I'm notoriously flaky with dial-up, but still interested.
I haven't got your earlier e-mails. Have we got both configs. Presumably,
for some reason, RouterB doesn't recognise that it is already connected to
RouterA so it dials a second channel for the return traffic. Are the
dialer-map statements
Hi John,
This a cut from my running-config, I have ppp encapsulation specified, why
are the calls HDLC framed?
interface Ethernet0
ip address 192.168.10.21 255.255.255.0
!
interface BRI0
ip address 192.168.11.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation ppp
dialer map ip 192.168.11.2 name RouterB
Show PPP mulitlink says there are no active bundles.
I tried debug isdn q931 and this is what I got:
RouterA#debug isdn q931
ISDN Q931 packets debugging is on
RouterA#
8w3d: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 70 changed to up
8w3d: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to
Dear all, on a Cisco 801 router I am entering
#terminal monitor
#debug ppp negotiation
#logging monitor debug
#logging on
RouterA#show log
Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 messages rate-limit
0 overruns)
Console logging: level debugging, 64712 messages logged
Monitor
Actually, while I'm after some advice :-) another thing that confues me
about these ISDN 801 routers is that I have 2 x B channels up but I don't
have PPP multilink configured.
RouterA#show isdn status
Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-net3
ISDN BRI0 interface
dsl 0, interface ISDN
Actually, while I'm after some advice :-) another thing that confues me
about these ISDN 801 routers is that I have 2 x B channels up but I don't
have PPP multilink configured.
As I recall, HDLC encapsulation automatically uses both B channels.
John
RouterA#show isdn status
Global ISDN
The channels are not necessarily multilinked, try a sh ppp
multilink to see if they are bundled.
dave
James Gosnold wrote:
Actually, while I'm after some advice :-) another thing that confues me
about these ISDN 801 routers is that I have 2 x B channels up but I don't
have PPP multilink
Yes you should see more. Are you sure you have ppp authenication
enabled? For grins try debug isdn q931 and see if you get anything.
Dave
James Gosnold wrote:
Dear all, on a Cisco 801 router I am entering
#terminal monitor
#debug ppp negotiation
#logging monitor debug
#logging on
]
Onderwerp: RE: Confusion on CISSP requirements [7:60997]
Not necessarily Scott. You've got to be able to prove (in others words have
documentable proof), that you've worked for a cumulative total of 4 years in
the security field. Now, the caveat is that your work can be spread amongst
the ten
I'm studying for the CISSP test right now and have wondered the same thing.
I've talked to two people that have taken and passed the test (and been
confirmed by ISC2) and their jobs never were entirely security based but
always had some degree of security responsibility, as you're saying.
So I
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Scott
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Confusion on CISSP requirements [7:60997]
I'm a CCIE with over 4 years of experience in networking and a college
degree. Each position I have had required a small percentage
I'm a CCIE with over 4 years of experience in networking and a college
degree. Each position I have had required a small percentage of security
related work. Does that satisfy the requirements or are they asking for
100% security work? Any help greatly appreciated.
Message Posted at:
I have a PIX 501 and get a single IP from my ISP. I would like to set up an
FTP conduit, but on port 5051. I can't find any docs on how to do this. When
I play around it it states that I have to change my NAT rules too. I still
want all inside users access outside. Any info or links are
From Cisco's website:
You can use the fixup command to change the default port assignments or to
enable or disable application inspection for the following protocols and
applications:
a.. FTP
b.. H.323
c.. HTTP
d.. ILS
e.. RSH
f.. RTSP
g.. SIP
h.. SKINNY (SCCP)
Try this:
static (inside,outside) tcp interface ftp 192.168.1.2(or IP of your internal
host) 5051 netmask 255.255.255.
255 0 0
-Original Message-
From: NetEng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Confusion [7:54875]
I
Still confused, I'm using access-lists
Here's the example from cisco:
static (inside, outside) 175.1.1.254 192.168.1.2
access-list 101 permit tcp host any host 192.168.1.2 eq ftp
access-group 101 in interface outside
Here's my questions:
I'm using DHCP for my outside address, can I still PAT
Here's my config
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo-reply
access-list 101 permit icmp any any source-quench
access-list 101 permit icmp any any unreachable
access-list 101 permit icmp any any time-exceeded
access-list 101 permit tcp any host 192.168.1.2 eq ftp
access-list 101 permit tcp
Dear Joel -
I read in the Switching Services Configuration Guide, page XC-15, that
Fast switching is not supported on serial interfaces using encapsulations
other than HDLC. This contradicts earlier examples, particularly where fast
switching is enabled on the hub side of a frame relay
With the callin option, only the one who is calling needs to authenticate
himsel.
Without it, you have to configure chap usernames and password at both ends.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48392t=48325
--
FAQ, list
My brain must have been fried last night. I just noticed that I answered the
question about callback, not callin authentication. Sorry if this caused any
confusion. I'm giving up answering questions at 2:30 in the morning.
The actuall answer to the callin question is as follows:
Callin
When you are using the callin option, only the one who calls needs to
authenticate himsefl.
You know, when you do not conigure this option, you have to configure chap
username and password for both ends.
Regards.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48391t=48325
When using PPP callin, it occurs on the receiving device. Conceptually think
of it this way, the calling device places a call, the receiving device
receives the call, the calling device calls the initiating device back. Hope
this helps.
Carl Timm, CCIE# 7149
Message Posted at:
-
From: Carl Timm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: confusion on ppp auth chap callin/ppp auth pap [7:48325]
When using PPP callin, it occurs on the receiving device. Conceptually think
of it this way, the calling device places a call
one cisco doc says that the callin keyword is used on incoming or
received calls (which to me implies the CALLED router), while on another
it lists a config where it is configured on the CALLING router
actually, whatever side it's configured on, it works in my lab! still, i'm
trying to get a
I think the main thing to note about cT1s is bit robbed signalling i.e
channel asscociated signalling normally used to transport voice. Therefore,
we've got 7 bits of payload, 1 bit for signalling for every timeslot and 1
bit for framing. Bit robbed signalling would effectively yield a 56 kbps
I think even a pure data T1 is channelized. Even the PRI is as well.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Wesley wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think the main thing to note about cT1s is bit robbed signalling i.e
channel asscociated signalling normally used to
Hi John
Thought I would just add a few words from 'T1 A survival guide' from
O'Reilly.
T1 = DS1 delivered over a 4 wire copper interface
DS1 = Digital Stream level 1 - 24 DS0's combined into a DS1 which supplies
1536 kbps connectivity plus 8 kbps framing and signalling overhead for a
total of
I am assuming that this is refering to a
Point-to-Point T1 Circuit. If so, the telco refers
to
the circuit as unchanelized because they are not
breaking off any channels for you, You are doing
this
yourself with a mux.
Thanks,
Benjamin Pierce
--- Steven A. Ridder wrote:
I think a
Hey Matt,
That's exactly where I got my info from. BTW, that's a really good book to
learn about T1, unchannelized or otherwise. And it goes into HDLC, PPP and
Frame Relay as well. The reindeer on the front cover rocks! hehe
Wes
Matthew Crane wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Just when I thought I understood the T1 world pretty well we've run into
a situation that is thoroughly confusing me.
I was under the impression that channelized T1 services used 24
timeslots. I call that 'channelized' because it has 24 distinct
'channels'. It's my understanding that
John,
There's nothing wrong with your understanding of channelized vs.
unchannelized. I believe your provider's tech dosen't understand or is
completely mis-informed.
Nigel
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
To:
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:10 PM
Subject: Confusion
I think a channelized T1 sends 193 bit frames as well. 8 for each channel
plus 1 for timing = 193.
All T1's are channelized, otherwise it would have to be some sort of
byte-synch communication, which isn't plausible.
I think the tech you spoke to is incorrect as well.
John Neiberger wrote
With DLSW over frame relay, you can use direct encapsulation (frame map
dlsw, with pass thru), or DLSW Lite (frame map llc, no pass thru). On the
lab I'm sure they would make it clear which one they wanted and if not...
ask the proctor. Here's a link which explains it pretty well.
JR
GUys,
A bit confuse abt DLSW+ direct encapsulation. I read on CD that
it can be configure via 2 ways
(1) DLSW LITe
(2) PASSTHRU
but I can see that in books dlsw lite is treated as another encapsulation
type and not the direct encapsulation..
SO If we follow the CD and lets consider that we
5:24 PM
Subject: DLSW direct encapsulation confusion--for Experts only [7:41164]
GUys,
A bit confuse abt DLSW+ direct encapsulation. I read on CD that
it can be configure via 2 ways
(1) DLSW LITe
(2) PASSTHRU
but I can see that in books dlsw lite is treated as another
encapsulation
Trying to apply what I am learning in the CCNA class, I am running into some
confusion regarding some basic concepts. I am trying to apply what I
learned to our network which has a few colocated customers to whom I want to
assign ips with subnets.
We have a /23 assigned to us, let us call
OK, some terminology. We've got physical networks. They are bound by
routers. Anytime a packet goes through a router, it is moving from one
physical network to another. Then you have a logical subnet. This is what
actually gets addressed. It is possible to have multiple logical subnets on
25, 2002 1:25 PM
Subject: RE: Gateway/Network Address confusion [7:36400]
OK, some terminology. We've got physical networks. They are bound by
routers. Anytime a packet goes through a router, it is moving from one
physical network to another. Then you have a logical subnet. This is what
Could someone please tell me the correct way to permit just SNA. I have
read many places that the correct access list to permit just SNA is :
access-list 200 permit 0x 0x0D0D
I just received the Cisco Practical Studies book and it shows it as follows:
access-list 200 permit 0x0D0D 0x
You are correct. That book, while good, is littered with typos
and this is definitely one of them. If your mask were 0x,
then it would only match 0x0d0d exactly. Check out the
following webpage for a great explanation:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/698/acl200.html
HTH,
John
I am trying to setup NAT translation. here is the setup. I want to NAT any
local address, to the IP address of my external ethernet interface
(many-to-one). 10.0.0.0 is the internal network. 192.168.1.1 is the IP
address of the external ethernet port.
I am on the cisco page and I am
ip nat inside source list 1 pool NatPool wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am trying to setup NAT translation. here is the setup. I want to NAT
any
local address, to the IP address of my external ethernet interface
(many-to-one). 10.0.0.0 is the internal
ip nat pool Name 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.1 mask 255.255.255.0
! creates a pool that defines what the addresses will be translated into
ip nat inside source list 1 pool Name overload
! tells the router that addresses defined in acl1 will use the pool Name to
translate into when leaving the router.
Ignore this post. I figured it out. For anyone who is interested:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/12.html#2
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nat confusion [7:26484
as there is no static mapping of addresses with this config.
-Original Message-
From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nat confusion [7:26484]
I am trying to setup NAT translation. here is the setup. I
want to NAT
Hi guys,
Just a little confusion regarding CQ.
As far as I know when we are going to implement custome queueing for
different protocols,we are suppose to consider frame size for every protocol
and than find the accurate bandwidth each queu should have??
On the other hand, I saw in many test
Hi guys,
I am still revolving around an stupid DLSW confusion.
I found in many 3rd party labs and other configurations that they are
using SOURCE-ROUTE BRIDGE x command even when configuring DLSW+ between 2
ethernet segments..
Do we really need to put this command even when we
no, this is not needed when only dealing with ethernets. Although arguing
that it doesn't do any harm
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Lover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 September 2001 13:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DLSW Confusion [7:18304]
Hi guys,
I am still revolving
I have this set up in my lab right now, and I left the source-route commands
off on all the Ethernet routers and it worked fine.
Lance
Cisco Lover wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi guys,
I am still revolving around an stupid DLSW confusion.
I found
you need DLSW in the first place ?
my 0.01
Donny
CCDA CCNP
From: Cisco Lover
Reply-To: Cisco Lover
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DLSW Confusion [7:18304]
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:41:49 -0400
Hi guys,
I am still revolving around an stupid DLSW confusion.
I found in many 3rd party labs
Okay, I'm thoroughly confused. I'm doing some research on this platform
because we'll be purchasing one later this year or early next year. The
documentation seems to be quite murky and the more I read, the less
clear the picture is.
I see a few different issues that I need help with. The
the less
clear the picture is.
The entire Catalyst architecture is strange and piecemeal. I understand
your
confusion and frustration.
I see a few different issues that I need help with. The first is
software. Which one to use? CatOS? Supervisor IOS? If I can only do
CEF with IOS, then i
Confusion [7:9983]
John Neiberger wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Okay, I'm thoroughly confused. I'm doing some research on this platform
because we'll be purchasing one later this year or early next year. The
documentation seems to be qui
Catalyst architecture is strange and piecemeal. I
understand
your
confusion and frustration.
I see a few different issues that I need help with. The first is
software. Which one to use? CatOS? Supervisor IOS? If I can only
do
CEF with IOS, then if we get CatOS are we totally hosed and
it
just
looked funny to me...I'm easily amused ;) I guess it's just the way
every
other word came out an acronym...heh.
- Original Message -
From: dre
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Catalyst 6500 Confusion [7:9983]
John Neiberger wrote in message
[EMAIL
John Neiberger wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In the first configuration, the Sup1A can use CatOS or SupIOS. The
MSFC operates as the MLS-RP and the Sup1A is the MLS-SE, right?
InterVLAN traffic is routed initially by the MSFC until a flow is
established, at
I would say that the overall architecture of the Catalyst 5x00/6x00
series is definitely overcomplicated.
I personally think that because it's so overcomplicated, it has to
have less performance and reliability, etc than other products that
do Layer 3 switching. This is not verified completely,
instructions on converting your old conduits to access-list statements.
Hope that helps
Allen
- Original Message -
From: Greg
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: Pix command confusion [7:9275]
I have a pix 520 running version 5.2. I have to let a vendor come in to do
some
can anyone direct me on the best way to edit conduit and static list when
they get up to 150-200 entries
-Original Message-
From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pix command confusion [7:9275]
Even
Cut and paste to and from a text editor. Keep the text files for reference.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
NP-BASS LEON
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 7:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Pix command confusion
I have a pix 520 running version 5.2. I have to let a vendor come in to do
some work on a Unix box. I'm a little confused as to what commands I need to
execute to do this (Nat, static, and/or conduit). For example how do I get
pix to show 197.168.xx.xx to 210.110.xx.xx? Any info would be
static (inside,outside) 210.110.xx.xx 192.168.xx.xx netmask 255.255.255.255
conduit permit tcp host 210.110.xx.xx eq [port] host 210.xxx.xx.xx
The conduit permit command restricts access to the port specified. It also
restricts access by foreign IP
If you want to open it the port to any IP (I
I'm chewing on my BSCN studies, any help appreciated.
BSCN book (Paquet/Teare, p. 254, last paragraph), The topology table
contains all destinations advertised by the neighboring routers. The show ip
eigrp topology all-links command displays all the IP entries in the topology
table. The show
Hello Group,
I'm getting a little confused about configuring Async, Dialers and Lines.
I've been reading the BCRAN book and looking at the sample config
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/service/configs/async/async_ip_st
atic_aux.htm
I'm not sure how to configure 'Line' for modems.
My telco has installed a 64K line. I thought I could use a T1 WIC, and set
the bandwidth to 64 and/or use the command service-module timeslot 1 to run
this point-to-point leased line. Is this only possible if the line is
fractional T1?(the question probably should be "what is the line, 64K or
A 56/64k 4 wire will only work with the same interface. Its not T1 timing
signal compatable.
A Fract/T1 is usually provisioned at 128K and above but is configurable at
64K with one timeslot.
Its much more expensive/month so unless you know the potential for needed
bandwith increases are a given,
bject: WIC Confusion
My telco has installed a 64K line. I thought I could use a T1 WIC, and
set
the bandwidth to 64 and/or use the command service-module timeslot 1 to
run
this point-to-point leased line. Is this only possible if the line is
fractional T1?(the question probably should be "w
You have to enter ur sylven number to login.
Logo they will mail you if u give ur details in that site
Congratulations on ur success and new year wishes
Rameshbabu
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Kamran Sheikh wrote:
Dear Sir /Madam,
I have some confusion on registration on cisco
tracking system
Dear Sir /Madam,
I have some confusion on registration on cisco
tracking system. Kindly tell me i have my cisco ID i
have cleared the CCNA 2.0 exam in previous month.
I have tried on tracking system but it cannot be
login. please help me.
And another thing where CCNA 2.0 logo resides
: Saturday, December 02, 2000 1:14 AM
Subject: QoS Confusion!
[Warning: I should have broken this up into several separate questions,
but
it's late and I'm feeling lazy.]
We are currently implementing video over IP over frame relay. Our video
conferencing units have the capability to set the IP
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 12:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QoS Confusion!
[Warning: I should have broken this up into several separate questions, but
it's late and I'm feeling lazy.]
We are
[Warning: I should have broken this up into several separate questions, but
it's late and I'm feeling lazy.]
We are currently implementing video over IP over frame relay. Our video
conferencing units have the capability to set the IP precedence of their
traffic. I initially thought that we'd
Title: TCN BPDU confusion
I'm reading the Cisco LAN switching book (great book)! I've got a question about topology change notification BPDU's. If you have a port on a switch that is NOT using portfast with say a workstation or server connected. When that port comes up spanning tree will run
In my experience you would always want to turn portfast on in end point
segments especially those simply connected to workstations and servers
since they shouldn't be participating in creating ne type of bridging loop
issues
"Rampley, Jim" wrote:
I'm reading the Cisco LAN switching
book (great
Ok,
When both the links are active , How will the internal router comes to know
that which link to use ? To be specific, If a make a router ( Internal router )
to be present in area 1 and area 2, I want This Internal router to take the
link through the area1 and not area 2. In case the link
Hello group,
Can anyone out there shed a light on the right format to configure a
bandwidth on a serial interface.
ie, to configure say 19200 on an interface, do you input
#bandwidth 19200
OR
#bandwidth 19
As the IOS do not support decimal, and when you do a show
hey :)
its um bandwidth 19200 for 19.2mb
if u wanted it 64k then u'd do 'bandwidth 64'
Justin... :)
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Wale Jones wrote:
Hello group,
Can anyone out there shed a light on the right format to configure a
bandwidth on a serial interface.
ie, to configure say 19200 on
CDP does not "find fellow devices", it is more like a beacon, periodically
anouncing itself to anyone who would listen. If you would like to listen,
type in:
show cdp neighbors
If CDP is enabled on other Cisco network devices, you will see something
like:
Capability Codes: R - Router, T -
on Proxy Arp and CDP.
Original Message Follows
From: "Scoles, Damian" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Scoles, Damian" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CDP Confusion
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 19:20:03 -0500
I am trying to figure ou
"Scoles, Damian" wrote:
routers). What I am confused about is that I read somewhere that it can
pick up the layer 3 (or was it layer 2?) address on interface cards on the
devices it discovers.
CDP includes information on layer 3 addresses etc. but doesnt use them
to transmit the CDP
ABR with an interface in area 2 and in area 0, then area
0 will not learn about the route in area 1. You can implement virtual links
to work around this.
I violated OSPF's most fundamental principle with my quick answer: all
areas must touch area 0.
Sorry for any confusion, and thanks Ed
Greetings,
Guys
I am little bit confused with OSPF Configuration. Please help me
out.
1.Just imagine that i need 3 area's to be configured including area
0.
2. Assume that i have 2 routers in area 0
and Area 1 and Area 2 are having 2 routers each.
3. Just
If I read your message correctly, you have:
Internal Routers(2) Area 1 ABRArea0 ABR Area 2 Internal Routers(2)
A router in area 1 now has a link to area 2 (in other words, it has an
interface in area 1 and 2).
What you want will happen automatically. Remember that OSPF enabled
I am trying to figure out exactly what CDP does. IF I understand it
correctly it simply finds fellow cisco devices on the network (switches,
routers). What I am confused about is that I read somewhere that it can
pick up the layer 3 (or was it layer 2?) address on interface cards on the
devices
CDP is a data-link layer protocol and includes
information such as interface address's, IOS version,
etc. If you use On demand routing then the router
configured for ODR will place routes in the routing
table from CDP packets. ODR is configured on one
router only - not both ends.
--- "Scoles,
Kent ,
In the case of just ip then multiring ip will do .
Multiring will force the router to send out arp as an
SRE ( default ) . In this case you gather a path (RIF)
to the end device . It will show up in 'sh rif'
Procedure in TR is to first send the arp local to the
ring . If you don't have
Hi All,
Never worked with Token Ring in the real life, do not
understand why we need to have 'multiring all' there
to route ip, does it just enalbe the all route
explorer of ip traffic? If it does, can I say if I
have two cisco routers hooked up on a hub(or MAU), and
give them ip address in the
Please could someone clarify the difference between IOS "T" and non-"T" releases ?
Thanks in advance,
/gabriel
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report
"T" releases refer to "Technology" releases. In other words, new technology
feature or functionality will first appear in a "T" release, and then be
incorporated in to a standard release train in a later version/release. That
is why you will not see a "T" release go into General Deployment (GD).
That is correct , in 11.2 it was called 'P' .
Avoid using T or P releases if you do not need the new
features .
flem
--- Kevin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"T" releases refer to "Technology" releases. In
other words, new technology
feature or functionality will first appear in a "T"
You will need to remove your PCMCIA network adapter rom your
notebook when you leave the office.
Both Win95 and Win98 are broken in that they will still try to send
traffic to a down connected network. (ie. it still thinks it can hit your
office network with the PCMCIA network card.)
Sean
sorry normaly I ask only router stuff here but I'm desperate
have MS messed up TCP or did I miss something
does anybody know how I can get traffic destined for my LAN to go over my
WAN gateway when I am out o the office, notebook win98 (shame on me)
all traffic destined for what is normaly my
Can anyone tell me why Cisco made the bit syntax
different between access lists and the "ip route"
command???
Example:
permit ip any host 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
In this case, the zeros in the second column match
exactly and the 255 is a wildcard.
BUT then:
ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
Anyone of u can tell me that i read on the official web site of cisco
regarding CCNP cert, than it can also be achieved by a mixture of CCNP 1.0 and
2.0 tracks, that is if one got ACRC and CLSC of 1.0 track and Remote Access
and Support 2.0 of CCNP 2.0 then u will be certifie as CCNP 1.0, so plz
confusion over which of the follwoing are required for a
router to route?
possible routes
best route
encrypt key
destination address
Verify route is current
Some sample tests list destination address and best route as the only
choice, but I believe the Chappel book lists everything but encrypt
I'm a little confused about ppp callback, given several key sources of
information. Fatkid.com includes a username and callback dial-string global
command, however, Cisco docs do not. As well, I have configured dial
callback without this global command and it seemed to work fine. Any ideas?
96 matches
Mail list logo
