Re: RF transmission problem

On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Steve Stuart wrote: > Yes, I did edit ax25d.conf (smile). You can be confident that I'm not > bootlegging your callsign. ;-) > The radio baud rate is 9600, and I'm pretty sure the serial baudrate is as > well. This is easy to check via minicom. > How do I reset kiss mode with

Re: RF transmission problem

On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Steve Stuart wrote: > I've just installed the ax-25 stuff, >node-0.3.0-1.i386.rpm, > libax25-0.0.7-1.i386.rpm > ax25-tools-0.0.5-1.i386.rpm > ax25-apps-0.0.4-1.i386.rpm > on RedHat 6.2 system (2.2.14-5.0) with a pentium 133 and 80M > ram. Recomp

Re: GW-List - Mkiss and Polled BPQ

On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Albert D. Lawson wrote: > The mkiss docs say that to use it with TNC's that have the polled kiss > proms by G8BPQ that you use the -c and -p arguements. I have three > TNC's on one serial port with BPQ polled kiss proms, the addresses are > C, D, and E. So far, only one TNC

Re: aiee, killing interrupt handler?

On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Stephan Loges wrote: > > > I don't know whether it's an 2.0.x issue, but I remember a ax25-bug where > > > the kernel oopses when you ifconfig'ed down your ax25 network interface > > > (or was it axctl ...-kill ??) while there was an ax25 connection open. > > > Reason was a f

Re: EPP adapter woes

On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Jens David wrote: > > Once the > > interface is up, packets never come out the h/w even > > though listen -a shows them going. > > This is not so good. Check that in BIOS setup EPP version 1.9 > is selected and/or check for a BIOS upgrade. In addition to that > (this might so

Re: aiee, killing interrupt handler?

On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 03:13:59PM +, Stephan Loges wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Richard Adams wrote: > > > I must say the trace does ring some bells with me, i seem to remember more > > > about a ax25_timer problem, as to what it was or a

Re: KPPP problems

On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > And once upon a time ham operators were helpful people > Could I refer you some of the Linux Hams to the Amateur Code as > published in the ARRL handbook for many years. > The Radio Amateur is > CONSIDERATE > LOYAL > PROGRESSIVE > FRIENDLY > BALANC

Re: NEWQPSK tests

On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Well, I was going to arrange a time and frequency where we could > try to make contact. If nothing else I might leave a beacon running > one day this week, if there's anyone hear who would try to copy it. > > I would be running Tomi's NEWQPSK modem fo

Re: KISS over psuedo TTY

On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Charles Brain wrote: > > What I am getting in my own task at the slave tty is sort of KISS data in that > > What I am actually receiving is 0x00 0xCC 0x07 everytime I ping. Strange. And somewhat hard to figure out without more info about what you are doing. If you want you

Re: KISS over psuedo TTY

On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Charles Brain wrote: > I am trying to set up a kiss link over a psuedo TTY without much luck. > I can do it with slip not not it seems with KISS. I am trying to set up > a link to my own application. > > the Kernel is 2.2.12-20 and I am using apps-0.0.4 and tools 0.0.5 > >

Re: soundmodem

On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Before I go into a longish talk about transforms, I's, and Q's, is there > anyone out there that regularly runs newqpsk? I'm loopback testing the > modem on vhf fm and I get a 50% error rate. I run it somewhat regularly... :) Sorry that I didn't a

ANNOUNCE: newqpsk-0.0.4

Hi all, just uploaded a new version of my newqpsk package, a NEWQPSK/Q15X25 implementation for Linux and soundcard to hes.iki.fi: http://www.hes.iki.fi/pub/ham/unix/linux/ax25/newqpsk/ In addition to the usual tarball there are source and i386 binary RPMs as well. >From the ChangeLog: 2000-

Re: Converse Bridge for RH6.1 (2.2.13) ?

On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, John F. Feist wrote: > I was wondering where I can find the source files for Converse Bridge > (TPP, HTPP...?) that will compile under RedHat 6.1 (2.2.13 kernel). > RPM's will be fine as well. > Thank you in advance, John http://www.hes.iki.fi/htpp/ -- Tomi Manninen

Re: Kernel IP routing bug

On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Arno Verhoeven wrote: > Robin Gilks wrote: > > > > Has anyone found a fix yet for the routing bug in 2.2 kernels that I > > highlighted about 5 months ago? > > Funny... Last weekend I saw the very same thing on our packet radio > node. I was just about to send a question ab

Re: kissparams & mkiss

On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Richard Adams wrote: > I belive Tomi has said before, you can ignore them, but for the record my > comments. > BTW; just about all of my ax25 stuff is modules. > > > Jun 8 19:00:25 gb7cip kernel: kissparms uses obsolete > > (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET) > > I have serveral machines

Re: SCC causes kernel crash

On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Paul Lewis wrote: > gb7cip:root /var/log # cat /proc/net/ax25 > > Segmentation fault > > gb7cip:root /var/log # tail syslog > Jun 7 12:48:28 gb7cip kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer > dereference > Jun 7 12:48:28 gb7cip kernel: current->tss.cr3 = 00a06000, %cr3

Re: SCC causes kernel crash

On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Paul Lewis wrote: > Like others, I have been suffering with a problem since December 1999 > when I switched from 2.0.35 kernel +ax25 to the new 2.2.13, 2.2.14 to > the current 2.2.15. > > The problem I have is with the Ax25 code. (maybe nothing wrong with the > code - I still

Re: New install of linux

On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Shane Deering wrote: > I might leave RH 6.2 for a while or make an extra partition for it and have > it as a boot option while working with 6.1. I wouldn't do that. I'd just go with RH6.2 and apply all the updates (that is what you should do anyway with any distribution). App

Re: About SQUID (dnsserver) ...

On Thu, 18 May 2000, r00t the LiNuXeRRR wrote: > We resolve our problem with the cache dir. Now we have another > problem ... Please solve that on some other list than linux-hams and stop crossposting to several mailing lists... -- Tomi Manninen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OH

Re: Question, was; [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5

On Sun, 14 May 2000, Stewart Wilkinson wrote: > Gerd wrote: > > > > > > Do you have a case where this leads to actual problems so we can see if > > > something needs to be fixed? > > > > Yes, I am aware of such a case. You run into problems when a > > user enters a node on L2, goes out on L2 aga

Re: Question, was; [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5

On Tue, 2 May 2000, Kjell Jarl wrote: > bpq can be set up to give welcome text to the node call as well, usually > set off though. Some thenet nodes also gives welcome texts, debending on > the set up, also over long distance (already established link level). Ok, maybe I shouldn't have stressed

RE: Question, was; [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5

On Tue, 2 May 2000, Richard Bown wrote: > While on the subject of SSID's being used, and while there is plenty of > responses. > Has there been a fix in this release to decrement the SSID of a either a L2 > or L3 connection to the node, i.e. I login as g8jvm on someone else's > system then do a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5

On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Jens David wrote: > > The later will use the netlink interface, I don't know > > how to fix net2kiss for the new DDI, and listen can easily be tweaked > > to work with all kernels. > > As I said, listen is already done, but net2kiss really puzzles me. > Maybe AF_AX25, SOCK_D

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5

On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Jens David wrote: > please calm down and let us deal with this on the facts. It was definetely > not my intention to start another flamewar when I did that announcement. Neither did I. Sorry if I seemed a little too exited earlier. > Fact is, nobody else but Jan and Joerg c

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new-AX.25 for 2.2.14 Rel. 5

On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Jens David wrote: > My future plans are the following: > I will mostly rework the complete packages. There is a lot of conceptionally > wrong stuff in there like dependencies on the stupid axports file and > /proc/*-Entries. > > Also, I will remerge ax25-tools and -apps (I d

Re: sendmail problem

On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Aaron Sethman wrote: > What I do is on my systems is allow mail to be relayed from any 44.0.0.0/8 > address. I don't know if sendmail supports this, but I do know that > postfix does. Now all I need to do is hack LZW support into postfix, and > I'll be happy :). Long time ag

Re: Unproto Path in AX25

On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:23:19AM -0500, John Gorkos wrote: > > Unfortunately, with APRS being a UI-only protocol, my beacons don't get > > propagated through the APRS system. I need to be able to do something > > like this: > > beacon -d "APRS via W

Re: Unproto Path in AX25

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, jerome schatten wrote: > John... I went through this years ago running a 1278 in kiss mode on > an fbb bbs. As soon as it receives a string which is the same as > the KISSOFF command, it drops out of kiss mode. I can't remember what > the hex sequence was, but it was reproduc

Re: Unproto Path in AX25

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, John Gorkos wrote: > Background: I am running APRSdigi on my RedHat 6.1 box, with a MFJ-1278 > hanging on ttyS0. I am using the modified AXtools from Alan Crosswell, > N2YGK. Everything is working well (aprsmon allows TCP/IP connections, > beacons are sent, etc.). What is

Re: Node query

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Robin Gilks wrote: > > > The line in my node.conf that is affected is: > > > Alias CONVers "telnet %{2:gb7ipd.ampr.org} 3600 \"/n %u %{1:160}\"" > > > > > > and its the bit in the quotes at the end that don't work no more... Actually you'll probably find that th

Re: Attention UK netrom users

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Robin Gilks wrote: > The other problem is, using 2.0.36 kernel, how do I get the netrom broadcast to > send the alias as well as the netrom call. I've set nrports the same as a 2.2 > kernel box which works OK. An adjacent node adds the call to its node list but > no alias :-(

Re: Kernel based AX25 on Sparc?

On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Geoff Blake wrote: > I may be going off at "half cock" but during a spare moment at work today > I was looking at compiling an "AX25 aware" kernel on a Sparc 10. I was > doing about a dozen other things at the time, but it appeared that > Menuconfig did not offer the same

Re: OT: T4 terminal program?

On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Gerd wrote: > sorry for being offtopic, but here at the list for me there was the > only place the T4 packet radio terminal program was mentioned. I > could not find it in the Internet, however. > Does anyone know where to get it from? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/ham/Finnish/oh

Re: VC and datagram mode?

On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Thomas Sailer wrote: > "Wilson G. Hein" wrote: > > > Is this a part of the current implementation of linux ax25 and x1j nodes? > > It's not in the stock kernel, however part of the DG2FEF/DG1KJD patch. > No idea about x1j. It works in Flexnet and Xnet. Wampes also has > som

Re: Syslog message: pg uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET)

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Bent Bagger wrote: > I am hunting an error in PG (the program for upload of files to the > Microsats) and I have turned socket debug information on by doing a > 'setsockopt(s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_DEBUG, &opt, sizeof(opt)' call. When > I inspect the system log, I now find this mes

Re: ARP Timeout problem

On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, F. D. Johnson wrote: > Hi Folks, can anyone point me in tthe right direction ? > > My system (Suse6.3), when initiating any tcpip/radio session sends out 3 > very rapid ARP requests > then, more often than not, times out before the remote end has had chance > to reply. > >

Re: DSP boards.

On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Geoff Bagley wrote: > I had not realised that stand-alone DSP boards were getting scarce. The Motorola DSP56002EVM was discontinued some time ago. Newer models are of course available but there is no direct replacement. There was a discussion on this topic on the TAPR DSPSIG

Re: newqpsk Activity?

On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Luc Langehegermann wrote: > Thanks you for reading this. I have just compiled the newqpsk package and it > seems to work. Are there already stations operating this? If yes, where? .lu is Luxembourg right? You might want to try if you can hear Joni OH2NJR's station at 3590.0

Re: Q15X25 - newpsk.0.0.1

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Jörgen Overgaard wrote: > Is there any one who has successfully compiled and run the Q15X25 > (newpsk-0.0.1) package on RedHat 6.1?? Well, I still run RH6.0 but I really don't think there are any 6.1 spesific problems... > For me it all compiles well,but when i try to start

Re: pa4ab

On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Ing. Jose A. Amador wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Tomi Manninen wrote: > > > > > Why not try Q15X25 (aka NEWQPSK). Download the package from > > > http://www.hes.iki.fi/pub/ham/unix/linux/ax25/ > > > and give it a try! > > >

RE: Routing problem

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Robin Gilks wrote: > Does anyone have a 2.0 system they can check to see if it behaves the > same as 2.2 - be nice to know if this is a 2.2 problem only. If it is > its move back time 2.0 lets you route back to the interface the datagram came in. I can verify that anytime on

Re: Routing problem

On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 07:36:57PM -, Robert A Jenkins wrote: > > For machines within the same subnet to work via an intermediate system, you > > must add specific routes to the target machines with the intermediate as a > > gateway. I set mine up i

Re: no more ipc channels

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Kjell Jarl wrote: > Thanks Tomi, yes kill -9 my.script has been performed regularly. Seems > to be a bad habit of mine, have to change it. Also, I may be doing wrong > in the expect script, node simply is left in the dark? Well sending SIGKILL to terminate node certainly does

Re: Linux FBB and Unproto list.

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Dirk Koopman wrote: > Because I wish to receive packets addressed to generalised, as it were, > "broadcast" addresses eg "DX", "ANN", "LINK" (these are examples, not > necessarily real) as well as to my callsign. I also may want to gateway UI > frames to callsigns that I know

Re: Error opening terminal

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have two TNOS executables, the second just compiled for the y2k > bug. When I try to run the new exe I get the following message: > > Error opening terminal: linux Probably it doesn't find the terminfo database. I guess the executable was compiled

Re: no more ipc channels

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Richard Adams wrote: > On Mon, 03 Jan 2000, Kjell Jarl wrote about, no more ipc channels: > > > > After using /usr/bin/node alot (I am learning script writing...) I am > > getting: > > > > [sm7gvf@pc2 test2]$ node > > LINUX:SM7GVF-5} ipc_open: Could not get an IPC channel:

Re: Linux FBB and Unproto list.

On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 1999 at 04:39:06PM -, Dirk Koopman wrote: > > Please would you answer the question? Why does it _actually_ need root > > privileges for ax25 protocol traffic? We are talking here about something > > which, whatever you do, is insecu

Re: Linux FBB and Unproto list.

On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Dirk Koopman wrote: > On 23-Dec-1999 Tomi Manninen wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Leszek A. Szczepanowski wrote: > > > >> Is ANY posibility to use unproto list (raw socket), running > >> FBB as ordinal user, not root? I was looking in kernel > >> sources, and found in AF_AX

Re: Error compiling libax25

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Craig Small wrote: > Tomi Manninen OH2BNS said: > > On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:24:43AM +, Jorge Matias wrote: > > > > Probably you don't have symbolic links: > > >

Re: Error compiling libax25

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 10:25:03PM +0200, Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:24:43AM +, Jorge Matias wrote: > > > > Pr

Re: Error compiling libax25

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:24:43AM +, Jorge Matias wrote: > > Probably you don't have symbolic links: > > /usr/include/asm to /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386 > > /usr/include/linux to /usr/src/linux/include/linux > > And be glad that you don't

Re: Config help required..

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Rob Compton wrote: > > Hamish, after loading soundmodem.o/baycom.o/yam.o module and > > correctly configure this driver we got network device, such > > as sm0, bc0 etc. This device can be used for IP over AX25, but, > > we can't make simple 'call' for connecting to other sta

Re: Route

On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I need help to lock a route in net/rom. Sk7hw is heard on my port1 but i > cant connect this way. My connectway is on port2 via sk7bk-5. How can i lock > the port so that the connection goes the right way? I have tryed nrparms > -nodes sk7hw-5 - vxo

Re: ax25 mod being opened and not closed!

On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Richard Adams wrote: > No it certanly does not look normal, just how o you attaqch the > interfaces,? i hope not with kissattach, ifconfig is the way to go. What??? -- Tomi Manninen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OH2BNS AX.25: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Interesting High Speed Engineering Project from WSU

On Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Cathryn Mataga wrote: > >> Yeah, I wonder if it would work just sending raw TCP/IP without any ax25 headers > >> at all. Aren't the crc's and packet lengths and all that stuff just transmitted >twice? > > > >I'm not sure. Need to include amateur callsigns in there somewhere,

Re: Interesting High Speed Engineering Project from WSU

On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Riley Williams wrote: > Perhaps the following URL will be of interest to you... > > Q> http://www.tapr.org/tapr/pdf/AX25.2.2.pdf > > ...it is the current 2.2 specification of the AX.25 protocol in Adobe > Acrobat format. Be warned in advance that it's around 1.6M in size, s

Re: Virtual console corrupted with xfbbC

On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Alexandre Fornieles wrote: > When i start a chat with a user connected to FBB, with '=F1CAY', the > concole gets completely corrupted. Characters become unreadable and it > remains in this state even when leaving xfbbC and logging out from that > console. I mean, there are cha

Re: mkiss.c: uninitialized function (kernel)

On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Jorge Matias wrote: > >gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.2.13/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > >-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fno-strength-reduce > >-m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586 > >-DMODULE -c -o mkiss.o mki

Re: 1 mswin, 1 linux, 1 TNC

On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Chris Ruffin wrote: > -Connect the TNC to a serial port on the linux machine, run > kissattach. > -Connect the windows and linux machines together using the > serial ports. Run kiss mode software on the windows station, > run kissattach on the linux machine on that serial in

Re: QRZ! + node

On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, James S. Kaplan KG7FU wrote: > Actually, I was looking to usse the cdrom and perhaps the unix/linux > files supplied on it. If there is a command line tool to query a callsign then interfacing that to LinuxNode should be simple. Just use the extcmd facility, probably you wan

/proc/.../neigh interface (Was: Re: TCP/IP config/connect problem)

I wrote: > > PS. Does anyone have a pointer to a document describing the > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/ interface? /usr/src/linux/Documentation/proc.txt (searching for a brown paper bag...) -- --- Tomi Manninen / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / OH2BNS @ OH2RBI.FIN.EU ---

Re: TCP/IP config/connect problem

On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Ron Jochems wrote: > Can you help me find the archive .?. > Is it online, or also downloadable.?.. -- --- Tomi Manninen / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / OH2BNS @ OH2RBI.FIN.EU ---

Re: Killing KIssattach Kills Linux!

On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Joachim Holst wrote: > > What makes you (two) think the crashing is caused by anything AX.25 > > related? Do you see something AX.25 related in the Oops dump when it > > happens? If so, what? Please give us something usable to work with. Find > > the Oops in your system log a

Re: nrparms command error with new ax25 tools

On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Kai Altenfelder wrote: > > It's now available at ftp.hes.iki.fi aka ftp.oh7lzb.ampr.org: > > > > ftp://ftp.hes.iki.fi/pub/ham/linux/ax25/ax25-tools-0.0.5-oh2bns.patch.gz > > Is this patch needed for every distribution or for RH only? The patch fixes a bug in nrparms and

Re: Baycom installation fails

On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No error messages whatsoever. Still the device /dev/bc0 (51,0) remains > dead. I also read about the new devices bcsf0 etc., but those do not exist on > my system. I'd like to create them using mknod, however I do not know which > major number to use

Re: nrparms command error with new ax25 tools

On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Arno Verhoeven wrote: > > > Everything is looking pretty good except the nrparms portion of my startup > > > script. When it executes an nrparms command directly in the script ... and > > > when it runs the embedded nrparms command in the nodes.save file saved by > > > the no

Re: Notebook and Linux/AX25.....

On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 10 Oct, richadr wrote: > > > I want to buy a notebook, but it must be able to run Linux > > (preferably SuSE 6.2). Anyone out there that can tell me > > something about the possibillities and impossibillities > > or perhaps redirect me to the ri

Re: TCP/IP config/connect problem

On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Elan Portnoy wrote: > I have kernel based ax25 connects working ok. The trouble I am experiencing > is with my TCP/IP connections. My IP is 44.68.48.216, the IP of the nearest > node is 44.68.48.1. I used ifconfig to set ax0 with my IP and added the > route to the 44.68.48.0 n

Re: Problems compiling ax25-utils-2.1.42a

On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Dirk Koopman wrote: > I am confused. Are the new ax25 tools a complete replacement for 2.1.42a on > all kernels (ie 2.0.35 upwards) or just 2.2.x kernels or 2.3.x kernels? The lib/tools/apps are an almost complete replacement for the utils for 2.2.x kernels. Almost complete

Re: AX.25 Layer 1

On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Dirk Koopman wrote: > On 28-Sep-99 Samuel A. Falvo II wrote: > > I'm looking for the physical characteristics for AX.25, as used on the VHF > > bands. Any ideas? Would they be on tapr.org? (Of course, I'll look there > > anyway, but it doesn't hurt to ask.) > > layer 1 =

Re: Problems compiling ax25-utils-2.1.42a

On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Jaime Robles wrote: > Hello all! > I am having BIG problems with the last ax25-utils... > Since i update to linux 2.2.12 (from 2.0.36) my ax25 connection stopt > working... > I only used "call" to connect the DX-cluster, but for a week or less i > have been "fighting" the PC

Re: Antwort: Re: new kernels

On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Richard Adams wrote: > Well the way in which i would do it, a way which has been flamed many > times is the same way G4KLX once sent out a patch for, i have los the > patch, but the idea is just change the default max backoff time from > 120 seconds to what ever you want, i s

Patch for kernel 2.2.12

Hello all! I meant to send this last weekend but... Anyway according to Alan kernel version 2.2.13 is still at least a couple of weeks away, so I uploaded my patch to hes.iki.fi for people to test. The patch can be downloaded at: ftp://ftp.hes.iki.fi/pub/ham/linux/ax25/linux-2.2.12-bns.diff.g

Re: Antwort: Re: new kernels

On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Tom , tnx for the reply, now I'm getting really confused, as I have > already set the retry timers to linear, but they still behave as > exponential timers. I was told that the kernel timers in 2.0.36 are > exponential, Can this be clarrified ? T

Re: Kernel 2.2.12 select()/accept() broken ?

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Cathryn Mataga wrote: > >I had that problem on my system (RedHat 5.1, kernel 2.2.9). Because I > >couldn't solve the problem, I decided to reinstall on a new harddisk the > >latest RedHat with the 3 ax25 packages. Guess what? LinuxNode started to > >work again perfectly fine.

Re: Kernel 2.2.12 select()/accept() broken ?

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Jorge Matias wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote: > > > This sounds very similar to the problem _some_ people have had with > > LinuxNode on 2.2.x kernels. The most visible symptom of the bug is that an > > incoming AX.25 conn

Re: kissattach : cannot open axports file

On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Jose Angel Amador Fundora wrote: > Weeellsince I jumped to RedHat, I have had to make a symlink from > a fake /axports to the real /etc/ax25/axports for it to work. > > Somebody explained that it is a bug somewhere in RedHat or the ax25- > utils that the proper director

Re: Kernel 2.2.12 select()/accept() broken ?

On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Craig Small wrote: > Tomi Manninen said: > > It seems the interface to getname has changed a bit. From that code I > > deduce that &len is now supposed be _filled_in_ by sock->ops->getname(). > > At least inet_getname() does that. And it's now move_addr_to_user() that > > han

Re: ax25_get_info() - TNT&BayCom modem

On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Jan Wasserbauer wrote: > Is there any reason why linux/net/ax25/af_ax25.c - ax25_get_info() > disables interrupts ? Probably because ax25_get_info reads kernel internal tables that could be changed from an interrupt. You would crash the kernel nicely if you happened to be jus

Re: Kernel 2.2.12 select()/accept() broken ?

On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Jan Wasserbauer wrote: > Hi everyone on the list .. > > Part of checklogin() function: > ... > tv.tv_sec = 0; > tv.tv_usec = 0; > > if (select (maxsock + 1, &rfds, NULL, NULL, &tv) <= 0) > return; > > for (i = 0; i < listen_sock_num; i++) > { > if (!FD_I

Re: ax25ipd errors out

On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Peter Grace wrote: > device /dev/ttyS0 (error was 'fetching tty device parameters: Invalid > argument') Don't know whats wrong here. Oh, except in the script below you have already used ttyS0 for kissattach. You can't of course have two processes use the same serial port at

Re: New lib,tools and apps

On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Craig Small wrote: > Bob Meyer said: > > Craig Small wrote: > > > The latest lib, tools and apps for ax25 are out. The main difference > > > between this version and the last is I finally got my act together and > > > put Tomi's patches in. > > > > > > > Call is broken he

Re: Is Netrom/node ok in 2.2.5 ?

On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, pa3gcu wrote: > I have Redht 6.0 libax25-0.0.5 ax25-apps-0.0.3 ax25-tools-0.0.4 > installed following the INSTALL and README, however NETROMD gives; > Aug 19 20:16:55 pa3gcu netromd[]: netromr: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument > I have a bpq interface between two computers. >

Re: listen utility and permissions

On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Ronnie Hale wrote: > I'm with you on this too, Gerd. Fortunately, there exists such a program, > TNT. TNT is similar to SP (Eskay Packet), and while it works as a front-end > to DPBOX, it is also an excellent stand-alone packet terminal program. It > doesn't have the mill

Re: listen utility and permissions

On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Gerd wrote: > Hmm *thinking*... > I thought you need root permissions in order to open the socket? > Did you have a version of listen that used to have only that part for > opening the socket set to UID root? > How about two different versions of a listen utility? So it wo

Re: listen utility and permissions

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Gerd wrote: > Hello Tomi, hello all, > > I don't see the need for such an elaborate arrangement, at least if the > > only reason was to replace the current "listen". Listen has no user > > interaction and it should be pretty easy to make sure it has no buffer > > overflows o

Re: Problems with ax25-tools-0.0.4 and Kernel 2.2.11

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Robert Schelander wrote: > I've tried to compile ax25-tools-0.0.4 > './configure' worked without any problems, but > when I try to 'make install' I get the following message: > > axctl.c:93: structure has no member named 'digi_count' > > what could be the reason? This has

Re: listen utility and permissions

On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Gerd wrote: > So it seems there must be a solution like the following available to > avoid setting the whole terminal program UID root: > > On the socket listens a daemon with UID root that could be started > upon system boot or with sudo or something else to assure its ro

Re: soundmodem tcp/ip point2point

On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Bernd Thallner wrote: > i want to make a point to point connection via soundmodem. > i can ping the points/computers but no one is answering. > in smdiag i can see the signal. > > my configuration: > > -- computer a kernel 2.2.10 > insmod ax25 > insmod hdlcdrv > setcrystal

Re: sucess story! upgrade from RH4.2 -> RH6.0

On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Thomas M. wrote: > To get this far, I've had to patch a couple of files : > > in libax25 kernel_netrom.h is missing the definition of SOL_NETROM, after > browsing some sources i found out that this should be 259, so I added a > #define SOL_NETROM 259 to the file... This o

Re: ANNOUNCE: dev-hams mailing list

On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Terry Dawson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:22:35PM +, Julian Munoz Dominguez wrote: > > So it's the freedom of the subscribers of this mail-list to keep on > > beeing a closed group (less closed that before, but still closed)... > > Personally I am sure that I wou

Re: Compiling new AX25 stuff on Slackware 3.6

On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Gareth Rowlands wrote: > The slackware 3.6 has been augmented with Kernel 2.2.10 and net-tools 1.52 > The glibc already supplied with the distribution is 2.0.7 > ax25-tools-0.0.4 > > > Stops compiling with an error relating to a structure member in axctl.c

Re: Compiling new AX25 stuff on Slackware 3.6

On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Craig Small wrote: > Kai Altenfelder said: > > open("/usr/etc/ax25/axports", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > > ^ > [...] > > Where the hell does this prefix "/usr/etc" come from? An error of the > > libax25 function "ax25_config_load_ports()"? > Yep, so

Re: 6pack: spattach won't die !

On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Andreas Koensgen wrote: > I've tested the problem on the weekend and could reconstruct it. > I've discovered even another error -- when killing spattach > after a TCP connection has been opened the kernel panics with > the messages "killing interrupt handler" and "unable to ki

Re: Virtual Netrom circiut/Ip over Netrom

On Sun, 8 Aug 1999, Glasscock Family wrote: > I haven't seen anything on this so here is my question: I have the > standard ax25 tools, version 2.1.42 or whatever that is, and I am > trying to set up a link to someone using TCP/IP carried over netrom, > for the netrom man page: IP traffic may be

Re: Redhat aout -> tpp

On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Kjell Jarl wrote: > RH 6.0 and tpp (convers server). > I have no lib /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linuxaout/egc-2.91.66/ > thus, tpp will not compile. > Any sugestion to this? > Would any one's else binary run here? Try HTPP at . -- --- Tomi Manninen /

RE: radio.linux.org.au

On Thu, 5 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > is § a defined SGML/HTML entity? I'm betting if we renamed the > > variable to something else it wouldn't happen. > > > > I'm betting also it's a browser bug. That would make sense. My dictionary describes § as section mark... Clearly a browser bu

RE: radio.linux.org.au

On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, BBAGGER wrote: > I didn't get it when I looked at PB/PG for Linux. Hmm... It seems to be dependent on he browser version. Just tested with Nescape 4.61 (Linux) and viewing the document source (the first item on the first page): 7plus/FBB This link works without any proble

radio.linux.org.au

Hi! Am I the only one that gets an error message when trying to look at the package description: 1064: You have an error in your SQL syntax near '§pat=packet' at line 1 Warning: 0 is not a MySQL result index in /home/pa4tu/radio/pkgdetail.phtml on line 22 Manually changing the '§' in the U

Re: soundmodem on SBPro

On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Thomas Sailer wrote: > Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote: > > > > On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > Do you think it is a problem to operate with the squelch open always? > > > The soundmodem seems to do a pretty good carrier det

  1   2   >