Did you read trough the
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feat
ure_guide09186a0080087c60.html
12.0
BGP Received Routes MIB
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feat
ure_guide09186a0080110bbc.html
12.2T
BGP 4 MIB Support
Fred R. You're obvious a pretty smart guy. Your posts here are
very well structured and helpful.
Don't put so much stock in the CCNP(NA) vs. bgp.
I had my ccna only a few short months, when we went to multihoming
with BGP.
Do you really think that the small enterprise is going to
u
Hi all,
I wonder if any of you have succesfully retrieved the BGP table from a
Cisco router using SNMP?. I read a lot of documents and tried a lot of
MIBs/OID without any success. I used the MIB navigation tool at the Cisco
TAC but I did not find something really useful. I only could read the
Is it possible to have some sh run, sh ip route, sh ip bgp nei configs
please any two will do.You don't have to give away you IDs for
Thank you
Ollie
AT&T Common Backbone
866-397-7309 Opt 1
-Original Message-
From: JMC Nel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September
Perhaps a config would be helpful. Or do you expect us to use our psychic
abilities to determine the problem? ;-)
>>> JMC Nel 9/3/03 12:29:06 PM >>>
Could someone please assist me? I set up a customer to received the Partial
TABLE but for some reason the customer is receiving the Full Table. I
Could someone please assist me? I set up a customer to received the Partial
TABLE but for some reason the customer is receiving the Full Table. I
checked the filter list but that does not seem to be the problem. Any
assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
GP
_
Matthew,
In your current configuration you have a route-map "com1" with a
sequence of 10 in which BGP will look at first as you recieve updates from
neighbor R1. Now, within that route map you have specified "match ip address
3", so in acl 3 you are PERMITTING 10.3.2.0/2
Hi all,
I have a few problems with configuring route maps in conjunction with BGP.
I have configured a community that advertises all networks except two but
these two networks are still advertised to the peer after doing the clear ip
bgp * command on both peers.
I have read in the Cisco book
Not completely on topic, sorry It is about a router, not a pc box.
Martijn
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jansen, M
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 augustus 2003 8:15
Aan: Eddie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]
What about mobile IP or VPN to border
What about mobile IP or VPN to border router and get an internal IP for the
tftp server's point of view...
Just in a typing mood.
Martijn
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 18 augustus 2003 15:06
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re
HI Eddie, Fred,
thanks for your help...I think this most likely is the problem. As I do not
have access to teh TFTP server, I am unable to fix it though.
cheers,
Matthew.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74130&t=74100
-
email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP Connectivity Problem [7:74100]
Hi all,
I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com
Matthew Webster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com. My network setup is as
> follows:
>
> TFTP_Server-(e0)r1(s0)--(s0)r2
>
> s0 = 192.168.100.0/24 (.1 for r1, .2 for r2) and e0 = 10.1.4.1/24.
>
> The problem is that wh
Hi all,
I have done a sample bgp configuration at r1r2.com. My network setup is as
follows:
TFTP_Server-(e0)r1(s0)--(s0)r2
s0 = 192.168.100.0/24 (.1 for r1, .2 for r2) and e0 = 10.1.4.1/24.
The problem is that while I can ping the TFTP server (10.1.4.3 from Rtr1's
e0 interfac
Internet Routing Architechtures - Second Edition - Sam Halabi
This is a complete BGP guide, and tat is enough to the BGP exam
Regards,
Jose
>From: "juniper"
>Reply-To: "juniper"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516]
>Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2
Here is what I think is the trick to understand Halabi:
It is NOT for entry level people nor is it for people who use it as a
study book for any exam.
That is why the book is called "Internet Routing Architectures" not "BGP
cram session book for the CCXX exams"..The word
""Jose Linero Welcker"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Internet Routing Architechtures - Second Edition - Sam Halabi
>
> This is a complete BGP guide, and tat is enough to the BGP exam
interesting. have not taken the exam yet, so I can't comm
2 before I got to
the BGP section. I should read through it as a refresher and to compare it
to Halabi.
But Dre? Despise?? :-) That's pretty harsh! However, I guess I can
understand your point. BGP can be pretty easy to understand when it's
explained correctly, and can be very difficul
Folks
I have seen a few mentions of the BGP and QOS beta exams recently (also
mentioning the results).
My question is, am I the only person still waiting for results for these
exams? My Vue exam history shows
Tue February 18, 2003 02:30 PM
641-661: BGP
Corefacts, Cambridge, GBR
taken
Thu
ont think there is a problem with my address as I have received results
for CCIE Beta qualification exams I took before and after the QOS and BGP
exams.
Peter
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73759&t=73599
--
**
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam
Mark
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73516&t=73516
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
F
I dont think i agree with you. I really liked Sam Halabi's OSPF Design Guide
and his BGP Case studies. I admit they can be a bit daunting the first time
around, but then they are not meant to be Exam guides.In fact, i really like
the writing style and find myself wishing there were more
Peter,
Yes, you will have to begin chasing VUE and Cisco.
For example, I did BGP Beta on May 30th 2003 and I got a letter about my
passing from Prometric around 20th June 2003. After a few days, it also
appeared in my Tracking System.
The same with BSCI Beta 643-801.
It could have something to
""juniper"" wrote in message ...
> Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam
I personally despise Halabi's "authortative, the BGP-bible" IRA
book. It is awful. It is the sole reason nobody understands BGP.
It's confusing, boring, and downrig
Avi Freedmans BGP presentations are a good source to read but I'd try to
read Routing TCP/IP vol II first and then read the presentations to help
strenghten your understanding of BGP.
I don't believe Freedmans presentations are as detailed as the exam
would like, but if I am wrong then
>>>> juniper 8/5/03 8:32:50 AM >>>
>Hi,
>Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam
>Mark
My two personal favorite BGP books are:
Internet Routing Architectures, 2nd Edition, by Halabi
BGP4: Interdomain Routing in the Internet, by Stewart
If you have a sub
Hello,
I did BGP beta and I found that Internet Routing Architectures does not
cover everything required on the exam, especially if one does not have
hands-on experience. This is the reason I suffered, despite passing the exam
(to my surprise).
You can also supplement with Cisco ISP Essentials
5 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cisco BGP Exam [7:73516]
>
> ""juniper"" wrote in message ...
> > Can anyone recommend a good book for the BGP exam
>
> I personally despise Halabi's "authortative, the BGP-bible" IRA
> bo
At 04:40 PM 7/9/2003 +, Joseph Brunner wrote:
>This horse has been beat dead far too many times. The default
>route must come from EBGP
>so the tag field is populated with meaningful data (last i recall)
Isn't it because of the admin distance?
Thanks,
Zsombor
>I my lab I just know it neve
the router has a
default route learned by another routing protocol, and de second generates a
default route allways.
Joseph are you sure that if the router learns a default route from e-BGP and
you redistribute bgp in ospf it will work? Don't you need a
default-originate command?
Every day I lea
This horse has been beat dead far too many times. The default
route must come from EBGP so the tag field is populated with
meaningful data (last i recall)
I my lab I just know it never works from IBGP>REDIS OSPF
Must be EBGP>OSPF>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
I could not find a doc explaining why a default route learned from BGP is
not redistributed into OSPF.
Any thoughts?
R5#sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA
dre wrote:
> ""KW S"" wrote in message ...
>
>>What is the benefits of receiving the following BGP routes
>>1. Full routes
>>2. Partial routes
>>3. No routes
>
>
> Well #3 means it doesn't work (you need at least a default route,
intain those
routing tables.
And there's this problem of instability in another AS ( with which you'd
be least bothered ) causing route flaps and interrupts on your BGP
router . This issue can be addressed by route summarization and
dampening to a good extent .
Partial routes : This is t
""KW S"" wrote in message ...
> What is the benefits of receiving the following BGP routes
> 1. Full routes
> 2. Partial routes
> 3. No routes
Well #3 means it doesn't work (you need at least a default route, or
0.0.0.0/0), so I'll skip that one.
/www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn12942.html
>
> -Justin M. Morgenthaler
>
> ""KW S"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Dear all
>>
>>What is the benefits of receiving the following BGP routes
>>1. Full routes
>>2. P
I would assume "Convergence" and the avoidance of this:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/fn12942.html
-Justin M. Morgenthaler
""KW S"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dear all
>
> What is the benefits of receiving the following BGP routes
&
Dear all
What is the benefits of receiving the following BGP routes
1. Full routes
2. Partial routes
3. No routes
Regards, kws
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71442&t=71442
--
FAQ, list archi
Everybody - thank you. Sorry for this late answer, got stuck with a problem
in a remote site for some time.
>From what you said I'd think one provider is planning to give us a full BGP
feed (but doesn't charge very much), while the other requires a smaller
router because they want t
At 01:51 PM 6/24/2003 +, p b wrote:
>Someone sent me a pointer off list (thanks Rob) that pointed
>me to the "bgp inject-map" command.
Yes, that's probably a much better suggestion. Wonder why off list..?
Thanks,
Zsombor
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.co
Thanks. Yea, this is a real design.
Can't do the /25 statics to the entity that IGP advertises the
/24 as there are dual links and multiple hops and certain failure
scenarios will cause traffic to get blackholed.
Someone sent me a pointer off list (thanks Rob) that pointed
me to the
>I'd like to advertise x.x.x.0/25 and x.x.x.128/25. When
>I config three network statements for these subnets in BGP,
>only the /24 seems to be sent to the one iBGP peer.
>
>If I define a static null route for each subnet (x.x.x.0/24,
>x.x.x.0/25, and x.x.x.128/25), all thre
Thanks, I appreciate your comments.
Zsombor
At 01:36 PM 6/23/2003 -0500, MADMAN wrote:
>>>>> Were the two T1's terminating at two differant ISP's? If so BGP
>>>>>would be appropriate. If you have 2 T1's terminating at a single ISP in
>>>&
>>>>Were the two T1's terminating at two differant ISP's? If so BGP
>>>> would be appropriate. If you have 2 T1's terminating at a single
>>>> ISP in
>>>> the same POP then no.
>>>
>>>
>>> What would
At 09:34 AM 6/23/2003 -0500, MADMAN wrote:
>Zsombor Papp wrote:
>>At 08:26 PM 6/20/2003 +, MADMAN wrote:
>>
>>>Mark E. Hayes wrote:
>>> > NOT being a wise-a$$ here... When is it appropriate to run BGP? I set
it
>>> > up at the last job
Grant,
Thanks for your suggestion, though I am not sure what the 350-001 exam is
all about - CCIE written?
Honestly, I doubt whether that is my goal.I will not be able to get the
necessary equipment to play with.
Also, in my country, I will be overqualified :)
That is correct: in some count
reached my apartment, there was a letter from Cisco
> (well, from Prometric) that I had passed BGP Beta with
> 827/1000, passing score 755. BGP was such a challenging exam
> (to me).
>
> Now, I will begin studying MPLS and QoS to become a CCIP.
>
> I am indebted to a few mem
Hi All,
Today, I have double joy :)
I today did Switching (640-604) well, getting 987/1000 to complete my quest
for CCDP.
Then when I reached my apartment, there was a letter from Cisco (well, from
Prometric) that I had passed BGP Beta with 827/1000, passing score 755. BGP
was such a
rememeber the metric of RIP is hop count.
if u redistribue routes from other routing protocols to rip, u have to
config the default-metric with value smaller than 15. otherwises, the metric
will reach the max value and u cannot see the routes.
u can try "debug ip rip" to see more details
Message
hD dissertation.
A little history about how our BGP work got started. One fine day,
when I was working at Nortel as a router designer, somebody from
sales came running in asking "how many BGP peers can we have?" I
started to explain the honest answer of "it depends."
Thank you for your answer Howard. Unfortunately I don't have enough
experience to answer in such depth as you did but maybe one day I'll get
there. :-)
PS. Isn't it good to see that experts participate in this forum too?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71088&t=70
Sounds like you may want to disable synchronization to get your routes
advertized...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71079&t=71073
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.ht
A team of us have been drafting IETF documents for a generalized
approach to single-router BGP convergence. The terminology document
is about to go to the RFC editor after some final text formatting.
The methodology document has technically expired--the economy hit the
team, but we should be
At 08:35 PM 6/21/2003 +, - jvd wrote:
>Hi Zsombor,
>
>The last time I checked BGP was a routing protocol, that means there is an
>algorithm running that's calculating the best path to a destination. A bunch
>of information is advertised to you and your router needs to dec
Suppose I have a router which has a subnet x.x.x.0/24 defined
on some interface. Over one iBGP session I'd like to
advertise the x.x.x.0/24 subnet. Over another iBGP session,
I'd like to advertise x.x.x.0/25 and x.x.x.128/25. When
I config three network statements for these subn
Hi Zsombor,
The last time I checked BGP was a routing protocol, that means there is an
algorithm running that's calculating the best path to a destination. A bunch
of information is advertised to you and your router needs to decide which
routes to put in the routing table based on the inform
Paul,
Put "no synchronization" under your BGP router command and do your tests
again. Come back if you still have problems because maybe I'm not
understanding so well what you are trying to do.
Regards,
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
Thanks Zsombor,
I think the problem was bgp reditribute-internal did not work properly
for me. Then i used network command to include those routes i want to
redistribute, then it worked for me. So i jumped into an assumption that
only igp originated route is redistributed.
anyway, after
I was multi-homed. Sprint and Qwest.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: When to run BGP (was RE: number of CCIE [7:70151]
At 4:24 PM + 6/20/03, Mark E
At 11:32 AM 6/20/2003 +, paul dong so wrote:
>More information to this.
>
>r4 - eigrp - r10 - bgp-
>
>now i have tried replace eigrp with rip v2, the same problem. I want to
>redistribute bgp to egrip on r10. those routes learned via redistribute
>connected on bgp, ma
At 4:24 PM + 6/20/03, Mark E. Hayes wrote:
>NOT being a wise-a$$ here... When is it appropriate to run BGP? I set it
>up at the last job I had because I felt it was the best way to get
>redundancy for web services. I had two T-1's, ASN, and had to guarantee
>100% uptime for o
At 07:50 PM 6/20/2003 +, - jvd wrote:
>2. If you want to run full BGP tables you will need a router with more punch
>than the 1720. I did a proposal once with a 2650XM and the 2691 is also a
>good option. Next in line would be your 3640. Of course all of these models
>will need at
Hi,
Just a few thoughts:
1. You can use something small like a 1720 to run BGP but the trick here is
to filter all/some routes that you are receiving. The current recommendation
from Cisco is 128MB for full BGP routing tables (I think the tables stand on
110 000 routes now). The second part
More information to this.
r4 - eigrp - r10 - bgp-
now i have tried replace eigrp with rip v2, the same problem. I want to
redistribute bgp to egrip on r10. those routes learned via redistribute
connected on bgp, marked with origin code ? , can not be redistribute to
eigrp, only those routes
Hello,
I'm trying to wrap my head around a some offers from different IPSs. This
stuff (running BGP on internet routers) really is (currently) a bit over my
head, but I just can't bring me to accept the hardware requirements.
What we need to achieve basically is full redundancy on ou
Hi,
Can some one pls explain to me, when redistribute bgp to rip, if the
route originated as incomplete (as via redistribute only) will it be
redistribute to rip?
My test shows me the bgp route learned via redistribute won't be
advertised to rip, only when i include it in networks stat
hi guys,
r1r3---ISP1---
LAN 10.6.0.0| |Internet
r2r4---ISP2---
r1, r2, r3 and r4 are running BGP, there is only one path to the Internet
and vice versa. Suppose the path is from isp2, r4, r2 how do
If you are single homed there is no benefit running BGP but if your
dual homed, BGP can allow you to utilize the best path along with the
ability to dynamically announce your networks, influence incoming
traffic and all kinds of fun stuff.
Dave
Robert Perez wrote:
> Could anyone expl
Unless you have multiple egress points from your network to the Internet
(IOW Load Balancing) there is really not a compelling reason to recieve
full BGP routes, just have your ISP send you defaults via BGP, or even
simpler set your default to your ISP facing interface.
HTH
Robert Perez wrote
Could anyone explain the benefit of using BGP and holding the routing tables
on your router versus having the ISP hold the tables and you just receive a
default-route? Thanks.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70788&
.
A little clearer??
;->
>From: "Mwalie W"
>Reply-To: "Mwalie W"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: BGP Help! [7:70618]
>Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:05:42 GMT
>
>Hi,
>
>I have come across that Cisco statement before: I guess it means that on
route. HOpe this clarifies
Chirag Arora
>
-Original Message-
From: Tiongster 84 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP Help! [7:70618]
Hi guys,
What does this mean "BGP does not enable one AS to send traffic to a
nei
Hi,
I have come across that Cisco statement before: I guess it means that one AS
does not influence the routing policies of another AS :)
In other words (hoping I am right), AS1 implements its own internal routing
policy, as will AS2 and AS1 will not dictate to AS2 how AS2 should route
AS1's traf
Hi guys,
What does this mean "BGP does not enable one AS to send traffic to a
neighbor AS , intending that the traffic take a different route from that
taken by traffic originating in the neighbor AS."
Thank you very much!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read
This is interesting as I just read last night in Halabi that using Route
Reflectors and Confederations to get around the "fully meshed iBGP" rule is
only suggested when there are more than 100 iBGP peers!!! I was blown away
by that...
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/for
Thanks Jayhawls
and Selcuk, the link is usefull to understand more BGP..
cheers
hin
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> hi,
>
> this is nice cisco's page for BGP...
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm
>
> Selcuk
>
>
>
hi,
this is nice cisco's page for BGP...
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm
Selcuk
- Original Message -
From: "jayhawks-2003"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: BGP Policy-based Routing -- applicable for inbound and
Yes you can.
Route maps are your friend. You can specify a routemap on the end of the
"redistribute" command. As long as you block anything thats conflicting
(you could always NAT that) the stuff that doesnt conflict should be fine :)
TTFN
Lauren
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/f
n by three guys, one of them a PhD.
>
> I was surprised because I could write the same paper just from the
knowledge
> I gained on BGP through self-study. I understood the paper in its entirety
> without any struggle at all.
but then, you're a pretty smart guy, or so I'm to
I think you are confusing ip policy routing with BGP policy routing. These
are
two DIFFERENT concepts. A BGP routing policy determines what networks a BGP
speaking router can receive or advertise to / from a neighboring BGP
speaking
router ( IBGP or EBGP ). You use BGP neighbor statements to
Need to get your PHD first, right?? ;-> before you can start doing your
presentations!!
The papers that they write usually are very simple because they break it
down for you...so dummies like me can become real good at it!!
But how about actually developing BGP itself, maybe BGP ver
knowledge
I gained on BGP through self-study. I understood the paper in its entirety
without any struggle at all.
So, my main point is that we can get good knowledge through Cisco
Certifications, knowledge which can even help us attend conferences and
present very decent papers.
Good Luck.
Mwalie
hi guys,
Can BGP Policy-based routing be configured both on inbound and outbound
interfaces ?
I know that it is definitely for inbound interface.
And can the policy-based routing also be used to alter the final destination
of the packet ?
I don't think there's an option to set that.
Pl
Hi John,
I'm busy preparing for the CCIE written. I came across a very good example
that is related to your problem in Routing TCP/IP Vol. 2 (Doyle) p.369. What
it comes down to is that you have a merger between 2 companies that are both
using the 10.0.0.0 network on their private networks - sound
Hi All (long one)
Have my WAN running OSPF using a third party for the virtual Frame cloud
(telstra tpips), have just merged with a company that runs BGP over there
WAN and also use a third party for the virtual frame/IP cloud (not Telstra
Tpips). There is a single site that both companies share
Glad to help !!
Hope it was worth it towards your BGP learning process and towards your
CCIP!!
Based on the many Cisco exams that I have taken, BGP was the most
extensive and thorough exam (becoz' it is a beta) but it does really test
your knowledge on it, right?
And the second most diff
Hi,
I really appreciate your help.:). Ill let you know about how i fared
tomorrwow. Thanks a zillion!!!
Regards
Shahryar
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69777&t=69644
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Thanks Tom.. good explanation! This was my thought to the tee.. Yes I agree
with cisco that it does not hurt to add it to add value to the design.. But
as you just stated.. "ebgp-multihop is NOT necessary for load balancing"
That was my point all along.. Just wanted to clarify my point so I am not
etter balancing) then you'll need ebgp-multihop since you
are adding hops. If you have multiple directly connected interfaces to
the BGP neighbor and don't use loopback interfaces, you don't need
ebgp-multihop.
- Tom
Salvatore De Luca wrote:
> Understood.. but does the command "
Understood.. but does the command "neigh x.x.x.x ebgp-multihop X" by itself
provide load-balancing? I could be wrong.. but from my undrstanding this
just states that you have the capability of peering with neigh that are not
directly connected.. You could very well acheive loadbalancing when 2 EBG
BGP load balancing can be done using BGP peering on loopback address .And
you have to add static routes in
your routing table for loopback ip address and mention next-hop as serial
links ip addresses/serial interface
example:
nei loopbackip remote-as asnumber
nei loopbackip ebgp-multihop
Folllowing on from everyone else, we often make use of loopbacks for
internal peering, that way you will always have redundant paths to iBGP
peers, however when peering with external peers / isp we make use of the
external facing interface ip.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/r
No
- Original Message -
From: "Azhar Teza"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]
> If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
> balance by installing the command?
Hi,
I am also taking it on 30th. Can you please advice me a little bit further
on the format. Are there any simulation based questions??
Regards
ShahryarMwalie W wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Today, I did BGP Beta towards CCIP.
>
> A very thorough exam, with some bugs and gr
quot;Azhar Teza"
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:16 PM
>Subject: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]
>
>
> > If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
> > balance by installing the command? maximum-paths 2
> >
> > _
heres the cisco guide on it.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/icsbgp4.htm#2351
Bri
- Original Message -
From: "Salvatore De Luca"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]
> I personally prefer Peering with
Hi All,
Today, I did BGP Beta towards CCIP.
A very thorough exam, with some bugs and grammatical mistakes here and there.
It is so thorough and long that if you are not well prepared, you will pass
with difficulty. No time to thinkeven a faster reader like me had
problems.
The first
I personally prefer Peering with Loops myself.. the EBGP multihop command
has absolutley nothing to do with loadbalancing. It it used for peering with
neighbors whom are not directly connected.. There are various ways of
performing BGP load balancing.. Metric..route-maps.. etc.. Pick your flavor
The way I've seen 2 paths used is by peering with a loopback interface and
using
neighbor peerip ebgp-multihop in the config.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Azhar Teza"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:16 PM
Subject: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]
> If BGP r
If BGP route has two equal paths to the same destination, can it do load
balance by installing the command? maximum-paths 2
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Message Posted at:
http
1 - 100 of 2295 matches
Mail list logo
