On Wednesday 19 November 2003 07:50 am, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
I have Pixelview PlayTV Pak TV tuner card which comes with camera connected
to tuner card. I have to use windows for netmeeting or yahoo video
conferencing because of this camera. has anybody used this camera in linux
for
gnomemeeting.
On Monday 10 November 2003 10:37 pm, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Anne Wilson escribió:
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 5:23 am, Michael Noble wrote:
It has been a while since I last dd a disk drive (it is best to
make them the same type and size). Assuming that the old disk is
/dev/hda and the new disk is
On Saturday 08 November 2003 05:41 pm, dfox wrote:
Apparently I cannot send mail with my postfix on localhost to the network.
Previously this was working fine and I don't see any changes made to my
postfix configuration files.
But in the last few days things have not gone well here. Firstly,
On Thursday 06 November 2003 11:47 pm, Dean S. Messing wrote:
snip
et [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I removed all the cd sources, and setup main, contrib, updates and plf
: as sources via ezurpmi at plf.
That's what I'm in the process of trying to do now.
I'm struggling with urpmi
do you run squid?
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 06:23 am, David E. Fox wrote:
hey - help!
it's seemingly apparent that in the last week or two there seems to
be an increasing number of mails of a dubious nature being sent to
a large number of bogus addresses by yours truly :(.
I'm not a
On Thursday 06 November 2003 02:47 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Dean S. Messing schrieb am Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:58:40 -0800 (PST):
When downloading the Powerpack Ed. from the Club do I need to
also d/l the 3 distribution CDs (making six CDs total)?
I ask because I only downloaded the 3
On Saturday 05 April 2003 09:09 am, Bill Beauchemin wrote:
After loading MDK9.1 on a Compaq Proliant 3000 server the server now
shows that one processor has failed during bootup. The raid controller
also comes up with an out of order failure. I went in using the Compaq
configuration disks and
On Saturday 05 April 2003 09:35 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 05 Apr 2003 3:27 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
On Saturday 05 April 2003 11:06, Anne Wilson wrote:
I want to set up GnomeMeeting, but have a problem with the video
source. I have the choice of /dev/video0 and /dev/video1,
On Thursday 03 April 2003 06:52 pm, Damon Lynch wrote:
No I did not try the blackdown java. My experience with blackdown java
from that time period was not good -- probably I had too many crashes
from the boxed IBM version, which required it (the Mandrake 7.2 version
required IBM's own java,
On Monday 31 March 2003 04:17 pm, Baka Tamás wrote:
Dear Experts :-)
I have trouble with MDK 9.1. I tried both included Apachees, but neither
process php files even though everything needed is installed. I state this
as by installing phpNuke, all dependencies were met. Strange thing is that
I have upgraded to 9.1 from 9.0, the family boxes, with no hitch (celerys,
333, 500, 1200) and see no problems yet but those boxes are built to be linux
friendly anyway. my real concern is _my_ SMP box (dual 1gig P111
coppermine) as the only posts I have seen mention problems with apic, which
On Thursday 27 March 2003 04:22 am, Azrael wrote:
I have a slight annoyance with my tv card. Now I don't just expect it to
work with Mandrake, so I'm not complaining really ;)
However during the install procedure for 9.0 all the 9.1 betas, and now
9.1 final my tv card is recognised as being a
On Thursday 20 March 2003 03:38 pm, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 11:20, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
...
After finally getting 9.0 installed (5 hours later), I noted that there
is much less scsi drivers built for the BOOT kernel then other kernels.
Why is
On Sunday 16 March 2003 06:03 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 15 Mar 2003 7:20 pm, civileme wrote:
I was looking at the Mandrakesoft site recently and I saw a
recommendation for folks to use MandrakeExpert rather than these mailing
lists.
I hate the web interface and It required a
On Sunday 16 March 2003 11:23 am, Arvid Poon wrote:
Dear all,
I tried to upgrade my glibc from Mandrake 7 by running 'rpm -Uvh
glibc-' and got the following message :
rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 is need by glibc-x
How can I find that rpm ? I can't find it in
On Saturday 15 March 2003 08:24 am, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:44:57 -0800
Bryan Whitehead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I ment 9.0
The 8500 Is Not supported in 9.0 unless you use the linux driver from
ATI.
Charles
or framebuffer???
--
Linux counter number 167806
On Friday 14 March 2003 03:49 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 18:56, Gary Hodder wrote:
It is the latest as of a couple of days.
It boots up ok and is quick in text mode.
When running kde it starts loading ok, brings up the kde box and goes
through those items and then
On Friday 14 March 2003 05:41 pm, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Will Mandrake 9.0 work out of the box with this card?
or do I need todo some extra hacking?
I only need 2D. No hardware 3D needed.
--
Linux counter number 167806
yes it works out of the box on the ATI 8500DVI installed in a box here.
On Thursday 13 March 2003 02:00 pm, Ric Tibbetts wrote:
I'm making a statement of personal/political basis.
I'm personally boycotting Mandrake Linux. When the French remember who
their firends are, and support them, then perhaps this American will
return, and support the French again.
Until
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 09:19 pm, Gary Hodder wrote:
Hi all,
my son's just loaded mdk 9.1 on his machine and finds kde runs very slow,
much slower than 9.0. The machine is a celeron 400 with 96mb ram.
I wont find out more till I get home. Are there any ideas that he could try
in the mean
On Thursday 13 March 2003 05:54 pm, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote:
This might be the DHCP problem that was talked about today at some length.
Is it 9.1 RC2? If so, you'll want to wait for 9.1 final or update the DHCP
packages from cooker. I'm not sure which ones, but a reading of the
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 02:28 pm, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
Hi List!
I bought a mobo K7VM2 from ASRock and I must say that I'm satisfied.
Although I still have two minor problems that I'll discuss in another
opportunity.
This mobo offers 6 usb slots. Four is present. Since some
I wrong or missing something?
Saludos
I don't think it was the ) that bottered him, I thought it was the x
ET
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
And even more important to _me_, where did you find a hosting/co-location
service using Mandrake?
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 12:49 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 13:58, Miark wrote:
It's me, O, Lord :-)
I Googled the situation and found the answer: ident lookups. I have
On Monday 10 March 2003 12:23 am, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:05 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
Unless you're sure your case and cpu cooling is adequate, take the
diag's in the above order. Otherwise go right to cpuburn. The acid
test for cpu/cache/ram/PSU/motherboards.
On Monday 10 March 2003 06:33 am, et wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 12:23 am, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 09:05 pm, David E. Fox wrote:
Unless you're sure your case and cpu cooling is adequate, take the
diag's in the above order. Otherwise go right to cpuburn
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:17 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
Hi list,
I noticed this yesterday after receiving an error message from Mozilla that
it couldn't send a message. So far I've been all over the filesystem every
way I know how, but still can't find a reason for this condition.
So far I've
On Monday 10 March 2003 08:02 am, Brian wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:54 am, civileme wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2003 03:17 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
Hi list,
I noticed this yesterday after receiving an error message from Mozilla
that it couldn't send a message. So far I've been all
On Sunday 09 March 2003 02:33 pm, Miark wrote:
A friend of mine saw somebody speaking about Winblows 2003 and the
presenter said specifically that it was going to be the new server OS,
putting Linux in the dust.
I told him that regardless of technology, the expense and licensing
associated
On Friday 07 March 2003 09:33 pm, Gary Hodder wrote:
Hi Mark,
with the 3 drives in and it boots normally, edit the fstab file and
change the hdc? to hdb?
? being the partition number.
Change lilo to be hdb instead of hdc.
Reboot with a floppy, at lilo promp: linux root=/dev/hdb?
? being
On Saturday 08 March 2003 06:48 am, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
OK. I fiddled some more with it (a few hours). None of the parameters you
gave me worked. Same problem. With the enterprise kernel there is a small
difference which I noticed just now (or at least in the 12mdk enterprise
kernel from
Message -
From: et [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] new memory 512MB module (total 1024MB) and linux
won't boot and also installer doesn't work anymore
On Saturday 08 March 2003 06:48 am, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
OK. I
On Saturday 08 March 2003 01:57 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2003 07:16 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
They are both mounted as ide-scsi so that they could be seen my
x-cd-roast., I have given up with that utility, as it could not see
my IDE HD.
I use Gcombust here - works
On Friday 07 March 2003 08:30 am, Adrian Golumbovici wrote:
I know, that is why I am wondering why it freezes including the install CD.
Even if I would have to have a enterprise kernel (as I read in some other
answers), the installer should provide at least an alternative kernel for
such
On Thursday 06 March 2003 02:42 pm, Brian wrote:
I just had some strange behavior on my system.
I noticed that net_monitor was not working. I went into /usr/sbin and sure
enough net_monitor was now a link to a file called /usr/bin/consolehelper
and there was a working version of net_monitor
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 06:52 am, Mark wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 22:10, Ken Walker wrote:
You may think this a stupid question, but your not using a 8x re-writable
disk are you ?
If you put in a x2 re-writable, it'll only write at x2, if it's a x8,
it'll only write at x8,
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 09:29 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
I have tried without success to install onto a very old box, IBM/Cyrix cpu.
It really isn't worth fighting too much, but I'd like to have one more go
at it.
All I have got, so far, is as far as the initial screen, F1, and first try,
typed
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 05:01 pm, Adolfo Bello wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 15:36, Albert E. Whale, CISSP wrote:
Does anyone have any idea why this command will hang?
find /dev -type f
I would like to find/correct this issue.
TIA.
Not in my box. It works Ok.
works good here too,
On Monday 03 March 2003 09:54 am, Pierre Fortin wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:44:56 +0100 Jan Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Is anyone else, besides me, receiving all the messages twice?
Nope... maybe your choice of mailer
On Saturday 01 March 2003 08:18 pm, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
John Haywood wrote:
I'm getting a little confused here, as far as I can see I have a couple
of possibilities for getting an accellerated driver for XFree on MDK 9,
and I'm wondering whether there is a point to pursuing one of these,
On Saturday 01 March 2003 11:43 pm, Mark wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am having problems with what looks like scsi emu probs, I am using
mandrake 9 and a Duron 1.3g .. the problem is I have a LG 48x16x48 cdr
drive no matter what i try I can not burn quicker than 8x with out
having problem like
On Saturday 01 March 2003 03:41 am, Dale Huckeby wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 28 February 2003 12:48 pm, Ron Stodden wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN
html
head
html crap deleted . . .
as Clic.
On Thursday 27 February 2003 10:21 pm, synrat wrote:
lol. no you need sun fire 1 for this :)
90 cpus and 10 terabytes of ram
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jim C wrote:
I'm not entirely sure but this might be the sort or thing a MOSIX
cluster would be good for.
Jim C.
et wrote
On Friday 28 February 2003 02:17 am, Ron Stodden wrote:
civileme wrote:
E, pardon my intrusion but I think you might want to check your mailer
settings. I am sure you didn't want to send html to the list
You are sure? How?
E, use of html is deliberate because it supports useful
On Friday 28 February 2003 09:10 am, logic7 wrote:
You need none of that. Back in the day, we were recording 24 tracks with a
P233mmx (w/scsi drives) or PPC 604e 200 (PowerMac 8600/200).
It's like I said, it's all a matter of what you're recording. If you really
want to spend $1, then get
On Friday 28 February 2003 11:27 am, Philip Webb wrote:
could we all please try to remember to change the Subject
whenever the subject of our messages actually changes?
an accurate Subject helps with triage on any busy list
may in fact cause me to read something i would otherwise have passed
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 09:29 pm, mike wrote:
Adolpho should not have done this, but there is right winged shit on this
list all the time.
Don't get me started!
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 08:02 pm, Seth Zirin wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 06:08, et wrote:
Very bad form to send
On Thursday 27 February 2003 03:02 am, Michael Adams wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:52, Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 16:55, Ric Tibbetts wrote:
...
Actually, I have XP running at home on a PII-333
My kids use it as their game machine.
But my
.) but linux
really uses smp and more mem much better than WIn2k.
thanks,
see I learnt something again today... life is good.
et
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 09:55 pm, Damian Gatabria wrote:
ehhh, no mater what, or so I have heard, win 9x to win me will NOT boot
with more than 512 megs ram. I can
just got a very nice deal to build a box (in the next couple of months,
quality is much more important than fast delivery) to run a sound recording
studio. I would love to hear suggestions. Budget is to be less than
$10,000.00 USD delivered, not including (professional) software. or sound
. If not, then get dual athlon mp.
Get at least 2gb of ram, the faster the better. I always use athlons,
because they work 3 times faster with floating point, but you may not need
that.
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, et wrote:
just got a very nice deal to build a box (in the next couple of months
about it. Of course I do
have any windows installation I run highly tweaked and tuned to
perfection( as good as is possible), and perhaps I can tweak my Linux
installs a little more than I presently have.
Robert Crawford
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 07:26 pm, et wrote
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 07:34 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
snip
Yes, in the US, RedHat is the brand that's known and that's what we're
trying to address.
Blue skies... Todd
Ok, let us know what we can do to help.
ET
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go
I was not speaking about anyone in particular
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 04:13 pm, flacycads wrote:
If you are referring to me, my /etc/hosts file is correct (not empty), and
my hard drives are tweaked with hdparm, and have been since I started Linux
about 9 months ago. I also only run the
Very bad form to send this type (of SPAM) to a tech mail list, From: Adolfo
ortiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] has just made it to my spam filters
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 04:46 am, antonio rodriguez wrote:
Dear All,
I have Mandrake Linux 8.1 installed on a Duron sharing the hard disk
with WinMe. After defrag WinMe I found that I couldn't boot Linux
because of a kernel panic. Entering in rescue mode I've ran fdisk so my
new
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 07:17 am, flacycads wrote:
This is a good example of the wisdom of having a separate /home partition.
Rescues, and if need be, reinstalls are then essentially painless. I've
forgotten exacly how 8.1 cd1 installs, but did you try booting from a linux
floppy boot
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 03:25 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 12:12, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 25 Feb 2003 7:43 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
The bottom line is that if you use the LM distros and you have the
extra jack, which amounts to the cost of a magazine subscription,
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 04:23 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 13:21, J. Grant wrote:
hi
Jack Coates wrote:
A UK-specific distro is kinda scary, I'm imagining all this Austin
Powers theming going on :-) And of course it would have to use the
Slackware .tgz packaging
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 05:01 pm, Joe Braddock wrote:
---Original Message---
From: flacycads [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02/25/03 05:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Mandrake Out of Control?
snip
Anyone who dual boots with windows on the same hardware knows that
On Thursday 20 February 2003 04:07 am, Sridhar wrote:
I am having problems printing documents from my W2k machine. I have my
deskjet printer connected to Mandrake server.
I am able to print from my server, but the documents from my W2k machine
does not print.
I end up having files numbered
On Sunday 16 February 2003 10:44 am, Guy Zelck wrote:
Hi,
Simon Ree wrote:
Guy Zelck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Will there ever be a KDE3.1 version released for 8.x?
I only now can say that I've got my 8.1 system like I want it to be. In
the mean time Mandrake raced versions,
On Saturday 15 February 2003 05:33 am, Felix Miata wrote:
Anyone know who sells notebook PC's without the windoze tax included in
the price? Wal Mart Tiger Direct only seem to sell ordinary PC's that
way.
check dell
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
On Thursday 13 February 2003 10:51 pm, g wrote:
Michael Noble wrote:
I have just added a scsi card (adaptec) and a DDS4 4mm dat drive.
How do I get Linux to know the tape drive is installed and talking
to it?
mike,
please excuse delay in replying. isp and i are having growing pains.
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:29 pm, Dave Laird wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Good evening, Damon...
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 07:05 pm, Damon Lynch wrote:
It still may matter. But I don't know - that's why I am asking :-)
Supposing you have a UDMA 100 as
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:31 am, Dave Laird wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
G'morning, ET...
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 04:08 am, et wrote:
Without doing a *lot* of testing I'd hazard a guess that is as good a
generalization as you could find anywhere
On Sunday 09 February 2003 12:04 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
Hi,
Due to a total loss of my working 9.0 system - messed around with
fsck.ext3 - I lost some config files and now i'm in trouble :(
I set up 9.1Beta3 without any problems and it's great! Now I wanted to
use Mutt together with
On Sunday 09 February 2003 12:49 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 07:08 am, Tom wrote:
I upgraded my ML8 system to ML9.0. I attempted to use te lock screen
function, and it has ceased to function correctly. It was working under
On Saturday 08 February 2003 09:06 am, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Vincent Danen wrote:
Agreed. It's pretty solid. I did manage to hang my cooker box once or
twice, but hey, it's cooker. I expect this sort of stuff occassionally.
I can lock my 9.0 box at will, just capturing video or trying to
make mrproper?
On Friday 07 February 2003 08:14 am, stefmit wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Please bare with me - have not compiled a new kernel since the days of 1st
edition of Yggdrasil ;( - so - just recently got the new ...-24mdk source
from the updates, happily installed the source from the rpm,
On Friday 07 February 2003 01:44 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:34 -0700, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Fri Feb 07, 2003 at 07:22:34PM +0100, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
The announcement is available at
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/press/briefs?n=/mandrakesoft/news/2
On Thursday 06 February 2003 03:38 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 06:15, et wrote:
I have noticed that Redhat, and M$ has lately published listing
reguardiing expected support cycles, and all of them are shorter than
what most people expect for manufactured products
On Thursday 06 February 2003 03:38 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 06:15, et wrote:
I have noticed that Redhat, and M$ has lately published listing
reguardiing expected support cycles, and all of them are shorter than
what most people expect for manufactured products
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 05:05 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 05 Feb 2003 9:03 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
Great. after september 30 this year I won't have a single
supportable box U Gentlemen. Are you going to give me new
laptops with my 9.1 distro? It wouldn't
music CDs do not get mounted, just played
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 08:09 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
I dont remember, its been awhile since i have used supermount. Once i
started having the probs a few months ago i disabled supermount after
reading an article somewhere stating that it has
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 07:53 am, Robert Wideman wrote:
Mine with supermount -i disable used after install.
/dev/scd0 /mnt/cdrom auto
codepage=850,iocharset=iso8859-1,noauto,nosuid,ro,umask=0,user,nodev
0 0
/dev/scd1 /mnt/cdrom2 auto
in bios, turn plug and play aware OS to off
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 04:40 am, Birkoff wrote:
Hello
I have a MSI MS-6580 motherboard with 845PE chipset
The problem is that when mdk9 boots it gives me
PCI device 0:1f:1 was disabled because of resource collision
and because of that the
I have noticed that Redhat, and M$ has lately published listing reguardiing
expected support cycles, and all of them are shorter than what most people
expect for manufactured products, but this is the way of things, and even
more so with computers, since the hardware is planned to be obsolete
SCNR???
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:04 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 13:46 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
That fits with my experience. Also, if you panic and umount it from c/l
you tend to upset it. Closing all, as you say, usually does it. One
variatioon on your
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 09:32 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:23 -0500, et wrote:
SCNR???
Sorry Could Not Resist
(if you were asking for the meaning)
A kind of preventive measure when you know you may get spanked for
what you did or wrote. Most important
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:35 pm, Belkie, Dan wrote:
Hey guys!
Is anyone using a Linux box with software as a load balancer between 2 web
servers?
If so what software?
I have been looking and have found:
http://www.turbolinux.com/products/tcs/index.html
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 12:35 pm, Belkie, Dan wrote:
Hey guys!
Is anyone using a Linux box with software as a load balancer between 2 web
servers?
If so what software?
I have been looking and have found:
http://www.turbolinux.com/products/tcs/index.html
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 04:59 am, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:22, Vincent Danen wrote:
On Tue Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:32AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
..
Well, be that as it may, did DrakX ever advertise this windows-alike
behaviour? Did it say that if you
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 04:01 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 01:01, Michael Adams wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:15, Will Styles wrote:
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 05:43 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
J.P. Pasnak wrote:
snip
If you want to change it on a per-user basis,
TOP post have you tried this ? from the errrata page...
Why: The installer misconfigured the medium description of Contribution
packages.
Solution: Insert the Installation CD (CD-ROM #1) and issue the command
urpmi.update cdrom8 as root
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 07:43 am, Franki wrote:
I
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 02:00 pm, Christopher Kolar wrote:
Hi. I recently had an 8.x box go up in flames,
so,,, what did you do to get the smoke out of them little boxes,,, and what
color was the smoke???
sorry i don't have more info about the real problem, are you saying you can
not ssh
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 12:55 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:43 -0800, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 01:42, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday 04 Feb 2003 5:39 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
Anne .. whith me being blind in one eye and unable to see
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 03:53 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 15:37 -0500, et wrote:
one of this thread was the one you offered to test for Preador, the Star
office presentation that gave an error when saving to Powerpoint, but
could be cut and pasted to a new file
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:29 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
BTW how is win2000 never tried it
(seriously)
let me tell you about a OS that bites...
I run a SMP box, (p3 1000s) that is sweet with Mandrake SMP, and I used to
show people how much slower winME was on the same box, (knowing full
try sending the starimpress presentation to me off list... let's see if the
same thing happens here..
I have a starimpress presentation that I must save as a powerpoint
presentation. Trying to do so from either staroffice 6.0 or OO 1.0.1 fails
with a beep and a General error input/output
more likely it may be you are attempting to run at your hard drives faster
speeds than the MObo, chipset and drives can stand and they are getting noise
and chatter and EMF
On Monday 03 February 2003 07:31 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 03 Feb 2003 12:27 pm, tarvid wrote:
I am convinced
ok, here is the kick in the crotch I could not save it in SO powerpoint, so
i created a new presentation, copy and pasted all the slides to the new
presentation, and it saved with no problem.
On Monday 03 February 2003 01:20 pm, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:57 -0800,
so, ron, is there any change in te error mesages if you use su - instead of
su? is that the only message, and does kpackage work? does it start at all?
On Monday 03 February 2003 06:24 pm, Ron Stodden wrote:
What is KDE doing all this for when I run kpackage in a terminal?
This situation
I would like to thank Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] who posted this
last weekend, and now has it working for even those of us on
Earthlink-mindspring
Hi all,
Given the amount of traffic and passion related over the last few days
concerning things totally off topic where Mandrake Linux is
You want it to sound like these powers were not part of the same set of
allies; but they were. It was not a double war, it was a single war on
two fronts.
LX
ehh,,, they sure did not surrender together.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
Frankl says To put it simply, we MUSTN'T judge Bush, because we have no idea
what he knows..
I say very wrong statement,,, absolute power corrupts absolutely. We MUST
Judge the Government continueally, if we are ever to hope to have a
government by the people, for the people and of the people.
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:14 am, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:53 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
That's right, Chuck; that's exactly what you would expect from a
brainwashed socialist liberal with absolutely no facts on their side
except for worthless emotional
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 11:32 am, Sascha Noyes wrote:
The terms socialist and liberal are mutually exclusive.
Sascha Noyes
so that is your final say on that? or how do you realy feel?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Take it offlist or people will start getting booted from the list. I
don't have the capability to do it right now, but I will request it if
this thread continues too much longer.
don't do that, don't even threaten it. these are very helpful folks that feel
a need to discuss this. besides,
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
