Re: [slim] Fast forward/rewind on duet, with latest firmware and 7.1

2008-08-29 Thread andyg

Pretty sure WMA seeking is disabled in the UI in 7.2.  WMA is such a
crappy format that seeking is actually a lot more difficult that you
would think.  I tried to implement it once but had to give up.  Hope to
be able to do it at some point though.


-- 
andyg

andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51542

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/rewind on duet, with latest firmware and 7.1

2008-08-28 Thread aporret

Andy,

Thanks for this clear answer.

Shouldn't it be clearly stated in some documentation then? And the
functionality disabled in the UI. The current behavior is quite
erratic...

Also: What formats are actually supported, then? The information
available is quite sketchy and conflictual. Is there a plan to support
WMA seek is in the reasonably near term?

-- Alain.

andyg;333041 Wrote: 
 Seeking in WMA is not supported, sorry.


-- 
aporret

aporret's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19589
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51542

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Fast forward/rewind on duet, with latest firmware and 7.1

2008-08-27 Thread aporret

I recently installed a duet and two servers, one running on a ReadyNAS
NV+, the other on a vista PC (both show the same behavior). Brand new
install of 7.1, with the controller firmware updated to the latest.

I am using WMA VBR (about 130kbps) files.

Whatever I do, I cannot move inside a track using fast forward/backward
buttons. Moreover, there is no (real) documentation anywhere of how it
is supposed to work! Some thread refer to an old way of scanning, going
2x, 4x, 8x the speed, but the latest version seems to work completely
differently on the controller (you can apparently use the wheel to move
inside the track).

In my case, I press FF on the controller, and hold it until the Song
position windows appears, with a slider for the current position. If I
continue holding it, nothing happens. If I release the button, and press
it again, the slider moves (although the track continues to play without
interruption). When I release the FF button, the player would skip to
the beginning of the next track. If I move again within the track (FW
or RW), it will skip to the beginning of another track... And the time
counter get screwed from time to time (showing negative time position,
etc...).

According to the FAQ #5995, seeking within a track is supported for
WMA CBR and WMA VBR... According to the bug tracker entries, the
seek function seems just not to work. Plenty of other people reported
the same or similar issues. Which is it?

Frankly, not supporting correctly such a basic functionality is quite
unacceptable (any dirty cheap portable MP3 player can do that properly;
no excuses!).


-- 
aporret

aporret's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=19589
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51542

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/rewind on duet, with latest firmware and 7.1

2008-08-27 Thread Brian Ritchie

When the Song Position display appears, let go of the FF/RW button and
use the scroll wheel to change the track position. That's how it works
for me (using the vanilla 7.1 release). Considerably better than the
old 2-4-8x speedup, which I could never get to work properly.

I think I read the instructions either in the Release Notes for 7.1 or
in something that was linked from them.  I wonder how many more UI
tricks I'm missing; must have a good rummage through the wiki again
sometime...

-- Brian


-- 
Brian Ritchie

Brian Ritchie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2319
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=51542

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-04-17 Thread Wirrunna

I was programming my Logitech Harmony Remote for a new DVD player when I
remembered this thread.

Slim Devices is now a Logitech company, how about replacing the Slim
Remote with a Harmony 525 (or similar) pre programmed for SC, modify SC
to respond to a third remote, (JVC, Classic Slim and now Harmony) and
add FF RW etc in SC to work like a VCR now that the full complement of 
|   |  buttons are available.

The marketing guys could wax lyrical about reducing the number of
remotes while increasing the integration of SC into the home
entertainment area, the production guys would have one less orphan
remote to make and the programmers would have a bunch more programmable
soft keys and best of all the humble user would (unless he/she has
already done so) have one less single device remote cluttering up the
lounge.


-- 
Wirrunna

A camel is a racehorse designed by a committee.

Wirrunna's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3225
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-04-15 Thread getprogs

Cheers,
Even though I am not using transcoded audio (WMA was implemented in HW
in some 6.x release, cant really remember when) FF/RW does not work for
WMA.

I would prefer any sort of functionality than the none-at-all that I
currently have, so looking into this is a very welcome suggestion! And
without sounding too much like a brown-noser I think it is fantastic to
have a developer discussing this with the entire community - not
something I am used to (yes, you are right - I am using Microsoft
products ;-)

So: Listen with caution to both sides of the story (both the ones
telling you the functionality is stupid/idiotic/whatever and the one
telling you it is fantastic) and keep up the good work!


-- 
getprogs

getprogs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=753
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-04-15 Thread Ben Sandee
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:51 PM, getprogs 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Cheers,
 Even though I am not using transcoded audio (WMA was implemented in HW
 in some 6.x release, cant really remember when) FF/RW does not work for
 WMA.


Are you using WMA-lossless?  This is not supported in the firmware and
requires transcoding, AFAIK.

Ben
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-04-14 Thread Phil Meyer
Is this circle-jerk ever going to end and see Fast-Forward and Rewind
implemented for the Squeezebox?  It takes all of a second for anyone
familiar with other audio equipment to realize that functionality is
completely missing.

Existing functionality works fine for me; in fact I found it extremely useful 
rather than a play thing, and quite similar to other audio equipment and some 
software apps.

What is being proposed is a change to the functionality, not to implement 
missing functionality.  If you find that fast-forward is currently completely 
missing, maybe you are using transcoded audio (the change doesn't fix that)?

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-04-01 Thread Mark Lanctot

MelonMonkey;285941 Wrote: 
 I'm not sure what foul language Mike was talking about

MelonMonkey;285757 Wrote: 
 Is this circle-jerk ever going to end

It's a pretty obscene connotation and shows a lack of respect for the
developers.

Also, why not talk about what is desired BEFORE the feature is
implemented?  Get it right before releasing it?  You think there's a
lot of talk about it now, what would it be like if it was released and
didn't meet the needs of the users?

Best get your ideas in right now...in a more constructive way.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-31 Thread Mark Lanctot

max.spicer;283375 Wrote: 
 I don't like the audio feedback, but that's mainly due to how it's
 implemented.  Audio feedback is a good thing and many devices do it
 much better.  The current method basically sounds like a skipping cd,
 which is horrible.  I've used devices that do this much better, but
 can't remember how they do it right now, or which devices!

One thing which would help is to reduce the volume from full during
scan.  See this very, very old bug:

http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=39


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-31 Thread MelonMonkey

Is this circle-jerk ever going to end and see Fast-Forward and Rewind
implemented for the Squeezebox?  It takes all of a second for anyone
familiar with other audio equipment to realize that functionality is
completely missing.

The design goal is pretty straight forward, so I don't understand how
so much time can be wasted talking about it when it can better be spent
on the engineering to achieve that goal.

Single press of FWD or REW buttons - skips to Next or Previous tracks. 
(We have this now)
Long-Press (press and hold) of FWD or REW - Fast-Forwards or Rewinds
through current track. (This still needs to be implemented)

That's the basic functional premise and user-interaction. The only
other design elements are visual presentation and audible presentation,
neither of which actually change the basic design and functionality.

Once the functionality has been engineered (it should be done in such a
way as to not disallow the playback of partial audio), the presentation
design can be decided and possibly spread over a number of options.
Such as auditory feedback on/off (some CD players for instance let you
hear accelerated audio while others don't), temporarily replace display
with large-format progress bar so you can clearly see where you are in
the song, etc.


-- 
MelonMonkey

Bruno
*'Twisted Melon - Fine Mac OS Software' (http://twistedmelon.com) |
'mira - Personal Control for your Apple Remote'
(http://twistedmelon.com)*

MelonMonkey's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8466
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-31 Thread cliveb

Overall I like awy's proposal, but have a suggestion for an additional
feature. When in scanner mode, it would be useful to be able to enter a
time offset into the track using the numeric keypad on the remote. I
used to have a CD player that allowed for this, and it was the most
efficient way to get to a certain known place.

Of course, on the Controller there is no numeric keypad (or up  down
keys), so I'm assuming that when in scanner mode using the SBC, the
wheel would be used to select the position within the track.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-31 Thread mvalera

Melon,

Please have a little patience, messing with FF/RW was never going to be
a part of the 7.0 release, and that just came out a few weeks ago. This
thread is part of the developers specing out what is going to happen
down the line for a future release.

Also please watch you language, your last post was flagged by several
users for foul language. I don't want to close the thread.

Thanks,

Mike


-- 
mvalera

Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Systems
slimdevices.com

mvalera's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11086
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-31 Thread JJZolx

MelonMonkey;285757 Wrote: 
 The design goal is pretty straight forward, so I don't understand how so
 much time can be wasted talking about it when it can better be spent on
 the engineering to achieve that goal.

You must be new.  This is nothing compared to 
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112

It's like a 15 page proposal to change a light bulb.

;-)


-- 
JJZolx

Jim

JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-31 Thread MelonMonkey

Not new, I just want to see the idea get some traction. It's pointless
to keep discussing the same thing over and over when there has already
been (in this or other threads) a consensus of what needs to be done.

I'm not sure what foul language Mike was talking about nor why he seems
to think I mentioned anything about SC7. Maybe I'm frustrated that
despite numerous emails through official customer support channels not
one reply has ever arrived...  Maybe the customer support staff are out
buying dictionaries to check everyone's language use. Better get
different languages/regions because not everyone here is from the
Southern US.

I'm of course blown away that this wasn't made a priority to be
included sometime before SS4, but that's another story. I was going to
make the lightbulb analogy originally but didn't want to go there. ;)


-- 
MelonMonkey

Bruno
*'Twisted Melon - Fine Mac OS Software' (http://twistedmelon.com) |
'mira - Personal Control for your Apple Remote'
(http://twistedmelon.com)*

MelonMonkey's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8466
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-25 Thread awy

Here is a revised proposal based upon some of the feedback received and
the experience of playing around with the implementation.

PROPOSAL:


-  Press-and-hold  (FWD) or  (REW) to enter Scanner. The
  scanner is a modified version of kdf's Song Scanner plugin. It
  displays an input bar (as used for volume, etc.) on line 2 of the
  display and counters indicating current position and length of the
  current track. Once in scanner:
-  The track position counter and input bar track the current
  position in the track, so long as the UP or DOWN keys have not been
  used. The track continues to play.
-  Press UP/DOWN to go forward and back in the track position. The
  track position counter and input bar track the selected position. The
  unit of increment is a minimum of 1s, maximum of 5s. Tracks with 100s
  = length = 500s are divided into 100 steps. Progressive
  acceleration of the scrolling, when the UP or DOWN key is held, makes
  it practical to seek to a position in tracks of varying lengths,
  including (at least) up to an hour.
-  After using UP/DOWN, no further change for between 1-2s will
  automatically jump to the selected position and remain in the
  scanner.
-  Press FWD to enter 2X fast-forward mode. Repeated presses will
  successively double the scanning speed. Similarly with REW for rewind
  modes. The fast-forward/rewind mode and rate is indicated next to the
  position counters. UP/DOWN scrolling can still be used.
-  Press PLAY to resume normal PLAY and exit the scanner. Any
  fast-forward/rewind mode is stopped and play continues from the
  current position. Any pending position change from use of the UP/DOWN
  keys is invoked.
-  Press LEFT to exit scanner without applying any pending change.
  Any fast-forward/rewind mode remains operational.
-  The scanner will exit when the screen-saver kicks in or any other
  display mode is invoked.
  

Currently fast-forward/rewind modes continue across track boundaries in
the current playlist. Is this really useful? It seems to me that it
would be better if play would stop when either end of the track is
reached.

This revised proposal keeps the audio feedback. There has been some
support for this although I remain to be convinced that it is really
useful. I will look for feedback once the new scanner version
(described above) is available.

I would be pleased to get feedback on these revised proposals and
additional or alternative suggestions.

Alan.


-- 
awy

awy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7480
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-25 Thread max . spicer

It sounds to me as if you are needlessly mixing the scanner mode and
accelerated playback modes.  I think it would be much better if they
were entirely separate.  During playback, single presses of ffwd/rwd
should trigger accelerated playback.  Holding ffwd/rew when there is a
current track (but not necessarily playing) should enter the scanner
mode.

 Press UP/DOWN to go forward and back in the track position.

Pressing Up/Down to move forward/back is somewhat counter-intuitive. 
Does left always have to exit a mode in the Squeezebox UI, or are there
already some instances where this is not the case?  Given that you enter
scanner mode by holding ffwd/rew, it might make sense if during scanner
mode you could use single presses of ffwd/rew to move the current
position right/left.  This would only be possible if the two modes were
completely separate, as above.

 After using UP/DOWN, no further change for between 1-2s will
 automatically jump to the selected position and remain in the scanner.

I can't decide whether I like this behaviour or not - I'd have to try
it.  My Humax PVR has a very similar scanner mode but it doesn't have
the timeout.  I'm trying to think if any other devices do similar.  

 Press FWD to enter 2X fast-forward mode. Repeated presses will
 successively double the scanning speed. Similarly with REW for rewind
 modes. The fast-forward/rewind mode and rate is indicated next to the
 position counters. UP/DOWN scrolling can still be used.

I don't think this makes sense when in scanner mode, but fully agree
for playback mode.  What happens when you reach maximum speed?  Does it
cycle back to slow speed?  Does the cycle first go to 1x?  What does the
pause button do?

 Press PLAY to resume normal PLAY and exit the scanner. Any
 fast-forward/rewind mode is stopped and play continues from the current
 position. Any pending position change from use of the UP/DOWN keys is
 invoked.

Does it make sense to be in scanner mode whilst ffwd/rewind is in
effect, or would it be better to have scanner mode cancel ffwd/rewind? 
I'm not sure.  Otherwise, good.

 Press LEFT to exit scanner without applying any pending change. Any
 fast-forward/rewind mode remains operational.

See above.

 The scanner will exit when the screen-saver kicks in or any other
 display mode is invoked.

Good.

 Currently fast-forward/rewind modes continue across track boundaries in
 the current playlist. Is this really useful? It seems to me that it
 would be better if play would stop when either end of the track is
 reached.

Agreed.

 This revised proposal keeps the audio feedback. There has been some
 support for this although I remain to be convinced that it is really
 useful. I will look for feedback once the new scanner version
 (described above) is available.

I don't like the audio feedback, but that's mainly due to how it's
implemented.  Audio feedback is a good thing and many devices do it
much better.  The current method basically sounds like a skipping cd,
which is horrible.  I've used devices that do this much better, but
can't remember how they do it right now, or which devices!

Hope that's helpful!

Max


-- 
max.spicer

What do we want?  Smoother Analog VU with FLAC!
When do we want it?  At the soonest possible convenience to the
hard-working yet undervalued Slim Developers.  ;-)

max.spicer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=23
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-25 Thread awy

max.spicer;283375 Wrote: 
 It sounds to me as if you are needlessly mixing the scanner mode and
 accelerated playback modes.  I think it would be much better if they
 were entirely separate. 

Thanks Max.

The original proposal was simply to get rid of the accelerated playback
modes. There has been quit a lot of support for that and some dissent.
The revised proposal keeps the accelerated playback.

Yes, this does mix the two modes but I suggest that this is not
needless. On the contrary both the scanner and accelerated playback
modes are tools to solve the same problem - get from -here- to -there-
within a playing track. This new design puts them both in the same UI
and makes it easy to use either or both.

 During playback, single presses of ffwd/rwd should trigger accelerated
 playback.  Holding ffwd/rew when there is a current track (but not
 necessarily playing) should enter the scanner mode.

There is no FFWD button, only a FWD button. During playback, this has
the function to skip to the next track. I do not propose to change
this.

Press FWD to enter 2X fast-forward mode. Repeated presses will
  successively double the scanning speed. Similarly with REW for rewind
  modes. The fast-forward/rewind mode and rate is indicated next to the
  position counters. UP/DOWN scrolling can still be used.  I don't think 
  this makes sense when in scanner mode, but fully agree
 for playback mode. What happens when you reach maximum speed? Does it
 cycle back to slow speed? Does the cycle first go to 1x? What does the
 pause button do?

Entering scanner mode starts at 1X (that is, normal play). At maximum
rate (256X/-256X) further presses have no effect. This is the same as
the current accelerated playback functionality.

I'm not sure what the PAUSE button does. I think that it should do
Pause/Unpause, with Unpause always being at normal speed.

I agree about the UP/DOWN vs. LEFT/RIGHT thing.  It would probably be
possible to change but I don't think that it is a sufficiently big
deal.

Alan.


-- 
awy

awy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7480
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-25 Thread slimkid

hi awy,

I like your proposal, well thought of, well rounded.

The only thing, about left/right vs up/down buttons. Are you planning
on making it available in .map file? That way anybody can adjust it to
their liking On SB it's common to use left/right buttons to traverse up
and down the menu structure, so up/down buttons make sense for scanner.
For example I'd expect that left arrow takes me back up the hierarchy
or jump back where I started from.

thks.

K


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iAj2aPdQnk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvMNuuFSvN0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDRhRv4q_SI
http://youtube.com/watch?v=nlrpe8Ig5m8
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dC9tGlwPln8

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-15 Thread arainert

How do I just skip to the next/previous song?

a


-- 
arainert

arainert's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16091
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-13 Thread awy

dickmc;278956 Wrote: 
 
 1. Display the elapsed time of a song (minutes:seconds) on the player
 window in Slimserver. (I've always missed this.)
 

It does (in SC 7).

 
 2. When the  or  is clicked display the resulting speed and
 direction such as: 2X   8X and show the resulting elapsed time as the
 scan progresses.
 
 3. When not scanning blank out the 2x type indicator.

Do you mean on the WebUI or the player display? On the player display
that it pretty much what you get already.


-- 
awy

awy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7480
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-13 Thread dickmc

Do you mean on the WebUI or the player display? On the player display
that it pretty much what you get already.

On both the web interface and on the player. I am running 6.5. If 7
does this, I guess I have another reason for upgrading when it is
stable. :-)


-- 
dickmc

Dick
_
Squeezebox2 on wired LAN:  -Hosfelt linear pwr and DAC audio out mods
-
Sansui QRX9001 quad:   -Resoldered and recaped incl BlackGates in audio
path-
Onkyo T-4711 tuner
Sherwood Newcastle CD-980T 
Four Axiom M22ti

dickmc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4025
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-12 Thread Cobra2

I really hate the FF/RW function...It is the most useless feture when
playing my music-collection. (most Flac).
And the DVD speed-x-factor adding x times with each push, is confusing.

I would rather have CD-type FF, even with AM quality(32-64+kbs)
sound...

Arne K


-- 
Cobra2

Cobra2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14019
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-12 Thread slimkid

awy;276929 Wrote: 
 No, no decisions yet. I am thinking hard about the practicality or
 retaining the audio feedback, where possible. The current mechanism
 really is horrible but I can see that it has some use and there is
 clearly some support for it.
 
 The 'press centre button to enter scan/select mode' sound interesting.
 Any further comments on this?
 
 Alan.

hi,

Any consideration given to 'track scan' plugin type solution, just
implementing it in a way that would jump to it and then get back to
where the screen was before the action?

thks,

K


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iAj2aPdQnk or 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvMNuuFSvN0
or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDRhRv4q_SI

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-12 Thread dickmc

I don't mind the current design that bad, but find it finicky to use. I
do like the audio feedback.

I suggest the following:

1. Display the elapsed time of a song (minutes:seconds) on the player
window in Slimserver. (I've always missed this.)

2. When the  or  is clicked display the resulting speed and
direction such as: 2X   8X and show the resulting elapsed time as the
scan progresses.

3. When not scanning blank out the 2x type indicator.

Thanks


-- 
dickmc

Dick
_
Squeezebox2 on wired LAN:  -Hosfelt linear pwr and DAC audio out mods
-
Sansui QRX9001 quad:   -Resoldered and recaped incl BlackGates in audio
path-
Onkyo T-4711 tuner
Sherwood Newcastle CD-980T 
Four Axiom M22ti

dickmc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4025
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-11 Thread amey01

Any way to move back and forward in a track would get my vote!! I'm
actually in two minds whether audio feedback is useful or not - I
personally don't care whether audio feedback is available or not. Even
a system where you could type in a time as a GoTo field would be
fantastic!!


-- 
amey01

amey01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11274
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-08 Thread getprogs

But any FF/RW functionality that is usable with WMA files gets my vote!
I have votet for the bug regarding the inability to scroll through
transcoded files, but just want to add my 5C worth here as well (4
then? 3? 2...?)
I do not care about changing the way it works, I mean even having the
ability is a major step up for me :-) (the alternative is to re-rip my
+800 CDs, but then I would have to get them from remote storage first
etc. etc.)

Apart from that: Still love the product, haven't found anything as good
yet! (well - not for the price at least, although a transporter would be
a nice addition to the stereo setup ;-)


-- 
getprogs

getprogs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=753
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-08 Thread awy

No, no decisions yet. I am thinking hard about the practicality or
retaining the audio feedback, where possible. The current mechanism
really is horrible but I can see that it has some use and there is
clearly some support for it.

The 'press centre button to enter scan/select mode' sound interesting.
Any further comments on this?

Alan.


-- 
awy

awy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7480
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-07 Thread Jeff Flowerday

Have any decisions been made on this?

I'd prefer silent with a progress bar as well.  All my files need to be
transcoded so I'm biased.

But as the above poster says if I have use timeline that would work for
me as well.  Just need some way to move around transcoded files.


Thanks,
Jeff


-- 
Jeff Flowerday

Jeff Flowerday's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15883
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-07 Thread kdf

 Have any decisions been made on this?

nothing public. I supposed awy could answer this if he's not busy with
everything else.

 I'd prefer silent with a progress bar as well.  All my files need to be
 transcoded so I'm biased.

You are still out of luck with the current implementation.  A progress bar
is still only a GUI.  The goToTime() function is the real workhorse in the
current implementation and in the SongScanner plugin on which the new
proposed UI is based.  gotoTime() cannot jump through any transcoded
stream.

It would require a new api, common to all transcoding applications that
allows resetting the stream pointer.

-kdf

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-07 Thread smc2911

Phil Meyer;251074 Wrote: 
 The iPod also has two mechanisms for seeking through a song.
 1. Press and hold  to fast-forward with audio feedback.
 2. Press the middle circular button to go to a song progress bar.  The
 wheel is then used to set a specific position within the song.  The
 music plays at normal speed whilst you are selecting a new playback
 position (whilst the user continues to move finger around the wheel). 
 When the user stops moving for a second or so, playback will
 automatically resume at that position.Now that we have the SBC with a wheel, 
 I'd love to see 2 implemented, in
addition to retaining the current FF/REW functionality (or some variant
thereof).


-- 
smc2911

smc2911's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4388
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-07 Thread Jeff Flowerday

kdf;276728 Wrote: 
 
  Have any decisions been made on this?
 
 nothing public. I supposed awy could answer this if he's not busy with
 everything else.
 
  I'd prefer silent with a progress bar as well.  All my files need to
 be
  transcoded so I'm biased.
 
 You are still out of luck with the current implementation.  A progress
 bar
 is still only a GUI.  The goToTime() function is the real workhorse in
 the
 current implementation and in the SongScanner plugin on which the new
 proposed UI is based.  gotoTime() cannot jump through any transcoded
 stream.
 
 It would require a new api, common to all transcoding applications
 that
 allows resetting the stream pointer.
 
 -kdf


That's too bad.

Thanks,
Jeff


-- 
Jeff Flowerday

Jeff Flowerday's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15883
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-03-02 Thread muvster

The one thing I really miss at the moment is the ability to jump around
in transcoded material by clicking in the SqueezeCenter track timeline
(like I can for native streams). Whatever changes are made to FF/REW
functionality, I'd be very happy if only support for that was added.

I agree that the current FF/REW functionality is a bit awkward, mostly
because of the dual skip/scan functions of the remote control buttons
and the stop-start audio feedback. But I'd be more than happy to use
Song Scanner for my scanning needs, as long as I get to jump through
transcoded tracks.


Thanks for a wonderful product by the way (I'm a new SB3 owner). I
haven't been this excited about a piece of technology since I don't
know when.


-- 
muvster

muvster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15799
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2008-02-29 Thread devaneyk

this is an excellent idea. I think the current FF/REW is the poorest
part of the system. On my SB3 the loud cracking and jumping that often
happens makes it virtually unusable. I would agree with the audio mute
feature as this would prevent this. Keeping it simple and reliable with
just the progress bar would be great.


-- 
devaneyk

devaneyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13624
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Phil Meyer
If there were the first rule of coding, then, I'd imagine it would be -
the code has to do something useful and purposeful, preferably what the
paying side asked for.

That's not a rule of coding - that's the role of requirements capture and 
design :-)

Good that this thread was started (kudos to the idea that the client is
ultimate target of the product and keep it simple - ask them - what is
that they really want).
Yes, I agree that it is good to ask in the forum how the community want 
functionality to work.  However, that is not going to capture a large 
proportion of the user base, and only forum readers who have a problem with the 
current functionality will respond.  How many users are there that don't read 
the forum, and how many users actually like the current functionality?  So far 
there have been 8-10 replies, some of which agree that new functionality (or 
the proposed removal of functionality) should be optional.

I too find the current solution rather useless,
partially because of the fact that it's not consistent - SB does not
react to the remote same way all the time; an then, pressing the play
is hit and miss.

I'm not sure what problem you have - but sounds like this is nothing to do with 
FF functionality.  What is not consistent?  SB reacts to the remote the same 
way all the time for me - what varies for you? Sounds like you have dead 
batteries, if pressing play is hit and miss.

Since I have discovered song scanner, I don't think I ever used the original 
way to FF.
That is a good useful plugin, but I still find the standard FF functionality 
more useful, most of the time.

I think that just integrating the song scanner, so that it is easier to access 
would be big step in
the right direction. Because, the only drawback to it is the fact that
it takes too many key strokes to get.

This is already possible by creating a custom key map file.  You can call up 
the song scanner from any chosen button (overriding FF.hold if you desire).  I 
have changed play.hold on the now playing screen to take me directly into the 
song scanner.

I think the Song Scanner could be made a standard plugin (released and 
supported with SqueezeCenter) to sit alongside the current functionality.  My 
vote would be for play.hold to be used to invoke the seek progress bar.  The 
SavePlaylist plugin currently uses play.hold to get into that plugin, but I 
think Song Scanner would be a better use for the button.  How often do people 
want to save the playlist?

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Phil Meyer
How would you feel about DVR-like behavior? Press Fwd once and you jump
~30 seconds ahead (rough computation based on file size if not natively
supported format?), pres Rew once and you jump ~10 seconds back. The UI
should let users choose different Fwd and Rew jump amounts.

That would be even worse.

Perhaps even better -- momentary presses would have that DVR-like
behavior, and held presses would have Alan's proposed behavior.

The problem is the FF key will skip to next track if pressed briefly.  The key 
must be held down to invoke some form of fast-forward behaviour.

I don't like having to hold down the button for long periods of time.  Uses the 
battery power up, and would be less secure than current functionality.

I press.hold to start fast-forward, and then release the button.  I press.hold 
FF again to ramp-up the speed.  When I hear a change in the music (eg. the end 
of a long gap, crowd-noise between live songs, I press play to resume normal 
playback.  Nothing confusing or difficult about that, and totally practical.

I compare the current fast-forward functionality to my Sky+ box for digital TV 
control, which is considered by many to be the best and most user-friendly PVR 
on the market.  With that box, you press .  This takes you into x2 playback 
speed.  Press it again and you go to x5, then x15 and x30.  Press play to 
resume playback.  Exactly the same, except the SqueezeBox remote doesn't have a 
dedicated button, so you have to press FF.hold each time to go up to the next 
multiplier level.  I can't imagine how bad it would feel if someone took away 
visual feedback from the Sky+ box and just provided a progress bar or an 
arbitrary jump n seconds into the future.

I use my Squeezeboxes and a RadioShark AM/FM capture device to time
shift radio programs. Often I have to stop playing a program mid-way.
I use SongScanner to resume playback in these cases (I'd like to have
something like MythTV's saved position functionality.)

Yes, that is kind of when I use the SongScanner; if I have stopped a long 
song/podcast and know what position I want to resume from.  However, there is 
also a bookmark plugin, that allows you to save the song and position as a 
bookmark, so you can instantly resume from that position.

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Phil Meyer
I'm probably to fast ;-)

Slow down and chill out then ;-)

i press  nothing happens or it goes silent
then a little later a sound snippet ? by then i've pressed play again.
Confused as ever. Now i get it, I'm not patient enough to let the
function kick in.

There would be no difference with the new proposed functionality - you would 
still have to learn how to hold a button down for long enough.  Longer in fact, 
because as soon as you release, it would stop fast-forwarding, so you better 
learn to have more patience :-)

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread ntom

Tend to agree with an earlier poster: need to be able to hear what you
are skipping for this to be useful.  Currently I find that the lack of
responsiveness is the biggest cause of frustration but I like being
able to skip forward or backwards in a track.  I agree if this is a
problem on transcoded data then drop the audio for this -but then I
only use FLAC  occasionally MP3!

I would like to see current situation where each FFWD press speeds it
up, but would be nice if FRWD stepped the speed back down so could
control speed.doesn't seem to do that now.


-- 
ntom

SB3, Perpetual Technologies P1-A / P3-A, Naim 82, 4 x Naim 135,
Magneplanar MG3a

ntom's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3197
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Phil Meyer
There is considerable dissatisfaction with the current implementation, 
although I suspect that it probably
meets the needs of some people just fine.

Can you recap what features of the current functionality users are dissatisfied 
with?  Maybe there's just a lack of information on how it works and people need 
some extra words in the documentation.

Are users actually saying that they don't like the sound made when 
fast-forwarding, or is that just an internal thing because Logitech want to 
make the software easier to understand?

Do users understand that they have to hold the FF button down?
Do users understand that they can release and hold again to go faster?
Do users understand that they have to press play to resume normal playback?

I'm trying to understand where the dissatisfaction is.

Let me start by recapping on the current functionality, as I understand
it.
From this statement it does sound like there's no written documentation. I 
can't find my original user manual.  I've looked in the Help-Remote Control 
Reference, and all it says is Press and hold FWD to scan forward through the 
current song.

Whilst that statement is not untrue, it doesn't really detail the whole 
functionality.  Your recap of the functionality was really good - and at least 
one user replying to this thread now undertands how it is meant to work.  I 
suggest that as part of the rework (if anything has to be done), you also 
consider writing some details into the help reference, and eventually it would 
be good if Logitech release a better user manual for new products.

There is considerable doubt about whether being able to hear the 1s
chunks of audio in these modes is actually of any use.

Really?  Where does the doubt come from?

I find it very useful, and I would find it useless without.  Most other 
playback devices have audio feedback - CD players and mp3 players.  Take for 
example the industry standard for mp3 playback devices - the iPod.  If you 
press and hold the  button on an iPod, it will fast forward, playing chuncks 
of audio in exactly the same way as the SqueezeBox fast-forward implementation.

Comparing to VCR/DVD/PVR devices, they all show a visual feedback when fast 
forwarding through video.  Video players often had two mechanisms too.  
Fast-forward when playing will give a visual feedback, so you know when to stop 
fast-forwarding through adverts, for example.  When stopped, fast-forward would 
go faster, showing a time position, so you can set playback at a particular 
point in time.

The iPod also has two mechanisms for seeking through a song.
1. Press and hold  to fast-forward with audio feedback.
2. Press the middle circular button to go to a song progress bar.  The wheel is 
then used to set a specific position within the song.  The music plays at 
normal speed whilst you are selecting a new playback position (whilst the user 
continues to move finger around the wheel).  When the user stops moving for a 
second or so, playback will automatically resume at that position.

To me, this is also how the Squeezebox should work by default out of the box, 
as a large user base would be most familiar with this functionality.

Your suggestion is like (1) and (2) above merged together, but in my opinion 
the audio feedback is crucial for this type of seeking, otherwise it's 
pointless.

The implementation (called trick-mode internally) is pretty inefficient
and somewhat hit-and-miss. Recent improvements have made it somewhat
more reliable
Seems to work flawlessly under SC7.0 beta for me, on both wireless players (SB2 
and Transporter) that I have.

I used to have a FF problem on my SB3, but to be honest I had loads of problems 
in general with wifi and the player rebooting, etc.  It needs to go back for 
repair.

The song scanner plugin in like (2) above, except that it by default it is 
awkward to navigate to, and return back to the now playing screen.  This could 
be improved.

The implementation also has the problem that it affects many different parts 
of the SC
software. It would be great to get rid of it.

True, but that's probably true for lots of other important bits of 
functionality - you can't just remove something because it hasn't been 
implemented well, and not replace it with something else.  Eg. many people have 
unreliable wifi problems, but that doesn't mean that wifi should be disabled on 
all players!


Can I suggest that you try to support both seeking methods, like an iPod does:

1. Press and hold FF to fast-forward through a song, similar to your 
suggestion, but with audio feedback.
2. Press and hold play to bring up a progress bar, where left/right buttons set 
the current playback position.  Automatically resume playback when left/right 
are not pressed any more, or press play to resume.


I suggest that the above could be the new default settings, but I would also 
like to see some configuration options to tweak the functionality (not sure 
whether the settings would be 

Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Phil Meyer
I would like to see current situation where each FFWD press speeds it
up, but would be nice if FRWD stepped the speed back down so could
control speed.doesn't seem to do that now.

The current functionality uses repeated press-and-hold FWD presses to speed up, 
use repeated REW presses to slow down or go backwards.  Press play at any time 
to resume playback instantly.

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread peterw

Phil Meyer;251058 Wrote: 
 
 Perhaps even better -- momentary presses would have that DVR-like
 behavior, and held presses would have Alan's proposed behavior.
 
 The problem is the FF key will skip to next track if pressed briefly. 
 The key must be held down to invoke some form of fast-forward
 behaviour.

Anybody have a good rock I can hide under?

Yeah, about the only time my even better suggestion would make *any*
sense would be if there was only one item in the playlist, which is the
case when I listen to most radio programs (but most of the time I have
normal music playlists, duh).

My even better might be another good plugin to write that would wrap
the Fwd/Rew keys and only change the behavior for single item playlists
-- JumpSkip, maybe, to continue my camel case naming? :-)

-Peter


-- 
peterw

http://www.tux.org/~peterw/
free plugins: http://www.tux.org/~peterw/#slim
AllQuiet BlankSaver BottleRocket FuzzyTime SaverSwitcher SleepFade
StatusFirst VolumeLock

peterw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2107
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Peter

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:50:58 +, Phil Meyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 I compare the current fast-forward functionality to my Sky+ box for
 digital TV control, which is considered by many to be the best and most
 user-friendly PVR on the market.  With that box, you press .  This
 takes you into x2 playback speed.  Press it again and you go to x5, then
 x15 and x30.  Press play to resume playback.  Exactly the same, except
 the SqueezeBox remote doesn't have a dedicated button, so you have to
 press FF.hold each time to go up to the next multiplier level.  I can't
 imagine how bad it would feel if someone took away visual feedback from
 the Sky+ box and just provided a progress bar or an arbitrary jump n
 seconds into the future.

Video is much different from audio in this respect. But I'd prefer a
timeline that I can move to any position of anyway. Like in Windows
mediaplayer or any other computer mediaplayer that I know of. None have
speed up play speed to move to a different location. 

Regards,
Peter
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Peter

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:00:41 +, Phil Meyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 I'm probably to fast ;-)
 
 Slow down and chill out then ;-)
 
 i press  nothing happens or it goes silent
 then a little later a sound snippet ? by then i've pressed play again.
 Confused as ever. Now i get it, I'm not patient enough to let the
 function kick in.
 
 There would be no difference with the new proposed functionality - you
 would still have to learn how to hold a button down for long enough. 
 Longer in fact, because as soon as you release, it would stop
 fast-forwarding, so you better learn to have more patience :-)

It's much like the way the volume up/down buttons work. Except now the
display bar indicates the location inside the current track.

Regards,
Peter
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Phil Meyer
It's much like the way the volume up/down buttons work. Except now the
display bar indicates the location inside the current track.

Not really.  Volume up/down is instant - as soon as you start to press the 
volume up key, it will start to raise the volume.  However, you'll still have 
to hold the FWD button down to fast-forward, as a short press would skip to the 
next track.

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread cbemoore

Phil Meyer;251058 Wrote: 
 The problem is the FF key will skip to next track if pressed briefly. 
 The key must be held down to invoke some form of fast-forward
 behaviour.

Here's a controversial suggestion, but the more I think about it the
more sense it seems to make. Why not reverse the current logic so that
a brief press of FF or RW increases or decreases the speed, and a long
press skips to the previous or next track?

This would be much more intuitive to me than the current behaviour. It
would also make it much easier to seek within a track, since you would
be able to control the 'seek' speed with brief presses instead of long
presses.

Anyone agree, or is it a stupid idea?

Chris


-- 
cbemoore

cbemoore's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=163
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Phil Meyer
Why not reverse the current logic so that
a brief press of FF or RW increases or decreases the speed, and a long
press skips to the previous or next track?

It did cross my mind too for a split second, as I often navigate through the 
now playing list to choose a song to skip to, rather than using the remote FWD 
key anyway.

However, that would be a rather radical change that would catch many users out 
unaware.  Perhaps an option could be added to swap the key actions.  There's no 
reason why the FF single and hold actions can't be reversed via a custom key 
map file either.

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread erland

cbemoore;251239 Wrote: 
 Here's a controversial suggestion, but the more I think about it the
 more sense it seems to make. Why not reverse the current logic so that
 a brief press of FF or RW increases or decreases the speed, and a long
 press skips to the previous or next track?
 
 This would be much more intuitive to me than the current behaviour. It
 would also make it much easier to seek within a track, since you would
 be able to control the 'seek' speed with brief presses instead of long
 presses.
 
 Anyone agree, or is it a stupid idea?
 
 Chris
Not stupid, but I still don't like it.
I've so far never used the fwd/rew functionality, but I regularly
choose to skip a track when something bad comes up in a random
playlist. Skipping track should be easy to access.

I think the main issues here is really that the remote misses some
buttons. Most remote controls for CD and DVD players have separate
buttons for fwd/rev and next/prev track, the SB uses the same buttons
which causes the user interface to be a bit strange.


-- 
erland

Erland Isaksson
'My homepage' (http://erland.homeip.net) 'My download page'
(http://erland.homeip.net/download)
(Developer of 'TrackStat, SQLPlayList, DynamicPlayList, Custom Browse,
Custom Scan,  Custom Skip, Multi Library and Database Query plugins'
(http://wiki.erland.homeip.net/index.php/Category:SlimServer))

erland's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3124
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-23 Thread Peter
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:07:14 -0800, cbemoore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 
 Phil Meyer;251058 Wrote: 
  The problem is the FF key will skip to next track if pressed briefly. 
  The key must be held down to invoke some form of fast-forward
  behaviour.
 
 Here's a controversial suggestion, but the more I think about it the
 more sense it seems to make. Why not reverse the current logic so that
 a brief press of FF or RW increases or decreases the speed, and a long
 press skips to the previous or next track?
 
 This would be much more intuitive to me than the current behaviour. It
 would also make it much easier to seek within a track, since you would
 be able to control the 'seek' speed with brief presses instead of long
 presses.
 
 Anyone agree, or is it a stupid idea?

Changing tracks *is* intuitive, I would suggest keeping that the way it
is.

Regards,
Peter
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread Phil Meyer
I read it but there doesn't seem to be anything that contradicts this 
solution. Alan suggests a 'silent' ffwd/rew, basically like you would 
lift the pickup from an old-fashioned record and place it somewhere 
else. No sound while moving, just a visual indicator should surely make 
this a lot easier.

I don't understand why taking something away like that can make the 
functionality easier.  If no audio indicator makes it easier for you, then 
why not just mute the sound before fast forwarding?

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread Phil Meyer
In fact, I'd just like to say thank you to everyone for all your hard
work. I'm running a nightly from 2 weeks ago on Vista. And it's working
perfectly, very stable and I'm loving all the improvements.

Here here.  I think SC7 is very good - very stable.  I can recommend upgrading.

However, please don't break the FF functionality ;-)
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread Phil Meyer
I agree that using a proportional bar would be much better than what we have 
now.
I disagree.

The way it works at the moment is better, because the user is in total control, 
deciding when to accelerate.  An automatic acceleration in fast-forward speed 
is unpredictable (esp. without audio feedback).  I guess it's the difference 
between a manual gearbox (transmission) and an automatic in a car.

My most frequent use for fast-forwarding is when I am listening to podcasts 
that I have downloaded and scanned into my music library.  For example, 
Coverville.  An episode of this podcast generally lasts 30mins to an hour.  
When I hear a bad song, I want to skip forward to the next.  With no audio 
feedback, I would not know when to stop fast-forwarding.  I'd have to look at 
the current playtime, fast-forward a bit, stop, listen and then fast-forward or 
rewind a bit. With an automatic acceleration in the FF/REW speed, this would be 
even worse.  The functionality would be totally useless.

I think some form of audio feedback is essential, and in my opinion expected by 
those who are not techically aware - those that are moving from CD playback.

I also use KDF's Scanner plugin, so I have the best of both worlds.  This is 
useful for long tracks, when I do know where I want to jump to, as it is 
quicker than fast-forwarding.  However, I think this is the less-likely 
scenario.  I can't think of many times when I have specifically needed to jump 
to a known position in a song, whereas I quite often want to skip over a 
passage in a track until the music changes (eg. a gap between the last song and 
a hidden track on a rip from CD).

I have no objection to making this new method an option, but I personally think 
the way it works now is better.  Give the user the option to decide what method 
suits them best, or leave the functionality as it is (because it works), and 
fix other issues that are more high profile.

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread Peter

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:37:55 +, Phil Meyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 I read it but there doesn't seem to be anything that contradicts this 
 solution. Alan suggests a 'silent' ffwd/rew, basically like you would 
 lift the pickup from an old-fashioned record and place it somewhere 
 else. No sound while moving, just a visual indicator should surely make 
 this a lot easier.
 
 I don't understand why taking something away like that can make the
 functionality easier.  If no audio indicator makes it easier for you,
 then why not just mute the sound before fast forwarding?

I read Sean's explanation (in the quoted thread) on why it's difficult
to do ff's perfectly. It seemed leaving out audio would make it easier
*for the developers* to do a ff in the way I'd like to see it. Reading
this thread I'm not the only one. I find the current method confusing
and - for me - useless. I'd have no objection against a configurable
ff-scheme, but I imagine that goes against the first rule of coding:
Keep it simple.

Regards,
Peter
 
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread Phil Meyer
For most (all?) formats we should be able to just seek proportionally
to the designated point in the _source_ file, and just re-start
transcoding from there.

Perhaps play audio feedback when playing non-transcoded, and don't play audio 
when playing transcoded files.

Display a progress bar when fast-forwarding or rewinding, but allow manual 
speed acceleration, as it is today.

I suggest a configuration setting:

FF/REW acceleration:
Manual
2 sec
5 sec
10 sec

where the acceleration time is the period of time that the button is held down 
before going up the next gear-change.

Manual would work like current functionality, where the speed increases after a 
FF button hold, but will not increase again until the user presses and holds FF 
again. Seeking will continue at the current multiplier rate until play is 
pressed to resume normal playback.

2, 5 or 10 sec acceleration would increase seek speed after the chosen period 
of time has elapsed whilst holding FF down.  If the button is released, seeking 
is stopped and the track will resume normal playback.


Another problem to consider with the new FF proposal that the infra red control 
may not be dependable.  If there's any interruption in signal, FF speed will be 
lost and the user would have to build-up to speed again.

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread Phil Meyer
I read Sean's explanation (in the quoted thread) on why it's difficult
to do ff's perfectly. It seemed leaving out audio would make it easier
*for the developers*

I can't see how rewriting the implementation would be easier than doing nothing 
;)

I find the current method confusing and - for me - useless.

I can't understand why anyone would find the current implementation confusing.  
It is after all how many DVD players work.  Seems quite logical to me, and 
there are audio and visual feedbacks as to what is happening too.

I've never needed to look up documentation to understand how it would work.  
Perhaps you could explain why it is confusing such that some documentation 
could be added to the Help-Remote Control Reference page?

Actually, I have another improvement suggestion that could be made to the 
current implementation to fit in with the suggested implementation.

At the moment, you press and hold FF to move into x2 playback/seek speed.  
Holding the button down any longer has no effect.  Perhaps holding the button 
down longer could continue to increase the seek speed, x4, x8 etc,  eg. just 
implement a FF.repeat action.

I'd have no objection against a configurable ff-scheme, but I imagine that 
goes against the first rule of coding:
Keep it simple.

There is no first rule of coding.

Phil
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread slimkid

Phil Meyer;250971 Wrote: 
 
 There is no first rule of coding.
 Phil

If there were the first rule of coding, then, I'd imagine it would be -
the code has to do something useful and purposeful, preferably what the
paying side asked for.

Good that this thread was started (kudos to the idea that the client is
ultimate target of the product and keep it simple - ask them - what is
that they really want). Shows that various people have different view
on the subject. I too find the current solution rather useless,
partially because of the fact that it's not consistent - SB does not
react to the remote same way all the time; an then, pressing the play
is hit and miss. Since I have discovered song scanner, I don't think I
ever used the original way to FF. However, I can see a merit to Phil's
view and for sure there are people using it the old way. So, I guess,
there will have to be room made for both solutions, either as a
configurable option or at the same time. I think that just integrating
the song scanner, so that it is easier to access would be big step in
the right direction. Because, the only drawback to it is the fact that
it takes too many key strokes to get.

K


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread peterw

Phil Meyer;250943 Wrote: 
 My most frequent use for fast-forwarding is when I am listening to
 podcasts that I have downloaded and scanned into my music library.  For
 example, Coverville.  An episode of this podcast generally lasts 30mins
 to an hour.  When I hear a bad song, I want to skip forward to the
 next.  With no audio feedback, I would not know when to stop
 fast-forwarding.  I'd have to look at the current playtime,
 fast-forward a bit, stop, listen and then fast-forward or rewind a bit.
 With an automatic acceleration in the FF/REW speed, this would be even
 worse.  The functionality would be totally useless.
 
 I think some form of audio feedback is essential, and in my opinion
 expected by those who are not techically aware - those that are moving
 from CD playback.

How would you feel about DVR-like behavior? Press Fwd once and you jump
~30 seconds ahead (rough computation based on file size if not natively
supported format?), pres Rew once and you jump ~10 seconds back. The UI
should let users choose different Fwd and Rew jump amounts.

Perhaps even better -- momentary presses would have that DVR-like
behavior, and held presses would have Alan's proposed behavior.

 I also use KDF's Scanner plugin, so 
 I have the best of both worlds.  This is useful for long tracks, when I
 do know where I want to jump to, as it is quicker than fast-forwarding. 
 However, I think this is the less-likely scenario.  I can't think of
 many times when I have specifically needed to jump to a known position
 in a song

I use my Squeezeboxes and a RadioShark AM/FM capture device to time
shift radio programs. Often I have to stop playing a program mid-way.
I use SongScanner to resume playback in these cases (I'd like to have
something like MythTV's saved position functionality.)

-Peter


-- 
peterw

http://www.tux.org/~peterw/
free plugins: http://www.tux.org/~peterw/#slim
AllQuiet BlankSaver BottleRocket FuzzyTime SaverSwitcher SleepFade
StatusFirst VolumeLock

peterw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2107
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-22 Thread Mnyb

I have never undestood the ff function untill today :-)
It works even worse in an wifi setupp.

Let me start by recapping on the current functionality, as I
understand it:

* FFW mode can be entered by press-and-hold of the  button on
the remote. It will remain in FFW mode once the  button is
released. SC will start playing at 2X normal speed, where it will play
1s of audio, skip 1s, play 1s,  A further press-and-hold of the
 button will increase this to 4X speed where only 1s out of every
4s is played. One can repeat this to 8X, 16X, ..., although at some
point the server will probably run out of power to supply data at this
rate.

I'm probably to fast ;-) i press  nothing happens or it goes silent
then a little later a sound snippet ? by then i've pressed play again.
Confused as ever. Now i get it, I'm not patient enough to let the
function kick in.

I will vote for a silent mode with a progress bar, and add alittle
display for track time.


-- 
Mnyb

Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread awy

(This is a repost of a message from the Developer
forum as this topic probably deserves a wider audience.)

I am looking at changing, I hope improving, the design and
implementation of the fast-forward (FFW) and rewind  (REW)
functionality in SqueezeCentre. There is considerable dissatisfaction
with the current implementation, although I suspect that it probably
meets the needs of some people just fine.

Let me start by recapping on the current functionality, as I understand
it:


-  FFW mode can be entered by press-and-hold of the  button on
  the remote. It will remain in FFW mode once the  button is
  released. SC will start playing at 2X normal speed, where it will
  play 1s of audio, skip 1s, play 1s,  A further press-and-hold of
  the  button will increase this to 4X speed where only 1s out of
  every 4s is played. One can repeat this to 8X, 16X, ..., although at
  some point the server will probably run out of power to supply data
  at this rate.
-  REW mode can be entered by press-and-hold of the  button on
  the remote and is otherwise the same as FFW mode.
-  If the now-playing screen was not displaying then it is bought up,
  switching to progress-bar mode if necessary.
-  The FFW/REW mode is exited by pressing the Pause or Play buttons.
-  If FFW/REW runs past the end or beginning of the track, then it
  continues with the next/previous track in the playlist.
  

This interface is much like that of VCR/DVD players and less like that
of CD and portable-music players. Some find this unintuitive and have
remapped the buttons so that FFW/REW is exited immediately upon
releasing the relevant button, presumably only ever getting to 2X
speed.

There is considerable doubt about whether being able to hear the 1s
chunks of audio in these modes is actually of any use.

The implementation only works for sources through which one can seek.
In practice, this is limited to local files which are not transcoded
and which are in WAV, MP3 or FLAC format.

The implementation (called trick-mode internally) is pretty inefficient
and somewhat hit-and-miss. Recent improvements have made it somewhat
more reliable and so that it mostly works with synchronized players but
did not address the core problems with the design. The implementation
also has the problem that it affects many different parts of the SC
software. It would be great to get rid of it.

PROPOSAL:

- Change the user-interface.
- Remove the audio feedback.
  

-User interface-

-  Press-and-hold  to enter FFW and release it to resume play.
  Similarly for REW.
-  Change the display to something like the input bar (currently used
  for volume and tone control) and advance a cursor along the bar
  proportional to the position in the track. On the right-hand end of
  the bar should be the total-length of the track and at the left-hand
  end should be the time of the current cursor position.
-  I anticipate some sort of acceleration if the button is held down.
  Perhaps start at about 3X and jump to 10X after 5s.
-  Resume playing from the position indicated by the cursor when the
  button is released.
-  Stop at either end of the track, and start playing at normal speed
  either from the beginning of the next track (FFW) or the current track
  (REW) when the button is released.
  

Much of this is based upon a plugin by -kdf- of these forums. 

I would be pleased to get feedback on these proposals and additional or
alternative suggestions.

Alan.


-- 
awy

awy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7480
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread Peter
awy wrote:
 I am looking at changing, I hope improving, the design and
 implementation of the fast-forward (FFW) and rewind  (REW)
 functionality in SqueezeCentre. There is considerable dissatisfaction
 with the current implementation, although I suspect that it probably
 meets the needs of some people just fine.
   

I think this would be a great improvement. I hardly ever use the 
FFWD/REW buttons at the moment because I find them very confusing. I'd 
love to see the functionality you propose instead. Or why not make the 
ffwd behavior configurable per player so we can all have our wish? It 
seems your system should be easier to program than the current.

Regards,
Peter

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread cbemoore

Before going any further, I'd recommend reading Sean Adams' explanation
of the current FFWD/REW design. He makes some very interesting points!

http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36446


-- 
cbemoore

cbemoore's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=163
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread Peter
cbemoore wrote:
 Before going any further, I'd recommend reading Sean Adams' explanation
 of the current FFWD/REW design. He makes some very interesting points!

 http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36446
   

I read it but there doesn't seem to be anything that contradicts this 
solution. Alan suggests a 'silent' ffwd/rew, basically like you would 
lift the pickup from an old-fashioned record and place it somewhere 
else. No sound while moving, just a visual indicator should surely make 
this a lot easier.

Regards,
Peter
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread seanadams

cbemoore;250534 Wrote: 
 Before going any further, I'd recommend reading Sean Adams' explanation
 of the current FFWD/REW design. He makes some very interesting points!
 
 http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36446

Most may not be aware that Alan was the person recently responsible for
a major redesign of the multi-SB synchronization machinery for SC7, so
he knows this corner of the code base now probably better than
anyone... certainly better than me. :)

I agree that using a proportional bar would be much better than what we
have now.


-- 
seanadams

seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread slimkid

Check out what song scanner plugin does. It delivers nice solution to
the problem (IMNSHO).

K


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread Deano

Another Vote for Alan's suggestions! I too find the current solution
unpredictable and therefore do not use it.

And if the multi-SB synch in SC7 that Alan worked on is anything to go
by it will be brilliantly implemented.

In fact, I'd just like to say thank you to everyone for all your hard
work. I'm running a nightly from 2 weeks ago on Vista. And it's working
perfectly, very stable and I'm loving all the improvements.

Thanks again. D.


-- 
Deano

Deano's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7775
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread Toby Dickenson
awy wrote:

 I would be pleased to get feedback on these proposals and additional or
 alternative suggestions.

It all looks good.

Is there any possibility this could be made to work for transcoded files
too? If only to avoid the inconsistency in behaviour.

I guess the implementation would involve spooling the output of the
transcoding process on disk just in case someone wanted to rewind in future
and, during a fast forward, spinning that process as fast as it can run
until it catches up with the new play position.



___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread seanadams

Toby Dickenson;250649 Wrote: 
 awy wrote:
 
  I would be pleased to get feedback on these proposals and additional
 or
  alternative suggestions.
 
 It all looks good.
 
 Is there any possibility this could be made to work for transcoded
 files
 too? If only to avoid the inconsistency in behaviour.
 
 I guess the implementation would involve spooling the output of the
 transcoding process on disk just in case someone wanted to rewind in
 future
 and, during a fast forward, spinning that process as fast as it can
 run
 until it catches up with the new play position.

For most (all?) formats we should be able to just seek proportionally
to the designated point in the _source_ file, and just re-start
transcoding from there.

The main reason transcoding does not work with the current ffw/rw
architecture is because of complexities created by trying to play
snippets of audio while scanning.


-- 
seanadams

seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread Wirrunna

seanadams;250676 Wrote: 
 For most (all?) formats we should be able to just seek proportionally to
 the designated point in the _source_ file, and just re-start transcoding
 from there.
 
 The main reason transcoding does not work with the current ffw/rw
 architecture is because of complexities created by trying to play
 snippets of audio while scanning.

Include transcoded files and it will immediately get my vote and I
suspect the vote of everyone who has their library in Apple lossless.


-- 
Wirrunna

A camel is a racehorse designed by a committee.

Wirrunna's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3225
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast-forward/rewind redesign

2007-12-21 Thread muvee69

+1


And I was told to lengthen my reply.
I totally agree to this. Love my SB.
The box, proning on top of my televison, interferes with my TV antenna
signal. So... I listen more to music, and watch less television. :)


-- 
muvee69

muvee69's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14200
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41235

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-25 Thread shaunm

My problem with the FF/Rew functioanility is that only the Next Track,
Start of Current and Previous Track functions work.

I can scan a x2, x4 by holding the button down, but I cannot play from
the middle of the track.  If I hit pause, it pauses, hit pauses again
and nothing happens.

If I hit play, when scanning, nothing happens.

If I pause during scanning, then hit play, it plays from the beginning
of the track.


-- 
shaunm

shaunm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11987
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-23 Thread flipflip

Not sure if this might be interesting for other people who need ffw/rew
(I need it in Podcasts and audio books):

http://oinkzwurgl.org/skipper


-- 
flipflip

Check out flipflip's 'SlimServer On DiskStation (SSODS)'
(http://oinkzwurgl.org/ssods/)!

flipflip's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5223
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-23 Thread stuorguk

FF/REW is just not intuitive for me.  I found remapping the Song Scanner
plugin to the FF/REW buttons a better alternative, although it's not a
perfect solution.


-- 
stuorguk

stuorguk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=521
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-23 Thread mswlogo

MelonMonkey;210215 Wrote: 
 Almost every product that features these abilities has them using the
 same buttons. This is a very basic control implementation from a
 usability perspective and something trivial from a timing/programming
 perspective as well. It's not part of any problem.
 
 The FFWD and REW are just awkward implementations. They work as
 designed, but, like the original poster, I just wish they were designed
 to operate in the expected/common/standard method.
 
 I'm certain the server-based nature of the product may include some
 latency, but I'd rather take my chances than be stuck with what exists
 now.

I've never seen it.

Usually devices have 4 buttons for this.

, and |,| (These are Rew, FF, Next, Prev respectively)

The problem is you fumble around with FF and you don't hold it long
enough and boom song gone (you execute a next track).

The whole thing of changing it's function based on how long you hold it
is bad.

As far as remote strength goes, that has nothing to do with it and
strength is excellent from stock remote. I can blast it off walls etc.
Harmony works well too.

The basic edit I did in the map was to get rid of the HOLD thing and
map the 4 functions to 4 buttons (with no holding). And map them to the
standard 4 buttons found on any universal remote. ,,|,|

After this it is fairly normal.

You have to pick 2 buttons to give up though. I used volume keys
because I use an external DAC and Volume is locked any ways.

When you're done you get.

One tap on FF and it's fast forwarding instantly. Want it faster, Tap
Tap. No Tap HOLD, Tap HOLD. You can't screw it up. And you can't
accidently Tap to Slow or Fast and get unwanted behavior (i.e. the next
song, g).

Next Track is then just a tap too on a seperate button (you won't
accidently start a FF if you hold it too long).

I think I posted MAP file once, don't have access at the moment to
server.


-- 
mswlogo

Thinkpad XP SS  Cat5  SB3  SPDIF-COAX  Meridian 861V4 (Trifield,
Room corrected, Upsampled)  DSP5500 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33
Rears

mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-22 Thread Skittler

mswlogo,
What have you found works well as an alternative mapping?

Could you post the relavent section of your .map file?

Thanks,
Dave


-- 
Skittler

Skittler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11280
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-22 Thread slimkid

+1 for everything said so far. However, in my experience, this is also a
function of the included remote. I have mapped my NAD remote to control
SB too (initially, for pure convenience) and have noticed that SB
reacts much better to it, than to its original remote. At first, though
it was about batteries, changed them and still, NAD remote with a year
old batteries gets better responiveness than the original one with
brand new batts. That includes FF/RW but also browsing and everything
else that is mapped.


-- 
slimkid

The sound stage will open up, bass will tighten and the imaging will
improve. DVD performance will also increase substantially.

slimkid's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8881
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-22 Thread MelonMonkey

Let's keep some things clear so the issue doesn't get lost or
misdirected.

Remote reception and strength is certainly a concern or source of
potential issue from one product to the next and can be affected by a
large number of variables. One handset in comparison to another for
starters can use different amounts of power to their IR LEDs, a
different number of LEDs, better filtered LEDs, etc.

The issue being discussed right now isn't about remote problems but a
problem that as users we perceive with the current implementation of
FFWD and REW.

We're not talking about a bug or transient issue, but the fundamental
design difference between the SB and any normal CD player (and
many/most other DAPs) with regards to forwarding and rewinding.

The current implementation while in playback mode (only tested with MP3
files):

 
 Short press FFWD = skip to next track
 Short press REW (1) = skip to start of track if elapsed track time 
 certain offset
 Short press REW (2) = skip to previous track if elapsed track time 
 certain offset
 
 Long press FFWD = activates an automatic 2x fast-forward mode
 (releasing the button leaves the player in this mode)
 Long press REW = activates an automatic 2x fast-rewind mode (releasing
 the button leaves the player in this mode)
 

The 2x auto ffwd/rew sounds choppy and jumpy. You must be viewing the
two smaller Now Playing modes to know what's going on. There's no
FFWD/REW indicator when viewing in large font (this is also a big
problem)

Repeating the long-press will switch over to 4x then 8x, 16x and 32x
modes.

This is working similar to the FFWD and REW buttons on most DVD
players.

Expected behavior is that of a CD player:

 
 Short presses = same as they are now, they're correct.
 
 Long press FFWD = playback increases rate to some fixed x and less
 choppiness should be present in the audio
 
 Long press REW = playback increases reverse rate to some fixed x and
 less choppiness should be present in the audio
 

In both cases, releasing the FFWD/REW buttons should cause normal 1x
forward playback to resume.

What this implementation loses is variable rate scanning. What it gains
is a better connection to the user in terms of function. There is a more
direct/tangible/immediate relationship between the pressing of buttons
and the output of the player. It is the expected behavior for anyone
that has ever used a late model tape player, CD player or many other
DAP products.

If many people like the DVD-like scanning modes, then this could always
be rolled into a configurable option. There are already so many I'm sure
another one won't cause a huge issue. All these hundreds of options need
to be hidden away for a more consumer interface anyway. And this mode
set up as a default will definitely cause much less confusion when
someone uses this product for the first time.


-- 
MelonMonkey

Bruno
*'Twisted Melon - Fine Mac OS Software' (http://twistedmelon.com) |
'mira - Personal Control for your Apple Remote'
(http://twistedmelon.com)*

MelonMonkey's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8466
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-21 Thread MelonMonkey

mswlogo;210121 Wrote: 
 
 One huge problem is, the Fast Forward and Rewind Buttons are double
 mapped.
 

Almost every product that features these abilities has them using the
same buttons. This is a very basic control implementation from a
usability perspective and something trivial from a timing/programming
perspective as well. It's not part of any problem.

The FFWD and REW are just awkward implementations. They work as
designed, but, like the original poster, I just wish they were designed
to operate in the expected/common/standard method.

I'm certain the server-based nature of the product may include some
latency, but I'd rather take my chances than be stuck with what exists
now.


-- 
MelonMonkey

Bruno
*'Twisted Melon - Fine Mac OS Software' (http://twistedmelon.com) |
'mira - Personal Control for your Apple Remote'
(http://twistedmelon.com)*

MelonMonkey's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8466
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-21 Thread vrobin

+1 .


-- 
vrobin

vrobin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11705
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-21 Thread amey01

This has been asked before and is my pet peeve as well. In fact, it is
my ONLY probelm with an otherwise fantastic product. 

It is an advertised feature (and I would not have bought the Squeezebox
if they had advertised that this simple feature that has been on every
CD player (and WORKED ON EVERY CD PLAYER) since inception) didn't work.


I would think this has to be the highest priority as it is the ONLY
bug [more like inadequacy] where any old CD payer surpasses the
Squeezebox.

That also means having it work for non-native fomats. Nowhere is it
advertised that you have to use FLAC or MP3 only if you want a fully
functioning Squeezebox.


-- 
amey01

amey01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11274
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-21 Thread thomsens

amey01;210282 Wrote: 
 This has been asked before and is my pet peeve as well. In fact, it is
 my ONLY probelm with an otherwise fantastic product. 
 
 It is an advertised feature (and I would not have bought the Squeezebox
 if they had advertised that this simple feature that has been on every
 CD player (and WORKED ON EVERY CD PLAYER) since inception) didn't work.
 
 
 I would think this has to be the highest priority as it is the ONLY
 bug [more like inadequacy] where any old CD payer surpasses the
 Squeezebox.
 
 That also means having it work for non-native fomats. Nowhere is it
 advertised that you have to use FLAC or MP3 only if you want a fully
 functioning Squeezebox.

I use both FLAC and MP3 and neither work well.


-- 
thomsens

thomsens's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1352
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-20 Thread thomsens

I'm sure it's been asked before, but is there any hope that the FF and
RW will be improved on the Transporter/SB?  As far as I'm concerned
it's almost a broken implementation at this point.  It's frustrating
because it's the only thing I miss about my CD player.  I'm using
6.5.2.


-- 
thomsens

thomsens's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1352
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward/Rewind

2007-06-20 Thread mswlogo

I totally agree but you can fix it.

One huge problem is, the Fast Forward and Rewind Buttons are double
mapped.

They are mapped to Next Track / Previous Track AND Fast Forward and
Rewind. Depending on how long and how many times you tap it.

You can remap these to different buttons.

Once seperated they work much better.

You do this by editing the Default.map file in the server\IR
directory.

Also you cannot have transcoding active and the format must be native
(e.g. FLAC) for fast forward to work.

It's still not as smooth and robust as a CD player but it's usable. As
shipped it's unusable in my opinion too.

The fix above also makes Next Track/Previous track more robust too. I
split them to the Volume Up down buttons because I use an external DAC.
Then on my Harmony remote I map them correctly to SEPERATE FF/RW Next
Track/Previous Track buttons.


-- 
mswlogo

Thinkpad XP SS  Cat5  SB3  SPDIF-COAX  Meridian 861V4 (Trifield,
Room corrected, Upsampled)  DSP5500 Mains, DSP5500HC Center, DSP33
Rears

mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36287

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-20 Thread azinck3

Mark Lanctot;188627 Wrote: 
 You shouldn't have to, it should try built-in first then move to WAV,
 FLAC then MP3.
 
 But good to hear it's working for you.

Actually, I think that it transcodes to FLAC by default to save
bandwidth and improve performance over wireless which is why the FF/REW
wasn't working for the OP until streaming AIFF by way of FLAC was
disabled.


-- 
azinck3

azinck3's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3967
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-19 Thread dcote

there is one exception: ogg-vorbis.

it is played/decoded natively in SB3, but can not FF/REW.

has to do with the way the SB3 currently decodes streams and has them
served by slimserver.

cheers,

dominique


-- 
dcote

dcote's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9701
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-18 Thread Mark Lanctot

Any file format in SlimServer - Server Settings - File Types that says
built-in will allow FF/REW.

If it doesn't, it's being transcoded because the built-in decoder has
been disabled.  Make sure built-in is checked and no other ones are
for that format, although it should choose the built-in format first
even if you have multiple ones checked.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-18 Thread KeithL

Mark,

Thanks for the advice. I went into file formats and disabled all the
other file formats except aiff (built in) and hey presto, I have ff and
rew on my sb3!!! It was checked before as well as many other file
formats. I didn't realize you had to uncheck every other format. 

Keith


-- 
KeithL

KeithL's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9272
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-18 Thread Mark Lanctot

KeithL;188626 Wrote: 
 I didn't realize you had to uncheck every otherformat.

You shouldn't have to, it should try built-in first then move to WAV,
FLAC then MP3.

But good to hear it's working for you.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-17 Thread KeithL

Thanks for the reply Ceejay. However I am none the wiser. The blurb says
sb3 has a built in aiff decoder so does this mean it can handle aiff
files natively, and if so, shouldn't I be able to ff and rew aiff
files? Is there a setting in Slim Server that will enable this
feature?
Keith


-- 
KeithL

KeithL's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9272
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-16 Thread KeithL

Which file formats allow ff and rew as opposed to skip forward a track
or skip back a track?
I know mp3 allow such, and wav, aiff, apple lossless do not.
Keith


-- 
KeithL

KeithL's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9272
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast Forward Rewind

2007-03-16 Thread ceejay

The key question isn't the file type as such, it is actually driven by
whether the music is being transcoded at the server or not. This
depends on the file type, the capability of the particular SB model,
and how you have your server settings.  See

http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.cgi?Transcoding

HTH
Ceejay


-- 
ceejay

ceejay's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=148
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33650

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] fast forward/rewind fix idea

2006-12-13 Thread lanierb

I find the FF/RW functions to be totally useless (they don't even really
work and even when they do they are hard to use).  How hard would it be
to do a 30 sec forward skip and 10 sec backward skip instead (for each
button press).  On my Tivo these two functions allow me to find where I
want to go very quickly.

Lanier


-- 
lanierb

lanierb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5566
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30596

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] fast forward/rewind problems with WMA

2006-02-05 Thread elidaniel

I'm using slimserver 6.1.2, configured to play WMAs natively, not
transcoded.

The fast forward and rewind operations for WMAs (and the song scanner
plugin) do not work: playback just stops completely.  It's working fine
for MP3s, however.

I can't tell whether this is a known bug.  There's an open issue in the
bug database about this, but it predates the native WMA support, and
there is nothing in there indicating whether it's still a problem now. 
I have seen a couple other complaints along the same lines, but no clear
resolution.

So, should I file a bug report?  Is this already a known issue?  Is
there some debugging output I can provide that would help track down
the problem?

Thanks!

-Eli Daniel


-- 
elidaniel

elidaniel's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3765
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=20803

___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Fast forward Rewind

2005-06-21 Thread stuorguk

I find the Fast forward  Rewind rather slow, and unintuitive.  I was
thinking about how this could be improved.

As an optional alternative, how about the following:

Rather than playing in stepped intervals while it scans, how about just
visually indicating where in the file you are on a full screen
barograph.  When you hold down the FF/RW button, the Barograph moves up
(or down), first starting slow, then accelerating.  The moment you
release the FF/RW button, playback resumes from the new position.

What do other people think?


-- 
stuorguk
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Fast forward Rewind

2005-06-21 Thread kdf
Quoting stuorguk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Rather than playing in stepped intervals while it scans, how about just
 visually indicating where in the file you are on a full screen
 barograph.  When you hold down the FF/RW button, the Barograph moves up
 (or down), first starting slow, then accelerating.  The moment you
 release the FF/RW button, playback resumes from the new position.

There is a plugin for this:
http://www.deane-freeman.com/slimserver/Scanner.pm

no one-key solution, but that's just how it is :)
-kdf
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss