If you're trying to use the modular QoS CLI on subinterfaces its
something of a mess - you have to create 'backpressure' at the physical
interface level so bandwidth available is less than what your policy
needs, or everything stays FIFO.
I had a production network with this issue and I
This stuff is covered in gory detail in the Caslow book - I wouldn't
have completed my CCNP/CCDP with that.
Rich wrote:
Could someone help a CCNP student who is really confused? I am currently
studying for the BSCI Routing Exam using the Sybex Books on a home Lab of 4
2500's and 1 2600.
You can install an NM-HSSI and an external E3 CSU/DSU or use an
internal NM-1TE3 to terminate a clear channel link.
Cisco also built an NM-1A-E3 ATM card as well. In the US the DS3
counterpart to this card was typically used for DSL providers, while the
clear channel card or HSSI + external
I've seen situations where the legal length has been nearly doubled
on full duplex connections without much apparent trouble. I don't know
if I'd trust a Windoze box in this kind of configuration, but routers,
unix hosts, etc, don't seem to mind too much.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a
Windows *sucks*. I've seen it act stupid in lots of situations where a
FreeBSD laptop with the exact same configuration works just fine. I
don't have a technical explanation - I'm attributing it to excessive bad
karma.
Dom wrote:
I've seen situations where the legal length has been nearly
I think there are some implications with the ISDN interface being in
backup mode - like IOS idling the interface. You could just use a
floating static route to dodge that issue - works as long as you don't
mind the ISDN not being tied to the serial interface and the effect
should be the same -
The WIC-1DSU-T1 is a service module - it always appear as serial0/0 or
whatever, and if you do anything with timeslots you are just adjusting
the number used for this one serial interface.
The NM-1CT1 is a channelized T1 interface. You must configure one or
more channels in a channel group,
DON'T TRUST THE CODE ON THE 35XX SERIES SWITCHES.
Sorry for yelling, but its that important. I've seen repeated
situations like this:
router switch 1 switch 2
With a daisy chained configuration like this I've seen multiple
instances where a vlan that is done correctly on the router
I just heard a viscious rumor on the nanog mailing list - there are
some images for the 26xx that support MPLS!@!@!@!@!
I am mostly done with studies for the BSCI and QoS+Mcast - only
barrier to me getting CCIP was getting my sticky little paws on routers
that support MPLS - if there is
store, etc???
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
I've seen the angels wearing their disguise,
ordinary people leading ordinary lives - Tracy Chapman
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
, I am
an
Engineer on Networked peripherals, which is what has got me interested in
this
field in the first place. I passed my CCNA earlier this year. Any advice
most
gratefully accepted.
Dave
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
to see if its stolen? I don't want to
possess stolen equipment, and I definitely don't want to find that out
when/if I sell it after I pass the Lab. Thanks for any and all advice--
John
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
/scprt4/scipsec.htm#xtocid2141729
HTH
Nigel
- Original Message -
From: Neal Rauhauser
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: IPsec - what is wrong with this config? [7:52865]
I have two 1750s sharing an ethernet hub - just trying to get IPsec on
a tunnel
destination 192.168.1.50
tunnel mode ipip
crypto map BOTTOM2
!
interface Serial0
ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0
clockrate 100
!
interface FastEthernet0
ip address 192.168.1.51 255.255.255.0
speed auto
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto
port as
another ethernet port .. then what is the purpose of this interface
Regards
Paul ...
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
I've seen the angels wearing their disguise,
ordinary people
preparation?? The reason I am asking is because someone offered me a 2nd
hand MC3810, but I just wasn't sure whether I will need it or not.
Any help or comments would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
H.
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL
somewhere on net, peered with both
ASes using ebgp multihop and a private AS might just be a good solution
- apply same policies to it that I apply at the borders of the other
networks and see what comes from it.
At 12:17 AM 9/2/2002 +, Neal Rauhauser wrote:
I'll start this out by saying
I just did a quick look around my network and 'clns routing' doesn't
seem to work on any of the routers (16xx, 17xx, 26xx) I have in
operation. Is there a particular image train one needs to run or some
trick to getting ISIS working?
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice
There are some old IPv6 beta images running around out there that have
crazy stuff like OSPF/BGP in the image for the Cisco 1000 series routers
- anyone got this stuff lying around? I just dusted off a 1003 and I'd
like it to do more than just access duty in the lab.
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP
than twenty hours in the last month, after two years of ignoring all
BSCI issues except BGP/OSPF which I use for work, and I'm surprised that
these tests are telling me I'm nearly ready to go.
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Thanx
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
I've seen the angels wearing their disguise,
ordinary people leading ordinary lives - Tracy Chapman
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i
- anyone got any
helpful suggestions?
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
I've seen the angels wearing their disguise,
ordinary people leading ordinary lives - Tracy Chapman
Message Posted at:
http
, is a good start. It's
freeware,
but you need to compile the C++ on a UNIX box. There may be some looking
glasses that make it available -- I'd hunt around at ISI.edu and merit.edu
as a
start.
http://www.isi.edu/ra/RAToolSet
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301
quiet on the topic - I did find this one
URL below with google - can anyone initiate me into the mysteries of
CCSI? How much does it cost for the test? What are the requirements for
a 'learning partner'???
http://64.139.25.96/Internal/CCSICert.htm
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP
===
Thanks
Joseph
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL
Yes, this is a real image that I downloaded for real work - can anyone
top it?
c1700-bk8no3r2sy7-mz.122-8.T5.bin
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
I've seen the angels wearing their disguise
How do I send a break via reverse telnet? I've never figured this one
out and I've got a situation now were this would be really handy to do.
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
Message Posted
logging facility 23
logging host inside 192.168.11.4
FreeBSD
local7.debug/var/log/cisco.all
I also startes syslogd with these parameters
29612 ?? Ss 0:00.03 syslogd -a 192.168.11.2/255.255.255.0
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP
63.170.238.254 0100 0 i
* 63.170.237.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
* i63.170.238.0/24 63.170.238.254 0100 0 i
* 12.108.207.150 20 32768 i
*i63.170.239.0/24 63.170.239.254 0100 0 i
--
Neal
), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), or Routing
Information Protocol
(RIP) is used.
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're
a twerp
points are powered.
Has anybody faced problem like this.
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Neil
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're
/wireless/airo_350/accsspts/a
p350rn/rn1121.htm#xtocid14
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
This is my private email devoted to various mailing lists. If you're
a twerp with an attorney and someone else's money
I've got this UBR924 (ethernet, cable, two FXS voice ports) that I
haven't used in a long time. I'm considering ebaying it, but I'd rather
get a BR/AP/WGB35x in exchange. Anyone interested?
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
awareness?
Specifically, are there compatibility issues running VoIP between an
MC38010
with an FXO module running IOS 12.1.14 IP Plus, and a 1750 with an FXS
module
running 12.1.14 IP Voice Plus?
thanks
dj
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL
to complete CCNP.
I would be appreciating if any one clarifies my doubts.
Thanks
Shravan
-
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Steal it out of a 2500 you're not using :-) Its the same stuff.
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Hey guys,
Anyone have a good source for CAT5K SUP1 Ram?
Thanks,
Symon
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-301-9555
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc
-list cache entries using 3804 bytes of memory
BGP activity 1731/6097 prefixes, 1888/895 paths, scan interval 60 secs
NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
12.22.183.193 4 203331941 107 308700 01:42:49
991
--
Neal
I spent about twenty hours last week dorking around with AP35x and
BR35x, MRTG, and snmpwalk on a unix box.
I've created some MRTG configs that will graph common 802.11b errors
vs good fragments and I posted the MIBs used along with links to two MIB
browsers that will produce the OIDs you need
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 4:07 PM -0400 6/16/02, Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555 wrote:
My only explanation for this is that there was nothing good on TV on a
lazy Sunday morning ...
I am about to start doing some truly gruesome things with IBGP due to
geographical separate peering
I am using cisconf from CPAN.org - its a modifiable perl module for
doing backups to a tftp server.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46239t=46239
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
This one is just too juicy to pass up :-)
The concise question is Why would you use linux/freebsd or an appliance
based on
them instead of purchasing a real router?
Cisco rules the backbone, they do enough on lan switching to get my vote
their, and
their Aironet radios are OK if you're
There is one sensible argument against what I've said, but this isn't it.
Try again
and put some thought into it.
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
No one ever accused cisco of being a charity...
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555 wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">new
Does anyone have any of the old IPv6 beta images for 16xx series?
These would be the ones that provided BGP on access routers :-) I have a
ton of 1605s hanging around so I am whipping up a little lab.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46009t=46009
This one is taking full routes from UUNet and ATT without any special
configuration.
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IS-M), Version 12.1(5)T7, RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/ibld/view.pl?i=support
Copyright (c)
This is a 2650 getting full routes from ATT and UUNet with a T1 to each
provider.
Total: 101929412, Used: 67234276, Free: 34695136
PID TTY Allocated FreedHoldingGetbufsRetbufs Process
0 0 75536 18084650980 0 0 *Init*
0 0752
Does anyone know what this thing does? I've been using 12.2T for IPv6
support and I just noticed the image below, labeled IP PLUS IPSEC 56
WIRELESS - is that for the 5.8 gig wireless NM? Anyone using this stuff
in the field?
c2600-ik8sw6-mz.122-8.T4.bin
Message Posted at:
I recently asked who was doing CCIP and got a raft of responses - Its
just like the CCNP, Just got get your CCIE, It doesn't make sense.
Rather than continuing that thread I thought I'd highlight the
differences and mention why the CCIP is more interesting than CCIE in
many cases.
The
- no reason not to get it done if I am going to do the
reading anyway.
I am curious to know the stats - how many people have completed this
cert? I was about #1500 on CCDP and I'd like to think I'll be able to
better that on the CCIP.
Neal Rauhauser
Message Posted at:
http
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930
http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26637t=26637
this - drop me a note at
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930
http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
of Market Network Solutions, was a pleasure to deal with.
If anyone is in the market for used equipment, you might want to keep an
eye
out for this guy on That Auction Site.
NOTE: past performance is no guarantee of future results ;-
Chuck
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP
://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice: 402-391-3930
http://AmericanRelay.comfax : 402-951-6390
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fcc : k0bsd
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23825t
, a MC3810 T1/E1 card, a lot of cosmetic
spares for 7505/7507 chassis, etc. If any of this sounds interesting
drop me a note ... be sure to use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - send
it to this account and you're entering mailing list purgatory :-)
--
Neal Rauhauser CCNP, CCDP voice
I have this configuration in production:
branch office lan cisco 2611 Cisco 7206 running BGP Cisco 2611 branch
office lan
I have a /24 from one of my three BGP peers which is used for most
everything in my
network and there is a sloppy deploy of RFC1918 private addresses on two
branch
More is never enough. This obvious truth being stated, we'll move on
to the details of our latest 'event' :-)
Using reverse telnet to 24.3.233.101 with a userid and password of
'ebay' you will find the following toys
port 2008Catalyst 5000 /w WS-X5530-E2 NFFC supervisor 3 engine
port
Your very urgent problem is going to require NEW BOOT ROMS for your 26xx.
I have encountered this bug before and there isn't a good way around it
if you need
to use tftp. I escaped my troubles by borrowing a Cisco 2650 that had newer
boot roms
and using it to load the flash for my impaired
There was nothing good on TV tonight so I assembled a fairly
complete Catalyst lab for people to check out - its available at these
addresses
24.3.233.101 2008Catalyst 2926T
24.3.233.101 2007Cisco 4500 /w Fast Ethernet
24.3.233.101 2006Cisco
I have two Catalyst 2926s that are ebay bound but I don't have
time to put the auctions up at the moment so I put them up for a few
days so some of you aspiring CCNPs who can't afford these toys get a
chance to play.
They can be reached at these locations with the userid and password
both
I was rooting around in the debris field I call my office looking
for my digital camera so I could auction those Catalyst 2926s and I came
up with a pair of Catalyst 2600s - token ring switches.
I got these things thinking they might be like the much feared
Catalyst 3900 which has never
The MC3810 bug bit me real hard today - I picked up another MC3810,
brought it home, and got busy cleaning up the debris from my CCNP/CCDP.
At the end of the day I kept a 2511, a 2525 with a sync serial port, a
MC3810-V with a T1 port and DSPs, and a MC3810-3V with T1 port.
I
I've never spammed the list before with stuff I am selling but I
am quite proud of this 1750 - specifically:
1750-2V, 48 meg of dram, PVDM-4, vic-2fxs, wic-1t, wic-1b-u - VoIP, sync
serial, and ISDN all in one neat little package. The only way this could
be better is if the 10/100 port
100 questions, took me 32 of 120 minutes allowed, and I walked out
with an 839 and my spiffy new CCDP :-)
The exam has the following sections and I've listed my scores
1 Intro to Internetwork Design62%
2 Campus LAN design62%
3 TCP/IP network design
I passed my BCMSN yesterday with a 934 and as a special present to
myself I scheduled the CIT exam early this morning.
I did basically zero preparation for the test. I spent the $30 for
the boson.com exam for CIT because boson's stuff has been a very
reliable indicator of readiness
I took the BCMSN this afternoon and exited the testing center
with a very surprising 934.
Background:
I have a couple of years time in grade with cat 19xx/28xx, about
the same more recently with 29xx/35xx, and I once worked for three
months on an incredibly psychotic Cat
I had something kind of ugly happen at work today and I
thought I'd share the details.
I have two DS1s in our office that leads to our border 7206 which
is in a colocated rack. One runs to a 2611, the other to a 2621. I have
two Cat 3524s tied together with a copper gigabit
As a minimum you need a Supervisor III with a NFFC. The NFFC is a WS-F5521 as
opposed to the more expensive NFFC2 WS-F5531/5531A daughtercard.
You can use an external router to do the job that the RSM does different
environments but you can learn enough to pass using a 2620 as
If my boson.com test scores are an indicator I am going to scoot
through BCMSN come Monday without a lot of trouble.
We're running a variety of cat stuff at work and I no longer feel
the need to keep the Cat 5000 I've been using so I am going to offer it
for sale/trade.
I have
I don't know if anyone else noticed but there *IS* an image
for the little Cisco 1000 series boxes that does OSPF and BGP.
I am running the old 11.3 based IOS IPv6 beta image and it works
great. The 12.0 based IPv6 image, besides being too large to fit on the
2 meg flash you
I changed jobs a few months back and as part of my new duties I get
to learn a lot about IPv6.
I have a Cisco 7206 VXR 300 that is dedicated to being an IPv6
access point. The router is part of AS12023 and its connected via
ethernet to our border router that peers with UUNet (AS701),
They're the same
ws-x5530-e1 - has a ws-f5511 or ws-f5520 EARL daughtercard
ws-x5530-e2/e2a has a ws-f5521/ws-f5521a netflow feature card
ws-x5530-e3/e3a has a ws-f5531/ws-f5531a netflow feature card 2
I don't think this is necessary for the CCIE lab
(yet) and its actually pretty trivial
The little switches have a limited MAC address table. If you know you have a
link where they're going to see more MACs than they can hold you set it to be a
'network' port and the switch doesn't learn MACs from there. This is meant for
a large campus environment where you have a 19xx serving
I have been tinkering with a 2611 and a 2621 with voice gear and I
am tearing my hair out. I see the claimed bandwidth is 8k plus
'overhead' which the Cisco documentation seems to not want to cover in
detail ... apparently the overhead can be double the size of the data
for a total of
This is somewhat off topic ... I am boning up for BCRAN in a
week or two and I am reading the stuff about protocol translation. For
those who aren't this far yet protocol translation is used for allowing
telnet, x25, and lat sessions to interoperate - LAT is nonrouteable so
its
The voice over IP depends on the IP portion of the network working - just set
up the routers as you normally would and the voice traffic will travel just fine.
You do have a potential problem with congestion here, don't you? I am assuming
more than one type of data is using the area of the
flame
It would appear that your contact with the book has so befuddled you that
you've forgotten what a paragraph is.
You're right that there are some problems with the CCIE Lab Study Guide
but its a wonderful tool to have, all in all. I imagine the second version,
which I see
Sounds like you have flow control enabled on the PC port you're using to
connect to the router.
groupstudy wrote:
too bad , i will throw my 2503 out of window ,kiding..,thanks anyway
ElephantChild wrote in message ...
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, groupstudy wrote:
I got a cisco 2503 . I
If you just want to 'bridge' analog phone service this is what you need
- private line automatic ringdown (plar) means that the connection is
established as soon as one end goes off the hook. This is a point to
point config ... if you want to get fancier than this you need to create
a dial
I am running a 7206VXR for our main BGP box. We're colocated with
Level 3 (AS3356) and we have ethernet to them. We have T1s to UUNet
(AS701) and Teleglobe (AS6453).
I am running OSPF for my IGP and everything seems to be working well
there. I have a 7120 in my office that I am using for
For T1 make a cable using cat5 and two RJ45 ends - cross pins 1+2 to pins
4+5 and you've got your T1 crossover.
For 56k CSU/DSUs cross 1+2 and 7+8 if I remember correctly.
Gary Alterson wrote:
Hello all wiser than I:
If I've got two 2600 series routers, both with the Internal
and broadcast, but no host bits
Am I missing something??
-Brad
Brad Beck, CCNA
WAN Administrator
Diva Systems
ipv6 address 3FFE:B00:4007:C12::6/127
At 10:06 PM 5/15/00 -0500, neal rauhauser wrote:
I've colocated a Cisco 7120 at pensat.com and I am working with an
engineer
I have two VoIP capable routers I've been messing with and I am
tearing my hair out.
We've made VoIP calls and thats no big deal but we're having trouble
with the dial plan - what I want to accomplish is this
402-391-2413 - Cisco 1750 /w FXO card -- IP connection -- Cisco 1750
/w FXS
While others have a bigger 'spread' in terms of numbers of routers I
think I have the most liberal employer in terms of letting me walk out
with expensive toys ...
specifically at the moment
Cisco 1003s
Cisco 1750
Cisco 2511
Cisco 2513
Cisco 2516
Cisco 2521
Cisco 2523
Cisco 7120 (deployed
82 matches
Mail list logo
