Does anyone have a simple MPLS configuration they could post?
To solve what problem with MPLS?
My guess is the problem of there being no MPLS config on their router. ;-)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10468t=220
It doesn't look like there are any other subnets left to learn - every
router is configured with the same network statements.
Roger Gore suggested static routes to non-existent routes that point to
null0 as the next hop - this is a good suggestion. I just wanted to point
out the *why* part. :-)
I'm not an expert at dial stuff (yet) and don't have a router in front of
me, but my first thought is: is the router sending the correct SPID? Also,
which debug script output are we looking at here, and what other debugs
could you run? Try running both q931 and q921 - that will cover both L3
Oh cripe, *please* let's not go through the whole Are doohickeys at L2 or
L3 debate again!!
;-)
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
Is that a layer 2 or 3?
-Original
Sounds like a cross between 2001 and Fight Club...
Tyler: Any first-generation computer.
HAL: UNIVAC. I'd fight UNIVAC.
- Original Message -
From: hal9001
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
Jack, this conversation
A former employee is groaning over here over that one... ;-)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
Shouldn't that now be Open the pod nortel doors, HAL?
Sorry.
JMcL
I dunno, we're still waiting. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ? [7:9864]
What's the normal convergence time in EIGRP ?
Message Posted at:
I'm not quite clear on what you're trying to accomplish here.
Since R1 doesn't have any external neighbors, I don't think you'd configure
it to set any community strings. R5 is not in AS300, and therefore can't
force the routers in AS300 to prepend anything. It looks like you're trying
to
You know, I couldn't agree more with this. I sat down one day to read
Pepelnjak's MPLS novella from Cisco Press, but by page 100 I said to myself,
Am I missing something here?? ;-)
Can anyone else recommend an easy-to-read tutorial on MPLS? Or is that an
oxymoron? ;-)
BJ
- Original
Sounds like you've got it. AS 100 sends a route to AS 200 with the
no-export tag set. AS 200 takes the route, and uses it, but doesn't send
it out to AS 300. AS 300 is either kept in the dark, or learns about the
route via a different path.
- Original Message -
From: Rossetti, Stan
If you want it to work, it does. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Jim Brown
To: 'Bradley J. Wilson' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: No-Export [7:9565]
Ahh, but does the neighbor/peer configuration include the send community
statement
People who send flames or retorts to flames are just like people who blow
themselves up in terrorist attacks: they think they're getting revenge, when
really they're the cause of the problem.
If it ain't Cisco-related, keep it private. 'Nuff said.
- Original Message -
From: Peter I.
There's nothing here at the moment, but I've written to McGraw-Hill and
asked them where to submit errata, or possibly contact the authors.
http://www.osborne.com/certification_career/007212766X/007212766X.shtml
BJ
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9120t=9120
After going through the first lab (BGP), here are some of the errors I've
encountered:
p. 16 - chart shows three routers all connected to S0 interface of a
frame-relay switch.
p. 17 - chart lists Loopback 0 twice. This could mean multinetting a
loopback (which I'm not even sure is possible),
I agree whole-heartedly, but I really don't want to have to wade through a
bunch of paper certs suck postings on this newsgroup again!!
- Original Message -
From: JC
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 7:28 PM
Subject: Passing Exams without a lab!! Read this its a thought
Right now I'm dealing with a situation in which my company has two redundant
frame relay links to Botany Australia. One through Sprint, and the other
through ATT. We were experiencing really bad latency on the ATT link (up
to 1.2 seconds), so I moved all the traffic over to the Sprint link once
Let me repeat the wording, with the emphasis elsewhere: ...or obtain from
any other source other than Cisco *THE* exam materials, questions or
answers.
In other words, if someone goes and takes the Lab, and brings along a James
Bond-like photocopier in their wristwatch, makes a copy of *THE*
I second this recommendation - lotsa errors, but they're not crippling and
the labs are still very eye-opening.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Borghese
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: CCIE lab prep. Is there a syllabus? [7:8385]
Check out:
To: 'Bradley J. Wilson'
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:34 AM
Subject: RE: Bridging IRB versus CRB [7:8331]
I understand this fully but it states in the Baer Wolf CCIE 350-001 Routing
Switching Prep
Traffic from each group of interfaces cannot be switched between groups
unless either of the following
How about a fully-meshed, one-subnet topology?
- Original Message -
From: No Data
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:20 PM
Subject: frame relay DLCIs [7:8611]
I was playing around with a router here at work before
I have to put it into production. I've got a serial
Whenever I hear someone arguing the ARP: L2 or L3 point, I remind them
that they're trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Remember that the
OSI reference model was designed around one protocol suite and one protocol
suite only: OSI! Trying to apply any other protocol suite to it - be it
I just got through learning about this myself over the past couple of
weeks - I was working a lab problem that was kicking my a$$, but I got
through it. Here's how I look at the basics, though - in an evolutionary
pattern:
1) Think of your basic, not-overly-bright router. You can either have
Insert your own Master/slave relationship comment here.
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: Errata for Howard's Designing Addressing Architectures
[7:8424]
I know exactly how you feel. When it comes to
One of my new books that I've been using is Satterlee Hutnik's CCIE Lab
Practice Kit, (007212766X - *mucho* mistakes, but not crippling and they
actually make the labs more challenging) and they claim it's As Close As
You Can Get - Satterlee's a CCIE (3980). Now, I've worked through the
first
Folks, folks, folks...
I've said it once, and I'll say it a million times: binary math is *easy* to
do with a pencil, paper, and practice. You will not be allowed to take any
sort of calculator with you into any written exam or The Lab except for
the one between your ears. Besides, if you need
I'll be happy to send you my hourly rate, and any travel/hotel stay is on
you. ;-)
(In other words, please don't abuse the free tech support vibe this place
gives off, mmmkay? :-)
- Original Message -
From: Ravi Varma
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 5:30 PM
Subject:
One thing I'm curious about, and this is because I've found this to be an
invaluable tool to use while studying various lab scenarios - are the PCs in
the lab full Windows 9x/2k installations, including Notepad? I've found
that making a consolidated list of interfaces and associated IP
As is quite common, in this situation we must apply The Berkowitz
Interrogative...
Sounds like a Ludlum novel.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7849t=7849
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
At the risk of sounding juvenile...is this gonna be on the test? ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Jim Dixon
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: Catalyst 5000 series from where? [7:7533]
Page 212 says Kalpana.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel
Okay, two things -
One - abduct a Cisco marketing rep, tie them to a chair, shine a bright, hot
light in their face and ask *them* what the difference is.
Two - while they're tied up, ask them what wire-speed is supposed to mean.
- Original Message -
From: Sam
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reminds me of a gag suggestion from George Carlin:
You drive to a Jack-In-the-Box drive-thru. You place your order, drive up
to the window. The guy hands you your bag and says $2.52. You pay him,
leave, and drive to the nearest Jack-In-The-Box. You drive up to the
speaker, and give the *same
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bradley J. Wilson
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
Forgive my cynicism, but any CCIE *would* want the lab to be tougher - they
would know that any CCIEs that came along after they received their number
is that it should be more of a
dog-eat-dog world than a world where we're allowed to cooperate and share
knowledge.
Am I wrong? If so, why?
- Original Message -
From: Louie Belt
To: Bradley J. Wilson
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 8:56 PM
Subject: RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7
Forgive my cynicism, but any CCIE *would* want the lab to be tougher - they
would know that any CCIEs that came along after they received their number
increase the supply, thus lowering the cost of the good. ;-)
I think Cisco ought to be asking companies who *hire* CCIEs what skills
*they* would
What we're dealing with here is a problem with Cisco documentation that goes
back centuries, and has never been corrected.
Split Horizon and Poison Reverse are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. They do not work
together, they are *alternatives*, similar to how ISL and 802.1Q are
alternatives which do
That's correct, that it advertises a route out the same interface that it
learned it on. The only difference is that it advertises the route at a
cost of 15. When the receiving router gets the update, it adds 1 to the hop
count, putting it up to 16 (unreachable).
Why it does this is the same
For one thing, EIGRP imports IPX hop count as the external metric - the
rest of the metric is the standard EIGRP metric (bw delay, etc.).
Secondly, hop count is used as a tie breaker in IPX - ticks (delay) is the
primary metric in IPX.
I think. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: YY
To:
Last person to show some maturity is a rotten egg.
- Original Message -
From: Donald B Johnson jr
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie seeking advice [7:4412]
Jim I see your point, but it don't make sense.
Oh, them big letters was a nice
The bean-counters love numbers, so give it to them in terms of numbers:
Our routers can either spend their time advertising X number of /22 routes,
or they can save a lot of CPU cycles by advertising just one /19 route -
it's up to you.
After that, it's in their hands, and either way, you
Not really an answer, more of a follow-up question: those of you who have
used the ccbootcamp labs, *how* did you use them? Did you go through them
page-by-page, studying each concept as it came up, or did you use them to
simulate a CCIE-like test - e.g., you sit down at a rack of routers, open
I wonder what there problem is. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Allen May
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: hi [7:4536]
We apparently assimilated a bad speller. The collective is contaminated.
- Original Message -
From: Feargal Ledwidge
Survey says...he's got a CCIE number. And yourself?
- Original Message -
From: Q
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: CCIE #7354 - for Jeff McCoy [7:3998]
Yeah, but what do u do for a living? And do you have any real experience and
to what extent?
I can't help but note that the posters below say that the CCIE isn't as
necessary or valid as it used to be...and yet continue to put CCIE
Written under their credentials. :-)
- Original Message -
From: Robert Nelson-Cox
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 6:16 AM
Carroll Kong wrote:
...but also makes you wonder if the market space is really that
big for heavy duty core work.
I just did an impromptu and informal search on geekfinder.com - I put in the
word Cisco and pulled up 905 jobs nationwide, both contract and perm.
Then I did the same search for
Drew wrote:
It can be, and it is. But, so is just about everything. It is the
probability of the risk being exploited that really matters, and in
this case I see that as a small one. Now, lets talk about using
Microsoft as a security benchmark... ;-)
Reminds me of an obscure Steve Martin
Two things that jump to mind:
1) is the interface shutdown?
2) would a map statement on the interface pointing to its own IP address
help? I've seen this needed before, but I can't recall in which context.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
It sounds like you want to create a VLAN, assign ports to the VLAN, and then
assign a single IP address to the VLAN. If this is the case, try this:
int 1/1 [repeat on whichever interfaces you want]
bridge vlan 1
circuit VLAN1
ip address 192.168.1.1 /24
That should pretty much do it -
Um...Paul, if you would, please ban this guy. :-) Thanks.
Johnny, what parting gifts do we have for our contestant?...
- Original Message -
From: william ward
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: NEED CCIE in the WEST VIRGINIA AREA [7:2919]
Bigotry and tiny-mindedness are often hard for a computer to spot.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Wigle
To: Bradley J. Wilson ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: NEED CCIE in the WEST VIRGINIA AREA [7:2919]
I wanted to jump in but I also didn't
The first step in becoming a CCSI is proven ability to search mail list
archives.
...oh, sorry...better luck next time. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Sujal G. Ajmera
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 6:38 AM
Subject: Cisco Certified Systems Instructor [7:1841]
First you stand over the counter and unzip your fly...
Oh, wait - what exactly are you asking about? ;-)
- Original Message -
From: JackeyXie
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 6:46 AM
Subject: How do ip accounter ? [7:1583]
hi all:
how do ip accounter?
FAQ, list
I've got it...it's so-so. He actually covers EGP, saying it's sometimes
still used in military networks. He spends a lot of time on BGP which, if
you have Halabi (which you should if you're on this list ;-) you don't
really need, but he also spends some time on NAT and IP multicasting - which
"Throat-wobbler mangrove."
- Original Message -
From: andyh
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: How to pronounce NANOG? [7:97]
"haven't you got anything better to do?"
- Original Message -
From: "JP"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 8:48
Okay, Arthur? Everyone knows. Now *hush*. Thanks. :-)
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Simplina
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Pre-sales consultant [7:159]
To [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is interesting. But problem is
It occurred to me that a huge time-saver (especially in The Lab) would be to
create an alias in the routers which would ping all the desired destinations
in your network. That way, rather than sit there and ping x, then ping y,
etc., you could just type in the alias, and away it would go.
So
I've only heard this phrase used in conjunction with routing protocols - you
can run OSPF and BGP on the same router, but they won't have anything to do
with one another (like ships in the night) unless you configure
redistribution explicitly.
Although I suppose it could also be applied to
I think we're looking at yet *another* example of management's belief that
technology can work miracles.
Jesus Christ, CCIE #
- Original Message -
From: Butler, Gary
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: Job Opening Senior Network Engineer
Page 192 of Caslow: there's a config there that shows the line "dialer map
snapshot 60 2002." My question is, what is this "60" and where did it come
from? The next page shows the output from "show snapshot," and it says "For
dialer address 60," but that doesn't really explain a whole lot. I
n
60 is active time, for the rouer end to end to exchange routing update
between server and client.
2002 is quiet time, router freeze, until next active period.
""Bradley J. Wilson"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
00cd01c0bac3$16b00f80$fd02f7a5@bwilson">news:00cd01c0bac
This one's kicking my ass. Should be simple, but apparently it isn't. I've
got three routers in a frame relay configuration: R3 is the hub, R4 and R5
are the spokes. For some reason the routes aren't being exchanged the way
they should be, in spite of the fact that all the OSPF adjacencies
Below you'll find the FR switch configuration (important parts, anyway).
Also, s0.2 on R3 is a point-to-point PVC to another router (R6).
In the last hour, I've actually gotten the OSPF to work correctly by using
"ip ospf priority" statements. What was happening was that R4 (a spoke) was
always
- Original Message -
From: Groupstudy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 2:53 AM
Subject: Re: Router problem
Show us your configs.
Hey now, this isn't Mardi Gras... ;-)
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
The command "no ipx routing" will clear up *all* your troubles. ;-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: Nabil Fares
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:32 PM
Subject: IPX Help
Greetings all,
I'm trying to find out how routers treat IPX traffic, is there any type of
I think the only way to make FR redundant with one router would be to have
the PVCs going to different providers. HSRP will only work with two routers
over a LAN. I think your best option is to stick an ISDN BRI port in the
3640 and use it if the FR fails (which it *will* at some point ;-).
Huh?
Can you give a more concrete example of what's going on? We may be able to
help you better. :-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: Hyman, Craig
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 11:12 AM
Subject: Need the statements for 1601 router/proxy
Can someone tell me the
Sounds like somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed, more like.
Re-read Santosh's first line again. Closely.
- Original Message -
From: Groupstudy
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: A design problem of switched network
How on earth can you
Also, when you send a ping, what is the response? If it's a "destination
net not found," then check your routing tables along the path to the target.
If it's a "destination host not found," then your target isn't alive for
some reason. If it's "request timed out," then check your routing tables
I have
had CCNA, CCNP, and yes even CCIE written folks who
could not tell me what they 'should' acutally know.
Maybe it's just me, but comments like this have always bothered me,
regardless of whatever cert program we're talking about.
This might come off as a little stronger than I intend
The "area range" command only works when you're redistributing between OSPF
areas - from area 1 into area 0, for example. In your scenario, you're
redistributing from OSPF into a completely different protocol that doesn't
know what the heck an "area" is. In order to do this redistribution, try
ArcNet lives!!! ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Lance Hubbard
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco share in downfall
Sure,
My Manager told me to stop work on all new network projects, and implement
the following solution for full-mesh,
Can anyone out there enlighten me on how to set up a frame relay simulator?
What equipment options are available, and the actual configs on the
equipment? Thanks in advance.
BJ
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
lol...thanks for saying something that's been on my mind for a while now.
:-)
- Original Message -
From: Jason Witover
snip
Is CCIE-Written a certification? Did you put that on your
business card?? =Þ
snip
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
jesus...sounds like Bill Gates just hired on as VP of Marketing or
something...should I be ashamed to be a CCNP/DP now??
- Original Message -
From: Net Bum
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: more Cisco Kool-Aid!
This is sad...
I hereby volunteer my services, free of charge, to interview Eliza Dushku.
About anything. Please?
:-)
- Original Message -
From: Natasha
To: CCIE Group study list
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:18 PM
Subject: Ooo Priscilla!!!
Priscilla Oppenheimer interviews Fabio on
Actually, here's what I've been doing as of last week (only *after* I've
spent like $500 on books...)
Take a notebook to the bookstore, and write down the names of all the
chapters. Then come back home and look up all those chapter names on CCO.
You'll find a *lot* of what's in those books can
Okay, I have to vent here. This kind of question really bugs me. And not
because of the answer, which I agree with. It just bugs me because the
question assumes all routing protocols behave in the exact same way, when in
fact they do not. My first thought when I read this question was "Hey -
I just want Jar Jar dead. Am I asking too much here? ;-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: W. Alan Robertson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Star Wars
Understand this... I am a Star Wars freak.
I haven't a clue how Lucas is going to pull
Looks like the new MIME software is removing the equal signs...and all the
rest of the text!
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Yes...you're alive, my Baron..."
Spoken by the late, great Jack Nance.
- Original Message -
From: adam lee
To: 'SAM Meng Wai' ; 'David Richard' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: Am I alive??
Nah, your dead, and I am the grim reaper..
:-D
This is just a guess, but how about setting the next hop in the route-map to
the IP address of ISP A?
- Original Message -
From: Jacek Malinowski
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:27 AM
Subject: Route-map
I have a big problem with the
rom: Nigel van Tura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 7:29 AM
To: Bradley J. Wilson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Lou Rossi's Token Ring paper
But Bradley
If we connect all to the MAU as a central hub then it becomes a physical
star and a logical r
The rendezvous point is an element in a multicasting environment - can't
recall which protocol off the top of my head, it's probably either PIM-DM
or -SM.
The designated router is an element of OSPF on a broadcast network
(ethernet, token ring, etc.). The other routers on the network form their
about the difference.
BJ
- Original Message -----
From: Bradley J. Wilson
To: cisco
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: Difference between Rendezvous Point ,Designated Router
The rendezvous point is an element in a multicasting environment - can't
recall which protocol off the
Okay, but let's look at this in financial terms: you get your CCIE, and sign
on to some six-figure job doing whatever. What does the MS on top of that
gain you?
Is there anyone on the list who's had *firsthand* experience gaining an MS
after getting their CCIE, and if so, what the percentage
Someone wrote:
I get chills when I think how similar cisco is to Microsoft...
Nah, I disagree - they're worlds apart. First of all, neither one is a
monopoly - the DoJ has their head up their ass. Secondly, Cisco's response
to bugs is "Whoops, there's a bug in our software - here's the
I won't say how old I am, but I will say this:
Young enough not to care too much about the way things used to be
I'm young enough to remember the future, the past has no claim on me
I'm old enough not to care too much about what you think of me
But I'm young enough to remember the future, the
ElephantChild wrote:
RFC 1918, section 3:
"[...]Because private addresses have no global meaning, routing
information
about private networks shall not be propagated on inter-enterprise
links, *and packets with private source or destination addresses
should not be forwarded across
Take a look at Halabi (First Edition) p. 300, and riddle me this regarding
Figure 10-1:
How does network 192.68.12.0 get into RTF's routing table? The EBGP session
needs to be established before RTF can accept any routes from RTD. But how
can the session be established before RTF knows how to
. There would not be a 192.168.12.0 network in
F's routing table unless D has the statement 'network 192.168.12.0' in its
own BGP routing process allowing it to advertise that network to other As'.
- Original Message -
From: Bradley J. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cisco [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris
I'm with you, Phil. Lou, if you're out there...any comments?
- Original Message -
From: Phil Barker
To: Bradley J. Wilson ; cisco
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: Lou Rossi's Token Ring paper
I favour a physical star (Hub/Spoke) and a logical
ring.
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Tony van Ree
At 51 I passed the CCNP I wanted it. I am now looking at CCIE but not
sure if I really want it and am stuggling.
Well, let's put it this way...are you able to write your own salary already?
If you are, then don't worry about the CCIE. ;-) I
Careful, we're getting into PETA territory again... ;-)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 5:34 PM
Subject: OT: RE: Speaking of Routers on a stick
Personally, the phrase always reminds me of C.M.O.T. Dibbler's rat onna
Well, I'm 27...but most of the people I work with have *children* my age,
so...no, I don't think age is a problem at all. Besides, have you seen the
new Craft-matic adjustable equipment racks they have now? ;-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: rtc
To: Cisco ; CISCO GROUPSTUDY ; CISCO
I find myself sitting here wondering if I could actually say this in my
classes...I'm already pushing the envelope I think by using the "Princess Di
Never Tried to Sleep with Prince Andrew" mnemonic for the OSI Model, and one
of these days I'm going to have someone from PETA in my class when I
I'm sitting here reading Lou Rossi's Token Ring paper, and right off the bat
I have a question:
He says that token ring is "a physical ring and a logical bus" - but isn't
this backward? Isn't it a physical bus and a logical ring? We're not
physically connecting stations together in a ring -
e who wants to jump in, feel free - I am by no means an expert on
security - this is just how I understand it. :-)
Bradley J. Wilson
CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, NNCSS, CNX, MCT, CTT
- Original Message -
From: Nabil Fares
To: Bradley J. Wilson
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2001 11:07 AM
Subject: R
ds to a frame as it goes across a serial
link? Maybe someone else has a better answer, but in my experience it
hasn't mattered. But in this case, it will matter *if* you're running OSPF
and *if* you're doing a lot of heavy filtering.
Thanks,
Chris
More than welcome. :-)
Bradley J. Wilson
CC
, though.
Good luck -
Bradley J. Wilson
CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, CNX, NNCSS, MCT, CTT
- Original Message -
From: Shane Stockman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: VLAN question
I will just like to enquire whether it is possible to have a VLAN split over
2 lans
I would also emphasize that the functionality of the "DR" is an *interface*
thing, not a router thing. A router might be the DR on one interface, but
it might not be the DR on another interface (in fact, this is good design -
you don't want the router to be burdened with having to be the DR on a
Your assumption is correct: the "bandwidth" parameter has no bearing on the
actual speed of the line. If your provider is giving you 256k, then you'll
run at 256k. However, the router will *assume* that you're running at T1
speed by default, and will use that bandwidth (1.544mbps) in its
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
