I have. About six months ago so my memory is a little hazy. I ended up
opting not to go with EC2 because of them not being able to guarantee that
I would be able to keep the same IP.
Adam Howitt did a presentation on it.
You might want to look at right scale. They make the process as painless as
possible for setting up VM instances.
http://www.rightscale.com/m/
http://blog.synthasite.com/2007/08/14/scaling-on-amazon-with-rightscale/
There is a FF plugin for it as well (of course there is).
I know my entry is not for Railo but the directions I have posted could
easily be used to get Railo running on Jboss. I hope this helps introduce a
few people to Jboss Eclipse and their choice of CFML engines.
http://cfrant.blogspot.com/2008/03/jboss-eclipse-and-bluedragon.html
Adam Haskell
Thanx Adam. Jboss is a bit daunting at first. I am so used to Tomcat.
Everything seems to be popping up BD these days. We are all very excited
about this at our shop. We have using MM/Adobe CF for years and are taking a
*very* serious look at BD. We really want to move towards a Java platform.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Tanguy Rademakers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last year some Adobe fanboy was bitching out the NA list because the syntax
of the cfthread tag is different in BD 7 and CF 8
If you're talking about Peter Farrell's questions about cfthread (I
can't read the thread -
I would hardly describe Peter Farrell as an Adobe fanboy especially
since he was running his site for a long time on BlueDragon!
No, the person i was talking about is a certain Paul Vernon (NA's site is up,
just checked).
only to have it come to light that NA implemented cfthread before
See, that's exactly what i'm talking about. If another
company adds a feature *before* Adobe does, then how is it
not the responsibility of Adobe to maintain compatibility
when they themselves add the same feature? Should the other
company in question break backwards compatibility with
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2008, Tanguy Rademakers wrote:
atitude time and again in the CF community: when Adobe introduces new
syntax it's innovative, but when another vendor does it's disruptive. Last
Adobe 'own' CFML (the language). They can do what they like and still claim to
be 'compatable'.
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
See, that's exactly what i'm talking about. If another
company adds a feature *before* Adobe does, then how is it
not the responsibility of Adobe to maintain compatibility
when they themselves add the same feature? Should the other
company in
Adobe is not selling a CFML engine. Adobe is selling ColdFusion. Adobe
hasn't standardized CFML, and has no responsibility to any other vendor
selling CFML engines. You can argue that those other vendors likewise have
no responsibility to Adobe, and I'd agree, but if you build a product that
.
Regards
Dale Fraser
-Original Message-
From: Tanguy Rademakers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 March 2008 11:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
Adobe is not selling a CFML engine. Adobe is selling ColdFusion. Adobe
hasn't standardized CFML, and has
Nobody could argue that NA haven't made every reasonable
effort to ensure compatibility between BlueDragon and CFMX -
as you point out, that's the business they're in. But when
Adobe willingly breaks compatibility with BlueDragon by
implementing a BD feature in a non-compatible manner, i
: Tanguy Rademakers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:22:09 AM
Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
Adobe is not selling a CFML engine. Adobe is selling ColdFusion. Adobe
hasn't standardized CFML, and has no responsibility to any other vendor
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Tanguy Rademakers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, the person i was talking about is a certain Paul Vernon (NA's site is
up, just checked).
OK, I don't remember the thread then. I'll go read up on it.
See, that's exactly what i'm talking about. If another
for.
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon = open source
I remember last time I looked at the CF alternatives, BD was the only
one
that seemed mature. Others seemed to be either in early stages
On Wednesday 12 Mar 2008, Brad Wood wrote:
I sure hope I'm wrong-- I really do; but I think Successful Open
Sourced CF is a utopia many of us long for, but few of us would
actually get dirty for.
I'm not sure many of us have the depth of Java knowledge that would be
required.
See also
encourages people to use
a product when they can do that. I hope Adobe follows suit.
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:50 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
/*
/*On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:14
support, and even
then they're not done properly.
Just my $0.02.
RUss
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon = open source
I would suggest checking out MySQL and what they do
Sean Said:
Since Adobe (Macromedia / Allaire) created ColdFusion, I don't think they
have any responsibility to maintain compatibility since they created the
de facto standard. The burden is on other companies to build compatible CFML
engines, IMO. Nor do Adobe have any incentive to create a
]
/*Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:58 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: RE: Bluedragon = open source
/*
/* See, that's exactly what i'm talking about. If another
/* company adds a feature *before* Adobe does, then how is it
/* not the responsibility of Adobe to maintain compatibility
/* when they themselves
/*Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
/*
/*On Tuesday 11 Mar 2008, Tanguy Rademakers wrote:
/* atitude time and again in the CF community: when Adobe introduces new
/* syntax it's innovative, but when another vendor does it's disruptive.
/*Last
/*
/*Adobe 'own' CFML (the language). They can do what
I think there is more than a large enough market...one that could increase
with competition.
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Dale Fraser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:34 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: RE: Bluedragon = open source
/*
/*Seriously,
/*
/*Adobe
have seen it take days or weeks is if there is a serious issue that
involves a major bug in the code. That is why companies use paid support.
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 12:59 PM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: RE: Bluedragon
I would suggest checking out MySQL and what they do with it... The way
they do it...if you need support (and several other features not
available in the free version), you pay for licensing.
==
And pay you do! MySQL Enterprise Platinum is $4,999 USD
See that's the problem. Everyone is more than happy to jump on the band
wagon *after* there is a mature solution which is worth their time.
However, the chicken precedes the egg here, and the chicken is a
community of developers willing to put in months (or years) of work to
get a product to that
as opposed to a problem you were having with MySQL.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 2:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon = open source
On the consumer level, you are correct. Having worked
On Monday 10 Mar 2008, Jordan Michaels wrote:
You can tie J2EE servers into Apache. In fact, the Smith Project has a
simple step-by-step on how to do that with tomcat:
http://smithproject.org/doc_preinstall.cfm
As does Railo (which comes with the Resin J2EE server by default).
there's *NO
It's just another CFML engine with not quite the same features as
the 'offical' one.
Being open source isn't much one way or the other, tbh.
Well, if people want to add features that are missing, now they can.
And it's more than just another CFML engine - it will be the only mature CFML
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2008, Tanguy Rademakers wrote:
I think NA deserves a big warm hearted thank you from the whle CF
community for taking this step.
Oh, I say 'thanks', but I don't believe, for instance, it's going to speed the
inclusion of Remoteing (OpenAMF) into the product.
--
Tom
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Tanguy Rademakers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being open source isn't much one way or the other, tbh.
Well, if people want to add features that are missing, now they can.
But it will be up to New Atlanta and the BlueDragon Open Source
Steering Committee whether
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2008, Sean Corfield wrote:
source. Sure, you could modify your *own* copy to add features - but
that will just create lots of incompatible engines. Everyone will need
to work with the process, like Sun's JCP and all the other successful
Exactly.
We don't want someone adding
But it will be up to New Atlanta and the BlueDragon Open Source
Steering Committee whether your suggestions will be accepted. Open
source does not mean that everyone can just pile in and change the
source. Sure, you could modify your *own* copy to add features - but
that will just create lots of
Exactly.
We don't want someone adding cfFooBar to their engine, whilst
another uses
cfBarFoo (or doesn't have it at all). Ideally I can take a project
and run
it with no changes on Adobe, or Railo, or Smith, or BD, or ...
So i guess this means the CFML language is now set in stone
Let's give this announcement some link love!
http://www.dzone.com/links/open_source_cfml_engine_on_the_way.html
http://digg.com/software/New_Atlanta_announces_free_open_source_BlueDragon_edition
I'm sure there are others out there. Let's talk this up!
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Tanguy
, 2008 2:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
Exactly.
We don't want someone adding cfFooBar to their engine, whilst
another uses
cfBarFoo (or doesn't have it at all). Ideally I can take a project
and run
it with no changes on Adobe, or Railo, or Smith, or BD, or ...
So i
Isn't the point of this whole thing to spread the use of cfml, and to such
end, to have a cfml engine installed on every linux hosting company offering
PHP, wouldn't this be where the blue dragon open source version of their
product is going to be put to the test?
Every $5 a month hosting company
Isn't the point of this whole thing to spread the use of cfml, and to such
end, to have a cfml engine installed on every linux hosting company
offering
PHP, wouldn't this be where the blue dragon open source version of their
product is going to be put to the test?
Precisely, and I really do
If the above is truly their intention, this is HUGE for the CF
Community.
==
Trust me-- I am excited to see what this will bring too; however, if an
open source CFML engine is such a door-opener, then why hasn't everyone
jumped on the Smith Project and proliferated
be a
great thing IMHO.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 5:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Bluedragon = open source
If the above is truly their intention, this is HUGE for the CF
Community
JBoss has a regular web server in it. Its very easy to run BlueDragon for J2EE
on Apache. You will need a J2EE app server like JBoss to run BD. That said, its
relatively easy to integrate JBoss/BD with Apache. Steve Brownlee gives a very
good tutorial on this at
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Jordan Michaels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Precisely, and I really do hope that this is the case. The only caveat
would be how NA's Dual-Licensing would work - and that's why I'm really
anxious to see the details there.
I'm not sure what your concern is here?
Whats even more interesting is that announcement is from the future ;)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Brad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interesting:
http://www.newatlanta.com/corporate/news/bluedragon_opensource_announce.
More info here:
http://blog.newatlanta.com/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=EABF951D-453A-486E-9647E2825D1E6F39
(watch the wrap)
http://www.newatlanta.com/corporate/news/bluedragon_opensource_announce.
jsp
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
Dang it, you stole my comment!
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Aaron Rouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats even more interesting is that announcement is from the future ;)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Brad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interesting:
I am pumped.
One thing I did notice was it was the J2EE version. Which, if I understand
correctly, is the version that is deployed on a Java App server like TomCat
or JBoss and not a regular web server like Apache or IIS. Which is all
fine with me in that is the direction I am heading anyways.
You can tie J2EE servers into Apache. In fact, the Smith Project has a
simple step-by-step on how to do that with tomcat:
http://smithproject.org/doc_preinstall.cfm
I'm anxious to see the details of the new license agreements, as that
will be the determining factor into how it's used by hosting
sourcing it just to
get some free help with the development of the server.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Jordan Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 6:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
You can tie J2EE servers into Apache. In fact
The one thing I think I'm reading is that it's still not for commercial use.
If that's true, then it's really no better then the free bluedragon product
that they're currently offer. They seemed to be open sourcing it just to
get some free help with the development of the server.
Where did you
that
fairly easily decrypted?
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Tanguy Rademakers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
The one thing I think I'm reading is that it's still not for commercial
use.
If that's true
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
The one thing I think I'm reading is that it's still not for commercial
use.
If that's true, then it's really no better then the free bluedragon
product
that they're
can encrypt your code, but it's
that
fairly easily decrypted?
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Tanguy Rademakers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bluedragon = open source
The one thing I think I'm reading is that it's still
Very easy. IIRC you can do it with a CFX tag.
Let me clarify: Very easy for pre v. 7
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Gerald Guido [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--
I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to
do it.
- Pablo Picasso
Hi Matthew
You could of course use Railo, which in the Community Version is free
and has no restrictions in use. It doesn't matter if it's commercial or not.
Just give it a try.
Gert
Greetings from Switzerland
Gert Franz
Railo Technologies GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.railo.ch
Join our Mailing
Is the free version of the BlueDragon server local ip only?
No. BlueDragon 7 Server is free for multiuser applications. Any of the other
versions of BlueDragon 7 (BlueDragon 7.0 Server JX, BlueDragon 7.0 for J2EE
Application Servers, BlueDragon for the Microsoft .NET Framework) are not
free, but
Certainly multi-user, but I believe it is free only for non-commercial
applications. But don't take my word for it, ask on the newatalanta forum.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 10:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon Fee
Is the free version of the BlueDragon server local ip only?
No. BlueDragon 7 Server is free for multiuser applications.
Really? I've having a dickens of a time connecting to it from another computer.
I've got Smith set up on port 8081. My laptop is assigned a local subnet
address of
I can pull pages from the laptop itself
(localhost or 127.0.0.1) but if I try to use http://192.168.0.
5:8082/insert page here from another machine on the local area
network the page times out.
Ok - its late Friday evening and I've got my dunce cap on. Once I added '8082'
to allowed ports
But since I brought Coral Web Builder up does anyone know anything more about
that product? It seemed like the biggest benefit they tried to sell themselves
on was that you paid for the server once and then you could deploy it on as
many machines as possible (the idea being to run CF apps
In the free version of BD, there are no BD-specific DSN settings, since the
DSN's need to be set at the OS level.
I realized, however, that I was using cfqueryparam in that query; I always
use cfqueryparam for a number of very valid reasons. When I changed that
cfqueryparam cfsqltype value from
Pete Ruckelshaus wrote:
With a smaller chunk of text, both insert and update queries work just fine.
does BD have an enable CLOB option and/or Long Text Buffer (chr) size in
it's dsn admin bits? if so turn those on and/or increase the size.
also wondering about the ODBC driver you're using,
Sounds like a permission error for the directory that holds the pages.
On 5/14/07, Qasim Rasheed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
I am hoping that someone on this list might be able to help me with the
installation issues. I downloaded the Server JX from New Atlanta website
and
Andrew,
Thanks for the response. How do I set up permission for the directory for
the built in web server?
Qasim
On 5/13/07, Andrew Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a permission error for the directory that holds the pages.
On 5/14/07, Qasim Rasheed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The same way you do for Apache and IIS.
If the service for Bluedragon has no rights for the drectory then you will
run into these sort of problems.
On 5/14/07, Qasim Rasheed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
Thanks for the response. How do I set up permission for the directory for
the built
Jason T. Slack wrote:
I tried the BlueDragon 7 beta and I cannot get it to install properly.
It only installs the uninstall application, nothing else.
the version 6.x installer works perfectly.
Application.cfc is a BD7 feature. You need BD7 to use it.
Jochem
Hi,
Btw~ Coldfusion runs pretty damn good on intel macs, you just gotta
spend an additional 20 seconds on the install.
I tried installing CF 7.02 and the install went well but I cannot
start the server.
How did you get it to install and start the server?
-jason
: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Hi Josh,
I tried the BlueDragon 7 beta and I cannot get it to install properly.
It only installs the uninstall application, nothing else.
the version 6.x installer works perfectly.
So what do I do to fix my issue? I
/products/bluedragon/self_help/
archive_search/index
..cfm
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jason T. Slack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Hi Josh,
I tried the BlueDragon 7 beta and I cannot get
://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/
archive_search/index
..cfm
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jason T. Slack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Hi Josh,
I tried the BlueDragon 7 beta
Oops, I meant Jason...
If you have BD 6.2 up and running on OS X all you have to do is
convert your Application.cfc file to Application.cfm. As was already
mentioned, BD 6.2 does not support Application.cfc, but BD 7 which
will be release in January(?) will.
, November 16, 2006 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Hi Josh,
Any chance of getting this beta early?
-Jason
On Nov 16, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Josh Adams wrote:
It's possible that you're not doing anything wrong in regards to BD 7
beta--the installer may not have been tested
: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Oops, I meant Jason...
If you have BD 6.2 up and running on OS X all you have to do is convert your
Application.cfc file to Application.cfm. As was already mentioned, BD 6.2
does not support Application.cfc, but BD 7
Check the case of the FILENAME for Application.cfm - make sure it has a
capital A - it apparently makes a difference on unix type machines.
Rick
Jason T. Slack wrote:
I am evaluating Blue Dragon for OS X since I am invested in CF (new
to it, but making the investment) and CF 7 does not run
Hi Rick,
Yeah that put me further along in the process.
Now I get:
The tag CFQUERY had no corresponding ending tag
Source
20: cfelse
21:!--- login failed ---
22:cflocation url=index.cfm /
23: /cfif
^ Snippet from underlying CFML source
Here is the full code:
!--- Check
CF tags are not case sensitive and common practice is to have them all lower
case.
1)
cfset SESSION.LocationName = #ckCreds.LocationName#
For purposes of style and assumed functionality:
cfset SESSION.LocationName = ckCreds.LocationName
2)
You are missing a # symbol by the word application:
Jason T. Slack wrote:
Yeah that put me further along in the process.
cfquery name=ckCreds datasource=Application.dsn#
You're missing an opening # sign on the datasource attribute
Should be
cfquery name=ckCreds datasource=#Application.dsn#
whenever you get a missing end tag and you're
Hi Teddy,
2)
You are missing a # symbol by the word application:
cfquery name=ckCreds datasource=Application.dsn#
should be
cfquery name=ckCreds datasource=#application.dsn#
Makes no difference, I still get an application.dsn doesn't exist
message
3)
For:
WHERE LocationID =
Hi Rick,
I noticed that. Here is what I have:
1:
2: !--- Check Locations table first to see if the location id and
password is right---
3: cfquery name=ckCreds datasource=#Application.dsn#
4: SELECT LocationID, LocationName FROM Locations
5: WHERE LocationID = Cfqueryparam
What error are you getting now?
Rick
Jason T. Slack wrote:
Hi Rick,
I noticed that. Here is what I have:
1:
2: !--- Check Locations table first to see if the location id and
password is right---
3: cfquery name=ckCreds datasource=#Application.dsn#
4: SELECT LocationID, LocationName
Do you see your dsn if you cfdump var=#application# ?
-Original Message-
From: Jason T. Slack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Hi Rick,
I noticed that. Here is what I have:
1:
2: !--- Check
I am still getting Application.dsn not found.
-Jason
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Rick Root wrote:
What error are you getting now?
Rick
Jason T. Slack wrote:
Hi Rick,
I noticed that. Here is what I have:
1:
2: !--- Check Locations table first to see if the location id and
password
Is the file in the same directory as the application.cfc? If not, is there
another application.cfc or .cfm in the sub folder?
Teddy
On 11/15/06, Jason T. Slack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still getting Application.dsn not found.
-Jason
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Rick Root wrote:
Jason,
Did you get this resolved? If not, please post your current code and
error messages.
-Aaron
On 11/15/06, Teddy Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the file in the same directory as the application.cfc? If not, is there
another application.cfc or .cfm in the sub folder?
Teddy
On
: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Is the file in the same directory as the application.cfc? If not, is there
another application.cfc or .cfm in the sub folder?
Teddy
On 11/15/06, Jason T. Slack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still getting Application.dsn
There is an interesting issue with BD that I discovered when
I was trying it
out.
I found that on Linux with Apache, when using user
directories with Apache,
BD it does not go up through the directory structure to find the
Application.cfm or Application.cfc file, as it should. If
Jason
can you run the following?:
cfquery name=ckCreds datasource=webPOS
SELECT LocationID, LocationName FROM Locations
WHERE LocationID = Cfqueryparam cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
/cfquery
Regards
Mark Drew
On 15 Nov 2006, at 13:59, Jason T. Slack wrote:
I am evaluating Blue Dragon for OS X
Did you report this to New Atlanta?
Yes, and supposedly it was resolved...I stopped using the account though, so
I hadn't applied the hotfix that was supposed to have resolved the issue. I
do recall someone on the NA mail list still having the same problem even
after the hotfix though.
Hi Jason,
I believe you misunderstood Rick Roots original Post. From what I've
read of this thread, it looks to me like you capitalized the A in your
CFML code, turning application.dsn into Application.dsn.
Rick was actually talking about your Application.cfc file itself - not
anything in your
Jason T. Slack wrote:
I am still getting Application.dsn not found.
It's important to note that the onApplicationStart function ONLY runs
when an application is initialized, which is generally a pretty rare
occurrence for a web site that gets accessed a lot.
One way to force the application
, November 15, 2006 12:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
Did you report this to New Atlanta?
Yes, and supposedly it was resolved...I stopped using the account though, so
I hadn't applied the hotfix that was supposed to have resolved the issue. I
do recall someone on the NA
of that file.
Let us know where things stand!
Thanks,
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jason T. Slack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 10:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
I am still getting Application.dsn not found.
-Jason
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:17
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 10:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BlueDragon Question
I am still getting Application.dsn not found.
-Jason
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Rick Root wrote:
What error are you getting now?
Rick
Jason T. Slack wrote:
Hi Rick,
I
Btw~ Coldfusion runs pretty damn good on intel macs, you just gotta spend an
additional 20 seconds on the install.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information
One is FREE, one is J2EE, one is .NET
-Original Message-
From: Dan Plesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 November 2006 04:27
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: BLUEDRAGON
What is the difference between the JX version and normal server version
Dan,
The normal version is free for non-commercial use basically. You
should check the license on it though, there were some changes with it
when 6.2 was released.
The JX version is what you would want if you are going to run BD on a
commercial set up, but don't need to leverage a full J2EE
New Atlanta provides a feature comparison matrix on their site. At
least for BD 6.1, not sure if they've got one for BD 7 yet.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: BLUEDRAGON (Was... Help using
What is the difference between the JX version and normal server version?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door
On 8/16/06, Eric Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
installing BlueDragon 6.21/302 on W2K3 and for some reason it isn't seeing
IIS to install the adapter. Oddly enough this is a reinstall, where it
recognized IIS originally. Thoughts?
There was an issue previously where you needed to create a
the connection wasn't working.
my bad. It really was working.
I think some of the New Atlanta techs are here also, but I could be wrong.
thanks for the advice.
Take Care,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 16, 2006 9:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re
? I don't know that I have anything for you but I'm also not sure I
completely follow what you need it to do.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: BlueDragon no seeing IIS on W2K3
Yeah I
jay beal wrote:
In th free server edition of BlueDragon 6.2.1 I am getting the error No
such function exists - functionname. This error thrown from a CFC page and
only comes up once ever few days. To fix it I must clear the files in cache
from the BlueDragon administrator, or touch the CFC
1 - 100 of 483 matches
Mail list logo
