Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

On 9/23/20 2:05 AM, andy pugh wrote:

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 04:44, R C  wrote:


Wonder if there is something like that for simple things on a lathe.

I already mentioned my lathe macros.

With that and G72 you don't really need CAM. Or even CAD.



What I meant, with the rest of my email, is more  gui style utilities 
like: https://www.intuwiz.com/



for example,  there's this one: https://www.intuwiz.com/round-rectangle.html


but I'll check out the macros



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 04:44, R C  wrote:

> Wonder if there is something like that for simple things on a lathe.

I already mentioned my lathe macros.

With that and G72 you don't really need CAM. Or even CAD.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

well, I got a lot of good information from this list,  also where I was 
"rebuilding" the mill and lathe.


(Phill Carter helped my out A LOT)


There are a bunch of utilities out on the web, that let's you drill 
holes in patterns, make pockets in certain sizes/shapes etc.



Wonder if there is something like that for simple things on a lathe.


Ron


On 9/22/20 9:32 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Tuesday 22 September 2020 15:17:21 R C wrote:


Hi Chris,


well, basically I just want to learn how to use them, by making some
things I actually have a use for. For now on the lathe, I am trying to
make a little shaft for a project.

Why use CNC?  well, because I want to learnhow to use, do lathe work,
using CNC.

Well, I do/did build robots/rovers and such.  and dozens, no, but
maybe 3 shafts that are the same, and if one breaks or so, make
another (the same) one


So really it's about me wanting to learn how to do it, preferably with
something like freecad or so.


I don't make a living CNC machining, I wouldn't be a starving one, but
be dead one by now. I just want to learn how to do it, because I can.


thanks,


Ron

On 9/22/20 11:21 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

What are you doing with the Lathe that you need CNC?   The answer to
this will determine what software you need.

As soon as you get into operations that are synchronized to the
spindle rotation, like threading you are in need of specialized
lathe-specif CAM software.On the other hand, if you are making a
one-off bushing why use CNC?

One good reason to use CNC on the lathe is for repeatability.  Hand
made parts are only as good as the skill of the operator.  If I
needed to make a few of dozen parts (for maybe an MIT "mini cheetah"
robot) I'd go for CNC so I could be certain the parts would
interchange.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:53 PM R C  wrote:

Hello,


I was away for a while, I saw a lot of replies/suggestions on the
"subject".   I am going to try and see if I can make the part (a
shaft) in freecad, and see what I can do with it.


As for the other software,  well I won't be making money of it,
It's just a hobby,  BUT  I don't really want to set up another
machine or so just for  running something else.


I was thinking,  that since  a lathe (well my lathe)  has a X and Z
axis, if I'd make a part in 'that plane" in freecad,  that it might
be possible to use that?  I saw a suggestion that there might a a
part/plugin in the path workbench.


thanks,

And this list is probably the best on the planet to learn from.


Ron


Cheers, Gene Heskett



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Gene Heskett]

On Tuesday 22 September 2020 15:17:21 R C wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
>
> well, basically I just want to learn how to use them, by making some
> things I actually have a use for. For now on the lathe, I am trying to
> make a little shaft for a project.
>
> Why use CNC?  well, because I want to learnhow to use, do lathe work,
> using CNC.
>
> Well, I do/did build robots/rovers and such.  and dozens, no, but
> maybe 3 shafts that are the same, and if one breaks or so, make
> another (the same) one
>
>
> So really it's about me wanting to learn how to do it, preferably with
> something like freecad or so.
>
>
> I don't make a living CNC machining, I wouldn't be a starving one, but
> be dead one by now. I just want to learn how to do it, because I can.
>
>
> thanks,
>
>
> Ron
>
> On 9/22/20 11:21 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > What are you doing with the Lathe that you need CNC?   The answer to
> > this will determine what software you need.
> >
> > As soon as you get into operations that are synchronized to the
> > spindle rotation, like threading you are in need of specialized
> > lathe-specif CAM software.On the other hand, if you are making a
> > one-off bushing why use CNC?
> >
> > One good reason to use CNC on the lathe is for repeatability.  Hand
> > made parts are only as good as the skill of the operator.  If I
> > needed to make a few of dozen parts (for maybe an MIT "mini cheetah"
> > robot) I'd go for CNC so I could be certain the parts would
> > interchange.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:53 PM R C  wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> I was away for a while, I saw a lot of replies/suggestions on the
> >> "subject".   I am going to try and see if I can make the part (a
> >> shaft) in freecad, and see what I can do with it.
> >>
> >>
> >> As for the other software,  well I won't be making money of it,
> >> It's just a hobby,  BUT  I don't really want to set up another
> >> machine or so just for  running something else.
> >>
> >>
> >> I was thinking,  that since  a lathe (well my lathe)  has a X and Z
> >> axis, if I'd make a part in 'that plane" in freecad,  that it might
> >> be possible to use that?  I saw a suggestion that there might a a
> >> part/plugin in the path workbench.
> >>
> >>
> >> thanks,

And this list is probably the best on the planet to learn from.

> >> Ron


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 20:57, Chris Albertson  wrote:
>
> If learning is the goal.  I think the route is to first hand-code the
> g-code files.

This is potentially very easy with G72. You just need to create the
outer profile with G1, G2, G3 commands and the canned cycle does the
rest.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

If learning is the goal.  I think the route is to first hand-code the
g-code files.   Then if you want to learn how to connect CAD models to
g-code you have no option but to get a CAD system that has native CAM for
lathes.Fusion360, Solidworks, and Inventor are options but OnShape and
FreeCAD are non-options.

G-code for a mill is so different from g-code for a lathe that you can't
use one for the other. The tool libraries alone would be very different.

Solidworks is free for EAA members.  That could work.  Or if you don't care
about saving your work, Fusion 360 for free is still a valid opinion.
Parts designed for lathes are very simple so who cares about saving the
design to .step files?   Just use Fusion360   (or Solidworks)




On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:20 PM R C  wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
>
> well, basically I just want to learn how to use them, by making some
> things I actually have a use for. For now on the lathe, I am trying to
> make a little shaft for a project.
>
> Why use CNC?  well, because I want to learnhow to use, do lathe work,
> using CNC.
>
> Well, I do/did build robots/rovers and such.  and dozens, no, but maybe
> 3 shafts that are the same, and if one breaks or so, make another (the
> same) one
>
>
> So really it's about me wanting to learn how to do it, preferably with
> something like freecad or so.
>
>
> I don't make a living CNC machining, I wouldn't be a starving one, but
> be dead one by now. I just want to learn how to do it, because I can.
>
>
> thanks,
>
>
> Ron
>
>
> On 9/22/20 11:21 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > What are you doing with the Lathe that you need CNC?   The answer to this
> > will determine what software you need.
> >
> > As soon as you get into operations that are synchronized to the spindle
> > rotation, like threading you are in need of specialized lathe-specif CAM
> > software.On the other hand, if you are making a one-off bushing why
> use
> > CNC?
> >
> > One good reason to use CNC on the lathe is for repeatability.  Hand made
> > parts are only as good as the skill of the operator.  If I needed to
> make a
> > few of dozen parts (for maybe an MIT "mini cheetah" robot) I'd go for CNC
> > so I could be certain the parts would interchange.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:53 PM R C  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> I was away for a while, I saw a lot of replies/suggestions on the
> >> "subject".   I am going to try and see if I can make the part (a shaft)
> >> in freecad, and see what I can do with it.
> >>
> >>
> >> As for the other software,  well I won't be making money of it, It's
> >> just a hobby,  BUT  I don't really want to set up another machine or so
> >> just for  running something else.
> >>
> >>
> >> I was thinking,  that since  a lathe (well my lathe)  has a X and Z
> >> axis, if I'd make a part in 'that plane" in freecad,  that it might be
> >> possible to use that?  I saw a suggestion that there might a a
> >> part/plugin in the path workbench.
> >>
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >> Ron
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Emc-users mailing list
> >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >>
> >
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

Hi Chris,


well, basically I just want to learn how to use them, by making some 
things I actually have a use for. For now on the lathe, I am trying to 
make a little shaft for a project.


Why use CNC?  well, because I want to learnhow to use, do lathe work, 
using CNC.


Well, I do/did build robots/rovers and such.  and dozens, no, but maybe 
3 shafts that are the same, and if one breaks or so, make another (the 
same) one



So really it's about me wanting to learn how to do it, preferably with 
something like freecad or so.



I don't make a living CNC machining, I wouldn't be a starving one, but 
be dead one by now. I just want to learn how to do it, because I can.



thanks,


Ron


On 9/22/20 11:21 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

What are you doing with the Lathe that you need CNC?   The answer to this
will determine what software you need.

As soon as you get into operations that are synchronized to the spindle
rotation, like threading you are in need of specialized lathe-specif CAM
software.On the other hand, if you are making a one-off bushing why use
CNC?

One good reason to use CNC on the lathe is for repeatability.  Hand made
parts are only as good as the skill of the operator.  If I needed to make a
few of dozen parts (for maybe an MIT "mini cheetah" robot) I'd go for CNC
so I could be certain the parts would interchange.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:53 PM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I was away for a while, I saw a lot of replies/suggestions on the
"subject".   I am going to try and see if I can make the part (a shaft)
in freecad, and see what I can do with it.


As for the other software,  well I won't be making money of it, It's
just a hobby,  BUT  I don't really want to set up another machine or so
just for  running something else.


I was thinking,  that since  a lathe (well my lathe)  has a X and Z
axis, if I'd make a part in 'that plane" in freecad,  that it might be
possible to use that?  I saw a suggestion that there might a a
part/plugin in the path workbench.


thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users






___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

What are you doing with the Lathe that you need CNC?   The answer to this
will determine what software you need.

As soon as you get into operations that are synchronized to the spindle
rotation, like threading you are in need of specialized lathe-specif CAM
software.On the other hand, if you are making a one-off bushing why use
CNC?

One good reason to use CNC on the lathe is for repeatability.  Hand made
parts are only as good as the skill of the operator.  If I needed to make a
few of dozen parts (for maybe an MIT "mini cheetah" robot) I'd go for CNC
so I could be certain the parts would interchange.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:53 PM R C  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I was away for a while, I saw a lot of replies/suggestions on the
> "subject".   I am going to try and see if I can make the part (a shaft)
> in freecad, and see what I can do with it.
>
>
> As for the other software,  well I won't be making money of it, It's
> just a hobby,  BUT  I don't really want to set up another machine or so
> just for  running something else.
>
>
> I was thinking,  that since  a lathe (well my lathe)  has a X and Z
> axis, if I'd make a part in 'that plane" in freecad,  that it might be
> possible to use that?  I saw a suggestion that there might a a
> part/plugin in the path workbench.
>
>
> thanks,
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

Hello,


I was away for a while, I saw a lot of replies/suggestions on the 
"subject".   I am going to try and see if I can make the part (a shaft) 
in freecad, and see what I can do with it.



As for the other software,  well I won't be making money of it, It's 
just a hobby,  BUT  I don't really want to set up another machine or so 
just for  running something else.



I was thinking,  that since  a lathe (well my lathe)  has a X and Z 
axis, if I'd make a part in 'that plane" in freecad,  that it might be 
possible to use that?  I saw a suggestion that there might a a 
part/plugin in the path workbench.



thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 11:50, andy pugh  wrote:

> Not that the postprocessor files are stored locally, for example. As
> are the thread tables etc.

Just to clarify. That was a typo that pretty much inverted the meaning
of the sentence.

Swap "Not" to "Note"


-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andrew beck]

That would be awesome if pycam was intergrated

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020, 11:08 PM andy pugh  wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 01:30, John Dammeyer 
> wrote:
> >
> > There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
> > If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
> Less than $200.
>
> Despite what people are saying, Fusion isn't a web-app, and the vast
> majority of the computation is done locally.
> Not that the postprocessor files are stored locally, for example. As
> are the thread tables etc.
>
> All that is done on "other people's computers" is file conversion and
> file storage. And I think that is intended as a feature to allow
> working on the same model from different locations and by more than
> one person.
> You can save the f3d locally. But I hear rumours that F3D is more of a
> memory dump than a file format and might be very version-dependent.
>
> > > What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
> .STEP
> > > files from any CAD system.
>
> Add a STEP importer to PyCAM?
> https://github.com/SebKuzminsky/pycam/releases
>
> PyCAM came within a whisker of moving in to the LinuxCNC project. It
> still might.
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[N]

> ...
> This is the same reason they give away the product to students.  They will
> graduate and need to convert the free license to a paid one.In a way,
> these airplane projects "graduate" too.

This giveaway happened with Simulink. Got the feeling they forgot about both 
control theory. For me it make no big difference if equations is drawn as 
figures or in text but I have to think hard about the mathematics.


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

What they get is sales of the full product.   Every new aircraft company
starts as a small project by some EAA member.   (Yes, I'd bet that EVERY
person working on a new small plane is a member.)  Then the project turns
into a company and they need to upgrade their license.   DS is "fishing" by
casting a wide net hoping to capture new paid users.

This is the same reason they give away the product to students.  They will
graduate and need to convert the free license to a paid one.In a way,
these airplane projects "graduate" too.

When you sign up as an EAA member you will get a monthly print magazine and
in it, you will see there must be hundreds of these small
aircraft companies.  It is a big industry when you add them all up.

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:22 AM Todd Zuercher 
wrote:

> Don't assume Solidworks doesn't get anything out of this deal ether.  I
> wouldn't be surprised if they count each EAA membership as a charitable
> gift worth the cost of a full seat that they then use as a tax deferral.
>
> Todd Zuercher
> P. Graham Dunn Inc.
> 630 Henry Street
> Dalton, Ohio 44618
> Phone:  (330)828-2105ext. 2031
>
> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh 
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 2:15 PM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) 
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe.
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 18:27, Dave Matthews  wrote:
>
> > > And what if all these uncommitted new members are noted by SW such
> > > that the offer gets withdrawn?
>
> > They really don't care why you join or how committed you are.
>
> My speculation was that SolidWorks might care.
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed
> for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Todd Zuercher]

Don't assume Solidworks doesn't get anything out of this deal ether.  I 
wouldn't be surprised if they count each EAA membership as a charitable gift 
worth the cost of a full seat that they then use as a tax deferral. 

Todd Zuercher
P. Graham Dunn Inc.
630 Henry Street 
Dalton, Ohio 44618
Phone:  (330)828-2105ext. 2031

-Original Message-
From: andy pugh  
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 2:15 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) 
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe.

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 18:27, Dave Matthews  wrote:

> > And what if all these uncommitted new members are noted by SW such 
> > that the offer gets withdrawn?

> They really don't care why you join or how committed you are.

My speculation was that SolidWorks might care.

--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for 
the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 18:27, Dave Matthews  wrote:

> > And what if all these uncommitted new members are noted by SW such
> > that the offer gets withdrawn?

> They really don't care why you join or how committed you are.

My speculation was that SolidWorks might care.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Dave Matthews]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 1:22 PM andy pugh  wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 17:04, Chris Albertson  
> wrote:
>
> > The EAA is a not for profit organization and can use your $60.  I am pretty
> > sure they don't care why you joined,
>
> And what if all these uncommitted new members are noted by SW such
> that the offer gets withdrawn?
>

They really don't care why you join or how committed you are.  The
more members they have the more clout they have in Washington when
lobbying.

Dave


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 17:04, Chris Albertson  wrote:

> The EAA is a not for profit organization and can use your $60.  I am pretty
> sure they don't care why you joined,

And what if all these uncommitted new members are noted by SW such
that the offer gets withdrawn?

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

Have you been an EAA member?  Many people here would like it.  There is
just a ton of information and articles and books they produce on
metalworking and paint and riveting and welding and so on.  Yes, it is all
aircraft related but it does have a wider application.

I'm sure that almost everyone on this list would not mind learning a little
bit about aircraft fabrication on wood, composite or metal aircraft.

The EAA is a not for profit organization and can use your $60.  I am pretty
sure they don't care why you joined,

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:45 AM andy pugh  wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 03:14, Chris Albertson 
> wrote:
> >
> > In your case, you might want DS Solidworks.
> ...
> > It might be worth buying an EAA membership then enrolling in the
> > "Solidworks University" program.
>
> Joining EAA just to get a discount on SW seems somewhat dishonest to me.
>
> Then the rest of the gnashing and wailing of teeth seems to be
> suggesting swapping to something much more expensive than
> paid-for-Fusion just to kick back at Autodesk.
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 01:30, John Dammeyer  wrote:
>
> There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
> If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.  Less 
> than $200.

Despite what people are saying, Fusion isn't a web-app, and the vast
majority of the computation is done locally.
Not that the postprocessor files are stored locally, for example. As
are the thread tables etc.

All that is done on "other people's computers" is file conversion and
file storage. And I think that is intended as a feature to allow
working on the same model from different locations and by more than
one person.
You can save the f3d locally. But I hear rumours that F3D is more of a
memory dump than a file format and might be very version-dependent.

> > What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts .STEP
> > files from any CAD system.

Add a STEP importer to PyCAM?
https://github.com/SebKuzminsky/pycam/releases

PyCAM came within a whisker of moving in to the LinuxCNC project. It
still might.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 03:14, Chris Albertson  wrote:
>
> In your case, you might want DS Solidworks.
...
> It might be worth buying an EAA membership then enrolling in the
> "Solidworks University" program.

Joining EAA just to get a discount on SW seems somewhat dishonest to me.

Then the rest of the gnashing and wailing of teeth seems to be
suggesting swapping to something much more expensive than
paid-for-Fusion just to kick back at Autodesk.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Phill Carter]

I got burnt by Alibre some years back with their entry level version.

I would never trust them again.

Cheers, Phill.

> On 18 Sep 2020, at 2:01 pm, Chris Albertson  wrote:
> 
> I just checked, the $199 version of Alibre is almost useless.  It does not
> even have Bolian operations and no CAM.At $750 you get a 2.5 axis CAM
> system and prices go up higher for more  features
> 
> FreeCAD does as much as the $750 Alibre.
> 
> To do more it seems the best option is either $500 for Fusion360 or $60 for
> Solidworks.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:02 PM John Dammeyer 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> I'm not paying $1000 year for AlibreCAM but then I don't have more than
>> the 4th axis package nor the lathe feature.
>> 
>> The basic AlibreCAD comes with a simple CAM module.I doubt the low end
>> Alibre for under $200 has CAM since that comes from MecSoft.
>> 
>> MecSoft also has CAM support for RhinoCAD and for their own Visual CAD/CAM
>> https://mecsoft.com/visualcadcam/
>> Starting price is $595.  I've used the VisualCAD.  Not a lot different
>> from the AlibreCAM since the basic engine is the same.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -Original Message-----
>>> From: Ken Strauss [mailto:ken.stra...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: September-17-20 6:56 PM
>>> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
>>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>>> 
>>> How do you generate gcode from Alibre? I found
>>> https://www.alibre.com/ecosystem-cam/ and AlibreCAM appears to be
>> $1000/year
>>> to over $21,000. I can afford $199 one time but an annual licence costing
>>> thousands is not in my budget!
>>> 
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: John Dammeyer [mailto:jo...@autoartisans.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:27 PM
>>>> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
>>>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>>>> 
>>>> There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
>>>> If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
>>> Less than $200.
>>>> 
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
>>>>> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>>>>> 
>>>>> Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
>>>>> personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file
>> after
>>>>> October 1, 2020.So download your stuff now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and
>>> for
>>>>> building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not
>> need
>>> it
>>>>> either.OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the
>>> LCNC
>>>>> list want CAM.
>>>>> 
>>>>> One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for
>> about
>>> $270
>>>>> but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
>>> .STEP
>>>>> files from any CAD system.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert  wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris,
>>>>>>> You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too
>>> expensive.
>>>>>>> Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
>>>>>>> solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual
>> feature is
>>>>>>> extrusion screws.
>>>>>>> Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features.
>> Has
>>> a
>>>>>>> 30 day free demo.
>>>>>>> https://www.webersys.com/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob
>> at
>>>>>> Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
>>>>&g

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

As I just wrote, after looking I find the only affordable CAM systems that
can do more than 3-axis are Fusion360 at $500 (on sale now for $270) and
Solidworks which id free with EAA membership.

2.5 axis systems are easier to find and it seems FreeCAD does that.

The free version of F360 is now to crippled to consider.

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 6:58 PM Ken Strauss  wrote:

> How do you generate gcode from Alibre? I found
> https://www.alibre.com/ecosystem-cam/ and AlibreCAM appears to be
> $1000/year
> to over $21,000. I can afford $199 one time but an annual licence costing
> thousands is not in my budget!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Dammeyer [mailto:jo...@autoartisans.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:27 PM
> > To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> >
> > There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
> > If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
> Less than $200.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
> > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> > >
> > > Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
> > > personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file after
> > > October 1, 2020.So download your stuff now.
> > >
> > > OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
> > >
> > > Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and
> for
> > > building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not need
> it
> > > either.OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the
> LCNC
> > > list want CAM.
> > >
> > > One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for about
> $270
> > > but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
> > >
> > > What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
> .STEP
> > > files from any CAD system.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert  wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
> > > > > Chris,
> > > > > You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too
> expensive.
> > > > > Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
> > > > > solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual feature
> is
> > > > > extrusion screws.
> > > > > Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features. Has
> a
> > > > > 30 day free demo.
> > > > > https://www.webersys.com/
> > > > >
> > > > I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob at
> > > > Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
> > > > supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
> > > > features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a
> couple
> > > > or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
> > > > product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
> > > > Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be
> > > > interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since
> 2015.
> > > > > As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to
> learn.
> > > > >
> > > > > YMMV
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > > > >> No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
> > > > >> lathes that runs on Linux.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/.
> But
> > > > >> unlike
> > > > >> Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths
> > > > >> unless
> > > > >> you get some 3rd party add-in software.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux
> based
> > > > >> 16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.
> > > > >> Onshape
> > 

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

I just checked, the $199 version of Alibre is almost useless.  It does not
even have Bolian operations and no CAM.At $750 you get a 2.5 axis CAM
system and prices go up higher for more  features

FreeCAD does as much as the $750 Alibre.

To do more it seems the best option is either $500 for Fusion360 or $60 for
Solidworks.



On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:02 PM John Dammeyer 
wrote:

>
> I'm not paying $1000 year for AlibreCAM but then I don't have more than
> the 4th axis package nor the lathe feature.
>
> The basic AlibreCAD comes with a simple CAM module.I doubt the low end
> Alibre for under $200 has CAM since that comes from MecSoft.
>
> MecSoft also has CAM support for RhinoCAD and for their own Visual CAD/CAM
> https://mecsoft.com/visualcadcam/
> Starting price is $595.  I've used the VisualCAD.  Not a lot different
> from the AlibreCAM since the basic engine is the same.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ken Strauss [mailto:ken.stra...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: September-17-20 6:56 PM
> > To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> >
> > How do you generate gcode from Alibre? I found
> > https://www.alibre.com/ecosystem-cam/ and AlibreCAM appears to be
> $1000/year
> > to over $21,000. I can afford $199 one time but an annual licence costing
> > thousands is not in my budget!
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: John Dammeyer [mailto:jo...@autoartisans.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:27 PM
> > > To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> > >
> > > There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
> > > If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
> > Less than $200.
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
> > > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> > > >
> > > > Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
> > > > personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file
> after
> > > > October 1, 2020.So download your stuff now.
> > > >
> > > > OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
> > > >
> > > > Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and
> > for
> > > > building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not
> need
> > it
> > > > either.OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the
> > LCNC
> > > > list want CAM.
> > > >
> > > > One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for
> about
> > $270
> > > > but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
> > > >
> > > > What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
> > .STEP
> > > > files from any CAD system.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
> > > > > > Chris,
> > > > > > You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too
> > expensive.
> > > > > > Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
> > > > > > solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual
> feature is
> > > > > > extrusion screws.
> > > > > > Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features.
> Has
> > a
> > > > > > 30 day free demo.
> > > > > > https://www.webersys.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob
> at
> > > > > Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
> > > > > supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
> > > > > features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a
> > couple
> > > > > or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
> > > > > product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
> > > > > Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know i

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[John Dammeyer]

I'm not paying $1000 year for AlibreCAM but then I don't have more than the 4th 
axis package nor the lathe feature.

The basic AlibreCAD comes with a simple CAM module.I doubt the low end 
Alibre for under $200 has CAM since that comes from MecSoft.

MecSoft also has CAM support for RhinoCAD and for their own Visual CAD/CAM
https://mecsoft.com/visualcadcam/
Starting price is $595.  I've used the VisualCAD.  Not a lot different from the 
AlibreCAM since the basic engine is the same.



> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Strauss [mailto:ken.stra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: September-17-20 6:56 PM
> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> 
> How do you generate gcode from Alibre? I found
> https://www.alibre.com/ecosystem-cam/ and AlibreCAM appears to be $1000/year
> to over $21,000. I can afford $199 one time but an annual licence costing
> thousands is not in my budget!
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Dammeyer [mailto:jo...@autoartisans.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:27 PM
> > To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> >
> > There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
> > If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
> Less than $200.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
> > > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> > >
> > > Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
> > > personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file after
> > > October 1, 2020.So download your stuff now.
> > >
> > > OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
> > >
> > > Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and
> for
> > > building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not need
> it
> > > either.OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the
> LCNC
> > > list want CAM.
> > >
> > > One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for about
> $270
> > > but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
> > >
> > > What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
> .STEP
> > > files from any CAD system.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert  wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
> > > > > Chris,
> > > > > You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too
> expensive.
> > > > > Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
> > > > > solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual feature is
> > > > > extrusion screws.
> > > > > Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features. Has
> a
> > > > > 30 day free demo.
> > > > > https://www.webersys.com/
> > > > >
> > > > I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob at
> > > > Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
> > > > supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
> > > > features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a
> couple
> > > > or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
> > > > product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
> > > > Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be
> > > > interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since
> 2015.
> > > > > As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to
> learn.
> > > > >
> > > > > YMMV
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > > > >> No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
> > > > >> lathes that runs on Linux.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/.
> But
> > > > >> unlike
> > > > >> Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths
> >

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

In your case, you might want DS Solidworks.  I've been reading CAD system
specs and web sites for hours now and the ones that do have CAM are
limited.  Except for Solidworks.  They use SW to make things like rocket
engines for SpaceX boosters and car plants at GM.

SW can drive a 5-axis mill but I don't know what limits are.  I know it can
do 3+2 milling

FreeCAD is limited to 2.5 axis and some limited 3 axis milling.

OnShape requires 3rd party CAM solutions.

It might be worth buying an EAA membership then enrolling in the
"Solidworks University" program.  But it would take months to work through
all their training materials.



On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 6:08 PM Frank Tkalcevic 
wrote:

> > The feature they are taking away is the ability to save your files to an
> > industry-standard STEP file.  Unless you pay for a license.
>
> That's one that's going to hit me.  I always expected the free version to
> disappear, so I never invested much time in the CAD.  I've been using F360
> to import STL files and export them as STEP/IGES.  I'm not sure how I'm
> going to do this now.
>
> The other killer is 4th and 5th axis CAM.  I can still import STEP and
> output 3D gcode (and turn), but I just started collecting parts for a 5th
> axis trunnion for my hobby CNC router.  :(
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Ken Strauss]

How do you generate gcode from Alibre? I found
https://www.alibre.com/ecosystem-cam/ and AlibreCAM appears to be $1000/year
to over $21,000. I can afford $199 one time but an annual licence costing
thousands is not in my budget!

> -Original Message-
> From: John Dammeyer [mailto:jo...@autoartisans.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 8:27 PM
> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)'
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
>
> There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/
> If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.
Less than $200.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> >
> > Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
> > personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file after
> > October 1, 2020.So download your stuff now.
> >
> > OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
> >
> > Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and
for
> > building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not need
it
> > either.OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the
LCNC
> > list want CAM.
> >
> > One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for about
$270
> > but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
> >
> > What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts
.STEP
> > files from any CAD system.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
> > > > Chris,
> > > > You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too
expensive.
> > > > Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
> > > > solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual feature is
> > > > extrusion screws.
> > > > Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features. Has
a
> > > > 30 day free demo.
> > > > https://www.webersys.com/
> > > >
> > > I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob at
> > > Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
> > > supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
> > > features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a
couple
> > > or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
> > > product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
> > > Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be
> > > interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since
2015.
> > > > As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to
learn.
> > > >
> > > > YMMV
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > > > On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > > >> No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
> > > >> lathes that runs on Linux.
> > > >>
> > > >> The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/.
But
> > > >> unlike
> > > >> Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths
> > > >> unless
> > > >> you get some 3rd party add-in software.
> > > >>
> > > >> I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux
based
> > > >> 16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.
> > > >> Onshape
> > > >> on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've
not
> > > >> figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.
> > > >>
> > > >> Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done
for
> > > >> complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof"
that
> > > >> g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.
> > > >>
> > > >> One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC,
installing
> > > >> Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a
rarely
> > > >> powerful Linux PC.
> > > >> (At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and S

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Frank Tkalcevic]

> The feature they are taking away is the ability to save your files to an
> industry-standard STEP file.  Unless you pay for a license.

That's one that's going to hit me.  I always expected the free version to 
disappear, so I never invested much time in the CAD.  I've been using F360 to 
import STL files and export them as STEP/IGES.  I'm not sure how I'm going to 
do this now.

The other killer is 4th and 5th axis CAM.  I can still import STEP and output 
3D gcode (and turn), but I just started collecting parts for a 5th axis 
trunnion for my hobby CNC router.  :(

Frank



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[John Dammeyer]

There's always the less functional https://www.alibre.com/atom3d/ 
If can export step and stl files. You pay for it and use it off line.  Less 
than $200.

> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: September-17-20 5:04 PM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> 
> Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
> personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file after
> October 1, 2020.So download your stuff now.
> 
> OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.
> 
> Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and for
> building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not need it
> either.OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the LCNC
> list want CAM.
> 
> One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for about $270
> but will go back to $495/yr at some point.
> 
> What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts .STEP
> files from any CAD system.
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert  wrote:
> 
> >
> > On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
> > > Chris,
> > > You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too expensive.
> > > Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
> > > solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual feature is
> > > extrusion screws.
> > > Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features. Has a
> > > 30 day free demo.
> > > https://www.webersys.com/
> > >
> > I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob at
> > Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
> > supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
> > features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a couple
> > or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
> > product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
> > Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be
> > interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since 2015.
> > > As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to learn.
> > >
> > > YMMV
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > >> No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
> > >> lathes that runs on Linux.
> > >>
> > >> The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/. But
> > >> unlike
> > >> Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths
> > >> unless
> > >> you get some 3rd party add-in software.
> > >>
> > >> I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux based
> > >> 16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.
> > >> Onshape
> > >> on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've not
> > >> figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.
> > >>
> > >> Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done for
> > >> complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof" that
> > >> g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.
> > >>
> > >> One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC, installing
> > >> Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a rarely
> > >> powerful Linux PC.
> > >> (At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)
> > >>
> > >> I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a long
> > >> time and
> > >> before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I wanted to
> > >> edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the only
> > >> game in
> > >> town for professional-level media editing unless you consider Apple's
> > >> Final
> > >> Cut Pro X.None of this runs on Linux.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > >>>> Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free
> > >>>> even for
> > >>>> commercial use un

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

Fusion360 just made changes that in my opinion kill the product for
personal use.  You can not save your work locally as a STEP file after
October 1, 2020.So download your stuff now.

OnShape and Solidworks look like good options.

Solidworks is used for thinks like rocket engine design at SpaceX and for
building cars at GM.  You are not going to outgrow it but may not need it
either.OnShape does not have native CAM.  I assume people on the LCNC
list want CAM.

One opinion is to just pay for Fusion360.  It is on sale now for about $270
but will go back to $495/yr at some point.

What is REALLY needed is a good open source CAM system that accepts .STEP
files from any CAD system.



On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:28 PM hubert  wrote:

>
> On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:
> > Chris,
> > You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too expensive.
> > Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe,
> > solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual feature is
> > extrusion screws.
> > Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features. Has a
> > 30 day free demo.
> > https://www.webersys.com/
> >
> I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob at
> Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still
> supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other
> features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a couple
> or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX
> product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under
> Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be
> interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since 2015.
> > As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to learn.
> >
> > YMMV
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> >> No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
> >> lathes that runs on Linux.
> >>
> >> The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/. But
> >> unlike
> >> Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths
> >> unless
> >> you get some 3rd party add-in software.
> >>
> >> I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux based
> >> 16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.
> >> Onshape
> >> on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've not
> >> figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.
> >>
> >> Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done for
> >> complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof" that
> >> g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.
> >>
> >> One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC, installing
> >> Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a rarely
> >> powerful Linux PC.
> >> (At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)
> >>
> >> I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a long
> >> time and
> >> before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I wanted to
> >> edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the only
> >> game in
> >> town for professional-level media editing unless you consider Apple's
> >> Final
> >> Cut Pro X.None of this runs on Linux.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C  wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
>  Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free
>  even for
>  commercial use until you make $50K using it.
> 
>  Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
>  supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.
> 
> >>> I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?
> >>>
> >>>
> 
>  On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling
> > them on
> > a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
> >
> >
> > I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard,
> > that
> > you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.
> >
> >
> > What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
> > that will create g-code for it?
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> Emc-users mailing list
> >>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@li

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[hubert]

On 9/17/20 11:30 AM, dave engvall wrote:

Chris,
You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too expensive. 
Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe, 
solids,  turning and probably something i missed. Unusual feature is 
extrusion screws.
Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features. Has a 
30 day free demo.

https://www.webersys.com/

I used to use Synergy but changed to Fusion 360.  I talked to Bob at 
Weber Systems today and it is now down to just Him.  While still 
supports current customers he is encouraging those who need other 
features to look elsewhere.  He lost his Longtime cohort Larry a couple 
or years ago but he is now retirement age.  It was a long time UNIX 
product but hasn't transitioned to 64 bit.  He is running it under 
Ubuntu 16.04 but had trouble with 18.  I don't know if he would be 
interested in passing the product on, but he hasn't updated since 2015.

As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to learn.

YMMV

Dave

On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
lathes that runs on Linux.

The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/. But 
unlike
Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths 
unless

you get some 3rd party add-in software.

I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux based
16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.  
Onshape

on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've not
figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.

Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done for
complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof" that
g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.

One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC, installing
Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a rarely
powerful Linux PC.
(At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)

I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a long 
time and

before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I wanted to
edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the only 
game in
town for professional-level media editing unless you consider Apple's 
Final

Cut Pro X.    None of this runs on Linux.


On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C  wrote:


On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free 
even for

commercial use until you make $50K using it.

Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.


I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?




On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling 
them on

a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.


I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, 
that

you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.


What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
that will create g-code for it?


thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users







___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

The feature they are taking away is the ability to save your files to an
industry-standard STEP file.  Unless you pay for a license.

You have until Oct 1 to download your files.

I read that the EAA server crashed recently.   Apparently many Fusion users
are moving there.



On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:02 PM Greg Bernard  wrote:

> I ran Fusion for over a year on the free "startup" license until it
> expired. I had downloaded my files to local storage so I had them to use in
> the future. I later returned to Fusion on a monthly basis to continue some
> work and found all my files were still intact when I reactivated my
> account. Since I only need Fusion periodically I'll continue using it on an
> "as needed" basis, always backing my files locally, of course.
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 11:05 AM Jon Elson  wrote:
>
> > On 09/17/2020 03:37 AM, peterjohnhodg...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I used to use Fusion 360 but they stopped my free licence
> > > when they looked at my website and found I did some ‘job
> > > shopping’ _regardless of turn over_. I wasn’t prepared to
> > > pay the $50 per month so I lost all my Fusion drawings. Be
> > > careful!!!
> > >
> > *** THIS *** is the kicker!  Not that you someday might not
> > be able to use the package anymore, but that ALL THE WORK
> > you did with it may become unavailable.  That's a REAL
> > downside to "free".
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Greg Bernard]

I ran Fusion for over a year on the free "startup" license until it
expired. I had downloaded my files to local storage so I had them to use in
the future. I later returned to Fusion on a monthly basis to continue some
work and found all my files were still intact when I reactivated my
account. Since I only need Fusion periodically I'll continue using it on an
"as needed" basis, always backing my files locally, of course.

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 11:05 AM Jon Elson  wrote:

> On 09/17/2020 03:37 AM, peterjohnhodg...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > I used to use Fusion 360 but they stopped my free licence
> > when they looked at my website and found I did some ‘job
> > shopping’ _regardless of turn over_. I wasn’t prepared to
> > pay the $50 per month so I lost all my Fusion drawings. Be
> > careful!!!
> >
> *** THIS *** is the kicker!  Not that you someday might not
> be able to use the package anymore, but that ALL THE WORK
> you did with it may become unavailable.  That's a REAL
> downside to "free".
>
> Jon
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[N]

> ...
> The problem with open source CAD is you need a sponsor.  The best example
> is when KiCAD picked on CERN (The big European physic lab) as a paying
> sponsor.   The quality of KiCAD jumped upward dramatically when they were
> able to hire full-time people.

Or time. picked CERN as paying sponsor, would guess peopple at CERN would make 
an excellent work themselves if money where spent on some extra staff.

> Also, professional users want professional-level support.  You can be
> paying a $120K/year engineer to post questions on public forums and hope
> some other engineer is able to help.   It is worth paying for tech support
> if your users are on salary.

Know anybody who want to pay $112K/year?

> Many people here, I assume have never seen good, first-tier technical
> support.   I used to write software and many times I'd fly out to
> the user's site in Europe, the US, or Korea and just talk to them about
> what they needed and watch them work.  Our customers paid 7 or 8 digit
> prices and got what they asked for and quite a lot more.

Seems to be good business to sell support, happen to know it happen to know if 
it happen wooden head get support while others have to get by without, would 
expect this business model would be particularly good then selling consulting 
work.

> Even open source projects need money coming in.  The big ones find ways to
> generate income, usually by consulting work.

Less money need to be spent if using open source, drawback may be software not 
equally good although differences is shrinking and some time need to be spent 
on improvements which will also benefit others.


Nicklas Karlsson


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

The problem is keeping Fusion 360 going does requires about 40 full-time
staff.  Fusion 360 has about a 6% or 7% market share but the vast majority
of users are not paying.The company can afford the loss because they
also sell Autocad.

The problem with open source CAD is you need a sponsor.  The best example
is when KiCAD picked on CERN (The big European physic lab) as a paying
sponsor.   The quality of KiCAD jumped upward dramatically when they were
able to hire full-time people.

Also, professional users want professional-level support.  You can be
paying a $120K/year engineer to post questions on public forums and hope
some other engineer is able to help.   It is worth paying for tech support
if your users are on salary.

Many people here, I assume have never seen good, first-tier technical
support.   I used to write software and many times I'd fly out to
the user's site in Europe, the US, or Korea and just talk to them about
what they needed and watch them work.  Our customers paid 7 or 8 digit
prices and got what they asked for and quite a lot more.

Even open source projects need money coming in.  The big ones find ways to
generate income, usually by consulting work.

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:12 AM N  wrote:

> > > ...
> > > > I used to use Fusion 360 ...  I wasn�t prepared to pay the $50 per
> month so I lost all my
> > > > Fusion drawings. Be careful!!!
> > >
> > > I had the same issue with Alibre once, so don't really trust them
> either.
> > >
> > As was expected, I believe AlibreCAD was always designed to be sold.
>
> They need some way to earn money as everyone else but it's not possible to
> write some software and live on it forever, over time it is leaning towards
> open source. Maybe with some luck it will be possible to work shorter days
> then there is less need to write new software and other development, though
> still need to know how to use it.
>
>
> Nicklas Karlsson
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[N]

> > ...
> > > I used to use Fusion 360 ...  I wasn�t prepared to pay the $50 per month 
> > > so I lost all my
> > > Fusion drawings. Be careful!!!
> > 
> > I had the same issue with Alibre once, so don't really trust them either.
> > 
> As was expected, I believe AlibreCAD was always designed to be sold.

They need some way to earn money as everyone else but it's not possible to 
write some software and live on it forever, over time it is leaning towards 
open source. Maybe with some luck it will be possible to work shorter days then 
there is less need to write new software and other development, though still 
need to know how to use it.


Nicklas Karlsson


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[dave engvall]

Chris,
You might try Synergy, does the whole ball of wax. Not too expensive. 
Takes time to learn. Parasolids based. 2D, 2.5D, 3D, wireframe, solids,  
turning and probably something i missed. Unusual feature is extrusion 
screws.
Runs on linux; will run on Windows but you lose a few features. Has a 30 
day free demo.

https://www.webersys.com/

As far a photoshop; gimp is pretty good but maybe not so easy to learn.

YMMV

Dave

On 9/16/20 12:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
lathes that runs on Linux.

The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/. But unlike
Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths unless
you get some 3rd party add-in software.

I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux based
16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.  Onshape
on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've not
figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.

Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done for
complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof" that
g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.

One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC, installing
Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a rarely
powerful Linux PC.
(At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)

I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a long time and
before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I wanted to
edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the only game in
town for professional-level media editing unless you consider Apple's Final
Cut Pro X.None of this runs on Linux.


On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C  wrote:


On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free even for
commercial use until you make $50K using it.

Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.


I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?




On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.


I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that
you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.


What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
that will create g-code for it?


thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users







___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

I just posted a legal way to get Solidworks for $40 which is close enough
to free.

Back to Fusion360.   You should not have lost your drawings.   They can be
saved locally as .STEP files.  Step files are universal and can be imported
to just about any CAD system.

Yes they do charge for Fusion if you make money with it.  The threshold
used to be $50K then that changed to a $100K threshold but now they judge
if you are still in "startup" mode or if you are an established business.
  The paid license is only $495 per year and if you are using Fusion to
earn $100K you can afford $495.

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:40 AM  wrote:

>
> I use Alibre Atom 3D CAD package which I find excellent and is a very
> cheap one time purchase. There is a CAM package too but it’s more
> expensive.
>
> I used to use Fusion 360 but they stopped my free licence when they
> looked at my website and found I did some ‘job shopping’ _regardless of
> turn over_. I wasn’t prepared to pay the $50 per month so I lost all my
> Fusion drawings. Be careful!!!
>
> I am a newbie to CNC machining but like Andy and the others say it’s
> best and quite easy to learn G-Code and routines for turning especially
> once you have a few templates you can just modify.
>
> Andy’s macro addon to LCNC axis is very good too.
>
> Pete
>
> > On 16 Sep 2020, at 11:44, N  wrote:
> >
> > 
> >> Hello,
> >> I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
> >> a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
> >> I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard,
> >> that you can't really make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.
> >
> > Also used Freecad a little bit. Suspect rotating a sketch is a good or
> > very good method to draw parts for a lathe. Do know anything about how
> > CAM, the path workbench will work a lathe but should be simple to try.
> >
> > As someone pointed out Fusion 360 might be better but CAD software
> > usually also tend to be rather expensive.
> >
> >
> > Regards Nicklas Karlsson
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[John Dammeyer]

> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: September-17-20 1:49 AM
> To: phodg...@uk22.net; Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe
> 
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 09:40,  wrote:
> 
> > I used to use Fusion 360 ...  I wasn�t prepared to pay the $50 per month so 
> > I lost all my
> > Fusion drawings. Be careful!!!
> 
> I had the same issue with Alibre once, so don't really trust them either.
> 
As was expected, I believe AlibreCAD was always designed to be sold.  And that 
they did to3D Systems and it became Geomagic.  The advantage with Geomagic is 
that it allowed USB based dongles for the license and it could import 3D 
slicing files.  The Mecsoft changed over to their standalone package for a 
while.

Ultimately, Geomagic languished with very few upgrades or bug fixes and the 
original authors bought it back.  The dongles became useless and MecSoft 
reintegrated AlibreCAM into AlibreCAD.

I now have the 4th Axis version of AlibreCAM (MecsoftCAM) and just received the 
invoice for another year for $400.  I think I'll pay it for one more year while 
I wait and see how other CAD/CAM systems play out.

This stuff isn't cheap but like anything from a musical instrument to ballroom 
dancing, it requires constant practice to stay competent.   And if you can do 
one project for someone that pays $400 for machine time etc. then consider the 
CAM software free.

John


> But saying "Don't use CAM, use hand-coding" seems a bit of a stretch.
> (Though G72 can make that more plausible on a lathe  than complex 3D
> milling on a mill)
> 
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> � George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
> 
> 
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Jon Elson]

On 09/17/2020 03:37 AM, peterjohnhodg...@gmail.com wrote:



I used to use Fusion 360 but they stopped my free licence 
when they looked at my website and found I did some ‘job 
shopping’ _regardless of turn over_. I wasn’t prepared to 
pay the $50 per month so I lost all my Fusion drawings. Be 
careful!!!


*** THIS *** is the kicker!  Not that you someday might not 
be able to use the package anymore, but that ALL THE WORK 
you did with it may become unavailable.  That's a REAL 
downside to "free".


Jon


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 09:40,  wrote:

> I used to use Fusion 360 ...  I wasn’t prepared to pay the $50 per month so I 
> lost all my
> Fusion drawings. Be careful!!!

I had the same issue with Alibre once, so don't really trust them either.

But saying "Don't use CAM, use hand-coding" seems a bit of a stretch.
(Though G72 can make that more plausible on a lathe  than complex 3D
milling on a mill)

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[peterjohnhodgson]

I use Alibre Atom 3D CAD package which I find excellent and is a very 
cheap one time purchase. There is a CAM package too but it’s more 
expensive.


I used to use Fusion 360 but they stopped my free licence when they 
looked at my website and found I did some ‘job shopping’ _regardless of 
turn over_. I wasn’t prepared to pay the $50 per month so I lost all my 
Fusion drawings. Be careful!!!


I am a newbie to CNC machining but like Andy and the others say it’s 
best and quite easy to learn G-Code and routines for turning especially 
once you have a few templates you can just modify.


Andy’s macro addon to LCNC axis is very good too.

Pete


On 16 Sep 2020, at 11:44, N  wrote:



Hello,
I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, 
that you can't really make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.


Also used Freecad a little bit. Suspect rotating a sketch is a good or 
very good method to draw parts for a lathe. Do know anything about how 
CAM, the path workbench will work a lathe but should be simple to try.


As someone pointed out Fusion 360 might be better but CAD software 
usually also tend to be rather expensive.



Regards Nicklas Karlsson


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 07:12, Chris Albertson  wrote:
>
> Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free even for
> commercial use until you make $50K using it.

Though the internet is aflame with news that Autodesk have announced
that they have turned evil (as predited) with the F360 license.

In reality I think that they are just trying to make the delta between
free and paid bigger to encourage more paid subscriptions. But till
things settle down I probably wouldn't suggest getting too tied-in to
F360.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Rafael Skodlar]

Hi Ron,

Here is how I searched for what you are trying to do if I understand you 
right.


CLI is the best way to manage software in my experience. I rarely use 
GUI utility even in Kubuntu workstation.


As a root in my Kubuntu I have the following aliases:
alias acse='apt-cache search '
alias acsh='apt-cache show '
alias agar='apt-get autoremove'
alias agd='apt-get dist-upgrade'
alias agg='apt-get upgrade '
alias agi='apt-get install '
alias agr='apt-get remove'
alias agu='apt-get update '
alias asv='apt-show-versions -p'

On 9/15/20 9:37 PM, R C wrote:

Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on 
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.


I tried to get used to FreeCAD too but takes more time than I can 
dedicate at this point.





I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that 
you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.


So for program or related library search I do it this way:
* command
acse lathe

That returns more or less related lines with a description like this:

dxf2gcode - prepares drawings of parts for automatic machine tools
php-tcpdf - PHP class for generating PDF files on-the-fly
ruby-ami - Ruby client library for the Asterisk Management Interface

next command will tell me more about some related package:
acsh dxf2gcode

Homepage: https://sourceforge.net/p/dxf2gcode/wiki/Home/
Description-en: prepares drawings of parts for automatic machine tools
 This program reads 2D mechanical drawings of parts to be fabricated
 and produces G-code tool movement instructions for running on automatic
 machine tools (CNC machines) such as milling machines and lathes.
 .
 This is a graphical CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) program.
 It accepts input in DXF, PDF, or Postscript format.  It supports 
milling, drilling, and turning operations, as well as work-holding tabs.


I did not include lines with checksums etc. to make it clearer here.

What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe, 
that will create g-code for it?


"It accepts input in DXF, PDF, or Postscript format.  It supports 
milling, drilling, and turning operations, as well as work-holding tabs."


That's impressive assuming it work as described.

-
To install the program I would use the command:
agi dxf2gcode

After that you can execute it from CLI or GUI menu.

Of course there is option to install as a unprivileged user:

sudo apt install dxf2gcode
but I'm trying to save keyboard keys ;-)



thanks,


Ron


I have not tried to install and try this program yet but might do it in 
one of my VMs later.


Searching for CAD I received one related app among other things:
solvespace - Parametric 2d/3d CAD

If the output is too long you may narrow it down with
acse cad | grep CAD

here's a description for solvespace:

Homepage: http://solvespace.com
Description-en: Parametric 2d/3d CAD
 SolveSpace is a parametric 2d/3d CAD program. Applications include:
 .
  * modeling 3d parts — draw with extrudes, revolves, and Boolean
(union / difference) operations;
  * modeling 2d parts — draw the part as a single section, and export DXF,
PDF, SVG; use 3d assembly to verify fit;
  * 3d-printed parts — export the STL or other triangle mesh expected by
most 3d printers;
  * preparing CAM data — export 2d vector art for a waterjet machine or
laser cutter; or generate STEP or STL, for import into third-party
CAM software for machining;
  * mechanism design — use the constraint solver to simulate planar or
spatial linkages, with pin, ball, or slide joints;
  * plane and solid geometry — replace hand-solved trigonometry and
spreadsheets with a live dimensioned drawing.

The best test would be to see how the generated (awful) G-code would 
behave in LinuxCNC of course.


This also reminded me about a book I bought in 1990s: The CNC Workbook 
(Addison Wesley 65600) that came with a floppy for DOS program. I 
misplaced the floppy but remember there was a program to simulate CNC 
lathe. Very good book with labs to learn CNC basics.


Good luck,
--
Rafael


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
lathes that runs on Linux.

The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/. But unlike
Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths unless
you get some 3rd party add-in software.

I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux based
16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.  Onshape
on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've not
figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.

Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done for
complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof" that
g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.


I have a few dual cpu xeon machines, with 384Gb ram, but  not ideal to 
run VMs. I use disk trays, so I could just  use one of them to install 
windows on it,  but I hate windows, especially win10




One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC, installing
Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a rarely
powerful Linux PC.
(At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)

I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a long time and
before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I wanted to
edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the only game in
town for professional-level media editing unless you consider Apple's Final
Cut Pro X.None of this runs on Linux.


I have been doing *Nix for 30 some odd years, and work in HPC since a 
while..   we do A LOT of image processing, make movies etc


on Linux clusters but that's not a home solution, not even for B. Gates.


On my linux boxes at home I use Gimp, but I am not relly into graphics 
editing though.






On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C  wrote:


On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free even for
commercial use until you make $50K using it.

Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.


I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?




On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.


I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that
you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.


What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
that will create g-code for it?


thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users






___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

well, I was thinking, this morning  that if you can make a part by 
rotating it, in freecad, you can also extrude it a bit and then create 
code for a mill.


If the steps/overlap would be small, then  one would end up with 
something that can be used on a mill, with some adaptations/translations?



Of course ..  that idea probably  is asking for trouble.



On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
lathes that runs on Linux.

The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/. But unlike
Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths unless
you get some 3rd party add-in software.

I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux based
16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.  Onshape
on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've not
figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.

Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done for
complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof" that
g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.

One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC, installing
Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a rarely
powerful Linux PC.
(At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)

I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a long time and
before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I wanted to
edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the only game in
town for professional-level media editing unless you consider Apple's Final
Cut Pro X.None of this runs on Linux.


On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C  wrote:


On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free even for
commercial use until you make $50K using it.

Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.


I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?




On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.


I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that
you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.


What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
that will create g-code for it?


thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users






___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

No.  I don't know of any CAM software for generating toolpaths for
lathes that runs on Linux.

The best 3D CAD that runs on Linux is  https://www.onshape.com/. But unlike
Fusion360, Onshape does not have the ability to generate toolpaths unless
you get some 3rd party add-in software.

I have two computers here.  An iMac for most things and a Linux based
16-core Xeon PC with nVidia GPU for robotics software development.  Onshape
on the Xeon is 10X faster than Fusion on my older iMac   But I've not
figured out a good way to translate the Onshape models to g-code.

Gene suggests wring g-code by hand but that simply can't be done for
complex parts and even if one could do this there is no "proof" that
g-code I write is the same as what I designed in the CAD system.

One solution is running a virtual machine on the Linux PC, installing
Windows 10  on that and then Fusion360.   But this requires a rarely
powerful Linux PC.
(At least as a minimum, a 4-core i7 with 16GB RAM and SSD.)

I've been a Linux user (both professional and at home) for a long time and
before Linux existed,  BSD UNIX and Solaris but then one day I wanted to
edit video and process images shot with an SLR.   Adobe is the only game in
town for professional-level media editing unless you consider Apple's Final
Cut Pro X.None of this runs on Linux.


On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:38 PM R C  wrote:

>
> On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free even for
> > commercial use until you make $50K using it.
> >
> > Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
> > supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.
> >
>
> I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
> >> a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that
> >> you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.
> >>
> >>
> >> What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
> >> that will create g-code for it?
> >>
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >> Ron
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Emc-users mailing list
> >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >>
> >
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Gene Heskett]

On Wednesday 16 September 2020 14:51:59 R C wrote:

> On 9/16/20 12:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 September 2020 10:02:25 R C wrote:
> >> yesterday, I noticed some electronics in my little lathe
> >> fried/died, after I fix that I'll try to use it.
> >
> > Everybody knows this stuff runs on smoke & mirrors, so what did you
> > do to break the mirror & let the smoke out?
>
> Hahaha ...
>
> well,  they are sherline machines, in Paxton/Patterson enclosures, and
> I took out that optistep stuff, well, pretty much took
>
> everything out except the motor controller.
>
> Then I  build everything over, experimentally, with some cheap chinese
> components, like voltage regulators etc, and it seemed to be working
>
> and decided I redo it the right way later.
>
>
> And apparently yesterday it was later  ...   *lol*
>
Chuckle.  As a CET I had to ask, but forgot the smiley, my bad.  As a 
side comment, I have around a ten pack of the 2M542 drivers in service, 
the first 7 pack for over a decade now, zero failures.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

On 9/16/20 12:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Wednesday 16 September 2020 10:02:25 R C wrote:


yesterday, I noticed some electronics in my little lathe fried/died,
after I fix that I'll try to use it.


Everybody knows this stuff runs on smoke & mirrors, so what did you do to
break the mirror & let the smoke out?

btw:  I think that the high summer temperatures, it either being humid, 
or with AC dry and static didn't help much either, that


and some  thunderstorms in the mix .

up here where I live, we constantly have cooling issues with computing 
equipment etc, (there's 30% less air than at sea level), there


were several 'cooling incidents' around that time, where I work




On 9/16/20 7:45 AM, andy pugh wrote:

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:45, R C  wrote:

that sounds like something I had in mind, well, either that or just
design a part with "something"

You can try it out, there is a gmoccapy simulator sample package
using it. (Which, thinking about it, means that the base files must
be in LinuxCNC now)

Which further means that I ought to fix the bug that one of the
feed-per-rev boxes doesn't work.

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

On 9/16/20 12:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Wednesday 16 September 2020 10:02:25 R C wrote:


yesterday, I noticed some electronics in my little lathe fried/died,
after I fix that I'll try to use it.


Everybody knows this stuff runs on smoke & mirrors, so what did you do to
break the mirror & let the smoke out?


Hahaha ...

well,  they are sherline machines, in Paxton/Patterson enclosures, and I 
took out that optistep stuff, well, pretty much took


everything out except the motor controller.

Then I  build everything over, experimentally, with some cheap chinese 
components, like voltage regulators etc, and it seemed to be working


and decided I redo it the right way later.


And apparently yesterday it was later  ...   *lol*




On 9/16/20 7:45 AM, andy pugh wrote:

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:45, R C  wrote:

that sounds like something I had in mind, well, either that or just
design a part with "something"

You can try it out, there is a gmoccapy simulator sample package
using it. (Which, thinking about it, means that the base files must
be in LinuxCNC now)

Which further means that I ought to fix the bug that one of the
feed-per-rev boxes doesn't work.

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Gene Heskett]

On Wednesday 16 September 2020 10:02:25 R C wrote:

> yesterday, I noticed some electronics in my little lathe fried/died,
> after I fix that I'll try to use it.
>
Everybody knows this stuff runs on smoke & mirrors, so what did you do to 
break the mirror & let the smoke out?

> On 9/16/20 7:45 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:45, R C  wrote:
> >> that sounds like something I had in mind, well, either that or just
> >> design a part with "something"
> >
> > You can try it out, there is a gmoccapy simulator sample package
> > using it. (Which, thinking about it, means that the base files must
> > be in LinuxCNC now)
> >
> > Which further means that I ought to fix the bug that one of the
> > feed-per-rev boxes doesn't work.
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

yesterday, I noticed some electronics in my little lathe fried/died, 
after I fix that I'll try to use it.




On 9/16/20 7:45 AM, andy pugh wrote:

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:45, R C  wrote:


that sounds like something I had in mind, well, either that or just
design a part with "something"

You can try it out, there is a gmoccapy simulator sample package using it.
(Which, thinking about it, means that the base files must be in LinuxCNC now)

Which further means that I ought to fix the bug that one of the
feed-per-rev boxes doesn't work.




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 14:45, R C  wrote:

> that sounds like something I had in mind, well, either that or just
> design a part with "something"

You can try it out, there is a gmoccapy simulator sample package using it.
(Which, thinking about it, means that the base files must be in LinuxCNC now)

Which further means that I ought to fix the bug that one of the
feed-per-rev boxes doesn't work.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

I actually read something about how to do that, but one would need a 
plugin for the path workbench, and read is was not that reliable?


I did play with rotating parts etc in freecad


On 9/16/20 4:42 AM, N wrote:

Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.


I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that
you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.

Also used Freecad a little bit. Suspect rotating a sketch is a good or very 
good method to draw parts for a lathe. Do know anything about how CAM, the path 
workbench will work a lathe but should be simple to try.

As someone pointed out Fusion 360 might be better but CAD software usually also 
tend to be rather expensive.


Regards Nicklas Karlsson


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

Hi Andy,


that sounds like something I had in mind, well, either that or just 
design a part with "something"


Things I am planning on doing on a lathe are rather simple, I want to 
make a little shaft with different


diameters in some places.



On 9/16/20 2:34 AM, andy pugh wrote:

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 07:38, R C  wrote:


Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but ...

I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?

No. Which looks like a deliberate choice as it _does_ run natively
(and nicely) on OSX.

It makes decent G-code, but I rarely bother.

For almost everything I make on the lathe I work _at_ the lathe and use:
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/41-guis/26550-lathe-macros?start=0
Which is a lot like using a manual lathe, but with a hyper-capable power feed.

For example, making an ER20 collet last night. I used "face" on the
end of the bar. Drilled a hole with the tailstock, then used a "bore"
cycle to make a counterbore for the (special) nut, then another boring
cycle with an 8 degree taper for the collet socket, followed by a
threading cycle to finish it off.

Also, the master branch contains the G70 / 71 / 72 lathe cycles:
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/gcode/g-code.html#gcode:g70

Basically you define the profile with G1, G2, G3 lines and arcs in a
subroutine and LinuxCNC makes that shape.

The documentation for the actual implementation is rather poor. There
is better documentation for a _different_ implementation with many of
the letters allocated to different functions here:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/andypugh/g71type2remap/docs/src/gcode/g-code.txt#g71-lathe-roughing-cycle-turning




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[N]

> It's often easier to hand write code for simpler jobs or use the machine 
> in a mix of manual and MDI. It is well worth adding a couple of 
> electronic handwheels. You end up with the hands on feel of a manual 
> with the power of a CNC. Andy's macros look awesome. I must give them a try.
> 
> For more complex stuff CAM is the only practical solution. I do quite a 
> bit of curvy decorative work and it would be a nightmare to hand code.
> There aren't many decent lathe CAM packages out there that don't involve 
> getting a mortgage. Fusion is pretty impressive though you need 
> Windows/Mac to run it.

Have som ideas but to many other things, installed a door to keep noise from 
children away, it may have positive impact.


Nicklas Karlsson


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Les Newell]

It's often easier to hand write code for simpler jobs or use the machine 
in a mix of manual and MDI. It is well worth adding a couple of 
electronic handwheels. You end up with the hands on feel of a manual 
with the power of a CNC. Andy's macros look awesome. I must give them a try.


For more complex stuff CAM is the only practical solution. I do quite a 
bit of curvy decorative work and it would be a nightmare to hand code.
There aren't many decent lathe CAM packages out there that don't involve 
getting a mortgage. Fusion is pretty impressive though you need 
Windows/Mac to run it.


Les




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[N]

> Hello,
> 
> 
> I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on 
> a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
> 
> 
> I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that  
> you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.

Also used Freecad a little bit. Suspect rotating a sketch is a good or very 
good method to draw parts for a lathe. Do know anything about how CAM, the path 
workbench will work a lathe but should be simple to try.

As someone pointed out Fusion 360 might be better but CAD software usually also 
tend to be rather expensive.


Regards Nicklas Karlsson


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[andy pugh]

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 07:38, R C  wrote:

> > Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but ...

> I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?

No. Which looks like a deliberate choice as it _does_ run natively
(and nicely) on OSX.

It makes decent G-code, but I rarely bother.

For almost everything I make on the lathe I work _at_ the lathe and use:
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/41-guis/26550-lathe-macros?start=0
Which is a lot like using a manual lathe, but with a hyper-capable power feed.

For example, making an ER20 collet last night. I used "face" on the
end of the bar. Drilled a hole with the tailstock, then used a "bore"
cycle to make a counterbore for the (special) nut, then another boring
cycle with an 8 degree taper for the collet socket, followed by a
threading cycle to finish it off.

Also, the master branch contains the G70 / 71 / 72 lathe cycles:
http://linuxcnc.org/docs/devel/html/gcode/g-code.html#gcode:g70

Basically you define the profile with G1, G2, G3 lines and arcs in a
subroutine and LinuxCNC makes that shape.

The documentation for the actual implementation is rather poor. There
is better documentation for a _different_ implementation with many of
the letters allocated to different functions here:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/blob/andypugh/g71type2remap/docs/src/gcode/g-code.txt#g71-lathe-roughing-cycle-turning

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

On 9/16/20 12:09 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free even for
commercial use until you make $50K using it.

Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.



I have heard about that one.   does it run on Linux too?





On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.


I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that
you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.


What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
that will create g-code for it?


thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users






___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Chris Albertson]

Fusion 360 can generate g-code for mills and lathes.  It's free even for
commercial use until you make $50K using it.

Fusion is a little bit like Freecad but is more complete and better
supported as you would expect of a product from Autodesk.




On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM R C  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on
> a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
>
>
> I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that
> you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.
>
>
> What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
> that will create g-code for it?
>
>
> thanks,
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Re: [Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[Gene Heskett]

On Wednesday 16 September 2020 00:37:08 R C wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them
> on a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.
>
>
> I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard,
> that  you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.
>
>
> What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe,
> that will create g-code for it?
>
Best is learning how to write gcode, Ron.

LinuxCNC's gcode interpreter is far more capable than the average gcode 
emitter. It understands subroutines, if/then/else, while and 
repeat/until loops. I strapped a dremel handpiece to the head of my old 
micro hf mill, designed to sharpen my carbide tipped table saw blades. 
About 90 lines of code, took nearly 3 days to run.  Sharpest blade ever, 
and outlasted a new version of that same blade by about 10/1.  Had that 
file been unrolled by a cad/cam program it would have been many 
gigabytes of gcode.
>
> thanks,
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

[Emc-users] CAD for parts to make on a lathe

[R C]

Hello,


I have been using freecad for designing parts, and then milling them on 
a sherline mill, getting the hang of that a little bit.



I have a lathe too, that works with CNC linux, but noticed heard, that  
you can't really  make parts, or g-codes, with it for a lathe.



What wold be a good choice for designing, simple, parts for a lathe, 
that will create g-code for it?



thanks,


Ron



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users