? > >Pardon this trivial question but it would help. > Colin Byelong Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Group > Information Systems Division > University College London > Gower Street Phone: 020 7679-2572 > London WC1E 6BT > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8194&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
Thanks for clarifying that. cheers Colin At 06:16 PM 6/12/01 +0200, Reinhold Fischer wrote: >Not quite correct. PortFast does not disable STP. It puts a port initially >into 'Forwarding' state and then watches if loops occur. If for some reason >the port is forced into 'Blocking' state and later needs to return to the >'Forwarding' state, it has to go through the 'Listening' and 'Learning' >phases. > >hth > >Reinhold > >On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colin Byelong wrote: > >> you should enable portfast (diasbles stp) >> this should speed things up >> >> Cheers >> >> Colin >> >> >> >> >> At 11:29 AM 6/12/01 -0400, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: >> >We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have >> >noticed >> >that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it >> >takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. >> I'm >> >aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not >> have >> >thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the >> >network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? >> >Pardon this trivial question but it would help. >> Colin Byelong Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Network Group >> Information Systems Division >> University College London >> Gower Street Phone: 020 7679-2572 >> London WC1E 6BT >> > -- Colin Byelong Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Group Information Systems Division University College London Gower Street Phone: 020 7679-2572 London WC1E 6BT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8195&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bandwidth Testing and Monitoring [7:8088]
not to sure if this will help, but i use a tool call solarwindsin it it has a tool call bandwidth monitor... aslong as the device has SNMP turned on it will tell you the overall bandwidth bieng used...Realtime as to finding out if your "let`s say" 256k cir is actually a 256k cir ...the only way i know of finding this out is by pushing the link to its fullist... you could interogate the CSU/DSU and do a "show controllers" apart from that you could possible buy "Net-sys" toll analysis hth steve >From: "Swart Douwe" >Reply-To: "Swart Douwe" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Bandwidth Testing and Monitoring [7:8088] >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:01:10 -0400 > >Thanks for your reply Brian. > >Will the snmp gathering only give you the packet status and the >configuration that you put into the interface configuration? > >What I am trying to gather is whether the bandwidth that we think we have >is >actually what we have available to us? > >Will the snmp gathering allow us to do this > > >Douwe > > -Original Message- > From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:20 AM > To: Swart Douwe > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:Re: Bandwidth Testing and Monitoring >[7:8088] > > snmp gathering on the relevant serial interface?? > > Brian "Sonic" Whalen > Success = Preparation + Opportunity > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Swart Douwe wrote: > > > Is anyone aware of an application or tool that I can use >to monitor the > > exact bandwidth available on a Frame Relay or ISDN >connection? > > > > The purpose of this is for software testing I need to >determine the exact > > bandwidth requirements and load on either a Frame or ISDN >connection. > > > > Is there any software applications that can do this, or do >I need to look at > > a hardware device to do so? Any recommendations on >software or hardware? > > > > Any help that anyone could give would be greatly >appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > > > Douwe > > > > > > Visit our Website : http://www.traveland.com.au > > > > Disclaimer - This message and any attachments are >confidential and may > > contain privileged information intended only for the use >of the addressee > > named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this >message you are > > hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution >or reproduction of > > this message is prohibited. If you have received this >message in error > > please notify Traveland Pty Ltd immediately by return >email. Any views > > expressed in this message are those of the individual >sender and may not > > necessarily reflect the views of Traveland Pty Ltd.. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >Visit our Website : http://www.traveland.com.au > >Disclaimer - This message and any attachments are confidential and may >contain privileged information intended only for the use of the addressee >named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are >hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction >of >this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error >please notify Traveland Pty Ltd immediately by return email. Any views >expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not >necessarily reflect the views of Traveland Pty Ltd.. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8196&t=8088 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing file permissions [7:8197]
hello group, I have a problem copying running-config to a file on the bootflash: directory on my GSR. The file that I want to copy to is read-only. How can I change the permissions on the file? Please have a look at the output of the commands bellow to see what the problem is. GSR14#copy run bootflash:default.config Destination filename [default.config]? %Warning:There is a file already existing with this name Do you want to over write? [confirm] %Error opening bootflash:default.config (File is read-only) GSR14#dir bootflash: Directory of bootflash:/ 1 -rw-2070 Apr 16 2001 20:29:52 default.config 2 -rw- 7299020 May 17 2001 19:07:25 gsr-boot-mz.120-16.ST.bin 3 -rw-7067 May 17 2001 23:25:47 current.config Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8197&t=8197 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Policy Based Routing with MPLS (HELP) !!! [7:8185]
this is how your pbr should look like: route-map escher1 permit 10 match ip address 3 set interface Tunnel4 route-map escher1 permit 20 match ip address 2 set interface Tunnel3 and then under the interface where the traffic is originating from, you apply the pbr if it is fastethernet int fa0/0/0 ip add ip policy route-map escher1 Enjoy, Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8199&t=8185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gre tunnel - ip and ipx packet loss -URGENT!!!!!!!! [7:8201]
How is the FastEthernet 0/0 connected to the LAN ? Deferred means that the frame was discarded due to too many consecutive collisions on the medium. The router tried to send the frame to the ethernet a few times but it had no success - collisions always occured and the frame got discarded. Can you check how the Router is connected to the LAN ? Is it a shared medium with many stations accessing it ? How many percent of the packets outgoing to the fa0/0 get errors ? It may be well possible that the problem is not the tunnel hth Reinhold On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, John Kale wrote: > hi all, > We run a gre tunnel between sites across an isp network...sometimes we lose > connectivity (ipx mainly and somtimes both IP & IPX) but the show tunnel and > show interface commands gives an up, up status. > > The only thing unusual is that the show int f0/0 commands reveals a rising > number of packets deferred. what does the ' deferred' signify and > can anybody pls come up with tips on making this tunnel a trouble free one. > > regards, > > > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8201&t=8201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
Many thanks for everyones contribution on this issue. I forgot to mention that Spanning tree is not enabled. No tbeing too familiar with switches, I'm not sure on the effect of PAgP. Reinhold Fischer on 06/12/2001 06:09:51 PM To: Larry Ogun-Banjo/EN/Kpn-Orange@kpn-orange cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177] Larry, two things that can cause the delay: STP - Spanning Tree Protocol Solution: 'set spantree portfast enable' (Use it only on end-station ports) PAgP - Port Aggregation Protocol Solution: 'set port channel off' (PAgP is enabled by default on EtherChannel capable links) HTH Reinhold On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: > We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have > noticed > that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it > takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. I'm > aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not have > thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the > network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? > Pardon this trivial question but it would help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8202&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco IOS Firewall vc Cisco PIX Firewall [7:8200]
Does anybody know the major differences between these two firewall solutions? In this particular situation performance is not an issue. Is a properly configured router using IOS firewall any less secure than using a PIX? Regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8200&t=8200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CIM Expert Labs .... Opinions????? [7:7938]
just for a game. -- E+MxOk!*!* J2C4JGMCSE#?J2C4JGCCNP#? NRJGMCSE#,NRJGCCNP#!#! =qLl5DNRR@H;Hg4KN^V*#!#!#! N(SPNR5DIBM THINKPAD#,0iNRKD4&4354!-!- !*!*E]E]Az#!#! ^_^From Cisco Dream Station^_^ ""Steve Brokaw"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has anyone tried the CIM (Cisco Interactive Mentor) Expert Labs?? Are > they of any use at all > > Steve Brokaw, MCSE CCDA CCNP > Sr. Network Engineer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8203&t=7938 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ccie written materials [7:8099]
how can i get it? and i have something for ccie write too -- E+MxOk!*!* J2C4JGMCSE#?J2C4JGCCNP#? NRJGMCSE#,NRJGCCNP#!#! =qLl5DNRR@H;Hg4KN^V*#!#!#! N(SPNR5DIBM THINKPAD#,0iNRKD4&4354!-!- !*!*E]E]Az#!#! ^_^From Cisco Dream Station^_^ ""William"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I also very want to have.. > > "tim" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8204&t=8099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
EtherChannel allows you to bundle physical links into one logical link. As example you can create a 200Mpbs pipe out of 2 100Mbps links. PAgP is the protocol that negotiates this channel. PAgP is by default active on all ports that are EtherChannel capable. PAgP uses the first 15 to 20 seconds after link initialization to try to negotiate an EtherChannel. If you don't intend to use EtherChannel you can safely disable PAgP. Greetings Reinhold On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: > Many thanks for everyones contribution on this issue. I forgot to mention that > Spanning tree is not enabled. No tbeing too familiar with switches, I'm not sure > on the effect of PAgP. > > > Reinhold Fischer on 06/12/2001 06:09:51 PM > > To: Larry Ogun-Banjo/EN/Kpn-Orange@kpn-orange > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177] > > Larry, > > two things that can cause the delay: > > STP - Spanning Tree Protocol > > Solution: 'set spantree portfast enable' > (Use it only on end-station ports) > > PAgP - Port Aggregation Protocol > > Solution: 'set port channel off' > (PAgP is enabled by default on EtherChannel capable links) > > HTH > > Reinhold > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: > > > We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have > > noticed > > that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it > > takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. I'm > > aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not have > > thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the > > network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? > > Pardon this trivial question but it would help. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8205&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
passed switching test! [7:8207]
I did it890 on my test and there was one question that I didn't even answer. It had two screens and was a fill in the blank where I was supposed to write in domain name, ip address and the vlan numbers and name. I hit the wrong button and went to the next question...darn... It was relatively an easy easy exam and only took me 20 minutes. My scores were: CGMP100% Cisco Fundamentals 100% Multicast100% Multilayer Switching 83% Spanning Tree 75% Switching Interconnectivity 90% Troubleshooting 100% Trunking 75% VLAN Operations 66% My next test will be the routing one. But first I want to figure out what the heck falls under the catagory of vlan operations. With no experience, I will be sadly lacking in skills if I don't know that. Thanks everyone for all the wonderful discussions. That and tim boyes and sybex and the cisco university helped me achieve this. And my very very very patient husband. Jennifer Cribbs Have a great day!! Jennifer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8207&t=8207 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A bit & C bit [7:8206]
6/12/2001 11:00am Tuesday =20 How should a source station interpret a frame returned with the A bit set but not the C bit ? =20 =20 Richard L. Pickard CCNP NNCSE MCSE A+ Corporate PC Source [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 (630) 508-1508 =20 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of btzhsepa.gif] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Network Blitz Bkgrd.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8206&t=8206 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cable modem connection and a Cisco Router [7:8208]
Team, I have a cable modem connection, I want to be able to use my Cisco 1600 router, does any ones know I could find some information of how doing this, the problem that I see I that every time I reboot my router a new ip will be provided via DHCP...Is this possible, I have the impression that Cisco routers only works with static ip. Thanks in advanced on taking your time to reply JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8208&t=8208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
local resolution [7:8209]
6/12/2001 11:01am Tuesday =20 Which protocols use local resolution to bind the network layer to the link layer ? =20 Richard L. Pickard CCNP NNCSE MCSE A+ Corporate PC Source [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 (630) 508-1508 =20 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of btzhsepa.gif] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of Network Blitz Bkgrd.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8209&t=8209 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177]
it'll speed things upp, but it sure as hell will NOT disable STP on that interface. Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks - Original Message - From: Colin Byelong To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:36 AM Subject: Re: fao: Catalyst Gurus [7:8177] > you should enable portfast (diasbles stp) > this should speed things up > > Cheers > > Colin > > > > > At 11:29 AM 6/12/01 -0400, Larry Ogun-Banjo wrote: > >We have just installed some new catalyst switches 650x and 69xx. I have > >noticed > >that whenever I connected with a fluke to test connectivity on the ports, it > >takes approximately 20 secs to get its first contact with another device. > I'm > >aware the switch port needs to learn the mac address etc but I would not > have > >thought it would take so long. Are there any commands that would speedup the > >network discovery or is this normal behaviour on a new port? > >Pardon this trivial question but it would help. > Colin Byelong Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Network Group > Information Systems Division > University College London > Gower Street Phone: 020 7679-2572 > London WC1E 6BT > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8210&t=8177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cable modem connection and a Cisco Router [7:8208]
I use my 1605 at home for my cable modem connection. You need IOS 12.1 or later to make the router act as a DHCP client. Use "ip address dhcp" on the interface connected to the cable modem. One thing you have to be aware of (or maybe someone can provide a workaround for me?) is that I have to manually change the ip address of the NAT pool when my DHCP lease changes. I can however specify the ethernet interface in the static port mapping entries (PAT), which prevents me from having to change all of those. James Willard, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Juan Blanco" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:40 PM Subject: Cable modem connection and a Cisco Router [7:8208] > Team, > I have a cable modem connection, I want to be able to use my Cisco 1600 > router, does any ones know I could find some information of how doing this, > the problem > that I see I that every time I reboot my router a new ip will be provided > via DHCP...Is this possible, I have the impression that Cisco routers only > works with static ip. > > Thanks in advanced on taking your time to reply > > JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8211&t=8208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gre tunnel - ip and ipx packet loss -URGENT!!!!!!!! [7:8212]
deferred ..as far as i can remember that means either one of two things you interface is not working properly (joke)... the packets are defered because thet cannot be put onto the output buffer of the interface (sort-of)this has meant to me in the past either corrupt memeory/ios or a not enough memory.in one extreme case it also meant swapping the memory in one of my 36`s check your buffers (I should coco) and see if your getting any "misses" and also any "failures" if you are getting them on anything quite high (this can depend on how long the routers have been up to how many logged errors your getting) apart from your middle buffers (normal) you may be going in the right direction...me thinks HTH steve >From: "John Kale" >Reply-To: "John Kale" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Gre tunnel - ip and ipx packet loss -URGENT [7:8190] >Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:14:43 -0400 > >hi all, >We run a gre tunnel between sites across an isp network...sometimes we lose >connectivity (ipx mainly and somtimes both IP & IPX) but the show tunnel >and >show interface commands gives an up, up status. > >The only thing unusual is that the show int f0/0 commands reveals a rising >number of packets deferred. what does the ' deferred' signify and >can anybody pls come up with tips on making this tunnel a trouble free one. > >regards, > > >John >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8212&t=8212 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: passed switching test! [7:8207]
Why not celebrate your achievement? Treat your patient husband to the restaurant of your choice. Congratulations. > -Original Message- > From: Jennifer Cribbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: passed switching test! [7:8207] > > > I did it890 on my test and there was one question that I > didn't even > answer. It had two screens and was a fill in the > blank where I was supposed to write in domain name, ip > address and the vlan > numbers and name. I hit the wrong > button and went to the next question...darn... It was > relatively an easy > easy exam and only took me 20 minutes. > > My scores were: > > CGMP100% > Cisco Fundamentals 100% > Multicast100% > Multilayer Switching 83% > Spanning Tree 75% > Switching Interconnectivity 90% > Troubleshooting 100% > Trunking 75% > VLAN Operations 66% > > > My next test will be the routing one. But first I want to > figure out what > the heck falls under the catagory of vlan > operations. With no experience, I will be sadly lacking in > skills if I > don't know that. > > Thanks everyone for all the wonderful discussions. That and > tim boyes and > sybex and the cisco university helped me > achieve this. And my very very very patient husband. > > Jennifer Cribbs > > > Have a great day!! > Jennifer > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8213&t=8207 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cable modem connection and a Cisco Router [7:8208]
Juan, 12.1(2)T ios and higher will supports dhcp client. -Frank On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Juan Blanco wrote: > Team, > I have a cable modem connection, I want to be able to use my Cisco 1600 > router, does any ones know I could find some information of how doing this, > the problem > that I see I that every time I reboot my router a new ip will be provided > via DHCP...Is this possible, I have the impression that Cisco routers only > works with static ip. > > Thanks in advanced on taking your time to reply > > JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8215&t=8208 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Semi-RANT: extended exams [7:7871]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Kevin Wigle wrote: > and in that vein (curmudgeons and such .. :-)) > > How does anyone except you, know that you took an "extended" exam? By knowing where I took the test, which appears on the written test reports. (moby snip) -- "Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome." --Me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8216&t=7871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: passed switching test! [7:8207]
Congratulations Jennifer, I actually think I did the same thing on the same question. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ -Original Message- From: Jennifer Cribbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: passed switching test! [7:8207] I did it890 on my test and there was one question that I didn't even answer. It had two screens and was a fill in the blank where I was supposed to write in domain name, ip address and the vlan numbers and name. I hit the wrong button and went to the next question...darn... It was relatively an easy easy exam and only took me 20 minutes. My scores were: CGMP100% Cisco Fundamentals 100% Multicast100% Multilayer Switching 83% Spanning Tree 75% Switching Interconnectivity 90% Troubleshooting 100% Trunking 75% VLAN Operations 66% My next test will be the routing one. But first I want to figure out what the heck falls under the catagory of vlan operations. With no experience, I will be sadly lacking in skills if I don't know that. Thanks everyone for all the wonderful discussions. That and tim boyes and sybex and the cisco university helped me achieve this. And my very very very patient husband. Jennifer Cribbs Have a great day!! Jennifer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8214&t=8207 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frame-relay route question [7:8217]
When connecting cisco router ( as frame-relay switch) with frame relay device, I configured frame relay route as Serial 0Dlci in 16to Serial 1 Dlci out 26 Serial 1Dlci in 27to Serial 0 Dlci out 17 ( require only these 2 routes) But "show frame-relay pvc" shows both route status inactive and both route does not work. When I give additional two route ( not required ) Serial 1Dlci in 26to Serial 1 Dlci out 16 Serial 0Dlci in 17to Serial 0 Dlci out 27 then both route status become active and configuration works. Is it necessary that dlci path must be completed?Because sometime it is not required to complete path of dlci. Can anybody give me guidence on this topic ? -- ___ Get your free email from http://mymail.iname.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8217&t=8217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on VLAN configuration [7:8127]
Hello, My replies are in line. But you should include an ASCII topology to give us a better understanding of what you are trying to accomplish. >From: "Amit Gupta" >Reply-To: "Amit Gupta" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Help on VLAN configuration [7:8127] >Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:34:58 -0400 > >Hi All, > >The scenario is such that I have 2 subnets configured >on the LAN. They are x.x.1.0 / 24 and x.x.2.0 / 24. >The IP address for the Routers ethernet port are >x.x.1.1 and x.x.2.1. Similarly workstations in either >subnet point to these addresses ( x.x.1.1 and x.x.2.1 >) as their default gateways. How many routers will you have? one, two. With this two subnets in one router means you'll put them in two different interfaces. If you are going to put this in one ethernet interface, you'll not be able to trunk using ethernet interface. >I am having Cat 5509 and Cat 6609 ( With MSFC) with >all the ports in the default VLAN1 > >I have the following queries on this : >Config on MSFC > >Can the IP addresses of the vlan interfaces be any one >of the free IP address available on the LAN. >For eg x.x.1.3 Yes, you can but the better thing to do is to make the vlan interface be the default gateway for your PCs. For example: Cat5509 ISLCat6509 w/MSFC || | | || | | PC PC PC PC (V1) (V2) (V2) (V1) You'll have two vlan interfaces at the MSFC and the PC's in V1 will have their gateway point to vlan 1 interface of the MSFC and the PC's in V2 will have their gateway point to vlan 2 interface. >What will be the default gateway address configured on >MSFC in this case ? ( Will it point towards the >address of the Ethernet interface of the External >router ) Yes, it will point to the next hop router if that router have all the routes to anything that the MSFC does not know about. ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 > >On the Switches > >Can both switches be configured in the VTP Server mode >? Yes, both the switches can be in server mode but they have to be in the same vtp domain. >Do the trunk ports have to have an IP address ? Trunked ports betweeen the 5509 and 6509 are layer2 ports they do not have ip addresses. > >DHCP Server > >How would I have to define the scopes on the DHCP >server. >Suppose I plan to have 1 Vlan configured for 1 subnet >and 4 VLANs in the second subnet. How to go about it. You don't put a subnet in four diffrent vlans that' not the purpose of vlans. VLANs allow you to group ports on a switch to limit unicast, multicast, and broadcast traffic flooding. Flooded traffic originating from a particular VLAN is only flooded out other ports belonging to that VLAN. > >Thanks in advance for any kind of help/ suggestions > > > > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 >a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8218&t=8127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VIP capacity [7:8152]
This is more a discussion on bus loading. In a document from Networkers 2000 - "Cisco 7000 Family Hardware Configuration and Performance Optimization", Session 2805 the term IBBF, Interface Bus Bandwidth Factor is talked about. On page 90 of the powerpoint presentation, it lists the MC-E3 with an IBBF of 64 and the T3 with an IBBF of 113. This totals 177. The same page says that an IBBF of 500 is the load limit for a VIP2. For info, the 8T has an IBBF of 40 On the 7513 there are 2 cybus'. Each cybus can handle an IBBF of 1066. This takes in all the cards plugged into that particular cybus. So, the VIP2 can handle the two high speed PAs but you still might want to put one on the other cbus. However, if your router is that close to 1066, you have other problems. Just a fyi, to check how loaded your cbus is, give the command: show controller cbus utilization. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Hossam El-Ashkar" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 9:58 AM Subject: VIP capacity [7:8152] > Hello all, > I am having a router 7513 with vip2-40, and T3 , mc-E3, and 8T port > adapters I was wondering if it is better to put the T3, and the E3 on > the same VIP, or i would better put one high capacity port adapter with a > low capacity one (i.e. the 8T)?? > Thanks. > Regards, > - > Hossam El-Ashkar > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8219&t=8152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
That limitation sounds like the number of host in a class C address group. You know, 256 address minus the network address and the broadcast address. There is no limitation, but of courses common sense would tell you that the more workstation contending for the same resource would introduce many problems. But 300 is not too high. >From: "John Kale" >Reply-To: "John Kale" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] >Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:45:24 -0400 > >hi all, > >I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in a vlan. >I'm currently redesigning a network that would have a vlan containing about >300 devices. Is the 254 restriction a design one? Please can someone >enlighting me on this issue. > > >regards, > > >Tunde >_ >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8220&t=8128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wake on LAN [7:8221]
Hi, I've got a TR network and I am trying to to get wake on lan to work. It works when I connect workstation through a hub to the server that initializes wake on lan, however, when I connect workstation to the actual network it does not work. I've got a 4000 Cisco router and 8272 IBM TR Switch, is there any special configurations I need set up on the router or switch for the wake on lan to work. Alexander Khramov Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8221&t=8221 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
