On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:38:02PM -, Andy Woolley wrote:
>
> Well, it certainly seems to be pointing to MySQL.com alright.
>
> Although the domain name registrant is still NuSphere and DNS still
> appears to be handled by NuSphere's command the IPAddress it
> resolves to is definitely that o
just carrot dangling.
Does anyone have any info from the team yet?
Regards
Andy.
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick L. Steinkopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 3:09 PM
Subject: MySQL.org
> I see the MySQL.org is
I see the MySQL.org is now pointing to the MySQL.com site. I have not been
able to get an update anywhere on the Nusphere / MySQL lawsuit. The was no
recent news on the MySQL site and nusphere seems to be having server
problems. Can anyone shed some light on the latest?
sql, mysql
Fred
Too bad it's not your list to make that decision, but
Monteys
Ruben
mysql - the database written and owned by MYSQL AB
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
> >
> > > Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> > > your discussions off this li
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> next meeting.
>
> Britt...
Britt, thanks for the update. The neutral tone and lack of
substanti
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> next meeting.
>
> Britt...
Britt, thanks for the update. The neutral tone and lack of
result ma
John Birrell wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
> >
> > > Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> > > your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
> > > all means, tell us the result.
> >
> > This discussion most
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 01:13:15PM +0100, Mark Tiramani wrote:
>
> > Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> > your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
> > all means, tell us the result.
>
> This discussion most certainly is our business.
No it'
> Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
> your discussions off this list. It is none of our business. By
> all means, tell us the result.
This discussion most certainly is our business. I would appeal to both MySQL AB and
NuShphere to keep
discussions as public as i
John Birrell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> > MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> > information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> > next meeting.
> Since these issues are between two private companies,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 12:29:52PM -0400, Britt Johnston wrote:
> MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
> information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
> next meeting.
Since these issues are between two private companies, please take
your discussions
MySQL AB and NuSphere had a meeting over the phone, we exchanged
information and opinions and NuSphere will propose times for the
next meeting.
Britt...
--
D. Britton Johnston 603-578-6707 Nashua
Chief Technology Officer 781-280-4954 Bedford
NuSphere Corporation 781-280-4600 Main
14
right next to the alien abduction story in the
> National Enquirer.
> Furthermore, their behavior secondary to this, and the proposition that they
> opened the mysql.org site as a "Community" site flies right in the face
> of the proposition forwarded by NuShpere that they opened
they are not bad and
give you something to read in the restroom.
MJM
- Original Message -
From: "Van" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Meltzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: mysql.org
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:17:31AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote:
>
> I think I've made it clear that I'm not enamored of NuSphere's
> recent actions, which I think are remarkably bone-headed. At
I'm afraid the emotions aroused by recent events have stripped
away my thin veneer of reasonable civility
[ database table sql ]
Van wrote:
>
> Michael Meltzer wrote:
> >
> > thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
> > magazine, I got a copy of "interactive week" in sail mail today. (In my best
> I'd have never caught that but for the list. Thanks. Wonder what th
Van wrote:
>
> Michael Meltzer wrote:
> >
> > thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
> > magazine, I got a copy of "interactive week" in sail mail today. (In my best
> I'd have never caught that but for the list. Thanks. Wonder what the audience
> for that si
nce
for that site is. Also, was particularly intrigued by the "Portal out of the
Box" note. I thought Progress' only integration with MySQL was Gemini. Clearly
MySQL + Gemini != Portal. Hmmm!
I'm (probably?) not going anywhere with this, but, perhaps someone should order
t
>
> MYSQL.NET
> XMYSQL.COM
> MYSQLPHP.COM
> PHPMYSQL.COM
> MYSQL-PHP.COM
> MYSQLHOST.COM
>
> -S
>
>
Aside from being incorrect about the process of tradmarking in the
US and the ability to defend a trademark while awaiting registry,
all these above websites are not claiming to be the off
>
> I think you see evil people, conspiracies and other unwanted stuff when
> in fact there are only misunderstandings and opposing viewpoints.
>
> I'm with Bob Hall on this one. Excellent statement Bob!
>
> -S
>
>
Their is no conpsirisy, there is only one company trying to
steel
thought the list might want to know, this has been picked up by a trade
magazine, I got a copy of "interactive week" in sail mail today. (In my best
sarcastic voice)As they say in Hollywood "Any Publicity is good as long as
your spell the names right". Found a web version if any one wants a look.
ight next to the alien abduction story in the
National Enquirer.
Furthermore, their behavior secondary to this, and the proposition that they
opened the mysql.org site as a "Community" site flies right in the face
of the proposition forwarded by NuShpere that they opened the site with ful
of. What ticks us off is when our community is
threatened
by an organization posing to be the real thing. It's been a few months since I needed
to
visit the mysql web site. My heart dropped when I went to mysql.org and their was a new
site were I had always gone for mysql. Then they wanted me
At 21:28 01-07-19, you wrote:
> >
> > > the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
> > > as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
> > > themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
> > >
> >
> >
&g
Fact
MYSQL owns their trademark
Fact, what NuShpere brought form MYSQL is irrelevant as loing as they
are infrringing on the MYSQL Trademark...and they were going to do WORSE
until the public heat.
Until they apologies fo the GPL violation, and then the Trademark
infringment, they are pound sc
>
> > the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
> > as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
> > themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
> >
>
>
> Nah
>
> There using it as a marketing ploy to dup
Dear folks at NuSphere,
Thank you for your response to our open invitation. We disagree with a
number of your statements, but we look forward to having a phone contact
with you on Friday.
Marten Mickos
(database,sql,query,table)
--
> the same time, a NuSphere-controlled mysql.org doesn't strike me
> as a disaster, provided they can do it with out shooting
> themselves in the foot, as they are doing now.
>
Nah
There using it as a marketing ploy to dup the public.
The should have released their GP
g control of the mysql.org domain should be vehemently
> rejected by the MySQL community. No matter what agreement may or may
> not have been created, since MySQL AB has made it clear that this is
> not what they want or intended. So to me it is obvious that any
> agreement that may
First, I support mySQL and Open Source community. Maybe you can fight them
with their own weapon. They have made some extra applications based on
mySQL, and they sell it. You can create same applications as Open Source.
-
Befor
It seems to me that the bottom line is that any outcome that results
in there being a fork in the development of MySQL (with the result
being two completely different types of MySQL), or in NuSphere
retaining control of the mysql.org domain should be vehemently
rejected by the MySQL community
Werner is correct in encouraging all to make up your own mind.
And, it is always possible that Orwellian "DoubleSpeak" is an
ingredient of these public statements and posturing.
But, a great distinction must be made here, and not tie the
idea of "DoubleSpeak" to a fear of manipulation, unless
you
>As you are aware, we are forming a not-for-profit corporation to
>focus on building and supporting a larger MySQL development
>community and promoting MySQL. The mysql.org domain is expected
>to be transferred to that organization. NuSphere has taken the
>lead and is coveri
table
> This statement/release was very ordinary, very normal, very to-the-point
> for any situation such as this. Condescending, no. Condescension,
> like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.
Well, I didn't plan to give my opinion on this subject publicly.
But, I was alerted by the last pos
[permission to come aboard, sql database query table]
"Gerald R. Jensen" wrote:
>
> I wouldn't be concerned about this being discussed here on the list. After
> all, we are talking about Open Source.
>
> Gerald Jensen
-
Right, Mr. Jensen. My historical bent takes me further.
Britt:
I've read all of the posts regarding the controversy between MySQL AB and
NuSphere.
Not being a participant, I can't know all the details of your relationship
with MySQL AB, so I can only judge this in light of my own dealings with
them. Michael Widenius and David Axmark have always condu
t needed to
> establish the >further agreements that MySQL AB
> > seeks. We note that public statements have been made >after the
> invitation, statements that are not in the spirit of >the invitation.
>
> >Your willingness
> > to return to resolving our issues in a
t;Your willingness
> to return to resolving our issues in a business-like >fashion would be
> welcome.
- Original Message -
From: "Britt Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:59 PM
Su
show restraint and a spirit of cooperation in its
ongoing public statements.
As you are aware, we are forming a not-for-profit corporation to
focus on building and supporting a larger MySQL development
community and promoting MySQL. The mysql.org domain is expected
to be transferred to
http://www.nusphere.org
Is available to register but I don't now why you would what to ;o).?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 July 2001 10:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql.org (comments to old mes
or
MySAM. I'll program on the front. I love stability.
What is Gemini? And, what will it do for my clients that MySQL hasn't done for
the past 5 years using ISAM, or MySAM? Put that on the NuSphere.Org site
(whoops; mysql.org site). I don't care. My clients want stability and spe
their own reasons, Heikki Tuuri at Innobase got
interested in MySQL. His table handler, InnoDB, which has been
included in the MySQL source releases since 3.23.34, is an as
important contribution as Gemini.
Britt> As we said last January, we planned on Gemini being released
Britt> under an
Open Invitation to NuSphere and Progress
The people at MySQL AB would like to invite you, NuSphere Corporation
and Progress Software Corporation, to talks on neutral soil for the
purpose of resolving our disputes. We propose to meet on Wednesday 18
July 2001 and continue for as long as we need,
I hate to differ with you here, John... but please check the following URL
and notice the price tag on it --
http://www.redhat.com/products/software/linux/7-1_standard.html
RedHat is betting on, correctly so, that users in general will not spend
the time and effort to download over 100 meg of d
> >NuSphere's rights and motivations - we actually worked hard
> >to get the details in writing before we even started the
> >company and we paid real money. It is under this agreement
> >that we believe we have a clear right to use mysql.org.
See above. This right isn&#x
On Saturday, July 14, 2001, 9:25:51 PM, you wrote:
JN> GPL violation or not, part of my decisions are always based on
JN> morals (hard to find these days). Anyone trying to capture an
JN> audience using anothers name is un-ethical and un-moral. My
JN> business decision will be made with this i
> 1) While they do point out that they are not affliated, and
> provide a link to MySQL AB, they do not state why this is
> relevant, or why someone might WANT to go to MySQL AB.
Hmmm.. The NuSphere people may not be saying very much on
this list, but they're certainly listening in on what'
Well, I have gone and looked more closely at mysql.org.
I am forced to confess that I find several disheartening "features" at this
site. I am unwilling at this juncture to typify these issues as deliberate or
ill-intentioned, but I will say that NuSphere needs to make a
QL and NuSphere,
I'm sure it's just a mis-understanding, and it'll get sorted out amicably soon."
Then I actually went and looked at the mysql.org site.
Now I find I must strongly agree with what Andy Wooley wrote:
At 15:05 +0100 2001/07/15, Andy Woolley wrote:
>The impres
Just to clarify the U.S. trademark point raised here ...
The fact that it is in the mail, in progress, or whatever is really
immaterial.
It is not at all unusual for the formal application for trademarks, service
marks, patents, copyrights, etc. to come months or even years after the
product's i
wondering if there
> actually is a difference between MySQL and MySQL AB simply because mysql.org
> are implying such a fact. Their web site is also giving me the impression
> that they are responsible for the development of MySQL.I know Nusphere have
> given both time and money to the dev
ng a
product called MySQL, and that MySQL AB (found at mysql.com) is a different
product all together. This, is in my opinion is simply not on.
I have been using MySQL for many years and I am now wondering if there
actually is a difference between MySQL and MySQL AB simply because mysql.org
are imp
erpretation is that even under the interim
agreement,
> > the operation
> > by NuSphere of mysql.org would have been a trademark violation.
> Then, Marten, tell us what the status is of the trademark
> application?
> Under way, finished, or "in the mail" as sugge
t to MySQL.
>
> I think it is a fine distinction to
> say the (slight?) difference between mysql.com and mysql.org
> would lead to confusion. Are you confused by the extant
> "mysql.net"? What about xmysql.com? There have been arguments
> by both parties that these so
word probably quite often.. It's not always sure..
If I look at the mysql.org website it looks to me like I found the home of
MySQL. This is what most visitors which are unfamiliar with MySQL might or
will think. It's a very thin line.. I know..
If nushere want to provide the mysql community
BAUMEISTER Alexandre writes:
> Michael,
>
>
> It's years now that I use Mysql, post/read the mailing list, try to
> help you solving bugs, testing new features (like InnoDB currently).
>
> Why ? Because I really like Mysql, GPL licence and the way you work !
>
> What NuLsphere is doin
Reposting because of annoying filter.
On 15 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Your message cannot be posted because it appears to be either spam or
> simply off topic to our filter. To bypass the filter you must include
> one of the following words in your message:
>
> database,sql,query,tabl
Source???
> can someone from Nusphere explain it here
[== snip, snip ==]
Hassan:
I respectfully disagree with your suggestion that such a site
would spread confusion and give discredit to MySQL.
I think it is a fine distinction to
say the (slight?) difference between mysql.com and mysql.org
would
t must be really pleased with this stuff
At 01:25 15/07/01, Thomas J Keller wrote:
>Marten Mickos wrote:
> > In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
> > feel I have to come with the following comments.
> > (The quoted text marked with &
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Our interpretation is that even under the interim agreement,
> > the operation
> > by NuSphere of mysql.org would have been a trademar
hink that folks are discounting your efforts. In many cases,
> folks knew little of what NuSphere had really done to date.
>
> > The Gemini table handler itself is already part of MySQL and is
> > licensed under the GPL - go find ha_gemini.cc and you will see it we
&
's
> > PHPEd package (US$300 each) for our developers when I became aware of
the
> > controversy surrounding 'Enhanced MySQL' and mysql.org.
> >
> > The purchase order went into the round file, and Hell will freeze over
> > before I buy anything from NuSpher
> -Original Message-
> From: Marten Mickos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Our interpretation is that even under the interim agreement,
> the operation
> by NuSphere of mysql.org would have been a trademark violation.
Then, Marten, tell us what the status is o
ked with "> >" is by Britt Johnston)
> > >mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
> > >some time for it to become the thriving community it is destined
> > >to be. My hope is that rather than fighting it, you can join it
>
The more I think about this, the more convinced I am that someone needs to
offer the following observations:
It is unfortunate that so many people within this community are so eager to
assume the worst about a company, simply because they ARE a company. Not all
corporations are Mickey$lu$h (I
e fees that NuSphere is going to have
to pay to lawyers to defend themselves would basically a waste of money.
Is the .ORG domain worth that much to NuSphere?
4) It pisses off MySQL AB. Clearly it's in their best interest to be
friends with MySQL AB.
5) Although MySQLs pressrelease (on MySQL.
Marten Mickos wrote:
> In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
> feel I have to come with the following comments.
> (The quoted text marked with "> >" is by Britt Johnston)
> >mysql.org has not been publically announced and
In response to the posting by Thomas J Keller of Britt Johnston's text, I
feel I have to come with the following comments.
(The quoted text marked with ">" is by Britt Johnston)
>mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
>some time for it to becom
Alright. I have received Mr. Johnson's permission to share the email response
he made to me. it is included herewith for informational purposes without
comment or prejudice:
cut here ----
mysql.org has not been publically announced and it will take
some time for it to becom
Britt Johnston wrote:
>
> As far as mysql.org goes, what NuSphere would like to see is a
> non-profit organization running that site - we have been consistent
> in this desire for over a year, but it has been opposed by Monty
> and David. I discussed this with Monty as recently
Sorry for the last post with no response. In my anger, I hit reply by accident.
I usually resist the urge to flame publicly.
When I first posted about this topic I thought that the domain name
issue was the only transgression, I did not realize how deep it went.
Now I feel truly disgusted by the
that
the existence of ex-officio support sites for MySQL are
encouraged, not confusing, and good for all, but that
the mysql.org site is, technically, only a trademark
issue, in their eyes.
One has seen a convergence to the real nub, visible to
all of us interested observers, that the remedy for
to understand
>NuSphere's rights and motivations - we actually worked hard
>to get the details in writing before we even started the
>company and we paid real money. It is under this agreement
>that we believe we have a clear right to use mysql.org.
>
>Now it appears there is a
> Please consider these facts when you try to understand
Britt> NuSphere's rights and motivations - we actually worked hard to
Britt> get the details in writing before we even started the company
Britt> and we paid real money. It is under this agreement that we
Britt> believe we h
Michael,
MW> What NuSphere seems to be trying to do is to get people to approve
MW> of their fork, get more people to work on it, and cause confusion
MW> among MySQL users as to where the origin of the MySQL(tm) source
MW> and documentation is. What NuSphere has done indicates that they
MW>
Justin,
I very much agree with your compliment to Jeremy for his posting.
Some notes on your posting follow.
At 14/07/01 14:03 +0200, Justin wrote:
>Personally, I could care less about the mysql.org
>domain issue. I, more or less, see it just as another
>kind of ex-officio site s
Colin Faber writes:
> Michael, Interesting idea but I think it would problematic over all,
> The mysql manual changes almost everyday (anyone that syncs the bk
> tree's knows) I would suggest a better solution would be to provide the
> manual as a localized application (possibly even ported to
ose common socialogical phenomena,
the perception that sombody or a Company is somehow
exploiting Open Source with its train of reactions:
- NuSphere is a dirty bunch of guys
- Monty is being screwed
- et cetera ad infinitum
Personally, I could care less about the mysql.org
domain issue. I, more
f is already part of MySQL and is
> licensed under the GPL - go find ha_gemini.cc and you will see it we
> checked it in long ago in V4 and again in 3.23 when V4 was late.
> The Gemini component itself will be released via mysql.org as GPL as
> previously announced - note that Gemini itsel
re we even started the
company and we paid real money. It is under this agreement
that we believe we have a clear right to use mysql.org.
Now it appears there is a need by MySQL AB to characterize
that agreement as no longer in effect - I hope you can respect
the fact that NuSphere believes it i
Colin Faber wrote:
> Michael, Interesting idea but I think it would problematic over all,
> The mysql manual changes almost everyday (anyone that syncs the bk
> tree's knows) I would suggest a better solution would be to provide the
> manual as a localized application (possibly even ported to
At 9:15 PM -0600 7/13/01, Colin Faber wrote:
>Michael, Interesting idea but I think it would problematic over all,
>The mysql manual changes almost everyday (anyone that syncs the bk
>tree's knows) I would suggest a better solution would be to provide the
> manual as a localized application (poss
Michael, Interesting idea but I think it would problematic over all,
The mysql manual changes almost everyday (anyone that syncs the bk
tree's knows) I would suggest a better solution would be to provide the
manual as a localized application (possibly even ported to
PalmOS/WindowsCE), Anyone?
At 8:09 PM -0400 7/13/01, Mark A. Chalkley wrote:
>I, for one, was
>considering purchase of their distribution just to get the printed
>manuals, but wouldn't have one from them now if they were giving them
>away.
BTW, why doesn't MySQL AB print the manual and sell it? I would
gladly pay US $ 30-
On Friday, July 13, 2001, 8:02:16 PM, you wrote:
MW> MySQL is GPL, so it's ok to sell derivate works. The problem is
MW> however that NuSphere has been selling derivate work but not complied
MW> to the GPL license, which is NOT ok.
MW> By using mysql.org they are also violat
database,sql,query,table
>
> Now most of us in/using Open Source probably do not _really_
> understand the meaning and ramifications of the GPL. We _think_
> we know, and we certainly have a "feeling" about what the GPL
> "means".
Oh Bull
Making a derived work from a GPL produc
"Michael Widenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By using mysql.org they are also violating our trademark; If we are
> not defending our trademark we may loose it.
I'm sure you and your attorneys have considered this, but for the benefit of
others on the list I'll
-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:36:08 -0700
>
>I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
>NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
>with MySQL AB's busines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
> NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
> with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deployments of the
> package? And by that I can somewhat see wh
elling derivate work but not complied
to the GPL license, which is NOT ok.
By using mysql.org they are also violating our trademark; If we are
not defending our trademark we may loose it.
If they would have released the server and all source code as NuSphere
SQL on 'www.nusphere.com', we a
I am far from a legal expert on this... but is it all that bad that
NuSphere wishes to sell a derivative work of MySQL? Other than it competes
with MySQL AB's business of selling their own commercial deployments of the
package? And by that I can somewhat see why NuSphere is using the phrase
"un
> Hi!
>
>
>
> Sander> I do not deny their claim on the trademark OR domain,
> but I am
> Sander> somewhat unpleasantly surprised by the means they try
> to resolve
> Sander> this matter, and the fact that nobody in a what I
> assume is an
> Sander> internet-aware company like MySQL even
Well.
It should be an interesting Open Source convention in
San Diego later this month...
database,sql,query,table
--
Paul DuBois, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (
; large american corporations like MS. I never expected MySQL AB to
>> come out so hostile and brutal as they did.
Jeremy> Who told you that they ignored that "rule"?
mysql.org was acquired a long time ago by some friendly MySQL users
that pointed it to mysql.com; Due to circumstance
ing the .org and .net before others did.
See my previous letter; We did everything in our power to resolve this
in a friendly manner but didn't succeed in this.
We didn't own mysql.net and mysql.org ourselves, but both of these
where owned by friends of ours.
You have also to remember
Hi!
> "Tim" == Tim Endres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If anyone has any comments about how we at MySQL AB work as an open
>> source company, please write to our CEO Marten Mickos via
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we will welcome your suggestions. We are
>> totally dependent on the trust of ou
Hi,
>
>The article mentions that the Web site will confuse new users, but I
>think this one will confuse them even more:
>http://mysql.net/
>(for non-Japanese users that is).
Korean, actually.
--
Matthias Urlichs (being exceedingly helpful today)
--
Farnsworth
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Gerald R. Jensen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mysql.org
"Gerald R. Jensen" wrote:
>
> Monty:
>
> I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
"Gerald R. Jensen" wrote:
>
> Monty:
>
> I was on the verge of authorizing the purchase of 3 copies of NuSphere's
> PHPEd package (US$300 each) for our developers when I became aware of the
> controversy surrounding 'Enhanced MySQL' and mysql.org.
nomebiology.com/
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerry Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:15 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
