Solutions for the Solie Labs - ?? [7:75239]
Hello,Does any one if there is a way to get the solutions for the Solie Labs from CCIE PS Vol. I?Thank you. Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75239t=75239 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Dialer-Watch driving me nuts!! [7:75107]
Hello,Can some help me figure out once and for all what this requirement means: Configure so that ONLY R5 places a call R5 is the remote router and R1 the hub router. This is what I thought I understood regarding the above requirement. Only configure the dialer map statement on the remote side NOT the hub side. I have verified this with Solie's examples on ISDN. This is correct but it just does not work!! Why??A dialer map statement is also needed on the hub side for it to respond to pings from the remote side. The moment I remove the dialer map statement on the hub side, pings start dropping. Can some one help me once and for all? The reason why I ask is: If this same requirement is asked in the Lab, points will be deducted if I use the dialer map statement in the hub side but then my goal would be to get points for working configs and this is the only way to get it to work!! Here goes: using dialer watch as a backup method.Hub side config:R1-TS#interface BRI0/0 ip address 133.10.30.1 255.255.255.0 no ip mroute-cache dialer map ip 133.10.30.5 broadcast 5553000 dialer-group 1 isdn spid1 055511 5551000 isdn spid2 055521 5552000 Remote side config:R5-RTD#ri b0/0 interface BRI0/0 description to R1-Hub rtr ip address 133.10.30.5 255.255.255.0 dialer map ip 133.10.1.0 broadcast 5551000 dialer map ip 133.10.10.0 broadcast 5551000 dialer map ip 133.10.30.1 broadcast 5551000 dialer watch-group 1 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 055531 5553000 isdn spid2 055541 5554000 access-list 101 deny ospf any any access-list 101 permit ip any any dialer watch-list 1 ip 133.10.1.0 255.255.255.224 dialer watch-list 1 ip 133.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 101 R1 is connected to R4 via Frame and R4 is connected to R5 via EthernetShut the F0/0 intf. on R5, Routes watched disappear, Dialer watch works it magic and now routes are learned via isdn:on R5:O 133.10.10.0/24 [110/1626] via 133.10.30.1, 00:00:04, BRI0/0 C 133.10.5.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0 O E2133.10.4.0/28 [110/20] via 133.10.30.1, 00:00:04, BRI0/0 O E2133.10.1.0/27 [110/20] via 133.10.30.1, 00:00:04, BRI0/0 C 133.10.30.0/24 is directly connected, BRI0/0 Initial pings work:R5-RTD#ping ip Target IP address: 133.10.1.1 Repeat count [5]: 500 Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 500, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 133.10.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! In the meantime, removed the dialer map statement on the hub side: Pings drop:R1-TS(config)#int b0/0 R1-TS(config-if)#no dialer map ip 133.10.30.5 broad 5553000 On R5:R5-RTD#ping 133.10.1.1Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 133.10.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) Add the dialer map statement back on R1: Pings start working again:R5-RTD#ping 133.10.1.1Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 133.10.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: . Success rate is 80 percent (4/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 32/32/32 ms Bring back the F0/0 intf. up again on R5: Routes now learned via Ethernet;R5-RTD#r 133.10.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 4 masks O 133.10.10.0/24 [110/74] via 133.10.40.4, 00:00:11, FastEthernet0/0 C 133.10.5.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0 O E2133.10.4.0/28 [110/20] via 133.10.40.4, 00:00:11, FastEthernet0/0 O E2133.10.1.0/27 [110/20] via 133.10.40.4, 00:00:11, FastEthernet0/0 Any ISDN experts?? I have tried it numerous times!! Same result. Was just expecting a different result? Now is this what the definition of insanity really means ;- Thank you.Sincerely,Nuts ;-) Express yourself with MSN Messenger 6.0 -- download now! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=75107t=75107 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
IPexpert versus fatkid labs [7:74939]
Which one is better? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74939t=74939 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: IP expert's RS workbook [7:74849]
If it is for a lower price... sure I would like to do it! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74935t=74849 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: CCNP Lab design and Topology [7:74389]
Do these lab companions have specific labs for study or does it only work off of the Network Academy books? Basically, what I am asking is if they can be used separately with my own home lab versus do I need to get the whole package of Network Academy companion book, lab book, and journal? (What is the journal used for anyways?) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74432t=74389 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Load Balancing; help explain [7:74376]
I was asked a question about load balancing on routers and servers. Ive looked it up on the websites but can someone give me their 2 cents about it? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74376t=74376 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Cisco CIM cds... are they really worth it? [7:74375]
I am thinking about buying some Cisco CIM cds... something like IP routing, Link-state, CCIE multiprotocol challenge, and ISDN access. Do you think it is worth it or should I just stick to plain old lab work? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74375t=74375 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Practice Lab [7:74300]
I dont know if my previous post got up there cuz I didnt see it on the replies but I first picked up 3 2503s and a 2912 switch. I think that is a good start. I picked up the 2503 versus 2501 bc I can, in the future, learn the ISDN topics when I buy an ISDN simulator. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74312t=74300 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Dumb Question [7:74315]
Here is another dumb question... what is the difference between Extreme network equipment and cisco equipment? I know that Cisco and Nortel... main diff is cli and menu driven. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74318t=74315 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: CCIE Written Reading List ? [7:74317]
All that I have seen is everyone saying Bruce Caslow, CCIE practical studies, Doyle Vol. 1, and Halabi. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74319t=74317 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: BSCI 640-901 [7:74056]
Can you please inform us of what did you download on the web regarding the IS-IS? I heard there was a sample chapter on IS-IS but is this what you are referring to? Please help, I am going for my BSCI now. I only have the Sybex book but I am looking for good labs for these. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74067t=74056 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: Trunking ISl and 802.1q [7:74059]
How much or how did you pick up a 3550? I thought they were so expensive? Please do tell... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74066t=74059 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: What cables need to be used for an AS2511-rj [7:73987]
Brian, All I can say is wow. That helps me out so much. I appreciate your time that you have given me and I hope someday I can help you out. Thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74037t=73987 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: What cables need to be used for an AS2511-rj [7:73987]
Thank you again for all the responses. Does anyone have a sample reverse telnet configuration I can attempt to apply on my router? Daniel, I realize that you man of mis-read what I typed but I was asking about an AS2511-RJ. The rj specifically means non octal cable but rj45 ports. And apparently the answer that I couldnt find is using a roll-over cable. Once again... thanx guys! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=74006t=73987 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516]
Here is what I think is the trick to understand Halabi: It is NOT for entry level people nor is it for people who use it as a study book for any exam. That is why the book is called Internet Routing Architectures not BGP cram session book for the CCXX exams..The word Architectures should mean something, right? I have found out that the book really makes sense after you work with BGP in your job on a day-to-day basis. Atleast, it did for me and now I have read it many times and still refer to it once in a while, when I try to help some customers with their BGP configs and issues. Initially, I found it hard to comprehend so I do feel other's pain :-( Yes, please do not be so harsh about any author. Where in the book does it say that it should be used a study guide for any exam, even the CCIE is NOT mentioned. So how can you be so harsh about it. It is indeed called the Bible for a reason. And same of his OSPF design guide. I have used Caslow, Stewart, Halabi, Doyle and Parkhurst and best of all Cisco's BGP case studies. They are all good books/materials and should be used accordingly. As I always tell people, BGP is NOT for the faint-hearted :-) And, yes, the BGP beta exam was one of the most difficult exams that I took but managed to get a 857. Peace. No flames please !! Just my 2 cents!! CN From: John Neiberger Reply-To: John Neiberger To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 01:59:34 GMT Hmm...that's interesting. I found Halabit to be very easy to understand, but that was after reading Stewart. Stewart's book is incredibly easy to understand, especially considering how short it is. Quite concise, yet readable. I have Doyle Vol. II but I stopped studying for attempt #2 before I got to the BGP section. I should read through it as a refresher and to compare it to Halabi. But Dre? Despise?? :-) That's pretty harsh! However, I guess I can understand your point. BGP can be pretty easy to understand when it's explained correctly, and can be very difficult to understand when explained poorly. John Pintens, Koen wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I agree with Dre I also got both books and Jeff Doyle's is so much easier to read and understand then Halabi's Koen Pinten Network Engineer CCNP CCDP MCSE MCSA MCDBA -Original Message- From: dre [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:55 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516] juniper wrote in message ... Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam I personally despise Halabi's authortative, the BGP-bible IRAbook. It is awful. It is the sole reason nobody understands BGP.It's confusing, boring, and downright awful to read and understandsuch simple concepts. I passed the Cisco BGP exam (took the beta), and I did not evenopen Halabi or Stewart (I do like Stewart, but for this exam, hisinformation is not really on-topic). Normally, I'd say read the RFC's, but they are also not going to help you on this exam. I useda) the outline provided by Ciscob) Jeff Doyle's TCP/IP Routing Volume II (first 318 pages) Jeff Doyle is the master of routing protocols...this misconceptionthat Volume II was not as good as Volume I reminds me of 14year old pimply-faced kids arguing about Star Wars vs. Empire or Matrix 1 vs. Matrix: Reloaded. These are all good movies... however, Star Wars: Episode I and II are more remniscient of HalabiIMO. -dre**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html ** This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not use, disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately by reply email and then delete the emails. Views expressed in this email may not be those of the Airways Corporation of New Zealand Limited ** **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73577t=73516 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73600t=73516
RE: What cables need to be used for an AS2511-rj [7:73987]
Just making sure... I have a whole bunch of light (baby) blue cables... are those the ones I need? I appreciate all of your responses... -ThaiKitty Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73997t=73987 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
CCDA (DESGN 640-861) ....... A BEAST ???? [7:73770]
Group, Have been reading a lot lately on this new CCDA exam here and on brainbuzz.com? Is it really a beast? Can any one concur? Most seemed to have failed the first time even though they had all the right materials/books? What is the reason? I myself need to take this exam before Sept.1st and kind of getting scared regarding this exam.!! Why should it be more difficult than the CID exam? The CID exam was pretty straighforward. Can Boson help here.?? Boson guarantees that you will pass the exam if you buy their exam?? Any one?? From: Fathalla Ahmed Reply-To: Fathalla Ahmed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184] Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 07:19:38 GMT Can you recall how many cases was in your exam? ( in my old exam, 2000, it was two cases). Regards, Fathalla -Original Message- From: Constantin Tivig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Fathalla Ahmed Subject: RE: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184] I just passed the exam and I didn't find any specific q on ipx, appletalk. Of course you should know the basics...right? C -Original Message- From: Fathalla Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184] Hi, Any body knows if IPX and AppleTalk are included in the new CCDA exam? Regards, ___ Fathalla A. Fathalla Technical Consultant The content of this communication is classified as Mobifon SA Romania Confidential and Proprietary Information.The content of this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication then delete it from your system. We appreciate your assistance in preserving the confidentiality of our correspondence. Thank you. Prezentul mesaj constituie o Informatie confidentiala si este proprietatea exclusiva a MobiFon S.A.. Mesajul se adreseaza numai persoanei fizice sau juridice mentionata ca destinatara, precum si altor persoane autorizate sa-l primeasca. In cazul in care nu sunteti destinatarul vizat, va aducem la cunostinta ca dezvaluirea, copierea, distribuirea sau initierea unor actiuni pe baza prezentei informatii sunt strict interzise si atrag raspunderea civila si penala. Daca ati primit acest mesaj dintr-o eroare, va rugam sa ne anuntati imediat, ca raspuns la mesajul de fata, si sa-l stergeti apoi din sistemul dvs. Apreciem si va multumim pentru sprijinul acordat in pastrarea confidentialitatii corespondentei noastre. GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73770t=73770 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
RE: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) ....... A BEAST ???? [7:73770]
Appreciate your feedback Willy.Thank you. Question: What do you mean when you say that you have given this course already a couple of times? Do you mean you are a Cisco trainer, a CCSP sort of? Any pointers that you can provide? NDA withstanding ofcourse!! This is the only certification left for me and the one I need to have my official CCDP cert. mailed to me and thus I have been searching the web for any useful info. pertaining to this exam? What are the type of questions, ex. a long case study for me to read first and then answer questions based on that case study? How many? Arcane questions on SAFE and IPV6?? What's the format like? Any specific topics that I need to dwell on? I am using the Cisco Press CCDA exam certification guide for the old exam as well as the new Sybex book by Lammle and Barkl (not very useful IMHO). Are there anything else like exams/notes that I can buy that would be helpful? Thank you. Sincerely, CN From: Willy Schoots To: 'Cisco Nuts' Subject: RE: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) ... A BEAST [7:73770] Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 15:29:55 +0200 One of the reasons is that there is very little material available that covers this new exam. A lot of the stuff is still for the old one. Combined with the fact that the course changed about 85% from the old version you might understand why some people fail the test. Having given this course already a couple of times I can say that its difficulty is in the broad range of subjects that it covers. Anything from routing, switching, IPv6, content networking, voice and so on can appear on the exam. Some of the topics will be very new to typical CCDA candidates (only CCNA level knowledge). It also focuses on the design model used in CISCO SAFE architecture. I feel the course and the exam are a big step forward compared to the old DCN and CID exams. Welcome to the 21st century ;-) Cheers, Willy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: zaterdag 9 augustus 2003 14:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) ... A BEAST [7:73770] Group, Have been reading a lot lately on this new CCDA exam here and on brainbuzz.com? Is it really a beast? Can any one concur? Most seemed to have failed the first time even though they had all the right materials/books? What is the reason? I myself need to take this exam before Sept.1st and kind of getting scared regarding this exam.!! Why should it be more difficult than the CID exam? The CID exam was pretty straighforward. Can Boson help here.?? Boson guarantees that you will pass the exam if you buy their exam?? Any one?? From: Fathalla Ahmed Reply-To: Fathalla Ahmed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184] Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 07:19:38 GMT Can you recall how many cases was in your exam? ( in my old exam, 2000, it was two cases). Regards, Fathalla -Original Message- From: Constantin Tivig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Fathalla Ahmed Subject: RE: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184] I just passed the exam and I didn't find any specific q on ipx, appletalk. Of course you should know the basics...right? C -Original Message- From: Fathalla Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDA (DESGN 640-861) [7:73184] Hi, Any body knows if IPX and AppleTalk are included in the new CCDA exam? Regards, ___ Fathalla A. Fathalla Technical Consultant The content of this communication is classified as Mobifon SA Romania Confidential and Proprietary Information.The content of this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication then delete it from your system. We appreciate your assistance in preserving the confidentiality of our correspondence. Thank you. Prezentul mesaj constituie o Informatie confidentiala si este proprietatea exclusiva a MobiFon S.A.. Mesajul se adreseaza numai persoanei fizice sau juridice mentionata ca destinatara, precum si altor persoane autorizate sa-l primeasca. In cazul in care nu sunteti destinatarul vizat, va aducem la cunostinta ca dezvaluirea, copierea, distribuirea sau initierea unor actiuni pe baza prezentei informatii sunt strict interzise si atrag raspunderea civila si penala. Daca ati primit acest mesaj dintr-o eroare, va rugam sa ne anuntati imediat, ca raspuns la mesajul de fata, si sa-l stergeti apoi din sistemul dvs. Apreciem si va multumim pentru sprijinul
642-801 [7:73509]
Hi all, I am taking the new BSCI test next monday, if anyone has taken it I am looking for some suggestions to know what is heavily covered on the exam. Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73509t=73509 -- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
12.3T Not for 2500 and 2600 ? [7:73249]
Anyone see any anouncement on 12.3 being last relase of IOS for 2500 and 2600 routers. The new T line does not have any images for anything other than the XM series of the 2600 and the 2691. I guess this partly because they repackaged all the images and smallest thing they have is called IPBASE which uses 64M ram and 16m flash. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73249t=73249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 640-861 CCDA [7:72217]
Hello, Sorry, I myself did not catch it earlier. And I don't have a login name and password. Can you post Priscilla's thoughts on this new exam. Thank you. Sincerely, From: Maximus Reply-To: Maximus To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 640-861 CCDA [7:72217] Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:42:41 GMT Did you catch the following comments compliments of Priscilla: ~watch the wrap~ http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72415t=72380 PacketEXPERTS wrote: I am looking to test next month (CCDA 640-861). I am looking for any and all books, tips and info to help test next month. Thanks = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Please send replys to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = - Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72663t=72217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Revisited - Is the CCIE Written a valid certification? [7:72664]
Funny, Cisco would do something like that. :-) I would expect to see something like the CCIP which has been on for over 2 years now or the CCSP but CCIE written..Well, we all know that this is NOT a certification!! Anyways From: Daniel Cotts Reply-To: Daniel Cotts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Revisited - Is the CCIE Written a valid certification? [7:72611] Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 01:23:13 GMT Cisco Training Seminars have used that format for years.-Original Message- From: Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Revisited - Is the CCIE Written a valid certification? [7:72609] Well, apparently Cisco now thinks so. I was registering for one of Cisco's Webinars, and ran across this question: Please check your Attendee Certification Level (Check all that apply) CCDA CCDP CCNA CCNP CCIE Written CCIE Lab Let's see how long this thread misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72664t=72664 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Topics covered for the CID 640-025 exam?? [7:72479]
Thanks so much for the info. It's amazing what Cisco says will be valid topics for the exam and what exactly comes in the real exam!! I wonder why Cisco does not even mention the topics in their web-site. So I gather that IPX, AT, Windows, X.25 will be covered in the exam? From: tu do Reply-To: tu do To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Topics covered for the CID 640-025 exam?? [7:72479] Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 19:10:23 GMT Hi Cisco Nuts, IPX AppleTalk Windows Networking SNA X.25 Stratacom Switches The topics I didn't see in Exam (12/2002)were SNA and Stratacom Switches. Regards, misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72615t=72479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Topics covered for the CID 640-025 exam?? [7:72479]
Chuck, Thanks for the useful info. Question for you: Why does Cisco does this? Is it just to screw us, seriously? :- If you have checked out Cisco's web site for the CCDP exam topics, IPX, AT, Windows Networking, X.25, SNA and Stratacom switches are NOT mentioned at all. But someone else who took the same exam on 12/2002 just pointed out that everything else but SNA and Stratacom switches were covered on the exam. I wonder if Cisco just published a new exam topics on their web-site. They do mention HSRP, IRB, Spanning-Tree, Vlans, BPDU's etc. etc which I don't see being covered in the CID book.?? I am confused!! All I am using in the CID book by M. Birkerner. I wonder if this will suffice. Sincerely. From: Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter Reply-To: Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Topics covered for the CID 640-025 exam?? [7:72479] Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:48:30 GMT if it's any help, the CCDP recert exam pretty much followed right along the published exam topics. I don't recall being surprised by anything I saw. As for the CID itself, I took the 3.0 exam several years ago and the only real gripe I had about it was the stratecom stuff, which was not included in the course materials. It took me two tries to pass, but mainly because I didn't treat the LAN protocols seriously the first time through. If recent experience is worth anything, the published exam topics are probably the best place to start. For both my CCNP and CCDP recerts, I found that a couple of years of reading and hands on as part of CCIE Lab prep were all that was necessary ;- Cisco Nuts wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Sorry, If this is another request but Are any of the following topics covered under the CID 640-025 exam? The exam is still valid for upto 45 days after July 25th, I think? IPX AppleTalk Windows Networking SNA X.25 Stratacom Switches These topics are not listed under: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exams/640-025.html Anyone? Thank you. Sincerely. _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72616t=72479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Topics covered for the CID 640-025 exam?? [7:72479]
Well, thank you.someone finally responded!! :-) I will definitely go over the Windows networking part but how about those other topics that I mentioned.Are they going to be asked at all? I do not see these topics listed under the exam topics on CCO. When did you take your exam? Things might have changed but I am not sure. Please advise. Thank you. CN From: Mwalie W Reply-To: Mwalie W To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Topics covered for the CID 640-025 exam?? [7:72479] Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 08:37:03 GMT Dear Cisco Nuts, Okay, they will ask some questions on desktop networking: broadcasts and that kind of stuff. I think you have to read that chapter in the CID book (Windows Networking). Otherwise, you should be fine with Cisco Internetwork Design (CID) course book: know it inside out because everything is there, and it can confuse if not covered thoroughly. I did it twice, but should have done it once actually. Good weekend. Mwalie misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72583t=72479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Topics covered for the CID 640-025 exam?? [7:72479]
Hello, Sorry, If this is another request but Are any of the following topics covered under the CID 640-025 exam? The exam is still valid for upto 45 days after July 25th, I think? IPX AppleTalk Windows Networking SNA X.25 Stratacom Switches These topics are not listed under: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exams/640-025.html Anyone? Thank you. Sincerely. _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72479t=72479 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID 640-025 - ?? [7:72205]
Hello,Getting ready to take the 640-025 CID exam. Using Matthew H. Birkner's CID book from Cisco Press. Going over the topics covered in the exam @http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exams/640-025.htmlI noticed that there was NO mention of IPX, AppleTalk, Windows Networking and SNA Design at all? Why?Does this mean that these topics will NOT be tested on the exam even though the book has devoted chapters to these same topics?Please advise.Also, any tips regarding taking this exam is very well appreciated. I mean, are there any scenario type long questions with diagrams etc. asked or is it just like any other regular exam with multiple choice questions - just click a, b, c, d or e ?Thank you.Sincerely. Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72205t=72205 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame Relay over IP [7:70927]
I am tryin to use Frame relay switching over IP. Not IP over frame relay. If we can do that we can connect two sites that are connected over IP from L2 point of view. Frame Relay Frame Relay over IP is not yet readily available. The draft IETF specification was produced in March 2001. This has not left much time for industry take-up. Frame Relay over IP would probably appeal only to the carrier market in any case. Carriers may embrace this to reduce their frame relay network costs. It is unlikely to find widespread deployment at all, although it may see limited use towards the end of this year. It should hold little attraction for enterprise companies- where is the benefit of adding another layer of complexity when they can engineer and migrate to an IP VPN instead? Best regards, Pedro Cabarga wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] May I ask you what r u tryng to do? Cisco Breaker wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, Anybody used Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE Tunnel with Cisco routers? We are searching for a solution to deploy Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE tunnel. Any help will be appreciated. Best regards, Cisco Breaker Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70955t=70927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wireless field engineer practice test? [7:71011]
I am looking for practice tests on the web but can't seem find any. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71011t=71011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any accredited Cisco learning places in the NVA area? [7:70921]
Hello,Does any one know of any accredited Cisco learning places in the NVA area? My company will pay for Cisco cert. programs if obtained from an accredited institution.How about Netmaster or Learning Tree or Global Knowledge? Any of these?How about Strayer or even Stratford Univ.?Any help is appreciated.Thank you. Here is my company's policy: CISCO CERTIFICATIONS... With regards to Cisco certification reimbursements through the educational assistance program: * Cisco certifications must be through an accredited institution that is accredited through the CHEA, Council of Higher Educational Accreditation, MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70921t=70921 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay over IP [7:70927]
Hi all, Anybody used Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE Tunnel with Cisco routers? We are searching for a solution to deploy Frame relay over IP without using MPLS or GRE tunnel. Any help will be appreciated. Best regards, Cisco Breaker Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70927t=70927 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slightly OT but help needed nevertheless in HyperT [7:70714]
Priscilla, I just upgraded to HTPE 6.3 and it did the trick? Thanks to the Road Goes on Forever for this. www.hilgraeve.com From: Scott Nelson Reply-To: Scott Nelson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Slightly OT but help needed nevertheless in HyperT [7:70672] Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 16:02:56 GMT I use Teraterm for my Windowz machines. It's free. http://www.ayera.com/teraterm/ Even does SSH Ver 2. IMHO, a *lot* better than Hypertem. OT: I wonder if Cisco has plans to implement SSH ver 2 client on IOS. Scotty Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] After tinkering with every single option in HyperTerminal on Windows XP and Windows 2000, I have given up on the up arrow. :-) I just use Ctrl-P which seems to work correctly. Of course, another option is different software. SecureCRT is great. I hope someone else has better advice, but to be honest, I think HyperTerminal on newer Windows versions is simply broken in minor ways and there is no better answer!?! Priscilla Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello,Any Windows expert in this group know how I can use my UP Arrow keyon my XP laptop to repeat my previous commands using HyperTerminal?Neverhad a problem in Win95 or NT but on XP when I use my Up Arrowkey, itspits out the output of the cmd. right away and lands a @ signat theprompt.Then, I have to use Ctrl-P keys.Thank you.Sincerely.Here isan example using the UP Arrow key: Core#sh ints0/0^@Serial0/0 is up, line protocol isupHardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.252MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,reliability 255/255, txload 251/255, rxload 251/255Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not setKeepalive set (10 sec)LMI enq sent 93, LMI stat recvd 93, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI upLMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTEFR SVC disabled, LAPF state downBroadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 34/0, interfacebroadcasts34Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang neverLast clearing of show interface counters 00:15:29Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total outputdrops: 0Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/3/16 (active/max active/max total)Reserved Conversations 1/1 (allocated/max allocated)Available Bandwidth 5 kilobits/sec30 second input rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/sec 30 second output rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/secCore#^@ Core# MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Protect your PC - Click here for McAfee.com VirusScan Online Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70714t=70714 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Slightly OT but help needed nevertheless in HyperTerminal!! [7:70651]
Hello,Any Windows expert in this group know how I can use my UP Arrow key on my XP laptop to repeat my previous commands using HyperTerminal?Never had a problem in Win95 or NT but on XP when I use my Up Arrow key, it spits out the output of the cmd. right away and lands a @ sign at the prompt.Then, I have to use Ctrl-P keys.Thank you.Sincerely. Here is an example using the UP Arrow key: Core#sh int s0/0^@ Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial Internet address is 10.2.1.1 255.255.255.252 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 251/255, rxload 251/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 93, LMI stat recvd 93, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 1023 LMI type is CISCO frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 34/0, interface broadcasts 34 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:15:29 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/3/16 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 1/1 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 5 kilobits/sec 30 second input rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/sec 30 second output rate 63000 bits/sec, 24 packets/secCore#^@ Core# MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70651t=70651 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Help! [7:70618]
Think of AS's as countries (not the best analogy but...) If you need to get to the UK from Japan thru the US, then the route would be from Japan USUK, right? Now once you land in the US, say in LA, then the US will decide how you will make it to the UK through the US. For ex. US might want you to fly straight to NY and then to London or US might want to first fly to Detroit, then NY and then London or some other way. Thus, AS1 (Japan) knows only of getting to the UK thru the US but cannot dictate how that traffic will get routed thru the US to reach the UK. A little clearer?? ;- From: Mwalie W Reply-To: Mwalie W To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Help! [7:70618] Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:05:42 GMT Hi, I have come across that Cisco statement before: I guess it means that one AS does not influence the routing policies of another AS :) In other words (hoping I am right), AS1 implements its own internal routing policy, as will AS2 and AS1 will not dictate to AS2 how AS2 should route AS1's traffic through AS2. Honestly, I wish I could get clearer explanation from the members :) _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70634t=70618 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
custom-queueing----policy-based config?? [7:70064]
Hello, Is it possible to convert a custom queueing example into a policy-map config? I have: #queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 #queue-list 1 protocol ipx 2 #queue-list 1 protocol appletalk 3 #queue-list 1 protocol decnet 4 #queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 4000 limit 100 #queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 3000 limit 90 #queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 2000 limit 80 #queue-list 1 queue 4 byte-count 1000 limit 70 I have it configured as: #class-map class1 #match prot ip #class-map class2 #match prot ipx #class-map class3 #match prot apple #class-map class4 #match prot decnet #exit #policy-map policy1 class class1 bandwidth 4000 queue-limit 100 class class2 bandwidth 3000 queue-limit 90 class class3 bandwidth 2000 queue-limit 80 class class4 bandwidth 1000 queue-limit 70 Is this correct? Any advice/help is gratefully appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70064t=70064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco's BGP Course is Okay [7:70038]
Need to get your PHD first, right?? ;- before you can start doing your presentations!! The papers that they write usually are very simple because they break it down for you...so dummies like me can become real good at it!! But how about actually developing BGP itself, maybe BGP ver. 5 with more attributes and refinements.Maybe this might come after a Masters in Maths and a PHd...perhaps :- Just ask Tony Li!! From: Mwalie W Reply-To: Mwalie W To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco's BGP Course is Okay [7:70038] Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 03:36:36 GMT Hi All, This is just a comment arising after I read a paper in the current IEEE Communications Magazine. I was a little surprised. The paper is, of course, a refereed paper and was written by three guys, one of them a PhD. I was surprised because I could write the same paper just from the knowledge I gained on BGP through self-study. I understood the paper in its entirety without any struggle at all. So, my main point is that we can get good knowledge through Cisco Certifications, knowledge which can even help us attend conferences and present very decent papers. Good Luck. Mwalie _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=70065t=70038 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless Spec. question [7:69842]
Do you mean cisco interface when talking about the KIT? Any questions on the cli? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69883t=69842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Beta Exam - Thorough! [7:69644]
Glad to help !! Hope it was worth it towards your BGP learning process and towards your CCIP!! Based on the many Cisco exams that I have taken, BGP was the most extensive and thorough exam (becoz' it is a beta) but it does really test your knowledge on it, right? And the second most difficult after Qos/Mcast exam Good Luck towards your CCIP path.MPLS is not that bad though!! Sincerely, CN From: Mwalie W Reply-To: Mwalie W To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Beta Exam - Thorough! [7:69644] Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 06:49:49 GMT Hi All, Today, I did BGP Beta towards CCIP. A very thorough exam, with some bugs and grammatical mistakes here and there. It is so thorough and long that if you are not well prepared, you will pass with difficulty. No time to thinkeven a faster reader like me had problems. The first question took me about 10 minutes (should take about 1.5 minutes). From then on, I knew that I was always going to struggle. It is a nice exam to prepare for, full of diagrams and configurations! We need such kind of exams for certifying competent professionals. If I do not pass, I will gladly have the same experience again. Very nice intellectual challenge, I thought! To Cisco Nuts, Thanks for the hints!! I appreciate that so much. Good misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69814t=69644 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wireless Spec. question [7:69842]
I am currently studying for my wireless specialization, wondering if anyone has taken the new test for Feild engineers, and which of the three major topics is covered the most on the test. I have a great grasp on the AP configuration,fundamentals. But I have no access to any bridges? Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69842t=69842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A career in MPLS..... [7:66609]
Thank you so much for your enlightening reply!! And thank God I moved away from Novell to MS to Citrix and finally Cisco and now onto MPLS...And thank God it is a very specialized and small market right now that is looking for MPLS experienceAll the more better to develop skills in MPLS as every Tom, Dick and Harry is either just routing or switching ;- ) Looks like MPLS is the way to go!!! Come'on Sprint.Let's get on with the Show :-) From: Reply-To: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A career in MPLS. [7:66609] Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 04:47:44 GMT Ah - MPLS. Yes there are several large carriers with MPLS deployed or in the process of deploying it (equant, global crossing...). Some on their core and some on their layer 2 networks such as ATM (ATT for example). Others backed away from it but are now looking at it since it's a huge marketing beast that can't be ignored (Sprint for example). Aside from ISP's some large enterprises are using it for things like MPLS enabled VPN's. As to the market for someone that knows MPLS - what I have seen is it's a very specialized and small market right now that is looking for MPLS experience. Mostly due to it still being relatively new in deployments and being relatively small in the number of deployments. I do believe however after saying that - that it never hurts to have a wide background of skills. Imagine if you specialized in Novell and never moved into other areas for example. Novell is a great product but the market for Novell pro's dried up a lot from the good ole days. You would be much less marketable if you didn't also know other things such as Microsoft or Routing or ... I could go into my opinions of the pros and cons of MPLS and where I think it fits - but that's another boring story for later :) www.ccie4u.comOn 1 Apr 2003 at 15:47, nrf wrote:Cisco Nuts wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Hello group, How does one feel about a career in MPLS...I mean doing MPLSas part of your core job day in and out.Is it worth it? Since ournetwork does not use MPLS (maybe never will) inspite of being one of the Big Four Tier 1 SP's Let me guess. Do you work for Sprint? are there other SP's that use MPLS in theirbackbone?? Yeah, there are some. I have just given myself a month or so break from my CCIE LabPrep.(yeah!yeah! most would consider me stupid on this) to study MPLSfor the CCIP and am thinking if I should pursue this subject just like Idid for BGP.know it inside out cold.and maybe consider a newcareer/job in MPLS (obviously along with BGP, MBGP, MCast etc...) Doesanyone know of how MPLS is viewed out there? I mean, in terms ofimplementation, popularity and last but not the least , $$$ ??? ;-Whichof the Big SP's or Enterprise networks have implemented MPLS? Has it been worth the advantages that MPLS proposes??Thank you.Sincerely,CN The way I see it is this. MPLS is potentially powerful technology for it can be used as a lingua-franca among a carrier's network and transport layer and also as a way to impose circuit-switching discipline upon IP and therefore offer circuit-switching services with a pure IP network. But MPLS is by no means a slam-dunk. Certain carriers, most notably Sprint, have elected not to go down the MPLS path because they believe the technology is immature (and they are correct) and also because they believe that they can garner the benefits of MPLS by other means (also correct). The point is that while MPLS offers great potential, it also presents problems, so implementing it is not a no-brainer. And furthermore, I don't particularly like the way that Cisco is pushing MPLS, particularly in its cert program. In my opinion, I think Cisco's cert programs emphasize the least useful parts of MPLS while neglecting the more useful parts. For example, I don't understand why Cisco pushes LDP the way it does, for LDP merely builds LSP's that correspond to the route table, but what's so useful about having LDP's that look like the route table? It is far more useful to build LSP's that differ from the route table, but the methods of doing that are not really covered very much (if at all) in the Cisco curricula. Also, I don't understand why Cisco places such an emphasis on L3VPN's, as if L3VPNs were the only important service that MPLS enables. L3VPN's are only one of the new services that you can enable, and in my opinion, one of the less important ones. Far more important are the L2VPN capabilities and the ability to unify IP, ATM, and optical into a single management plane. The point I'm making is that if you merely study MPLS according to the Cisco curricula, you really haven't learned much about it that's actually useful. Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE
Re: A career in MPLS..... [7:66609]
Oh! Boy!! What have I got myself into??? Sorry guys, I had NO intention at all to start any kind of flame which I have literally despised in the past I have been frequenting this groupstudy since 1998 and have learn a LOT!! And really advanced my career and ;- Thank you for people like nrf who have always been there to answer and advise young newbies like us in this field Thank you nrf... So guys, let's refrain from turning this discussion into a 'flame' and get on with our quest for greater knowledge and skills!! Just wish that old-timers like Pamela and Laura were still around with us in this group!! Thank God for Priscilla, she is still there with us along with Howard and Chuck !! Thank you all. Sorry for anything that I might have invoked!! PEACE From: nrf Reply-To: nrf To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A career in MPLS. [7:66609] Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:38:58 GMT Henry D. wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Let me say up front, I don't have much experience in MPLS, I have only played with it in the lab and not all that extensively either. But CN is simply trying to get an idea of what to expect to go that road. I believe that was precisely what I answered.Is nrf saying not to advance in this field by studying Cisco's way of emphasising MPLS ? What I said is that if you want to advance in that field, you will need substantially more than what Cisco wants you to know about it. Read my post again. You know, we all have our doubts, he's brave enough to come to this group and ask questions. As far as L3VPN's, why not concentrate on that at least to start with. I never said not to learn L3VPN's. Read my post again. What I said is that study of L3VPN's shouldn't be emphasized to the degree that Cisco seems to emphasize it. It's still one reason to do the MPLS thing. By just doing that he'll need to touch on many aspects of MPLS anyway. He will still use either LDP or RSVP, he still will use the LSP establishment, he might as well learn the TE options available for establishment of those LSP's. He'll need to learn how to use the LSP's for pushing traffic over them. He'll learn what and how the labels get pushed/popped. Then why not study it that way. He's not advancing his MPLS skills, he might not have any yet. He's simply trying to see if he will be able to utilize any of the skills he will have to learn to make it worth it his while. No doubt all learning is good. Again, read my post again. I never said that he shouldn't learn it. What I said is that he shouldn't necessarily learn it the Cisco way. Well, maybe someone else with more experience in MPLS arena and someone more objective can give a better insight as to whether there is a demand for these skills. Are you implying that I'm not objective - that I have some kind of agenda? nrf wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cisco Nuts wrote in messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello group, How does one feel about a career in MPLS...I mean doing MPLS as part of your core job day in and out.Is it worth it? Since our network does not use MPLS (maybe never will) inspite of being one of the Big Four Tier 1 SP's Let me guess. Do you work for Sprint? are there other SP's that use MPLS in their backbone?? Yeah, there are some. I have just given myself a month or so break from my CCIE Lab Prep.(yeah!yeah! most would consider me stupid on this) to study MPLS for the CCIP and am thinking if I should pursue this subject just like I did for BGP.know it inside out cold.and maybe consider a new career/job in MPLS (obviously along with BGP, MBGP, MCast etc...) Does anyone know of how MPLS is viewed out there? I mean, in terms of implementation, popularity and last but not the least , $$$ ??? ;-Which of the Big SP's or Enterprise networks have implemented MPLS? Has it been worth the advantages that MPLS proposes??Thank you.Sincerely,CN The way I see it is this. MPLS is potentially powerful technology for itcan be used as a lingua-franca among a carrier's network and transport layerand also as a way to impose circuit-switching discipline upon IP and therefore offer circuit-switching services with a pure IP network. But MPLS is by no means a slam-dunk. Certain carriers, most notably Sprint, have elected not to go down the MPLS path because they believe thetechnology is immature (and they are correct) and also because they believethat they can garner the benefits of MPLS by other means (also correct).The point is that while MPLS offers great potential, it also presentsproblems, so implementing it is not a no-brainer. And furthermore, I don't particularly like the way that Cisco is pushingMPLS, particularly in its cert program. In my opinion, I think Cisco's
Re: ISIS Van Oene [7:66572]
Yup!!! Hats off to Peter..He has really done an excellent job with Isis.I really understood redistribution to and from Isis with other protocols based on his paper.It sure was worth the 3 month subscription. Some other papers are also very goodlike Chuck's 3550 guide and the isdn guide by Wolsefer ;- From: John Neiberger Reply-To: John Neiberger To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISIS Van Oene [7:66572] Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:05:35 GMT richard dumoulin wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Guys, After some lectures related to ISIS (Doyle, Caslow ect...), I am now assimilating the stuff by reading the two parts CertZone papers rewritten by Peter VanOene. As I am enjoying the reading, a strange thing is happening to me. The guides are very good, and now that I understand ISIS I am starting to love this routing protocol !! That's the first time it happens to me. Before, I just liked EIGRP because of its configuration simplicity but ISIS seems much more scalable, flexible etc... and exactly here is where its beauty resides. I can even say that it is helping me in understanding OSPF much more because of the comparisons. I never thought I could say such things about a routing protocol. Just wanted to write my thoughts. Thanks Peter !! note: and forgive my english. If it's any consolation, I had the same reaction to ISIS after I had studied it for a while. It's pretty cool, I must say. Its major downfall is that troubleshooting in ISIS can be more difficult because the output of many of the commands is misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66608t=66572 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A career in MPLS..... [7:66609]
Hello group, How does one feel about a career in MPLS...I mean doing MPLS as part of your core job day in and out.Is it worth it? Since our network does not use MPLS (maybe never will) inspite of being one of the Big Four Tier 1 SP'sare there other SP's that use MPLS in their backbone?? I have just given myself a month or so break from my CCIE Lab Prep.(yeah!yeah! most would consider me stupid on this) to study MPLS for the CCIP and am thinking if I should pursue this subject just like I did for BGP.know it inside out cold.and maybe consider a new career/job in MPLS (obviously along with BGP, MBGP, MCast etc...) Does anyone know of how MPLS is viewed out there? I mean, in terms of implementation, popularity and last but not the least , $$$ ??? ;-Which of the Big SP's or Enterprise networks have implemented MPLS? Has it been worth the advantages that MPLS proposes??Thank you.Sincerely,CN Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66609t=66609 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP exam in prep. for the CCIE Lab!! [7:66432]
Hello,The new BGP exam(beta) for the CCIP exam is a great one (imho) in prep. for the actual CCIE Lab.It really tests your skill and deep understanding of your BGP knowledge..133 questions in 250 minutes (slightly less than 2 minutes per question), which I think was not enough.Diagrams after diagrams.The testing site refused to give me just plain white sheets of paper and also refused for me to take my color pens, even my normal pens!!.. So it was a real 'drag' trying to draw diagrams in the provided plastic sheets as it smudges and no place to write but on my knees!!. Reminded me so much of that 'dreaded place' that many us have been or will be soon ;- since I had the similiar experience there!!!Uuh!! how my wrists hurt since they are hanging on the edge of that stupid desk!! I have taken over 30 exams in my professional career starting with the CNA/CNE 3 way back in 1995 with no problem in acquiring generous sheets of white paper and plenty of space to write...But this one??Anyways, the results are going to be mailed in a couple of weeks. Just prep'd. for a week since someone last week posted this new exam info. on this site...And as Monday the 31st was the last day, I decided to take it on Friday (lest I failed and could retake it on Monday again!!) But since I am going to know the results in a couple of weeks, I might just chill for now and pray I passedhopefully I did ;-Anyone else who has taken the exam, any feedback?Sincerely,CN The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66432t=66432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP exam in prep. for the CCIE Lab!! [7:66432]
Willy. Wow!! you teach the BGP and MPLS courses!! Where??? Awesome!! I've just begun my MPLS study which will be the last exam for the CCIP...Then I am going to head back to study for the CCIE Lab which I will take once Mr. Solie comes out with his PSV II .. When Mr. Solie ?? :-) I have 2 study guides from Cisco for the MPLS: one that says MPLS Concepts and the other that says MPLS/VPNDo I need to study both of these for the MPLS exam or just the first one will suffice? If both, then do I need any additional books from Cisco Press to supplement what I have? Like Advanced VPN by Allwyn or MPLS Traffic Engineering book?? Thank you for your help. Sincerely, CN From: Willy Schoots To: 'Cisco Nuts' Subject: RE: BGP exam in prep. for the CCIE Lab!! [7:66432] Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:03:12 +0100 Hi CN, I took the beta exam some while back (begin of February). I found it a relatively easy exam for someone that has followed the course (CBCR / BGP 3.0). The reason that I found it easy is because there are no questions not covered in the course and also not too many strange/unclear questions. I agree with you that it had a lot of questions with diagrams and that therefore the time was a constraint. Cheers, Willy Schoots PS: My judgment may colored by the fact that I teach this course and that it is one of my favorite courses to teach (together with the MPLS course). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cisco Nuts Sent: zaterdag 29 maart 2003 14:58 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP exam in prep. for the CCIE Lab!! [7:66432] Hello,The new BGP exam(beta) for the CCIP exam is a great one (imho) in prep. for the actual CCIE Lab.It really tests your skill and deep understanding of your BGP knowledge..133 questions in 250 minutes (slightly less than 2 minutes per question), which I think was not enough.Diagrams after diagrams.The testing site refused to give me just plain white sheets of paper and also refused for me to take my color pens, even my normal pens!!.. So it was a real 'drag' trying to draw diagrams in the provided plastic sheets as it smudges and no place to write but on my knees!!. Reminded me so much of that 'dreaded place' that many us have been or will be soon ;- since I had the similiar experience there!!!Uuh!! how my wrists hurt since they are hanging on the edge of that stupid desk!! I have taken over 30 exams in my professional career starting with the CNA/CNE 3 way back in 1995 with no problem in acquiring generous sheets of white paper and plenty of space to write...But this one??Anyways, the results are going to be mailed in a couple of weeks. Just prep'd. for a week since someone last week posted this new exam info. on this site...And as Monday the 31st was the last day, I decided to take it on Friday (lest I failed and could retake it on Monday again!!) But since I am going to know the results in a couple of weeks, I might just chill for now and pray I passedhopefully I did ;-Anyone else who has taken the exam, any feedback?Sincerely,CN The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66452t=66432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP default-originate crashes the router everytime - Why?? [7:66322]
I have 12.2.1 Enterprise Plus.I looked at the Bug info. on CCO and this one is not listedMaybe Cisco was still not out with this ver. at that time My ver: flash:c2500-jk8os-l.122-1.bin Looks like then 12.2.12a Enterprise is what I need!! Thank you. From: The Long and Winding Road Reply-To: The Long and Winding Road To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP default-originate crashes the router everytime - Why?? [7:66274] Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:47:25 GMT Cisco Nuts wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Everytime, I configure #nei a.b.c.d default-originate on my routers, it crashes the router. I have tried this on different routers and it's the same result every time. Is this a problem on 25xx's series? My routers have 16Flash and 16Dram. Anyone with a similar experience? this is a known bug with several versions of IOS 12.1. the answer is to upgrade - or never issue the command 12.1.5Tx seems to be stable. 12.2.12a seems to be OK when I ran into this a year or so ago I had to upgrade from 12.1.2 to something like 12.1.10. As I said - the T train seems to be stable also. Thank you. Sincerely, CN Excerpt from my router: AS1239-A(config-router)#nei 180.80.10.1 default-originate AS1239-A(config-router)# === Flushing messages (21:04:23 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993) === Buffered messages: 00:00:12: %SYS-7-NV_BLOCK_INIT: Initalized the geometry of nvram 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:00:15: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:15: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:01:54: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:01:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:02:01: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to administratively down 00:02:02: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:02:02: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console 00:02:50: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JK8OS-L), Version 12.2(1), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Apr-01 15:20 by cmong 00:03:10: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up 01:20:21: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 01:50:45: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:09:35: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:12:12: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 160.60.10.1 Up 19:30:06: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:52:26: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:02:48: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:11:47: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:35:37: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:44:02: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Down Interface flap 20:44:02: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:44:04: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down 20:44:05: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 20:49:20: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:49:21: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 20:49:22: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 20:49:30: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up 21:00:44: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Down Interface flap 21:00:45: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 21:00:46: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down 21:00:47: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 21:01:19: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 21:01:21: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 21:01:22: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 21:01:47: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up Queued messages: Exception: Illegal Instruction at 0x0 (PC) System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1995 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory F3: 15343148+1154396+1180856 at 0x360 Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013
Re: CCIE Practice Labs - Redustribution Strategies [7:66306]
Awesome!! ChuckThis should go down as one of the best redistribution attack strategy for the Lab.Are you going to post in on your web-site?? Many like me can learn from this.. From: The Long and Winding Road Reply-To: The Long and Winding Road To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Practice Labs - Redustribution Strategies [7:66306] Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 04:45:47 GMT For the past couple of weeks I've been whacking out various CCIE practice labs. I've also been suffering various degrees of euphoria and depression, depending upon how badly I was suckered by the redistribution problems. After a particularly long and frustrating day with the Cisco ASET Lab #1, it suddenly occurred to me that there are many ways to do things, and for some reason, I've been overlooking what may be the best way to deal with redistribution. Those of you who have worked these practice labs know how it goes. You read through the lab, then you start configuring. Step 1 - set up OSPF Step 2 - set up RIP Step 3 - redistribute between OSPF and RIP Step 4 - set up EIGRP Step 5 - redistribute between EIGRP and RIP Step 6 - set up IS-IS Step 7 - redistribute between IS-IS and OSPF Step 8 - scream in anguish as you discover that your routing tables have turned to trash and half your network becomes unreachable. ASET #1 was particularly nasty in how it accomplished Step 8 Which brings me to the topic of this post. CCIE's and folks who've been through the Lab without success - what do you think of this approach: 1) do NOT do any redistribution anyplace until all routing protocols have been configured everywhere. Yes, I know that typically you have a section with several steps, one of which is redistribution. But mark your place and return after the IGPs are up and running and all routes for a particular IGP are where they should be. 2) return to the first redistribution task. Before configuring anything, refer to your diagram ( you DO write out a nice diagram, don't you? ) and ask yourself: after I do one way redistribution, what routes will appear where? 2a) Consider how administrative distance might change things 2b) Follow the redistribution to it's extreme. For example, if you redistribute EIGRP into OSPF, what routers will these routes end up on? Will there be any implications to the routing tables? 3) repeat step 2 for every redistribution point, each time considering the totality of the contents of the redistributed routes. So if you have redistributed IS-IS into OSPF, how do those redistributed routes flow through the OSPF domain? 4) Keep an eye out for things like split horizon 5) every step along the way, consider what routers need to see what routes. Watch for situations where necessary routes do not appear. ( you have probably trashed it because of overzealous filtering. ) 5) If problems occur, such as a routing loop, trace back where the problem route came from, and see what can be done to evade the problem. Summary routes work wonders sometimes. So do route-maps and distribute lists. Re-reading this, I see that this topic does not lend itself well to text. I can say with certainty that I now have a very clear vision of redistribution methodology. I've tested it three times now with different labs, and I believe I am solving the redistribution problems more quickly than ever. I hope that I have painted enough of a picture that some of you can fill in the rest. Chuck -- TANSTAAFL there ain't no such thing as a free lunch _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66320t=66306 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Tricks of the Trade [7:66308]
Another good one!! Could also add that Ospf timers need to be kept in mind if the hub is using say for ex. a multipoint and the spoke a point-to-point and the task is NOT to configure any #ip ospf network cmd. on the spokes From: The Long and Winding Road Reply-To: The Long and Winding Road To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF Tricks of the Trade [7:66308] Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 05:09:30 GMT After wrestling with Solie this afternoon, it suddenly occurred to me that there is a typical instruction in the various practice labs that can end up driving you nuts if you look at it from one direction, but which is really simple if looked at from another. The topology: several routers over frame relay. Usually four routers. One acts as hub, The others as spokes. the instruction: you must use subinterfaces only on the hub. On the spokes you MUST use the physical interfaces. two of the spoke routes connect to the hub via one subinterface. The other router connects to the hub on the other subinterface. the catch: some bizarre restriction or other about network types, commands that can or cannot be used, the usual BS. It occurs to me that working backwards, you can solve most problems, whatever the restrictions and twists. Frame relay: OSPF default - physical interface non broadcast subinterface - p2ppoint-to-point subinterface - multipoint non broadcast I think the knee jerk reaction is to create a multipoint subinterface for the link to the two spoke routers, and a p2p subinterface for the link to the single spoke router. Then moan in despair as you realize that the instructions forbid the use of any ip ospf network commands anywhere. But if you look from the higher level viewpoint, you see that the physical and the multipoint subinterface default to the same type of OSPF network. Life is easier after that. Is this making sense? I'm at the end of a very long day, with too many subtleties floating around in what's left of my brain. Good night, everyone. -- TANSTAAFL there ain't no such thing as a free lunch _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66321t=66308 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specifying a filter-list wt in one cmd? [7:66339]
Hello, I have seen this example on 2 Cisco links and I think that it is wrong as it does not work but anyone with a different experience? Ex. AS300-F(config)#router bgp 300 AS300-F(config-router)#nei 180.80.10.2 filter-list 5 weight 200 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. AS300-F(config-router)# Is this a problem with 25xx's series only? Specifying a route-map to match the filter list and setting the wt works but this way?? Any ideas?? _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66339t=66339 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157]
Thank you Priscilla for yet another awesome reply to my question. Sincerely, CN From: Priscilla Oppenheimer Reply-To: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157] Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:45:20 GMT Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello, Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ?? From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always been set to a number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, is just uses the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop - with no value and it works!! Thus, I am assuming that the ebgp-multihop default value = 255?? Anyone?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN Notice if you configure ebgp-multihop with no parameter, that the show ip bgp neighbors output for that neighbor says: External BGP neighbor may be up to 255 hops away. If you specify a number, such as 2, you'll see: External BGP neighbor may be up to 2 hops away. Not putting a parameter on the command makes life easier, but then again, BGP network operators don't care about easiness. :-) However, if you are going to put a parameter, you need to know the number of hops, which can be a little confusing because just going to a loopback on another router instead of a directly-connected interface counts as a hop. I checked with a sniffer by the way. On the 3-way handshakes, the routers use 255 for the IP TTL regardless, at least on my routers which are running IOS 11.0. That surprised me. But after the 3-way handshake, they start setting the TTL to 1 (if no ebgp-multihop), 255 (if ebgp-multihop is configured with no parameter), and the correct number (if ebgp-multihop is configured with an exact number). That seems like a misbehavior to me (i.e. setting the TTL to 255 for the three-way handshake). You could establish a connection with a router even though you couldn't do anything. You could establish so many that you could cause a DOS. I'll have to do some more testing of this. Priscilla _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66249t=66157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137]
Well, you are right!! Why even use distribute-lists in the first place? Route-maps are more flexible... He can even match as-path 1 and set the filter-list to ^$. This way, in case he has to advertise networks in the future, he does not need to worry about adding it to the acl. And for outbound, prefix-list/distribute-list takes precedence over a filter-list over a route-map. And since this is 2 different ISP's, I would just load-share the traffic for outbound and inbound... Prepend out one ISP for Inbound and set the wt. in on the other for outbound. Or he can also just set 2 static default routes out with one having a higher AD This way, he does not have to depend on the ISP's for the default - more control. Well, that's just my 2c ;- From: Charles D Hammonds Reply-To: Charles D Hammonds To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137] Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 01:58:49 GMT didn't even look at your config the first time 'round, but now that I do... if you're using distribute-lists, why match ip addr again in route-map 6128? remove the match clause and just set as-path prepend (if you must) since you only have the one route. then you can get rid of access-list 30 charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles D Hammonds Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137] that would work, but I would get at least each providers internal routes rather than just a default. and unless it's for financial reasons (i.e. billed per usage) I wouldn't prepend your AS on either link... just let the internet do its thing and choose the best path. Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of J M Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Multihome 2 isp's [7:66137] we are multihomed to 2 isp's on 1 router I only want to send the one network 62.154.91.0 and only want to recieve the default 0.0.0.0 addit9onally i want to prepend our as 23484 outbound to 1 neighbor does this work? is there a better way? router bgp 23484 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 62.154.91.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 146.223.74.37 remote-as 1239 neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 146.223.74.37 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 remote-as 6128 neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 20 in neighbor 162.206.236.69 distribute-list 10 out neighbor 162.206.236.69 route-map 6128 out no auto-summary ! ip classless no ip http server ip http access-class 1 ! access-list 10 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 20 permit 0.0.0.0 log access-list 30 permit 62.154.91.0 0.0.0.255 route-map 6128 permit 30 match ip address 30 set as-path prepend 23484 ! _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66250t=66137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP default-originate crashes the router everytime - Why?? [7:66258]
Hello, Everytime, I configure #nei a.b.c.d default-originate on my routers, it crashes the router. I have tried this on different routers and it's the same result every time. Is this a problem on 25xx's series? My routers have 16Flash and 16Dram. Anyone with a similar experience? Thank you. Sincerely, CN Excerpt from my router: AS1239-A(config-router)#nei 180.80.10.1 default-originate AS1239-A(config-router)# === Flushing messages (21:04:23 UTC Mon Mar 1 1993) === Buffered messages: 00:00:12: %SYS-7-NV_BLOCK_INIT: Initalized the geometry of nvram 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:00:14: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:00:15: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:00:15: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:01:54: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 00:01:56: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up 00:02:01: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to administratively down 00:02:02: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1, changed state to down 00:02:02: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console 00:02:50: %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JK8OS-L), Version 12.2(1), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Apr-01 15:20 by cmong 00:03:10: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up 01:20:21: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 01:50:45: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:09:35: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:12:12: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 160.60.10.1 Up 19:30:06: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 19:52:26: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:02:48: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:11:47: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:35:37: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:44:02: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Down Interface flap 20:44:02: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:44:04: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down 20:44:05: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 20:49:20: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 20:49:21: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 20:49:22: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 20:49:30: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up 21:00:44: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Down Interface flap 21:00:45: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 21:00:46: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down 21:00:47: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down 21:01:19: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console 21:01:21: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 21:01:22: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to up 21:01:47: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 180.80.10.1 Up Queued messages: Exception: Illegal Instruction at 0x0 (PC) System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(8a), RELEASE SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1995 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 14336 Kbytes of main memory F3: 15343148+1154396+1180856 at 0x360 Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JK8OS-L), Version 12.2(1), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 27-Apr-01 15:20 by cmong Image text-base: 0x0307EE08, data-base: 0x1000 Compliance with U.S. Export Laws and Regulations - Encryption This product performs encryption and is regulated for export by the U.S. Government. This product is not authorized for use by persons located outside the United States and Canada that do not have prior approval from Cisco Systems, Inc. or the U.S. Government. This product may not be exported outside the U.S. and Canada either by physical or electronic means without PRIOR approval of Cisco Systems, Inc. or the U.S. Government. Persons outside the U.S. and Canada may not re-export, resell, or transfer this product by either physical or electronic means without prior approval
Ebgp multihop in a NBMA medium?? [7:66149]
Hello, If RTA, RTB and RTC are in a FR multipoint config, with RTA in AS100 and RTB and RTC in AS200 with RTB peering with RTA and RTC, does the next-hop-self need to be set on RTB for BOTH RTA and RTC, IF BOTH RTA and RTC are advertising networks?? I definitely understand that if RTC were adverting 10.0.0.0/8, RTB would set itself as the next-hop-self for RTA to get to 10.0.0.0/8. Now if RTA also advertises netw. 20.0.0.0/8, would RTB need to be set as the next-hop-self for RTC to get to 20.0.0.0/8? Which basically means that RTB needs to be set as the next-hop-self for both RTA and RTC?? Now to add to this, if you are running an IGP for the networks that connect these 3 routers, if the next-hop-self even necessary? Please advise. Thank you. Sincerely, CN P.S. My Internet connection via Cox is down at this moment (thank you Cox..as usual) so I cannot get to my routers from work to try this out!! _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66149t=66149 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ebgp-multihop default value?? [7:66157]
Hello, Is the ebgp-multihop default value = 255 ?? From all the examples that I have seen and done, it has always been set to a number ex. 2 or 200 or 255 etc. but doing an example from CCO, is just uses the cmd. # neighbor a.b.c.d ebgp-multihop - with no value and it works!! Thus, I am assuming that the ebgp-multihop default value = 255?? Anyone?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66157t=66157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127]
I do this every day for customers.They have 2 or more T-1's and would like to make sure that the circuit stays up if one of the T's go downAND they want to load balance their trafficUsing lo0 and ebgp multihop and using CEF with per-packet or per-destination achieves this. From: The Long and Winding Road Reply-To: The Long and Winding Road To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ebgp vs ebgp multihop [7:66127] Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:48:53 GMT wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, i would like to know your opinion/experience about using ebgp multihop comparing with ebgp. AFAIK, ebgp was designed for directly connected only and using ebgp multhop is not recomended for ISP envy. would you please tell me the caveat of using ebgp multihop for ISP envy. While I don't know about the ISP environment, I've done several BGP labs with other folks in different parts of the country. EBGP Multihop is a necessary part of this, obviously. I suppose in real world the advantage is that you can peer loopbacks, rather than just the physical interfaces. Another thing that comes to mind, applicable to ISP and corporate environments, is that your iBGP routers can be located in different parts of your network, eliminating the need for physical adjaceny. Any comments would be appreciated. regards hendro mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66164t=66127 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP Port 1790 in an acl? [7:65738]
Hello, Does tcp port 1790 have to be permitted both ways (similiar to bgp and dlsw)? Ex. #permit tcp any any eq 1790 #permit tcp any eq 1790 any Could someone clarify this for me? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66022t=65738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPLS book for CCIP-which one?? [7:66026]
Hello, Is there one solid book for preparing for the MPLS exam for the CCIP? I checked a couple and not sure which one might be sufficient JUST for the exam, yes I need one JUST for the exam as I will not be using it in my job :-( - everything from BGP to QOS BUT MPLS and thus.. The books are: 1. MPLS and VPN architectures, CCIP Edition by Pepelnjak Guichard 2. Advanced MPLS by Alwayn 3. Traffic Engineering with MPLS by Osborne Simha Now I have heard from many that they have taken this exam numerous times and still failed!! So this exam must really be tough and to think that Cisco has made this exam mandatory now!! I would gratefully appreciate some positive feedback on this. Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66026t=66026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AS-Path acl question?? [7:65988]
Hello, Can any explain what these EXACTLY mean? ip as-path access-list 1 permit _109_ ip as-path access-list 2 permit _200$ ip as-path access-list 2 permit ^100$ Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65988t=65988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP bestpath as-path ignore - Hidden cmd?? [7:65987]
Hello, Why is BGP bestpath as-path ignore a hidden cmd - if it indeed is?? Here is what I got: AS7018-NAP(config)#router bgp 7018 AS7018-NAP(config-router)#bgp bestpath as? % Unrecognized command AS7018-NAP(config-router)#bgp bestpath as-path ? % Unrecognized command AS7018-NAP(config-router)#bgp bestpath as-path ignore AS7018-NAP(config-router)# AS7018-NAP#rbr router bgp 7018 no synchronization bgp router-id 150.50.100.100 bgp log-neighbor-changes bgp bestpath as-path ignore Any ideas?? _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65987t=65987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using communites to change the local-pref - not working?? [7:65993]
Hello, I have 2 routers in AS300 RTF is connected to RTA in AS 1239 RTG is connected to RTH in AS 701 In AS300 I have set communities via a route-map to be advertised as follows: 1239:110 to AS 1239 701:120 to AS 701 Routers in AS 1239 and AS 701 have been configured with a community list and a route-map to match these communities and change the local pref to 110 and 120 respectively. These work fine: Ex.AS701-H#bt Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 3.3.3.0/24 190.90.10.1 120 0 300 i Ex. AS1239-A#bt Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 3.3.3.0/24 180.80.10.1 0110 0 300 i AS1239 and AS701 are connected to RTE AS7018-NAP From AS7018, I wanted to route to be preferred through AS701 which has a higher local pref of 120 BUT AS7018 still prefers the route thru AS1239 which has a local pref. And I do not see the local pref values in AS7018. Why?? Ex. AS7018-NAP#bt Network Next HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path * 3.3.3.0/24 170.70.10.20 701 300 i * 160.60.10.20 1239 300 i 160.60.10.2 is AS1239 Now I do understand that all things being equal, BGP will prefer the router with the lowest RID, which in this case is AS1239, 160.60.100.100. Thus AS7018 chooses this route. BUT I want AS7018 to choose AS701 to get to AS300's networks!!! Question: Should AS7018 on receiving the communites from AS1239 and AS701 set the desired local pref?? Why not?? What am I missing? Please advise. Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65993t=65993 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TCP Port 1790 in an acl? [7:65738]
Hello, Does tcp port 1790 have to be permitted both ways (similiar to bgp and dlsw)? Ex. #permit tcp any any eq 1790 #permit tcp any eq 1790 any Could someone clarify this for me? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65738t=65738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
custom queuing to cbwfq?? [7:65753]
Hello, Have a custom queue configured that I would like to change to a more modular class-based wfq. Would one use the bandwidth percent cmd. or just the bandwidth cmd. to specify the byte-size and queue-limit for tail-drop?? Here is what I have: #queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 #queue-list 1 protocol ipx 2 #queue-list 1 protocol appletalk 3 #queue-list 1 default 4 #queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 4000 limit 100 #queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 3000 limit 90 #queue-list 1 queue 3 byte-count 2000 limit 80 #queue-list 1 queue 4 byte-count 1000 limit 70 The link is a 256K line: Here is what I would like to do: Have this class-maps configured: R7#sh ru | beg class-map class-map match-all default-class match none class-map match-all class2 match protocol ipx class-map match-all class3 match protocol appletalk class-map match-all class1 match protocol ip Have the policy-map configured: policy-map policy1 class class1 bandwidth percent 40 queue-limit 100 class class2 bandwidth percent 30 queue-limit 90 class class3 bandwidth percent 20 queue-limit 80 class class-default bandwidth percent 10 queue-limit 70 Question is how would I calculate the bandwidth percent value for the 4000 bytes? Is 40% actually right?? And the same if just the bandwidth cmd. was used? Thank you for your help. Sincerely, CN _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65753t=65753 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Certification [7:65759]
the new CCNP exams are already in place and you are correct in stating that it will renew your CCNA cert. Go to cisco.com and check the outlines of the tests to see specifically what they cover. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65784t=65759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Virtual link authentication - observation [7:65628]
To add to this: Here is another one that made me pull my hair out: Maybe you can help shed some light on this one for me: MD5 auth. in area 0 Specified #area 0 auth message-digest in the transit area (area 1) Only specified#area 1 virtual-link x.x.x.x Ditto config. on the other area 1 router: This works...but why?? I always thought that you had to specify the md5 authentication in the virtual-link cmd. but it appears not so. Here is what did catch my eye: When specifying the md5 key, the VL does use key 1 Ex. Message digest authentication enabled Youngest key id is 1 but when NOT specifying it, it uses the default-key 0 and this still works even though area 0 is using key 1 !!! Ex. Message digest authentication enabled No key configured, using default key id 0 But MOST IMPORTANT: will any points be deducted by the proctor god in the Lab if one does not specify the md5 keyword in the VL cmd?? From: The Long and Winding Road Reply-To: The Long and Winding Road To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF Virtual link authentication - observations [7:65628] Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 05:04:47 GMT Not sure I have this all sorted out correctly. Perhaps those with a bit more experience might add their wisdom, not to mention their corrections. The ospf virtual link being what it is, it follows rules similar to any other interface. It does appear, though, that in terms of structure, it looks something like this: ( commands under the ospf process ) area X authentication area X virtual-link y.y.y.y authentication area X virtual-link y.y.y.y authentication-key WORD where X is the non zero area number over which the virtual link transits. In other words, for purposes of structure, the virtual link is not really part of area 0. It is a point-to-point link that is part of the non zero transit area. Am I understanding this correctly? I have a setup working, where the area 0 authentication is simple and the transit area authentication is MD5, and no adjacency is formed across the virtual link with simple authentication, but comes up just fine with MD5. Any comments are appreciated. -- TANSTAAFL there ain't no such thing as a free lunch _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65660t=65628 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Going NUTS!!! WAS:ISIS area password NOT same but still works?? [7:65511]
OK, the same effect on domain password: Had Caslow on one side and caslow on the other area.NO problemit still works!! Cleared the clns neigh, isis *, ip route * shut the intf.. etcbut still it works.Why?? Anyone?? From: Cisco Nuts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISIS area password NOT same but still works?? Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:50:27 + Hello, Have 2 routers with isis area passwords configuredOne has #area-password FRED and the other #area-password Fred. Adjacencies form (as explained) but the routes area exchanged too!! This should NOT happen as the passwords don't match even though they are in the same area. Incidentally, a 3rd router in another area NOT configured for any authentication see all other routers?? This is as it should work. NO problem...But shouldn't this be thought of as a weakness in ISIS authentication?? Any ideas. Thanks!! Sincerely, CN BTW: I am following NetMaster Class' paper on Isis authentication. Got to go back and check Doyle now... _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65511t=65511 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISIS area password NOT same but still works?? [7:65508]
Hello, Have 2 routers with isis area passwords configuredOne has #area-password FRED and the other #area-password Fred. Adjacencies form (as explained) but the routes area exchanged too!! This should NOT happen as the passwords don't match even though they are in the same area. Incidentally, a 3rd router in another area NOT configured for any authentication see all other routers?? This is as it should work. NO problem...But shouldn't this be thought of as a weakness in ISIS authentication?? Any ideas. Thanks!! Sincerely, CN BTW: I am following NetMaster Class' paper on Isis authentication. Got to go back and check Doyle now... _ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65508t=65508 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Back-to-back FR P2P circuits with Different Dlci's - NOT [7:65355]
Hello, Does any one know why if 2 routers configured back-to-back for frame relay point-to-point intf. using different dlci's does NOT work? Unless, they are defined the same on both routers, does it work!! Here is my config: R5#ri s1.1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 147 bytes ! interface Serial1.1 point-to-point ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip router isis frame-relay interface-dlci 102 clns router isis end R5# R6#ri s0.1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 200 bytes ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip router isis ip pim sparse-dense-mode frame-relay interface-dlci 102 clns router isis isis circuit-type level-1 end R6#ping 1.1.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 32/32/36 ms R6# Now change the dlci # on R6: R6#ri s0.1 Building configuration... Current configuration : 200 bytes ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip router isis ip pim sparse-dense-mode frame-relay interface-dlci 201 clns router isis isis circuit-type level-1 end R6#ping 1.1.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) R6# Can any one explain?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65355t=65355 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Workbook homelab ? [7:65161]
In that case, I would recommend CCOnlinelabs.com.You have over 12 routers to play with and 2 switches along with isdn and atmYou can configure these routers to simulate any of those major labs or your own...Best of all, is the price, $30.00 for 5.5 hours which is imho, what your target should be to complete one full lab!! (so that in the actual exam, you have over 2 hours to review all your silly mistakes :- And to add that Tony is of great help if you run into any problems. He himself is a CCIE. Good Luck. From: Jason Viera Reply-To: Jason Viera To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Workbook homelab ? [7:65161] Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:05:46 GMT Also Keep in mind that many of the companies selling the major labs have only a few tasks to be configured on some of the perimeter routers(in my experience), they really just want you to rent rack time from them at outrageous prices. The labs can be modified to give you the same learning experience although it requires a great deal of time and effort! IMHO Jason richard dumoulin wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I was wondering whether the people who passed the lab and used the well known prep lab workbooks did adapt their own home lab to do the exercises or bought all the necessary routers/switches to set up the 13 router lab or just purchased remote rack. I myself possess 6 routers but they are only sufficient to do the Solie's labs, not more. Thanks misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65425t=65161 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Default-information originate in ISIS?? [7:65443]
Hello, I have 2 L-1 routers connected to a L1-L2 router via frame-relay. Referring to Doyle's Vol. I, there are 2 ways to generate a default route in the L-1 routers pointing to the L1-L2 router: 1. #default-information originate - on the L1-L2 router #ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 null0 - works!! 2. configure #clns routing and #clns router isis on the intf. This will generate a default route in the L-1 routers - also works! Question: I removed the command #clns routing and #clns router isis from the L-1 routers and #clns router isis on the L1-L2 router and bounced the interfaces. I also did a #clear ip route * I still see the default route in the L-1 router?? Is this the default in Ios 12.2.1 Enterprise? Or something else? Thank you for your help. Sincerely, CN _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65443t=65443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Visio Stencil [7:65281]
I have the same question. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65320t=65281 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Diffence between 640-605 and 640-505 [7:65319]
Hi Group, I will take my 640-605 test tomorrow. I have prepared the test using cisco press 640-505. Can any one tell me what difference between 640-605 and 640-505? Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65319t=65319 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When to use PIM nbma-mode?? [7:65187]
Hello, When is the cmd. ip pim nbma-mode actually used in a frame-relay hub and spoke topology? In my testing , I have found out that if the RP happens to be in one of the spokes say spoke A, then it is needed for the other spoke, spoke B to get to a multicast group configured on spoke A? Is this correct? If the RP happens to be on the Hub router then everything works fine without using nbma-mode, correct? Thank you for your help. Sincerely, CN _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65187t=65187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833]
Howard, Why in the world would Cisco start at 92001 for the CCSI? Any particular reason for such a high number? Now we all know for a fact why the CCIE # start at 1025? So From: Howard C. Berkowitz Reply-To: Howard C. Berkowitz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833] Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:04:28 GMT Howard CSSI 93005 Howard, If you were a Cisco Instructor years ago, is it safe to assume the CSSI number started at 93000?? Just curios. 92001, I believe. Not sure. On a serious note, are you allowed to still add the cert and number after your name if you become inactive? No one ever really came up with a good set of rules. Recertification was never as well defined as it was with CCIE and the like. I have no problem in saying inactive -- the irony being that I'm currently on a subcontract developing internal courseware for Cisco staff. Since a CSSI is not all that meaningful except in the context of a training partner, the active-versus-inactive distinction isn't that significant -- if you are doing approved Cisco training, it will be active with the partner; if you aren't, it won't. It's not as if you can go into business as a Cisco instructor just by having a CSSI. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64854t=64833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64864t=64833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833]
Howard, Why in the world would Cisco start at 92001 for the CCSI? Any particular reason for such a high number? Now we all know for a fact why the CCIE # start at 1025? So who was the first CCSI?? Does anyone know? From: Howard C. Berkowitz Reply-To: Howard C. Berkowitz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: General comments on Cisco Teaching [7:64833] Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:04:28 GMT Howard CSSI 93005 Howard, If you were a Cisco Instructor years ago, is it safe to assume the CSSI number started at 93000?? Just curios. 92001, I believe. Not sure. On a serious note, are you allowed to still add the cert and number after your name if you become inactive? No one ever really came up with a good set of rules. Recertification was never as well defined as it was with CCIE and the like. I have no problem in saying inactive -- the irony being that I'm currently on a subcontract developing internal courseware for Cisco staff. Since a CSSI is not all that meaningful except in the context of a training partner, the active-versus-inactive distinction isn't that significant -- if you are doing approved Cisco training, it will be active with the partner; if you aren't, it won't. It's not as if you can go into business as a Cisco instructor just by having a CSSI. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64854t=64833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64865t=64833 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Memory purchase [7:64605]
Here is the company we tend to use: http://www.orcalogic.co.uk Regards, Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 March 2003 14:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Memory purchase [7:64605] Where can I find flash memory for 2500 series routers? Thanks in advance. MF Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64698t=64605 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Port 1720 - ?? [7:64267]
Hello,Could someone explain what port 1720 is used for in terms of voice?Ex. access-list 199 permit tcp any any eq 1720 access-list 199 permit tcp any eq 1720 any Thanks.Sincerely,CN MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64267t=64267 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clock rate 64000 = Bandwidth 64000 - ? [7:64147]
Hello,If the clock rate has been configured for 64000 on one side of the link (home lab), does that mean that the bandwidth needs to be set to 64000 on both sides of the link using the bandwidth command so that routing protocols like Ospf correctly compute the metrics? After all, isn't the default bandwidth (1.544M) cosmetic inspite of the link having been configured with clock rate = 64000?Thanks for the clarification.Sincerely,CN Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64147t=64147 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
atm topics in the lab? [7:64194]
Hello group, Hate to ask this (as this has been asked a million times before) but just wanted a confirmation on what I should cover for the atm portion of the lab?Sincerely,CN STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64194t=64194 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
atm topics in the lab? [7:64193]
Hello group, Hate to ask this (as this has been asked a million times before) but just wanted a confirmation on what I should cover for the atm portion of the lab?Sincerely,CN Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64193t=64193 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prevent loops at Multiple Redistribution points?? [7:64087]
Hello, I have 4 routers, R1, R2 and R3 running Ospf and R1, R3 and R4 running Eigrp. Mutual redistribution on R1 and R3 between Ospf and Eigrp.Is there a neat and clean way to prevent Ospf routes coming back to Eigrp and vice-versa? I was thinking the following:1st option: Use the distance cmd.Set the distance to 130 to both protocols. Then set the right dist. for both Ospf and Eigrp referenced by an ACL. 2nd option: Use distribute-listsSet distribute-list out under both Ospf and Eigrp permitting and denying Eigrp routes referenced by an ACL 3rd option: Use tagsMatch and set tags in both directions. Any advice is gratefully appreciated.Thank you.Sincerely,CN MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64087t=64087 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cannot ping ospf routes from a rip router? [7:63864]
Hello, I have 3 routers setup, running ospf and rip ver 1 with 2 way redistribution on the middle router.The ospf routers have loopbacks as 10.8.8.8/24 and 10.9.9.9/24The rip router has a loopback of 10.2.2.2/24.The middle router running rip has networks 10 and netw 120 defined.I cannot ping 10.9.9.9 or 10.8.8.8 from the rip routerWithout configuring static routes, how can I ping these networks?Thank you for your help.Sincerely,CN Config. on the middle router running both rip and ospf:R1-E#rbr router ospf 999 log-adjacency-changes redistribute connected subnets redistribute rip subnets network 120.20.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 120.20.40.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! router rip redistribute connected metric 2 redistribute ospf 999 metric 2 network 10.0.0.0 network 120.0.0.0 From the rip router:R2-B#r C192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 10.2.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 120.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets R 120.20.40.0 [120/1] via 120.20.20.2, 00:00:14, Serial0 R 120.20.30.0 [120/1] via 120.20.20.2, 00:00:14, Serial0 C 120.20.20.0 is directly connected, Serial0 R2-B#ping 10.9.9.9Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.9.9.9, timeout is 2 seconds: . Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) R2-B# Any ideas?? MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63864t=63864 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cannot see Rip routes with route-tagging - Why? [7:63900]
Hello,I have R6, R5 and R4 running rip ver 2, network 178.1.10.0 subnetsR5, R4 and R2 running eigrp 2 network 181.16.2.0 subnets.R5 and R4 had mutual redistribution setup using route tagging.R6 correctly sees the eigrp redistributed routes but R2 is NOT seeing any rip redistributed routes. Any help is appreciated. Config. on R5 (ditto config on R4)R5#rbr router eigrp 2 redistribute rip metric 1 1 1 1 1 route-map r2e network 181.16.2.8 0.0.0.3 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes ! router rip version 2 redistribute eigrp 2 metric 2 route-map e2r network 172.31.0.0 network 178.1.0.0 no auto-summary route-map e2r deny 10 match tag 77 ! route-map e2r permit 20 set tag 88 ! route-map r2e deny 10 match tag 88 ! route-map r2e permit 20 set tag 77 Routing table on R2 ( Does not show any Rip routes)R2#r 181.16.0.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets C 181.16.2.4 is directly connected, Serial1 C 181.16.2.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0 D 181.16.2.12 [90/679936] via 181.16.2.6, 00:40:47, Serial1 C 181.16.2.8 is directly connected, Serial0.234 Config:R2#rbr router eigrp 2 network 181.16.2.0 0.0.0.3 network 181.16.2.4 0.0.0.3 network 181.16.2.8 0.0.0.3 no auto-summary no eigrp log-neighbor-changes R2 and R5 running FR with ip split-horizon enabled on. Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63900t=63900 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cannot see Rip routes with route-tagging - Config on R6 [7:63901]
Hello,Here is the config on R6 the Rip router receiving the redistributed Eigrp routes: R6#r 178.1.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets C 178.1.10.0 is directly connected, TokenRing0 C 178.1.10.4 is directly connected, Ethernet0 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1 181.16.0.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets R 181.16.2.4 [120/2] via 178.1.10.5, 00:00:00, Ethernet0 [120/2] via 178.1.10.1, 00:00:06, TokenRing0 R 181.16.2.0 [120/2] via 178.1.10.5, 00:00:00, Ethernet0 [120/2] via 178.1.10.1, 00:00:06, TokenRing0 R 181.16.2.12 [120/2] via 178.1.10.5, 00:00:01, Ethernet0 [120/2] via 178.1.10.1, 00:00:07, TokenRing0 R 181.16.2.8 [120/2] via 178.1.10.5, 00:00:01, Ethernet0 [120/2] via 178.1.10.1, 00:00:07, TokenRing0 R6#ping 181.16.2.10Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 181.16.2.10, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/17/36 ms R6#ping 181.16.2.2Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 181.16.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/24/40 ms R6#ping 181.16.2.1Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 181.16.2.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/30/64 ms R6#ping 181.16.2.9Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 181.16.2.9, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/30/64 ms R6#ping 181.16.2.13Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 181.16.2.13, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 36/69/96 ms R6# Why can't it be the same on R2 the Eigrp router?Thank you for all your help.Sincerely,CN Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63901t=63901 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ospf to Rip Redistribution - Setting TAGS?? [7:63734]
Hello, I am trying to understand route redistribution from ospf to rip using tags. This example is taken from CCO: With the following configuration, OSPF external routes with tags 1, 2, 3, and 5 are redistributed into RIP with metrics of 1, 1, 5, and 5, respectively. The OSPF routes with a tag of 4 are not redistributed. router rip redistribute ospf 109 route-map 1 ! route-map 1 permit match tag 1 2 set metric 1 ! route-map 1 permit match tag 3 set metric 5 ! route-map 1 deny match tag 4 ! route map 1 permit match tag 5 set metric 5 I see that the tag values are arbitrary. Question is: How does RIP match tags 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5? Is there a cmd. missing in this example? I am thinking in term of access-lists where you match ip address 1 and that ip address reference acl 1. In this example, what references tags 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 so that the metric gets set to a value?? And more specifically, how does routes that match tag 4 get denied? Please advise.Thank you.Sincerely,CN Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63734t=63734 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ospf demand circuits or dialer watch?? [7:63591]
Hello, Is the command ip ospf demand-circuit under the isdn bri interface redundant when dialer-watch is configured. I am thinking in terms of backup interface cmd. and backup using dialer profiles. Since dialer-watch falls under the same category, using the additional ip ospf demand-circuit makes it redundant so dial-backup will never really work?? Please advise.Thank you.Sincerely,CN Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63591t=63591 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filtering SNA and NetBios traffic? [7:63593]
Hello, This one has been bugging me for quite some time and I can never really get it down cold i.e. filtering SNA and NetBios traffic.Here is one typical task that I got stumped on: Task: Configure a filter 200 to explicitly allow SNA. Explicitly deny NetBios and permit all other protocols.My solution:#access-list 200 permit 0x 0x0D0D#access-list 200 deny 0xF0F0 0x0101#access-list 200 permit 0x 0x Actual Solution:#access-list 200 permit 0xF0F0 0x0101#access-list 200 deny 0x 0x Common sense tells me that this solution proposed is wrong. But I wanted to put this out to the group and get the real answer. Please advise.Thank you.Sincerely,CN MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63593t=63593 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
30% of BW for custom-queue-list - How much? [7:63448]
Hello,If the requirement is to configure 30% of the bandwidth on the serial port (1.544MB) for ipx traffic, how much will that be?I calculated (1.544 X 1024)/(30/100)? Is this how it's done or is there a right way to do this to get the actual value?Thank you.Sincerely,CN Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63448t=63448 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3550 config guide...Any out there yet?? [7:63359]
Actually, I got tons of it now. I would start with CCO - this is the best. Then the freebies from ipexpert.net, ccbootcamp.com, bradshawlabs.com and netmasterclass.net. These should be ample. Use the doc cd online to get to the 3550 url: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/home/home.htm Once you get here, click under Catalyst switches - Catalyst 3550 and click on the first one for Release 12.1 (12c). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3550 config guide...Any out there yet?? Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:24:06 -0300 Could you tell me were you got the link about 3550? I am asking it because I am using the BluePrint to study and there is not that link. The link I am using is http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/rsblueprint.html Thanks in Advance = Hello,Since the 3550's are going to kill us in the new Lab, has anyone come out with a config. guide book or a cd-simulator, similiarly to the Cat5 from Cisco? Also, on CCO, I see this one link for the 3550: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_configuration_guide_book09186a008007f368.html Is this sufficient for the Lab? Please advise.Thank you.Sincerely,CN _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63359t=63359 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isdn error with PPP - Why always?? [7:63255]
Hello, Just set up basic Isdn b/w 2 routers using the default hdlc encap and was working perfectly fine till I changed the encap to ppp, ppp auth chap, ppp multilink and ppp chap hostname R7. Then it just stopped working :- This has been very frustrating!! It started spitting out this msg. on the screen:R8-G# 4d19h: %ISDN-4-INVALID_CALLEDNUMBER: Interface BR0, Ignoring call, LDN and Called Party Number mismatch I looked to see if the called number had changed even though I had not touched it. It is still valid and so are the spids. R8-G#ri b0 Building configuration...Current configuration : 353 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 9.9.9.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf demand-circuit dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 9.9.9.1 broadcast 5553000 dialer load-threshold 1 outbound dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 055511 5551000 isdn spid2 055521 5552000 R8-G#sh is st TEI Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-niter Age Seq# C Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 123, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI = 124, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI 123, ces = 1, state = 5(init) spid1 configured, spid1 sent, spid1 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1 TEI 124, ces = 2, state = 5(init) spid2 configured, spid2 sent, spid2 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 3, tid = 1 Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) CCB:callid=801C, sapi=0, ces=1, B-chan=1, calltype=DATA Active dsl 0 CCBs = 1 The Free Channel Mask: 0x8002 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 1 I am beginning to guess that the problem is a HARDWARE one with the ISDN switch being the culprit. I guess as usual I need to give it rest for a couple of hours and start it again for this to work with just HDLC encap. To think that I was told that the Merge switch was the Rolls Royce of ISDN switches when I paid a million $$ for it last year :-(But if any one has any suggestions/advice, I would gratefully appreciate it.Thank you.Sincerely,CN STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63255t=63255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Isdn error with PPP - Well...NEVER again !!!! [7:63301]
Alright!! After many many months of frustration with what I thought was a problem with ppp encap, it turned out to be something else. As Stuart correctly pointed me to this url (which I have no idea why I did not look it up earlier) the problem lies with using LDN along with the SPID #'s. Thank you Stuart for this one. I tested it first using just plain HDLC, then with plain PPP, then added ppp auth chap, then ppp chap hostanme and then with finally what I presumed to be the culprit, ppp multilink. But lo behold!! all of these worked with NO problem when the LDN # is not specified along with the SPID #. Here is my config: Current configuration : 455 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 9.9.9.1 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp ip ospf network broadcast ip ospf demand-circuit dialer map ip 9.9.9.2 broadcast 5553000 dialer load-threshold 1 either dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 055511 isdn spid2 055521 cdapi buffers regular 0 cdapi buffers raw 0 cdapi buffers large 0 ppp authentication chap ppp chap hostname backup ppp chap password 7 121A061902 ppp multilink end R8#ping 9.9.9.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 9.9.9.2, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 36/38/40 ms R8# Hope this helps others like me with similiar problems From: Stuart Potts Reply-To: Stuart Potts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Isdn error with PPP - Why always?? [7:63255] Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:34:19 GMT For more information; http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri_invalid_spid.html regards /Stuart -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: 18 February 2003 15:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Isdn error with PPP - Why always?? [7:63255] try debug isdn q931, this may give you some more info. Dave Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello, Just set up basic Isdn b/w 2 routers using the default hdlc encap and was working perfectly fine till I changed the encap to ppp, ppp auth chap, ppp multilink and ppp chap hostname R7. Then it just stopped working :- out this msg. on the screen:R8-G# 4d19h: %ISDN-4-INVALID_CALLEDNUMBER: Interface BR0, Ignoring call, LDN and Called Party Number mismatch I looked to see if the called number had changed even though I had not touched it. It is still valid and so are the spids. R8-G#ri b0 Building configuration...Current configuration : 353 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 9.9.9.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf demand-circuit dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 9.9.9.1 broadcast 5553000 dialer load-threshold 1 outbound dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 055511 5551000 isdn spid2 055521 5552000 R8-G#sh is st TEI Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-niter Age Seq# C Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 123, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI = 124, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI 123, ces = 1, state = 5(init) spid1 configured, spid1 sent, spid1 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1 TEI 124, ces = 2, state = 5(init) spid2 configured, spid2 sent, spid2 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 3, tid = 1 Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) CCB:callid=801C, sapi=0, ces=1, B-chan=1, calltype=DATA Active dsl 0 CCBs = 1 The Free Channel Mask: 0x8002 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 1 I am beginning to guess that the problem is a HARDWARE one with the ISDN switch being the culprit. I guess as usual I need to give it rest for a couple of hours and start it again for this to work with just HDLC encap. To think that I was told that the Merge switch was the Rolls Royce of ISDN switches when I paid a million $$ for it last year :-(But if any one has any suggestions/advice, I would gratefully appreciate it.Thank you.Sincerely,CN STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 You don't make the poor richer by making the rich misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63301t=63301 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Isdn error with PPP - Why always?? [7:63255]
Now I had definitely heard of the notorios ppp multilink!! Just haven't nailed it down for now. Also using peer ip address and no peer neighbor-route. I will try it later as I am hesitant to use ppp encap right now lest I get frustrated and lose another hour in my studies. I had to reboot the switch and the routers and with hdlc encap, dialer profiles, floating statics, backup intf's. work like a champ along with legacy ddr. Thank you. Sincerely, CN From: Debbie Westall Reply-To: Debbie Westall To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Isdn error with PPP - Why always?? [7:63255] Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:02:46 GMT I frequently have trouble when I go from hdlc to ppp. Usually it's something I didn't configure with the ppp. I take one command out at a time that I added until things come back up. I start with removing ppp multilink. also you may want to turn on some debugs debug dialer debug ppp negot debug ppp authen Debbie On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello, Just set up basic Isdn b/w 2 routers using the default hdlc encap and was working perfectly fine till I changed the encap to ppp, ppp auth chap, ppp multilink and ppp chap hostname R7. Then it just stopped working :- out this msg. on the screen:R8-G# 4d19h: %ISDN-4-INVALID_CALLEDNUMBER: Interface BR0, Ignoring call, LDN and Called Party Number mismatch I looked to see if the called number had changed even though I had not touched it. It is still valid and so are the spids. R8-G#ri b0 Building configuration...Current configuration : 353 bytes ! interface BRI0 ip address 9.9.9.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf demand-circuit dialer idle-timeout 90 dialer map ip 9.9.9.1 broadcast 5553000 dialer load-threshold 1 outbound dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 055511 5551000 isdn spid2 055521 5552000 R8-G#sh is st TEI Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-niter Age Seq# C Layer 1 Status: ACTIVE Layer 2 Status: TEI = 123, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI = 124, Ces = 2, SAPI = 0, State = MULTIPLE_FRAME_ESTABLISHED TEI 123, ces = 1, state = 5(init) spid1 configured, spid1 sent, spid1 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 1, tid = 1 TEI 124, ces = 2, state = 5(init) spid2 configured, spid2 sent, spid2 valid Endpoint ID Info: epsf = 0, usid = 3, tid = 1 Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) CCB:callid=801C, sapi=0, ces=1, B-chan=1, calltype=DATA Active dsl 0 CCBs = 1 The Free Channel Mask: 0x8002 Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 1 I am beginning to guess that the problem is a HARDWARE one with the ISDN switch being the culprit. I guess as usual I need to give it rest for a couple of hours and start it again for this to work with just HDLC encap. To think that I was told that the Merge switch was the Rolls Royce of ISDN switches when I paid a million $$ for it last year :-(But if any one has any suggestions/advice, I would gratefully appreciate it.Thank you.Sincerely,CN STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63283t=63255 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: New Instructor Experiences [7:62826]
John, First...CONGRATS You can do it!! Yes, there area moments when you feel that way...especially the first couple of timesbut in the end you will come out a champ!! When I started teaching the CCNA/NP a couple of years back, I too felt the same initially, but personally, teaching has been the best thing for me in my life!! I love teaching and am passionate about it. I am just dying to pass the CCIE Lab so I can begin my own tutoring in my basement for the CCNA/NP/IP courses. The trick is to really prepare for it the night before and then dive straight to the hands-on section in the class. Then start explaining the concepts about the material as you do the hands-on. Students love the hands-on!! Preparing your own notes help as students respect you more than just saying Ok guys, let's turn to page 31 and talk about Ospf. Ospf is. Good Luck. From: John Neiberger Reply-To: John Neiberger To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: New Instructor Experiences [7:62826] Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:12:07 GMT I just feel the need to rant/vent for a bit and I knew there were a bunch of you who might be able to relate to this. I've started teaching a short, one-session general networking class for some of the people here at the bank. The first session, which was really just a runthrough with a handful of students, went fairly well. In fact, it went so well that they increased the number of overall attendees to about 60 or so. Last week I had another session that went exceptionally well, except for a couple of students who really didn't want to be there. I couldn't have asked for it to go better, and my boss heard lots of good things about it. One person even said I should be a professor! :-) Now, that brings us to today Today I had an afternoon class, and in my opinion it sucked rotten eggs. I feel embarrassed to have been involved with it.I can't think of too many ways in which it could have gone worse. I rambled, I flew through 2.5 hours of material in about an hour, I lost my place a lot. I'm not certain that I ever formed a train of thought longer than a couple of cars, and I think even those trains were without engine and caboose. Have any of you other instructors had days like that? As I even mentioned in class, I felt like my 'explainer' was broken today, and it certainly was. I'm hoping that I could get some sympathy from other instructors with similar experiences. Okay, I'm going to go drown my disappointment in some coffee! John _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62857t=62826 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab - I have seen he future and it is.... [7:62776]
Hello Charles, With due respect I ask, why did you abandon your quest for the CCIE? I am curious as to how many times you actually hit the Lab? Sincerely, CN From: Charles Riley Reply-To: Charles Riley To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCIE Lab - I have seen he future and it is [7:62776] Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 22:19:54 GMT Chuck, Your post reminds me of those weird little ice cream stands that I sometimes see at the mall and various carnivals. It's called something like Dipping Dots - The Ice Cream of the Future. The initial human instinct is much like the Cro-Magnon humanoids encountering the monolith at the beginning of 2001: A Space Odyssey (sp): jump up and down with excitement until you realize it's just freeze dried ice cream. Rounding out that analogy, the CCIE of the future will probably be reduced to being the CCNP of today. Regardless, I have spent too much time and money to abandon the quest for CCIE now, but frankly, if I hadn't invested as much as I have, I would most likely abandon the quest in favor of broadening into other areas. I really don't see much market value for the CCIE anymore, especially with Cisco hellbent on making it a meatgrinding cash cow. Your java console and one way only to configure experience kind of bears this out. Sorry for the depressing post, just wanted to share. Charles The Long and Winding Road wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Been spending this weekend on what was once the Cisco Advanced SE Training ( ASET ) set of labs. These are available for those whose Cisco account team approves - there are a few conditions which can be found in the wee places of certification training. The program is run by Lab Gear ( the only link I have is www.labgear.net, but this is a login page ) There are a number of labs of CCIE level, look, and feel. Supposed to be real equipment, but the access is via java script windows, not terminal emulation. This makes for some interesting situations. The windows show or provide output only when they are active. So if you had two router sessions open, and you made changes on one router that would generate systems messages of one sort or another you would not see those messages on the other. also, I have yet to find a way to generate output from debugging commands. Things like term mon and logging of one kind or another have not been successful. so no debug ip routing and debug ip ospf adj. As with the real lab, there are a series of tasks to be completed. Grading is done via a script. This is the point of most interest. Actually, I suspect a lot of the current CCIE Lab grading is done using scripting tools. I believe the proctors still physically examine equipment configurations for some things, but I could be wrong. It is of interest because to judge from the script outputs I am seeing, there appears to be an assumption that there is one and only one way to do things. I'm not sure this is always true. I am not sure that this results in an entirely accurate grade. But more importantly, given my experience with the java consoles and the manner in which these labs must be done, I am not sure I like where this is headed. Something Brian Dennis and Brad Ellis and some other people started talking about back when the CCIE Lab went from two days to one - something about the longer term goal being to do the test remotely, and having people show up at Sylvan or some other testing center and log in remotely. If the Lab Gear approach is any indication, this is not ready for real live testing. I experienced far too many problems with terminal ( javascript ) sessions disconnecting mysteriously. With 8 open windows, it sometimes got to be very hard to find the session ( router ) I was looking for. Cut and paste is a real pain. You have to open a scratchpad window, which is associated with the javascript console window. cutting and pasting is done to this wind. there are scratchpad windows associated with each java wind, so if you had a scratchpad open for every router session, that makes for a LOT of junk to fight your way through looking for what you want. then there is the problem of actually moving what you want to copy and paste. highlight and control c control v or alt e paste don't work. you have to click on buttons on the java consoles to copy to and from routers. beyond that, there is the problems of whether or not the script answer is the right answer. For example, in one lab, a particular instruction requires that the rip routers on a particular segment have to use the neighbor statement to see eachother ( and prevent other routers on that segment from joining into the RIP domain ) well, the problem is, one of those routers is connected to another RIP router via a different interface. need a neighbor statement there too, but the script does not cover this, nor does th
Implications of using the clns router isis cmd - Any?? [7:62694]
Hello,Are there any implications of using the clns routing and clns router isis cmd. when configuring isis? I know this is not needed and only used for clns routing but I see numerous examples on CCO where they have used this cmd. Does not hurt but in terms of the Lab, will I lose points if I configure them knowing that things work without this cmd anyways?Why would I need it then?Thank you.Sincerely,CN The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62694t=62694 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast helper-map example - any? [7:62690]
Hello,Is there a way to simulate a multicast helper-map example with Cisco routers (kind of an obvious stupid question) but thought I might try :-)I know how to configure it on the appropriate routers but is there a way to test??Thank you.Sincerely,CN MSN 8 helps ELIMINATE E-MAIL VIRUSES. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62690t=62690 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distribute-list out in ISIS - NOT working!!....Why?? [7:62641]
Hello,I am trying to use a distribute-list out serial 1 in isis...basically blocking an Ospf route from being leaked into the Isis domain. It lets me type in the commands but when I do a show run, the commands are not there!! Why??On the neighboring isis router, I do not even get an option to set the distribute-list in??Now I know, in Ospf the distribute-list out does not work but did not know about this in Isis?Can anyone shed light on this? I had to use a redistribute connected with a route-map option.Here is my config:R3-B(config)#router isis R3-B(config-router)#distribute-list 51 out serial 1 R3-B(config-router)#endR3-B#rbr router isis redistribute connected metric 3 route-map serial level-1 redistribute rip metric 3 level-1 net 00...0003.00 is-type level-1 Thank you.Sincerely,CN Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62641t=62641 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Distribute-list out in ISIS - NOT working!!....Why?? [7:62661]
Now we're talking!! Thank you very much for your help, Mike. From: Mike Bernico Reply-To: Mike Bernico To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Distribute-list out in ISIS - NOT working!!Why?? [7:62648] Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:16:54 GMT In ISIS you can only filter routes at 1. redistribution or 2. l1/l2 connections. You can't filter routes between two L1 routers. You prob shouldn't be able to type the command if it doesn't work, but such is IOS. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Distribute-list out in ISIS - NOT working!!Why?? [7:62641] Hello,I am trying to use a distribute-list out serial 1 in isis...basically blocking an Ospf route from being leaked into the Isis domain. It lets me type in the commands but when I do a show run, the commands are not there!! Why??On the neighboring isis router, I do not even get an option to set the distribute-list in??Now I know, in Ospf the distribute-list out does not work but did not know about this in Isis?Can anyone shed light on this? I had to use a redistribute connected with a route-map option.Here is my config:R3-B(config)#router isis R3-B(config-router)#distribute-list 51 out serial 1 R3-B(config-router)#endR3-B#rbr router isis redistribute connected metric 3 route-map serial level-1 redistribute rip metric 3 level-1 net 00...0003.00 is-type level-1 Thank you.Sincerely,CN Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62661t=62661 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]
Hello, Is DVMRP covered at all in the new CCIE Lab? Any other new/odd topics? Ex. MRM or PGM?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62585t=62585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585]
Ooops!! It should be my pant ;- I did not mean anyone to violate the dreaded NDA. My question should have read: is DVMRP a part of the CCIE topics for the Lab? The reason is that I see a lot of DVMRP material in the cmd. and config. guide but not on other topics MOSPF etc. I guess, then I will have to cover it in my studies for the Lab. Thank you, George for clarifying that!!! Sincerely, CN From: Kaminski, Shawn G Reply-To: Kaminski, Shawn G To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585] Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:26:04 GMT Uh oh. Someone on this list probably pooped their pants after reading CN's message because of the NDA. :-) Probably the most you'll get out of anyone is that it is possible that DVMRP is covered in the new CCIE lab because anything is fair game. Since the Cisco IOS software supports PIM-to-DVMRP interaction, there is a chance you'll see it depending on the lab you get. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DVMRP in the CCIE Lab - ??? [7:62585] Hello, Is DVMRP covered at all in the new CCIE Lab? Any other new/odd topics? Ex. MRM or PGM?? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62597t=62585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specifying networks in OSPF - How? [7:62463]
Hello, Is there a rule of thumb on specifying the network commands in an Ospf FR topology? Ex. for netw. 10.10.10.1/24, would one specify under ospf: #router ospf 1 #netw 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 OR #router ospf 1 #netw 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 Which one?? Is the network specified or the host address itself. Does it depend if it's a frame-relay full-mesh (ip ospf network broadcast/non-broadcast) or partial-mesh (ip ospf network point-to-multipoint) ? Thank you. Sincerely, CN _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62463t=62463 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
