[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
First to thanks all on replays. I knew that my solution is not perfect, and I hoped that someone will find better solution (secretly John). @Justin We all fill the pain. My knowledge of jQuery still have boundaries, trick is to find way how to jump over it. @John, Mitch This looks and feels better than my solution. I knew that Apple use same heights, but that was too easy ;). Now I'll try to your accordion transform to inverted one. John, you prove me that jQuery have some secret possibilities that aren't documented (otherwise, they will not be secret :) ). One more thing: In hours of desperation, I tried to make it by mootools. I found mootools is much harder to learn. Last year I spent 3 hours from first opening of jQuery.com until I made tabbed navigation with content loaded via ajax.
[jQuery] Re: Two words for Jquery
js ez -- David Geoffrey Knutzen schreef: Remember, the two words must be less than a total of 20 characters (compressed) :) -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Duymelinck Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 6:41 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Two words for Jquery Javascript Effordless (in most cases) -- David Tane Piper schreef: Bloody Brilliant! (I wonder how many other 2 word ways there are to describe jQuery) On 8/1/07, Richard D. Worth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here here. - Richard On 8/1/07, kiwwwi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jQuery Rocks!! oh... possibly will add two more words; Thank you :) I'm not the best scripter and jquery has simply allowed me to accomplish with my own personal site so much more than I would have otherwise attempted. You people behind jquery are genious and your work is great, thanks. Kiwwwi. -- David Duymelinck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jQuery] Re: Good Javascript editor or IDE?
Hi, What recommendations on JavaScript editors or IDEs does anyone have? gvim, or emacs whichever fits your needs more ;-) Just to have brought up two alternatives to those IDEs packed with special features for everything and everyone but don't adapt to your speciffic needs. Is there something sophisticated enough that can have intellisense with jQuery or my own objects in external js files? I the ability to extend your editor yourself with touring-complete languages is sophisticated enough for you, the two above are for you. Christof
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
Wizzud wrote:
$('table') ... gets all tables
$('table').eq(1) ... gets the second table
$('#formelement').parent().parent().parent() ... gets the 'great-grandad' of
#formelement
or, to look back up the DOM for a table ...
var _find = $('#formelement');
while(!_find.is('table')){ _find = _find.parent(); }
...but I would recommend putting another test in this loop, just in case
#formelement doesn't have a table above it!
$('#formelement').parents('table:eq(0)');
--Klaus
[jQuery] jquery.flickr + reflection
Hi,
Im trying to use the http://cow.neondragon.net/stuff/reflection/ reflection
plugin with the http://www.projectatomic.com/flickr/#a_code flickr plugin
but no reflection is added.
How I have it setup at the moment is once the html is loaded, load a set of
flickr images then add a class called reflect to all img tags on the
document like so.
$(document).ready(function()
{
$('#gallery').flickr({
api_key: 'api key',
type: 'search',
user_id: 'users id',
tags: 'siskin',
thumb_size: 's',
litebox: true
});
$('img').addClass('reflect');
});
The problem is it only adds a reflection to images that are not loaded using
the flickr plugin. You can see this in http://b0bd0gz.adsl24.co.uk/jQuery/
action here where the flickr images don't have a reflection and the other
image underneath does have a reflection.
I hope that explains my problem, if not let me know and I'll try again.
Thanks in advance for any help:-D
b0bd0gz
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/jquery.flickr-%2B-reflection-tf4204797s15494.html#a11960453
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
$('table') ... gets all tables
$('table').eq(1) ... gets the second table
$('#formelement').parent().parent().parent() ... gets the 'great-grandad' of
#formelement
or, to look back up the DOM for a table ...
var _find = $('#formelement');
while(!_find.is('table')){ _find = _find.parent(); }
...but I would recommend putting another test in this loop, just in case
#formelement doesn't have a table above it!
Mike Miller-13 wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the tip...the one other question I have related to this
that I need to move these rows in a table that has no id. The table
does have form elements that have id's and I could do something like
this in JS
document.getElementById(formelement).parentNode.parentNode.parentNode
- this gets a ref to the table
Likewise
document.getElementsByTagName(table) and then navigate to the
particular table element I am interested in.
Question now becomes...how do I do either one of those javascript
functions I am familiar with...with jquery/
M
On Jul 31, 2:57 am, Dave Probert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or for more detailed movement:
$('tr:eq(3)').insertBefore('tr:eq(1)');
or
$('tr:eq(2)').insertAfter('tr:eq(5)');
Note: the numbers are the row count - beginning at 0 (zero) for the
first row.
Lookup the jquery :xxx qualifiers for more options.
On Jul 31, 4:16 am, Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't been able to find any documentation so far that talks about
how to move rows around with jquery. Don't really need to sort the
whole table...rather I want to move one row to another position. Can
this be done?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Anything-similar-to-IE%27s-table.moveRow-in-jquery--tf4179383s15494.html#a11960409
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: What does === equate to?
I don't think many actually use !== (and when you would want to use it) and many sites that show usage of operators don't cover !== (but do have ===). 3 != '3' false 3 !== '3'true 3 == '3' true 3 === '3'false On Aug 1, 9:33 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I...cannot figure how what the heck === is. I see that Jake answered your question, but just for next time... You may have tried a Google search for javascript === and been disappointed to find it returned no useful results (because Google seems to ignore the === in the search). The key thing to know is that ===, like most special symbols in JavaScript such as + and -, is an operator. Now you can do a more productive Google search: http://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+operators This will help when you run into !== and wonder what the heck *that* one is. :-) -Mike
[jQuery] Re: where is thickbox reloaded ?
Hello Klaus, Maybe some of those geniuses in this list can wrap up a Massage plugin ? °-¨ Good recovery, take it easy! Alexandre -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klaus Hartl Sent: mercredi 1 août 2007 16:26 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: where is thickbox reloaded ? Alexandre Plennevaux wrote: is it me or has this promising plugin completely disappeared from this side of the jQniverse? No, it isn't you. It's me stopping to make any promises :-( The JavaScript code in SVN is ready for a first beta release, but I still didn't manage to clean up the CSS. As I have to stay on my couch the next days because I injured my back, maybe I can get that done. Hm, didn't I just say not to make any promises any longer? I should do it soon, I know! --Klaus Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.11.0/929 - Date: 31/07/2007 17:26
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
Beautiful! Must be showcased! That easing effect give it a nice slick
finishing touch !
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Resig
Sent: jeudi 2 août 2007 0:36
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
I still see a little bit of flicker in that new code that you posted - but I
was just able to pull together a demo that works quite nicely.
So here's a new, working, accordion (albeit, a very simple one):
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/plugins/accord/
compare with the old code:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/plugins/accord/old.html
Just a couple extra lines. There's three problems that had to be solved, two
were CSS, one was jQuery.
1) The headers had to have no margins. (When two margins are next to each
other, the margins collapse.
2) The bodies had to have no padding. (Unless, of course, you wanted to
animate the padding of the elements as well - but I find it easier to just
make the content inside the bodies have margins/padding).
3) When animating two properties, the numbers weren't being rounded properly
(e.g. body A would be 40.5px (rounded to 40px) and body B would be 20.5px
(rounded to 20px) - causing lots of weird jittering to occur.
There's a hidden 'step' function in the jQuery animate function (which, up
until this point, I had little use for, and was considering
removing) that you can use to get the current number of pixels processed for
an animation. So you just compute the remainder, and you get a smooth
result.
This technique *requires* that the bodies all have equal heights (and if
you'll notice, in both Rico and Apple.com, they require that as
well) so that it looks smooth.
Additionally, I threw in a fun easing effect to make things nice and
awesome. Let me know what you guys think!
--John
On 8/1/07, Justin Sepulveda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally. Someone else feels my pain. I had just posted a message to
this group today about this as well. I just wish there was an easier
way to remove that flicker/bounce that happens with the jQuery
standard slideUp/slideDown. Having to call in that many scripts to
get this effect seems pretty un-jQuery. But nice work!
On Aug 1, 11:18 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My company redesigns a web site. Our head designer (as apple fan)
decided to put nasty inverted hover accordion on new site. So,
yesterday I started to develop a
prototype:http://www.bydot.net/hoveracc/hoveracc_1.htm
Structure is:
ul
li
div class=omot
a class=naslov_stavkeNaslov stavke 1/a
div class=sadrzaj_stavkeSadrzaj stavke 1/div
/div
/li
li
div class=omot
a class=naslov_stavkeNaslov stavke 2/a
div class=sadrzaj_stavkeSadrzaj stavke 2/div
/div
/li
li
div class=omot a class=naslov_stavkeNaslov stavke 3/a
div class=sadrzaj_stavkeSadrzaj stavke 3/div
/div
/li
li
div class=omot a class=naslov_stavkeNaslov stavke 4/a
div class=sadrzaj_stavkeSadrzaj stavke 4/div
/div
/li
/ul
where naslov_stavke is part that should be hidden or shown, and
sadrzaj_stavke is always visible. Omot means wrap.
It took me about half an hour to make this piece, but, there's a
flicker that our designer didn't like.
Never mind if you can do it by jQuery. We will copy from apple.com.
Yeah, sure...
So, I spent next 6 hours yesterday and 4 today to find solution.
Actually, my idea was same all the time: to fixate elements by
position: absolute and top property. Here he the list of problems I
had to solve:
1) How to obtain consistency of li elements and children's. I did it
with div class=omot. In some time of development it was crucial
to have this div. Now, it isn't important, but it can help with styling.
2) On which container element to position:relative. The best
solution is to put on ul element that contains inverted accordion
3) How to remove position and top properties. There's no mention
about that in documentation
4) How to obtain proper top values for elements that should not move.
First, I wanted to do it just for elements that must remain static.
This will be done after each hover. Then, I decided to recalculate
top's for each div class=sadrzaj_stavke:
i = 0;
visine = new Array();
$(.sadrzaj_stavke).each(function(){visine[i]=$(this).position().to
p;i
++;});
which gives me wrong results all the time.
In one moment I have two perfectly working scripts, but one worked
in up direction, second one in down direction :) Finally, I decide
to put in work original idea to calculate top's, and that's working
perfectly (I abandoned this idea because I wanted to make more
flexible script)
Minor problems will be masked with images and css.
This solution can be generally used to solve jQuery animation quirks.
It can be found
[jQuery] Re: Collapsible Menu radio buttons problems in IE7
For some reason (and don't ask me why) IE does not like the checked attribute
being set in the html.
Add
$('#Menu input:radio').get(0).checked = true;
to your ready function, and set your radios to
input type=radio name=selection value=on /
input type=radio name=selection value=off /
(oh, and you should have li tags round the table!)
bucky483 wrote:
Hello all,
I just want to first say I'm pretty new to jQuery and so far love it.
Now with that said I have a problem when using Radio Buttons in a
Collapsible Menu. When you collapse the menu and re-open the section,
the Radio Button(s) that were selected disappear, that is in IE7.
Mozilla seems to work just fine, but I need this to work in IE7 as
well. Below is a very simple example that you can copy and paste to
see exactly what I'm trying to explain.
Thanks for the help,
Matt
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en
head
script type=text/javascript src=JQuery.js/script
script type=text/javascript
$(document).ready(function() {
$(#Menu li a).not(:first).find(+ ul).slideUp(1);
$(#Menu li a).click(function() {
$(this).find(+ ul).slideToggle(fast);});});
/script
style type=text/css
* {
margin : 0;
padding : 0;
}
body {
font : 80% verdana, sans-serif;
padding : 2em;
}
#Menu,
#Menu ul {
list-style : none;
width : 15em;
}
#Menu a {
background : #444c69 repeat-x center left;
border-top : 1px solid #5a648b;
color : #ff;
display : block;
padding : 0.7em 1em;
}
#Menu ul {
border-bottom : 1px solid #ddead2;
}
#Menu ul a {
border-color : #ddead2;
color : #55614c;
}
#Menu ul a:hover {
background : #bfddb3 repeat-x center left;
}
/style
/head
body
ul id=Menu
li # Section A
ul
table
tr
td
input type=radio name=selection value=on CHECKED
input type=radio name=selection value=off
/td
/tr
tr
td
input type=checkbox name=test value=1 CHECKED
input type=checkbox name=test1 value=0
td
/tr
/table
/ul
/li
/ul
/body
/html
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Collapsible-Menu-radio-buttons-problems-in-IE7-tf4203311s15494.html#a11960908
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
Klaus Hartl wrote:
$('#formelement').parents('table:eq(0)');
Even simpler.
NOTE: In documentation of parents(), first example is misleading/incorrect
in that shows the returned items in reverse order.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Anything-similar-to-IE%27s-table.moveRow-in-jquery--tf4179383s15494.html#a11961595
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
@All:
Ok. Here's a final solution for inverted hover accordion. hoverIntent plug
in is must. Structure is same as I posted earlier. Later during I will
upload it on web.
script
var radi1 = true;
var kd_opened;
var to_hide;
var height_op;
jQuery.easing.easeout = function(p, n, firstNum, delta, duration)
{
return -delta * ((n=n/duration-1)*n*n*n - 1) +
firstNum;
}
function otvoriSliku()
{
if(!$(this).siblings(.naslov_stavke).is(:visible) radi1 )
{
radi1 = false;
to_hide = $(this).siblings(.naslov_stavke);
to_hide.show().height(0);
kd_opened.animate({height:hide},
{step: function(n){
to_hide.height(Math.ceil(height_op-n));
if(n == 0){kd_opened = to_hide;radi1 =
true;}
},
duration: 500,
easing: easeout
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function()
{
kd_opened = $(.naslov_stavke:first);
height_op = kd_opened.height();
$(.naslov_stavke:not(:first)).hide();
$(.sadrzaj_stavke).hoverIntent({
sensitivity: 1,
interval: 50,
over: otvoriSliku,
out: function(){}
});
});
/script
Easing function is taken from Interface. Differences from John's script
are:
1) John calculate height of opened headers before each animation. This
script calculates only once, on the beginning, to save some CPU cycles
2) Before animation, height of hidden header must be set to 0. This is
because of differences in behavior of inverted and real accordion.
3) In John script, if you try to click on header during animation, script
becomes nasty. Putting whole animation script in If(radi1) and checking with
if(n == 0){kd_opened = to_hide;radi1 = true;} I prevented run of new
animation before old one is finished.
@John:
You are such inspiration! Thanks man! Or: Hvala ti puno za sve , on my
native (Serbian)
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
Some simple plugins that may help.
(function($) {
$.fn.moveRowAfter = function(index, afterIndex)
{
this.find(tr).eq(index).insertAfter(this.find(tr).eq(afterIndex));
return this;
};
$.fn.moveRowBefore = function(index, beforeIndex)
{
this.find(tr).eq(index).insertBefore(this.find(tr).eq(beforeIndex));
return this;
};
})(jQuery);
Usage:
// move first row after fourth row (won't do anything if there are
less than 4 rows in the table)
$(table tbody).moveRowAfter(0, 3);
On Jul 30, 10:16 pm, Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't been able to find any documentation so far that talks about
how to move rows around with jquery. Don't really need to sort the
whole table...rather I want to move one row to another position. Can
this be done?
[jQuery] Re: What does === equate to?
I had a discussion on the use of the === and !== operators recently on this list, my opinion was, and still is, that unless you explicitly WANT to allow type conversion, you should be using these. Only use == and != if you really want type conversion. It's bitten me once, although I can't for the life of me remember how, but it involved lots of in-depth debugging and head-scratching to find the problem. I'm more wary now and think that these operators are the way to go. --rob On 8/2/07, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think many actually use !== (and when you would want to use it) and many sites that show usage of operators don't cover !== (but do have ===). 3 != '3' false 3 !== '3'true 3 == '3' true 3 === '3'false On Aug 1, 9:33 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I...cannot figure how what the heck === is. I see that Jake answered your question, but just for next time... You may have tried a Google search for javascript === and been disappointed to find it returned no useful results (because Google seems to ignore the === in the search). The key thing to know is that ===, like most special symbols in JavaScript such as + and -, is an operator. Now you can do a more productive Google search: http://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+operators This will help when you run into !== and wonder what the heck *that* one is. :-) -Mike -- Rob Desbois Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01452 760631 Mob: 07946 705987 There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the whale was in full view. ...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.
[jQuery] Re: What does === equate to?
!== and === are identity operators. It is a good idea to use them instead of the equality operators (!= and ==) unless you know why you would want to use equality (and the possible type coercion) over identity. Probably the biggest gotcha with equality is with falsy values (false, 0, undefined, /empty string, null and NaN). The truthy / falsy issue is probably what bit you Rob. It may be worth reading a bit of Douglas Crockford's ideas about javascript if you are trying to figure out identity and equality operators: http://javascript.crockford.com/code.html And here is something about truthy and falsy: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/A_re-introduction_to_JavaScript#Other_types Ian On 8/2/07, Rob Desbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a discussion on the use of the === and !== operators recently on this list, my opinion was, and still is, that unless you explicitly WANT to allow type conversion, you should be using these. Only use == and != if you really want type conversion. It's bitten me once, although I can't for the life of me remember how, but it involved lots of in-depth debugging and head-scratching to find the problem. I'm more wary now and think that these operators are the way to go. --rob On 8/2/07, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think many actually use !== (and when you would want to use it) and many sites that show usage of operators don't cover !== (but do have ===). 3 != '3' false 3 !== '3'true 3 == '3' true 3 === '3'false On Aug 1, 9:33 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I...cannot figure how what the heck === is. I see that Jake answered your question, but just for next time... You may have tried a Google search for javascript === and been disappointed to find it returned no useful results (because Google seems to ignore the === in the search). The key thing to know is that ===, like most special symbols in JavaScript such as + and -, is an operator. Now you can do a more productive Google search: http://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+operators This will help when you run into !== and wonder what the heck *that* one is. :-) -Mike -- Rob Desbois Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01452 760631 Mob: 07946 705987 There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the whale was in full view. ...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.
[jQuery] Re: Dynamic Load Ajax of 2 jcarousel same page
Hi,
Joshp wrote:
I have searched and haven't quite come up with an answer. I'm trying to
load 2 separate carousels on the same page from different .txt file
sources. I'm not sure what I need to change. I tried putting two
separate Javascript jcarousel code on the same page and just changed the
jQuery.get(../slideshow.txt, function(data) and additionally changed the
jQuery(#mycarousel2).jcarousel. However only one source shows up in
both carousels.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
you need a callback function for each carousel since they load different
files. You can try that (untested):
function mycarousel_itemLoadCallback(url, carousel, state)
{
// Since we get all URLs in one file, we simply add all items
// at once and set the size accordingly.
if (state != 'init')
return;
jQuery.get(url, function(data) {
mycarousel_itemAddCallback(carousel, carousel.first, carousel.last,
data);
});
};
And then pass the following anonymous function as parameter:
jQuery('#mycarousel').jcarousel({
itemLoadCallback: function (carousel, state) {
mycarousel_itemLoadCallback('../slideshow1.txt', carousel, state); }
});
and for the second carousel:
jQuery('#mycarousel').jcarousel({
itemLoadCallback: function (carousel, state) {
mycarousel_itemLoadCallback('../slideshow2.txt', carousel, state); }
});
Jan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-Load-Ajax-of-2-jcarousel-same-page-tf4202780.html#a11961838
Sent from the jCarousel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
@John Why callback doesn't work with step function? Anyway, step function opens whole new field of synchronized animations. -- Dragan Krstić krdr http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] Re: Ajax Setup Questions
I test this code:
jQuery.ajaxSetup(
error: function(request, settings,ob){ alert( error: );}
}) ;
Then error message appear always that I do ajax athought ajax call is
success.
Am I doing something wrong or is a bug?
On 2 ago, 03:13, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the function is ajaxError() and not error()
-GTG
On 8/1/07, oscar esp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to have a global behaviour for ajax call. I have next code:
jQuery().ajaxSuccess(function(request, settings){updateCounter ();});
jQuery().error(function(request, settings){alert('APLICATION ERROR\n
'+settings.url);});
jQuery.ajaxTimeout(12);
- Ajax Success works fine.
- I don't know how provoke and error to execute error function Any
suggestion?
- TimeOut: When time out event is fired, error function should be
executed or there is any way to specify which function should be
fired?
Thanks.- Ocultar texto de la cita -
- Mostrar texto de la cita -
[jQuery] Re: How to get font size in pixels?
On Aug 1, 11:13 pm, Luke Lutman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've run into this before, and came up with pretty much the same
solution as Klaus:
http://jquery.lukelutman.com/plugins/px/jquery.px.js
which you can call like so:
$('#example').px('font-size');
One known bug is that it won't work for elements that don't accept
content, like img / or input /.
Cheers,
Luke
Another problem is that it wouldn't work if you use % for font size
(which is true in my case).
Getting the height may be a good option (although that also includes
padding).
[jQuery] Re: How to get font size in pixels?
Sam Collett wrote: Another problem is that it wouldn't work if you use % for font size (which is true in my case). Getting the height may be a good option (although that also includes padding). You simply need to use a reference element that doesn't have padding and borders. --Klaus
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
There is always room for improvement! Creating a nice set of demos has been discussed a few times but no one has actually stepped up to the plate to make it happen. Would you be willing to write a few demos? Would anyone else be willing to pitch in and help create a nice set of demos? We will also need a nice UI (*cough* Glen) to show off the demos. -- Brandon Aaron On 8/2/07, fatihturan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to a href=http://docs.mootools.net/;MooTools documentation/a and a href=http://demos.mootools.net/;demos/a then i'm looking to a href=http://docs.jquery.com/;jQuery's documentation/a (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation...
[jQuery] Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to a href=http://docs.mootools.net/;MooTools documentation/a and a href=http://demos.mootools.net/;demos/a then i'm looking to a href=http://docs.jquery.com/;jQuery's documentation/a (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation...
[jQuery] Re: 3D carousel?
Great work Franck! I see it with IE6 but it doesn't sho up on the page with FF1.5? Are you going to make it a plugin available on the jQuery site? Thanks Fred On 8/2/07, Franck Marcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I up this thread just to announce the brand new carousel of www.alapage.com, based on the work of Stefan Petre (http://interface.eyecon.ro). Many thanks to Stefan, many thanks to John. Franck. On 9 juil, 14:49, Michael Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fred Janon wrote: Has anyone done or know how to do a carousel like the 3D circular carousel in Flash inAmazon? It looks pretty cool. Forgive me if the link doesn't work for you but the carousel shows the best-seller books in a 3D circular carousel. http://www.amazon.com/ref=topnav_gw_/105-7722567-3277224 http://amazon.com/ref=topnav_gw_/105-7722567-3277224 Hi Fred, There's one in the Interface effects library as well: http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos You can see it demonstrated from the above link, near the bottom of the Technical Demos list. Regards, Michael Price
[jQuery] Problem with Interface droppable onhover
I have a problem with whis:
$('#drag').Draggable();
$('#holder .dropzone').Droppable({
accept :'dropaccept',
activeclass:'dropactive',
hoverclass: 'dropzonehover',
tolerance: 'pointer',
ondrop: function (drag) {
alert(this); //the
droppable
alert(drag); //the
draggable
},
onHover: function(drag) { alert(this);
//the droppable }
});
when I remove onhover line it works but if I add it it sops working,
and ideas?
it is driving me nuts...
[jQuery] Re: jquery.flickr + reflection
Thanks, you were right about the flickr images not being loaded yet. I added a setTimeout to delay when the addClass would be executed and it works, but only some of the time. Is there a way I can get it to execute only when the flickr images are loaded? Also theres another problem :( when the reflection is added to the flickr images they won't display inline, instead they display one on top of another. I've tried changing the CSS but whenever I get them displaying inline again the reflection disappears. Any ideas why it's doing this? http://b0bd0gz.adsl24.co.uk/jQuery/ heres the problem in action (you'll probably need to refresh it a few times to see the reflection) Thanks again for the help. b0bd0gz -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jquery.flickr-%2B-reflection-tf4204797s15494.html#a11963734 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
I think it is enough for start. jQuery is much easier to learn and examples on jQuery much more understandable and useful than mootools,dojo or prototype. But, jQuery have some undocumented features. For any advanced use, documentation is never enough, but jQuery api stands out. -- Dragan Krstić krdr http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] Re: Ajax Setup Questions
Oscar,
That should not be the case. Your error fn should only be invoked
when there is an error. Do you have a sample page we could look at?
In your code it looks like you have an extra curly brace and also the
arguments passed to the error fn should look like this:
jQuery.ajaxSetup(
error: function(xhr, status, err){ alert(error: +err);}
);
Mike
On 8/2/07, oscar esp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I test this code:
jQuery.ajaxSetup(
error: function(request, settings,ob){ alert( error: );}
}) ;
Then error message appear always that I do ajax athought ajax call is
success.
Am I doing something wrong or is a bug?
[jQuery] Re: Good Javascript editor or IDE?
I use Programmer's Notepad 2 (http://www.pnotepad.org/) and have even created some jQuery text clips (amongst others - http://www.texotela.co.uk/pn2/textclips/) for it. Although, as I am familiar with the jQuery API and have Visual Studio I don't use the clips much. It's not a full-blown IDE like Aptana or Visual Studio, but still a decent editor (as it does have a lot of features and loads quickly). On Aug 1, 7:00 pm, Matt Penner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just started developing with jQuery in the last month. I usually use VS 2005 or Notepad++ for my JavaScript. It's features are pretty much nil as far as intellisense goes. Mainly all they do is syntax highlighting and formatting. What recommendations on JavaScript editors or IDEs does anyone have? Is there something sophisticated enough that can have intellisense with jQuery or my own objects in external js files? Thanks, Matt
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
maybe you missed this: http://jquery.bassistance.de/api-browser/ Needs to be updated to 1.1.3 (might be worth holding on to the soon-to-be-released 1.1.4) On 8/2/07, fatihturan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to a href=http://docs.mootools.net/;MooTools documentation/a and a href=http://demos.mootools.net/;demos/a then i'm looking to a href=http://docs.jquery.com/;jQuery's documentation/a (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation... -- Tane Piper http://digitalspaghetti.tooum.net This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private
[jQuery] Re: How to get font size in pixels?
On Aug 1, 3:42 pm, george.gsgd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps think around the problem. Can you get the height of the element? That'd be in pixels regardless. Or maybe use sIFR instead? sIFR was used, but now a server-side method generates the image (i.e. so Flash isn't required and the amount the user has to download is less, plus the page is faster).
[jQuery] Re: Form Plugin and IE 7
I can't post a demo page, but using the firebug, he sad that I have an error in this line of my formplugin.js: var a = this.formToArray(options.semantic); The value of each element of this line is this: this = [ form#insereExame_salvarExame.php ] formToArray = function() options = Object url=corpo/exames/_salvarExame.php type=post semantic = undefined Can someone help-me? On 31 jul, 15:20, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most likely there is a script error occurring inIE. Can you post a demo page? Mike Hi, I have some problems withformplugin in theIE7. Theform, doesn't submit with ajax submit, theformsubmit like a normal form. In Firefox is all Ok.
[jQuery] Re: Form Plugin and IE 7
Danilow, This really isn't much to go on. Can you post more of your code? Or create a small page that demonstrates the problem? Mike On 8/2/07, danilow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't post a demo page, but using the firebug, he sad that I have an error in this line of my formplugin.js: var a = this.formToArray(options.semantic); The value of each element of this line is this: this = [ form#insereExame_salvarExame.php ] formToArray = function() options = Object url=corpo/exames/_salvarExame.php type=post semantic = undefined Can someone help-me? On 31 jul, 15:20, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most likely there is a script error occurring inIE. Can you post a demo page? Mike Hi, I have some problems withformplugin in theIE7. Theform, doesn't submit with ajax submit, theformsubmit like a normal form. In Firefox is all Ok.
[jQuery] Draw line or polygon like Google Map?
Hello, Did you played with Google Map? Google Map allow you to draw lines or polygon by providing points array. So wouldn't it be great if we have plugin using jQuery to do the same thing, but no need to related to map, just a general drawing library? howa
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
Have you actually tried to read mootools documentation? It's very technical IMHO. Jquery documentation 's layout may not be the sexiest, but it performs quite well in terms on how it is structured, written and how helpful and concise. Yes, in terms of docs too, less is sometimes more. I do wish it was more like php 's online docs, with (moderated) users feedback, tip and tricks for each function. Cheers, alex -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fatihturan Sent: jeudi 2 août 2007 10:18 To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to a href=http://docs.mootools.net/;MooTools documentation/a and a href=http://demos.mootools.net/;demos/a then i'm looking to a href=http://docs.jquery.com/;jQuery's documentation/a (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation... Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.11.0/929 - Date: 31/07/2007 17:26
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
I like http://www.visualjquery.com for my jquery documentation... yes there is lots of room for improvements but it's a working and living project which is constantly changing and I think the project managers are doing a great job to date... and demos? look at the plugin pages for demos... imho the core documentation should only be techinical with little to no examples... like the link above, they give a two liner example with before and after expectations that is more then a programmer deserves and is just icing on the cake... asking for demos of the core is like asking the creators for included libraries in any language (like c, c++, etc) to provide demos of the library functions when the coder only needs to know the name, input parameters and the expected output... ~Terry
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
2007/8/2, Alexandre Plennevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Have you actually tried to read mootools documentation? It's very technical IMHO. Yes, I did, but it cannot provide kick start as jQuery documentation. I have feeling mootool docs is oriented only to experienced users. Jquery documentation 's layout may not be the sexiest, but it performs quite well in terms on how it is structured, written and how helpful and concise. Yes, in terms of docs too, less is sometimes more. I do wish it was more like php 's online docs, with (moderated) users feedback, tip and tricks for each function. Me too. Even offline version is sufficient for great range of tasks. Cheers, alex -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fatihturan Sent: jeudi 2 août 2007 10:18 To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to a href=http://docs.mootools.net/;MooTools documentation/a and a href=http://demos.mootools.net/;demos/a then i'm looking to a href=http://docs.jquery.com/;jQuery's documentation/a (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation... Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.11.0/929 - Date: 31/07/2007 17:26 -- Dragan Krstić krdr http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] Re: What does === equate to?
known about this for awhile but since we are on the topic... there has to be some over head of using == and != does anyone know for sure the impact of the overhead... and does it matter of the type On Aug 2, 6:21 am, Ian Struble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !== and === are identity operators. It is a good idea to use them instead of the equality operators (!= and ==) unless you know why you would want to use equality (and the possible type coercion) over identity. Probably the biggest gotcha with equality is with falsy values (false, 0, undefined, /empty string, null and NaN). The truthy / falsy issue is probably what bit you Rob. It may be worth reading a bit of Douglas Crockford's ideas about javascript if you are trying to figure out identity and equality operators: http://javascript.crockford.com/code.html And here is something about truthy and falsy: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/A_re-introduction_to_JavaScript#... Ian On 8/2/07, Rob Desbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a discussion on the use of the === and !== operators recently on this list, my opinion was, and still is, that unless you explicitly WANT to allow type conversion, you should be using these. Only use == and != if you really want type conversion. It's bitten me once, although I can't for the life of me remember how, but it involved lots of in-depth debugging and head-scratching to find the problem. I'm more wary now and think that these operators are the way to go. --rob On 8/2/07, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think many actually use !== (and when you would want to use it) and many sites that show usage of operators don't cover !== (but do have ===). 3 != '3' false 3 !== '3'true 3 == '3' true 3 === '3'false On Aug 1, 9:33 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I...cannot figure how what the heck === is. I see that Jake answered your question, but just for next time... You may have tried a Google search for javascript === and been disappointed to find it returned no useful results (because Google seems to ignore the === in the search). The key thing to know is that ===, like most special symbols in JavaScript such as + and -, is an operator. Now you can do a more productive Google search: http://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+operators This will help when you run into !== and wonder what the heck *that* one is. :-) -Mike -- Rob Desbois Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01452 760631 Mob: 07946 705987 There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the whale was in full view. ...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.
[jQuery] Re: Check this, if you've got the time
I'd recommend booglyboogly since that's what happens when you click on the X -js On 8/2/07, Paul Caton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's neat! Now you need a good name for it. Come to think of it, it looks a bit like table tennis - maybe you could call it Ping-Pong, something like that. ;-)
[jQuery] Before automatically closes tags...?
I'm trying to enclose sections of the dom with a DIV tag. Basically I want all
elements between headings (and including the top-most heading) enclosed in a
DIV.
My approach is to scan through the DOM, find a header tag, insert an opening
DIV tag, continue scanning until I hit the next header, close the prior div,
and open a new div tag. Thus:
h2heading 2a\h2
...html tags...
h3heading 3a\h3
...html tags...
h2heading 2b\h2
...html tags...
Becomes (indent added for clarity only):
div
h2heading 2a\h2
...html tags...
\div
div
h3heading 3a\h3
...html tags...
/div
div
h2heading 2b\h2
...html tags...
/div
I'm using .before to add the starting div tag, but it looks like .before
automatically closes open tags. I don't see any mention of this in the docs.
How would I go about adding an open ended tag to the DOM?
Alternately, is there a way of identifying each section between headers so I
can .wrap with a div?
Here's the code snippet:
var open = false;
$('#text').children().each(function(i) {
if( this.nodeName.match(/^H\d+$/) ) {
if (open) {
$(this).before('/div');
}
$(this).before('div class=xxx');
open = true;
}
});
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
The thing I don't like about jQuery's docs are that there are lots of things left out. I suppose it's assumptions made, but common, important things aren't mentioned. _ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dragan Krstic Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:18 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? 2007/8/2, Alexandre Plennevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Have you actually tried to read mootools documentation? It's very technical IMHO. Yes, I did, but it cannot provide kick start as jQuery documentation. I have feeling mootool docs is oriented only to experienced users. Jquery documentation 's layout may not be the sexiest, but it performs quite well in terms on how it is structured, written and how helpful and concise. Yes, in terms of docs too, less is sometimes more. I do wish it was more like php 's online docs, with (moderated) users feedback, tip and tricks for each function. Me too. Even offline version is sufficient for great range of tasks. Cheers, alex -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of fatihturan Sent: jeudi 2 août 2007 10:18 To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to a href=http://docs.mootools.net/;MooTools documentation/a and a href= http://demos.mootools.net/;demos/a then i'm looking to a href=http://docs.jquery.com/;jQuery's documentation/a (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation... Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.11.0/929 - Date: 31/07/2007 17:26 -- Dragan Krstić krdr http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] Re: Check this, if you've got the time
That's neat! Now you need a good name for it. Come to think of it, it looks a bit like table tennis - maybe you could call it Ping-Pong, something like that. ;-)
[jQuery] Check this, if you've got the time
Hey, all - Just finished my first jQuery/AIR app, and it works... mostly. I haven't figured how to make my title draggable yet, and it's not the most impressive game, but it's working. If you'd like to offer feedback, it's up as an HTML file at: http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.html or as an AIR file (unverified) at http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.air Todo on it: make the window draggable by the title bar, make a more playable (game-worthy) interface, and start building a jQuery-based game engine!! Thanks! -Toby
[jQuery] Re: Check this, if you've got the time
Doesn't work at all in IE7 (probably 6 either). In FF2, there's a slight, but annoying, pause when you try to move the paddle. Other than those things, it's a cool proof of concept. Good to see some people jumping into using jQuery with AIR apps. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Parent Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:41 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Check this, if you've got the time Hey, all - Just finished my first jQuery/AIR app, and it works... mostly. I haven't figured how to make my title draggable yet, and it's not the most impressive game, but it's working. If you'd like to offer feedback, it's up as an HTML file at: http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.html or as an AIR file (unverified) at http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.air Todo on it: make the window draggable by the title bar, make a more playable (game-worthy) interface, and start building a jQuery-based game engine!! Thanks! -Toby
[jQuery] Adding 1px border to a TD
Hi, don't know if is a jquery related problem, but can you help me?
I've a table, like this:
table
tbody
tr class=record
td class=new
Test
/td
td class=old
Test
/td
/tr
/tbody
/table
Then in my js:
$(.new).hover( function() { $(this).addClass(hover) }, function() {
$(this).removeClass(hover) } );
my hover class is
.hover {
border-bottom:1px solid red;
}
I can see in firebug the class in the markup, but the border doesn't appear.
If I add in the markup the class hover I can see appear and disappear the
border.
I noticed the problem if my table as the css property border-collapse:collapse.
Thank you.
P.S.
Please can anyone answer to me, I have a big doubt: Can you read me?
Thank you
[jQuery] Re: Adding 1px border to a TD
Giovanni Battista Lenoci wrote:
Hi, don't know if is a jquery related problem, but can you help me?
I've a table, like this:
table
tbody
tr class=record
td class=new
Test
/td
td class=old
Test
/td
/tr
/tbody
/table
Then in my js:
$(.new).hover( function() { $(this).addClass(hover) }, function() {
$(this).removeClass(hover) } );
my hover class is
.hover {
border-bottom:1px solid red;
}
I can see in firebug the class in the markup, but the border doesn't appear.
If I add in the markup the class hover I can see appear and disappear the border.
I noticed the problem if my table as the css property border-collapse:collapse.
You already answered your question. The reason ist most probably the
border-collapse property.
A value of collapse for that property means that a border of two
adjacent cells collapses into one border, following certain rules
defined in the CSS spec, see border conflict resolution:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#border-conflict-resolution
Say you have a white background. One cell has a white border, the other
cell a black one. If the borders are to collapse it might happen that
the white one gets shown, so that it seems there is no border. But not
only colors affect that, if you declare hidden as border style for one
cell it may make collapsing borders disappear.
General information:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#collapsing-borders
Last not least, the whole issue isn't implemented consistently cross
browser of course.
HTH, Klaus
[jQuery] Drag and Drop links
Hi Folks I am trying drag and drop links from treeview plugin to a input box. or any link (no matter) When I try do this the input box receive the href. and title Ex: a title=Natural Gas Distribution href=/final/24360Natural Gas Distribution/a So in this case my input box will receive http://localhost/final/24360 Natural Gas Distribution Even if I change my link and remove href or just insert my text. a href=Natural Gas Distribution title=Natural Gas DistributionNatural Gas Distribution/a always will receive my base_path + href in the last case will receive something like http://localhost/final/Natural+Gas+Distribution Natural Gas Distribution Probably is a browser feature. I am not sure. Always two rows first href and second is title Is it possible or JQuery on the fly drag and Drop just the title? or the second line to input value box? Can I remove the first line while I am draging the element before drop? I tried Interface and easydrag and ui.js and ui.drag.js but didnt work. Ideas? My input is a simple text field (one line) so just paste the first line (Href) input type=text class=form-text value= id=item-text name=new_item / This feature is very simple but very useful for many web app. Regards Mario Moura
[jQuery] Re: What does === equate to?
There's no overhead unless the types are different. From the ECMAScript specification: For the 'abstract equality comparison algorithm' (==) [11.9.3] 1. if Type(x) is different from Type(y), go to step 14. For the 'strict equality comparison algorithm' (===) [11.9.3] 1. if Type(x) is different from Type(y), return false. Steps 2-13 of both algorithms are exactly the same, so if the types match then there's no difference in the execution of each algorithm, and no overhead for the abstract algorithm. --rob On 8/2/07, Terry B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: known about this for awhile but since we are on the topic... there has to be some over head of using == and != does anyone know for sure the impact of the overhead... and does it matter of the type On Aug 2, 6:21 am, Ian Struble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: !== and === are identity operators. It is a good idea to use them instead of the equality operators (!= and ==) unless you know why you would want to use equality (and the possible type coercion) over identity. Probably the biggest gotcha with equality is with falsy values (false, 0, undefined, /empty string, null and NaN). The truthy / falsy issue is probably what bit you Rob. It may be worth reading a bit of Douglas Crockford's ideas about javascript if you are trying to figure out identity and equality operators: http://javascript.crockford.com/code.html And here is something about truthy and falsy: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/A_re-introduction_to_JavaScript#. .. Ian On 8/2/07, Rob Desbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a discussion on the use of the === and !== operators recently on this list, my opinion was, and still is, that unless you explicitly WANT to allow type conversion, you should be using these. Only use == and != if you really want type conversion. It's bitten me once, although I can't for the life of me remember how, but it involved lots of in-depth debugging and head-scratching to find the problem. I'm more wary now and think that these operators are the way to go. --rob On 8/2/07, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think many actually use !== (and when you would want to use it) and many sites that show usage of operators don't cover !== (but do have ===). 3 != '3' false 3 !== '3'true 3 == '3' true 3 === '3'false On Aug 1, 9:33 pm, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I...cannot figure how what the heck === is. I see that Jake answered your question, but just for next time... You may have tried a Google search for javascript === and been disappointed to find it returned no useful results (because Google seems to ignore the === in the search). The key thing to know is that ===, like most special symbols in JavaScript such as + and -, is an operator. Now you can do a more productive Google search: http://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+operators This will help when you run into !== and wonder what the heck *that* one is. :-) -Mike -- Rob Desbois Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01452 760631 Mob: 07946 705987 There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the whale was in full view. ...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome. -- Rob Desbois Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01452 760631 Mob: 07946 705987 There's a whale there's a whale there's a whale fish he cried, and the whale was in full view. ...Then ooh welcome. Ahhh. Ooh mug welcome.
[jQuery] Re: Before automatically closes tags...?
There is a plugin called nextUntil that you may be able to use. An
example is available at http://dev.jquery.com/~john/jquery/test/nextuntil.html
Although I'm surprised it isn't in SVN or on the plugins page (perhaps
there are bugs?).
On Aug 2, 3:48 pm, DaveG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to enclose sections of the dom with a DIV tag. Basically I want
all elements between headings (and including the top-most heading) enclosed
in a DIV.
My approach is to scan through the DOM, find a header tag, insert an opening
DIV tag, continue scanning until I hit the next header, close the prior div,
and open a new div tag. Thus:
h2heading 2a\h2
...html tags...
h3heading 3a\h3
...html tags...
h2heading 2b\h2
...html tags...
Becomes (indent added for clarity only):
div
h2heading 2a\h2
...html tags...
\div
div
h3heading 3a\h3
...html tags...
/div
div
h2heading 2b\h2
...html tags...
/div
I'm using .before to add the starting div tag, but it looks like .before
automatically closes open tags. I don't see any mention of this in the docs.
How would I go about adding an open ended tag to the DOM?
Alternately, is there a way of identifying each section between headers so I
can .wrap with a div?
Here's the code snippet:
var open = false;
$('#text').children().each(function(i) {
if( this.nodeName.match(/^H\d+$/) ) {
if (open) {
$(this).before('/div');
}
$(this).before('div class=xxx');
open = true;
}
});
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
Brandon Aaron wrote: On 8/2/07, *fatihturan* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. There is always room for improvement! Creating a nice set of demos has been discussed a few times but no one has actually stepped up to the plate to make it happen. Would you be willing to write a few demos? Would anyone else be willing to pitch in and help create a nice set of demos? We will also need a nice UI (*cough* Glen) to show off the demos. Ever since a thread [1] several months ago discussing the Mootools demos [2] I've been thinking on and off about how JQuery could demo what it's all about. In the past two weeks, I've been thinking about it more seriously and have some real ideas I'd like to test out. But Sunday I leave for a two-week vacation and I will have no time before then to try any of this. If there has been no progress on this before I return, I will try to start implementing these ideas. If I get anywhere, I will share it early with the group. And I will absolutely need some design help. (Did someone mention Glen? : ) -- Scott [1] http://tinyurl.com/2lamfw [2] http://demos.mootools.net/
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
don't forget it's a wiki, so we can actually update it ourselves. What is it that you found not well documented ? _ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Matthews Sent: jeudi 2 août 2007 15:50 To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? The thing I don't like about jQuery's docs are that there are lots of things left out. I suppose it's assumptions made, but common, important things aren't mentioned. _ From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dragan Krstic Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:18 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? 2007/8/2, Alexandre Plennevaux HYPERLINK mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]: Have you actually tried to read mootools documentation? It's very technical IMHO. Yes, I did, but it cannot provide kick start as jQuery documentation. I have feeling mootool docs is oriented only to experienced users. Jquery documentation 's layout may not be the sexiest, but it performs quite well in terms on how it is structured, written and how helpful and concise. Yes, in terms of docs too, less is sometimes more. I do wish it was more like php 's online docs, with (moderated) users feedback, tip and tricks for each function. Me too. Even offline version is sufficient for great range of tasks. Cheers, alex -Original Message- From: HYPERLINK mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.comjquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:HYPERLINK mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.comjquery-en@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of fatihturan Sent: jeudi 2 août 2007 10:18 To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? What do you think about this question? Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? Personally i think jQuery's documentation isn't enought. So i'm looking to a href=HYPERLINK http://docs.mootools.net/http://docs.mootools.net/;MooTools documentation/a and a href= HYPERLINK http://demos.mootools.net/http://demos.mootools.net/;demos/a then i'm looking to a href=HYPERLINK http://docs.jquery.com/http://docs.jquery.com/;jQuery's documentation/a (dude where is demos? xD) comparing both documentations and thinking jQuery's documentation isn't enought. However, i want to know what do you think about this situation... Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.11.0/929 - Date: 31/07/2007 17:26 -- Dragan Krstić krdr HYPERLINK http://krdr.ebloggy.com/http://krdr.ebloggy.com/ Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. Analyse effectuée par AVG. Version: 7.5.476 / Base de données virus: 269.11.0/929 - Date: 31/07/2007 17:26
[jQuery] Safari: Elements within overlaying Div not recognised
Hi, Im currently working on a web app which has a feature where a user can click a button which brings up an image gallery in the form of a div which overlays the page until the user selects an image, at which point the gallery is hidden again. This has so far worked perfectly in Firefox and IE but today I began testing with safari and I'm running into the following issue. The Div is displayed as normal when the gallery button is selected but once the div is visible, none of the images within the div are clickable as normal and even the close button isnt enabled. its as if the normal click events which are attached on IE and Ff just dont kick in and makes this part of the site useless. This issue only seems to occur on the safari browser, running on Max OS X. Any ideas on this one? Cheers, Chris
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
The documentation is excellent and one major reason I am here. As a publisher and writer of computer books, I think I know exactly what the best next step would be for improving the docs. Before I sold Waite Group Press to Simon and Schuster we had two very successful lines of language books Bibles (ergo reference guides) How To's (e.g. How Do I..Call a Javascript Function from jQuery) We let IDG (now Wiley) and others do the dummies books because that area of the market was a gold mine if you hit it first. I am hoping we will see a Head First jQuery from O'Rielly and a jQuery Visual QuickStart from Peachpit. We know Karl has a reference book coming out from Packit (you should all preorder it to support our local authors) WHAT IS NEEDED FOR A JQUERY LEARNING RESOURCE I think jQuery could benefit greatly from a simple How To document/book/website addition/etc. If we followed my model the pages would be a collection of How Do I...(do something in jQ) in a standard format. It would need a super table of contents and be set up for searching concepts. The key is picking a range of really really good How To's. If any of you have our old Visual Basic How To that sucker really sold well because we worked very hard picking good examples. I've been thinking about what these might be and have a lot of other ideas. In our books we would start with the most basic uses of jQuery and move up in difficulty and level towards later chapters. We would aim to have How Tos that actually did things that are useful but we would try and keep them short as possible. I have started a How To list because as a novice I am very aware of the simple assumptions the docs make and the very important things you need to know early about syntax and basic concepts. If anyone is interested in working with me on such a project, let me know offline and I will report back here if I spark any interest. Mitch -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry B Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:18 AM To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? I like http://www.visualjquery.com for my jquery documentation... yes there is lots of room for improvements but it's a working and living project which is constantly changing and I think the project managers are doing a great job to date... and demos? look at the plugin pages for demos... imho the core documentation should only be techinical with little to no examples... like the link above, they give a two liner example with before and after expectations that is more then a programmer deserves and is just icing on the cake... asking for demos of the core is like asking the creators for included libraries in any language (like c, c++, etc) to provide demos of the library functions when the coder only needs to know the name, input parameters and the expected output... ~Terry
[jQuery] Re: Check this, if you've got the time
Whats the big deal about AIR? I went to the labs to study it and its so overwhelming (does anything) that I kind of missed the whole point. From what I gathered its like an entire operating system. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Parent Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:41 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Check this, if you've got the time Hey, all - Just finished my first jQuery/AIR app, and it works... mostly. I haven't figured how to make my title draggable yet, and it's not the most impressive game, but it's working. If you'd like to offer feedback, it's up as an HTML file at: http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.html or as an AIR file (unverified) at http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.air Todo on it: make the window draggable by the title bar, make a more playable (game-worthy) interface, and start building a jQuery-based game engine!! Thanks! -Toby
[jQuery] Re: jquery.flickr + reflection
Other than this issue with Flickr how do you like the Reflection plug in? it looks neat to me. I don't like that the reflection moves everything below it down. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of b0bd0gz Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:41 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery.flickr + reflection Thanks, you were right about the flickr images not being loaded yet. I added a setTimeout to delay when the addClass would be executed and it works, but only some of the time. Is there a way I can get it to execute only when the flickr images are loaded? Also theres another problem :( when the reflection is added to the flickr images they won't display inline, instead they display one on top of another. I've tried changing the CSS but whenever I get them displaying inline again the reflection disappears. Any ideas why it's doing this? http://b0bd0gz.adsl24.co.uk/jQuery/ heres the problem in action (you'll probably need to refresh it a few times to see the reflection) Thanks again for the help. b0bd0gz -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jquery.flickr-%2B-reflection-tf4204797s15494.html#a119 63734 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: jquery.flickr + reflection
I think its great, really easy to use even for a beginner like me :-D and looks brilliant. Just need to find out how to stop it moving everything below it and it'll be perfect=) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jquery.flickr-%2B-reflection-tf4204797s15494.html#a11967446 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
@John Thanks for jumping on this as I'm sure you have many more things to worry about in the jQuery world. It's very much appreciated. @Karl Kick-assity. I just had to note how awesome this word is. Nice work :-) On Aug 2, 4:01 am, Dragan Krstic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @John Why callback doesn't work with step function? Anyway, step function opens whole new field of synchronized animations. -- Dragan Krstić krdrhttp://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
@John One more thing. I'm getting a serious amount of JavaScript errors, the same error repeated over and over. It seems to happen when i click on a tab while another tab is open. jquery.js (line 321) too much recursion [Break on this error] fn.constructor != Array /function/i.test( fn + ); On Aug 2, 4:01 am, Dragan Krstic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @John Why callback doesn't work with step function? Anyway, step function opens whole new field of synchronized animations. -- Dragan Krstić krdrhttp://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] Re: What does === equate to?
That's an interesting find, Rob, thanks. But watch out. We're looking at the ECMAScript standard, not running code. An actual implementation could have different performance for the two operators and still conform to the spec. It does seem unlikely that anyone would code == to be slower than === , but as Knuth said, I have only proven it correct, not tested it. :-) -Mike _ From: Rob Desbois There's no overhead unless the types are different. From the ECMAScript specification: For the 'abstract equality comparison algorithm' (==) [11.9.3] 1. if Type(x) is different from Type(y), go to step 14. For the 'strict equality comparison algorithm' (===) [11.9.3] 1. if Type(x) is different from Type(y), return false. Steps 2-13 of both algorithms are exactly the same, so if the types match then there's no difference in the execution of each algorithm, and no overhead for the abstract algorithm. --rob On 8/2/07, Terry B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: known about this for awhile but since we are on the topic... there has to be some over head of using == and != does anyone know for sure the impact of the overhead... and does it matter of the type
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
@John One more thing. I'm getting a serious amount of JavaScript errors, the same error repeated over and over. It seems to happen when i click on a tab while another tab is open. jquery.js (line 321) too much recursion [Break on this error] fn.constructor != Array /function/i.test( fn + ); It happens when you click on header during animations. Take a look on 3) in my previous post. Browser cannot handle so many recursions
[jQuery] Re: jquery.flickr + reflection
You have to leave room for the reflection image, but I wonder if there is a way to put that image in the background of a DIV so you could write over it with HTML. My guess now is that it's using display: none instead of hide and show. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of b0bd0gz Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:06 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: jquery.flickr + reflection I think its great, really easy to use even for a beginner like me :-D and looks brilliant. Just need to find out how to stop it moving everything below it and it'll be perfect=) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/jquery.flickr-%2B-reflection-tf4204797s15494.html#a119 67446 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: disable Effect queue
I think the .animate() function will help you to combine effects
ie.
$(element).animate({height:'toggle',opacity:'toggle'})
This should slide and fade an element at the same time.
ravenel wrote:
Hello,
I am using effects (e.g. fadeIn Out, slideUp Down etc.) on a div
triggered with a mouseover and mouseout event on a trigger-div.
When the user starts entering and leaving the trigger-div with the
mouse, jquery queues all effects and displays them one after another.
I don't want jQuery to queue the effects. When the user leaves the
toggle-div before the onmousover-effect has finished it just should
override it an start with the onmouseout effect.
How can I achive this?
Thank you in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/disable-Effect-queue-tf4169331s15494.html#a11967644
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: slideUp/Down flicker with 1.0.4
Anyone ? naz.. nazeem wrote: Can someone help me solve this flicker issue when navigating this menu...on LHS I am using simple slideup and slidedown.. attached the zip file... http://www.nabble.com/file/p11938864/jquery-seap.zip jquery-seap.zip - nazeem Brian Litzinger wrote: I noticed it Firefox, but surprisingly it doesn't happen for me in Safari. I'm injecting html into a div then sliding it down, and I assumed I might not have written the code correctly, but I also noticed it on normal elements as well. Brian Mika Tuupola wrote: Upon upgrading to jQuery 1.0.4 some of my slideUp/Down elements started to flicker. With 1.0.3 this problem did not exist. http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/jquery/slideupdown/slideupdown5.html http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/jquery/slideupdown/slideupdown6.html (Click the blue box in the corner). Am I missing something obvious or is this just css problem? -- Mika Tuupola http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/ ___ jQuery mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jquery.com/discuss/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/slideUp-Down-flicker-with-1.0.4-tf2919581s15494.html#a11968093 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: Safari: Elements within overlaying Div not recognised
Hmmm, sounds like a z-index issue. Try setting z-index value of the div that contains the images and close button to a fairly highly value and see if that enables you to interact with them images. Hth, -scott -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 11:33 AM To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Safari: Elements within overlaying Div not recognised Hi, Im currently working on a web app which has a feature where a user can click a button which brings up an image gallery in the form of a div which overlays the page until the user selects an image, at which point the gallery is hidden again. This has so far worked perfectly in Firefox and IE but today I began testing with safari and I'm running into the following issue. The Div is displayed as normal when the gallery button is selected but once the div is visible, none of the images within the div are clickable as normal and even the close button isnt enabled. its as if the normal click events which are attached on IE and Ff just dont kick in and makes this part of the site useless. This issue only seems to occur on the safari browser, running on Max OS X. Any ideas on this one? Cheers, Chris
[jQuery] How to add or delete branches in Treeview ?
Dear Please guide me how to add or delete branches/folders/childs in treeview during run time ? I shall be very much obliged for this guideline. Thanks.
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
Sam...what plugins are you refering to with the moveRowAfter?
M
On Aug 2, 2:24 am, Wizzud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$('table') ... gets all tables
$('table').eq(1) ... gets the second table
$('#formelement').parent().parent().parent() ... gets the 'great-grandad' of
#formelement
or, to look back up the DOM for a table ...
var _find = $('#formelement');
while(!_find.is('table')){ _find = _find.parent(); }
...but I would recommend putting another test in this loop, just in case
#formelement doesn't have a table above it!
Mike Miller-13 wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the tip...the one other question I have related to this
that I need to move these rows in a table that has no id. The table
does have form elements that have id's and I could do something like
this in JS
document.getElementById(formelement).parentNode.parentNode.parentNode
- this gets a ref to the table
Likewise
document.getElementsByTagName(table) and then navigate to the
particular table element I am interested in.
Question now becomes...how do I do either one of those javascript
functions I am familiar with...with jquery/
M
On Jul 31, 2:57 am, Dave Probert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or for more detailed movement:
$('tr:eq(3)').insertBefore('tr:eq(1)');
or
$('tr:eq(2)').insertAfter('tr:eq(5)');
Note: the numbers are the row count - beginning at 0 (zero) for the
first row.
Lookup the jquery :xxx qualifiers for more options.
On Jul 31, 4:16 am, Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't been able to find any documentation so far that talks about
how to move rows around with jquery. Don't really need to sort the
whole table...rather I want to move one row to another position. Can
this be done?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
View this message in
context:http://www.nabble.com/Anything-similar-to-IE%27s-table.moveRow-in-jqu...
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
Last version of inverted accordion on: http://www.bydot.net/hoveracc/hoveracc_3.htm Enjoy... 2007/8/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: @John One more thing. I'm getting a serious amount of JavaScript errors, the same error repeated over and over. It seems to happen when i click on a tab while another tab is open. jquery.js (line 321) too much recursion [Break on this error] fn.constructor != Array /function/i.test( fn + ); It happens when you click on header during animations. Take a look on 3) in my previous post. Browser cannot handle so many recursions -- Dragan Krstić krdr http://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] blockUI question
I am using blockUI like modal window, it means that I load html page in the blockUI message. That works fine, however I have a problem now, because I need to block (when I am in the modal) to show confirm message... Are there any way to block twice?
[jQuery] Re: Check this, if you've got the time
AIR is basically WebKit (the engine behind Safari), more tightly integrated into the system. Basically, an easier-to-code version of Konfabulator. It allows developers to develop web applications that run on the desktop, have behaviors that operate a certain way when you're offline, and have a set course of action when your status returns to online. I do use some AIR gadgets now, and I'm writing a few more, just for fun and practice (to say I'm an AIR developer, basically) - I'm a fan of the Adobe Kuler (http://kuler.adobe.com) application, which returns a set of palettes that users have created. Mitchell Waite wrote: Whats the big deal about AIR? I went to the labs to study it and its so overwhelming (does anything) that I kind of missed the whole point. From what I gathered its like an entire operating system. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Parent Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:41 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Check this, if you've got the time Hey, all - Just finished my first jQuery/AIR app, and it works... mostly. I haven't figured how to make my title draggable yet, and it's not the most impressive game, but it's working. If you'd like to offer feedback, it's up as an HTML file at: http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.html or as an AIR file (unverified) at http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.air Todo on it: make the window draggable by the title bar, make a more playable (game-worthy) interface, and start building a jQuery-based game engine!! Thanks! -Toby
[jQuery] Re: disable Effect queue
Use 'hover()'.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of seedy
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:17 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: disable Effect queue
I think the .animate() function will help you to combine effects
ie.
$(element).animate({height:'toggle',opacity:'toggle'})
This should slide and fade an element at the same time.
ravenel wrote:
Hello,
I am using effects (e.g. fadeIn Out, slideUp Down etc.) on a div
triggered with a mouseover and mouseout event on a trigger-div.
When the user starts entering and leaving the trigger-div with the
mouse, jquery queues all effects and displays them one after another.
I don't want jQuery to queue the effects. When the user leaves the
toggle-div before the onmousover-effect has finished it just should
override it an start with the onmouseout effect.
How can I achive this?
Thank you in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/disable-Effect-queue-tf4169331s15494.html#a11967644
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[jQuery] Re: If user clicks in one place OR another place OR another place...
Another question I have is how would you combine a keyup event like
this:
$( [EMAIL PROTECTED]'history'].click || [EMAIL PROTECTED] .keyup )
(function() {
});
[jQuery] Re: Check this, if you've got the time
Mitchell, Check out my blog post about AIR. It's **WAY** more than just WebKit (though it does indeed incorproate the WebKit HTML engine). http://cjordan.us/index.cfm/2007/7/19/Adobe-on-AIR-Bus-Tour-Summer-2007 In short, AIR is the Adobe Integrated Runtime. It allows you to use HTML, JavaScript, ActionScript3, Flex, FlexBuilder3, Flash or any combination of the above to create connected desktop applications (sorta like the JVM gives Java developers the ability to write programs for the desktop). See my blog post for more detail. Cheers, Chris On 8/2/07, Mitchell Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats the big deal about AIR? I went to the labs to study it and its so overwhelming (does anything) that I kind of missed the whole point. From what I gathered its like an entire operating system. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Parent Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:41 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Check this, if you've got the time Hey, all - Just finished my first jQuery/AIR app, and it works... mostly. I haven't figured how to make my title draggable yet, and it's not the most impressive game, but it's working. If you'd like to offer feedback, it's up as an HTML file at: http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.html or as an AIR file (unverified) at http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.air Todo on it: make the window draggable by the title bar, make a more playable (game-worthy) interface, and start building a jQuery-based game engine!! Thanks! -Toby -- http://cjordan.us
[jQuery] Re: If user clicks in one place OR another place OR another place...
$([EMAIL PROTECTED]'history'] OR '[EMAIL PROTECTED]').click(function() Like so: $([EMAIL PROTECTED]'history'], [EMAIL PROTECTED]').click(function() ...) --John
[jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
it looks great nicolas. but i would sincerely recommend one demo per page. It is too straining on the eyes, but i see ur point. There goes the power of jquery... it is just 1.7 K packed. Good work... -GTG On 8/2/07, Nicolas Hoizey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a great-looking demo--thanks for the link! Hopefully a jQuery addin will be developed for that. I tried, and got something quite nice using only jQuery's animate(): http://www.gasteroprod.com/data/jquery/jKenBurnsEffect/ There are 4 running demos on the same page, but it seems to run smooth enough on my Mac + Firefox. Please tel me if it is interesting, or should be done another way. -Nicolas On Jul 26, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Nicolas Hoizey wrote: Hello, Has anyone already made a Ken Burns effects slideshow powered by jQuery? I've found this one very nice, but made with Mootools, and I would not like having all JS libraries on my website... ;-) http://www.electricprism.com/aeron/slideshow/ I don't need much, only a slideshow of photos moving and zooming in/ out randomly inside a div. Thanks! -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002 -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002
[jQuery] Re: Draw line or polygon like Google Map?
good idea? I am trying to think of use-cases for it... do u have any real world use case for it off-hand other than maps. -GTG On 8/2/07, howa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Did you played with Google Map? Google Map allow you to draw lines or polygon by providing points array. So wouldn't it be great if we have plugin using jQuery to do the same thing, but no need to related to map, just a general drawing library? howa
[jQuery] Re: Check this, if you've got the time
My question is, when are they doing to release a linux version of the dev kit and runtime? Its looks very interesting but I have yet been able to try it out :( On 02/08/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mitchell, Check out my blog post about AIR. It's **WAY** more than just WebKit (though it does indeed incorproate the WebKit HTML engine). http://cjordan.us/index.cfm/2007/7/19/Adobe-on-AIR-Bus-Tour-Summer-2007 In short, AIR is the Adobe Integrated Runtime. It allows you to use HTML, JavaScript, ActionScript3, Flex, FlexBuilder3, Flash or any combination of the above to create connected desktop applications (sorta like the JVM gives Java developers the ability to write programs for the desktop). See my blog post for more detail. Cheers, Chris On 8/2/07, Mitchell Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats the big deal about AIR? I went to the labs to study it and its so overwhelming (does anything) that I kind of missed the whole point. From what I gathered its like an entire operating system. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tobias Parent Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:41 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Check this, if you've got the time Hey, all - Just finished my first jQuery/AIR app, and it works... mostly. I haven't figured how to make my title draggable yet, and it's not the most impressive game, but it's working. If you'd like to offer feedback, it's up as an HTML file at: http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.html or as an AIR file (unverified) at http://tobias.parentleafarm.com/rebound.air Todo on it: make the window draggable by the title bar, make a more playable (game-worthy) interface, and start building a jQuery-based game engine!! Thanks! -Toby -- http://cjordan.us -- Tane Piper http://digitalspaghetti.tooum.net This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private
[jQuery] Re: Before automatically closes tags...?
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:55:20 -, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a plugin called nextUntil that you may be able to use. An example is available at http://dev.jquery.com/~john/jquery/test/nextuntil.html I hadn't seen that before. It's close, but not quite what I'm looking for, as I need to be able to specify a list of next elements: nextUnitl (h1,h2,h3...). I think amending the function to do that would be considerable work. What I'd really like is a way to insert dom elements without automatic closure taking place. I checked out jQ and didn't see a flag in the code; although to be honest I'm not sure I fully understood what's going on in there ;) ~ ~ Dave
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
Ok...so this is working somewhat...the issue I see now is that the
find() in the plugins are finding the wrong row.
My table structure looks like this:
table
- row1
- cell 1
-table
row 2
-cell 1
-table
row3
-cell 1
-table
When we use the parents(table eq:(0)) I get a reference to the main
table containing all of the nested tables...however when using the
find...it is finding rows within the nested table.
Is there a way to make the find pertain only to the parent?
Mike
On Aug 2, 10:44 am, Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam...what plugins are you refering to with the moveRowAfter?
M
On Aug 2, 2:24 am, Wizzud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$('table') ... gets all tables
$('table').eq(1) ... gets the second table
$('#formelement').parent().parent().parent() ... gets the 'great-grandad' of
#formelement
or, to look back up the DOM for a table ...
var _find = $('#formelement');
while(!_find.is('table')){ _find = _find.parent(); }
...but I would recommend putting another test in this loop, just in case
#formelement doesn't have a table above it!
Mike Miller-13 wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the tip...the one other question I have related to this
that I need to move these rows in a table that has no id. The table
does have form elements that have id's and I could do something like
this in JS
document.getElementById(formelement).parentNode.parentNode.parentNode
- this gets a ref to the table
Likewise
document.getElementsByTagName(table) and then navigate to the
particular table element I am interested in.
Question now becomes...how do I do either one of those javascript
functions I am familiar with...with jquery/
M
On Jul 31, 2:57 am, Dave Probert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or for more detailed movement:
$('tr:eq(3)').insertBefore('tr:eq(1)');
or
$('tr:eq(2)').insertAfter('tr:eq(5)');
Note: the numbers are the row count - beginning at 0 (zero) for the
first row.
Lookup the jquery :xxx qualifiers for more options.
On Jul 31, 4:16 am, Mike Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't been able to find any documentation so far that talks about
how to move rows around with jquery. Don't really need to sort the
whole table...rather I want to move one row to another position. Can
this be done?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--
View this message in
context:http://www.nabble.com/Anything-similar-to-IE%27s-table.moveRow-in-jqu...
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[jQuery] Re: 3D carousel?
Are you going to make it a plugin available on the jQuery site? I thought it was an implementation of the interface 3d carousel on his site. correct me if i am wrong? -GTG On 8/1/07, Fred Janon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great work Franck! I see it with IE6 but it doesn't sho up on the page with FF1.5? Are you going to make it a plugin available on the jQuery site? Thanks Fred On 8/2/07, Franck Marcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I up this thread just to announce the brand new carousel of www.alapage.com, based on the work of Stefan Petre (http://interface.eyecon.ro). Many thanks to Stefan, many thanks to John. Franck. On 9 juil, 14:49, Michael Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fred Janon wrote: Has anyone done or know how to do a carousel like the 3D circular carousel in Flash inAmazon? It looks pretty cool. Forgive me if the link doesn't work for you but the carousel shows the best-seller books in a 3D circular carousel. http://www.amazon.com/ref=topnav_gw_/105-7722567-3277224 http://amazon.com/ref=topnav_gw_/105-7722567-3277224 Hi Fred, There's one in the Interface effects library as well: http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos You can see it demonstrated from the above link, near the bottom of the Technical Demos list. Regards, Michael Price
[jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
Very nice in FF but no go in IE7. Too fast - slow down the effects speed so we can really see them. Is this plug in ready for prime time? -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas Hoizey Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:40 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery? That's a great-looking demo--thanks for the link! Hopefully a jQuery addin will be developed for that. I tried, and got something quite nice using only jQuery's animate(): http://www.gasteroprod.com/data/jquery/jKenBurnsEffect/ There are 4 running demos on the same page, but it seems to run smooth enough on my Mac + Firefox. Please tel me if it is interesting, or should be done another way. -Nicolas On Jul 26, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Nicolas Hoizey wrote: Hello, Has anyone already made a Ken Burns effects slideshow powered by jQuery? I've found this one very nice, but made with Mootools, and I would not like having all JS libraries on my website... ;-) http://www.electricprism.com/aeron/slideshow/ I don't need much, only a slideshow of photos moving and zooming in/ out randomly inside a div. Thanks! -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002 -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002
[jQuery] Re: Before automatically closes tags...?
On Aug 2, 7:46 pm, DaveG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'd really like is a way to insert dom elements without automatic closure taking place. I checked out jQ and didn't see a flag in the code; although to be honest I'm not sure I fully understood what's going on in there ;) The automatic closure is happening due to HOW the functions like after() and before() are implemented. When you pass HTML to them, they use the browser-supplied DOM functions to create a miniature DOM tree. Your BROWSER is what creates the tree and gives jQuery back a well- formed DOM tree, which jQuery can than append/prepend/whatever to your existing DOM tree. This is, in fact, the only sane way to implement the behaviour, as implementing a full-fledged HTML parser into jQ would increase its size by several times.
[jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
Doesn't work at all on IE. -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mitchell Waite Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 1:05 PM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery? Very nice in FF but no go in IE7. Too fast - slow down the effects speed so we can really see them. Is this plug in ready for prime time? -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nicolas Hoizey Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:40 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery? That's a great-looking demo--thanks for the link! Hopefully a jQuery addin will be developed for that. I tried, and got something quite nice using only jQuery's animate(): http://www.gasteroprod.com/data/jquery/jKenBurnsEffect/ There are 4 running demos on the same page, but it seems to run smooth enough on my Mac + Firefox. Please tel me if it is interesting, or should be done another way. -Nicolas On Jul 26, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Nicolas Hoizey wrote: Hello, Has anyone already made a Ken Burns effects slideshow powered by jQuery? I've found this one very nice, but made with Mootools, and I would not like having all JS libraries on my website... ;-) http://www.electricprism.com/aeron/slideshow/ I don't need much, only a slideshow of photos moving and zooming in/ out randomly inside a div. Thanks! -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002 -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002
[jQuery] Re: blockUI question
How about using a window.confirm dialog? :-) I put together an example of how this can be done with blockUI: http://malsup.com/jquery/block/nest.html Mike On 8/2/07, oscar esp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using blockUI like modal window, it means that I load html page in the blockUI message. That works fine, however I have a problem now, because I need to block (when I am in the modal) to show confirm message... Are there any way to block twice?
[jQuery] Re: Before automatically closes tags...?
I just made a quick tweak to .nextUntil() so that it can take a
comma-separated list of items. I updated the demo to reflect this as
well, for example:
$(h2).each(function(){
$(this).nextUntil(h1, h2).wrapAll(div class='note'/div);
});
--John
On 8/2/07, DaveG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:55:20 -, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a plugin called nextUntil that you may be able to use. An
example is available at
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/jquery/test/nextuntil.html
I hadn't seen that before. It's close, but not quite what I'm looking for, as
I need to be able to specify a list of next elements: nextUnitl
(h1,h2,h3...). I think amending the function to do that would be considerable
work.
What I'd really like is a way to insert dom elements without automatic
closure taking place. I checked out jQ and didn't see a flag in the code;
although to be honest I'm not sure I fully understood what's going on in
there ;)
~ ~ Dave
[jQuery] Re: Before automatically closes tags...?
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:56:25 -0400, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just made a quick tweak to .nextUntil() so that it can take a
comma-separated list of items. I updated the demo to reflect this as
well, for example:
$(h2).each(function(){
$(this).nextUntil(h1, h2).wrapAll(div class='note'/div);
});
--John
On 8/2/07, DaveG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:55:20 -, Sam Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is a plugin called nextUntil that you may be able to use. An
example is available at
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/jquery/test/nextuntil.html
I hadn't seen that before. It's close, but not quite what I'm looking
for, as I need to be able to specify a list of next elements: nextUnitl
(h1,h2,h3...). I think amending the function to do that would be
considerable work.
What I'd really like is a way to insert dom elements without automatic
closure taking place. I checked out jQ and didn't see a flag in the code;
although to be honest I'm not sure I fully understood what's going on in
there ;)
~ ~ Dave
[jQuery] Re: where is thickbox reloaded ?
(http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/) is that a popular library. doesnt seem to work on IE 7 though -GTG On 8/1/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry about your back Klaus! :( If you need help in testing please let me know. Since you may be in the code, any chance I can convince you to add some of the animation features found in Lightbox 2 (http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/)? :D Rey Klaus Hartl wrote: Alexandre Plennevaux wrote: is it me or has this promising plugin completely disappeared from this side of the jQniverse? No, it isn't you. It's me stopping to make any promises :-( The JavaScript code in SVN is ready for a first beta release, but I still didn't manage to clean up the CSS. As I have to stay on my couch the next days because I injured my back, maybe I can get that done. Hm, didn't I just say not to make any promises any longer? I should do it soon, I know! --Klaus
[jQuery] Re: Before automatically closes tags...?
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:56:25 -0400, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just made a quick tweak to .nextUntil() so that it can take a
comma-separated list of items. I updated the demo to reflect this as
well, for example:
$(h2).each(function(){
$(this).nextUntil(h1, h2).wrapAll(div class='note'/div);
});
--John
Not sure your patch works. Using:
$(h2,h3,h4,h5).each(function(){
$(this).nextUntil(h1,h2,h3,h4,h5).wrapAll(div class='xxx'/div);
});
I'd interpret this as saying wrap DOM elements between each header element.
That's not what appears to happen. It looks like it wraps from each header
element to the end of the dom. I think this line:
expr = expr[0];
may be the culprit...?
[jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
On Aug 2, 7:54 pm, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it looks great nicolas. but i would sincerely recommend one demo per page. i second Ganeshji's opinion: too many demos on one page. It brings my browser to a near standstill.
[jQuery] Re: Hover accordion (as on apple.com)
I'm silly. Ignore my post. Just needed to put in an if statement that checked if there was more than 1 panel visible. If so, don't do anything on click. On Aug 2, 9:54 am, Dragan Krstic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last version of inverted accordion on:http://www.bydot.net/hoveracc/hoveracc_3.htm Enjoy... 2007/8/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: @John One more thing. I'm getting a serious amount of JavaScript errors, the same error repeated over and over. It seems to happen when i click on a tab while another tab is open. jquery.js (line 321) too much recursion [Break on this error] fn.constructor != Array /function/i.test( fn + ); It happens when you click on header during animations. Take a look on 3) in my previous post. Browser cannot handle so many recursions -- Dragan Krstić krdrhttp://krdr.ebloggy.com/
[jQuery] rowIndex property
I need to know how to access the rowIndex property of a row in a table and I want to assign that to a javascript variable: Something like: var a = $(#tableRow).
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
Hi list, I have been thinking about a how-to/demo/interesting-use-cases kinda site for jquery lately. But, it is not a trivial effort if we want to get it to a state where it will be something jquery community can be proud of. So, i guess it should be more of a community effort with a group of people leading the pack. So, if someone, like one of the leading plugin authors start such an effort i will be more than willing to spend my nights and weekends on such an effort. -GTG On 8/2/07, Mitchell Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The documentation is excellent and one major reason I am here. As a publisher and writer of computer books, I think I know exactly what the best next step would be for improving the docs. Before I sold Waite Group Press to Simon and Schuster we had two very successful lines of language books Bibles (ergo reference guides) How To's (e.g. How Do I..Call a Javascript Function from jQuery) We let IDG (now Wiley) and others do the dummies books because that area of the market was a gold mine if you hit it first. I am hoping we will see a Head First jQuery from O'Rielly and a jQuery Visual QuickStart from Peachpit. We know Karl has a reference book coming out from Packit (you should all preorder it to support our local authors) WHAT IS NEEDED FOR A JQUERY LEARNING RESOURCE I think jQuery could benefit greatly from a simple How To document/book/website addition/etc. If we followed my model the pages would be a collection of How Do I...(do something in jQ) in a standard format. It would need a super table of contents and be set up for searching concepts. The key is picking a range of really really good How To's. If any of you have our old Visual Basic How To that sucker really sold well because we worked very hard picking good examples. I've been thinking about what these might be and have a lot of other ideas. In our books we would start with the most basic uses of jQuery and move up in difficulty and level towards later chapters. We would aim to have How Tos that actually did things that are useful but we would try and keep them short as possible. I have started a How To list because as a novice I am very aware of the simple assumptions the docs make and the very important things you need to know early about syntax and basic concepts. If anyone is interested in working with me on such a project, let me know offline and I will report back here if I spark any interest. Mitch -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry B Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:18 AM To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? I like http://www.visualjquery.com for my jquery documentation... yes there is lots of room for improvements but it's a working and living project which is constantly changing and I think the project managers are doing a great job to date... and demos? look at the plugin pages for demos... imho the core documentation should only be techinical with little to no examples... like the link above, they give a two liner example with before and after expectations that is more then a programmer deserves and is just icing on the cake... asking for demos of the core is like asking the creators for included libraries in any language (like c, c++, etc) to provide demos of the library functions when the coder only needs to know the name, input parameters and the expected output... ~Terry
[jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
it looks great nicolas. Thanks! but i would sincerely recommend one demo per page. It is too straining on the eyes, but i see ur point. OK, I'll do that. -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002
[jQuery] Re: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
Very nice in FF but no go in IE7. Just tried with FF for a start. Too fast - slow down the effects speed so we can really see them. The default duration for each photo is 6 seconds and a half, do you really think it's too fast??? Is this plug in ready for prime time? Not at all, it's just a quick proof of concept. As you mentioned, it needs something more to work on other browsers than just FF. -Nicolas -- Nicolas Brush HOIZEY Clever Age : http://www.clever-age.com/ Gastero Prod : http://www.gasteroprod.com/ Photos : http://www.flickr.com/gp/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/M1c002
[jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought?
I'm in the process of setting up my new site, and I'm building it upon drupal - which I've found supports the use of script tags, and embedding JS within nodes - maybe the plugin repository can be expanded to support demo pages for each plugin, that way its easily available for any plugin in the repository. Of course there would have to be some kind of moderation to stop any malicious code! I'll show my example off once my site is ready to go live. On 02/08/07, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I have been thinking about a how-to/demo/interesting-use-cases kinda site for jquery lately. But, it is not a trivial effort if we want to get it to a state where it will be something jquery community can be proud of. So, i guess it should be more of a community effort with a group of people leading the pack. So, if someone, like one of the leading plugin authors start such an effort i will be more than willing to spend my nights and weekends on such an effort. -GTG On 8/2/07, Mitchell Waite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The documentation is excellent and one major reason I am here. As a publisher and writer of computer books, I think I know exactly what the best next step would be for improving the docs. Before I sold Waite Group Press to Simon and Schuster we had two very successful lines of language books Bibles (ergo reference guides) How To's (e.g. How Do I..Call a Javascript Function from jQuery) We let IDG (now Wiley) and others do the dummies books because that area of the market was a gold mine if you hit it first. I am hoping we will see a Head First jQuery from O'Rielly and a jQuery Visual QuickStart from Peachpit. We know Karl has a reference book coming out from Packit (you should all preorder it to support our local authors) WHAT IS NEEDED FOR A JQUERY LEARNING RESOURCE I think jQuery could benefit greatly from a simple How To document/book/website addition/etc. If we followed my model the pages would be a collection of How Do I...(do something in jQ) in a standard format. It would need a super table of contents and be set up for searching concepts. The key is picking a range of really really good How To's. If any of you have our old Visual Basic How To that sucker really sold well because we worked very hard picking good examples. I've been thinking about what these might be and have a lot of other ideas. In our books we would start with the most basic uses of jQuery and move up in difficulty and level towards later chapters. We would aim to have How Tos that actually did things that are useful but we would try and keep them short as possible. I have started a How To list because as a novice I am very aware of the simple assumptions the docs make and the very important things you need to know early about syntax and basic concepts. If anyone is interested in working with me on such a project, let me know offline and I will report back here if I spark any interest. Mitch -Original Message- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry B Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 7:18 AM To: jQuery (English) Subject: [jQuery] Re: Do you think jQuery's documentation is enought? I like http://www.visualjquery.com for my jquery documentation... yes there is lots of room for improvements but it's a working and living project which is constantly changing and I think the project managers are doing a great job to date... and demos? look at the plugin pages for demos... imho the core documentation should only be techinical with little to no examples... like the link above, they give a two liner example with before and after expectations that is more then a programmer deserves and is just icing on the cake... asking for demos of the core is like asking the creators for included libraries in any language (like c, c++, etc) to provide demos of the library functions when the coder only needs to know the name, input parameters and the expected output... ~Terry -- Tane Piper http://digitalspaghetti.tooum.net This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private
[jQuery] Re: Before automatically closes tags...?
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:12:02 -, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 2, 7:46 pm, DaveG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'd really like is a way to insert dom elements without automatic closure taking place. I checked out jQ and didn't see a flag in the code; although to be honest I'm not sure I fully understood what's going on in there ;) The automatic closure is happening due to HOW the functions like after() and before() are implemented. When you pass HTML to them, they use the browser-supplied DOM functions to create a miniature DOM tree. Your BROWSER is what creates the tree and gives jQuery back a well- formed DOM tree, which jQuery can than append/prepend/whatever to your existing DOM tree. This is, in fact, the only sane way to implement the behaviour, as implementing a full-fledged HTML parser into jQ would increase its size by several times. I was not suggesting that the way it's currently handled was wrong. I'd just like to be able to optionally not have the tag closed, since I want the closure to occur later in the DOM. If I had a means of 'grabbing' the whole block I needed, then the auto-closure would be fine in this case, but at this point I don't have a way to specify 'grab the dom elements between any header level and any other subsequent header level'.
[jQuery] Re: Draw line or polygon like Google Map?
UML-like flow diagrams embedded into pages? I'm sure the canvas tag could be used to make something like this relativly easy? On 02/08/07, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: good idea? I am trying to think of use-cases for it... do u have any real world use case for it off-hand other than maps. -GTG On 8/2/07, howa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Did you played with Google Map? Google Map allow you to draw lines or polygon by providing points array. So wouldn't it be great if we have plugin using jQuery to do the same thing, but no need to related to map, just a general drawing library? howa -- Tane Piper http://digitalspaghetti.tooum.net This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
Mike Miller wrote:
Ok...so this is working somewhat...the issue I see now is that the
find() in the plugins are finding the wrong row.
My table structure looks like this:
table
- row1
- cell 1
-table
row 2
-cell 1
-table
row3
-cell 1
-table
When we use the parents(table eq:(0)) I get a reference to the main
table containing all of the nested tables...however when using the
find...it is finding rows within the nested table.
Is there a way to make the find pertain only to the parent?
Mike
Yes, change this.find('tr') to this.find('tr')
(function($) {
$.fn.moveRowAfter = function(index, afterIndex)
{
this.find(tr).eq(index).insertAfter(this.find(tr).eq(afterIndex));
return this;
};
...
})(jQuery);
Also the code could be optimized a bit to only perform one search for
the rows:
(function($) {
$.fn.moveRowAfter = function(index, afterIndex) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--index).insertAfter(trs.eq(--afterIndex));
return this;
};
$.fn.moveRowBefore = function(index, beforeIndex) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--index).insertBefore(trs.eq(--beforeIndex));
return this;
};
})(jQuery);
Next iteration! :-) The code of both methods looks very similiar, why
not make a single function out of it, save bytes and reduce possible
maintenancing:
jQuery.fn.moveRow = function(from, to, useBefore) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--from)['insert' + (useBefore 'Before' ||
'After')](trs.eq(--to));
return this;
};
Usage:
$('table tbody').moveRow(4, 1); // insert after is default
$('table tbody').moveRow(4, 1, true); // insert before
Cheers, Klaus
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
Ok...so this is working somewhat...the issue I see now is that the
find() in the plugins are finding the wrong row.
My table structure looks like this:
table
- row1
- cell 1
-table
row 2
-cell 1
-table
row3
-cell 1
-table
When we use the parents(table eq:(0)) I get a reference to the main
table containing all of the nested tables...however when using the
find...it is finding rows within the nested table.
Is there a way to make the find pertain only to the parent?
Mike
Yes, change this.find('tr') to this.find('tr')
(function($) {
$.fn.moveRowAfter = function(index, afterIndex)
{
this.find(tr).eq(index).insertAfter(this.find(tr).eq(afterIndex));
return this;
};
...
})(jQuery);
Also the code could be optimized a bit to only perform one search for
the rows:
(function($) {
$.fn.moveRowAfter = function(index, afterIndex) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--index).insertAfter(trs.eq(--afterIndex));
return this;
};
$.fn.moveRowBefore = function(index, beforeIndex) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--index).insertBefore(trs.eq(--beforeIndex));
return this;
};
})(jQuery);
Next iteration! :-) The code of both methods looks very similiar, why
not make a single function out of it, save bytes and reduce possible
maintenancing:
jQuery.fn.moveRow = function(from, to, useBefore) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--from)['insert' + (useBefore 'Before' ||
'After')](trs.eq(--to));
return this;
};
Usage:
$('table tbody').moveRow(4, 1); // insert after is default
$('table tbody').moveRow(4, 1, true); // insert before
Cheers, Klaus
Excuse me, to keep the zero based index, use this:
jQuery.fn.moveRow = function(from, to, useBefore) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(from)['insert' + (useBefore 'Before' ||
'After')](trs.eq(to));
return this;
};
Usage:
$('table tbody').moveRow(3, 0);
--Klaus
[jQuery] Re: 3D carousel?
On 2 août, 19:49, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you going to make it a plugin available on the jQuery site? I thought it was an implementation of the interface 3d carousel on his site. correct me if i am wrong? Yeah, it's just a variation in Stephan's work, with some tweaks to fit the needs of my company. Sorry, I'll have no time to package it soon but download it and use it as it *is* a plugin! Franck. PS: it works for me with FF2, IE6, IE7 and Opera9, not sure about Safari2.
[jQuery] Re: Anything similar to IE's table.moveRow in jquery?
ok Klaus,
Thanks for this...it truly is amazing what jquery can do. A quick
question for you though regarding the index property. If I want to
make this more dynamic...do you know how I would find out the value of
the rowIndex property for the table row I want to move?
On Aug 2, 1:17 pm, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Mike Miller wrote:
Ok...so this is working somewhat...the issue I see now is that the
find() in the plugins are finding the wrong row.
My table structure looks like this:
table
- row1
- cell 1
-table
row 2
-cell 1
-table
row3
-cell 1
-table
When we use the parents(table eq:(0)) I get a reference to the main
table containing all of the nested tables...however when using the
find...it is finding rows within the nested table.
Is there a way to make the find pertain only to the parent?
Mike
Yes, change this.find('tr') to this.find('tr')
(function($) {
$.fn.moveRowAfter = function(index, afterIndex)
{
this.find(tr).eq(index).insertAfter(this.find(tr).eq(afterIndex));
return this;
};
...
})(jQuery);
Also the code could be optimized a bit to only perform one search for
the rows:
(function($) {
$.fn.moveRowAfter = function(index, afterIndex) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--index).insertAfter(trs.eq(--afterIndex));
return this;
};
$.fn.moveRowBefore = function(index, beforeIndex) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--index).insertBefore(trs.eq(--beforeIndex));
return this;
};
})(jQuery);
Next iteration! :-) The code of both methods looks very similiar, why
not make a single function out of it, save bytes and reduce possible
maintenancing:
jQuery.fn.moveRow = function(from, to, useBefore) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(--from)['insert' + (useBefore 'Before' ||
'After')](trs.eq(--to));
return this;
};
Usage:
$('table tbody').moveRow(4, 1); // insert after is default
$('table tbody').moveRow(4, 1, true); // insert before
Cheers, Klaus
Excuse me, to keep the zero based index, use this:
jQuery.fn.moveRow = function(from, to, useBefore) {
var trs = this.find(tr);
trs.eq(from)['insert' + (useBefore 'Before' ||
'After')](trs.eq(to));
return this;
};
Usage:
$('table tbody').moveRow(3, 0);
--Klaus- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[jQuery] .ajax error function
My .ajax call is erroring out and I can't figure out why. Was working fine, and all the sudden quit. I am looking for an example of the .ajax error function. Documentaion says: error (Function) - A function to be called if the request fails. The function gets passed three arguments: The XMLHttpRequest object, a string describing the type of error that occurred and an optional exception object, if one occurred. I tried: error: function(request, settings, expobj). Is that correct? expobj=undefined when I display it. Where can I find a list of errors the .ajax call can return?
