Version of a couple of weeks ago, Xforms.
When text is selected, either manually or with find, it is not replaced
with the double quote character. Other typed characters replace the
double quotes.
I'm set for the american left and right curlies.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of
Version of a couple of weeks ago, Xforms.
When text is selected, either manually or with find, it is not replaced
with the double quote character. Other typed characters replace the
double quotes.
I'm set for the american left and right curlies.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:17:43PM +0100, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you check the various licenses to make sure that you have the
right to distribute this? And what about the Qt license?
To be honest, I have no
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:04:09PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:39:21AM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
I can compile it for you using latest commercial Qt3 (enterprise) as long as
you put proper exclusion in the license.
I have done it several times with other software,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:24:03PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:18:02AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
But that would still mean you need approval of all contributors to change
the licence, wouldn't it?
No. Permission was never obtained to switch
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:36:50AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
GPL with may be linked to whatever?
It's very close to this. I sat down, analyzed what happened, applied
the law, and wrote the qualification
Sorting through my old mail, I found this. It's John's patch that
uncorrected the license. Reversing this solves the problem, as neither
John nor anyone else had the legal standing to make this change.
This patch should be reversed. Note that QT/xforms is not the only
difference; the other
OK, I've dug them out; here is the context of the license.
Also note that it was Asger, not Lars, that committed the (correct)
license.
However, I was expecting one more round of editing when he did it--it's
missing a clause reserving future changes to lyx rather than the FSF
(would have become
Argh, I didn't include before sending.
Here are the old posts from my old mail, headers and all, with the
discussions from when we fixed the license. I'd forgotten just how much
more, uhh, perturbed John Weiss was about the High Church of Emacs than
I was :)
And it was Asger, not Lars, who
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:25:07PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
the hole cannot be fixed without permission of all contributors.
so why not get it and fix the license?
Last time around, we figured that contacting them all would be an
impossibility (we're not even sure who they are for some of
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:17:43PM +0100, Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
> "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Did you check the various licenses to make sure that you have the
> > right to distribute this? And what about the Qt license?
> To be honest,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:04:09PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 08:39:21AM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
> > I can compile it for you using latest commercial Qt3 (enterprise) as long as
> > you put proper exclusion in the license.
> > I have done it several times with other
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:24:03PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:18:02AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > > But that would still mean you need approval of all contributors to change
> > > the licence, wouldn't it?
> > No. Permission w
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:36:50AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > > GPL with "may be linked to whatever"?
> > It's very close to this. I sat down, analyzed what happened, applied
> > th
Sorting through my old mail, I found this. It's John's patch that
uncorrected the license. Reversing this solves the problem, as neither
John nor anyone else had the legal standing to make this change.
This patch should be reversed. Note that QT/xforms is not the only
difference; the other
OK, I've dug them out; here is the context of the license.
Also note that it was Asger, not Lars, that committed the (correct)
license.
However, I was expecting one more round of editing when he did it--it's
missing a clause reserving future changes to lyx rather than the FSF
(would have become
Argh, I didn't include before sending.
Here are the old posts from my old mail, headers and all, with the
discussions from when we fixed the license. I'd forgotten just how much
more, uhh, perturbed John Weiss was about the High Church of Emacs than
I was :)
And it was Asger, not Lars, who
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:25:07PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > the hole cannot be fixed without permission of all contributors.
> so why not get it and fix the license?
Last time around, we figured that contacting them all would be an
impossibility (we're not even sure who they are for some
I've been trying to update on two machines for several days now, with no
success. I've distcleaned, and even rm -r'd the src directory. Still
no luck. I've run autogen.sh and reconfigure. I've shed hair on my
keyboard.
Ultimately, I removed the entire directory and did a fresh checkout. It
I've been trying to update on two machines for several days now, with no
success. I've distcleaned, and even rm -r'd the src directory. Still
no luck. I've run autogen.sh and reconfigure. I've shed hair on my
keyboard.
Ultimately, I removed the entire directory and did a fresh checkout. It
I haven't seen anything like this in a while.
February 6 devel, plain old xforms (does anything else actually work,
anyway?)
I tried to spellcheck my file, lyx hung for about 15 seconds. gdb
shows:
Error: The file /home/hawk/Research/Price/price.dict is not in the
proper format.
Ispell read
I haven't seen anything like this in a while.
February 6 devel, plain old xforms (does anything else actually work,
anyway?)
I tried to spellcheck my file, lyx hung for about 15 seconds. gdb
shows:
Error: The file "/home/hawk/Research/Price/price.dict" is not in the
proper format.
Ispell read
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:54:46PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:59:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| I have never been able to use that interface, and it buys us precisely
| nothing, and costs a lot.
Poor John,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 12:54:46PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, John Levon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:59:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> > > | I have never been able to use that interface, and it buys us precisely
> > > | nothing, and costs a lot.
> Poor
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:43:58PM +, John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:41:34PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I want default usable interfaces that do not require book-learnin'
I've never seen a search-and-replace dialog that would qualify as more
usable than a minibuffer
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:08:25AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
If you want my opinion, I think shorcuts are useful when they are on the
first letter. With some effort I can use if they are on the first letter of
the second word, but if I have to find the underlined letter in the middle
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
Insert-List TOC
O
etc
I know. The question was if there are examples of 'natural' letter which
aren't the first one. Are those of your example particularly better than
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:43:58PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:41:34PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > I want default usable interfaces that do not require book-learnin'
> > I've never seen a search-and-replace dialog that would qualify as "more
> > usable" than a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:08:25AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> If you want my opinion, I think shorcuts are useful when they are on the
> first letter. With some effort I can use if they are on the first letter of
> the second word, but if I have to find the underlined letter in the middle
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:00:49PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> > Insert->List & TOC
> > O
> I know. The question was if there are examples of 'natural' letter which
> aren't the first one. Are those of your example particularly better than
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 07:40:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Alfredo Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I'm wondering... Maybe it's a stupid idea, but it seems to me that it would
| not be so difficult to set up a pair of shell scripts to automatically
| assign unique shorcuts to
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 07:40:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I'm wondering... Maybe it's a stupid idea, but it seems to me that it would
> | not be so difficult to set up a pair of shell scripts to automatically
> | assign unique
a is used as the accellerator/shortcut for both Draft mode and
Apply in the insert graphics dialog.
It causes draft mode; the correct behavior would be Applay, just like
everywhere else.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
After unindenting lots of floats, it finally occurred to me: Even when
indentation is used for paragraph breaks in the body, it makes no sense
to indent within a float--the preference should be overridden.
The nature of the float is that it's its own thing away from the text.
I've tried, but
While it is possible to change the selection in insert-reference with
the up/down keys, this cannot be done until the mouse is moved into the
scroll-window (is that the right term?). This is odd and frustrating.
If the keys are ususable, home/end and pageup/down should probably also
work.
hawk,
The new tabbed design is nice, but the wonderful old preview button is
gone!
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of Xand
"a" is used as the accellerator/shortcut for both "Draft mode" and
"Apply" in the insert graphics dialog.
It causes draft mode; the correct behavior would be Applay, just like
everywhere else.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL
After unindenting lots of floats, it finally occurred to me: Even when
indentation is used for paragraph breaks in the body, it makes no sense
to indent within a float--the preference should be overridden.
The nature of the float is that it's its own thing away from the text.
I've tried, but
While it is possible to change the selection in insert-reference with
the up/down keys, this cannot be done until the mouse is moved into the
scroll-window (is that the right term?). This is odd and frustrating.
If the keys are ususable, home/end and pageup/down should probably also
work.
hawk,
The new tabbed design is nice, but the wonderful old "preview" button is
gone!
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of Xand
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:39:32PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
How do we contact Mate to get him to filter out all these messages
from big at boss dot com. I though that he had a spam filter set up.
In fact, he must do because this irritating bugger is the only one to
get through more than
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:41:18PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:35:29AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I actually have a line for that addres in my filters that catches both
the direct spam and the stuff that comes here. The only address I've
been bothered
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:39:32PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> How do we contact Mate to get him to filter out all these messages
> from big at boss dot com. I though that he had a spam filter set up.
> In fact, he must do because this irritating bugger is the only one to
> get through more
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 04:41:18PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:35:29AM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I actually have a line for that addres in my filters that catches both
> > the direct spam and the stuff that comes here. The only addres
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:05:28PM +, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:38:40AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Why not use the same option for specifying either a lyx version or a
file format? It is not like we are going to release LyX 215 one of
these days...
Well,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:05:28PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:38:40AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Why not use the same option for specifying either a lyx version or a
> > file format? It is not like we are going to release LyX 215 one of
> > these days...
>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:11:59PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper
corrections (can you change this in footnote 6) to the right place in lyx
is a bit of a hassle...
It occurs to me that in the cases where footnote numbering
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:11:59PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> even if the number of footnotes is not overwhelming, going from paper
> corrections ("can you change this in footnote 6") to the right place in lyx
> is a bit of a hassle...
It occurs to me that in the cases where footnote
I'm partially thinking out loud here, so bear with me as I say stupid
things :)
As I'm understanding them right now, all forms of include and insert
actually make the other document part of the current document. What
would be really useful in many circumstances (such as what I'm working
in right
I'm partially thinking out loud here, so bear with me as I say stupid
things :)
As I'm understanding them right now, all forms of include and insert
actually make the other document part of the current document. What
would be really useful in many circumstances (such as what I'm working
in right
I've tried this with export-html, tth, and latex2html, and in both
article and book format.
The top level (chapter or section) names are lost on conversion; instead
they show as the title of the document--and navigate back to themselves.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:58:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I've tried this with export-html, tth, and latex2html, and in both
| article and book format.
What I like to know is if the crash you saw yesterday was fixed by my
patch
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 07:17:59PM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:58:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Nope. I did
err, belay that. It did work. I patched and did gmake on the main
machine (where the mail comes in), and he install on the machine I
I've tried this with export-html, tth, and latex2html, and in both
article and book format.
The top level (chapter or section) names are lost on conversion; instead
they show as the title of the document--and navigate back to themselves.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:58:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I've tried this with export-html, tth, and latex2html, and in both
> | article and book format.
> What I like to know is if the crash you s
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 07:17:59PM -0500, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:58:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Nope. I did
err, belay that. It did work. I patched and did gmake on the main
machine (where the mail comes in), and he install on the mac
I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only the
most recent paragraph upon which I was working.
Fortunately, I had just saved.
hawk, heart still pounding
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
| wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only the
| most recent paragraph upon
I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only the
most recent paragraph upon which I was working.
Fortunately, I had just saved.
hawk, heart still pounding
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I used insert lyx file to insert another file into an appendix. It
> | wiped out *everything* but the new file! Undo gave me back only t
Inside a mathed, m-c e to get a calligraphic character. The letter
is correct, but subsequent letters remain in this font. This should
(and used to be) a single character operation.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal
Inside a mathed, m-c e to get a calligraphic character. The letter
is correct, but subsequent letters remain in this font. This should
(and used to be) a single character operation.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal
A few years ago, when I needed to identify changes in my dissertation,
someone here showed me a quick and dirty way to define styles causeing
typethrough and underlining with tilde's.
Unfortunately, theose definitions apparently came out of the document by
the end.
Could someone give me a quick
A few years ago, when I needed to identify changes in my dissertation,
someone here showed me a quick and dirty way to define styles causeing
typethrough and underlining with tilde's.
Unfortunately, theose definitions apparently came out of the document by
the end.
Could someone give me a quick
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 06:14:14PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
Yes; I can't even reproduce the order or pattern of blank/nonblank. All
I have so far is that it seems to be affected by a failed import, abut
also by using anything on the menu.
Here's
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There is a very nasty bug in LyX 1.2.2 configure script: if you
configure as root and an error occurs during the configure step
(e.g. xforms not found), the the script will delete the /dev/null
device. This undoubtly leads
edit the replacement line, hit alt-r, and nothing happens
yesterday's cvs.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of Xand
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 06:14:14PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > Yes; I can't even reproduce the order or pattern of blank/nonblank. All
> > I have so far is that it seems to be affected by a failed import, abut
> > also by using
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> There is a very nasty bug in LyX 1.2.2 configure script: if you
> configure as root and an error occurs during the configure step
> (e.g. xforms not found), the the script will delete the /dev/null
> device. This undoubtly
edit the replacement line, hit alt-r, and nothing happens
yesterday's cvs.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail
These opinions will not be those of Xand
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:45:07PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2003 19:12, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I've rebuilt again today, and it still appears utterly impossible to
import a latex tabular.
I'm not sure how a latex file with a chart could
get any simpler than
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:54:29PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
ALso, I'm noticing strange behavior on the failed imports. The latex
options disappear from the import submenu. Sometimes import itself gets
greyed out. I generally have to quit to try
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:25:07PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 17:04, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I doubt it--wouldn't relyx be rebuilt with make install? The only
lyx on this system is the development branch (the reason I find so many
weird bugs :)
I would
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 06:34:33PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 17:42, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
\\ 1. int
4
9
14
\\ 2. Instructors
It is definitively reLyX's fault. The BUGS file in reLyX warns to this. In
this case you declare 15 columns
OK, I'm now happily importing tabulars. Well, mostly. I'm having
trouble with the left borders on multicolumnts. I start with:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin {tabular}
A little more poking shows that \noindent before a \begin{tabular}
is ignored. Lyx will include it if the paragraph dialog is used,
and export tex with it--but retrieving its own tex, it loses it.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL
When told to close a file, and the yes/no/cancel dialog comes up, under
plain old X, the cancel button will appear directly under the mouse.
This causes y, n, alt-y, and alt-n to all cause cancellation rather than
their intended effects.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:45:07PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2003 19:12, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I've rebuilt again today, and it still appears utterly impossible to
> > import a latex tabular.
> > I'm not sure how a latex file with a ch
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:54:29PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > ALso, I'm noticing strange behavior on the failed imports. The latex
> > options disappear from the import submenu. Sometimes import itself gets
> > greyed out. I g
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:25:07PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 January 2003 17:04, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I doubt it--wouldn't relyx be rebuilt with "make install"? The only
> > lyx on this system is the development branch (the reason I fi
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 06:34:33PM +, Jos? Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 January 2003 17:42, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > \\ 1. int
> > & 4
> > & 9
> > & 14
> > \\ 2. Instructors
> It is definitively reLyX's fault. The BUGS
OK, I'm now happily importing tabulars. Well, mostly. I'm having
trouble with the left borders on multicolumnts. I start with:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin {tabular}
A little more poking shows that \noindent before a \begin{tabular}
is ignored. Lyx will include it if the paragraph dialog is used,
and export tex with it--but retrieving its own tex, it loses it.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics/"\ ASCII ribbon campaign
[EMAIL
When told to close a file, and the yes/no/cancel dialog comes up, under
plain old X, the "cancel" button will appear directly under the mouse.
This causes y, n, alt-y, and alt-n to all cause cancellation rather than
their intended effects.
hawk
--
Richard E. Hawkins, Asst. Prof. of Economics
I've rebuilt again today, and it still appears utterly impossible to
import a latex tabular.
I'm not sure how a latex file with a chart could
get any simpler than this:
simple.tex:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Hi there
\begin {tabular}{lrr}
\\ 1. int
4
9
14
I've rebuilt again today, and it still appears utterly impossible to
import a latex tabular.
I'm not sure how a latex file with a chart could
get any simpler than this:
simple.tex:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
Hi there
\begin {tabular}{lrr}
\\ 1. int
& 4
& 9
&
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I have companion documents, one of which needs to refer to appendices of
the other.
You have to use the xr package (standard tools).
I've put
\usepackage{xr}
into each preamble, saved
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 05:02:48PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I've put
\usepackage{xr}
into each preamble, saved, and still no dice. I seem to have xr where
it belongs:
You need
\externaldocument{refered_doc}
Furthermore, I think, xr needs
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 08:35:34AM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I have companion documents, one of which needs to refer to appendices of
> > the other.
> You have to use the xr package (standard tools).
I've put
\usepackage{xr}
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 05:02:48PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > I've put
> > \usepackage{xr}
> > into each preamble, saved, and still no dice. I seem to have xr where
> > it belongs:
> You need
> \externaldocument{refe
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:26:02AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
I think I've been through this before . . .
In the article class, the table of contents uses no leading dots for the
sections, but it does for the subsections. My text, in book class, uses
I'm trying to get tables into lyx from a word document (I really don't
want to fight that ill-formatted monster in starwriter!). I can dump to
text well enough, but I want to keep the tables filled in.
I was even able to trivially get the tables into latex with a bit of vi
magic [ %s/^/ /
Oh, and here's the output from gdb:
reLyX directory is: /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX
reLyX, the LaTeX to LyX translator. Revision date 2001/08/31
Reading LaTeX command syntax
(dumb.tex: Splitting Preamble
Creating LyX preamble
Reading layout file
Cleaning... Translating... Use of uninitialized
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:50:52AM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 07:44, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:26:59AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Also, bz2 compression can handle losing bits out of the middle, unlike
gzip.
Interesting. It's
I have companion documents, one of which needs to refer to appendices of
the other.
The Insert Reference dialog quite kindly allows me to insert the
reference to a label in the other document, but puts a ?? in the output
rather than the reference.
I'm assuming that I'm missing something obvious
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:26:02AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> "Dr. Richard E. Hawkins" wrote:
> > I think I've been through this before . . .
> > In the article class, the table of contents uses no leading dots for the
> > sections, but it does for the subse
I'm trying to get tables into lyx from a word document (I really don't
want to fight that ill-formatted monster in starwriter!). I can dump to
text well enough, but I want to keep the tables filled in.
I was even able to trivially get the tables into latex with a bit of vi
magic [ %s/^/ & /
Oh, and here's the output from gdb:
reLyX directory is: /usr/local/share/lyx/reLyX
reLyX, the LaTeX to LyX translator. Revision date 2001/08/31
Reading LaTeX command syntax
(dumb.tex: Splitting Preamble
Creating LyX preamble
Reading layout file
Cleaning... Translating... Use of uninitialized
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:50:52AM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 07:44, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:26:59AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Also, bz2 compression can handle losing bits out of the middle,
I have companion documents, one of which needs to refer to appendices of
the other.
The Insert Reference dialog quite kindly allows me to insert the
reference to a label in the other document, but puts a ?? in the output
rather than the reference.
I'm assuming that I'm missing something obvious
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
