RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]

2003-02-26 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh
As Skarphedinsson told me before about the G.SHDSL 828, he was completely right. Cisco 828 and SOHO 78 G.SHDSL routers offer an affordable broadband WAN access solution that can be carried over existing copper telephone lines (Dry one). The routers provide a symmetrical WAN connection at speeds

RE: Sniffer Software [7:63796]

2003-02-26 Thread Troy Leliard
Why not try ethereal .. its free!! PacketEXPERTS wrote: Have anyone gotten NetXray 3.0 or Sniffer Pro 4.5 to work with XP. Thanks ___ Sent by ePrompter, the premier email notification software. Free download at

RE: Bridging over point to point [7:63790]

2003-02-26 Thread Troy Leliard
Is your video delivery method unicast or multicast. If it is multicast you may need to enable m/cast routing. Terry Martin wrote: I have set up in my lab, bridging over a point to point T1. I am now trying to pass video traffic over this link, and it is not working. I can ping from a pc

RE: REdistrubution - Two way [7:63827]

2003-02-26 Thread Troy Leliard
Redistributing IGP's into EGP's, while possible is not always the best solution. If you IGP (in this case RIP), is not stable it can cause route flapping in BGP (which has greater consequences than for IGP's. in that upstream BGP peers would route dampen your flapping routes.) You would also

Conent Switching on LD416's [7:63846]

2003-02-26 Thread Troy Leliard
Hi there all, I've got a couple of Local Director's, and am trying to find a way of doing intelligent layer7) health checks of real servers. eg for ftp, the LD will probe port 21 on eht real server...if this port is not in a listening stated the LD will remove the real server from the binding

BGP notification message [7:63847]

2003-02-26 Thread KW S
This is the extract from a show log Feb 26 03:37:28: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 203.162.129.39 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes Feb 26 03:37:28: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 203.162.129.39 Down BGP Notification received Feb 26 03:46:44: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 203.162.129.39

New CCDP [7:63848]

2003-02-26 Thread Skarphedinsson Arni V.
Please note that under the new structure, Remote Access exam (640-605) will no longer be a required exam for CCDP. Registration for the current 640-025 exam will end on May 27, 2003, and the existing Cisco Internetwork Design (CID) course will end-of-life on April 28, 2003. For those candidates

RE: BGP notification message [7:63847]

2003-02-26 Thread fred barreras
Notification is one of the 4 message types used by BGP. The other three are keepalives, open and updates. Notifications are used to inform the receiving router of errors. Looks like neighbor did not respond before hold down time expired and therefore adjacency was lost and then recovered 9 min

RE: BGP notification message [7:63847]

2003-02-26 Thread KW S
Hi Fred Thanks for your reply. I am trying to find out what causes the peer to lose connection. By looking at the log,I only know that it was down for 9 mins. No other information is given in the log. I know that the notifications message itself has some kind of error code and sub code that

RE: BGP notification message [7:63847]

2003-02-26 Thread Troy Leliard
From the cisco website Error Message %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor [chars][chars][chars][chars] [chars] Explanation A BGP neighbor has either come up or gone down. This message describes the change for the BGP neighbor and appears only if the log-neighbor-changes command is configured

RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]

2003-02-26 Thread Albert Lu
Hi, Is this correct? Has anyone tried this before? If it's true, then it will really be great!! Imagine being able to replace frame relay, vpn for a office thats nearby and not have to pay a service provider on a regular basis for port/pvc/cir charges. Albert -Original Message- From:

FW: FW: Ethernet Slot Time and Delay [7:63659]

2003-02-26 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
Ms. Oppenheimer A Collegue of my pointed out to me that my wording my have seemed harsh. And that is why you slammed me for it. I did'nt think of it as a slamming just an expercience tech answering the newbie's questions. But if I offended you in any way, I apologize. I will also try and watch

RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]

2003-02-26 Thread Albert Lu
Found it on cisco.com http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/800/prodlit/apcnf_an.htm Sounds great!! If only it could do multipoint rather than only point-to-point, I guess you can't expect too much from a copper pair. Maybe cisco can come out with router with multiple g.shdsl interface.

RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]

2003-02-26 Thread Troy Leliard
NON Cisco, but hey .. tutsytems have a MTU pop (Multi Tenant User), basically its not multipoint but a chasis that can terminate numberous SDSL connections over existing copper pair. The use an eample of puytting one of these in the basement of a tenant appartment, then using the existing copper

7204 and 7206 Router Expansion [7:63856]

2003-02-26 Thread R.S.Sundar
Hello All, I would like to know the possibility of expanding the Cisco 7204 VXR (NPE-225) - 6 Slot and cisco 7206 VXR Routers with NPE-400 (6 Slots). Base configuration: 1. Cisco 7204 VXR Router with NPE-225 I/O slot with 1 Ethernet Interface with 6 Slots-IOS

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the difference between conventional layer 3 routing and layer 3 switching. A little background. I am currently working towards my CCNA (have been for about 3 years). At any rate, everything I read and look at says that switching/bridging is

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-02-26 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
You will need routing between the VLANs. If this is done via the uplink you will also need to do some trunking. Hope this helps. -Original Message- From: J. Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2950 telnet access is

RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]

2003-02-26 Thread Albert Lu
Sounds interesting. I'm looking at the IntelliPop 5000. It looks like it's doing VDSL, and limited to 4000ft. This is probably only suitable for utilising copper pairs within a building. But it pipes data at up to 26Mbps. Cisco's G.SHDSL goes alot further but with lesser bandwidth. Does anyone

Cisco VPN [7:63860]

2003-02-26 Thread Maximus
I don't believe I'm meant to be able to accept incoming VPN requests and connect to my employer's VPN. Specifically the problem is VPN requests are serviced on the way in and at the same time I can successfully connect to my employer's VPN but I can't decrypt the packets coming back from my

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread alaerte Vidali
If you are using MSFC2/PFC2, the PFC2 (does layer 3 wirespeed 'forwarding' between Vlan) will have a FIB (forwarding information base), which is a copy of the RIB (routing information base). The RIB is built on the MSFC2 (router functions). Even the first packet between Vlan 1 and 2 will be wire

RE: Voice degradation problem in Cisco VoIP networ [7:63823]

2003-02-26 Thread alaerte Vidali
If you want, send us the configuration (with fantasy addresses) and the result of show interface and show interface stats. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63862t=63823 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: 7204 and 7206 Router Expansion [7:63856]

2003-02-26 Thread The Long and Winding Road
the problem with the 72xx series is the limited backplane. Cisco uses a bandwidth points method for determining numbers and kinds of cards. There is a left half and a right half and it is strongly recommended that you do not exceed the bandwidth points for each side. you may want to try out the

Cannot ping ospf routes from a rip router? [7:63864]

2003-02-26 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, I have 3 routers setup, running ospf and rip ver 1 with 2 way redistribution on the middle router.The ospf routers have loopbacks as 10.8.8.8/24 and 10.9.9.9/24The rip router has a loopback of 10.2.2.2/24.The middle router running rip has networks 10 and netw 120 defined.I cannot ping

catOS system prompt [7:63865]

2003-02-26 Thread Eagles Fan
in the process of resolving attribute errors in the ciscoworks rme database, I realized that when the system prompt is manually set, it causes a conflict with tacacs user and enable passwords. it appears to be a bug with the latest version of RME. is it possible to clear the system prompt,

Backup Site - 152Mbps [7:63866]

2003-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To build a backup server farm site (22 servers), with maximum requirement of 152Mbps (peak): Economic approach: 3640 with ATM module 3550-48-SMI 3 ATM PVCs, to the major points of the backbone (LS1010 switches and 6509-FlexWan ATM card); each PVC 5 Mbps SCR. Robust and Scalable approach: 6006

RE: Cannot ping ospf routes from a rip router? [7:63864]

2003-02-26 Thread Andrew Larkins
please send the rest of the config so we can have a look. -Original Message- From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 February 2003 16:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cannot ping ospf routes from a rip router? [7:63864] Hello, I have 3 routers setup, running ospf and rip

Re: 7204 and 7206 Router Expansion [7:63856]

2003-02-26 Thread MADMAN
R.S.Sundar wrote: Hello All, I would like to know the possibility of expanding the Cisco 7204 VXR (NPE-225) - 6 Slot The 7204 has 4 slots and a VXR with a NPE225 does not fully utilize the VXR backplane capabilities, you need at least a NPE300 and cisco 7206 VXR Routers with NPE-400

RE: Sniffer Software [7:63796]

2003-02-26 Thread Arnold, Jamie
Or NGSSniff..also free and works without a driver. -Original Message- From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Sniffer Software [7:63796] Why not try ethereal .. its free!! PacketEXPERTS wrote: Have

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread Evans, TJ (BearingPoint)
That all looks pretty good ... On the MSFC/RSM - do a show interface: (edited for length) Vlan8 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Cat6k RP Virtual Ethernet, address is 00d0.d335.6614 Vlan9 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Cat6k RP Virtual

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread Steve Wilson
Charles, The 6509 switch needs some configuration in the background to create a virtual router. This virtual router has virtual interfaces that would mimic the default gateways IP addresses of the physical 2500 router and therefore pass traffic between the virtual interfaces. The two subnets that

RE: 7206 adding VIP cards [7:63673]

2003-02-26 Thread Arnold, Jamie
One of the Pas did in fact work. The tech I had install them saw the console message that said shutting down all interfaces, but it was on the new card! This was a 100Mb card. The 8 port 10Mb card is the one that gives a console message saying that it needs a HW revision to work in the 7206

??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread Steven Aiello
Hello All, I'm wondering was IS-IS is. No pun intended. I'm assuming it's a routing protocol? I've gone through Cisco, CCNA acad. and have my CCNA and I've even started going over Semester 5 for the CCNP, but IS-IS is no where to be found... Is this a new protocol? Or does someone know

Re: Backup Site - 152Mbps [7:63866]

2003-02-26 Thread The Long and Winding Road
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To build a backup server farm site (22 servers), with maximum requirement of 152Mbps (peak): Economic approach: 3640 with ATM module 3550-48-SMI 3 ATM PVCs, to the major points of the backbone (LS1010 switches and 6509-FlexWan ATM card); each PVC 5

Re: ??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread The Long and Winding Road
yes it is a routing protocol. it has been around a while. as good a place as any to start is Radia Perlman's Interconnections book. Cisco's web site has some resources: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt2/1cdisis.htm Doyle's book is OK. Steven

Re: Cannot ping ospf routes from a rip router? [7:63864]

2003-02-26 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Cisco Nuts wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have 3 routers setup, running ospf and rip ver 1 with 2 way redistribution on the middle router.The ospf routers have loopbacks as 10.8.8.8/24 and 10.9.9.9/24The rip router has a loopback of 10.2.2.2/24.The middle router running rip

RE: The CCNP BSIN ( I Think Exam ) [7:63749]

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel Cotts
There are two Cisco Press books that cover Semester Five. CCNP Cisco Networking Academy Program: Semester Five Lab Companion ISBN 1578702348 Semester Five Companion Guide Advanced Routing ISBN 1587130114 -Original Message- From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: Backup Site - 152Mbps [7:63866]

2003-02-26 Thread Troy Leliard
I'm never a big fan of having backup sites that lie active | standby! You may want to look at getting a CSS and doing GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing!) Anyway, back to your question ...How much of the traffic is local ? You say that you have a peak of 152MB's, but you will only have 3 x 5MB

Re: REdistrubution - Two way [7:63827]

2003-02-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 5:14 AM + 2/26/03, Metla Venu Gopal wrote: Its on a real life scenario implementing MPLS Dont you thins there will be any kinda of problems when you redistrubute RIP V2 stuff in BGP and again redistribute the same into RIP. Doesnt that cause any problem taking into consideration the

Re: Sniffer Software [7:63796]

2003-02-26 Thread PacketEXPERTS
Thank for getting back to me, okay this is what I am seeing: NetXray and Sniffer Pro work fine in 98, but when I try to load them onto a coupter running XP, it stops the install dead in its tracks and tell me to get an XP verision of the software. = = = Original message = = = Works fine for me.

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 12:45 PM + 2/26/03, DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the difference between conventional layer 3 routing and layer 3 switching. A little background. I am currently working towards my CCNA (have been for about 3 years). At any rate,

DOES MED TRAVEL IN I-BGP?? [7:63884]

2003-02-26 Thread ciscoGo2002
Hello folks, I have a question for you about MED. Suppose the following lab: ROUTER A ROUTER B ROUTER C ___ Yahoo! Msviles Personaliza tu msvil con tu logo y melodma favorito en http://moviles.yahoo.es

RE: 7206 adding VIP cards [7:63673]

2003-02-26 Thread tu do
Jamie wrote: The 8 port 10Mb card is the one that gives a console message saying that it needs a HW revision to work in the 7206 VXR. The PAs have compatible issues with 7200VXR. Only the PAs those said VXR compatible work on 7200VXR. The older's work on 7K, 75xx, or c5rsm only. There are good

PIX [7:63885]

2003-02-26 Thread Manny
Hello group, This is what I have in my PIX log. The 64.74.xx.xx is a VPN gateway that has an interface on the outside and an interface on the inside. The outside IP is the 64.74.xx.xx and the inside has a 172.xx.xx.xx address. The 24.46.xx.xx is a user trying to connect to the gateway. The

Scheduling Timed FTP [7:63886]

2003-02-26 Thread Peter P
We wish to occasionally have a router perform a large FTP download. The router needs to have a low priority applied to this transfer in order to not cause outage to other time sensitive applications that are running concurrently. Obviously we can configure priority queuing or some such similar

Re: 7204 and 7206 Router Expansion [7:63856]

2003-02-26 Thread MADMAN
so far as I know, the router remains operational if you exceed bandwidth points. However, if you have performance problems, Cisco will not support you. You are correct as I have run a 7206 beyond the recommended points, you just have to ignore the error messages and not cry to Cisco if

Wildcard Masking on the BSIN Exam [7:63887]

2003-02-26 Thread Steven Aiello
Any one know if they cover wild card masking in depth on the BSIN Exam? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63887t=63887 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: 7204 and 7206 Router Expansion [7:63856]

2003-02-26 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
MADMAN wrote: You are correct as I have run a 7206 beyond the recommended points, you just have to ignore the error messages and not cry to Cisco if you have issues!! Same here. Those 'points' are just guidelines; all that happens if you go over them, is that you run the risk of

RE: ??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread Mike Bernico
Check Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP vol I. It has some good information on IS-IS. IS-IS is a link state routing protocol that is very popular with large ISPs. I'm actually a big fan. OSPF is great too though, don't get me wrong. You can also learn more about how ISPs use it at www.nanog.org.

PIX question [7:63892]

2003-02-26 Thread Edward Sohn
does someone know what the equivalent of clear counters is on the PIX? i don't know why, but i can't find a thing... thanks, ed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63892t=63892 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: ??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 3:38 PM + 2/26/03, Steven Aiello wrote: Hello All, I'm wondering was IS-IS is. No pun intended. Don't be scared of punning in this context. A T-shirt frequently seen at IETF (home of OSPF) meetings read: IS - IS = 0 Both ISIS and OSPF are link state routing

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 3:18 PM + 2/26/03, Steve Wilson wrote: Charles, The 6509 switch needs some configuration in the background to create a virtual router. A bit of a heads-up on this term. It's conceptually useful, but be aware that virtual router was considered to be an alternate VPN model to RFC 2547,

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-02-26 Thread J. Johnson
Ugh. I was hoping there would be something obvious. I already have what you suggest - a router on a stick configuration with the vlans combined in an 802.1Q trunk to the router. Here's a picture: |--| |--| | oreilly.net |--|vlan5 | |--|

Re: 7206 adding VIP cards [7:63673]

2003-02-26 Thread MADMAN
Can you plug the PA back into the VIP card and do a sh diag? I have a PA-8T, (this is what I'm assuming you have), in a 7206VXR that works. It is HW version 1.14 and the router is running 12.2.4T: Slot 5: Ethernet Port adapter, 8 ports Port adapter is analyzed

Re: 7206 adding VIP cards [7:63673]

2003-02-26 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
MADMAN wrote: Can you plug the PA back into the VIP card and do a sh diag? I have a PA-8T, (this is what I'm assuming you have), in a 7206VXR that works. It is HW version 1.14 and the router is running 12.2.4T: 1.14 is the minimum PA-8E HW revision supported in the VXR, according to

RE: Sniffer Software [7:63796]

2003-02-26 Thread Packet
Thanks for the heads-up, it took me like an hour to find the software, like no one had it, finally I found it at: http://omis3.omis.niu.edu/download/SECURITY/ then look for NGSSniff.exe I did not really get the fix that I was looking for, but I guess that this work around should work. Thank =

Re: ??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread Tom Lisa
Steve, Yes, it is a routing protocol and has just recently been added to the new BSCI (was BSCN) exam. Unfortunately, the folks that make the decisions about what's added to the certification exams didn't give the Academy folks any lead time to change our Advanced Routing curriculum. We should

Cannot see Rip routes with route-tagging - Why? [7:63900]

2003-02-26 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello,I have R6, R5 and R4 running rip ver 2, network 178.1.10.0 subnetsR5, R4 and R2 running eigrp 2 network 181.16.2.0 subnets.R5 and R4 had mutual redistribution setup using route tagging.R6 correctly sees the eigrp redistributed routes but R2 is NOT seeing any rip redistributed routes. Any

Cannot see Rip routes with route-tagging - Config on R6 [7:63901]

2003-02-26 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello,Here is the config on R6 the Rip router receiving the redistributed Eigrp routes: R6#r 178.1.0.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets C 178.1.10.0 is directly connected, TokenRing0 C 178.1.10.4 is directly connected, Ethernet0 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1

Practice Labs [7:63902]

2003-02-26 Thread Sam
Hey there. I have access to a 65xx,55xx and another layer2. I wish to try my hands on sample labs and practice some stuff. I have already done things like end-to-end vlans. What else can I try. Thanks Sam Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63902t=63902

TCP window size - Additive Increase - Slow Start [7:63904]

2003-02-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking at TCP4s Flow Control mechanism. I have found Additive Increase/multiplicative decrease and slow start explanation. What I am looking for is how TCP/IP on our servers behavior when congestion occurs related with the window size. Any Thoughts? Message Posted at:

RE: DOES MED TRAVEL IN I-BGP?? [7:63884]

2003-02-26 Thread cebuano
BEST way is to test it out and check the BGPP table. Please note you have several options when dealing with MED attribute. Check the command reference for the 12.2 to see the features. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ciscoGo2002 Sent:

Found Chuck Semeria's IP addressing Paper [7:63906]

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel Cotts
For a number of years there was a paper on IP addressing by Chuck Semeria on the 3Com web site. It is no longer there. Just found it on the NANOG site. 63 page pdf. www.nanog.org/isp.html Scroll down to CIDR. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63906t=63906

Re: Sniffer Software [7:63796]

2003-02-26 Thread rick
Ethereal works fine under XP. Rick On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, PacketEXPERTS wrote: Thank for getting back to me, okay this is what I am seeing: NetXray and Sniffer Pro work fine in 98, but when I try to load them onto a coupter running XP, it stops the install dead in its tracks and tell me to

Re: Practice Labs [7:63902]

2003-02-26 Thread Brad Ellis
Check out www.fatkid.com They have FREE practice labs you can try on your home lab. thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (RS / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccbootcamp.com (cisco training) Sam wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey there. I have access to a 65xx,55xx and

Port level / VLAN level bandwidth limit [7:63910]

2003-02-26 Thread Raga
Does anybody got an idea to control bandwidth on Port level / on VLAN basis on Cat 2912 / Cat 2924 switches running 12.0 IOS. I would like to limit the bandwidth to each PCs in varying limits (Say 128K, 256K, 512K etc). Controlling on the basis of IP address will not solve my problem. If there is

IPSEC question [7:63903]

2003-02-26 Thread Bruno Fernandes
Hi, Just to confirm, does the PIX support TED ? Regards, BF Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63903t=63903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

Re: Practice Labs [7:63902]

2003-02-26 Thread Larry Letterman
mac address security vlan trunking aux vlans private vlans vacls telnet security bpdu guard root guard port fast Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: Sam To: Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: Practice Labs [7:63902] Hey there.

RE: 2950 telnet access is lost after vlans [7:63789]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
J. Johnson wrote: Ugh. I was hoping there would be something obvious. I already have what you suggest - a router on a stick configuration with the vlans combined in an 802.1Q trunk to the router. Here's a picture: The picture got a bit munged. I think I understand it, though. The

Re: ??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread
It is a routing protocol similar to OSPF in some ways. Check out links for IS-IS at www.ccie4u.com/study_guide.htm Thanks, Ian On 26 Feb 2003 at 15:38, Steven Aiello wrote: Hello All, I'm wondering was IS-IS is. No pun intended. I'm assuming it's a routing protocol? I've gone

Re: ??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread John Neiberger
Hello All, I'm wondering was IS-IS is. No pun intended. I'm assuming it's a routing protocol? I've gone through Cisco, CCNA acad. and have my CCNA and I've even started going over Semester 5 for the CCNP, but IS-IS is no where to be found... Is this a new protocol? Or does someone know

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
DeVoe, Charles (PKI) wrote: OK, let me try this again. I am trying to figure out the difference between conventional layer 3 routing and layer 3 switching. A little background. I am currently working towards my CCNA (have been for about 3 years). At any rate, everything I read and

RPC Endpoint Mapper [7:63916]

2003-02-26 Thread COULOMBE, TROY
Anyone know of a good resource on RPC endpoint mapper? I trying to find where in the packet the server tells the client which [new] port to come back on. Using a sniffer, but I cant seem to nail down where in the payload the future port is passed to the client. a google search of rpc endpoint

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Evans, TJ (BearingPoint) wrote: That all looks pretty good ... On the MSFC/RSM - do a show interface: (edited for length) Vlan8 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Cat6k RP Virtual Ethernet, address is 00d0.d335.6614 Vlan9 is up, line protocol is up

RE: RPC Endpoint Mapper [7:63916]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
In the olden days, in a Unix world, RPC required PortMappter. Maybe you could look that up? Not sure if there's a space, i.e. Port Mapper. I don't think there is. It's a separate protocol for assigning port numbers. You should see evidence of it on your Sniffer if it still exists. What operating

VPN Client-RAS-VPN-PIX Route Mapping? [7:63919]

2003-02-26 Thread Tim Weil
This is a classic VPN Gateway behind the PIX question... Can NAT/PAT/Static Routes be used on a Trusted PIX Port to provide Web Access to RAS/VPN Client to VPN3000 Gateway to PIX Trusted Port The VPN Gateway is positioned on a subnet behind the PIX. URL references are appreciated.

eBGP Multi-Hop [7:63920]

2003-02-26 Thread Jim Devane
I am not sure how to overcome a potential problem. I have a BGP feed from an upstream provider that is a multi-hop. I am concerned that if that neighboring router goes down I will still be sending traffic out to him. The Interface will not go down since the circuit does not term on the BGP router

RE: New CCDP [7:63848]

2003-02-26 Thread Prather Aaron
From what I can tell, that is correct. Im about to take the CID myself, and it seems that if you complete it before its retired, you are CCDP for 3 more years. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63922t=63848 -- FAQ,

CID, No X.25/Microsoft/Appletalk/IPX? [7:63921]

2003-02-26 Thread Prather Aaron
I was reviewing the exam outline on cisco's site for the CID exam and noticed that it did not say anything about X.25, IPX, Appletalk, or Microsoft Networking. Have they removed this from the exam? I got my CCDP 3 years ago and now want to recert (I recerted my CCNP already so all I have left is

PIX without public address translation [7:63908]

2003-02-26 Thread Azhar Teza
I have a two interface PIX in a lab. I am trying to simulate this for a customer. Th PIX will be used between two Private networks in the same campus for some political reason. On a PIX outside Interface the network is 172.16.10.0/24, and inside network is on 192.168.10.0/24. Outside interface is

Mutual Redistribution - OSPF routes in Eigrp [7:63923]

2003-02-26 Thread McHugh Randy
Is there a defualt orginate command that I need to use to do mutual redistrubtion? I want to redistribute OSPF into EIGRP and EIGRP into OSPF . r1(config-router)#redistribute eigrp 1 metric 20 sub r1(config-router)#redistribute eigrp 1 metric 20 subnets ? metric Metric for redistributed

RE: Frame-Relay issue [7:63446]

2003-02-26 Thread Deepak N
Hi Monu I tried the configuration given by you. But i didnt find any problem in bringing up the interface when i cut and paste the configuration. Here is the config when i cut n paste the config from a text file yourname(config)#interface Serial1/1 yourname(config-if)#shut

Re: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot exchange VLAN info even [7:63926]

2003-02-26 Thread suaveguru
not sure , you mean the code version do play a part? So if it does play a part what code version should I run ? regards, suaveguru --- Larry Letterman wrote: what version of 1900 code are they running.? Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message -

Eigrp neighbor loss [7:63925]

2003-02-26 Thread McManus, Robert BGI SDC
I was hoping someone could help out with a problem I am seeing. I just enabled logging of eigrp neighbor changes for the first time and noticed that there are constant neighbor changes going on over our WAN/LAN. First guess was the hello timers but since it is on the LAN this is not the issue.

RE: TCP window size - Additive Increase - Slow Start [7:63904]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking at TCP4s Flow Control mechanism. I have found Additive Increase/multiplicative decrease and slow start explanation. What I am looking for is how TCP/IP on our servers behavior when congestion occurs related with the window size. Any Thoughts? I

RE: L3 Switching Huh???? [7:63728]

2003-02-26 Thread Peter van Oene
A And that's exactly what would happen if you did the inter-VLAN routing on a router too, using subinterfaces for each VLAN/ IP subnet. :-) And, if it were a high-end router, it could do this at wire speed and would have a RIB and FIB, just like someone else described for the 6500. The 7500

RE: Different usename n pwd for PAP and CHAP [7:63442]

2003-02-26 Thread Deepak N
HI Troy My question is, suppose as you said, usera and userb have established a connection using chap and Pap, now is it possible to give one set of username for chap and another set for pap? The config looks like this ppp authentication chap pap ppp chap hostname ppp chap password

RE: RPC Endpoint Mapper [7:63916]

2003-02-26 Thread COULOMBE, TROY
Priscilla, thanks for the quick reply :) yes, so far all 3 sniffers havent revealed much [ethereal, sniffer, my fav: etherpeek-nx] all show the decodes for RPC, but this is a Win2k box talking MS-RPC [port 135, initially] somehow, someway an upper port is getting assigned [4541 for example]

Re: ??? IS-IS ??? [7:63875]

2003-02-26 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 10:25 PM + 2/26/03, John Neiberger wrote: Hello All, I'm wondering was IS-IS is. No pun intended. I'm assuming it's a routing protocol? I've gone through Cisco, CCNA acad. and have my CCNA and I've even started going over Semester 5 for the CCNP, but IS-IS is no where to be

CCNP Recertification Exam [7:63932]

2003-02-26 Thread Masaru Umetsu
I have to take a exam of CCNP Recertification in this year. If you know the book to study for CCNP Recertification, please give me an advice. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63932t=63932 -- FAQ, list archives, and

RE: RPC Endpoint Mapper [7:63916]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sorry I don't have a URL that explains how Windows RPC on a server hands out a port number for the client to use. Anyone else? However, I will help you reverse engineer it! ;-) Are you guessing that the port number is in that same packet that has the IP address in ASCII. That would be my guess,

Ping-ICMP question [7:63934]

2003-02-26 Thread sisco
Is ping/icmp protocol needs to be prioritized on Lan environment just to have a good latency ping result? is it ping a good basis for measuring your network if it is congested? Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63934t=63934

RE: 7206 adding VIP cards [7:63673]

2003-02-26 Thread Arnold, Jamie
Tac told us that these were compatible... Imagination is more important than knowledge Albert Einstein -Original Message- From: tu do [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 7206 adding VIP cards [7:63673] Jamie

Re: OSPF and MTU, spawned from the OSPF vs. EIGRP thread [7:63936]

2003-02-26 Thread The Long and Winding Road
Reviving an oldie but a goodie, based on some work I was doing today. I wanted to check something that required 3 routers, and all I had were 2 routers and the 3550 switch. well, that's ok. L3 and all. BTW, have we decided which is better - an L3 switch or a router? Hint - the L3 switch is FAR

Re: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot exchange VLAN info even [7:63937]

2003-02-26 Thread Larry Letterman
to get all the bells and whistles you need to run Enterprise version of 1900 operating cose. Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: suaveguru To: Larry Letterman ; Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:39 PM Subject: Re: two 1900 catalyst switches

??? IS-IS ??? [7:63938]

2003-02-26 Thread Michael Cinquanti
Peter van Oene has authored a two-part Study Guide that's been quite well received at CertificationZone. Hello All, I'm wondering was IS-IS is. No pun intended. I'm assuming it's a routing protocol? I've gone through Cisco, CCNA acad. and have my CCNA and I've even started going

Re: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot exchange VLAN info even [7:63939]

2003-02-26 Thread suaveguru
ok I will try that out --- Larry Letterman wrote: to get all the bells and whistles you need to run Enterprise version of 1900 operating cose. Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems - Original Message - From: suaveguru To: Larry Letterman ; Sent: Wednesday,

CiscoSecure Question [7:63941]

2003-02-26 Thread Mossburg, Geoff (MAN-Corporate)
All, Does anyone out there have experience with CiscoSecure? I could really use the help! I have over 50 routers that I'm setting up to access through TACACS, and I've been told that I have to make entries in CiscoSecure for every interface on every router to make sure that each router is

RE: RPC Endpoint Mapper [7:63916]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
COULOMBE, TROY wrote: Priscilla, thanks for the quick reply :) yes, so far all 3 sniffers havent revealed much [ethereal, sniffer, my fav: etherpeek-nx] all show the decodes for RPC, but this is a Win2k box talking MS-RPC [port 135, initially] somehow, someway an upper port is

RE: CiscoSecure Question [7:63941]

2003-02-26 Thread Jim Brown
You can hardcode the source address of TACACS requests on the routers. This keeps you from needing to define every interface in the TACACS server. The command is ip tacacs source-interface. You can also define network devices in CiscoSecure with wildcards. You could have one entry that maps all

RE: Ping-ICMP question [7:63934]

2003-02-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
sisco wrote: gurus, :) Is ping/icmp protocol needs to be prioritized on Lan environment just to have a good latency ping result? is it ping a good basis for measuring your network if it is congested? Thanks! Ping can help you understand if a network is congested if it's just a simple

  1   2   >