Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Terri via Lincoln
 Not for long.  With every option C vote, Civico inches closer to owning  the 
mall property. Then we can say... I told you so.  

Terri K

On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 12:39:11 PM EST, Margaret Olson 
 wrote:  
 
 The owner of the mall property is the RLF, not Civico.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:36 PM ٍSarah Postlethwait  wrote:

There are already 4 story buildings being proposed at the mall to be able to 
fit the 100 units Civico is insisting on… the only way the mall could add a 
community center is if another floor was added, making it 5 stories. 

At what point do we say that’s enough? 
Sarah PostlethwaitLewis Street
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:53 AM Margaret Olson  wrote:

There is nothing that would prevent the RLF from providing or preserving the 
option of community center space.  And, since it would likely be a long-term 
lease arrangement, it would spread the cost over the life of the lease with the 
upfront construction costs borne by the developer.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:44 AM Lynne Smith  wrote:

Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about including 
the Community Center at the Mall.
Lynne Smith5 Tabor Hill RoadLincoln, MA 01773cell:  781-258-1175ly...@smith.net



On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
Ken, 
You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up at 
different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to provide the 
most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes sense to look at 
them both together while we have the chance. 
Jane

Jane Appell, Ph.D.Sent from my iPad

On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:



Hello LincolnTalkers,With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held 
opinion as an architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to 
remind everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community 
center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in Lincoln 
Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play because of 
the Housing Choice Act.
As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it has long 
been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be deployed 
where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For more than 
ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long Range Plan, in 
which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was overwhelmingly one of the 
highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and in serious need of a catalyst 
to jumpstart its transformation into the compact, vital, walkable village 
center that was a stated goal at the time.  A community center in such a 
location would be the equivalent of an anchor store in a retail setting, and by 
virtue of attracting more people on a regular basis, it would create more 
opportunities for a clustered cross-current of activities spawning greater 
social interaction."  
As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern 
about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better ways 
to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of taxpayer 
money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced urban 
planner, why not include the Community Center as a required accessory use in 
the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station?   
As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to guide 
the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in realizing a 
good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would be a plus to any 
potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant (assuming COA 
long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely designed ground 
level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to Lincoln upfront financing 
for design and construction, replace public project inefficiencies with 
professional development expertise, and as such the new Community Center 
facility may be more affordable to the town's stressed taxpayers."
As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic suburban 
planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the school and, 
like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition, because of school 
protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational co-mingling until 
after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there weren’t a greater  awareness 
about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t it make far more sense to locate 
a community center where there are already other crucial services such as the 
post office, grocery store, cleaners, a cafe and restaurant, not to mention the 
potential for more housing?  
Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote for 
“None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I plan to 
vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already been 
characterized as 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center as part of the mall

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
The town can not dictate a specific tenant to a property owner through any
process. The town can approach a property owner with an appealing offer.
All discussions to date of the proposed mall zoning will permit a use such
as a community center, and I will be very surprised if they do not continue
to do so.

[Note: I am not making any statement about where the community center does
or does not belong, only clarifying what is and is not theoretically
possible]

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:03 PM Peter Buchthal  wrote:

> I respectfully disagree.  I don't believe the Planning Board can specify
> the tenants and the terms for a future community center at the Lincoln
> Mall  as the Mall under Options C and D1-D3 will be developed by right and
> won't require a Town Meeting for a building permit.  I am not an attorney,
> but using google, I did not find any examples of a Town being able to
> pre-reserve space in a development built by right for the Town's use.  If
> you want the possibility of a community center at the Lincoln Mall, choose
> Option E.
>
> Peter Buchthal
> Weston Rd.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:53 PM Margaret Olson 
> wrote:
>
>> The likelihood or not of the community center at the mall is irrelevant
>> to which option is chosen. It is equally likely or unlikely with C as with
>> E, or with any of the D options.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:38 PM Karla Gravis 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Why would including the Community Center as part of the mall be a
>>> "project killer"? We could sign a 10/20/30 year lease. Wouldn't a developer
>>> jump at the chance to have a stable tenant instead of having to deal with
>>> constant retail turnover? Or is this comment an indictment of the viability
>>> of any commercial space at the Mall area?
>>>
>>> According to the town's economic feasibility study, a developer could
>>> consider charging ~$3 per sqft in monthly rent. For a 10,000 sqft CC, that
>>> would mean $360K in yearly rent. Compare that to the town's yearly debt
>>> service payment of $0.77M - $1.54M for the proposed CC designs.  The
>>> savings come from the fact that public buildings are much more costly to
>>> build than what private developments cost.
>>>
>>> In relation to the argument that the CC cannot be in the mall area
>>> because of LEAP, there is no need to have LEAP move to the mall. Remodeling
>>> Pod C (where LEAP is currently hosted) has been estimated at $3.5M. The
>>> non-LEAP portion of the community center designs being put to vote will be
>>> costing the town $12.5M - $21.5M. If the annual cost of the community
>>> center is $360k instead of $1M+, there will surely be some left to renovate
>>> LEAP.
>>>
>>> To be clear, this is not Civico's plan for the mall. If Option C is
>>> chosen, this synergistic combination will likely not happen. However, with
>>> Option E, this could very much be part of the project presented to the
>>> Town. We could tap TCB (The Community Builders - pun intended) to build a
>>> community center and truly affordable housing.
>>>
>>>
>>>

 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:47 Paul Shorb  wrote:

> The CCBC has an FAQ linked here
> 
>  that explains
> why the community center should be located at Hartwell campus (as the Town
> has voted to approve multiple times) rather than at the Mall.
>
> Putting a community center at the Town center would be much more
> expensive, if it could be accomplished at all. As I noted in another
> post just now, shared spaces are efficient, since (A) seniors tend to
> use the facilities in the day and (B) school children do so in the later
> afternoon, walking from the school buildings to participate in Lincoln's
> Parks & Rec programs or LEAP.  Building a separate community center
> at the town center would still leave the town with the need to renovate 
> the
> spaces that would remain at Hartwell; I have heard the estimate of about
> $3.5 million for each of three pods at Hartwell.
>
> Also, I'm not sure how a community center at the Town center could
> actually be achieved. The Town center does not have sufficient
> available Town-owned space to build a community center. You therefore
> suggested including the Community Center as a required accessory use
> in the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station.
> However, despite the rosy theory provided by your urban planning contact, 
> that
> sounds like a project-killer to me.
>
> Dealing with climate change is a big motivator for me. That pushes me
> in the direction of Option C, much more than getting a community center
> somehow forced into a future development of the Mall. If I'm right that 
> "required
> accessory use" would be a project-killer, then we would thus not only
> fail to get a community center built there, but 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center as part of the mall

2023-12-01 Thread Peter Buchthal
I respectfully disagree.  I don't believe the Planning Board can specify
the tenants and the terms for a future community center at the Lincoln
Mall  as the Mall under Options C and D1-D3 will be developed by right and
won't require a Town Meeting for a building permit.  I am not an attorney,
but using google, I did not find any examples of a Town being able to
pre-reserve space in a development built by right for the Town's use.  If
you want the possibility of a community center at the Lincoln Mall, choose
Option E.

Peter Buchthal
Weston Rd.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:53 PM Margaret Olson  wrote:

> The likelihood or not of the community center at the mall is irrelevant to
> which option is chosen. It is equally likely or unlikely with C as with E,
> or with any of the D options.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:38 PM Karla Gravis  wrote:
>
>> Why would including the Community Center as part of the mall be a
>> "project killer"? We could sign a 10/20/30 year lease. Wouldn't a developer
>> jump at the chance to have a stable tenant instead of having to deal with
>> constant retail turnover? Or is this comment an indictment of the viability
>> of any commercial space at the Mall area?
>>
>> According to the town's economic feasibility study, a developer could
>> consider charging ~$3 per sqft in monthly rent. For a 10,000 sqft CC, that
>> would mean $360K in yearly rent. Compare that to the town's yearly debt
>> service payment of $0.77M - $1.54M for the proposed CC designs.  The
>> savings come from the fact that public buildings are much more costly to
>> build than what private developments cost.
>>
>> In relation to the argument that the CC cannot be in the mall area
>> because of LEAP, there is no need to have LEAP move to the mall. Remodeling
>> Pod C (where LEAP is currently hosted) has been estimated at $3.5M. The
>> non-LEAP portion of the community center designs being put to vote will be
>> costing the town $12.5M - $21.5M. If the annual cost of the community
>> center is $360k instead of $1M+, there will surely be some left to renovate
>> LEAP.
>>
>> To be clear, this is not Civico's plan for the mall. If Option C is
>> chosen, this synergistic combination will likely not happen. However, with
>> Option E, this could very much be part of the project presented to the
>> Town. We could tap TCB (The Community Builders - pun intended) to build a
>> community center and truly affordable housing.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:47 Paul Shorb  wrote:
>>>
 The CCBC has an FAQ linked here
 
  that explains
 why the community center should be located at Hartwell campus (as the Town
 has voted to approve multiple times) rather than at the Mall.

 Putting a community center at the Town center would be much more
 expensive, if it could be accomplished at all. As I noted in another
 post just now, shared spaces are efficient, since (A) seniors tend to
 use the facilities in the day and (B) school children do so in the later
 afternoon, walking from the school buildings to participate in Lincoln's
 Parks & Rec programs or LEAP.  Building a separate community center at
 the town center would still leave the town with the need to renovate the
 spaces that would remain at Hartwell; I have heard the estimate of about
 $3.5 million for each of three pods at Hartwell.

 Also, I'm not sure how a community center at the Town center could
 actually be achieved. The Town center does not have sufficient
 available Town-owned space to build a community center. You therefore
 suggested including the Community Center as a required accessory use
 in the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station.
 However, despite the rosy theory provided by your urban planning contact, 
 that
 sounds like a project-killer to me.

 Dealing with climate change is a big motivator for me. That pushes me
 in the direction of Option C, much more than getting a community center
 somehow forced into a future development of the Mall. If I'm right that 
 "required
 accessory use" would be a project-killer, then we would thus not only
 fail to get a community center built there, but also fail to get the
 Mall redeveloped with higher-density near the rail stop and shopping,
 which would be the biggest potential climate win here.

 Paul Shorb
 (a member of the RLF Board but expressing my personal views here)

 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 7:54 AM Ken Hurd  wrote:

> Hello LincolnTalkers,
> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center as part of the mall

2023-12-01 Thread Paul Shorb
You are right, I don't know that it would be a project killer. That was
just my non-expert guess. If the town were willing to pay a high enough
rent for community-center space at a redeveloped Mall, I guess that could
work economically from the developer's point of view.

That would still leave the question of whether that is the kind of
community center that we want to have. Space at the Mall is limited, and
everyone seems to agree about wanting to keep as much commercial space
active there as shoppers will support. So my guess (again, non-expert) is
that a community center squeezed into what would otherwise be ground-floor
commercial space at the Mall would be small and dreary, compared to what
has been sketched out for the roomier, greener Hartwell campus (in
addition to losing the cost efficiencies and social benefits from creating
a multi-programmatic multi-generational space, previously discussed).

In any event, the above questions seem relevant only to what one wants to
vote for in 2024, when a final community center plan is put before Town
Meeting, not to the voting tomorrow. Margaret Olson has pointed out in this
thread that where you think the community center should be should be
irrelevant to which HCA option you cote for, since ending up with a
community center in the town center "is equally likely or unlikely with C
as with E, or with any of the D options". I haven't got my own head fully
wrapped around why that is so -- getting dizzy from trying to follow LT
today --  but I trust her to know!

Paul Shorb
(RLF Board member but sharing my personal views here)

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:38 PM Karla Gravis  wrote:

> Why would including the Community Center as part of the mall be a "project
> killer"? We could sign a 10/20/30 year lease. Wouldn't a developer jump at
> the chance to have a stable tenant instead of having to deal with constant
> retail turnover? Or is this comment an indictment of the viability of any
> commercial space at the Mall area?
>
> According to the town's economic feasibility study, a developer could
> consider charging ~$3 per sqft in monthly rent. For a 10,000 sqft CC, that
> would mean $360K in yearly rent. Compare that to the town's yearly debt
> service payment of $0.77M - $1.54M for the proposed CC designs.  The
> savings come from the fact that public buildings are much more costly to
> build than what private developments cost.
>
> In relation to the argument that the CC cannot be in the mall area because
> of LEAP, there is no need to have LEAP move to the mall. Remodeling Pod C
> (where LEAP is currently hosted) has been estimated at $3.5M. The non-LEAP
> portion of the community center designs being put to vote will be costing
> the town $12.5M - $21.5M. If the annual cost of the community center is
> $360k instead of $1M+, there will surely be some left to renovate LEAP.
>
> To be clear, this is not Civico's plan for the mall. If Option C is
> chosen, this synergistic combination will likely not happen. However, with
> Option E, this could very much be part of the project presented to the
> Town. We could tap TCB (The Community Builders - pun intended) to build a
> community center and truly affordable housing.
>
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:47 Paul Shorb  wrote:
>>
>>> The CCBC has an FAQ linked here
>>> 
>>>  that explains
>>> why the community center should be located at Hartwell campus (as the Town
>>> has voted to approve multiple times) rather than at the Mall.
>>>
>>> Putting a community center at the Town center would be much more
>>> expensive, if it could be accomplished at all. As I noted in another
>>> post just now, shared spaces are efficient, since (A) seniors tend to
>>> use the facilities in the day and (B) school children do so in the later
>>> afternoon, walking from the school buildings to participate in Lincoln's
>>> Parks & Rec programs or LEAP.  Building a separate community center at
>>> the town center would still leave the town with the need to renovate the
>>> spaces that would remain at Hartwell; I have heard the estimate of about
>>> $3.5 million for each of three pods at Hartwell.
>>>
>>> Also, I'm not sure how a community center at the Town center could
>>> actually be achieved. The Town center does not have sufficient
>>> available Town-owned space to build a community center. You therefore
>>> suggested including the Community Center as a required accessory use in
>>> the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station.
>>> However, despite the rosy theory provided by your urban planning contact, 
>>> that
>>> sounds like a project-killer to me.
>>>
>>> Dealing with climate change is a big motivator for me. That pushes me in
>>> the direction of Option C, much more than getting a community center
>>> somehow forced into a future development of the Mall. If I'm right that 
>>> "required
>>> accessory 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center as part of the mall

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
The likelihood or not of the community center at the mall is irrelevant to
which option is chosen. It is equally likely or unlikely with C as with E,
or with any of the D options.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 2:38 PM Karla Gravis  wrote:

> Why would including the Community Center as part of the mall be a "project
> killer"? We could sign a 10/20/30 year lease. Wouldn't a developer jump at
> the chance to have a stable tenant instead of having to deal with constant
> retail turnover? Or is this comment an indictment of the viability of any
> commercial space at the Mall area?
>
> According to the town's economic feasibility study, a developer could
> consider charging ~$3 per sqft in monthly rent. For a 10,000 sqft CC, that
> would mean $360K in yearly rent. Compare that to the town's yearly debt
> service payment of $0.77M - $1.54M for the proposed CC designs.  The
> savings come from the fact that public buildings are much more costly to
> build than what private developments cost.
>
> In relation to the argument that the CC cannot be in the mall area because
> of LEAP, there is no need to have LEAP move to the mall. Remodeling Pod C
> (where LEAP is currently hosted) has been estimated at $3.5M. The non-LEAP
> portion of the community center designs being put to vote will be costing
> the town $12.5M - $21.5M. If the annual cost of the community center is
> $360k instead of $1M+, there will surely be some left to renovate LEAP.
>
> To be clear, this is not Civico's plan for the mall. If Option C is
> chosen, this synergistic combination will likely not happen. However, with
> Option E, this could very much be part of the project presented to the
> Town. We could tap TCB (The Community Builders - pun intended) to build a
> community center and truly affordable housing.
>
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:47 Paul Shorb  wrote:
>>
>>> The CCBC has an FAQ linked here
>>> 
>>>  that explains
>>> why the community center should be located at Hartwell campus (as the Town
>>> has voted to approve multiple times) rather than at the Mall.
>>>
>>> Putting a community center at the Town center would be much more
>>> expensive, if it could be accomplished at all. As I noted in another
>>> post just now, shared spaces are efficient, since (A) seniors tend to
>>> use the facilities in the day and (B) school children do so in the later
>>> afternoon, walking from the school buildings to participate in Lincoln's
>>> Parks & Rec programs or LEAP.  Building a separate community center at
>>> the town center would still leave the town with the need to renovate the
>>> spaces that would remain at Hartwell; I have heard the estimate of about
>>> $3.5 million for each of three pods at Hartwell.
>>>
>>> Also, I'm not sure how a community center at the Town center could
>>> actually be achieved. The Town center does not have sufficient
>>> available Town-owned space to build a community center. You therefore
>>> suggested including the Community Center as a required accessory use in
>>> the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station.
>>> However, despite the rosy theory provided by your urban planning contact, 
>>> that
>>> sounds like a project-killer to me.
>>>
>>> Dealing with climate change is a big motivator for me. That pushes me in
>>> the direction of Option C, much more than getting a community center
>>> somehow forced into a future development of the Mall. If I'm right that 
>>> "required
>>> accessory use" would be a project-killer, then we would thus not only
>>> fail to get a community center built there, but also fail to get the
>>> Mall redeveloped with higher-density near the rail stop and shopping,
>>> which would be the biggest potential climate win here.
>>>
>>> Paul Shorb
>>> (a member of the RLF Board but expressing my personal views here)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 7:54 AM Ken Hurd  wrote:
>>>
 Hello LincolnTalkers,
 With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
 architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
 everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
 center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
 Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
 because of the Housing Choice Act.

 As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
 has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
 deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
 more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
 Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
 overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
 in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
 compact, 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center as part of the mall

2023-12-01 Thread Karla Gravis
Why would including the Community Center as part of the mall be a "project
killer"? We could sign a 10/20/30 year lease. Wouldn't a developer jump at
the chance to have a stable tenant instead of having to deal with constant
retail turnover? Or is this comment an indictment of the viability of any
commercial space at the Mall area?

According to the town's economic feasibility study, a developer could
consider charging ~$3 per sqft in monthly rent. For a 10,000 sqft CC, that
would mean $360K in yearly rent. Compare that to the town's yearly debt
service payment of $0.77M - $1.54M for the proposed CC designs.  The
savings come from the fact that public buildings are much more costly to
build than what private developments cost.

In relation to the argument that the CC cannot be in the mall area because
of LEAP, there is no need to have LEAP move to the mall. Remodeling Pod C
(where LEAP is currently hosted) has been estimated at $3.5M. The non-LEAP
portion of the community center designs being put to vote will be costing
the town $12.5M - $21.5M. If the annual cost of the community center is
$360k instead of $1M+, there will surely be some left to renovate LEAP.

To be clear, this is not Civico's plan for the mall. If Option C is chosen,
this synergistic combination will likely not happen. However, with Option
E, this could very much be part of the project presented to the Town. We
could tap TCB (The Community Builders - pun intended) to build a community
center and truly affordable housing.



>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:47 Paul Shorb  wrote:
>
>> The CCBC has an FAQ linked here
>> 
>>  that explains
>> why the community center should be located at Hartwell campus (as the Town
>> has voted to approve multiple times) rather than at the Mall.
>>
>> Putting a community center at the Town center would be much more
>> expensive, if it could be accomplished at all. As I noted in another
>> post just now, shared spaces are efficient, since (A) seniors tend to
>> use the facilities in the day and (B) school children do so in the later
>> afternoon, walking from the school buildings to participate in Lincoln's
>> Parks & Rec programs or LEAP.  Building a separate community center at
>> the town center would still leave the town with the need to renovate the
>> spaces that would remain at Hartwell; I have heard the estimate of about
>> $3.5 million for each of three pods at Hartwell.
>>
>> Also, I'm not sure how a community center at the Town center could
>> actually be achieved. The Town center does not have sufficient available
>> Town-owned space to build a community center. You therefore suggested 
>> including the
>> Community Center as a required accessory use in the development of a future
>> residential project at Lincoln Station. However, despite the rosy theory
>> provided by your urban planning contact, that sounds like a
>> project-killer to me.
>>
>> Dealing with climate change is a big motivator for me. That pushes me in
>> the direction of Option C, much more than getting a community center
>> somehow forced into a future development of the Mall. If I'm right that 
>> "required
>> accessory use" would be a project-killer, then we would thus not only
>> fail to get a community center built there, but also fail to get the
>> Mall redeveloped with higher-density near the rail stop and shopping,
>> which would be the biggest potential climate win here.
>>
>> Paul Shorb
>> (a member of the RLF Board but expressing my personal views here)
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 7:54 AM Ken Hurd  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>>> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
>>> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
>>> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
>>> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
>>> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
>>> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>>>
>>> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
>>> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
>>> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
>>> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
>>> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
>>> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
>>> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
>>> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
>>> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
>>> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
>>> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
>>> cross-current of activities spawning greater 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
Yes, the zoning by-law is a legal document. Specifically, a law.

Yes, the zoning can contain requirements on glazing.

In zoning there is always a tradeoff between writing very specific
requirements into the zoning and more flexible controls such as special
permits. The advantage to specific requirements for both the town and a
property owner is that everyone knows exactly what is required and exactly
what is permitted. The disadvantage is that any change requires a vote by
town meeting, and between the planning board's need to draft the change,
the legal review, the required public process, and the town meeting
schedule this takes at least a year. That's a long time if the town and the
board realizes that the regulations that seemed right at the time actually
aren't, as happened with our first pass at zoning regulations controlling
rooftop solar. For the lighting portion of our zoning the board started
with incorporating a set of standards into site plan review, gained some
experience, and then incorporated the lighting requirements into zoning
(via a vote at town meeting).

The advantage of a special permit process is it's more flexible. It gives
the town negotiating power as a special permit (as opposed to "by right")
can be withheld.

An example: on height the town could do any of the following in the zoning:
- specify an maximum height by right with no exceptions
- specify a maximum height by right with unspecified additional height
available by special permit from the planning board
- specify a maximum height by right with specific additional height
available by special permit from the planning board
- either of the above special permit processes with the special permit
power given to some other town board.

All of those options have their advantages and disadvantages.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:46 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:

> Right, so Option C and D, when implemented in zoning by-law for March,
> will prevent a community center at the Village Center unless you
> explicitly add a clause to Zoning By-Law that forces that Zone to have 'x'%
> Sq Ft of ground floor that is not housing or parking.  Right now, the draft
> says 60-70% of the ground floor can be housing or parking so there would be
> no way to fit in a full grocery, bank, cleaners etc and a community center
> in these new buildings.  Plus no way a developer would choose this anyway
> because luxury housing is the most profitable.  They have to recoup their
> costs from the high sales price that RLF will command.
>
> Only option E would give us the time and flexibility we need for this
> complex project.  Then the town can hire a master planner/designer to come
> up with an integrated set of options that is more satisfactory to a broader
> set of its constituents.
>
> And per your other point regarding the design guidelines, are you saying
> that these guidelines (e.g. glazing) will be actually added to the zoning
> by-laws which I believe is a legal document?
>
> For the last time, I am not scare-mongering.  This is just a way of trying
> to discredit the analysis I have done.  I and many other volunteers are
> trying very hard to present to folks what is realistic instead of just
> assuming everything will be kittens and rainbows with Option C.  You have
> to look at the details!
>
> Rob Ahlert
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:27 PM Margaret Olson 
> wrote:
>
>> Tomorrow we are voting on the approach to HCA compliance. At a very high
>> level answering the question: Where are we putting the multi-family housing
>> for HCA compliance? This is a "sense of the town" vote. No matter the
>> result of that vote we will not be compliant with the HCA after the vote
>> and we will not have zoning regulations that implement HCA compliance.
>>
>> In March we will vote on the zoning by-law. The zoning by-law will
>> implement the approach chosen on Saturday. The zoning by-law controls the
>> characteristics of the built environment. In addition to height, setback,
>> and story restrictions, zoning by-law specifies what uses are legal (e.g.
>> retail, residential, etc),  what glazing is required (e.g. no blank walls
>> facing the street), parking, the process by which projects are reviewed and
>> approved, inclusionary zoning, for mixed use buildings any restrictions on
>> where the commercial/retail activity is located and the amount of
>> commercial/retail space, and the design guidelines.
>>
>> If the zoning by-law presented at town meeting in March is not acceptable
>> to the town it will be voted down. The planning board will at that point
>> need to solicit additional feedback, adjust the proposed zoning, and try
>> again at a subsequent special town meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:01 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>>
>>> Then why are we having a binding vote tomorrow?
>>>
>>> I guess if we approve Option C, D tomorrow and they write the bylaws in
>>> such a way that prevents a community center, then we can vote down the
>>> whole package in 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Robert Ahlert
Right, so Option C and D, when implemented in zoning by-law for March, will
prevent a community center at the Village Center unless you explicitly add
a clause to Zoning By-Law that forces that Zone to have 'x'% Sq Ft of
ground floor that is not housing or parking.  Right now, the draft says
60-70% of the ground floor can be housing or parking so there would be no
way to fit in a full grocery, bank, cleaners etc and a community center in
these new buildings.  Plus no way a developer would choose this anyway
because luxury housing is the most profitable.  They have to recoup their
costs from the high sales price that RLF will command.

Only option E would give us the time and flexibility we need for this
complex project.  Then the town can hire a master planner/designer to come
up with an integrated set of options that is more satisfactory to a broader
set of its constituents.

And per your other point regarding the design guidelines, are you saying
that these guidelines (e.g. glazing) will be actually added to the zoning
by-laws which I believe is a legal document?

For the last time, I am not scare-mongering.  This is just a way of trying
to discredit the analysis I have done.  I and many other volunteers are
trying very hard to present to folks what is realistic instead of just
assuming everything will be kittens and rainbows with Option C.  You have
to look at the details!

Rob Ahlert

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:27 PM Margaret Olson  wrote:

> Tomorrow we are voting on the approach to HCA compliance. At a very high
> level answering the question: Where are we putting the multi-family housing
> for HCA compliance? This is a "sense of the town" vote. No matter the
> result of that vote we will not be compliant with the HCA after the vote
> and we will not have zoning regulations that implement HCA compliance.
>
> In March we will vote on the zoning by-law. The zoning by-law will
> implement the approach chosen on Saturday. The zoning by-law controls the
> characteristics of the built environment. In addition to height, setback,
> and story restrictions, zoning by-law specifies what uses are legal (e.g.
> retail, residential, etc),  what glazing is required (e.g. no blank walls
> facing the street), parking, the process by which projects are reviewed and
> approved, inclusionary zoning, for mixed use buildings any restrictions on
> where the commercial/retail activity is located and the amount of
> commercial/retail space, and the design guidelines.
>
> If the zoning by-law presented at town meeting in March is not acceptable
> to the town it will be voted down. The planning board will at that point
> need to solicit additional feedback, adjust the proposed zoning, and try
> again at a subsequent special town meeting.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:01 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>
>> Then why are we having a binding vote tomorrow?
>>
>> I guess if we approve Option C, D tomorrow and they write the bylaws in
>> such a way that prevents a community center, then we can vote down the
>> whole package in March.
>>
>> Option C and D lock us in with HCA zoning on the mall which essentially
>> means no community center. How do you build a community center when a
>> developer will only want housing?
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:56 PM DJCP  wrote:
>>
>>> What is she to confirm when nothing has been written or passed??? It's
>>> all drafts. People have been making this point over and over but it's
>>> easier to resort to scare tactics.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 12:54 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>>>
 Let’s ask Margaret to confirm which parts of the zoning bylaws would
 prevent these large structures. As long as it meets the technical
 requirements of the zoning bylaws for that zone, it can be built.

 I watched them working on them the other night and did not see anything
 that would stop this.

 And don’t confuse the zoning bylaws with the site guidelines, which are
 just guidelines for developers to stay in the planning board’s good graces.
 Site guidelines don’t have teeth.

 Happy to be corrected, but these are the types of details that need to
 be explained clearly before we vote. People need to understand what they
 are voting for

 Rob

 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:44 PM RAandBOB 
 wrote:

> You are ignoring the controls provided by the actual zoning bylaw for
> these new by-right parcels. This is just scaremongering.
> Ruth Ann
> (She, her, hers)
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Robert Ahlert 
> wrote:
>
> 
> Thanks for asking.
>
> What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen
> with all of these points up in the air at the same time.
>
> We need more time. We have more time.
>
> I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall
> parking lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail
> 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
There are a number of zoning controls that can control both the size of
buildings and their characteristics. We can do anything from a Texas style
free for all to a Nantucket style mono-style. I presume we will land
somewhere in the middle. We are currently discussing mandating both a
certain level of glazing and glazing transparency (i.e. no blank walls and
no papered or boxed over windows). The design guidelines will (I believe)
discuss articulation (i.e. edges; no long stretches of flat wall). Both the
Friends of Modern Architecture and several architects have already
volunteered to help get this aspect of the zoning right.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:55 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:

> Let’s ask Margaret to confirm which parts of the zoning bylaws would
> prevent these large structures. As long as it meets the technical
> requirements of the zoning bylaws for that zone, it can be built.
>
> I watched them working on them the other night and did not see anything
> that would stop this.
>
> And don’t confuse the zoning bylaws with the site guidelines, which are
> just guidelines for developers to stay in the planning board’s good graces.
> Site guidelines don’t have teeth.
>
> Happy to be corrected, but these are the types of details that need to be
> explained clearly before we vote. People need to understand what they are
> voting for
>
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:44 PM RAandBOB  wrote:
>
>> You are ignoring the controls provided by the actual zoning bylaw for
>> these new by-right parcels. This is just scaremongering.
>> Ruth Ann
>> (She, her, hers)
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Thanks for asking.
>>
>> What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen
>> with all of these points up in the air at the same time.
>>
>> We need more time. We have more time.
>>
>> I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall parking
>> lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail parking lot
>> as well. And maybe even Doherty will have four stories with a special
>> permit from the planning board
>>
>> I just don’t see how this doesn’t happen once this property is HCA zoned
>> and turned over to a for profit developer
>>
>> They won’t want commercial, they won’t want a community center. All they
>> want is luxury housing and parking. And they will get exactly what they
>> want because these parcels are zoned as HCA and the zoning bylaws permit
>> without a special permit
>>
>> If you are in doubt or if you think we need more time, please vote for
>> option E
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:43 AM DJCP  wrote:
>>
>>> Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable
>>> housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Agreed, great idea!

 Only option E would allow community center at the Mall

 Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.

 Rob

 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:

> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>
> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
> Town meeting.
>
> --
> Bob Hicks
> rchi...@gmail.com
>
 --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


>
> --
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

 --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
Tomorrow we are voting on the approach to HCA compliance. At a very high
level answering the question: Where are we putting the multi-family housing
for HCA compliance? This is a "sense of the town" vote. No matter the
result of that vote we will not be compliant with the HCA after the vote
and we will not have zoning regulations that implement HCA compliance.

In March we will vote on the zoning by-law. The zoning by-law will
implement the approach chosen on Saturday. The zoning by-law controls the
characteristics of the built environment. In addition to height, setback,
and story restrictions, zoning by-law specifies what uses are legal (e.g.
retail, residential, etc),  what glazing is required (e.g. no blank walls
facing the street), parking, the process by which projects are reviewed and
approved, inclusionary zoning, for mixed use buildings any restrictions on
where the commercial/retail activity is located and the amount of
commercial/retail space, and the design guidelines.

If the zoning by-law presented at town meeting in March is not acceptable
to the town it will be voted down. The planning board will at that point
need to solicit additional feedback, adjust the proposed zoning, and try
again at a subsequent special town meeting.



On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:01 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:

> Then why are we having a binding vote tomorrow?
>
> I guess if we approve Option C, D tomorrow and they write the bylaws in
> such a way that prevents a community center, then we can vote down the
> whole package in March.
>
> Option C and D lock us in with HCA zoning on the mall which essentially
> means no community center. How do you build a community center when a
> developer will only want housing?
>
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:56 PM DJCP  wrote:
>
>> What is she to confirm when nothing has been written or passed??? It's
>> all drafts. People have been making this point over and over but it's
>> easier to resort to scare tactics.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 12:54 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>>
>>> Let’s ask Margaret to confirm which parts of the zoning bylaws would
>>> prevent these large structures. As long as it meets the technical
>>> requirements of the zoning bylaws for that zone, it can be built.
>>>
>>> I watched them working on them the other night and did not see anything
>>> that would stop this.
>>>
>>> And don’t confuse the zoning bylaws with the site guidelines, which are
>>> just guidelines for developers to stay in the planning board’s good graces.
>>> Site guidelines don’t have teeth.
>>>
>>> Happy to be corrected, but these are the types of details that need to
>>> be explained clearly before we vote. People need to understand what they
>>> are voting for
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:44 PM RAandBOB  wrote:
>>>
 You are ignoring the controls provided by the actual zoning bylaw for
 these new by-right parcels. This is just scaremongering.
 Ruth Ann
 (She, her, hers)

 On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Robert Ahlert  wrote:

 
 Thanks for asking.

 What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen
 with all of these points up in the air at the same time.

 We need more time. We have more time.

 I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall
 parking lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail
 parking lot as well. And maybe even Doherty will have four stories with a
 special permit from the planning board

 I just don’t see how this doesn’t happen once this property is HCA
 zoned and turned over to a for profit developer

 They won’t want commercial, they won’t want a community center. All
 they want is luxury housing and parking. And they will get exactly what
 they want because these parcels are zoned as HCA and the zoning bylaws
 permit without a special permit

 If you are in doubt or if you think we need more time, please vote for
 option E

 Rob



 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:43 AM DJCP  wrote:

> Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable
> housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind?
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert 
> wrote:
>
>> Agreed, great idea!
>>
>> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>>
>> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for
>> housing.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
>>> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>>>
>>> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
>>> Town meeting.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bob Hicks
>>> rchi...@gmail.com
>>>
>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Robert Ahlert
Then why are we having a binding vote tomorrow?

I guess if we approve Option C, D tomorrow and they write the bylaws in
such a way that prevents a community center, then we can vote down the
whole package in March.

Option C and D lock us in with HCA zoning on the mall which essentially
means no community center. How do you build a community center when a
developer will only want housing?

Rob

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:56 PM DJCP  wrote:

> What is she to confirm when nothing has been written or passed??? It's all
> drafts. People have been making this point over and over but it's easier to
> resort to scare tactics.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 12:54 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>
>> Let’s ask Margaret to confirm which parts of the zoning bylaws would
>> prevent these large structures. As long as it meets the technical
>> requirements of the zoning bylaws for that zone, it can be built.
>>
>> I watched them working on them the other night and did not see anything
>> that would stop this.
>>
>> And don’t confuse the zoning bylaws with the site guidelines, which are
>> just guidelines for developers to stay in the planning board’s good graces.
>> Site guidelines don’t have teeth.
>>
>> Happy to be corrected, but these are the types of details that need to be
>> explained clearly before we vote. People need to understand what they are
>> voting for
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:44 PM RAandBOB  wrote:
>>
>>> You are ignoring the controls provided by the actual zoning bylaw for
>>> these new by-right parcels. This is just scaremongering.
>>> Ruth Ann
>>> (She, her, hers)
>>>
>>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> Thanks for asking.
>>>
>>> What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen
>>> with all of these points up in the air at the same time.
>>>
>>> We need more time. We have more time.
>>>
>>> I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall
>>> parking lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail
>>> parking lot as well. And maybe even Doherty will have four stories with a
>>> special permit from the planning board
>>>
>>> I just don’t see how this doesn’t happen once this property is HCA zoned
>>> and turned over to a for profit developer
>>>
>>> They won’t want commercial, they won’t want a community center. All they
>>> want is luxury housing and parking. And they will get exactly what they
>>> want because these parcels are zoned as HCA and the zoning bylaws permit
>>> without a special permit
>>>
>>> If you are in doubt or if you think we need more time, please vote for
>>> option E
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:43 AM DJCP  wrote:
>>>
 Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable
 housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind?

 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert 
 wrote:

> Agreed, great idea!
>
> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>
> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>
>> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
>> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>>
>> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
>> Town meeting.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Hicks
>> rchi...@gmail.com
>>
> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread DJCP
What is she to confirm when nothing has been written or passed??? It's all
drafts. People have been making this point over and over but it's easier to
resort to scare tactics.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 12:54 PM Robert Ahlert  wrote:

> Let’s ask Margaret to confirm which parts of the zoning bylaws would
> prevent these large structures. As long as it meets the technical
> requirements of the zoning bylaws for that zone, it can be built.
>
> I watched them working on them the other night and did not see anything
> that would stop this.
>
> And don’t confuse the zoning bylaws with the site guidelines, which are
> just guidelines for developers to stay in the planning board’s good graces.
> Site guidelines don’t have teeth.
>
> Happy to be corrected, but these are the types of details that need to be
> explained clearly before we vote. People need to understand what they are
> voting for
>
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:44 PM RAandBOB  wrote:
>
>> You are ignoring the controls provided by the actual zoning bylaw for
>> these new by-right parcels. This is just scaremongering.
>> Ruth Ann
>> (She, her, hers)
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Thanks for asking.
>>
>> What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen
>> with all of these points up in the air at the same time.
>>
>> We need more time. We have more time.
>>
>> I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall parking
>> lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail parking lot
>> as well. And maybe even Doherty will have four stories with a special
>> permit from the planning board
>>
>> I just don’t see how this doesn’t happen once this property is HCA zoned
>> and turned over to a for profit developer
>>
>> They won’t want commercial, they won’t want a community center. All they
>> want is luxury housing and parking. And they will get exactly what they
>> want because these parcels are zoned as HCA and the zoning bylaws permit
>> without a special permit
>>
>> If you are in doubt or if you think we need more time, please vote for
>> option E
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:43 AM DJCP  wrote:
>>
>>> Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable
>>> housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Agreed, great idea!

 Only option E would allow community center at the Mall

 Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.

 Rob

 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:

> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>
> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
> Town meeting.
>
> --
> Bob Hicks
> rchi...@gmail.com
>
 --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


>
> --
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

 --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Robert Ahlert
Let’s ask Margaret to confirm which parts of the zoning bylaws would
prevent these large structures. As long as it meets the technical
requirements of the zoning bylaws for that zone, it can be built.

I watched them working on them the other night and did not see anything
that would stop this.

And don’t confuse the zoning bylaws with the site guidelines, which are
just guidelines for developers to stay in the planning board’s good graces.
Site guidelines don’t have teeth.

Happy to be corrected, but these are the types of details that need to be
explained clearly before we vote. People need to understand what they are
voting for

Rob

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:44 PM RAandBOB  wrote:

> You are ignoring the controls provided by the actual zoning bylaw for
> these new by-right parcels. This is just scaremongering.
> Ruth Ann
> (She, her, hers)
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>
> 
> Thanks for asking.
>
> What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen with
> all of these points up in the air at the same time.
>
> We need more time. We have more time.
>
> I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall parking
> lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail parking lot
> as well. And maybe even Doherty will have four stories with a special
> permit from the planning board
>
> I just don’t see how this doesn’t happen once this property is HCA zoned
> and turned over to a for profit developer
>
> They won’t want commercial, they won’t want a community center. All they
> want is luxury housing and parking. And they will get exactly what they
> want because these parcels are zoned as HCA and the zoning bylaws permit
> without a special permit
>
> If you are in doubt or if you think we need more time, please vote for
> option E
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:43 AM DJCP  wrote:
>
>> Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable
>> housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind?
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed, great idea!
>>>
>>> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>>>
>>> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>>>
 I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
 included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.

 Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
 Town meeting.

 --
 Bob Hicks
 rchi...@gmail.com

>>> --
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>>

 --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Paul Shorb
The CCBC has an FAQ linked here

that explains
why the community center should be located at Hartwell campus (as the Town
has voted to approve multiple times) rather than at the Mall.

Putting a community center at the Town center would be much more expensive,
if it could be accomplished at all. As I noted in another post just now, shared
spaces are efficient, since (A) seniors tend to use the facilities in the
day and (B) school children do so in the later afternoon, walking from the
school buildings to participate in Lincoln's Parks & Rec programs or
LEAP.  Building
a separate community center at the town center would still leave the town
with the need to renovate the spaces that would remain at Hartwell; I have
heard the estimate of about $3.5 million for each of three pods at Hartwell.

Also, I'm not sure how a community center at the Town center could actually
be achieved. The Town center does not have sufficient available Town-owned
space to build a community center. You therefore suggested including the
Community Center as a required accessory use in the development of a future
residential project at Lincoln Station. However, despite the rosy theory
provided by your urban planning contact, that sounds like a project-killer
to me.

Dealing with climate change is a big motivator for me. That pushes me in
the direction of Option C, much more than getting a community center
somehow forced into a future development of the Mall. If I'm right
that "required
accessory use" would be a project-killer, then we would thus not only fail
to get a community center built there, but also fail to get the
Mall redeveloped with higher-density near the rail stop and shopping, which
would be the biggest potential climate win here.

Paul Shorb
(a member of the RLF Board but expressing my personal views here)

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 7:54 AM Ken Hurd  wrote:

> Hello LincolnTalkers,
> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>
> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>
> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern
> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better
> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of
> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced
> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required
> accessory use in the development of a future residential project at
> Lincoln Station?
>
> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
> stressed taxpayers."
>
> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
> other crucial 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Robert Ahlert
Wait, if the RLF 4 acres is rezoned HCA, then wouldn’t it be sold to a
private developer?

Do you think that they would create a rental space that might then be
utilized for COA activities?  Is that what you were suggesting would happen
Margaret?

Just trying to understand how we can make this happen.

Maybe the commuter rail lot would be better for this?

Rob

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:05 PM Lynne Smith  wrote:

> Thank you for the clarification, Margaret.
>
> Lynne Smith
> 5 Tabor Hill Road
> Lincoln, MA 01773
> cell:  781-258-1175
> ly...@smith.net
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:52 AM, Margaret Olson  wrote:
>
> There is nothing that would prevent the RLF from providing or preserving
> the option of community center space.  And, since it would likely be a
> long-term lease arrangement, it would spread the cost over the life of the
> lease with the upfront construction costs borne by the developer.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:44 AM Lynne Smith  wrote:
>
>> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about
>> including the Community Center at the Mall.
>>
>> Lynne Smith
>> 5 Tabor Hill Road
>> Lincoln, MA 01773
>> cell:  781-258-1175
>> ly...@smith.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up
>> at different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to
>> provide the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes
>> sense to look at them both together while we have the chance.
>>
>> Jane
>>
>>
>> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
>>
>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
>> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
>> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
>> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
>> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
>> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>>
>> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
>> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
>> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
>> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
>> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
>> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
>> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
>> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
>> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
>> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
>> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
>> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>>
>> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious
>> concern about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are
>> better ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24
>> million of taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an
>> experienced urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a
>> required accessory use in the development of a future residential
>> project at Lincoln Station?
>>
>> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
>> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
>> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
>> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
>> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
>> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
>> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
>> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
>> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
>> stressed taxpayers."
>>
>> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
>> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
>> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
>> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
>> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
>> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
>> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
>> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
>> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?
>>
>> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote
>> for “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread RAandBOB
You are ignoring the controls provided by the actual zoning bylaw for these new by-right parcels. This is just scaremongering.Ruth Ann(She, her, hers)On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:59 AM, Robert Ahlert  wrote:Thanks for asking.What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen with all of these points up in the air at the same time.We need more time. We have more time.I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall parking lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail parking lot as well. And maybe even Doherty will have four stories with a special permit from the planning boardI just don’t see how this doesn’t happen once this property is HCA zoned and turned over to a for profit developerThey won’t want commercial, they won’t want a community center. All they want is luxury housing and parking. And they will get exactly what they want because these parcels are zoned as HCA and the zoning bylaws permit without a special permitIf you are in doubt or if you think we need more time, please vote for option ERobOn Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:43 AM DJCP  wrote:Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind? On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert  wrote:Agreed, great idea!Only option E would allow community center at the MallElse, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.RobOn Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town meeting.-- Bob Hicksrchi...@gmail.com
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
The owner of the mall property is the RLF, not Civico.


On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:36 PM ٍSarah Postlethwait 
wrote:

> There are already 4 story buildings being proposed at the mall to be able
> to fit the 100 units Civico is insisting on… the only way the mall could
> add a community center is if another floor was added, making it 5 stories.
>
> At what point do we say that’s enough?
>
> Sarah Postlethwait
> Lewis Street
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:53 AM Margaret Olson 
> wrote:
>
>> There is nothing that would prevent the RLF from providing or preserving
>> the option of community center space.  And, since it would likely be a
>> long-term lease arrangement, it would spread the cost over the life of the
>> lease with the upfront construction costs borne by the developer.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:44 AM Lynne Smith  wrote:
>>
>>> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about
>>> including the Community Center at the Mall.
>>>
>>> Lynne Smith
>>> 5 Tabor Hill Road
>>> 
>>> Lincoln, MA 01773
>>> 
>>> cell:  781-258-1175
>>> ly...@smith.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
>>>
>>> Ken,
>>>
>>> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up
>>> at different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to
>>> provide the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes
>>> sense to look at them both together while we have the chance.
>>>
>>> Jane
>>>
>>>
>>> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>>> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
>>> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
>>> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
>>> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
>>> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
>>> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>>>
>>> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
>>> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
>>> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
>>> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
>>> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
>>> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
>>> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
>>> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
>>> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
>>> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
>>> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
>>> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>>>
>>> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious
>>> concern about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are
>>> better ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24
>>> million of taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an
>>> experienced urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a
>>> required accessory use in the development of a future residential
>>> project at Lincoln Station?
>>>
>>> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
>>> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
>>> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It
>>> would be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed
>>> tenant (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in
>>> purposely designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the
>>> cost to Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace
>>> public project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and
>>> as such the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the
>>> town's stressed taxpayers."
>>>
>>> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
>>> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
>>> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
>>> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
>>> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
>>> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
>>> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
>>> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
>>> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread ٍSarah Postlethwait
There are already 4 story buildings being proposed at the mall to be able
to fit the 100 units Civico is insisting on… the only way the mall could
add a community center is if another floor was added, making it 5 stories.

At what point do we say that’s enough?

Sarah Postlethwait
Lewis Street

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:53 AM Margaret Olson 
wrote:

> There is nothing that would prevent the RLF from providing or preserving
> the option of community center space.  And, since it would likely be a
> long-term lease arrangement, it would spread the cost over the life of the
> lease with the upfront construction costs borne by the developer.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:44 AM Lynne Smith  wrote:
>
>> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about
>> including the Community Center at the Mall.
>>
>> Lynne Smith
>> 5 Tabor Hill Road
>> 
>> Lincoln, MA 01773
>> 
>> cell:  781-258-1175
>> ly...@smith.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up
>> at different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to
>> provide the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes
>> sense to look at them both together while we have the chance.
>>
>> Jane
>>
>>
>> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
>>
>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
>> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
>> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
>> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
>> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
>> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>>
>> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
>> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
>> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
>> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
>> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
>> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
>> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
>> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
>> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
>> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
>> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
>> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>>
>> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious
>> concern about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are
>> better ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24
>> million of taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an
>> experienced urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a
>> required accessory use in the development of a future residential
>> project at Lincoln Station?
>>
>> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
>> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
>> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
>> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
>> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
>> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
>> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
>> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
>> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
>> stressed taxpayers."
>>
>> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
>> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
>> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
>> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
>> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
>> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
>> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
>> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
>> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?
>>
>> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote
>> for “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I
>> plan to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Paul Shorb
LEAP will not be moved 2/3 mile down the road; in any of the Hartwell-based
community center plan options, it will remain at the existing Hartwell
campus. Thus children will continue to be able to walk from school, as they
do now, to after-school programs run by the Town Parks & Rec Dept or to
LEAP daycare.

Those programs obviously need to remain at the Hartwell campus. If we don't
build the community center there, we'll still need to renovate
the old Hartwell pods for their current uses. I have heard an estimate of
$3.5 million per pod for each of those three pods (perhaps someone on
the CCBC could confirm). So among other considerations, there is a great
cost efficiency in remaking the Hartwell campus so it can both serve those
functions and the additional functions that have been proposed for an
inter-generational community center.

Paul Shorb
(on the RLF Board, but providing my personal view here)

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:31 AM V Saleme  wrote:

> Perhaps this has been discussed however and should LEAP be moved 2/3 of a
> mile down the road, how do we propose getting the children from the school
> to there as opposed to walking or being chaperoned (by staff) to current
> facility?
>
> VS
> —-
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:17 AM John Mendelson 
> wrote:
>
>> The myriad reasons why the Community Center (remember it is planned to
>> accommodate the COA, LEAP, and Parks & Rec) should NOT be located at the
>> mall have been well documented by the folks who've worked on the community
>> center plans for almost a decade.  The location at the Hartwells ie right
>> in the middle of our "institutional core" and easily accessible by walking,
>> biking, or driving.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:20 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>>
>>> point well made
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Robert Ahlert 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Agreed, great idea!

 Only option E would allow community center at the Mall

 Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.

 Rob

 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:

> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>
> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
> Town meeting.
>
> --
> Bob Hicks
> rchi...@gmail.com
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bob Hicks
>>> rchi...@gmail.com
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Barbara Low
Thank you.



From: Lincoln  on behalf of John Mendelson 

Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 11:17 AM
To: Robert Hicks 
Cc: Lincoln Talk 
Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

The myriad reasons why the Community Center (remember it is planned to 
accommodate the COA, LEAP, and Parks & Rec) should NOT be located at the mall 
have been well documented by the folks who've worked on the community center 
plans for almost a decade.  The location at the Hartwells ie right in the 
middle of our "institutional core" and easily accessible by walking, biking, or 
driving.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:20 AM Robert Hicks 
mailto:rchi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
point well made

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Robert Ahlert 
mailto:robahl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Agreed, great idea!

Only option E would allow community center at the Mall

Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.

Rob

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks 
mailto:rchi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be included 
as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.

Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town 
meeting.

--
Bob Hicks
rchi...@gmail.com<mailto:rchi...@gmail.com>
--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org<mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



--
Bob Hicks
rchi...@gmail.com<mailto:rchi...@gmail.com>
--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org<mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Lynn DeLisi, M.D. via Lincoln
 Dear Ken,I totally agree with you. The more I see of the details for having a 
Community Center built on the school site, the more I see this as the wrong 
choice.I want the Town to have a Community Center, particularly to improve the 
space for seniors, but the school campus will not allow this because it needs 
to serve supplementary school programs as well there, such as an after school 
daycare program. The Traffic problem will lead to safety issues. Among many 
other reasons, the Lincoln station area is the better location. Why talk about 
putting housing units on the commuter lot when a community center could be 
there, if it is not going to be used for the commuter lot? There are other 
nearby possibilities as well that have not been looked at extensively.
But the vote tomorrow does not allow for a "none of these choices". So how do 
we see that this message is heard?The vote will look like the Town wants one of 
the 3!Why waste the architect's time from now until March?
Lynn DeLisiSouth Great Road On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 07:54:44 AM EST, 
Ken Hurd  wrote:  
 
 Hello LincolnTalkers,With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held 
opinion as an architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to 
remind everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community 
center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in Lincoln 
Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play because of 
the Housing Choice Act.
As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it has long 
been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be deployed 
where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For more than 
ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long Range Plan, in 
which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was overwhelmingly one of the 
highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and in serious need of a catalyst 
to jumpstart its transformation into the compact, vital, walkable village 
center that was a stated goal at the time.  A community center in such a 
location would be the equivalent of an anchor store in a retail setting, and by 
virtue of attracting more people on a regular basis, it would create more 
opportunities for a clustered cross-current of activities spawning greater 
social interaction."  
As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern 
about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better ways 
to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of taxpayer 
money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced urban 
planner, why not include the Community Center as a required accessory use in 
the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station?   
As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to guide 
the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in realizing a 
good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would be a plus to any 
potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant (assuming COA 
long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely designed ground 
level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to Lincoln upfront financing 
for design and construction, replace public project inefficiencies with 
professional development expertise, and as such the new Community Center 
facility may be more affordable to the town's stressed taxpayers."
As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic suburban 
planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the school and, 
like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition, because of school 
protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational co-mingling until 
after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there weren’t a greater  awareness 
about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t it make far more sense to locate 
a community center where there are already other crucial services such as the 
post office, grocery store, cleaners, a cafe and restaurant, not to mention the 
potential for more housing?  
Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote for 
“None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I plan to 
vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already been 
characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what we 
already have at Bemis.
Please join me in rejecting the more expensive options 1 and 2 in order to 
redirect our efforts to take advantage of this moment in time to be far more 
creative, innovative and holistic in how we design and fund a Community Center 
that can also help transform Lincoln Station to its full potential as a truly 
vital, walkable village center.  Remember,

      we humans shape our environments at a moment in time, 

and then they shape us for decades to come.

Respectfully,Ken 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Tony Liepert
Hi All,
I've been reading with great interest the discussion about locating the
Community Center at the Mall (Town Center).

My take on this opportunity is different but aligns with comments that
Peter Buchtal has made several times on LT.

I've never understood, nor bought the argument, that LEAP, Parks and Rec
(PR), and Council on Aging (COA) should all be co-located, and would
benefit from being co-located. I also agree with Ken Hurd about suburban
architecture mistakes that require a car for access.

With the recent revelation that mixed-use development could count towards
HCA requirements, a re-examination of that basic assumption is warranted.

LEAP, and Parks and Rec, should stay on the school campus. They operate
independently of COA and would continue to do so.

COA should be located at the Mall and would become an anchor tenant there.
Seniors attending COA activities at the Mall could also do their shopping,
banking, eating, etc, thereby supporting the commercial tenants at the
Mall. If the Mall buildout is done correctly, seniors would be drawn to
down-sizing to the Mall area, freeing up their larger houses (and yards!)
to new families in town.

Seniors also have fewer cars, and don't drive them during rush hours.

Comments welcome,
Tony

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:19 AM John Mendelson 
wrote:

> The myriad reasons why the Community Center (remember it is planned to
> accommodate the COA, LEAP, and Parks & Rec) should NOT be located at the
> mall have been well documented by the folks who've worked on the community
> center plans for almost a decade.  The location at the Hartwells ie right
> in the middle of our "institutional core" and easily accessible by walking,
> biking, or driving.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:20 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>
>> point well made
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Robert Ahlert 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed, great idea!
>>>
>>> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>>>
>>> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>>>
 I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
 included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.

 Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
 Town meeting.

 --
 Bob Hicks
 rchi...@gmail.com
 --
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


>>
>> --
>> Bob Hicks
>> rchi...@gmail.com
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>

-- 
Tony Liepert
tliep...@gmail.com
617 633 3521 (cell)
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Lynne Smith
Thank you for the clarification, Margaret.

Lynne Smith
5 Tabor Hill Road
Lincoln, MA 01773
cell:  781-258-1175
ly...@smith.net



> On Dec 1, 2023, at 11:52 AM, Margaret Olson  wrote:
> 
> There is nothing that would prevent the RLF from providing or preserving the 
> option of community center space.  And, since it would likely be a long-term 
> lease arrangement, it would spread the cost over the life of the lease with 
> the upfront construction costs borne by the developer.
> 
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:44 AM Lynne Smith  > wrote:
> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about including 
> the Community Center at the Mall.
> 
> Lynne Smith
> 5 Tabor Hill Road
> Lincoln, MA 01773
> cell:  781-258-1175
> ly...@smith.net 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell > > wrote:
>> 
>> Ken, 
>> 
>> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up at 
>> different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to provide 
>> the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes sense to 
>> look at them both together while we have the chance. 
>> 
>> Jane
>> 
>> 
>> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>>> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an 
>>> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind 
>>> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community 
>>> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in 
>>> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play 
>>> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>>> 
>>> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it has 
>>> long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be 
>>> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For 
>>> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long 
>>> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was 
>>> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and 
>>> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the 
>>> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the time. 
>>>  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an anchor 
>>> store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people on a 
>>> regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered 
>>> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."  
>>> 
>>> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern 
>>> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better 
>>> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of 
>>> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced 
>>> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required accessory 
>>> use in the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station?  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to 
>>> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in 
>>> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would be 
>>> a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant 
>>> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely 
>>> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to 
>>> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public 
>>> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such 
>>> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's 
>>> stressed taxpayers."
>>> 
>>> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic 
>>> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the 
>>> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition, 
>>> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational 
>>> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there 
>>> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t 
>>> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already 
>>> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a 
>>> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?  
>>> 
>>> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote for 
>>> “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I 
>>> plan to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already 
>>> been characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what 
>>> we already have 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Robert Ahlert
Thanks for asking.

What I want is a well thought out design process, which cannot happen with
all of these points up in the air at the same time.

We need more time. We have more time.

I’m worried about large monolithic housing structures in the mall parking
lot and eventually replacing Donelan’s and on the commuter rail parking lot
as well. And maybe even Doherty will have four stories with a special
permit from the planning board

I just don’t see how this doesn’t happen once this property is HCA zoned
and turned over to a for profit developer

They won’t want commercial, they won’t want a community center. All they
want is luxury housing and parking. And they will get exactly what they
want because these parcels are zoned as HCA and the zoning bylaws permit
without a special permit

If you are in doubt or if you think we need more time, please vote for
option E

Rob



On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:43 AM DJCP  wrote:

> Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable
> housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind?
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>
>> Agreed, great idea!
>>
>> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>>
>> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>>
>>> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
>>> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>>>
>>> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bob Hicks
>>> rchi...@gmail.com
>>>
>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Scott Clary
So when it comes time for the community center vote, residents can ask that
"a none of the above" option gets written in.

Kind Regards,

Scott Clary
617-968-5769

Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 10:52 AM Chris McCarthy  wrote:

> But none of the community center voting options options include the
> possibility locating at the mall, right? Nor do I believe there was any
> discussion about this beyond "ain't happening".
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 10:44 Lynne Smith  wrote:
>
>> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about
>> including the Community Center at the Mall.
>>
>> Lynne Smith
>> 5 Tabor Hill Road
>> Lincoln, MA 01773
>> cell:  781-258-1175
>> ly...@smith.net
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
>>
>> Ken,
>>
>> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up
>> at different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to
>> provide the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes
>> sense to look at them both together while we have the chance.
>>
>> Jane
>>
>>
>> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
>>
>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
>> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
>> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
>> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
>> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
>> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>>
>> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
>> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
>> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
>> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
>> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
>> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
>> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
>> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
>> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
>> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
>> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
>> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>>
>> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious
>> concern about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are
>> better ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24
>> million of taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an
>> experienced urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a
>> required accessory use in the development of a future residential
>> project at Lincoln Station?
>>
>> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
>> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
>> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
>> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
>> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
>> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
>> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
>> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
>> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
>> stressed taxpayers."
>>
>> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
>> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
>> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
>> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
>> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
>> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
>> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
>> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
>> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?
>>
>> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote
>> for “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I
>> plan to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already
>> been characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what
>> we already have at Bemis.
>>
>> Please join me in rejecting the more expensive options 1 and 2 in order
>> to redirect our efforts to take advantage of this moment in time to be far
>> more creative, innovative and holistic in how we design and fund a
>> 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
There is nothing that would prevent the RLF from providing or preserving
the option of community center space.  And, since it would likely be a
long-term lease arrangement, it would spread the cost over the life of the
lease with the upfront construction costs borne by the developer.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:44 AM Lynne Smith  wrote:

> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about
> including the Community Center at the Mall.
>
> Lynne Smith
> 5 Tabor Hill Road
> Lincoln, MA 01773
> cell:  781-258-1175
> ly...@smith.net
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
>
> Ken,
>
> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up at
> different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to provide
> the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes sense to
> look at them both together while we have the chance.
>
> Jane
>
>
> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
>
> Hello LincolnTalkers,
> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>
> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>
> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern
> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better
> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of
> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced
> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required
> accessory use in the development of a future residential project at
> Lincoln Station?
>
> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
> stressed taxpayers."
>
> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?
>
> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote
> for “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I
> plan to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already
> been characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what
> we already have at Bemis.
>
> Please join me in rejecting the more expensive options 1 and 2 in order to
> redirect our efforts to take advantage of this moment in time to be far
> more creative, innovative and holistic in how we design and fund a
> Community Center that can also help transform Lincoln Station to its full
> potential as a truly vital, walkable village center.  Remember,
>
>   we humans *shape our environments* at a moment in time,
> and *then they shape us* for decades to come.
>
> Respectfully,
> Ken 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Scott Clary
I agree wholeheartedly got the community center should be at the mall.

And the ONLY way that could happen is if option E is chosen tomorrow at
town meeting. Please everyone show up and vote. if you're unsure, vote for
E because it gives us more critical time and control.

Kind Regards,

Scott Clary
617-968-5769

Sent from a mobile device - please excuse typos and errors

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 10:20 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:

> point well made
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>
>> Agreed, great idea!
>>
>> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>>
>> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>>
>>> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
>>> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>>>
>>> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bob Hicks
>>> rchi...@gmail.com
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Bob Hicks
> rchi...@gmail.com
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread DJCP
Do you want a community center at the mall or do you want affordable
housing and commercial space?  Can you please make up your mind?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:08 AM Robert Ahlert  wrote:

> Agreed, great idea!
>
> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>
> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>
>> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
>> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>>
>> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town
>> meeting.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Hicks
>> rchi...@gmail.com
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread V Saleme
Perhaps this has been discussed however and should LEAP be moved 2/3 of a
mile down the road, how do we propose getting the children from the school
to there as opposed to walking or being chaperoned (by staff) to current
facility?

VS
—-

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:17 AM John Mendelson 
wrote:

> The myriad reasons why the Community Center (remember it is planned to
> accommodate the COA, LEAP, and Parks & Rec) should NOT be located at the
> mall have been well documented by the folks who've worked on the community
> center plans for almost a decade.  The location at the Hartwells ie right
> in the middle of our "institutional core" and easily accessible by walking,
> biking, or driving.
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:20 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>
>> point well made
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Robert Ahlert 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed, great idea!
>>>
>>> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>>>
>>> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>>>
 I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
 included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.

 Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special
 Town meeting.

 --
 Bob Hicks
 rchi...@gmail.com
 --
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


>>
>> --
>> Bob Hicks
>> rchi...@gmail.com
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread John Mendelson
The myriad reasons why the Community Center (remember it is planned to
accommodate the COA, LEAP, and Parks & Rec) should NOT be located at the
mall have been well documented by the folks who've worked on the community
center plans for almost a decade.  The location at the Hartwells ie right
in the middle of our "institutional core" and easily accessible by walking,
biking, or driving.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:20 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:

> point well made
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Robert Ahlert  wrote:
>
>> Agreed, great idea!
>>
>> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>>
>> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>>
>>> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
>>> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>>>
>>> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bob Hicks
>>> rchi...@gmail.com
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Bob Hicks
> rchi...@gmail.com
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Margaret Olson
How do you come to that conclusion?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:44 AM Lynne Smith  wrote:

> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about
> including the Community Center at the Mall.
>
> Lynne Smith
> 5 Tabor Hill Road
> 
> Lincoln, MA 01773
> 
> cell:  781-258-1175
> ly...@smith.net
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
>
> Ken,
>
> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up at
> different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to provide
> the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes sense to
> look at them both together while we have the chance.
>
> Jane
>
>
> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
>
> Hello LincolnTalkers,
> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>
> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>
> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern
> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better
> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of
> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced
> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required
> accessory use in the development of a future residential project at
> Lincoln Station?
>
> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
> stressed taxpayers."
>
> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?
>
> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote
> for “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I
> plan to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already
> been characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what
> we already have at Bemis.
>
> Please join me in rejecting the more expensive options 1 and 2 in order to
> redirect our efforts to take advantage of this moment in time to be far
> more creative, innovative and holistic in how we design and fund a
> Community Center that can also help transform Lincoln Station to its full
> potential as a truly vital, walkable village center.  Remember,
>
>   we humans *shape our environments* at a moment in time,
> and *then they shape us* for decades to come.
>
> Respectfully,
> Ken Hurd
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Chris McCarthy
But none of the community center voting options options include the
possibility locating at the mall, right? Nor do I believe there was any
discussion about this beyond "ain't happening".



On Fri, Dec 1, 2023, 10:44 Lynne Smith  wrote:

> Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about
> including the Community Center at the Mall.
>
> Lynne Smith
> 5 Tabor Hill Road
> Lincoln, MA 01773
> cell:  781-258-1175
> ly...@smith.net
>
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
>
> Ken,
>
> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up at
> different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to provide
> the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes sense to
> look at them both together while we have the chance.
>
> Jane
>
>
> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
>
> Hello LincolnTalkers,
> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>
> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>
> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern
> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better
> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of
> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced
> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required
> accessory use in the development of a future residential project at
> Lincoln Station?
>
> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
> stressed taxpayers."
>
> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?
>
> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote
> for “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I
> plan to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already
> been characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what
> we already have at Bemis.
>
> Please join me in rejecting the more expensive options 1 and 2 in order to
> redirect our efforts to take advantage of this moment in time to be far
> more creative, innovative and holistic in how we design and fund a
> Community Center that can also help transform Lincoln Station to its full
> potential as a truly vital, walkable village center.  Remember,
>
>   we humans *shape our environments* at a moment in time,
> and *then they shape us* for decades to come.
>
> Respectfully,
> Ken Hurd
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Lynne Smith
Option E is the only HCA option that would allow us to think about including 
the Community Center at the Mall.

Lynne Smith
5 Tabor Hill Road
Lincoln, MA 01773
cell:  781-258-1175
ly...@smith.net



> On Dec 1, 2023, at 8:53 AM, Jane Appell  wrote:
> 
> Ken, 
> 
> You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up at 
> different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to provide 
> the most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes sense to 
> look at them both together while we have the chance. 
> 
> Jane
> 
> 
> Jane Appell, Ph.D.
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hello LincolnTalkers,
>> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an 
>> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind everyone 
>> why I and many others believe we should not build a community center on the 
>> school campus.  I still believe it should be located in Lincoln Station, 
>> particularly now that our small commercial area is in play because of the 
>> Housing Choice Act.
>> 
>> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it has 
>> long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be 
>> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For 
>> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long Range 
>> Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was overwhelmingly one 
>> of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and in serious need of 
>> a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the compact, vital, walkable 
>> village center that was a stated goal at the time.  A community center in 
>> such a location would be the equivalent of an anchor store in a retail 
>> setting, and by virtue of attracting more people on a regular basis, it 
>> would create more opportunities for a clustered cross-current of activities 
>> spawning greater social interaction."  
>> 
>> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern 
>> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better 
>> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of 
>> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced 
>> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required accessory 
>> use in the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station?   
>> 
>> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to guide 
>> the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in realizing a 
>> good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would be a plus to 
>> any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant (assuming COA 
>> long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely designed ground 
>> level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to Lincoln upfront 
>> financing for design and construction, replace public project inefficiencies 
>> with professional development expertise, and as such the new Community 
>> Center facility may be more affordable to the town's stressed taxpayers."
>> 
>> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic 
>> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the 
>> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition, 
>> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational 
>> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there weren’t 
>> a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t it make 
>> far more sense to locate a community center where there are already other 
>> crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a cafe 
>> and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?  
>> 
>> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote for 
>> “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I plan 
>> to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already been 
>> characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what we 
>> already have at Bemis.
>> 
>> Please join me in rejecting the more expensive options 1 and 2 in order to 
>> redirect our efforts to take advantage of this moment in time to be far more 
>> creative, innovative and holistic in how we design and fund a Community 
>> Center that can also help transform Lincoln Station to its full potential as 
>> a truly vital, walkable village center.  Remember,
>> 
>>   we humans shape our environments at a moment in time, 
>> and then they shape us for decades to come.
>> 
>> Respectfully,
>> Ken Hurd
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>> .
>> Browse the 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Robert Hicks
point well made

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:03 AM Robert Ahlert  wrote:

> Agreed, great idea!
>
> Only option E would allow community center at the Mall
>
> Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.
>
> Rob
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:
>
>> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
>> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>>
>> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town
>> meeting.
>>
>> --
>> Bob Hicks
>> rchi...@gmail.com
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>>

-- 
Bob Hicks
rchi...@gmail.com
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Robert Ahlert
Agreed, great idea!

Only option E would allow community center at the Mall

Else, RLF will sell to the highest bidder under HCA zoning for housing.

Rob

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:57 AM Robert Hicks  wrote:

> I too support Ken Hurd's recommendation that the Community Center be
> included as part of the redevelopment of the Lincoln Station area.
>
> Please write in - "None of the Above" on the article at the Special Town
> meeting.
>
> --
> Bob Hicks
> rchi...@gmail.com
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Jane Appell
Ken, 

You make a great point. The community center and housing zoning came up at 
different times as separate issues. But,  For good planning and to provide the 
most benefit to the town as we would like to see it, it makes sense to look at 
them both together while we have the chance. 

Jane


Jane Appell, Ph.D.
Sent from my iPad

> On Dec 1, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Ken Hurd  wrote:
> 
> Hello LincolnTalkers,
> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an 
> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind everyone 
> why I and many others believe we should not build a community center on the 
> school campus.  I still believe it should be located in Lincoln Station, 
> particularly now that our small commercial area is in play because of the 
> Housing Choice Act.
> 
> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it has 
> long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be 
> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For 
> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long Range 
> Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was overwhelmingly one 
> of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and in serious need of a 
> catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the compact, vital, walkable 
> village center that was a stated goal at the time.  A community center in 
> such a location would be the equivalent of an anchor store in a retail 
> setting, and by virtue of attracting more people on a regular basis, it would 
> create more opportunities for a clustered cross-current of activities 
> spawning greater social interaction."  
> 
> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern 
> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better 
> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of 
> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced 
> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required accessory 
> use in the development of a future residential project at Lincoln Station?   
> 
> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to guide 
> the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in realizing a 
> good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would be a plus to any 
> potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant (assuming COA 
> long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely designed ground 
> level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to Lincoln upfront 
> financing for design and construction, replace public project inefficiencies 
> with professional development expertise, and as such the new Community Center 
> facility may be more affordable to the town's stressed taxpayers."
> 
> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic 
> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the 
> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition, 
> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational 
> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there weren’t 
> a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t it make 
> far more sense to locate a community center where there are already other 
> crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a cafe and 
> restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?  
> 
> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote for 
> “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I plan 
> to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project cost) that has already been 
> characterized as not sufficient to provide services comparable to what we 
> already have at Bemis.
> 
> Please join me in rejecting the more expensive options 1 and 2 in order to 
> redirect our efforts to take advantage of this moment in time to be far more 
> creative, innovative and holistic in how we design and fund a Community 
> Center that can also help transform Lincoln Station to its full potential as 
> a truly vital, walkable village center.  Remember,
> 
>   we humans shape our environments at a moment in time, 
> and then they shape us for decades to come.
> 
> Respectfully,
> Ken Hurd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center

2023-12-01 Thread Peter Buchthal
I do hope there is a motion on the floor to add an additional choice of
"None of the Above" to the three choices of the Community Center.

I am not an architect, nor a builder, but I think I have some common
sense. The average  square footage being added to the Hartwell Campus for
the three Community Center choices is  15,933 square feet.  How many people
do we expect to visit the Community Center at any one time?  In order for
it to be fully used, not a white elephant, let's just say I hope we are
building the Community Center to host 50 to 100 people during many days and
times.

Where do we expect everyone to park?  We have approximately 50 spaces near
the new Community Center and they are well taken at many times of the day,
especially during drop off and pickup of Magic Gardens, after school,
pickup from Leap, and when any activity occurs at the main Hartwell
building that houses a new training facility for the School District and
the Hartwell Multi purpose room.  I believe the new community center (not
including Leap) will only be used from 9AM to 2PM for safety reasons to
avoid little children running in the parking lot.

In all three options being proposed for the community center, we are adding
only 13 spots along Ballfield road.  Where will everyone park?

I support the suggestion to move a new community center to the revitalized
Lincoln Mall.  Those 50 to 100 people who visit the community center at one
time will be great anchor users of Twisted Tree, Donelans, the Tack room
and other retailers who we claim to want to support.

Peter Buchthal
Weston Rd

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 7:54 AM Ken Hurd  wrote:

> Hello LincolnTalkers,
> With apologies for expressing yet again my strongly held opinion as an
> architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, I want to remind
> everyone why I and many others believe we should not build a community
> center on the school campus.  I still believe it should be located in
> Lincoln Station, particularly now that our small commercial area is in play
> because of the Housing Choice Act.
>
> As I wrote last year, "I fully support building a new facility, but it
> has long been my opinion that such a major investment by the town should be
> deployed where it is most needed - namely in the Lincoln Station area.  For
> more than ten years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long
> Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was
> overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and
> in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the
> compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the
> time.  A community center in such a location would be the equivalent of an
> anchor store in a retail setting, and by virtue of attracting more people
> on a regular basis, it would create more opportunities for a clustered
> cross-current of activities spawning greater social interaction."
>
> As many will recall at last year’s Town Meeting, there was serious concern
> about the cost to build it, and I am of the opinion that there are better
> ways to accomplish this than spending anywhere from $18 to $24 million of
> taxpayer money to do so.  As was recently suggested to me by an experienced
> urban planner, why not include the Community Center as a required
> accessory use in the development of a future residential project at
> Lincoln Station?
>
> As he said, “With clear program requirements and project parameters to
> guide the design of a new project, developers can be very efficient in
> realizing a good project on time and within budget.” Moreover, “It would
> be a plus to any potential developer's proforma to have a confirmed tenant
> (assuming COA long-term lease) for … an active community use in purposely
> designed ground level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to
> Lincoln upfront financing for design and construction, replace public
> project inefficiencies with professional development expertise, and as such
> the new Community Center facility may be more affordable to the town's
> stressed taxpayers."
>
> As I also wrote last year, I believe  it would constitute the classic
> suburban planning error to create a new facility that stands alone at the
> school and, like the suburban mall, accessible only by car.  In addition,
> because of school protocols, there would be very limited inter-generational
> co-mingling until after school hours, if at all.  And, even if there
> weren’t a greater  awareness about the effects of climate change, wouldn’t
> it make far more sense to locate a community center where there are already
> other crucial services such as the post office, grocery store, cleaners, a
> cafe and restaurant, not to mention the potential for more housing?
>
> Earlier this week I wrote the Selects about including an option to vote
> for “None of the Above” at tomorrow’s Town Meeting.  Absent any response, I
> plan to vote for Option 3 ($12.5 million project 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Carol Ryan
For an example: a men’s group meet at The Middlebury Coop in Vermont every Thursday morning. Their meet up has gone on for 25 years. All it takes is a little communication . Put the word out. Meet up at Twisted Tree… pick a day and time. We established The Lincoln Art and Farmer’s Market this season just by showing up at the same time and place .Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 10, 2023, at 3:03 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:But would you go to Twisted Tree or Decordova by yourself to hang out and perhaps run into someone? Personally, I would go to these places to meet up with a friend I had made a plan to see, not to go by myself.I am trying to respond to the US Surgeon General's 2023 report that states there is an epidemic of isolation and loneliness in this country because so many people are living alone.  They further suggest that local communities find ways to help people connect with others. I think a Community Building designed in the right way could provide a space that invites this connection, a space that other spaces in town don't provide. Where is the Coffee Spot in the library and how many people could it accommodate? I'm just not aware of this. Thanks.On Tue, Oct 10, 2023, 2:39 PM Carol Ryan  wrote:Yes just checked in with Melissa the head librarian . Covered drinks and food is allowed in every space except the computer area and historic archives. If a cafe is where people want to meet why not go to Twisted Tree or Decordova. You might actually bump into a friend or two from another town. I doubt this will happen at a community center on the school property.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 10, 2023, at 2:18 PM, ٍSarah Postlethwait  wrote:According to the Library code of conduct, they have a designated coffee area already and food and drinks are permitted in certain parts of the building. 路‍♀️<5237375E-BAED-4C39-B8CC-EDF21140C6DF.jpeg>On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:03 PM sally kindleberger  wrote:But eating food in the library is not encouraged- so no coffee/goodies!On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:…and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and talk.I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.
———Sara Mattes


On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with books, music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian about the library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it so we don’t lose it.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  wrote:Hi Carol,I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.Linda McMillanOn Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! Lovely gathering spot outside as well.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting with folks. It’s for reading.On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.…just a few examples.…just a reality check.Sent from my iPadOn Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Sara Mattes
I have gone by myself, and not just once-grabbed a cup of coffee, sat down and 
enjoyed it.
That’s just me.

I would feel odd driving to a building and sitting in a lounge.
It would feel like a hotel, or an airport, of a hospital waiting area…to me.

…just one person’s take on it.



--
Sara Mattes




> On Oct 10, 2023, at 3:07 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:
> 
> But would you go to Twisted Tree or Decordova by yourself to hang out and 
> perhaps run into someone? Personally, I would go to these places to meet up 
> with a friend I had made a plan to see, not to go by myself.
> 
> I am trying to respond to the US Surgeon General's 2023 report that states 
> there is an epidemic of isolation and loneliness in this country because so 
> many people are living alone.  They further suggest that local communities 
> find ways to help people connect with others. I think a Community Building 
> designed in the right way could provide a space that invites this connection, 
> a space that other spaces in town don't provide. Where is the Coffee Spot in 
> the library and how many people could it accommodate? I'm just not aware of 
> this. Thanks.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023, 2:39 PM Carol Ryan  > wrote:
>> Yes just checked in with Melissa the head librarian . Covered drinks and 
>> food is allowed in every space except the computer area and historic 
>> archives. If a cafe is where people want to meet why not go to Twisted Tree 
>> or Decordova. You might actually bump into a friend or two from another 
>> town. I doubt this will happen at a community center on the school property.
>> Carol Ryan
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 2:18 PM, ٍSarah Postlethwait >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> According to the Library code of conduct, they have a designated coffee 
>>> area already and food and drinks are permitted in certain parts of the 
>>> building. 路‍♀️
>>> <5237375E-BAED-4C39-B8CC-EDF21140C6DF.jpeg>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:03 PM sally kindleberger >> > wrote:
 But eating food in the library is not encouraged- so no coffee/goodies!
 
 
 On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sara Mattes >>> > wrote:
> …and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and 
> talk.
> I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.
> 
> 
> ———
> 
> Sara Mattes
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan > > wrote:
>> 
>> I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. 
>> Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with 
>> their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I 
>> have never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated 
>> quiet room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on 
>> hot days and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with 
>> natural light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is 
>> filled with books, music and there are computers for people to use.There 
>> is a gallery at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to 
>> know the librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the 
>> head librarian about the library’s quest to encourage more people to 
>> come by. Let’s use it so we don’t lose it.
>> 
>> Carol Ryan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Carol,
>>> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the 
>>> need of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a 
>>> bit and socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from 
>>> seeing people on a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes 
>>> lots of people to show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to 
>>> “an event”. I think a Community Building would serve this unique need, 
>>> in my opinion.
>>> 
>>> Linda McMillan
>>> 
 On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan >>> > wrote:
 
 There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
 designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet 
 with friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room 
 for free! Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
 
 Carol Ryan
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  > wrote:
> 
> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and 
> chatting with folks. It’s for reading.

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Linda McMillan
But would you go to Twisted Tree or Decordova by yourself to hang out and
perhaps run into someone? Personally, I would go to these places to meet up
with a friend I had made a plan to see, not to go by myself.

I am trying to respond to the US Surgeon General's 2023 report that states
there is an epidemic of isolation and loneliness in this country because so
many people are living alone.  They further suggest that local communities
find ways to help people connect with others. I think a Community Building
designed in the right way could provide a space that invites this
connection, a space that other spaces in town don't provide. Where is the
Coffee Spot in the library and how many people could it accommodate? I'm
just not aware of this. Thanks.

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023, 2:39 PM Carol Ryan  wrote:

> Yes just checked in with Melissa the head librarian . Covered drinks and
> food is allowed in every space except the computer area and historic
> archives. If a cafe is where people want to meet why not go to Twisted Tree
> or Decordova. You might actually bump into a friend or two from another
> town. I doubt this will happen at a community center on the school property.
> Carol Ryan
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 10, 2023, at 2:18 PM, ٍSarah Postlethwait  wrote:
>
> 
> According to the Library code of conduct, they have a designated coffee
> area already and food and drinks are permitted in certain parts of the
> building. 路‍♀️
> <5237375E-BAED-4C39-B8CC-EDF21140C6DF.jpeg>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:03 PM sally kindleberger <
> skindleber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> But eating food in the library is not encouraged- so no coffee/goodies!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:
>>
>>> …and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and
>>> talk.
>>> I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.
>>>
>>>
>>> ———
>>>
>>> Sara Mattes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>>>
>>> I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there.
>>> Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with
>>> their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have
>>> never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet
>>> room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days
>>> and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural
>>> light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with
>>> books, music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery
>>> at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the
>>> librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian
>>> about the library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it
>>> so we don’t lose it.
>>>
>>> Carol Ryan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Carol,
>>> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need
>>> of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and
>>> socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on
>>> a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to
>>> show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a
>>> Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Linda McMillan
>>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>>>
>>> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are
>>> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with
>>> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free!
>>> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
>>>
>>> Carol Ryan
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting
>>> with folks. It’s for reading.
>>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell
>>> CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>>>
>>> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce
>>> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and
>>> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
>>> …just a few examples.
>>>
>>>
>>> …just a reality check.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at
>>> 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I
>>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to
>>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman
>>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!),

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Sara Mattes
…and, we have been encouraged to support the Mall.
There, you can get/bring coffee and sit in the various outdoor spots.
There is also “drop-in” at both Twisted Tree and Tack Room.
I see folks who sit in Twisted Tree for hours…also folks with young kids in the 
AM.
I have often been walking to Donelan’s or the bank and see someone I know and 
join them.
Do people really envision themselves going  to sit in a lobby of a building, 
just to hang out?

I suspect that is not what most are yearning for.

———
Sara Mattes




> On Oct 10, 2023, at 2:18 PM, ٍSarah Postlethwait  wrote:
> 
> According to the Library code of conduct, they have a designated coffee area 
> already and food and drinks are permitted in certain parts of the building. 
> 路‍♀️
> <5237375E-BAED-4C39-B8CC-EDF21140C6DF.jpeg>
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:03 PM sally kindleberger  > wrote:
>> But eating food in the library is not encouraged- so no coffee/goodies!
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sara Mattes > > wrote:
>>> …and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and 
>>> talk.
>>> I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ———
>>> 
>>> Sara Mattes
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan >>> > wrote:
 
 I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. 
 Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with 
 their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have 
 never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet 
 room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot 
 days and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural 
 light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with 
 books, music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery 
 at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the 
 librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian 
 about the library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use 
 it so we don’t lose it.
 
 Carol Ryan
 
 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  > wrote:
> 
> Hi Carol,
> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need 
> of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit 
> and socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing 
> people on a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of 
> people to show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. 
> I think a Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
> 
> Linda McMillan
> 
>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan > > wrote:
>> 
>> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
>> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet 
>> with friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room 
>> for free! Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
>> 
>> Carol Ryan
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting 
>>> with folks. It’s for reading.
>>> 
 On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes >>> > wrote:
 
 What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell 
 CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
 
 We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at 
 Pierce House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the 
 Library, and sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), 
 and Winter Carnival.
 …just a few examples.
 
 
 …just a reality check.
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  > wrote:
> 
> 
> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived 
> at 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 
> 75), but I bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on 
> the terrace to mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, 
> active children. A woman with a lovely little daughter said she'd met 
> me at the dump (how Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we 
> had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in 
> the '90's). We both had 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Carol Ryan
Yes just checked in with Melissa the head librarian . Covered drinks and food is allowed in every space except the computer area and historic archives. If a cafe is where people want to meet why not go to Twisted Tree or Decordova. You might actually bump into a friend or two from another town. I doubt this will happen at a community center on the school property.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 10, 2023, at 2:18 PM, ٍSarah Postlethwait  wrote:According to the Library code of conduct, they have a designated coffee area already and food and drinks are permitted in certain parts of the building. 路‍♀️<5237375E-BAED-4C39-B8CC-EDF21140C6DF.jpeg>On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:03 PM sally kindleberger  wrote:But eating food in the library is not encouraged- so no coffee/goodies!On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:…and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and talk.I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.
———Sara Mattes


On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with books, music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian about the library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it so we don’t lose it.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  wrote:Hi Carol,I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.Linda McMillanOn Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! Lovely gathering spot outside as well.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting with folks. It’s for reading.On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.…just a few examples.…just a reality check.Sent from my iPadOn Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get together for coffee in the future.I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree DeCordova last night. I haven't related to 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Carol Ryan
I am pretty sure you can have coffee and a (byo) pastry downstairs or in the Tarbell room. Let’s ask the librarians . Maybe they would encourage and or provide this for a small fee.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 10, 2023, at 2:03 PM, sally kindleberger  wrote:But eating food in the library is not encouraged- so no coffee/goodies!On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:…and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and talk.I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.
———Sara Mattes


On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with books, music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian about the library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it so we don’t lose it.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  wrote:Hi Carol,I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.Linda McMillanOn Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! Lovely gathering spot outside as well.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting with folks. It’s for reading.On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.…just a few examples.…just a reality check.Sent from my iPadOn Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get together for coffee in the future.I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread sally kindleberger
But eating food in the library is not encouraged- so no coffee/goodies!


On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:

> …and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and
> talk.
> I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.
>
>
> ———
>
> Sara Mattes
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>
> I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there.
> Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with
> their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have
> never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet
> room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days
> and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural
> light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with
> books, music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery
> at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the
> librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian
> about the library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it
> so we don’t lose it.
>
> Carol Ryan
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Carol,
> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need
> of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and
> socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on
> a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to
> show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a
> Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
>
> Linda McMillan
>
> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>
> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are
> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with
> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free!
> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
>
> Carol Ryan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan 
> wrote:
>
> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting
> with folks. It’s for reading.
>
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC,
> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
>
>
> …just a reality check.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>
> 
> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6
> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I
> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to
> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman
> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!),
> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in
> the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in
> California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She
> told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living
> in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get
> together for coffee in the future.
>
> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and
> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age,
> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was
> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into
> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until
> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged
> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>
> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to
> meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree
> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of
> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I
> enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Sara Mattes
…and, one can always sit in the “tower room” near the Reference Desk and talk.
I meet/see /talk to people there,  fairly regularly.


———
Sara Mattes




> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
> 
> I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. Other 
> times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with their 
> children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have never 
> been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet room. The 
> library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days and warm on 
> cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural light, views to 
> look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with books, music and 
> there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery at the Library. They 
> even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the librarians . A few years ago we 
> had a conversation with the head librarian about the library’s quest to 
> encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it so we don’t lose it.
> 
> Carol Ryan
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Carol,
>> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of 
>> those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and 
>> socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on a 
>> day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to show 
>> up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a 
>> Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
>> 
>> Linda McMillan
>> 
>>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>>> 
>>> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
>>> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with 
>>> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! 
>>> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
>>> 
>>> Carol Ryan
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
 On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  
 wrote:
 
 At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting 
 with folks. It’s for reading.
 
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
> 
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell 
> CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
> 
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter 
> Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
> 
> 
> …just a reality check.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 
>> 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but 
>> I bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace 
>> to mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A 
>> woman with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how 
>> Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in 
>> Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had 
>> lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to 
>> Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed how we found 
>> Lincoln after living in California. She asked me for my contact info and 
>> we agreed to get together for coffee in the future.
>> 
>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, 
>> and struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my 
>> age, who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while 
>> I was there, they in the company of their family and small children). He 
>> was into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated 
>> conversation until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the 
>> morning. We exchanged info about where we lived and they invited me to 
>> stop by.
>> 
>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to 
>> meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted 
>> Tree DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned 
>> notion of intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, 
>> but I enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread ٍSarah Postlethwait
We have a variety of places for unstructured spur of the moment meeting
spaces.
•The library
•Decordova museum and cafe- free admission for Lincoln residents!
•Codman farm grocery store
•twisted tree
•the tack room
•Drumlin Farm
•3 playgrounds at the school


If these places that offer more than just an empty room with chairs are not
exceeding their capacity- why do we think that a 25 million dollar
community center would draw people in just to hang out? And If we do think
a community center would attract residents- wouldn’t that also make these
other meeting places lose business?

Building a community center for the purpose of a cozy gathering space at
the cost of a $725 a year tax increase for the median 1.2 million dollar
home in Lincoln seems to be a very fiscally irresponsible choice on many
levels.

Take that money and spend it at a local business instead…
you could meet a friend at twisted tree and spend $14 on coffee and a
sandwich once a week for a year for the same price…
 or get a $30 meal twice a month at the tack room…
 or visit the library every day and still have $725 a year in your pocket.

How about we donate a Keurig to the library and save ourselves $25 million
dollars? Sounds like a win / win!



On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:10 PM Linda McMillan 
wrote:

> I’d be interested to hear from others if they think the library is a good
> substitute for a community gathering space in a new Community Center. In
> other words, is the town’s need for a cozy, comfortable, spur-of-the-moment
> gathering space already met because they can use the library? Or, would
> such a space in a new Community Center fill a void?
>
> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>
> I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there.
> Other times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with
> their children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have
> never been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet
> room. The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days
> and warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural
> light, views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with
> books, music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery
> at the Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the
> librarians . A few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian
> about the library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it
> so we don’t lose it.
>
> Carol Ryan
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Carol,
> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need
> of those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and
> socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on
> a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to
> show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a
> Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
>
> Linda McMillan
>
> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>
> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are
> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with
> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free!
> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
>
> Carol Ryan
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan 
> wrote:
>
> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting
> with folks. It’s for reading.
>
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC,
> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
>
>
> …just a reality check.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>
> 
> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6
> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I
> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to
> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman
> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!),
> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in
> the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in
> California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She
> told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living
> in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get
> together for coffee in the future.
>
> I went into the 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Carol Ryan
I am not suggesting that the library meets all the criteria that a
new building might provide. I just wonder if we consider what the town already 
has if the new build may perhaps find some compromises and be designed to 
provide just what the town actually needs .
Thanks, Carol Ryan

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 10, 2023, at 12:10 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:
> 
> I’d be interested to hear from others if they think the library is a good 
> substitute for a community gathering space in a new Community Center. In 
> other words, is the town’s need for a cozy, comfortable, spur-of-the-moment 
> gathering space already met because they can use the library? Or, would such 
> a space in a new Community Center fill a void?
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>> 
>> I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. Other 
>> times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with their 
>> children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have never 
>> been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet room. 
>> The library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days and 
>> warm on cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural light, 
>> views to look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with books, 
>> music and there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery at the 
>> Library. They even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the librarians . A 
>> few years ago we had a conversation with the head librarian about the 
>> library’s quest to encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it so we 
>> don’t lose it.
>> 
>> Carol Ryan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
 On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  
 wrote:
 
>>> Hi Carol,
>>> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of 
>>> those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and 
>>> socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on 
>>> a day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to 
>>> show up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a 
>>> Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
>>> 
>>> Linda McMillan
>>> 
 On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
 
 There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
 designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with 
 friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! 
 Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
 
 Carol Ryan
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  
>> wrote:
>> 
> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting 
> with folks. It’s for reading.
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>> 
>> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell 
>> CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>> 
>> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
>> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
>> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter 
>> Carnival.
>> …just a few examples.
>> 
>> 
>> …just a reality check.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
 On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
 
>>> 
>>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived 
>>> at 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), 
>>> but I bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the 
>>> terrace to mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active 
>>> children. A woman with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at 
>>> the dump (how Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both 
>>> grown up in Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the 
>>> '90's). We both had lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and 
>>> ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me about her work and we 
>>> discussed how we found Lincoln after living in California. She asked me 
>>> for my contact info and we agreed to get together for coffee in the 
>>> future.
>>> 
>>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, 
>>> and struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less 
>>> my age, who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw 
>>> while I was there, they in the company of their family and small 
>>> children). He was into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an 
>>> animated conversation until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a 
>>> trip in the morning. We exchanged info about where we lived and they 
>>> invited me to stop by.
>>> 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Linda McMillan
I’d be interested to hear from others if they think the library is a good 
substitute for a community gathering space in a new Community Center. In other 
words, is the town’s need for a cozy, comfortable, spur-of-the-moment gathering 
space already met because they can use the library? Or, would such a space in a 
new Community Center fill a void?

> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
> 
> I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. Other 
> times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with their 
> children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have never 
> been told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet room. The 
> library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days and warm on 
> cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural light, views to 
> look outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with books, music and 
> there are computers for people to use.There is a gallery at the Library. They 
> even have coffee. I enjoy getting to know the librarians . A few years ago we 
> had a conversation with the head librarian about the library’s quest to 
> encourage more people to come by. Let’s use it so we don’t lose it.
> 
> Carol Ryan
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Carol,
>> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of 
>> those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and 
>> socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on a 
>> day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to show 
>> up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a 
>> Community Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
>> 
>> Linda McMillan
>> 
>>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>>> 
>>> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
>>> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with 
>>> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! 
>>> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
>>> 
>>> Carol Ryan
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
 On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  
 wrote:
 
 At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting 
 with folks. It’s for reading.
 
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
> 
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell 
> CC, between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
> 
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter 
> Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
> 
> 
> …just a reality check.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 
>> 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but 
>> I bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace 
>> to mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A 
>> woman with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how 
>> Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in 
>> Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had 
>> lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to 
>> Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed how we found 
>> Lincoln after living in California. She asked me for my contact info and 
>> we agreed to get together for coffee in the future.
>> 
>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, 
>> and struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my 
>> age, who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while 
>> I was there, they in the company of their family and small children). He 
>> was into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated 
>> conversation until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the 
>> morning. We exchanged info about where we lived and they invited me to 
>> stop by.
>> 
>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to 
>> meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted 
>> Tree DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned 
>> notion of intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, 
>> but I enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Carol Ryan
I drop by the library often . Sometimes I plan to meet friends there. Other 
times I see people unexpectedly. I see friends and neighbors with their 
children. In my opinion the library is one of our town hubs. I have never been 
told to be quiet at the library. There is one designated quiet room. The 
library is open for many hours every week. It is cool on hot days and warm on 
cold days. It is a beautiful building filled with natural light, views to look 
outside and comfortable seating. It is filled with books, music and there are 
computers for people to use.There is a gallery at the Library. They even have 
coffee. I enjoy getting to know the librarians . A few years ago we had a 
conversation with the head librarian about the library’s quest to encourage 
more people to come by. Let’s use it so we don’t lose it.

Carol Ryan



Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 10, 2023, at 11:21 AM, Linda McMillan  wrote:
> 
> Hi Carol,
> I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of 
> those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and 
> socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on a 
> day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to show 
> up. Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a Community 
> Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.
> 
> Linda McMillan
> 
>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
>> 
>> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
>> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with 
>> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! 
>> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
>> 
>> Carol Ryan
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
 On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  
 wrote:
 
>>> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting 
>>> with folks. It’s for reading.
>>> 
 On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
 
 What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
 between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
 
 We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
 House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
 sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter 
 Carnival.
 …just a few examples.
 
 
 …just a reality check.
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>> 
> 
> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 
> 6 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A 
> woman with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how 
> Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in 
> Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had 
> lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to 
> Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln 
> after living in California. She asked me for my contact info and we 
> agreed to get together for coffee in the future.
> 
> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, 
> and struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my 
> age, who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I 
> was there, they in the company of their family and small children). He 
> was into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated 
> conversation until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the 
> morning. We exchanged info about where we lived and they invited me to 
> stop by.
> 
> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to 
> meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted 
> Tree DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned 
> notion of intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, 
> but I enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
 -- 
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at 
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread Linda McMillan
Hi Carol,
I love our library, but reserving the Tarbell Room doesn’t meet the need of 
those who just want to drop in and see who is there, hang out a bit and 
socialize. Plus, going to an event is very different from seeing people on a 
day-to-day basis without a special event that causes lots of people to show up. 
Sometimes, folks don’t feel like going to “an event”. I think a Community 
Building would serve this unique need, in my opinion.

Linda McMillan

> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
> 
> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with 
> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! 
> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
> 
> Carol Ryan
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:
>> 
>> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting with 
>> folks. It’s for reading.
>> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>>> 
>>> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
>>> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>>> 
>>> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
>>> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
>>> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
>>> …just a few examples.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> …just a reality check.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
 On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
 
 
 The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
 bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
 mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
 with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how 
 Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in 
 Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had 
 lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to 
 Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln 
 after living in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed 
 to get together for coffee in the future.
 
 I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
 struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
 who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
 there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was 
 into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation 
 until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We 
 exchanged info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
 
 When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to 
 meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted 
 Tree DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion 
 of intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I 
 enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
 -- 
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at 
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
 
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-10 Thread kathryn Corbin
Exactly, Linda. 
And exactly my experience vis-a-vis living alone now.
Kathryn 

Sent from my iPhone
Please excuse any typos,
(which I declare are exclusively the fault of auto spell-check!)

> On Oct 9, 2023, at 8:35 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
> 
> There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are 
> designated as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with 
> friends or bump into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! 
> Lovely gathering spot outside as well.
> 
> Carol Ryan
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>>> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:
>>> 
>> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting with 
>> folks. It’s for reading.
>> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>>> 
>>> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
>>> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>>> 
>>> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
>>> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
>>> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
>>> …just a few examples.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> …just a reality check.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
> 
 
 The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
 and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
 bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
 mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
 with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how 
 Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in 
 Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had 
 lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to 
 Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln 
 after living in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed 
 to get together for coffee in the future.
 
 I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
 struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
 who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
 there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was 
 into the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation 
 until I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We 
 exchanged info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
 
 When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to 
 meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted 
 Tree DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion 
 of intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I 
 enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
 --
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
 Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at 
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
 
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-09 Thread Carol Ryan
There are many different spaces at our wonderful library . Some are designated 
as quiet space others are not. It’s a great place to meet with friends or bump 
into neighbors. You can reserve the Tarbell Room for free! Lovely gathering 
spot outside as well.

Carol Ryan

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 9, 2023, at 5:01 PM, Linda McMillan  wrote:
> 
> At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting with 
> folks. It’s for reading.
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>> 
>> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
>> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>> 
>> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
>> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
>> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
>> …just a few examples.
>> 
>> 
>> …just a reality check.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
 On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
 
>>> 
>>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
>>> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
>>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
>>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
>>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
>>> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in 
>>> the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in 
>>> California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She 
>>> told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living 
>>> in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get 
>>> together for coffee in the future.
>>> 
>>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
>>> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
>>> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
>>> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into 
>>> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until 
>>> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged 
>>> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>>> 
>>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
>>> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
>>> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
>>> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I 
>>> enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-09 Thread Linda McMillan
At the library, you are supposed to be quiet, not talking and chatting with 
folks. It’s for reading.

> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
> 
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
> 
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
> 
> 
> …just a reality check.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
>> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
>> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the 
>> '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in California 
>> when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me 
>> about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living in 
>> California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get together 
>> for coffee in the future.
>> 
>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
>> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
>> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
>> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into 
>> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until 
>> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged 
>> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>> 
>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
>> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
>> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
>> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I enjoyed 
>> last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-09 Thread Bob Kupperstein
Doesn't the town library serve that function?  It certainly has the comfy
and cozy chairs and human beings.

-Bob

On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:32 PM Linda McMillan 
wrote:

> This is why a “community gathering” space is so important in a new
> Community Center. I was happy to see that in all the options, there is now
> a space that is labeled “community gathering” because not everyone wants to
> sign up for an exercise program, learn a new language, or join a specific
> program. Many people just want to see another human being, especially if
> they live alone. A space with cozy and comfortable chairs that facilitates
> this is sorely needed in Lincoln.
>
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC,
> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
>
>
> …just a reality check.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>
> 
> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6
> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I
> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to
> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman
> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!),
> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in
> the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in
> California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She
> told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living
> in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get
> together for coffee in the future.
>
> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and
> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age,
> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was
> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into
> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until
> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged
> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>
> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to
> meet people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree
> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of
> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I
> enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-09 Thread Linda McMillan
This is why a “community gathering” space is so important in a new Community 
Center. I was happy to see that in all the options, there is now a space that 
is labeled “community gathering” because not everyone wants to sign up for an 
exercise program, learn a new language, or join a specific program. Many people 
just want to see another human being, especially if they live alone. A space 
with cozy and comfortable chairs that facilitates this is sorely needed in 
Lincoln.

> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
> 
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
> 
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
> 
> 
> …just a reality check.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
>> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
>> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the 
>> '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in California 
>> when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me 
>> about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living in 
>> California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get together 
>> for coffee in the future.
>> 
>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
>> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
>> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
>> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into 
>> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until 
>> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged 
>> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>> 
>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
>> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
>> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
>> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I enjoyed 
>> last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-09 Thread Anne Sobol
Ruth Ann, that was certainly not my point!

First off, I was writing to describe a pleasant social occasion in hopes of 
encouraging Twisted Tree and DeCordova to repeat such an opportunity. I also 
hoped that people my age who read the post would think it sounded like fun & 
might come to another such evening event.

In addition I was trying to say that when I have heard people talk about 
opportunities for intergenerational contact as something to be gained from 
co-locating COA and programs for kids in what is being proposed at Hartwell, I 
haven’t been able to imagine what they were talking about.

Huhm, I’d be down there in the community space at new Comm Center Hartwell 
hoping to bump into someone to talk to and young people would be picking up 
their kids after work/school, heading home for dinner & family time, and they’d
stop & talk with this older woman lurking in the hall? I doubt it.

The was something relaxed & convivial about what happened at Twisted Tree 
DeCordova. Was it that alcohol was an option? I didn’t have an alcoholic drink, 
but others did. The event took place after work, early evening, kids invited, a 
facility that engages the kids, parents keeping an eye on them, but not 
required to be overly involved, drinks, deliberately going out somewhere for 
purpose of making contact.

I went hoping to hang out with some people more or less my own age who had 
chosen to go out in the early evening to connect. Didn’t really find them there 
but maybe by describing my positive experience others would be encouraged to 
come another time. And I was happily surprised to find myself enjoying an 
intergenerational occasion.

I go to lots of Lincoln events including at COA. I’m a widow & new in town, I’m 
hoping to make friends. Pricked by your response, I’ll try to go to more! I 
hope this is clarifying!

> On Oct 9, 2023, at 12:04 PM, RAandBOB  wrote:
> 
> So, just a reality check. Your point is that none of the people you would 
> meet at COAHS would be an interesting person worth talking to.
> 
> Ruth Ann
> (She, her, hers)
> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>>> 
>> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
>> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>> 
>> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
>> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
>> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
>> …just a few examples.
>> 
>> 
>> …just a reality check.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
 On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
 
>>> 
>>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
>>> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
>>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
>>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
>>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
>>> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in 
>>> the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in 
>>> California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She 
>>> told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living 
>>> in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get 
>>> together for coffee in the future.
>>> 
>>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
>>> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
>>> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
>>> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into 
>>> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until 
>>> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged 
>>> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>>> 
>>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
>>> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
>>> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
>>> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I 
>>> enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-09 Thread Sara Mattes
Hardly…my point was that the folks specifically mentioned, the you parents, 
that were so interesting, were met at a community event.

I am trying to point out that it is the community EVENTS where we are most 
likely to have those enriching intergenerational interactions…Codman Farm Feast 
being the most recent.

While the CC may offer many things, the opportunities for the activity cited 
most likely will NOT be one of them.

We do need more casual, social and intergenerational events.

Let’s work with DeCordova, Codman, Pierce House and the Celebrations Committee 
to host more!

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 9, 2023, at 12:04 PM, RAandBOB  wrote:
> 
> So, just a reality check. Your point is that none of the people you would 
> meet at COAHS would be an interesting person worth talking to.
> 
> Ruth Ann
> (She, her, hers)
> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
>>> 
>> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
>> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
>> 
>> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
>> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
>> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
>> …just a few examples.
>> 
>> 
>> …just a reality check.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
 On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
 
>>> 
>>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
>>> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
>>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
>>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
>>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
>>> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in 
>>> the '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in 
>>> California when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She 
>>> told me about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living 
>>> in California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get 
>>> together for coffee in the future.
>>> 
>>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
>>> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
>>> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
>>> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into 
>>> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until 
>>> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged 
>>> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>>> 
>>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
>>> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
>>> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
>>> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I 
>>> enjoyed last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-09 Thread RAandBOB
So, just a reality check. Your point is that none of the people you would meet 
at COAHS would be an interesting person worth talking to.

Ruth Ann
(She, her, hers)

> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
> 
> What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
> 
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
> 
> 
> …just a reality check.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
>> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
>> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the 
>> '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in California 
>> when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me 
>> about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living in 
>> California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get together 
>> for coffee in the future.
>> 
>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
>> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
>> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
>> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into 
>> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until 
>> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged 
>> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>> 
>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
>> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
>> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
>> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I enjoyed 
>> last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-07 Thread Sara Mattes
Yes!

We need an Community Calendar to better communicate the array of events offered 
across the various organizations and institutions within town…and then one that 
includes activities and events in nearby towns.,
But, first, let’s get notification of all Lincoln events all in one place.
Perhaps it could be an activity for a Senior Work-off spot- someone who 
collates and  regularly posts on LincolnTalk and in The Squirrel, with a 
dedicated webpage to check.
I bet we might be surprised to see all the things available, for all ages, 
right here in town!

--
Sara Mattes




> On Oct 7, 2023, at 2:06 PM, melinda bruno-smith  
> wrote:
> 
> Also— Lincoln Garden Club with 146 members and First Parish…
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> Melinda Bruno-Smith
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:
> 
>  What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
> between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?
> 
> We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce 
> House ( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and 
> sometimes at events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
> …just a few examples.
> 
> 
> …just a reality check.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
>> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
>> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
>> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
>> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
>> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the 
>> '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in California 
>> when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me 
>> about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living in 
>> California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get together 
>> for coffee in the future.
>> 
>> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
>> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, 
>> who were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was 
>> there, they in the company of their family and small children). He was into 
>> the Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until 
>> I felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged 
>> info about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
>> 
>> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
>> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
>> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
>> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I enjoyed 
>> last night mixing with younger people and their children.
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-07 Thread melinda bruno-smith
Also— Lincoln Garden Club with 146 members and First Parish…


Sent from my iPhone
Melinda Bruno-Smith




On Oct 7, 2023, at 11:43 AM, Sara Mattes  wrote:

 What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?

We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce House 
( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and sometimes at 
events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
…just a few examples.


…just a reality check.

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:


The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 and 
was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I bought an 
interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to mingle with the 
young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman with a lovely little 
daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), and we commenced to talk 
about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the '50's, she I think she said 
in the '90's). We both had lived in California when Covid hit in 2020, and 
ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me about her work and we discussed 
how we found Lincoln after living in California. She asked me for my contact 
info and we agreed to get together for coffee in the future.

I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, who 
were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was there, 
they in the company of their family and small children). He was into the 
Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until I felt 
I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged info about 
where we lived and they invited me to stop by.

When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I enjoyed 
last night mixing with younger people and their children.
--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center and Last night at Twisted Tree DeCordova

2023-10-07 Thread Sara Mattes
What is the likelihood you would meet any of these folks at a Hartwell CC, 
between the hours of 9:30 AM and 3:30 PM?

We meet at events like you have just described - at DeCordova, at Pierce House 
( First Day, 4 th of July), at Codman Farm, at the Library, and sometimes at 
events at the schools ( Town Meeting, eg), and Winter Carnival.
…just a few examples.


…just a reality check.

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 7, 2023, at 6:05 AM, Anne Sobol  wrote:
> 
> 
> The Twisted Tree at DeCordova was open last night from 5-9. I arrived at 6 
> and was disappointed not to see anyone in my age group (over 75), but I 
> bought an interesting non-alcoholic drink and went out on the terrace to 
> mingle with the young adults and their beautiful, active children. A woman 
> with a lovely little daughter said she'd met me at the dump (how Lincoln!), 
> and we commenced to talk about how we had both grown up in Lincoln (I in the 
> '50's, she I think she said in the '90's). We both had lived in California 
> when Covid hit in 2020, and ended up moving back to Lincoln. She told me 
> about her work and we discussed how we found Lincoln after living in 
> California. She asked me for my contact info and we agreed to get together 
> for coffee in the future.
> 
> I went into the shop to get a plastic cup for the remains of my drink, and 
> struck up conversation with a man and his wife, both more or less my age, who 
> were waiting in line (the only other people my age I saw while I was there, 
> they in the company of their family and small children). He was into the 
> Hanscom expansion opposition, and we had an animated conversation until I 
> felt I had to leave to get ready for a trip in the morning. We exchanged info 
> about where we lived and they invited me to stop by.
> 
> When people ask me what I want in a Community Center, I say a place to meet 
> people without a specific date. This is what I got at the Twisted Tree 
> DeCordova last night. I haven't related to the often-mentioned notion of 
> intergenerational mixing in the context of a Community Center, but I enjoyed 
> last night mixing with younger people and their children.
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-10-03 Thread Susanna Szeto
I cannot help but put my two cents in for this discussion.  I have been a dedicated teacher almost all my life in the City of Newton which is known for its quality of education.  After we have built such a state of the art school for our children in Lincoln, do we have to spend another 3.4 million to build another school for the after school program in town? Of course, one can always ask for more and more but is it absolutely necessarily and something the town cannot live without?  On Oct 2, 2023, at 10:18 PM, Karla Gravis  wrote:









The analysis that was shared earlier on LT about test scores was not in relation to LEAP. No one is trying to establish a relationship between LEAP and test scores.

The analysis that was shared was in relation to the assertion that we can only provide an equitable education if we have all this extra space.

Unfortunately, the tests scores show that even though we have more space per pupil than our neighbors, our high-needs students show less growth than the average of the state. Scores for our high-needs children have actually dropped more than the state average since we moved into the new school.  I have copied the relevant analysis below. Equitable education is very important, but it doesn’t seem like having all this extra space is helping us further that goal.

The analysis is not trying to show a tie between LEAP and academic achievement.

No one is suggesting we host LEAP off campus. What we are asking for is for a good faith effort to at least study the possibility of hosting LEAP in the school and consider lowering the tax burden for our town. We have a beautiful new school that sits empty in the afternoons. There should be a happy medium between 100% shared space and 5000 square feet of dedicated space in the school. It seems to me that with some ingenuity, we should be able to retain what makes LEAP special, at a far lesser cost than $3.4M. We are going to have to solve for this anyway if LEAP is going to reside in the school during construction. At the very least, we owe ourselves to study the possibility.

If Leap were in the school, the children would get easy access to the gym, art rooms, playgrounds, other school activities like the play and music classes, handicap-accessible restrooms and a modern HVAC system.

———-
Analysis previously shared:

Our high needs students exhibited average growth in the 43th percentile and 46th percentile for the State MCAS in ELA and Math respectively last school year, both unfortunately below the average for high needs students in the State. Actually, since we moved into our new school two years ago (one for elementary), high needs students MCAS scores at the Lincoln School have dropped 8pp in ELA and 2pp Math, 6pp worse than the average for high needs students in the State (-3pp in ELA, but +5pp in Math). It does not seem that this extra space is yielding an equitable education for all.


-- Forwarded message -From: Philana Mia Gnatowski <philana...@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 13:48Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerationsTo: Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com>CC: Listserv Listserv <lincoln@lincolntalk.org>Hello LT,I wanted to weigh in on this lively debate as both a former LEAP employee and as someone who grew up in Lincoln and chose to move back and raise her kids here. I believe that LEAP must remain in its own dedicated space on campus.In my experience as LEAP's middle school coordinator for 6 years, having our own building was extremely important for our day to day operations. Some have suggested that there is no overlap between the end of the school day and the beginning of LEAP's programming, but unless things have changed drastically, I do not believe this is the case. This is because the "start of day" for a LEAP teacher doesn't begin when the kids' school day ends. It starts with cleaning, set up and prep work for art projects or other activities. Having sufficient time and space to sit down with fellow teachers, without the children present, to discuss issues for the day is extremely important for both the quality of the programming and the staff's morale. It ensures that every staff member is on the same page and working as a cohesive unit to meet students' needs. From my understanding, the school building cannot accommodate this.Renting space off campus would drastically change the role LEAP plays facilitating students' other enrichment offerings. One of the many perks of being on the school campus is that LEAP staff also walk students to and from other after school activities. These kids don't have to miss out on gymnastics, theatre, tennis or music class. I remember my former boss saying to me that "we are very lucky to be able to rent a space on campus." Most private, non profit after school programs, like ours, don't operate on campus, requiring kids to be driven there. And once there, they stay there, until pick

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-10-02 Thread Karla Gravis
The analysis that was shared earlier on LT about test scores was not in
relation to LEAP. No one is trying to establish a relationship between LEAP
and test scores.


The analysis that was shared was in relation to the assertion that we can
only provide an equitable education if we have all this extra space.


Unfortunately, the tests scores show that even though we have more space
per pupil than our neighbors, our high-needs students show less growth than
the average of the state. Scores for our high-needs children have actually
dropped more than the state average since we moved into the new school.  I
have copied the relevant analysis below. Equitable education is very
important, but it doesn’t seem like having all this extra space is helping
us further that goal.


The analysis is not trying to show a tie between LEAP and academic
achievement.


No one is suggesting we host LEAP off campus. What we are asking for is for
a good faith effort to at least study the possibility of hosting LEAP in
the school and consider lowering the tax burden for our town. We have a
beautiful new school that sits empty in the afternoons. There should be a
happy medium between 100% shared space and 5000 square feet of dedicated
space in the school. It seems to me that with some ingenuity, we should be
able to retain what makes LEAP special, at a far lesser cost than $3.4M. We
are going to have to solve for this anyway if LEAP is going to reside in
the school during construction. At the very least, we owe ourselves to
study the possibility.


If Leap were in the school, the children would get easy access to the gym,
art rooms, playgrounds, other school activities like the play and music
classes, handicap-accessible restrooms and a modern HVAC system.


———-

Analysis previously shared:


Our high needs students exhibited average growth
<https://profiles.doe.mass.edu/mcas/subgroups2.aspx?linkid=25=01570025=2023=6;>
in the 43th percentile and 46th percentile for the State MCAS in ELA and
Math respectively last school year, both unfortunately below the average
for high needs students in the State. Actually, since we moved into our new
school two years ago (one for elementary), high needs students MCAS scores
at the Lincoln School have dropped 8pp in ELA and 2pp Math, 6pp worse than
the average for high needs students in the State (-3pp in ELA, but +5pp in
Math). It does not seem that this extra space is yielding an equitable
education for all.



>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Philana Mia Gnatowski 
> Date: Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 13:48
> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations
> To: Peter Buchthal 
> CC: Listserv Listserv 
>
>
> Hello LT,
>
> I wanted to weigh in on this lively debate as both a former LEAP employee
> and as someone who grew up in Lincoln and chose to move back and raise her
> kids here. I believe that LEAP must remain in its own dedicated space on
> campus.
>
> In my experience as LEAP's middle school coordinator for 6 years, having
> our own building was extremely important for our day to day operations.
> Some have suggested that there is no overlap between the end of the school
> day and the beginning of LEAP's programming, but unless things have
> changed drastically, I do not believe this is the case. This is because the
> "start of day" for a LEAP teacher doesn't begin when the kids' school day
> ends. It starts with cleaning, set up and prep work for art projects or
> other activities. Having sufficient time and space to sit down with fellow
> teachers, without the children present, to discuss issues for the day is
> extremely important for both the quality of the programming and the staff's
> morale. It ensures that every staff member is on the same page and working
> as a cohesive unit to meet students' needs. From my understanding, the
> school building cannot accommodate this.
>
> Renting space off campus would drastically change the role LEAP plays
> facilitating students' other enrichment offerings. One of the many perks of
> being on the school campus is that LEAP staff also walk students to and
> from other after school activities. These kids don't have to miss out on
> gymnastics, theatre, tennis or music class. I remember my former boss
> saying to me that "we are very lucky to be able to rent a space on campus."
> Most private, non profit after school programs, like ours, don't operate on
> campus, requiring kids to be driven there. And once there, they stay there,
> until picked up by a caregiver.
>
> The idea proposed that there is no correlation between LEAP having its own
> building and improved academic scores among its students begs a deeper
> question: what are afterschool programs for? I have always believed that
> LEAP was more about social/emotional growth than academic outco

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-10-02 Thread Philana Mia Gnatowski
Hello LT,

I wanted to weigh in on this lively debate as both a former LEAP employee
and as someone who grew up in Lincoln and chose to move back and raise her
kids here. I believe that LEAP must remain in its own dedicated space on
campus.

In my experience as LEAP's middle school coordinator for 6 years, having
our own building was extremely important for our day to day operations.
Some have suggested that there is no overlap between the end of the school
day and the beginning of LEAP's programming, but unless things have changed
drastically, I do not believe this is the case. This is because the "start
of day" for a LEAP teacher doesn't begin when the kids' school day ends. It
starts with cleaning, set up and prep work for art projects or other
activities. Having sufficient time and space to sit down with fellow
teachers, without the children present, to discuss issues for the day is
extremely important for both the quality of the programming and the staff's
morale. It ensures that every staff member is on the same page and working
as a cohesive unit to meet students' needs. From my understanding, the
school building cannot accommodate this.

Renting space off campus would drastically change the role LEAP plays
facilitating students' other enrichment offerings. One of the many perks of
being on the school campus is that LEAP staff also walk students to and
from other after school activities. These kids don't have to miss out on
gymnastics, theatre, tennis or music class. I remember my former boss
saying to me that "we are very lucky to be able to rent a space on campus."
Most private, non profit after school programs, like ours, don't operate on
campus, requiring kids to be driven there. And once there, they stay there,
until picked up by a caregiver.

The idea proposed that there is no correlation between LEAP having its own
building and improved academic scores among its students begs a deeper
question: what are afterschool programs for? I have always believed that
LEAP was more about social/emotional growth than academic outcomes. Does
the program also support kids academically? Of course. I spent a lot of
time helping students with their homework and empowering them to believe in
their own capabilities as a student. Did this improve their test scores? I
have no idea. My goal was to be someone they could trust asking for help.
Because I believe that is an important life skill: being able to recognize
when you don't understand something and ask another person for advice. That
is something I always felt the LEAP program, in my time there, did better
than most. We created a safe environment, where kids could be kids, and
felt comfortable trying new things, making new friends, voicing their
opinions. Maybe having our own building didn’t create this dynamic. But it
did offer stability. A place where kids could see their art work on the
wall, a cubby where they could store extra clothing or trinkets from home,
a place that felt like it was theirs and not transient or shared with
anything or anyone else.

I know this email will be met with opposition. And I welcome it. We’re not
always going to agree. And not all of us are going to be happy with the
inevitable outcome, whatever it may be. I just wanted to offer another
perspective for people to consider. And I want to sincerely thank those
volunteering their time on committees trying to figure this all out.

All the best,
Philana

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 7:00 AM Peter Buchthal  wrote:

> *I respectfully disagree with your conclusion.*
>
> *We have been told the LEAP is a critical part of our student offering and
> it must be on the Hartwell Campus.   I agree an extended day offering is
> very important to all school districts at this time.  However, I believe
> Leap could be relocated to the school since the scheduling of the School
> and Leap perfectly fit together with no overlap.  In fact, Leap could share
> space with the school like many other after school programs do today
> without a problem.  If Leap MUST have some dedicated space, we apparently
> have not done any analysis of our current School with our NEW
> administration to see if they are able to provide some dedicated space to
> Leap.  NOTHING has been done, and reported to the community.*
>
> *Two days ago, we learned that during construction, Leap may have to be
> relocated to the School.  WOW.   AGAIN, the School and Leap schedules fit
> perfectly together without any overlap. S**o I guess it is possible that
> the Community may not have to spend at least 3.4 Million dollars to provide
> Leap with a new home if we share some space and find some additional
> dedicated space.   Has anyone been in the new Library at the School?  It is
> half empty.  Maybe we can repurpose or reconfigure some poorly
> designed/used space to be dedicated for Leap  now that we have had
> experience with our new school.   The TAXPAYERS should require at least
> some effort by the interested parties (including the 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-10-02 Thread Peter Buchthal
*I respectfully disagree with your conclusion.*

*We have been told the LEAP is a critical part of our student offering and
it must be on the Hartwell Campus.   I agree an extended day offering is
very important to all school districts at this time.  However, I believe
Leap could be relocated to the school since the scheduling of the School
and Leap perfectly fit together with no overlap.  In fact, Leap could share
space with the school like many other after school programs do today
without a problem.  If Leap MUST have some dedicated space, we apparently
have not done any analysis of our current School with our NEW
administration to see if they are able to provide some dedicated space to
Leap.  NOTHING has been done, and reported to the community.*

*Two days ago, we learned that during construction, Leap may have to be
relocated to the School.  WOW.   AGAIN, the School and Leap schedules fit
perfectly together without any overlap. S**o I guess it is possible that
the Community may not have to spend at least 3.4 Million dollars to provide
Leap with a new home if we share some space and find some additional
dedicated space.   Has anyone been in the new Library at the School?  It is
half empty.  Maybe we can repurpose or reconfigure some poorly
designed/used space to be dedicated for Leap  now that we have had
experience with our new school.   The TAXPAYERS should require at least
some effort by the interested parties (including the Lincoln Taxpayers)
before just concluding that Leap needs a brand new home in Hartwell.*

*Have we benchmarked our Neighboring communities to show how they provide
after school care?  No.  We believe our current offering is superior to an
in-school location without any analysis.  I called up Concord to find out
more about their after school programs.  Each of their three
elementary schools have an afterschool program within their buildings.  On
their short Wednesdays, Concord buses their children  to a common program.
We have enjoyed 40+ years of Leap at Hartwell and the useful life of the
Pod-C building is now over, so I believe we should explore alternatives to
save the town some money.  There has been no suggestion that Leap in
Hartwell improves the students academically over an in-school program.  *

*Shouldn't we at least explore looking at what  our neighbors offer after
school, or should we just agree to higher taxes without any measurable
benefit?*

Peter Buchthal
Weston Rd.

On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 11:26 AM llas902551--- via Lincoln <
lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:

> Hi Kristine thank you for your offering of why LEAP can't go into the
> school. These same reasons is why it is difficult  to have COA  have
> programming in many venues.
> Thank you
> Lynne L
>
> Sent from AOL on Android
> 
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 3:09 PM, Kristine Barker
>  wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> I am a Lincoln resident, a parent to a student who attended Lincoln School
> and an educator in a neighboring district.   I believe this is a unique
> perspective as I can see things from the perspectives of a parent, a
> resident concerned with the town’s finances and an educator.
>
> My son, now a junior at LSRHS, attended LEAP for seven years. As a full
> time working mother, LEAP was a blessing.  My child was nurtured, educated,
> fed, loved and provided with various opportunities to increase his social
> and communication skills.  He was exposed to new people, new experiences
> and appropriately and supportively challenged to engage in activities he
> may never have had the chance to try otherwise.  My only child had a chance
> to just have fun playing with children his age, something he never got to
> do at home or where we live in South Lincoln that doesn’t allow for
> neighborhood play opportunities.  When I would pick him up, he’d often ask
> for “a few more minutes” because he was excited by the opportunities
> provided to him by LEAP staff.  The staff were incredible.  They talked
> lovingly about students, they demonstrated enthusiasm for their work and
> they understood the responsibility of helping to raise other people’s
> children.  I never once entered the LEAP building without an exuberant and
> cheerful greeting from Katie, the tireless and dedicated director of LEAP.
> And somehow, the LEAP team has managed to do all that with a dilapidated
> physical environment that does not even remotely meet their needs.
>
> I completely understand why the notion of moving LEAP into the school
> building makes sense to those who may not spend much time in a school
> building.  Unless the school can provide LEAP with dedicated, *not shared*,
> space that can be fully accessed during the school day, it just won’t
> work.  The LEAP staff deserve opportunities to set up their lessons, access
> materials and prepare for that day.  In a working and busy school, that’s
> just not possible. I have worked in a school where the after 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-10-02 Thread David Cuetos
Those asserting that the school is too big for our student body are not
doing so blindly, they are referencing the Massachusetts School Building
Authority
 (MSBA)
guidelines
.
Is there any evidence to suggest the MSBA's guidelines "do not account for
an equitable education for all"? It seems reasonable to assume that the
State experts have equitable education as a guiding principle.



How do we determine if we are using this extra space effectively? Since we
have so much space per pupil compared to other towns, we would expect high
needs students in Lincoln doing particularly well. The data, however, does
not show that. Our high needs students exhibited average growth

in the 43th percentile and 46th percentile for the State MCAS in ELA and
Math respectively last school year, both unfortunately below the average
for high needs students in the State. Actually, since we moved into our new
school two years ago (one for elementary), high needs students MCAS scores
at the Lincoln School have dropped 8pp in ELA and 2pp Math, 6pp worse than
the average for high needs students in the State (-3pp in ELA, but +5pp in
Math). It does not seem that this extra space is yielding an equitable
education for all. I can think of many ways those tens of millions of
dollars we spent building an extra-large school could have been put to use
in more impactful ways.


We have neighbors with much less space per pupil, yet they house their
LEAP-equivalent programs at the school. A much more in-depth benchmark and
feasibility study should be conducted before asking town residents to shell
out another $3.4M. The potential temporary move of LEAP into the school
during the construction phase also begs the question of why not making it
permanent.


If any reader comes through the school any Thursday evening at 5pm, he or
she will find 28 4-8th graders practicing Math at the 8th grade-hub. We
petitioned the school last year to move out of the pods into the school,
and we are very happy with the arrangement. I hope more activities follow
our trail. High-performing schools are alive with extracurriculars.


David Cuetos

145 Weston Rd

On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 13:21 Sara Mattes  wrote:

> This is helpful-more specificity to better understand why some classrooms
> appear used for only potions of the day, or even go empty.
> It would be helpful if the schools could provide this type of narrative,
> rather than simply saying something cannot be done.
> This is Lincoln, we need to know why!
> You have helped me, at least, fill in the blanks.
>
> Sara
>
>
> --
> Sara Mattes
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2023, at 1:13 PM, Heather Ring via Lincoln <
> lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
>
> To all saying how large our current school is, let’s talk about facts.
> The school houses pre-K to grade 8.  There are not 4 dedicated classrooms
> in each grade; pre-k, grade 1, and grade 3 each have 3 classrooms.  Every
> classroom in the school is in use.  Some rooms are used in flexible ways
> allowing an equitable education for all.  Covid has had a large impact on
> education.  News sources around the country routinely talk about the covid
> impact on education.  To have an equitable education students have
> different needs.  The “extra” space in the school allows the school to meet
> students where they are providing much needed services.  Metrics on
> building size do not account for an equitable education for all.  The
> school does not have the space to meet student educational needs and LEAP
> needs.  We are very lucky to have high quality programming provided by
> LEAP.
>
> -Heather Ring
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> 
>
>
>
> On Sunday, October 1, 2023, 11:26, llas902551--- via Lincoln <
> lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Kristine thank you for your offering of why LEAP can't go into the
> school. These same reasons is why it is difficult  to have COA  have
> programming in many venues.
> Thank you
> Lynne L
>
> Sent from AOL on Android
> 
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 3:09 PM, Kristine Barker
>  wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I am a Lincoln resident, a parent to a student who attended Lincoln School
> and an educator in a neighboring district.   I believe this is a unique
> perspective as I can see things from the perspectives of a parent, a
> resident concerned with the town’s finances and an educator.
>
> My son, now a junior at LSRHS, attended LEAP for seven years. As a full
> time working mother, LEAP was a blessing.  My child was nurtured, educated,
> fed, loved and provided with various opportunities to increase his social
> and communication skills.  

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-10-01 Thread Sara Mattes
This is helpful-more specificity to better understand why some classrooms 
appear used for only potions of the day, or even go empty.
It would be helpful if the schools could provide this type of narrative, rather 
than simply saying something cannot be done.
This is Lincoln, we need to know why!
You have helped me, at least, fill in the blanks.

Sara


--
Sara Mattes




> On Oct 1, 2023, at 1:13 PM, Heather Ring via Lincoln 
>  wrote:
> 
> To all saying how large our current school is, let’s talk about facts.  The 
> school houses pre-K to grade 8.  There are not 4 dedicated classrooms in each 
> grade; pre-k, grade 1, and grade 3 each have 3 classrooms.  Every classroom 
> in the school is in use.  Some rooms are used in flexible ways allowing an 
> equitable education for all.  Covid has had a large impact on education.  
> News sources around the country routinely talk about the covid impact on 
> education.  To have an equitable education students have different needs.  
> The “extra” space in the school allows the school to meet students where they 
> are providing much needed services.  Metrics on building size do not account 
> for an equitable education for all.  The school does not have the space to 
> meet student educational needs and LEAP needs.  We are very lucky to have 
> high quality programming provided by LEAP.   
> 
> -Heather Ring 
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone 
> 
> On Sunday, October 1, 2023, 11:26, llas902551--- via Lincoln 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Kristine thank you for your offering of why LEAP can't go into the school. 
> These same reasons is why it is difficult  to have COA  have programming 
> in many venues.
> Thank you
> Lynne L
> 
> Sent from AOL on Android 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 3:09 PM, Kristine Barker
>  wrote:
> Good afternoon,
> 
> I am a Lincoln resident, a parent to a student who attended Lincoln School 
> and an educator in a neighboring district.   I believe this is a unique 
> perspective as I can see things from the perspectives of a parent, a resident 
> concerned with the town’s finances and an educator.
> 
> My son, now a junior at LSRHS, attended LEAP for seven years. As a full time 
> working mother, LEAP was a blessing.  My child was nurtured, educated, fed, 
> loved and provided with various opportunities to increase his social and 
> communication skills.  He was exposed to new people, new experiences and 
> appropriately and supportively challenged to engage in activities he may 
> never have had the chance to try otherwise.  My only child had a chance to 
> just have fun playing with children his age, something he never got to do at 
> home or where we live in South Lincoln that doesn’t allow for neighborhood 
> play opportunities.  When I would pick him up, he’d often ask for “a few more 
> minutes” because he was excited by the opportunities provided to him by LEAP 
> staff.  The staff were incredible.  They talked lovingly about students, they 
> demonstrated enthusiasm for their work and they understood the responsibility 
> of helping to raise other people’s children.  I never once entered the LEAP 
> building without an exuberant and cheerful greeting from Katie, the tireless 
> and dedicated director of LEAP.  And somehow, the LEAP team has managed to do 
> all that with a dilapidated physical environment that does not even remotely 
> meet their needs. 
> 
> I completely understand why the notion of moving LEAP into the school 
> building makes sense to those who may not spend much time in a school 
> building.  Unless the school can provide LEAP with dedicated, not shared, 
> space that can be fully accessed during the school day, it just won’t work.  
> The LEAP staff deserve opportunities to set up their lessons, access 
> materials and prepare for that day.  In a working and busy school, that’s 
> just not possible. I have worked in a school where the after school staff had 
> to work around the rest of us.  They would literally be prepping for their 
> activities in their vehicles or squatting in corners of the building trying 
> to create materials, get organized or collaborate with one another over 
> student needs. Consequently, they are constantly working in an uncomfortable 
> situation where their professionalism is not always visibly respected. They 
> could never hang student work, because they literally had no walls. They 
> could not use complex and highly engaging learning materials, because there 
> was nowhere to store them.  They could not meet as a team, because they did 
> not have space to do so. They couldn’t provide nutritious snack options, 
> because they had no access to cooking or cooling instruments. The students 
> who attended the after school program felt othered, not included.  I would 
> hate to put LEAP in a similar situation.
> 
> I realize and respect that we live in a largely 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-10-01 Thread llas902551--- via Lincoln
Hi Kristine thank you for your offering of why LEAP can't go into the school. 
These same reasons is why it is difficult  to have COA  have programming in 
many venues.Thank youLynne L

Sent from AOL on Android 
 
  On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 3:09 PM, Kristine Barker 
wrote:   
Good afternoon,


I am a Lincoln resident, a parent to a student who attended Lincoln School and 
an educator in a neighboring district.   I believe this is a unique perspective 
as I can see things from the perspectives of a parent, a resident concerned 
with the town’s finances and an educator.


My son, now a junior at LSRHS, attended LEAP for seven years. As a full time 
working mother, LEAP was a blessing.  My child was nurtured, educated, fed, 
loved and provided with various opportunities to increase his social and 
communication skills.  He was exposed to new people, new experiences and 
appropriately and supportively challenged to engage in activities he may never 
have had the chance to try otherwise.  My only child had a chance to just have 
fun playing with children his age, something he never got to do at home or 
where we live in South Lincoln that doesn’t allow for neighborhood play 
opportunities.  When I would pick him up, he’d often ask for “a few more 
minutes” because he was excited by the opportunities provided to him by LEAP 
staff.  The staff were incredible.  They talked lovingly about students, they 
demonstrated enthusiasm for their work and they understood the responsibility 
of helping to raise other people’s children.  I never once entered the LEAP 
building without an exuberant and cheerful greeting from Katie, the tireless 
and dedicated director of LEAP.  And somehow, the LEAP team has managed to do 
all that with a dilapidated physical environment that does not even remotely 
meet their needs. 


I completely understand why the notion of moving LEAP into the school building 
makes sense to those who may not spend much time in a school building.  Unless 
the school can provide LEAP with dedicated, not shared, space that can be fully 
accessed during the school day, it just won’t work.  The LEAP staff deserve 
opportunities to set up their lessons, access materials and prepare for that 
day.  In a working and busy school, that’s just not possible. I have worked in 
a school where the after school staff had to work around the rest of us.  They 
would literally be prepping for their activities in their vehicles or squatting 
in corners of the building trying to create materials, get organized or 
collaborate with one another over student needs. Consequently, they are 
constantly working in an uncomfortable situation where their professionalism is 
not always visibly respected. They could never hang student work, because they 
literally had no walls. They could not use complex and highly engaging learning 
materials, because there was nowhere to store them.  They could not meet as a 
team, because they did not have space to do so. They couldn’t provide 
nutritious snack options, because they had no access to cooking or cooling 
instruments. The students who attended the after school program felt othered, 
not included.  I would hate to put LEAP in a similar situation.


I realize and respect that we live in a largely affluent town where quality 
childcare may not be as much of a critical need as in other areas.  However, 
for some of us, affordable childcare is an invaluable necessity so we can work 
and earn enough income to allow our families to grow and thrive in a wonderful 
town like Lincoln.  Just like not everyone in our town may see the need for a 
community center where our aging population can access resources, not everyone 
may see why LEAP is not an entity which we can push aside or ignore.  I hope 
this can help share some perspective as to how important LEAP is to our 
community.  


I am grateful for the many efforts and ideas shared to help solve the space 
challenges in our town. I appreciate the opportunity I’ve had to read 
everyone’s intelligent and unique ideas about how to solve these problems.  I 
won’t even pretend to hold a tiny fraction of the knowledge others do on this 
subject.  In my perfect world, we would ideally find alternatives that 
celebrate and support resources that benefit our youngest to our oldest 
residents.  In fact, one might argue that combining these needs into one 
building could, in fact, greatly benefit both.  I can’t think of anything more 
valuable to our older neighbors than watching our youngest residents thrive in 
a space that is happy, clean, safe and reflective of the diverse and unique 
needs of our town’s young students.


Respectfully,

Kristine Barker


On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:55 AM kathryn hawkins  
wrote:

Dear Lincoln-
I would love to extend an invitation to anybody who would like to come visit 
LEAP during the peak hours of operation.  We run during the hours of 2pm-6pm m, 
t, th, and f, 12pm-6pm on Wednesdays.  On an average day we have 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations / location of LEAP

2023-09-29 Thread Joanna Owen Schmergel via Lincoln
Amen


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Friday, September 29, 2023, 3:29 PM, John Mendelson 
 wrote:

This thread is about housing LEAP during construction.  
To insinuate there is a a real risk to kids "so close to an active construction 
site, with all the potential for safety hazards as well as exposure to toxic 
construction materials" is absurd and demonstrates a complete lack of faith in 
town administration and in members of the CCBC.  It is a completely unnecessary 
red herring lobbed into the fray.  Did we not just accommodate 550+ students, 
faculty, and staff virtually seamlessly on site while renovating the entire 
school?  Why would anyone think anything less would be tolerated in the case of 
this construction project?
LEAP was and is represented on the CCBC by Kathryn Hawkins.  See: 
https://www.lincolntown.org/1346/Community-Center-Building-Committee
John


On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:01 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:

Andy,This is very important information and I wish it had guided discussions 
long before we got to where we are today.
As LEAP is integral to school programming, it’s location has always been part 
of the discussion, but we had not heard so directly and definitively that there 
are serious implications for design choice that will influence the potential 
cost of ensuring LEAP was is located in such a way as to continue safe and 
efficacious programming.I am surprised that , given the importance of LEAP, 
there was not a rep. on the CCBC, raising these issues early and often and 
incorporating them into planning.Susan Taylor was often a voice, but only in 
reminding all that LEAP and movement of children around campus needed to be 
considered.She has been a strong and effective advocate for these safety 
concerns.
But it is imperative for us to know the potential plans (and costs) for LEAP's 
ongoing operations as we attempt to narrow down design choices.
We are now in very uncertain waters.
Thoughts on how best to proceed to get the best information as we look at 
design?
Sara
--
Sara Mattes





On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:17 PM, Andy Wang  wrote:
I wanted to point out that the comment the CCBC made about LEAP continuing in 
the Pod C during construction was a comment, not a plan.  There was also 
discussion in a prior meeting about splitting LEAP to the school and the 
Hartwell building during construction. None of these have been vetted with LEAP 
and EEC (LEAP’s Licensing board) for suitability, safety, or feasibility.  LEAP 
is actively monitoring the evolution of the plans of the CCBC and its impact 
both during construction and in its final instantiation.  It’s hard to say the 
exact approach LEAP will take until a specific direction is selected by the 
town for the CCBC, but it is definitely something we are tracking.
Folks can rest assured that whatever approach is taken, safety of the kids is 
of paramount importance.

AndyPresident, LEAP board of Directors





On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:29 AM Karla Gravis  wrote:


According to a recent communicationwith the CCBC, the current thought is that 
the LEAP program will continue tooperate in Pod C during the 
construction/renovation phase of the communitycenter. This raises serious 
concerns to me.

If we look at Option 1 (100% design),construction of the community center will 
overlap with the location of Pod C(graph below - the blue square is my 
approximation of where Pod C sits based onCCBC docs). This means that LEAP 
would probably be part of an active construction site!In the 75% and 50% 
designs, LEAP would be right next to the constructionsite. 

I am concerned about having childrenso close to an active construction site, 
with all the potential for safetyhazards as well as exposure to toxic 
construction materials. Not sure how LEAPaccess to the septic system will be 
impacted during construction. I have toassume that construction will last at 
least 12 months if not more.


In the most recent CCBC meeting, thearchitects estimated that the LEAP portion 
of the project adds ~$3.4M to thecost. We owe it to our community to at least 
consider the possibility of savingmoney for the town while ensuring the best 
for our children.

Our net-zero brand-new school offers adequate space and access to new 
playgrounds, and since the LEAP program runs after regular school hours, 
there's no scheduling conflict. We would be making the transition for kids 
attending the program much easier. The math team already meets in a hub once a 
week. Why wouldn't we use the school for more hours of the day?









-- Forwarded message -
From: melinda bruno-smith 
Date: Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations
To: Magruder Donaldson 
Cc: Peter Buchthal , Listserv Listserv 



Agreed.
Sent from my iPhone
Melinda Bruno-Smith



On Sep 29, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Magruder Donaldson  wrote:

There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…Craig 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations / location of LEAP

2023-09-29 Thread Carol Ryan
Sep 29, 2023 at 9:44 AMSubject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerationsTo: Magruder Donaldson <mcdonaldso...@gmail.com>Cc: Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com>, Listserv Listserv <Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>




Agreed.

Sent from my iPhone

Melinda Bruno-Smith










On Sep 29, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Magruder Donaldson <mcdonaldso...@gmail.com> wrote:



There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
Craig Donaldson


On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com> wrote:



The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a declining school population.  The architect and school administration at the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More recently, the school architects publicly told
 fellow architects that the school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4 simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines for a new school,
 our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000 students.  


It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain facts.  



What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them as I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't be accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  at Hartwell because of the parking,
 traffic and safety concerns.  The new community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 to 2:30 on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.  


The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling the community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using many if not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 open spots at any given time or maybe even
 fewer if there are events/meetings going on at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose room, training room or School business office.




I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors. I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes with so many restrictions/limitations.



Peter Buchthal
71 Weston Rd



On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson <johntmendel...@gmail.com> wrote:


You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for one, don't.  


In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris, perhaps well-intentioned but overly
 wrought disagreements about site and design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.


To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but believe that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to increase and the impact of the project diminished.


I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their recommendation. 


John




On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com> wrote:





People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't believe this building project is about accepting our responsibility for taking care of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to 97 and was a big user of his local Council
 on Aging.  You apparently believe that if one does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't support our Council on Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.  


Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with the school. There is also a healthy
 debate on whether it makes sense to build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and school age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot mishaps. 
 I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that  intentionally colocates a senior center and  daycare using a small shared parking lot.   


Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis Hall.   


As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita debt in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes and many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't listened to the public's concerns.  


In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings within the school as the hours of a schoo

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations / location of LEAP

2023-09-29 Thread Karla Gravis
avis 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> According to a recent communication with the CCBC, the current thought
>>> is that the LEAP program will continue to operate in Pod C during the
>>> construction/renovation phase of the community center. This raises serious
>>> concerns to me.
>>>
>>> If we look at Option 1 (100% design), construction of the community
>>> center will overlap with the location of Pod C (graph below - the blue
>>> square is my approximation of where Pod C sits based on CCBC docs). This
>>> means that LEAP would probably be part of an active construction site! In
>>> the 75% and 50% designs, LEAP would be right next to the construction site.
>>>
>>> I am concerned about having children so close to an active construction
>>> site, with all the potential for safety hazards as well as exposure to
>>> toxic construction materials. Not sure how LEAP access to the septic system
>>> will be impacted during construction. I have to assume that construction
>>> will last at least 12 months if not more.
>>>
>>> In the most recent CCBC meeting, the architects estimated that the LEAP
>>> portion of the project adds ~$3.4M to the cost. We owe it to our community
>>> to at least consider the possibility of saving money for the town while
>>> ensuring the best for our children.
>>>
>>> Our net-zero brand-new school offers adequate space and access to new
>>> playgrounds, and since the LEAP program runs after regular school hours,
>>> there's no scheduling conflict. We would be making the transition for kids
>>> attending the program much easier. The math team already meets in a hub
>>> once a week. Why wouldn't we use the school for more hours of the day?
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Forwarded message -
>>>> From: melinda bruno-smith 
>>>> Date: Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:44 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations
>>>> To: Magruder Donaldson 
>>>> Cc: Peter Buchthal , Listserv Listserv <
>>>> Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> Melinda Bruno-Smith
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 29, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Magruder Donaldson <
>>>> mcdonaldso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
>>>> Craig Donaldson
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a
>>>>> declining school population.  The architect and school administration at
>>>>> the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More
>>>>> recently, the school architects publicly told fellow architects that the
>>>>> school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate
>>>>> classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4
>>>>> simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines
>>>>> for a new school, our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000
>>>>> students.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain
>>>>> facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of
>>>>> them as I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal
>>>>> won't be accomplished with the limited available hours for senior
>>>>> programming  at Hartwell because of the parking, traffic and safety
>>>>> concerns.  The new community center will have senior programming by design
>>>>> only from 9 to 2:30 on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without
>>>>> telling the community that the current users of Hartwell may already be
>>>>> using many if not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to
>>>>> 10 open spots at any given time or maybe even fewer if there are
>>>>> events/meetings going on at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose
>>>>> room, training room or School bus

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations / location of LEAP

2023-09-29 Thread Sara Mattes
 exposure to 
>>>> toxic construction materials. Not sure how LEAP access to the septic 
>>>> system will be impacted during construction. I have to assume that 
>>>> construction will last at least 12 months if not more.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In the most recent CCBC meeting, the architects estimated that the LEAP 
>>>> portion of the project adds ~$3.4M to the cost. We owe it to our community 
>>>> to at least consider the possibility of saving money for the town while 
>>>> ensuring the best for our children.
>>>> 
>>>> Our net-zero brand-new school offers adequate space and access to new 
>>>> playgrounds, and since the LEAP program runs after regular school hours, 
>>>> there's no scheduling conflict. We would be making the transition for kids 
>>>> attending the program much easier. The math team already meets in a hub 
>>>> once a week. Why wouldn't we use the school for more hours of the day?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- Forwarded message -
>>>>> From: melinda bruno-smith >>>> <mailto:melindabr...@hotmail.com>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:44 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations
>>>>> To: Magruder Donaldson >>>> <mailto:mcdonaldso...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> Cc: Peter Buchthal mailto:pbucht...@gmail.com>>, 
>>>>> Listserv Listserv >>>> <mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Agreed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> Melinda Bruno-Smith
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 29, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Magruder Donaldson >>>> <mailto:mcdonaldso...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
>>>>> Craig Donaldson
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal >>>> <mailto:pbucht...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a 
>>>>>> declining school population.  The architect and school administration at 
>>>>>> the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More 
>>>>>> recently, the school architects publicly told fellow architects that the 
>>>>>> school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 
>>>>>> separate classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4 
>>>>>> simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines 
>>>>>> for a new school, our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000 
>>>>>> students.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain 
>>>>>> facts.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them 
>>>>>> as I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't 
>>>>>> be accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  
>>>>>> at Hartwell because of the parking, traffic and safety concerns.  The 
>>>>>> new community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 
>>>>>> to 2:30 on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling 
>>>>>> the community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using 
>>>>>> many if not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 
>>>>>> open spots at any given time or maybe even fewer if there are 
>>>>>> events/meetings going on at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose 
>>>>>> room, training room or School business office.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in 
>>>>>> Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its 
>>>>>> seniors. I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location 
>>>>

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations / location of LEAP

2023-09-29 Thread John Mendelson
This thread is about housing LEAP during construction.

To insinuate there is a a real risk to kids "so close to an active
construction site, with all the potential for safety hazards as well as
exposure to toxic construction materials" is absurd and demonstrates a
complete lack of faith in town administration and in members of the CCBC.
It is a completely unnecessary red herring lobbed into the fray.  Did we
not just accommodate 550+ students, faculty, and staff virtually
seamlessly on site while renovating the entire school?  Why would anyone
think anything less would be tolerated in the case of this construction
project?

LEAP was and is represented on the CCBC by Kathryn Hawkins.  See:
https://www.lincolntown.org/1346/Community-Center-Building-Committee

John



On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 2:01 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:

> Andy,
> This is very important information and I wish it had guided discussions
> long before we got to where we are today.
>
> As LEAP is integral to school programming, it’s location has always been
> part of the discussion, but we had not heard so directly and definitively
> that there are serious implications for design choice that will influence
> the potential cost of ensuring LEAP was is located in such a way as to
> continue safe and efficacious programming.
> I am surprised that , given the importance of LEAP, there was not a rep.
> on the CCBC, raising these issues early and often and incorporating them
> into planning.
> Susan Taylor was often a voice, but only in reminding all that LEAP and
> movement of children around campus needed to be considered.
> She has been a strong and effective advocate for these safety concerns.
>
> But it is imperative for us to know the potential plans (and costs) for
> LEAP's ongoing operations as we attempt to narrow down design choices.
>
> We are now in very uncertain waters.
>
> Thoughts on how best to proceed to get the best information as we look at
> design?
>
> Sara
> --
> Sara Mattes
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:17 PM, Andy Wang  wrote:
>
> I wanted to point out that the comment the CCBC made about LEAP continuing
> in the Pod C during construction was a comment, not a plan.  There was also
> discussion in a prior meeting about splitting LEAP to the school and the
> Hartwell building during construction. None of these have been vetted with
> LEAP and EEC (LEAP’s Licensing board) for suitability, safety, or
> feasibility.  LEAP is actively monitoring the evolution of the plans of the
> CCBC and its impact both during construction and in its final
> instantiation.  It’s hard to say the exact approach LEAP will take until a
> specific direction is selected by the town for the CCBC, but it is
> definitely something we are tracking.
>
> Folks can rest assured that whatever approach is taken, safety of the kids
> is of paramount importance.
>
> Andy
> President, LEAP board of Directors
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:29 AM Karla Gravis 
> wrote:
>
>> According to a recent communication with the CCBC, the current thought is
>> that the LEAP program will continue to operate in Pod C during the
>> construction/renovation phase of the community center. This raises serious
>> concerns to me.
>>
>> If we look at Option 1 (100% design), construction of the community
>> center will overlap with the location of Pod C (graph below - the blue
>> square is my approximation of where Pod C sits based on CCBC docs). This
>> means that LEAP would probably be part of an active construction site! In
>> the 75% and 50% designs, LEAP would be right next to the construction site.
>>
>> I am concerned about having children so close to an active construction
>> site, with all the potential for safety hazards as well as exposure to
>> toxic construction materials. Not sure how LEAP access to the septic system
>> will be impacted during construction. I have to assume that construction
>> will last at least 12 months if not more.
>>
>> In the most recent CCBC meeting, the architects estimated that the LEAP
>> portion of the project adds ~$3.4M to the cost. We owe it to our community
>> to at least consider the possibility of saving money for the town while
>> ensuring the best for our children.
>>
>> Our net-zero brand-new school offers adequate space and access to new
>> playgrounds, and since the LEAP program runs after regular school hours,
>> there's no scheduling conflict. We would be making the transition for kids
>> attending the program much easier. The math team already meets in a hub
>> once a week. Why wouldn't we use the school for more hours of the day?
>> 
>>
>>
>>

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-29 Thread Kristine Barker
Good afternoon,

I am a Lincoln resident, a parent to a student who attended Lincoln School
and an educator in a neighboring district.   I believe this is a unique
perspective as I can see things from the perspectives of a parent, a
resident concerned with the town’s finances and an educator.

My son, now a junior at LSRHS, attended LEAP for seven years. As a full
time working mother, LEAP was a blessing.  My child was nurtured, educated,
fed, loved and provided with various opportunities to increase his social
and communication skills.  He was exposed to new people, new experiences
and appropriately and supportively challenged to engage in activities he
may never have had the chance to try otherwise.  My only child had a chance
to just have fun playing with children his age, something he never got to
do at home or where we live in South Lincoln that doesn’t allow for
neighborhood play opportunities.  When I would pick him up, he’d often ask
for “a few more minutes” because he was excited by the opportunities
provided to him by LEAP staff.  The staff were incredible.  They talked
lovingly about students, they demonstrated enthusiasm for their work and
they understood the responsibility of helping to raise other people’s
children.  I never once entered the LEAP building without an exuberant and
cheerful greeting from Katie, the tireless and dedicated director of LEAP.
And somehow, the LEAP team has managed to do all that with a dilapidated
physical environment that does not even remotely meet their needs.

I completely understand why the notion of moving LEAP into the school
building makes sense to those who may not spend much time in a school
building.  Unless the school can provide LEAP with dedicated, *not shared*,
space that can be fully accessed during the school day, it just won’t
work.  The LEAP staff deserve opportunities to set up their lessons, access
materials and prepare for that day.  In a working and busy school, that’s
just not possible. I have worked in a school where the after school staff
had to work around the rest of us.  They would literally be prepping for
their activities in their vehicles or squatting in corners of the building
trying to create materials, get organized or collaborate with one another
over student needs. Consequently, they are constantly working in an
uncomfortable situation where their professionalism is not always visibly
respected. They could never hang student work, because they literally had
no walls. They could not use complex and highly engaging learning
materials, because there was nowhere to store them.  They could not meet as
a team, because they did not have space to do so. They couldn’t provide
nutritious snack options, because they had no access to cooking or cooling
instruments. The students who attended the after school program felt
othered, not included.  I would hate to put LEAP in a similar situation.

I realize and respect that we live in a largely affluent town where quality
childcare may not be as much of a critical need as in other areas.
However, for some of us, affordable childcare is an invaluable necessity so
we can work and earn enough income to allow our families to grow and thrive
in a wonderful town like Lincoln.  Just like not everyone in our town may
see the need for a community center where our aging population can access
resources, not everyone may see why LEAP is not an entity which we can push
aside or ignore.  I hope this can help share some perspective as to how
important LEAP is to our community.

I am grateful for the many efforts and ideas shared to help solve the space
challenges in our town. I appreciate the opportunity I’ve had to read
everyone’s intelligent and unique ideas about how to solve these problems.
I won’t even pretend to hold a tiny fraction of the knowledge others do on
this subject.  In my perfect world, we would ideally find alternatives that
celebrate and support resources that benefit our youngest to our oldest
residents.  In fact, one might argue that combining these needs into one
building could, in fact, greatly benefit both.  I can’t think of anything
more valuable to our older neighbors than watching our youngest residents
thrive in a space that is happy, clean, safe and reflective of the diverse
and unique needs of our town’s young students.


Respectfully,

Kristine Barker


On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:55 AM kathryn hawkins 
wrote:

> Dear Lincoln-
>
> I would love to extend an invitation to anybody who would like to come
> visit LEAP during the peak hours of operation.  We run during the hours of
> 2pm-6pm m, t, th, and f, 12pm-6pm on Wednesdays.  On an average day we have
> over 100 children and 20 staff in constant motion.  We are over seen by the
> Department of Early Education and Care, our program is not only child care
> for the 100 families we serve… but we offer enrichment, education, and a
> safe and caring space for children to feel “at home” while their families
> are at work.
> We are a 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations / location of LEAP

2023-09-29 Thread Sara Mattes
Andy,
This is very important information and I wish it had guided discussions long 
before we got to where we are today.

As LEAP is integral to school programming, it’s location has always been part 
of the discussion, but we had not heard so directly and definitively that there 
are serious implications for design choice that will influence the potential 
cost of ensuring LEAP was is located in such a way as to continue safe and 
efficacious programming.
I am surprised that , given the importance of LEAP, there was not a rep. on the 
CCBC, raising these issues early and often and incorporating them into planning.
Susan Taylor was often a voice, but only in reminding all that LEAP and 
movement of children around campus needed to be considered.
She has been a strong and effective advocate for these safety concerns.

But it is imperative for us to know the potential plans (and costs) for LEAP's 
ongoing operations as we attempt to narrow down design choices.

We are now in very uncertain waters.

Thoughts on how best to proceed to get the best information as we look at 
design?

Sara
--
Sara Mattes




> On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:17 PM, Andy Wang  wrote:
> 
> I wanted to point out that the comment the CCBC made about LEAP continuing in 
> the Pod C during construction was a comment, not a plan.  There was also 
> discussion in a prior meeting about splitting LEAP to the school and the 
> Hartwell building during construction. None of these have been vetted with 
> LEAP and EEC (LEAP’s Licensing board) for suitability, safety, or 
> feasibility.  LEAP is actively monitoring the evolution of the plans of the 
> CCBC and its impact both during construction and in its final instantiation.  
> It’s hard to say the exact approach LEAP will take until a specific direction 
> is selected by the town for the CCBC, but it is definitely something we are 
> tracking.
> 
> Folks can rest assured that whatever approach is taken, safety of the kids is 
> of paramount importance.
> 
> Andy
> President, LEAP board of Directors
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:29 AM Karla Gravis  <mailto:karlagra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> According to a recent communication with the CCBC, the current thought is 
>> that the LEAP program will continue to operate in Pod C during the 
>> construction/renovation phase of the community center. This raises serious 
>> concerns to me.
>> 
>> If we look at Option 1 (100% design), construction of the community center 
>> will overlap with the location of Pod C (graph below - the blue square is my 
>> approximation of where Pod C sits based on CCBC docs). This means that LEAP 
>> would probably be part of an active construction site! In the 75% and 50% 
>> designs, LEAP would be right next to the construction site. 
>> 
>> I am concerned about having children so close to an active construction 
>> site, with all the potential for safety hazards as well as exposure to toxic 
>> construction materials. Not sure how LEAP access to the septic system will 
>> be impacted during construction. I have to assume that construction will 
>> last at least 12 months if not more.
>> 
>> 
>> In the most recent CCBC meeting, the architects estimated that the LEAP 
>> portion of the project adds ~$3.4M to the cost. We owe it to our community 
>> to at least consider the possibility of saving money for the town while 
>> ensuring the best for our children.
>> 
>> Our net-zero brand-new school offers adequate space and access to new 
>> playgrounds, and since the LEAP program runs after regular school hours, 
>> there's no scheduling conflict. We would be making the transition for kids 
>> attending the program much easier. The math team already meets in a hub once 
>> a week. Why wouldn't we use the school for more hours of the day?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- Forwarded message -
>>> From: melinda bruno-smith >> <mailto:melindabr...@hotmail.com>>
>>> Date: Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:44 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations
>>> To: Magruder Donaldson >> <mailto:mcdonaldso...@gmail.com>>
>>> Cc: Peter Buchthal mailto:pbucht...@gmail.com>>, 
>>> Listserv Listserv mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Agreed.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> Melinda Bruno-Smith
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 29, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Magruder Donaldson >> <mailto:mcdonaldso...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> There must 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-29 Thread llas902551--- via Lincoln

Bob your thoughts are exactly why CC shd be large enough for all activities, 
etc. in one place so people don't have to go to various places for activities 
as they do now which is not the ideal situation. Why can't the CC have the same 
needs listed as LEAP interests??Lynne LSent from AOL on Android
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:58 AM, Bob Kupperstein 
wrote:--The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to 
Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription 
settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.







 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations / location of LEAP

2023-09-29 Thread Carol Ryan
I was an instructor for an after school arts program in Malden. We ran the class in the school art room, messy projects and all sorts of creative work. We set upour projects and cleaned up at the end. It’s not evident why Leap requires a space other than the school facilities.In my experience it is typical for indoor after school programs to be in the school buildings. Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 29, 2023, at 11:29 AM, Karla Gravis  wrote:According to a recent communication
with the CCBC, the current thought is that the LEAP program will continue to
operate in Pod C during the construction/renovation phase of the community
center. This raises serious concerns to me.If we look at Option 1 (100% design),
construction of the community center will overlap with the location of Pod C
(graph below - the blue square is my approximation of where Pod C sits based on
CCBC docs). This means that LEAP would probably be part of an active construction site!
In the 75% and 50% designs, LEAP would be right next to the construction
site. I am concerned about having children
so close to an active construction site, with all the potential for safety
hazards as well as exposure to toxic construction materials. Not sure how LEAP
access to the septic system will be impacted during construction. I have to
assume that construction will last at least 12 months if not more.







In the most recent CCBC meeting, the
architects estimated that the LEAP portion of the project adds ~$3.4M to the
cost. We owe it to our community to at least consider the possibility of saving
money for the town while ensuring the best for our children.Our net-zero brand-new school offers adequate space and access to new playgrounds, and since the LEAP program runs after regular school hours, there's no scheduling conflict. We would be making the transition for kids attending the program much easier. The math team already meets in a hub once a week. Why wouldn't we use the school for more hours of the day?-- Forwarded message -From: melinda bruno-smith <melindabr...@hotmail.com>Date: Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 9:44 AMSubject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerationsTo: Magruder Donaldson <mcdonaldso...@gmail.com>Cc: Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com>, Listserv Listserv <Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>




Agreed.

Sent from my iPhone

Melinda Bruno-Smith










On Sep 29, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Magruder Donaldson <mcdonaldso...@gmail.com> wrote:



There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
Craig Donaldson


On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal <pbucht...@gmail.com> wrote:



The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a declining school population.  The architect and school administration at the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More recently, the school architects publicly told
 fellow architects that the school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4 simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines for a new school,
 our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000 students.  


It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain facts.  



What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them as I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't be accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  at Hartwell because of the parking,
 traffic and safety concerns.  The new community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 to 2:30 on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.  


The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling the community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using many if not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 open spots at any given time or maybe even
 fewer if there are events/meetings going on at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose room, training room or School business office.




I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors. I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes with so many restrictions/limitations.



Peter Buchthal
71 Weston Rd



On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson <johntmendel...@gmail.com> wrote:


You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for one, don't.  


In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris, perhaps well-intentioned but overly
 wrought disagreements about site and design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.


To my ear, this dialogue sounds v

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-29 Thread kathryn hawkins
Dear Lincoln-

I would love to extend an invitation to anybody who would like to come
visit LEAP during the peak hours of operation.  We run during the hours of
2pm-6pm m, t, th, and f, 12pm-6pm on Wednesdays.  On an average day we have
over 100 children and 20 staff in constant motion.  We are over seen by the
Department of Early Education and Care, our program is not only child care
for the 100 families we serve… but we offer enrichment, education, and a
safe and caring space for children to feel “at home” while their families
are at work.
We are a non-profit and we rent yearly from the town .  When you walk into
our building it is covered in beautiful, creative art work, science
projects, games, and laughter that the LEAP children are so proud of and
that our amazing staff spend hours preparing to offer each day.  We house
an abundance of wonderful supplies, games, sporting goods, couches, air
hockey tables, a kitchen that we bake in, etc..throughout the building and
in our supply sheds.
We have been lucky to occupy Pod C since 1985, and have made it the “home
away from home” for so many children.
We utilize the amazing green space that we are able to open our doors and
pour out into, for a great game of soccer, capture the flag, kickball,
imaginative play..and so on.  LEAP is important to this community, we are
not disposable and to think that we could just move into the school is an
absurd idea.
Remember “it takes a village to raise a child” and we are very much a part
of this village!

Please come visit, we would love to show you what LEAP is all about.

Kathryn Hawkins
Director of LEAP
781-259-0615


Sent from Gmail Mobile


On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:58 AM Bob Kupperstein  wrote:

> I believe that a major issue for LEAP using space within the schools is
> that they have a variety of activities with furniture/supplies/equipment,
> etc. in place for the kids when they arrive.  Sharing space with the
> schools would most likely require extensive setup/tear-down on a daily
> basis (along with storage space), as they wouldn't have their own dedicated
> space.
>
> Based on our kid's experience at LEAP through their school years, it would
> seem like that would be a pretty major limitation on their activities and
> the operations of the program (especially considering that the
> starting/ending times are likely already the most hectic times for the
> staff).
>
> The existing set-up space is *one* of the things that makes LEAP such a
> great program for our kids.
>
> LEAP staff may have other reasons why sharing school space might not be so
> seamless - this is just one that occurred to me as a former LEAP-parent.
>
> -Bob
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 8:17 AM Magruder Donaldson <
> mcdonaldso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
>> Craig Donaldson
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a
>>> declining school population.  The architect and school administration at
>>> the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More
>>> recently, the school architects publicly told fellow architects that the
>>> school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate
>>> classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4
>>> simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines
>>> for a new school, our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000
>>> students.
>>>
>>> It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain
>>> facts.
>>>
>>> What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them
>>> as I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't be
>>> accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  at
>>> Hartwell because of the parking, traffic and safety concerns.  The new
>>> community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 to 2:30
>>> on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.
>>>
>>> The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling
>>> the community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using many
>>> if not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 open
>>> spots at any given time or maybe even fewer if there are events/meetings
>>> going on at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose room, training room
>>> or School business office.
>>>
>>> I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in
>>> Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors.
>>> I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes
>>> with so many restrictions/limitations.
>>>
>>> Peter Buchthal
>>> 71 Weston Rd
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson <
>>> johntmendel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for
 one, don't.

 In my 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-29 Thread Bob Kupperstein
I believe that a major issue for LEAP using space within the schools is
that they have a variety of activities with furniture/supplies/equipment,
etc. in place for the kids when they arrive.  Sharing space with the
schools would most likely require extensive setup/tear-down on a daily
basis (along with storage space), as they wouldn't have their own dedicated
space.

Based on our kid's experience at LEAP through their school years, it would
seem like that would be a pretty major limitation on their activities and
the operations of the program (especially considering that the
starting/ending times are likely already the most hectic times for the
staff).

The existing set-up space is *one* of the things that makes LEAP such a
great program for our kids.

LEAP staff may have other reasons why sharing school space might not be so
seamless - this is just one that occurred to me as a former LEAP-parent.

-Bob

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 8:17 AM Magruder Donaldson 
wrote:

> There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
> Craig Donaldson
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal 
> wrote:
>
>> The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a
>> declining school population.  The architect and school administration at
>> the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More
>> recently, the school architects publicly told fellow architects that the
>> school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate
>> classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4
>> simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines
>> for a new school, our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000
>> students.
>>
>> It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain
>> facts.
>>
>> What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them
>> as I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't be
>> accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  at
>> Hartwell because of the parking, traffic and safety concerns.  The new
>> community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 to 2:30
>> on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.
>>
>> The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling
>> the community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using many
>> if not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 open
>> spots at any given time or maybe even fewer if there are events/meetings
>> going on at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose room, training room
>> or School business office.
>>
>> I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in
>> Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors.
>> I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes
>> with so many restrictions/limitations.
>>
>> Peter Buchthal
>> 71 Weston Rd
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for
>>> one, don't.
>>>
>>> In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building
>>> project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the
>>> project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris,
>>> perhaps well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and
>>> design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.
>>>
>>> To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but
>>> believe that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to
>>> increase and the impact of the project diminished.
>>>
>>> I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their
>>> recommendation.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal 
>>> wrote:
>>>

 People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't
 believe this building project is about accepting our responsibility for
 taking care of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to
 97 and was a big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently
 believe that if one does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't
 support our Council on Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.

 Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on
 Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do
 not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with
 the school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to
 build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient
 parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and
 school age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot
 mishaps.  I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that
 intentionally colocates a 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-29 Thread melinda bruno-smith
Agreed.

Sent from my iPhone
Melinda Bruno-Smith




On Sep 29, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Magruder Donaldson  wrote:


There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
Craig Donaldson

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal 
mailto:pbucht...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a declining 
school population.  The architect and school administration at the time told us 
the building was designed for 650 students.  More recently, the school 
architects publicly told fellow architects that the school was designed for 700 
students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 
grades have enough students for 4 simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state 
education sizing guidelines for a new school, our 165,000 square feet should 
support over 1000 students.

It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain facts.

What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them as I 
believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't be 
accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  at 
Hartwell because of the parking, traffic and safety concerns.  The new 
community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 to 2:30 on 
M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.

The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling the 
community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using many if not 
most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 open spots at any 
given time or maybe even fewer if there are events/meetings going on at the 
main Hartwell building's multi purpose room, training room or School business 
office.

I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in Hartwell 
for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors. I  just 
don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes with so many 
restrictions/limitations.

Peter Buchthal
71 Weston Rd

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson 
mailto:johntmendel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for one, 
don't.

In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building 
project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the project 
in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris, perhaps 
well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and design, 
concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.

To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but believe 
that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to increase and the 
impact of the project diminished.

I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their 
recommendation.

John

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal 
mailto:pbucht...@gmail.com>> wrote:

People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't believe 
this building project is about accepting our responsibility for taking care of 
our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to 97 and was a big 
user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently believe that if one does 
not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't support our Council on Aging and 
its mission.  This is far from the truth.

Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on Aging 
Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do not want 
to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with the school. 
There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to build a 
COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient parking and 
limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and school age (5+)  
dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot mishaps.  I am also 
not aware of any community center anywhere that  intentionally colocates a 
senior center and  daycare using a small shared parking lot.

Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge 
building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis Hall.

As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita debt in 
the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes and many 
voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't listened to the 
public's concerns.

In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have 
previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it belongs.  
Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings within the school 
as the hours of a school and after school program dovetail perfectly.  Maybe we 
should ask our new Superintendent if he could house Leap within the school?

Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project is under 
construction?

Peter Buchthal
71 Weston Rd

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-29 Thread Magruder Donaldson
There must be a way to accommodate LEAP in the new, spacious school…
Craig Donaldson

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:03 PM Peter Buchthal  wrote:

> The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a
> declining school population.  The architect and school administration at
> the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More
> recently, the school architects publicly told fellow architects that the
> school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate
> classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4
> simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines
> for a new school, our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000
> students.
>
> It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain
> facts.
>
> What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them
> as I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't be
> accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  at
> Hartwell because of the parking, traffic and safety concerns.  The new
> community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 to 2:30
> on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.
>
> The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling
> the community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using many
> if not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 open
> spots at any given time or maybe even fewer if there are events/meetings
> going on at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose room, training room
> or School business office.
>
> I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in
> Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors.
> I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes
> with so many restrictions/limitations.
>
> Peter Buchthal
> 71 Weston Rd
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson 
> wrote:
>
>> You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for
>> one, don't.
>>
>> In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building
>> project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the
>> project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris,
>> perhaps well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and
>> design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.
>>
>> To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but
>> believe that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to
>> increase and the impact of the project diminished.
>>
>> I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their
>> recommendation.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't
>>> believe this building project is about accepting our responsibility for
>>> taking care of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to
>>> 97 and was a big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently
>>> believe that if one does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't
>>> support our Council on Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.
>>>
>>> Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on
>>> Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do
>>> not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with
>>> the school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to
>>> build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient
>>> parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and
>>> school age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot
>>> mishaps.  I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that
>>> intentionally colocates a senior center and  daycare using a small shared
>>> parking lot.
>>>
>>> Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a
>>> huge building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at
>>> Bemis Hall.
>>>
>>> As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita
>>> debt in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes
>>> and many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't
>>> listened to the public's concerns.
>>>
>>> In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have
>>> previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it
>>> belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings
>>> within the school as the hours of a school and after school program
>>> dovetail perfectly.  Maybe we should ask our new Superintendent if he could
>>> house Leap within the school?
>>>
>>> Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project
>>> is under construction?
>>>
>>> Peter Buchthal
>>> 71 Weston 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-28 Thread Peter Buchthal
The school is too big by any standard.  We have 550 students with a
declining school population.  The architect and school administration at
the time told us the building was designed for 650 students.  More
recently, the school architects publicly told fellow architects that the
school was designed for 700 students.  9 grades (k-8) each have 4 separate
classrooms.   Only 2 of the 7 grades have enough students for 4
simultaneous classrooms.  Applying the state education sizing guidelines
for a new school, our 165,000 square feet should support over 1000
students.

It would be helpful to our discussion if people can agree on certain
facts.

What exactly do people like about Plans A, B or C?   I like none of them as
I believe the premise of intergenerational mingling  as a goal  won't be
accomplished with the limited available hours for senior programming  at
Hartwell because of the parking, traffic and safety concerns.  The new
community center will have senior programming by design only from 9 to 2:30
on M, Tu, Th, Fr and 9 to 12 on Wed.

The CCBC presents parking as ample with 50 spots nearby without telling the
community that the current users of Hartwell may already be using many if
not most of the 50 nearby spots.  So, we may only have 5 to 10 open spots
at any given time or maybe even fewer if there are events/meetings going on
at the main Hartwell building's multi purpose room, training room or School
business office.

I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in
Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors.
I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes
with so many restrictions/limitations.

Peter Buchthal
71 Weston Rd

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson 
wrote:

> You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for
> one, don't.
>
> In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building
> project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the
> project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris,
> perhaps well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and
> design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.
>
> To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but
> believe that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to
> increase and the impact of the project diminished.
>
> I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their
> recommendation.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't
>> believe this building project is about accepting our responsibility for
>> taking care of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to
>> 97 and was a big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently
>> believe that if one does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't
>> support our Council on Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.
>>
>> Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on
>> Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do
>> not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with
>> the school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to
>> build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient
>> parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and
>> school age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot
>> mishaps.  I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that
>> intentionally colocates a senior center and  daycare using a small shared
>> parking lot.
>>
>> Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge
>> building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis
>> Hall.
>>
>> As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita
>> debt in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes
>> and many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't
>> listened to the public's concerns.
>>
>> In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have
>> previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it
>> belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings
>> within the school as the hours of a school and after school program
>> dovetail perfectly.  Maybe we should ask our new Superintendent if he could
>> house Leap within the school?
>>
>> Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project is
>> under construction?
>>
>> Peter Buchthal
>> 71 Weston Rd
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln <
>> lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and
>>> tolerance would further not doing the right thing like providing a place
>>> for kids, adults 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-28 Thread Dennis Picker
At Special Town Meeting last year, I opened my comments by saying that I
recognized the need to spend money to address genuine needs that PRD and
COA/HS face.  I said that I was willing to pay taxes to address the needs.
I also said that I was against spending more to address aspirations that
were wants and not needs.

I have attended every CCBC meeting except one from mid January through mid
August and have made clear to that committee in public comments that I am
not advocating for "do nothing."  I have been making comments and
suggestions to the committee to try to ensure that a low-cost option which
addresses essential needs and leaves out unnecessary aspirations is
developed as a choice that is presented to the voters.

In the world in which I live, careful objective analysis, which often
involves numbers, is a way to understand what are the core needs.

If such a reasonable low cost option is offered, I will vote for it.

Dennis Picker, Page Rd


On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:34 PM Lis Herbert  wrote:

> I don’t believe for a second that numbers don’t matter — far from it.
>
> But I have no doubt that there is a vocal minority of people who seem to
> believe that by throwing numbers around — only the numbers they have seized
> upon as important — they give the impression that they must know what they
> are talking about, and should be taken seriously.
>
> The reality is that they won’t accept any level of public spending, even
> well-justified public spending for the greater good. And unfortunately, a
> not insignificant group of people seem to be buying into the argument
> because, I guess, “numbers”. There is a thin veil of credibility implied in
> what they are saying, and some people seem to be lapping it up — whether
> because they believe it, or they themselves want to punt this forever, too,
> and the charts and numbers make them feel like they are making a reasoned
> decision.
>
> Numbers do matter. And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay,
> and I believe them.
>
> Lis
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 27, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Edward Young  wrote:
>
> 
> The idea that someone would advocate that the residents of Lincoln should
> pay millions of dollars of their money to a construction project on the
> basis of vague aspirations about “values and beliefs", without a close look
> at the relevant facts -- including the relevant numbers -- is so mind
> boggling that words fail me.
>
>
> Message: 24
> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 19:04:53 -0400
> From: Lis Herbert 
> To: Lynne Smith 
> Cc: Dennis Picker , Lincoln
> 
> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations
> Message-ID:
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I'm sorry, but the hair-splitting -- 13,000 vs. 11,400 sq. ft. -- so clouds
> the discussion that it becomes meaningless, especially when there is a
> suggestion to make up that 1,600 sq. ft. with other spaces in town. Aren't
> there administrative costs -- time and staffing -- associated with that way
> of thinking? What is gained by slimming things down by less than 10%?
>
> I've read through these threads, and the numbers -- oh my god the numbers.
> When I listened to a podcast this week from the London Review of Books
> related to this piece (which I urge you to read)
> <https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n18/john-lanchester/get-a-rabbit> all
> I could think of was the Community Center, and the discussions that go
> round and round about the usage, the square footage, the justification (or
> not) for those numbers, the need to survey further, the need to start
> again, etc. To quote Mr. Lanchester:
>
> Discussions that were once about values and beliefs ? about what a society
> wants to see when it looks at itself in the mirror ? have increasingly
> turned to arguments about numbers, data, statistics.
>
>
> And:
>
> As the House of Commons Treasury Committee said dryly in a 2016 report on
> the economic debate about EU membership, *?many of these claims sound
> factual because they use numbers.?*
>
>
> The idea that numbers convey credibility is nonsense. We are meant to
> believe that some people possess some level of numeracy that the rest of us
> can't, and that only they pay keen attention to stats and figures. And yet
> these same people really just don't want to see anything built, at all:
> some of them voted against the trimmed down, tiered budgets at the vote
> last winter, after loudly proclaiming by email (spewing numbers everywhere)
> that what we need are trimmed down, tiered budgets to choose from. This is
> not arguing in good faith, this is muddying the waters so people feel like
> they can't agree to anything.
>
> Outside Donelan's last weekend I heard a

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-28 Thread Carol Ryan
AgreeCarol Ryan Winter stSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 28, 2023, at 8:40 AM, Lynne Smith  wrote:What Dennis said! I agree with him.Lynne Smith5 Tabor Hill RoadLincoln, MA 01773781-258-1175Sent from my iPhoneOn 28 Sep 2023, at 8:26 a.m., Dennis Picker  wrote:At Special Town Meeting last year, I opened my comments by saying that I recognized the need to spend money to address genuine needs that PRD and COA/HS face.  I said that I was willing to pay taxes to address the needs.  I also said that I was against spending more to address aspirations that were wants and not needs.I have attended every CCBC meeting except one from mid January through mid August and have made clear to that committee in public comments that I am not advocating for "do nothing."  I have been making comments and suggestions to the committee to try to ensure that a low-cost option which addresses essential needs and leaves out unnecessary aspirations is developed as a choice that is presented to the voters.In the world in which I live, careful objective analysis, which often involves numbers, is a way to understand what are the core needs.If such a reasonable low cost option is offered, I will vote for it.Dennis Picker, Page RdOn Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:34 PM Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com> wrote:I don’t believe for a second that numbers don’t matter — far from it. But I have no doubt that there is a vocal minority of people who seem to believe that by throwing numbers around — only the numbers they have seized upon as important — they give the impression that they must know what they are talking about, and should be taken seriously. The reality is that they won’t accept any level of public spending, even well-justified public spending for the greater good. And unfortunately, a not insignificant group of people seem to be buying into the argument because, I guess, “numbers”. There is a thin veil of credibility implied in what they are saying, and some people seem to be lapping it up — whether because they believe it, or they themselves want to punt this forever, too, and the charts and numbers make them feel like they are making a reasoned decision.Numbers do matter. And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay, and I believe them.LisSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Edward Young <nedyoun...@icloud.com> wrote:The idea that someone would advocate that the residents of Lincoln should pay millions of dollars of their money to a construction project on the basis of vague aspirations about “values and beliefs", without a close look at the relevant facts -- including the relevant numbers -- is so mind boggling that words fail me.Message: 24Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 19:04:53 -0400From: Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com>To: Lynne Smith <ly...@smith.net>Cc: Dennis Picker <dennis.pick...@gmail.com>, Lincoln	<lincoln@lincolntalk.org>Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerationsMessage-ID:	<CA+LeGX1Oe7XTQxNKfa6L_f1e-64iB5r30=jub8eaxvmmqa8...@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"I'm sorry, but the hair-splitting -- 13,000 vs. 11,400 sq. ft. -- so cloudsthe discussion that it becomes meaningless, especially when there is asuggestion to make up that 1,600 sq. ft. with other spaces in town. Aren'tthere administrative costs -- time and staffing -- associated with that wayof thinking? What is gained by slimming things down by less than 10%?I've read through these threads, and the numbers -- oh my god the numbers.When I listened to a podcast this week from the London Review of Booksrelated to this piece (which I urge you to read)<https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n18/john-lanchester/get-a-rabbit> allI could think of was the Community Center, and the discussions that goround and round about the usage, the square footage, the justification (ornot) for those numbers, the need to survey further, the need to startagain, etc. To quote Mr. Lanchester:Discussions that were once about values and beliefs ? about what a societywants to see when it looks at itself in the mirror ? have increasinglyturned to arguments about numbers, data, statistics.And:As the House of Commons Treasury Committee said dryly in a 2016 report onthe economic debate about EU membership, *?many of these claims soundfactual because they use numbers.?*The idea that numbers convey credibility is nonsense. We are meant tobelieve that some people possess some level of numeracy that the rest of uscan't, and that only they pay keen attention to stats and figures. And yetthese same people really just don't want to see anything built, at all:some of them voted against the trimmed down, tiered budgets at the votelast winter, after loudly proclaiming by email (spewing numbers everywhere)that what we need are trimmed down, tiered budgets to choose from. This isnot arguing in good faith, this is muddying the waters so people feel likethey can't agree to anything.Outsid

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-28 Thread Lynne Smith
What Dennis said! I agree with him.Lynne Smith5 Tabor Hill RoadLincoln, MA 01773781-258-1175Sent from my iPhoneOn 28 Sep 2023, at 8:26 a.m., Dennis Picker  wrote:At Special Town Meeting last year, I opened my comments by saying that I recognized the need to spend money to address genuine needs that PRD and COA/HS face.  I said that I was willing to pay taxes to address the needs.  I also said that I was against spending more to address aspirations that were wants and not needs.I have attended every CCBC meeting except one from mid January through mid August and have made clear to that committee in public comments that I am not advocating for "do nothing."  I have been making comments and suggestions to the committee to try to ensure that a low-cost option which addresses essential needs and leaves out unnecessary aspirations is developed as a choice that is presented to the voters.In the world in which I live, careful objective analysis, which often involves numbers, is a way to understand what are the core needs.If such a reasonable low cost option is offered, I will vote for it.Dennis Picker, Page RdOn Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:34 PM Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com> wrote:I don’t believe for a second that numbers don’t matter — far from it. But I have no doubt that there is a vocal minority of people who seem to believe that by throwing numbers around — only the numbers they have seized upon as important — they give the impression that they must know what they are talking about, and should be taken seriously. The reality is that they won’t accept any level of public spending, even well-justified public spending for the greater good. And unfortunately, a not insignificant group of people seem to be buying into the argument because, I guess, “numbers”. There is a thin veil of credibility implied in what they are saying, and some people seem to be lapping it up — whether because they believe it, or they themselves want to punt this forever, too, and the charts and numbers make them feel like they are making a reasoned decision.Numbers do matter. And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay, and I believe them.LisSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Edward Young <nedyoun...@icloud.com> wrote:The idea that someone would advocate that the residents of Lincoln should pay millions of dollars of their money to a construction project on the basis of vague aspirations about “values and beliefs", without a close look at the relevant facts -- including the relevant numbers -- is so mind boggling that words fail me.Message: 24Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 19:04:53 -0400From: Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com>To: Lynne Smith <ly...@smith.net>Cc: Dennis Picker <dennis.pick...@gmail.com>, Lincoln	<lincoln@lincolntalk.org>Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerationsMessage-ID:	<CA+LeGX1Oe7XTQxNKfa6L_f1e-64iB5r30=jub8eaxvmmqa8...@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"I'm sorry, but the hair-splitting -- 13,000 vs. 11,400 sq. ft. -- so cloudsthe discussion that it becomes meaningless, especially when there is asuggestion to make up that 1,600 sq. ft. with other spaces in town. Aren'tthere administrative costs -- time and staffing -- associated with that wayof thinking? What is gained by slimming things down by less than 10%?I've read through these threads, and the numbers -- oh my god the numbers.When I listened to a podcast this week from the London Review of Booksrelated to this piece (which I urge you to read)<https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n18/john-lanchester/get-a-rabbit> allI could think of was the Community Center, and the discussions that goround and round about the usage, the square footage, the justification (ornot) for those numbers, the need to survey further, the need to startagain, etc. To quote Mr. Lanchester:Discussions that were once about values and beliefs ? about what a societywants to see when it looks at itself in the mirror ? have increasinglyturned to arguments about numbers, data, statistics.And:As the House of Commons Treasury Committee said dryly in a 2016 report onthe economic debate about EU membership, *?many of these claims soundfactual because they use numbers.?*The idea that numbers convey credibility is nonsense. We are meant tobelieve that some people possess some level of numeracy that the rest of uscan't, and that only they pay keen attention to stats and figures. And yetthese same people really just don't want to see anything built, at all:some of them voted against the trimmed down, tiered budgets at the votelast winter, after loudly proclaiming by email (spewing numbers everywhere)that what we need are trimmed down, tiered budgets to choose from. This isnot arguing in good faith, this is muddying the waters so people feel likethey can't agree to anything.Outside Donelan's last weekend I heard a woman tell CCBC volunteers "I onlyknow we're going to be

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread John F. Carr
This is not the first time I've heard lost state funding for the school
mentioned as a reason to move quickly on the new building project.
My understanding is there is no state funding at stake now.

I will vote to kick the can down the road.  I don't want a white elephant.
If the cost will double, triple, quadruple next year I don't want one next
year either.  Office space occupancy is trending down in the Boston
suburbs.  That means rents should be dropping.  If our buildings collapse
we can find a place to put our seniors that is better than an ice floe.

I would support a modest building near the train station.  I expect
the choice before voters to be between very expensive and nothing at all.
It's basic marketing.  You offer a $50 million diamond-studded temple,
a $40 million gold-plated temple, and a $30 million tent with no sides.
People are drawn to the middle choice and think they saved $10 million.

John Carr

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:59 AM John Mendelson
 wrote:
>
> You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for one, 
> don't.
>
> In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building 
> project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the 
> project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris, 
> perhaps well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and 
> design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.
>
> To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but believe 
> that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to increase and the 
> impact of the project diminished.
>
> I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their 
> recommendation.
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal  wrote:
>>
>>
>> People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't believe 
>> this building project is about accepting our responsibility for taking care 
>> of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to 97 and was a 
>> big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently believe that if one 
>> does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't support our Council on 
>> Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.
>>
>> Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on 
>> Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do 
>> not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with 
>> the school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to 
>> build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient 
>> parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and school 
>> age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot mishaps.  
>> I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that  intentionally 
>> colocates a senior center and  daycare using a small shared parking lot.
>>
>> Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge 
>> building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis Hall.
>>
>> As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita debt 
>> in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes and 
>> many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't listened 
>> to the public's concerns.
>>
>> In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have 
>> previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it 
>> belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings 
>> within the school as the hours of a school and after school program dovetail 
>> perfectly.  Maybe we should ask our new Superintendent if he could house 
>> Leap within the school?
>>
>> Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project is 
>> under construction?
>>
>> Peter Buchthal
>> 71 Weston Rd
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln 
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance 
>>> would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, 
>>> adults and elders should be able to congregate.
>>>
>>> It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for 
>>> past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids 
>>> would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where 
>>> adults could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they 
>>> move back home.
>>>
>>> This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of 
>>> intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was 
>>> provided to them.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> John Gregg
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Lis Herbert
Thank you for explaining town governance to me.Sent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 7:08 PM, Edward Young  wrote:"And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay, and I believe them."No, actually, the number crunchers say what the numbers are, and then the voters say what’s okay.On Sep 27, 2023, at 6:34 PM, Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com> wrote:I don’t believe for a second that numbers don’t matter — far from it. But I have no doubt that there is a vocal minority of people who seem to believe that by throwing numbers around — only the numbers they have seized upon as important — they give the impression that they must know what they are talking about, and should be taken seriously. The reality is that they won’t accept any level of public spending, even well-justified public spending for the greater good. And unfortunately, a not insignificant group of people seem to be buying into the argument because, I guess, “numbers”. There is a thin veil of credibility implied in what they are saying, and some people seem to be lapping it up — whether because they believe it, or they themselves want to punt this forever, too, and the charts and numbers make them feel like they are making a reasoned decision.Numbers do matter. And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay, and I believe them.LisSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Edward Young <nedyoun...@icloud.com> wrote:The idea that someone would advocate that the residents of Lincoln should pay millions of dollars of their money to a construction project on the basis of vague aspirations about “values and beliefs", without a close look at the relevant facts -- including the relevant numbers -- is so mind boggling that words fail me.Message: 24Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 19:04:53 -0400From: Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com>To: Lynne Smith <ly...@smith.net>Cc: Dennis Picker <dennis.pick...@gmail.com>, Lincoln	<lincoln@lincolntalk.org>Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerationsMessage-ID:	<CA+LeGX1Oe7XTQxNKfa6L_f1e-64iB5r30=jub8eaxvmmqa8...@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"I'm sorry, but the hair-splitting -- 13,000 vs. 11,400 sq. ft. -- so cloudsthe discussion that it becomes meaningless, especially when there is asuggestion to make up that 1,600 sq. ft. with other spaces in town. Aren'tthere administrative costs -- time and staffing -- associated with that wayof thinking? What is gained by slimming things down by less than 10%?I've read through these threads, and the numbers -- oh my god the numbers.When I listened to a podcast this week from the London Review of Booksrelated to this piece (which I urge you to read)<https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n18/john-lanchester/get-a-rabbit> allI could think of was the Community Center, and the discussions that goround and round about the usage, the square footage, the justification (ornot) for those numbers, the need to survey further, the need to startagain, etc. To quote Mr. Lanchester:Discussions that were once about values and beliefs ? about what a societywants to see when it looks at itself in the mirror ? have increasinglyturned to arguments about numbers, data, statistics.And:As the House of Commons Treasury Committee said dryly in a 2016 report onthe economic debate about EU membership, *?many of these claims soundfactual because they use numbers.?*The idea that numbers convey credibility is nonsense. We are meant tobelieve that some people possess some level of numeracy that the rest of uscan't, and that only they pay keen attention to stats and figures. And yetthese same people really just don't want to see anything built, at all:some of them voted against the trimmed down, tiered budgets at the votelast winter, after loudly proclaiming by email (spewing numbers everywhere)that what we need are trimmed down, tiered budgets to choose from. This isnot arguing in good faith, this is muddying the waters so people feel likethey can't agree to anything.Outside Donelan's last weekend I heard a woman tell CCBC volunteers "I onlyknow we're going to be screwed". Really? How can anybody feel good aboutconvincing people (or trying to convince people) of things that simplyaren't true? And should a decades-long initiative be scuttled because thenumbers are off a little bit, because a few years have gone by and thingshave changed, or population has shifted, or or or?? What happens when yousurvey people again, and the slow churn of committees and bureaucracy meansthat new number is outdated? (Hint: that's the point of the exercise.)And has anybody bothered to ask how many people don't take advantage ofthese programs -- all of them -- because the facilities aren't up to par,accessible, pleasant, etc.? That is a number worth talking about.Lis-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.ne

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Lis Herbert
I don’t believe for a second that numbers don’t matter — far from it. But I have no doubt that there is a vocal minority of people who seem to believe that by throwing numbers around — only the numbers they have seized upon as important — they give the impression that they must know what they are talking about, and should be taken seriously. The reality is that they won’t accept any level of public spending, even well-justified public spending for the greater good. And unfortunately, a not insignificant group of people seem to be buying into the argument because, I guess, “numbers”. There is a thin veil of credibility implied in what they are saying, and some people seem to be lapping it up — whether because they believe it, or they themselves want to punt this forever, too, and the charts and numbers make them feel like they are making a reasoned decision.Numbers do matter. And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay, and I believe them.LisSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Edward Young  wrote:The idea that someone would advocate that the residents of Lincoln should pay millions of dollars of their money to a construction project on the basis of vague aspirations about “values and beliefs", without a close look at the relevant facts -- including the relevant numbers -- is so mind boggling that words fail me.Message: 24Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 19:04:53 -0400From: Lis Herbert <lisherb...@gmail.com>To: Lynne Smith <ly...@smith.net>Cc: Dennis Picker <dennis.pick...@gmail.com>, Lincoln	<lincoln@lincolntalk.org>Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerationsMessage-ID:	<CA+LeGX1Oe7XTQxNKfa6L_f1e-64iB5r30=jub8eaxvmmqa8...@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"I'm sorry, but the hair-splitting -- 13,000 vs. 11,400 sq. ft. -- so cloudsthe discussion that it becomes meaningless, especially when there is asuggestion to make up that 1,600 sq. ft. with other spaces in town. Aren'tthere administrative costs -- time and staffing -- associated with that wayof thinking? What is gained by slimming things down by less than 10%?I've read through these threads, and the numbers -- oh my god the numbers.When I listened to a podcast this week from the London Review of Booksrelated to this piece (which I urge you to read)<https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n18/john-lanchester/get-a-rabbit> allI could think of was the Community Center, and the discussions that goround and round about the usage, the square footage, the justification (ornot) for those numbers, the need to survey further, the need to startagain, etc. To quote Mr. Lanchester:Discussions that were once about values and beliefs ? about what a societywants to see when it looks at itself in the mirror ? have increasinglyturned to arguments about numbers, data, statistics.And:As the House of Commons Treasury Committee said dryly in a 2016 report onthe economic debate about EU membership, *?many of these claims soundfactual because they use numbers.?*The idea that numbers convey credibility is nonsense. We are meant tobelieve that some people possess some level of numeracy that the rest of uscan't, and that only they pay keen attention to stats and figures. And yetthese same people really just don't want to see anything built, at all:some of them voted against the trimmed down, tiered budgets at the votelast winter, after loudly proclaiming by email (spewing numbers everywhere)that what we need are trimmed down, tiered budgets to choose from. This isnot arguing in good faith, this is muddying the waters so people feel likethey can't agree to anything.Outside Donelan's last weekend I heard a woman tell CCBC volunteers "I onlyknow we're going to be screwed". Really? How can anybody feel good aboutconvincing people (or trying to convince people) of things that simplyaren't true? And should a decades-long initiative be scuttled because thenumbers are off a little bit, because a few years have gone by and thingshave changed, or population has shifted, or or or?? What happens when yousurvey people again, and the slow churn of committees and bureaucracy meansthat new number is outdated? (Hint: that's the point of the exercise.)And has anybody bothered to ask how many people don't take advantage ofthese programs -- all of them -- because the facilities aren't up to par,accessible, pleasant, etc.? That is a number worth talking about.Lis-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Edward Young via Lincoln
> "And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay, and I believe them."

No, actually, the number crunchers say what the numbers are, and then the 
voters say what’s okay.


On Sep 27, 2023, at 6:34 PM, Lis Herbert  wrote:
> 
> I don’t believe for a second that numbers don’t matter — far from it. 
> 
> But I have no doubt that there is a vocal minority of people who seem to 
> believe that by throwing numbers around — only the numbers they have seized 
> upon as important — they give the impression that they must know what they 
> are talking about, and should be taken seriously. 
> 
> The reality is that they won’t accept any level of public spending, even 
> well-justified public spending for the greater good. And unfortunately, a not 
> insignificant group of people seem to be buying into the argument because, I 
> guess, “numbers”. There is a thin veil of credibility implied in what they 
> are saying, and some people seem to be lapping it up — whether because they 
> believe it, or they themselves want to punt this forever, too, and the charts 
> and numbers make them feel like they are making a reasoned decision.
> 
> Numbers do matter. And to that point: the number crunchers say it’s okay, and 
> I believe them.
> 
> Lis
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Sep 27, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Edward Young  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> The idea that someone would advocate that the residents of Lincoln should 
>> pay millions of dollars of their money to a construction project on the 
>> basis of vague aspirations about “values and beliefs", without a close look 
>> at the relevant facts -- including the relevant numbers -- is so mind 
>> boggling that words fail me.
>> 
>> 
>> Message: 24
>> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 19:04:53 -0400
>> From: Lis Herbert mailto:lisherb...@gmail.com>>
>> To: Lynne Smith mailto:ly...@smith.net>>
>> Cc: Dennis Picker > <mailto:dennis.pick...@gmail.com>>, Lincoln
>>  mailto:lincoln@lincolntalk.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations
>> Message-ID:
>>  > <mailto:CA+LeGX1Oe7XTQxNKfa6L_f1e-64iB5r30=jub8eaxvmmqa8...@mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> I'm sorry, but the hair-splitting -- 13,000 vs. 11,400 sq. ft. -- so clouds
>> the discussion that it becomes meaningless, especially when there is a
>> suggestion to make up that 1,600 sq. ft. with other spaces in town. Aren't
>> there administrative costs -- time and staffing -- associated with that way
>> of thinking? What is gained by slimming things down by less than 10%?
>> 
>> I've read through these threads, and the numbers -- oh my god the numbers.
>> When I listened to a podcast this week from the London Review of Books
>> related to this piece (which I urge you to read)
>> <https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n18/john-lanchester/get-a-rabbit 
>> <https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n18/john-lanchester/get-a-rabbit>> all
>> I could think of was the Community Center, and the discussions that go
>> round and round about the usage, the square footage, the justification (or
>> not) for those numbers, the need to survey further, the need to start
>> again, etc. To quote Mr. Lanchester:
>> 
>> Discussions that were once about values and beliefs ? about what a society
>> wants to see when it looks at itself in the mirror ? have increasingly
>> turned to arguments about numbers, data, statistics.
>> 
>> 
>> And:
>> 
>> As the House of Commons Treasury Committee said dryly in a 2016 report on
>> the economic debate about EU membership, *?many of these claims sound
>> factual because they use numbers.?*
>> 
>> 
>> The idea that numbers convey credibility is nonsense. We are meant to
>> believe that some people possess some level of numeracy that the rest of us
>> can't, and that only they pay keen attention to stats and figures. And yet
>> these same people really just don't want to see anything built, at all:
>> some of them voted against the trimmed down, tiered budgets at the vote
>> last winter, after loudly proclaiming by email (spewing numbers everywhere)
>> that what we need are trimmed down, tiered budgets to choose from. This is
>> not arguing in good faith, this is muddying the waters so people feel like
>> they can't agree to anything.
>> 
>> Outside Donelan's last weekend I heard a woman tell CCBC volunteers "I only
>> know we're going to be screwed". Really? How can anybody feel good about
>> convincing people (or trying to convince peo

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Carol Ryan
I would also like to dispute “build it and they will come”. This has never been evident at the many wonderful public facilities in Lincoln and our neighboring towns. We have many opportunities for meet ups and chance encounters already. You just have to get out of your car.I encourage people to look around and discover what surrounds us.Weston AIC and The Beede Center, beautiful libraries in every town, museums and parks which are free to the public like The Rose Art Museum at Brandeis and The Lyman Estate Greenhouse. All these places are nearby and in my experience are never crowded. Please share a few of your favorites.Thanks, Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 3:06 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:I don’t think being fiscally responsible is “ cheaping out”.  IMHO that’s an entitled and bougie perspective that not every tax payer in Lincoln has the means to support.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 2:47 PM, Paul Shorb  wrote:I'm with john, Lis, Wendy, Katherine, and others in this thread and others in town who say: let's build a decent, attractive community center, don't cheap out.The arguments for it being located at Hartwell seem compelling. We have smart people on FinComm. They do NOT believe the town’s current debt is outrageous for a town this size. (In fact, I believe they have explained that too little debt compared to traditional metrics makes a town look bad - looks like it's underinvesting.) - Paul ShorbOn Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 1:48 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:Amen
--Sara Mattes


On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:23 PM, Margo Fisher-Martin  wrote:John,This is about affordability and what makes sense. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but there should be no public shaming - ever- regardless of one’s views.  This is not a tolerance or acceptance situation. This is a small town and we cannot always afford everything we want. Best,Cookie MartinOn Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln  wrote:I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, adults and elders should be able to congregate. 

It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where adults could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they move back home. 

This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was provided to them. 

Best Regards,
John Gregg
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Kathy Madison via Lincoln
I’ve just sent a query to FinComm re: how more indebtedness may affect 
Lincoln’s credit rating.

Also — while most are urging to build now because it’s likely more expensive 
later — consider interest rates now.
Cost of building materials are at an all-time high
It may end up being cheaper to wait.

It would be ironic if the cost of building a community center ended up forcing 
residents to leave town.

/ Kathy Madison


> On Sep 27, 2023, at 3:05 PM, Carol Ryan  wrote:
> 
> I don’t think being fiscally responsible is “ cheaping out”.  IMHO that’s an 
> entitled and bougie perspective that not every tax payer in Lincoln has the 
> means to support.
> Carol Ryan
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Sep 27, 2023, at 2:47 PM, Paul Shorb  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I'm with john, Lis, Wendy, Katherine, and others in this thread and others 
>> in town who say: let's build a decent, attractive community center, don't 
>> cheap out.
>> 
>> The arguments for it being located at Hartwell seem compelling. 
>> 
>> We have smart people on FinComm. They do NOT believe the town’s current debt 
>> is outrageous for a town this size. (In fact, I believe they have explained 
>> that too little debt compared to traditional metrics makes a town look bad - 
>> looks like it's underinvesting.) 
>> 
>> - Paul Shorb
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 1:48 PM Sara Mattes > > wrote:
>>> Amen
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sara Mattes
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:23 PM, Margo Fisher-Martin 
 mailto:margo.fisher.mar...@gmail.com>> 
 wrote:
 
 John,
 
 This is about affordability and what makes sense. Everyone is entitled to 
 an opinion, but there should be no public shaming - ever- regardless of 
 one’s views.  
 This is not a tolerance or acceptance situation. 
 This is a small town and we cannot always afford everything we want. 
 
 Best,
 Cookie Martin
 
 
 On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln 
 mailto:lincoln@lincolntalk.org>> wrote:
> I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and 
> tolerance would further not doing the right thing like providing a place 
> for kids, adults and elders should be able to congregate. 
> 
> It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for 
> past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids 
> would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where 
> adults could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if 
> they move back home. 
> 
> This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of 
> intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like 
> was provided to them. 
> 
> Best Regards,
> John Gregg
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
> .
> Browse the archives at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
 -- 
 The LincolnTalk mailing list.
 To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
 .
 Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
 Change your subscription settings at 
 https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>>> .
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Carol Ryan
I don’t think being fiscally responsible is “ cheaping out”.  IMHO that’s an entitled and bougie perspective that not every tax payer in Lincoln has the means to support.Carol RyanSent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 2:47 PM, Paul Shorb  wrote:I'm with john, Lis, Wendy, Katherine, and others in this thread and others in town who say: let's build a decent, attractive community center, don't cheap out.The arguments for it being located at Hartwell seem compelling. We have smart people on FinComm. They do NOT believe the town’s current debt is outrageous for a town this size. (In fact, I believe they have explained that too little debt compared to traditional metrics makes a town look bad - looks like it's underinvesting.) - Paul ShorbOn Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 1:48 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:Amen
--Sara Mattes


On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:23 PM, Margo Fisher-Martin  wrote:John,This is about affordability and what makes sense. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but there should be no public shaming - ever- regardless of one’s views.  This is not a tolerance or acceptance situation. This is a small town and we cannot always afford everything we want. Best,Cookie MartinOn Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln  wrote:I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, adults and elders should be able to congregate. 

It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where adults could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they move back home. 

This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was provided to them. 

Best Regards,
John Gregg
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Paul Shorb
I'm with john, Lis, Wendy, Katherine, and others in this thread and others
in town who say: let's build a decent, attractive community center, don't
cheap out.

The arguments for it being located at Hartwell seem compelling.

We have smart people on FinComm. They do NOT believe the town’s current
debt is outrageous for a town this size. (In fact, I believe they have
explained that too little debt compared to traditional metrics makes a town
look bad - looks like it's underinvesting.)

- Paul Shorb

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 1:48 PM Sara Mattes  wrote:

> Amen
>
> --
> Sara Mattes
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:23 PM, Margo Fisher-Martin <
> margo.fisher.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> This is about affordability and what makes sense. Everyone is entitled to
> an opinion, but there should be no public shaming - ever- regardless of
> one’s views.
> This is not a tolerance or acceptance situation.
> This is a small town and we cannot always afford everything we want.
>
> Best,
> Cookie Martin
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln <
> lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
>
>> I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and
>> tolerance would further not doing the right thing like providing a place
>> for kids, adults and elders should be able to congregate.
>>
>> It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for
>> past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids
>> would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where
>> adults could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they
>> move back home.
>>
>> This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of
>> intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was
>> provided to them.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> John Gregg
>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
> --
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/
> .
> Change your subscription settings at
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>
>
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Sara Mattes
Amen

--
Sara Mattes




> On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:23 PM, Margo Fisher-Martin 
>  wrote:
> 
> John,
> 
> This is about affordability and what makes sense. Everyone is entitled to an 
> opinion, but there should be no public shaming - ever- regardless of one’s 
> views.  
> This is not a tolerance or acceptance situation. 
> This is a small town and we cannot always afford everything we want. 
> 
> Best,
> Cookie Martin
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln 
> mailto:lincoln@lincolntalk.org>> wrote:
>> I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance 
>> would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, 
>> adults and elders should be able to congregate. 
>> 
>> It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for past 
>> neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids would 
>> be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where adults 
>> could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they move 
>> back home. 
>> 
>> This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of 
>> intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was 
>> provided to them. 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> John Gregg
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>> .
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Kathy Madison via Lincoln
So, if the call went out to all town groups about whether they’d like/need 
space, why wouldn’t they say, “yes” ?
The question of need and want did not seem so clearly defined.

My son was in LEAP during his school years in Lincoln (and before that in 
Brookline) — colocating such a program w/the school always seemed to make sense 
to me.
Now that there’s a nice, new, big school building in Lincoln, why wouldn’t LEAP 
fit there perfectly?
I understand the proposed CC would be essentially an “across campus walk” … but 
does it need to be?

If we take on even more debt now, will that mean the assessors will need to get 
busy so we can recover all the taxes that are not now being levied (because of 
under-assessed homes) and how will people feel about that?

Lincoln is a miniscule-sized town. It’s a beautiful, wonderful, rural breath of 
fresh air surrounded by lots of urban centers.
The town’s current debt is outrageous for a town this size. To add to it 
further seems unwise and unwarranted. 

To those who say — “But building a CC won’t get cheaper in the coming years.”
I say, “yes, that’s true, but at what point in time will our town's 
indebtedness be too high a price to pay?

Kathy Madison
781-640-1850


> On Sep 27, 2023, at 12:36 PM, Kathy Madison  wrote:
> 
> As I understand it, there was a town-wide query to sent to all the groups in 
> town asking whether they would use a community center.
> Apparently LEAP was one of the groups that said they’d like space.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sep 26, 2023, at 8:41 PM, Peter Buchthal  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't believe 
>> this building project is about accepting our responsibility for taking care 
>> of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to 97 and was a 
>> big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently believe that if one 
>> does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't support our Council on 
>> Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.  
>> 
>> Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on 
>> Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do 
>> not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with 
>> the school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to 
>> build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient 
>> parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and school 
>> age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot mishaps.  
>> I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that  intentionally 
>> colocates a senior center and  daycare using a small shared parking lot.   
>> 
>> Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge 
>> building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis 
>> Hall.   
>> 
>> As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita debt 
>> in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes and 
>> many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't listened 
>> to the public's concerns.  
>> 
>> In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have 
>> previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it 
>> belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings 
>> within the school as the hours of a school and after school program dovetail 
>> perfectly.  Maybe we should ask our new Superintendent if he could house 
>> Leap within the school? 
>> 
>> Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project is 
>> under construction?   
>> 
>> Peter Buchthal
>> 71 Weston Rd
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln 
>> mailto:lincoln@lincolntalk.org>> wrote:
>>> I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance 
>>> would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, 
>>> adults and elders should be able to congregate. 
>>> 
>>> It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for 
>>> past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids 
>>> would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where 
>>> adults could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they 
>>> move back home. 
>>> 
>>> This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of 
>>> intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was 
>>> provided to them. 
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> John Gregg
>>> -- 
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>>> .
>>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at 
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Maureen E Devlin
Agreed

On Sep 27, 2023, at 12:06 PM, Michael Dembowski  wrote:


Agreed

On Sep 27, 2023, at 11:47 AM, Laura Crosby  wrote:

Agreed.

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 27, 2023, at 10:59 AM, John Mendelson  wrote:


You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for one, 
don't.

In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building 
project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the project 
in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris, perhaps 
well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and design, 
concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.

To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but believe 
that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to increase and the 
impact of the project diminished.

I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their 
recommendation.

John

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal 
mailto:pbucht...@gmail.com>> wrote:

People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't believe 
this building project is about accepting our responsibility for taking care of 
our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to 97 and was a big 
user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently believe that if one does 
not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't support our Council on Aging and 
its mission.  This is far from the truth.

Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on Aging 
Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do not want 
to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with the school. 
There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to build a 
COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient parking and 
limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and school age (5+)  
dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot mishaps.  I am also 
not aware of any community center anywhere that  intentionally colocates a 
senior center and  daycare using a small shared parking lot.

Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge 
building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis Hall.

As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita debt in 
the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes and many 
voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't listened to the 
public's concerns.

In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have 
previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it belongs.  
Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings within the school 
as the hours of a school and after school program dovetail perfectly.  Maybe we 
should ask our new Superintendent if he could house Leap within the school?

Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project is under 
construction?

Peter Buchthal
71 Weston Rd

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln 
mailto:lincoln@lincolntalk.org>> wrote:
I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance 
would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, adults 
and elders should be able to congregate.

It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for past 
neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids would be 
provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where adults could 
allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they move back home.

This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of 
intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was 
provided to them.

Best Regards,
John Gregg
--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

--
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread John Mendelson
I probably lean toward option 3 at this point but could be swayed toward
option 2.  I'd add in the $150k for improving the bike path.

Hartwell is not perfect, but what site is?

I see the Hartwell site being very workable in the present and, if we can
build more multi-family housing around the station, improve the multi-use
roadside path along Lincoln Road, the site looks even better  over the next
10-20 year timeframe.  I'd love to move into a 2-bedroom condo at the
station when I am 75 and be able to dine downstairs, take the train into
Boston, and walk or bike to the community center along a smooth, wide path
separated from vehicular traffic.  I believe improving and further
developing the "institutional core" of our town from Bemis Hall to the
station is the best place to focus.  And I say that as someone who lives
along said corridor and who would feel the impacts, positive and negative,
directly.

John

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:02 PM Peter Buchthal  wrote:

> John,
>
> It would be helpful to our discussion if we can agree on certain facts.
>
> What exactly do you like about Plans A, B or C?
>
> I am afraid that the CCBC is sticking with a Community Center based in
> Hartwell for the wrong reasons.  The town has an obligation to its seniors.
> I  just don't want to build a core town building in a location that comes
> with so many restrictions/limitations.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:58 AM John Mendelson 
> wrote:
>
>> You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for
>> one, don't.
>>
>> In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building
>> project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the
>> project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris,
>> perhaps well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and
>> design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.
>>
>> To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but
>> believe that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to
>> increase and the impact of the project diminished.
>>
>> I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their
>> recommendation.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't
>>> believe this building project is about accepting our responsibility for
>>> taking care of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to
>>> 97 and was a big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently
>>> believe that if one does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't
>>> support our Council on Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.
>>>
>>> Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on
>>> Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do
>>> not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with
>>> the school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to
>>> build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient
>>> parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and
>>> school age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot
>>> mishaps.  I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that
>>> intentionally colocates a senior center and  daycare using a small shared
>>> parking lot.
>>>
>>> Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a
>>> huge building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at
>>> Bemis Hall.
>>>
>>> As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita
>>> debt in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes
>>> and many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't
>>> listened to the public's concerns.
>>>
>>> In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have
>>> previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it
>>> belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings
>>> within the school as the hours of a school and after school program
>>> dovetail perfectly.  Maybe we should ask our new Superintendent if he could
>>> house Leap within the school?
>>>
>>> Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project
>>> is under construction?
>>>
>>> Peter Buchthal
>>> 71 Weston Rd
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln <
>>> lincoln@lincolntalk.org> wrote:
>>>
 I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and
 tolerance would further not doing the right thing like providing a place
 for kids, adults and elders should be able to congregate.

 It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for
 past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids
 would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Kathy Madison via Lincoln
As I understand it, there was a town-wide query to sent to all the groups in 
town asking whether they would use a community center.
Apparently LEAP was one of the groups that said they’d like space.




> On Sep 26, 2023, at 8:41 PM, Peter Buchthal  wrote:
> 
> 
> People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't believe 
> this building project is about accepting our responsibility for taking care 
> of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to 97 and was a 
> big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently believe that if one 
> does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't support our Council on Aging 
> and its mission.  This is far from the truth.  
> 
> Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on Aging 
> Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do not want 
> to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with the 
> school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to build a 
> COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient parking and 
> limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and school age (5+)  
> dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot mishaps.  I am also 
> not aware of any community center anywhere that  intentionally colocates a 
> senior center and  daycare using a small shared parking lot.   
> 
> Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge 
> building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis Hall. 
>   
> 
> As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita debt 
> in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes and 
> many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't listened 
> to the public's concerns.  
> 
> In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have 
> previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it 
> belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings 
> within the school as the hours of a school and after school program dovetail 
> perfectly.  Maybe we should ask our new Superintendent if he could house Leap 
> within the school? 
> 
> Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project is 
> under construction?   
> 
> Peter Buchthal
> 71 Weston Rd
> 
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln 
> mailto:lincoln@lincolntalk.org>> wrote:
>> I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance 
>> would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, 
>> adults and elders should be able to congregate. 
>> 
>> It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for past 
>> neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids would 
>> be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where adults 
>> could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they move 
>> back home. 
>> 
>> This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of 
>> intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was 
>> provided to them. 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> John Gregg
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org 
>> .
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 

-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Katherine Walker
Well said, Lis!  Thank-you!

Katy and Tom Walker


On Sep 26, 2023, at 7:04 PM, Lis Herbert  wrote:


I'm sorry, but the hair-splitting -- 13,000 vs. 11,400 sq. ft. -- so clouds the 
discussion that it becomes meaningless, especially when there is a suggestion 
to make up that 1,600 sq. ft. with other spaces in town. Aren't there 
administrative costs -- time and staffing -- associated with that way of 
thinking? What is gained by slimming things down by less than 10%?

I've read through these threads, and the numbers -- oh my god the numbers. When 
I listened to a podcast this week from the London Review of Books related to 
this piece (which I urge you to 
read) all 
I could think of was the Community Center, and the discussions that go round 
and round about the usage, the square footage, the justification (or not) for 
those numbers, the need to survey further, the need to start again, etc. To 
quote Mr. Lanchester:

Discussions that were once about values and beliefs – about what a society 
wants to see when it looks at itself in the mirror – have increasingly turned 
to arguments about numbers, data, statistics.

And:

As the House of Commons Treasury Committee said dryly in a 2016 report on the 
economic debate about EU membership, ‘many of these claims sound factual 
because they use numbers.’

The idea that numbers convey credibility is nonsense. We are meant to believe 
that some people possess some level of numeracy that the rest of us can't, and 
that only they pay keen attention to stats and figures. And yet these same 
people really just don't want to see anything built, at all: some of them voted 
against the trimmed down, tiered budgets at the vote last winter, after loudly 
proclaiming by email (spewing numbers everywhere) that what we need are trimmed 
down, tiered budgets to choose from. This is not arguing in good faith, this is 
muddying the waters so people feel like they can't agree to anything.

Outside Donelan's last weekend I heard a woman tell CCBC volunteers "I only 
know we're going to be screwed". Really? How can anybody feel good about 
convincing people (or trying to convince people) of things that simply aren't 
true? And should a decades-long initiative be scuttled because the numbers are 
off a little bit, because a few years have gone by and things have changed, or 
population has shifted, or or or?? What happens when you survey people again, 
and the slow churn of committees and bureaucracy means that new number is 
outdated? (Hint: that's the point of the exercise.)

And has anybody bothered to ask how many people don't take advantage of these 
programs -- all of them -- because the facilities aren't up to par, accessible, 
pleasant, etc.? That is a number worth talking about.

Lis




On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 8:28 AM Lynne Smith 
mailto:ly...@smith.net>> wrote:
Dennis,

Thank you for your thoughtful discussion of the Community Center size.  I agree 
that the CCBC has not responded to the questions that many have been asking 
regarding space needs for existing programs.

The 13,000 sq ft space not including LEAP or Maintenance is clearly too much.  
In fact, I think the 11,400 sq ft proposed as a minimum by ICON is still too 
much. We could easily accommodate most programs with 10,000 sq ft on the 
Hartwell Campus, supplemented by use of space at Pierce House, Bemis Hall, 
First Parish Stone Church, and/or St Anne’s Church.

CCBC maintains that a single building offers many casual encounters: people 
coming for one activity run into people coming for another.  This may be true 
but I do not think it is justification for abandoning activities in the other 
lovely buildings with convenient parking that Lincoln uniquely offers.  I also 
agree that there is no reason a staff person has to be at off-site activities 
if the designated teacher or a COA volunteer will be present.

Lincoln needs to 'do something’ about the state of the COA/HS facility  but if 
the ‘something’ is too costly, I fear the Town will vote it down.  I still hope 
to see a really good option for the cost of $12.5 million. That amount probably 
cannot include LEAP so other funding must be ‘found’ for this school-related 
activity.



Lynne Smith
5 Tabor Hill Road
Lincoln, MA 01773
cell:  781-258-1175
ly...@smith.net



On Sep 25, 2023, at 7:30 PM, Dennis Picker 
mailto:dennis.pick...@gmail.com>> wrote:

The amount of finished interior space is a major driver of the cost of the 
proposed community center.  There are some who believe that even the bloated 
2018 proposal is not large enough. That design included yet another lecture 
hall (Bemis, the Learning Commons and the Brooks auditorium are not enough for 
a town of this size?),  a sound recording studio, an appliance fix-it shop, and 
facilities for cooking classes.

In May, 2023, ICON architects presented the CCBC with a trimmed down space 
proposal of 

Re: [LincolnTalk] Community Center- size considerations

2023-09-27 Thread Michael Dembowski
Agreed On Sep 27, 2023, at 11:47 AM, Laura Crosby  wrote:Agreed.Sent from my iPhoneOn Sep 27, 2023, at 10:59 AM, John Mendelson  wrote:You write as if everyone agrees the school has too much space.  I, for one, don't.  In my view, if there are lessons to be learned from the school building project, it is wise to examine the reasons why the town voted down the project in 2012, thereby rejecting $20.9 million in state funding.  Hubris, perhaps well-intentioned but overly wrought disagreements about site and design, concerns about cost?  Likely, all of the above.To my ear, this dialogue sounds very similar, and I cannot help but believe that if we kick this down the road, costs are only going to increase and the impact of the project diminished.I trust the work the CCBC has done and will very likely support their recommendation. JohnOn Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:22 AM Peter Buchthal  wrote:People of course are allowed to have their own opinions, but I don't believe this building project is about accepting our responsibility for taking care of our elders.  As I have mentioned before, my father lived to 97 and was a big user of his local Council on Aging.  You apparently believe that if one does not support the CCBC's decisions, you don't support our Council on Aging and its mission.  This is far from the truth.  Many on Lincoln Talk  and others in town simply question the Council on Aging Hartwell generous building space requirements.   Residents simply do not want to build a building that is bigger than our needs like we did with the school. There is also a healthy debate on whether it makes sense to build a COA/Community Center on the Hartwell Campus without sufficient parking and limited hours to protect the pre-school Magic Gardens and school age (5+)  dropoff/Pickup from automobile running child parking lot mishaps.  I am also not aware of any community center anywhere that  intentionally colocates a senior center and  daycare using a small shared parking lot.   Many on Lincoln Talk and the town would hate to see the town build a huge building that is underutilized and repeats the lack of parking at Bemis Hall.   As a small community with limited resources and the highest per capita debt in the commonwealth, we need to look at large projects with many eyes and many voices.  It is a shame that up to now, the CCBC really hasn't listened to the public's concerns.  In an effort to lower the cost and save between 3 and 4 million, I have previously asked why Leap can't be relocated into the school where it belongs.  Almost all other school districts have extended day offerings within the school as the hours of a school and after school program dovetail perfectly.  Maybe we should ask our new Superintendent if he could house Leap within the school? Does anyone know where Leap is going to run while the Hartwell Project is under construction?   Peter Buchthal71 Weston RdOn Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:03 PM john gregg via Lincoln  wrote:I am so surprised that a community that encourages acceptance and tolerance would further not doing the right thing like providing a place for kids, adults and elders should be able to congregate. 

It is about space, about money, about having to be held accountable for past neglect like providing a school for children. A place where the kids would be provided safe care at LEAP for parents who work. A place where adults could allow care for the ones who actually took care of them if they move back home. 

This is the same discussion when deciding about a new school, a bunch of intellectuals debating why things should not be provided to others like was provided to them. 

Best Regards,
John Gregg
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.


-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- The LincolnTalk mailing list.To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.



  1   2   3   4   >