Hi there,
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>
> I am trying an internal_redirect from a POST with Mason and Apache just
> hangs:
>
Have a look at the Guide, "Caching POSTed Data".
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Uri Bernstein wrote:
> Hi,
> In order to provide a "private" development environment to each of
> our developers, we defined a virtual server per developer. Each virtual
> server has its root aliased to a different directory
> [snip]
> This seems to work fine most
Hi all,
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Randy Kobes wrote:
> > The :: are stripped on the fly, since these cannot be used in index, so
> > when you look for Foo::Bar you are actually looking for 'Foo && Bar'.
>
> That's a limitation of swish-e - you can configure it to
> index characters like $, !, ... as
Hi there,
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Reilly, Thomas wrote:
> I have to find out what the best method is for having mod_perl have
> bi-directional communication with a unix daemon process which will
> receive a string (for simplicity!) from mod_perl, (extracted from
> the client request), talk to exist
Hi there,
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Mark Hewis wrote:
> What am am really after is an exit which just restarts the child process (it
> is called in) resetting all module globals any suggestions?
die() ?
> END{} is called at the end of each processed request
They are only processed for each request
Hi there,
I found it difficult to understand exactly what you mean in some parts
of your message. I am sorry. When you give error messages and
configuration details please try to give the exact wording. Make
these parts of your message separate from the rest of the text of your
message, for ex
Hi there,
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Ime Smits wrote:
> | [error] Undefined subroutine &Apache::ASP::handler called.
> | what does it mean?
> | How to fix it?
>
> I think something went wrong during the Apache::ASP installation.
> Consider installing Apache::ASP once again with the cpan installer
>
Hi there,
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Eugene S. Panenko wrote:
> The problem is: under load above 20 requests per second after
> working some time (about 15-30 sec) Apache daemon stopts accepting
> new connections and blocks forever (without -X option httpd at this
> moment begin forking until it eats
Hi all,
I thought this might be of interest to Apache users running Linux.
> A vulnerability in some versions of Linux has recently been
> identified.
>
> SYSTEMS AFFECTED
>
> Linux kernel versions 2.2.x before 2.2.16
> (2.0.x are safe; 2.2.16 is safe)
>
> IMPACT
>
> Any local user can
Hi there,
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> use references for passing data.
But see "Advanced Perl Programming" pages 9 (Performance Efficiency)
and 44 (Using Typeglob Aliases).
73,
Ged.
Hi there
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, bill chmura wrote:
> I cant install them from CPAN because the system does not have an
> ANSI C compiler.
So get one. It's free:)
73,
Ged
Hi there,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Marc D. Spencer wrote:
> I have a mod_perl module which would like to make an HTTP request to
> a tertiary server and then process the result before possibly
> returning some subset of that data.
Don't do it that way.
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Clayton Cottingham aka DrFrog wrote:
> is there something seriously wrong with redhats
> apache and modperl rpms?
Yup.
> am i gonna have to recompile apache myself?
Yup.
73,
Ged.
Hi all,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Frank Wiles wrote:
> Where I work we store them as PerlSetVar's in the Apache config, we
> store all implementation specific things in there such as the page
> title, the URL to the module we are using, database user and
> password, etc, etc.
Like Frank I've used Pe
Hi all,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Paul Lindner wrote:
> I read somewhere that 5 bytes is equivalent to 1ms on a 28.8
> connection, so these types of optimizations are generally worth the
> effort.
Don't forget that modems can be clever too. Most do their own data
compression on the fly, so you may
Hi all,
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Paul wrote:
> I'm running out of ideas.
>
> PerlFreshRestart was completely unused, then explicitly set Off.
> I have two handlers, which seem to work well. My logs report nothing
> amiss aside from the stream of segmentation faults killing off my
> server children
Hi all,
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Farley, Scott wrote:
> I know the "rwrite returned -1" is a long fixed bug but what about
> the pages not completely loading? What version?
I was going to ask you the same question...
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Kiran Banoor wrote:
> when I Make Test, I get the following error:-
> letting apache warm up...Syntax error on line 3 of
> >/web/apache/src/modules/mod_perl-1.22/t/conf/srm.conf:
> >Invalid command 'PerlTransHandler', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a
> >module
Hi there
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Eamon Daly wrote:
> I've just run into the strangest problem I've ever had the
> misfortune of coming across. I have a form containing a
> number of various fields, including two radio buttons named
> "WHO_REGISTERED".
Well it's a bit off-the wall, but the letters
Hi there,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Jeff Jones wrote:
> It's the mod_rewrite guy again. Is there anyone who
> would be willing to provide some off list assistance?
> I just want to run a configuration by someone who
> knows more about this than I do and see if I am doing
> it right.
I'd say as lon
Hi there,
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
> harm wrote:
>
> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> > 19019 http 9 0 19844 14M 3884 S 3.9 0.7 0:13 apache.perl.new
> > 19419 http 9 0 19852 15M 4388 S 2.6 0.7 0:14 a
Hello there,
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, eric wrote:
> so how can I get the time display?
>
> in my .pl file, two lines as
> -
>
> my @time = time;
> print "Right now, the elements of the time are: @time";
Please read the email-etiquette document. It's on
Hi all,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Nick Tonkin wrote:
> One thing that's useful for both people who don't know where else to turn
> and people who don't want anything that's not pure mod_perl is simply to
> preface your subject line with [OT] ... it's then very simple to filter
> out unwanted messages
Hi there,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Aaron J Mackey wrote:
>
> I have a completely mod_perl handler-based web app set up as so:
>
>
> PerlHandler Client::WWW
> SetHandler perl-script
> PerlSetVar ConfigFile /home/ajm6q/myapp/data/www-config
>
> [snip] What I'
Hi all,
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, kyle dawkins wrote:
> Are you for real?
> [snip]
> You may not know this, but...[snip]
Er, I think you'd better have a look at the Camel Book before you dig
yourself any deeper into that particular hole. :)
And I really don't think this discussion should go any furt
Hi there,
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Mark Hawkes wrote:
> Thanks Beau, but that didn't solve anything :-( 'make test' needs to run as
> root or it can't write to the Apache directory.
[snip]
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Mark Hawkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Saturday, December 21,
Hi there,
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, eric lin wrote:
> The image "file:///home/enduser/mytest.jpg" cannot be displayed, because
> it contains errors
I think I understand your question but I am not sure of it.
It seems that you have sent a request to Apache, received a response,
and saved the respons
Hi there,
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Charlie Smith wrote:
[snip,snip]
> assume we'll see a speed up after upgrading mod_perl?
Your question is not clear. It depends on what you're doing with it.
If you're already using mod_perl then simply upgrading it won't give
you a substantial performance improvem
Hi there,
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, John Heitmann wrote:
> Over the weekend I posted here with questions about a problem where
> variables stored in pnotes did not get garbage collected. Thanks to
> some very helpful hints I was able to determine that mod_perl was
> leaking pnotes in a request with
Hi Charlie,
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Charlie Smith wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response. I was informed that we were not running mod
> Perl, but at the same time the env hash indicated we were,
Read the Guide, it has a section specifically addressing this issue.
> So, I'll try and clarify my q
Hi there,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Lee Goddard wrote:
> I've used Google to scan the mod_perl home site as
> well as Yahoo Groups to scan this list's archives,
> but found no reference to setup_inherited_listeners.
/home/ged/src/apache_1.3.27$ >>> grep -ri setup_inherited_listeners *
src/main/http_m
Hi there,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Udlei Nattis wrote:
> hi, sorry my english ;)
It's ok. :)
> modperl 2 with apache 2 thread is stable enought for start one big
> project of ecommerce?
If it were my decision I'd say not yet, use mod_perl 1.27 with Apache 1.3.27.
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Jim Morrison [Mailinglists] wrote:
> Sorry this is a little off topic... Is there a size limit on DBM's? (Or
> Linux files for that matter.. )
[snip]
> Thing is I'm getting a "write error" and it seems to always happen when
> the DBM gets to 2.0Gb ..
[snip]
> Lin
Hello there,
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, koudjo ametepe wrote:
> Do someone know how to connect to a distant host with perl (via sftp
Please read
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Blankenship, Scott R wrote:
> Basically, I extract mod_perl 1.27, and apache 1.3.1 [snip]
> What am I doing wrong?
Are you sure you want to use Apache 1.3.1?
I'm using 1.3.27 for new builds...
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
> Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry
> type script.
[snip]
> More information about this error may be available
> in the server error log.
[snip]
> Anyone got any ideas?
What does it say in the error_log?
73,
G
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
> Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :)
Are you getting core dumps?
73,
Ged.
Hi again,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote:
> not even getting a broken connection. So somehow mod_perl doesn't
> _really_ think it's an error.
Check out DEBUGGING in 'perldoc Apache::Registry'.
Apache::Registry won't always return what you'd think it should.
This has snookered more than
Hi there,
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Rob Lambden wrote:
> I have written a request handler in Perl. I recently changed some code
> in this to convert from using CGI within mod_perl to using Apache::Registry.
It's generally best to write handlers. If you have written a handler,
in general I think you
Hi there,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Vicki Brown wrote:
> I'm trying to build (rebuild) mod_perl for Apache 1.3.26. I swear I did this
> before but it was over a year ago maybe it wasn't a static build.
Maybe you'll keep some records this time? :)
> Following the instructions in INSTALL-apaci I r
Hello again,
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Vicki Brown wrote:
> At 09:27 + 2003-02-08, Ged Haywood wrote:
> >It's not clear to me what you did BEFORE these steps, and that's
> >important.
>
> It's very clear, actually, since I did nothing before these steps :
Hi there,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Devi .M wrote:
> I want to install mod_perl with apache and configure for it in
> Linux m/c. I have tried this and started the server also. When typed
> ./httpd -l in apache/bin it showed the following output
>
> http_core.c
[snip]
> mod_perl.c
Well cong
Hello there,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Rangel, Luciano wrote:
> Please help-me with error.
>
>
> waiting for server to start: .[Wed Feb 12 14:56:58 2003] [info] 20 Apache::
> modules loaded
> [Wed Feb 12 14:56:58 2003] [info] 5 APR:: modules loaded
> [Wed Feb 12 14:56:58 2003] [info] base server
Hi there,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Viljo Marrandi wrote:
> My code checks $tt->error() and it didn't show anything. But I found the
> problem, it still was perl and it was very, very stupid mistake. In that
> weird module I defined:
>
> DBIx::Recordset::Fetchsizewarn = 0;
>
> while the correct is:
Hi there,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Jozwiak, Paul wrote:
> Does anyone know why I keep getting:
>
> [Wed Feb 12 10:35:03 2003] [notice] child pid 312 exit signal Segmentation
> Fault (11)
>
> in my error_log?
No.
> I have tried rebuilding the machine, installing older
> versions of apache, differe
lly will cause more memory consumption. Something I was trying to
> avoid.
Your programming will have more effect than your use of static linking.
(Have another look at those docs... :)
73,
Ged.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thu
Hi there,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Viljo Marrandi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Ged Haywood wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Viljo Marrandi wrote:
> >
> > > DBIx::Recordset::Fetchsizewarn = 0;
> > >
> > > while the co
Hi there,
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Robert Krueger wrote:
> I'm currently upgrading an old installation (mod_perl 1.25, perl 5.005, apache
> 1.3.12 -> mod_perl 1.27, perl 5.8.0, apache 1.3.27) and
[snip]
> Can't locate loadable object for module Apache::Log
[snip]
> letting apache warm up...\c
> Synt
ore messages.
73,
Ged.
--
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 19 11:57:34 2003
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:46:12 + (GMT)
From: Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: koudjo ametepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Nick Tonkin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In my logs when dumping a warn() I see this occasionally:
>
> 192.168.0.24 at /home/wm/perl/WM/Auth/Access.pm line 28.
> 192.168.0.24 at /home/wm/perl/WM/Auth/Access.pm line 28.
> 192.168.0.24 at /home/wm/perl/WM/Auth/Access.pm line 28.
> 192.
Hi there,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Charlie Smith wrote:
> Am having problems as seen in the 'sanity check' below.
[snip]
> -lsocket -lnsl -lpthread -Wl -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/sun4-solaris/auto/DynaLoader/DynaLoader.a
> -L/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/sun4-solar
Hi there,
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Arshavir Grigorian wrote:
> I was trying to build Apache 1.3.27 + mod_perl 1.27
[snip]
> So, following the suggestion from
>
> http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/install.html#APACI_ARGS
>
> that one can pass *any* arguments to the Apache ./configure through the
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Wilcox, Curtis wrote:
[snip,snip]
> tried installing apache-1.3.27 and mod_perl-1.27, following the
> instructions in INSTALL.simple, included in the mod_perl
> source. Unfortunately when I add the following to httpd.conf, the
> apachectl configtest segfaults:
>
>
>
Hello again Charlie,
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Charlie Smith wrote:
> Yes. I used gcc to compile perl 5.8, DBI 1.30, DBD::Orace 1.12.
And Apache and mod_perl?
> I did have similar type of problem with perl 5.8 install. I changed
> all file containing 'WI,-E' to not use ',-E'. This allowed me to
>
Hi Charlie,
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Charlie Smith wrote:
> How long before something like this gets into the build process and
> out as a patch? Or is there something I could do in the interim?
As it seems that you're the only one having the problem, I meant that
*you* might fix it and submit a pat
Hi Charlie,
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Charlie Smith wrote:
> Ok. I'll give it a whack or hack or whatever you want to call it. Where are
> the Wl flags loaded from for the mod_perl stuff?
Actually they're from the Apache source, the mod_perl configuration may hack them.
The tool I use most for poki
Hi there,
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Paolo Campanella wrote:
> gdb reports that clean_child_exit is not defined - perhaps you are
> looking at newer sources than mine (1.3.22).
Is there a reason why you don't want to upgrade to 1.3.27?
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Cure wrote:
> Does Apache submit headers when a error occurs ?
> Trying to display an error message to the browser.
>
> I use mason for the web, so if I have die() statement in my code
> mason will display the error to the browser.
>
> If I use an Apache handler ->
Hi there,
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Michael Hyman wrote:
> I am not familiar with clustering
>
> Would you run a mod_perl based web site on a cluster?
If the performance and the money for the hardware are issues then
perhaps before you buy you should spend some time looking into things
like alter
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Johnson, Fred wrote:
> I haven't been successful building mod_perl with apache, and apacheSSL
> on a Solaris 2.8 with the latest recommended patches.
> I am working on a Solaris 2.8 machine, with gcc 2.95.3, perl v5.6.1,
> mod_perl-1.26, apache_1.3.22, and finally,
> apache_
Hi there,
On 5 Jun 2003, Dennis G. Allard wrote:
> Hmmm. No one has actually answered the question, although I am getting
> all kinds of advice... (-; ...
It's been good advice.
If the question to which you refer is the one in the subject line,
then one answer is look in the error log. Apach
Hi there,
On 6 Jun 2003, K Old wrote:
> No, I didn't build a threaded Perl, it seems to be the popular thing
> among any linux distro these days to build it with threads.
>
> I'll build a version without threads just to see if it works
Want to run that by me again??
> > I'm having trouble ge
Hi there,
(Replying to off-list post just this once:}
On 6 Jun 2003, K Old wrote:
> Mandrake 9.0 (and several other linux distros) come out of the box with
> Perl 5.8.0 built with threads.
Ah. For some reason I was thinking you'd built the Perl yourself.
> I'm guessing that having Perl compil
Hi there,
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Angie Ahl wrote:
> I'm having a problem getting past the maketest stage installing libapreq-1.1 (to
> get Apache::Request), Apache 1 and Mod_Perl 1
If that's all that's holding up the installation, you'd probably get
away with installing manually and not doing the
Hi there,
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> simran wrote:
[snip]
> > * Lookup the _distance_ for the planet _mercury_ on the date _1900-01-01_
[snip]
> you can get by with MLDBM or something similar.
You might also want to investigate using a compiled C Btree library which
could be t
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Igor Rojdestvenski wrote:
> designed a mod_perl handler moduel [snip]
> works fine first time, but when I refresh it, it works differently. [snip]
> My theory is that something is wrong with local/global variables [snip]
Check out the mod_perl Guide - you can find
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Kirk Rogers wrote:
> i have a collection of perl modules ... i dont want to send it out
> without at least making it somewhat difficult for some hacker to just simply
> steal it and load it somewhere else without my consent.
This is getting to be an old chestnut,
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Steven M. Carter wrote:
There's a thread here:
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/182/2000/2/0/3376687/
in which Doug MacEachern says:
"I don`t expect libapreq (or any of the Apache:: xs modules outside of
the mod_perl dist) to work under aix. it needs to poin
Hi there,
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> how do you add/activate other modules to apache in this manner.
Here's one I prepared earlier. Use caution, this is an old one and I
haven't tested it lately. The documentation is in the Eagle Book, I
don't know if it's in the CookBook, m
Hi there,
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Shashank Kailash Shringi wrote:
> I need one common entry for handlers in Location directive, both
> inside and outside virtual host.
I'm not sure I understand your problem, but I wonder if it's the sort
of thing that mod_macro could help you with?
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Ryan Farrington wrote:
> It was my assumption that apache allowed for the perl executable to be
> loaded into memory and called from then on without having to worry about
> creating the external process
Well that sort of sounds right, but instead of making assumpti
Hi guys,
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Sun Jun 01 18:51:42 2003] [notice] Apache/2.0.46 (Unix)
> > mod_perl/1.99_09 Perl/v5.8.0 mod_ssl/2.0.46 OpenSSL/0.9.6b
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20030219.txt
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Henrique Pantarotto wrote:
> 3) downgrade apache to 1.3.27 and mod_perl to 1.27 and be happy
>
> Option 3 seems okay, excect for the fact that I am that kind of Linux
> user that is always upgrading everything to the latest version possible.
> This applies to linux
Hi there,
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Dave wrote:
> I am having the exact same test failure results on openbsd
Did you build the Perl on that machine?
If not, it might be worth a shot.
73,
Ged.
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:22:26 +0100
from IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [212.22.195.7]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 553 5.3.0 Zone rejected due to abus
Hi there,
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I want to try compiling mod_perl statically
What's the question?
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Forwarded from the Israeli Perl Mongers mailing list:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:48 PM
> Subject: [Perl] HTML::Mason help anyone?
>
>
> > I
Hello again,
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Referring back to my original post, it with the options I specified, the
> compile process still insists on compiling mod_perl as a DSO. Even if I
> explicitly set USE_DSO=0 -- I wonder if one of the other flags (like
> EVERYTHING=1)
Hello there,
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Batara Kesuma wrote:
> Find Job! http://www.find-job.net is the biggest computer and internet
> related employment site in Japan.
> [snip]
> The speed improvement is significant, and the CPUs load
> average are lower than when we were running plain CGI.
Thank yo
Hi there,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> The configure process goes through and shows that it's selected a DSO
> compilation, and that's not what I want so I just stopped it.
>
> The configure process complains about PERL_SSI and says it cannot include
> that with a DSO, etc. B
Hi Forrest,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> "seems" to have worked
[snip]
> # /usr/apache/bin/httpd -l
> Compiled-in modules:
>http_core.c
>mod_so.c
>mod_dosevasive.c
>mod_perl.c
[snip]
:)
> building mod_perl is such a pain
[snip]
> thoughts on this one?
It isn't
Hi there,
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I wonder if this will affect anything else, especially other
> things that require DSO support. ?
Have you got the Eagle Book? You need
--enable-module=so
in your configure arguments to put mod_so into Apache, mod_so allows
Apache to l
nimum, and therefore the memory
> footprint very small?
Never had to worry about it a great deal, I usually just throw RAM or
boxes at it. Maybe you could have a look at Squid or something?
73,
Ged.
------
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, G
Hi all,
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote:
> We should together refrain from doing mistakes (at least publicly).
It is unrealistic (and perhaps a little Oriental?) to refuse to accept
that we make mistakes, and that we will continue to make them. It is
far more constructive to prepare f
Hi there,
On 9 Jun 2003, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Finally, the first mod_perl 1.28 release candidate #1 has arrived.
> [snip]
> Please give this release a spin
Linux 2.5.69, gcc 3.2.3, glibc 2.3.1, perl 5.8.0; 1300MHz Duron (x86).
All tests successful, 6 tests skipped.
Files=34, Tests=400,
Hi Slava,
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote:
> So, what it looks like?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modperl/message/34174
> Looks like a moment of truth.
Yup. :)
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Xavier Noria wrote:
> Hello, I've just compiled Apache 1.3.27 with mod_perl 1.27 from their
> tarballs on Solaris. perl is 5.8.0 packaged for Solaris.
>
> The installation of libapreq with cpan(1) stops here:
[snip]
> t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf
> /bin/sh: t/htt
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Ryan Dietrich wrote:
> mod_perl on Solaris
Thanks for the tips!
> things ended up being ridiculously stable (they haven't rebooted since last
> February I'm told)..
Hehe:
www2:~$ >>> top -bn1 | head
9:57am up 421 days, 19:57, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0
Hi guys,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
[snip,snip]
> keys %hash;
>
> does the trick
>
> interesting that I don't remember this issue being reported earlier.
Probably because we all read the Camel Book, section 5.4.3, the bit
about FIRSTKEY. All except Randal that is... :)
Most peop
Hi there,
On 16 Jun 2003, Clinton Gormley wrote:
> > I had a look at the memory usage of my apache/mod_perl 1 processes,
> > and was alarmed to find that only 3Mb of 25Mb processes was being
> > shared (and that's straight after startup)
I see about the same on my own server when processes get b
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
> I have a choice between the very well tested 7.3 but highly likely
> to become unsupported by RedHat soon. Or I could go for RedHat 9.0
A distribution is just a package of stuff that you could put together
yourself if you had the time a
Hi There,
On 16 Jun 2003, Clinton Gormley wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 13:03, Ged Haywood wrote:
>
> > > > I had a look at the memory usage of my apache/mod_perl 1 processes,
> > > > and was alarmed to find that only 3Mb of 25Mb processes was being
> > &
Hi there,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
[snip]
> RedHat 7.3 has the notorious gcc 2.96 - no body has been able to
> figure out whether it is actually broken or not I guess :).
[snip]
Whether it's broken or not it was never released, it escaped. :)
The developers called it a de
Hi there,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Trevor Phillips wrote:
[snip]
> The speed problem is not a connect time problem - it's actual run-time of the
> Perl code.
[snip]
> The only common thing between all the systems with the problem is they're
> using the i686 Debian package for mod_perl.
Do you know
Hi there,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Trevor Phillips wrote:
> Whether it's i686 or i386 - both mod_perl and FastCGI are using the same
> compile of perl - so what difference should there be?
Must have got my wires crossed somewhere - I thought you must be using
different Perls.
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thus without re-compiling my whole Perl 5.8.0 build I need to come
> up with a solution.
I really don't see why you don't recompile your Perl. It's not a big
deal and it's going to be a lot safer that way.
> Sorry for my ignorance but it
Hi Stas,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Please try it out:
> http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz
Neat!
73,
Ged.
Script started on Wed Jun 18 13:29:03 2003
hurricane:~/src/Apache-Test-1.03-dev$ >>> t/TEST -times=10 -order=random
*** setting ulimit to allow core fi
Hi Jaco,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As you can see it suggests rebuilding mod_perl with
> $PERL_USELARGEFILES=0 (which we do) so according to him it will work?
Well it's in the list of suggestions, I don't think that's quite the
same thing... I guess the bit about nobody lis
Hi there,
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My question now is, did Doug take this into consideration when he
> build mod_perl v1.27 (w/ PERL_USELARGEFILES=0)
I'm sure Doug took into consideration all sorts of things we never
even thought about. Try it out and let us know what happ
1 - 100 of 488 matches
Mail list logo
