Re: [newbie] windows-mandrake

2005-02-23 Thread John Layt
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:14, Gica Strimbu wrote: > Does anybody know how to run a windows program in mandrake 9.2. Is an > emulator or something for this ? I need to run a small program for decoding > a tv card and i don't have a linux version. thanks You just want to view normal, un-encrypted TV fr

Re: [newbie] windows-mandrake

2005-02-22 Thread Gica Strimbu
Thank you - Original Message - From: "Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 7:24 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] windows-mandrake On Wednesday 23 February 2005 03:14 am, Gica Strimbu wrote: Does anybody know how to run a windows program in

Re: [newbie] windows-mandrake

2005-02-22 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 03:14 am, Gica Strimbu wrote: > Does anybody know how to run a windows program in mandrake 9.2. Is an > emulator or something for this ? I need to run a small program for decoding > a tv card and i don't have a linux version. thanks You could try Wine or Transgamings'

[newbie] windows-mandrake

2005-02-22 Thread Gica Strimbu
Does anybody know how to run a windows program in mandrake 9.2. Is an emulator or something for this ? I need to run a small program for decoding a tv card and i don't have a linux version. thanks

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread rikona
Hello Kaj, Thursday, December 2, 2004, 3:42:07 PM, Kaj wrote: KH> On Friday 03 December 2004 00:27, rikona wrote: >> KH> Agreed. At last Microsoft did something good. >> >> I'd have to disagree. It is a rather large invasion of privacy, >> which is a larger topic, but we should move this to

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Friday 03 December 2004 00:27, rikona wrote: > Hello Kaj, > > Thursday, December 2, 2004, 3:03:04 PM, Kaj wrote: > > KH> On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:45, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > KH> > > >> Keeping Windows off the net is much better. I'm surprised how > >> little uproar (actually total silenc

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread rikona
Hello Kaj, Thursday, December 2, 2004, 3:03:04 PM, Kaj wrote: KH> On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:45, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: KH> >> Keeping Windows off the net is much better. I'm surprised how >> little uproar (actually total silence) there was here in the >> Netherlands when they rounded up a bu

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread rikona
Hello H.J.Bathoorn, Thursday, December 2, 2004, 2:45:12 PM, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: HJB> Downside is that calypso has a strange way of compressing it's HJB> backups..if it realy crashes there's hardly a way to salvage HJB> old mail archives. Oooo - wouldn't touch that one, I'm afraid. Got burned

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Friday 03 December 2004 00:03, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > > > Agreed.  At last Microsoft did something good. > > Kaj Haulrich. Actually I'm not all together thrilled at the idea. A large multinational enterprise (with a very stained legal and moral reputation) has more information than nation

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:45, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > Keeping Windows off the net is much better. I'm surprised how > little uproar (actually total silence) there was here in the > Netherlands when they rounded up a bunch of alleged Islamic > terrorists who had threatened a right wing politic

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 02 December 2004 23:14, rikona wrote: > Hello H.J.Bathoorn, > > Thursday, December 2, 2004, 12:49:07 PM, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > HJB> On Thursday 02 December 2004 21:30, Simon Roberts wrote: > >> These things will, by default, download and execute various things > >> you probably didn't

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread rikona
Hello H.J.Bathoorn, Thursday, December 2, 2004, 12:49:07 PM, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: HJB> On Thursday 02 December 2004 21:30, Simon Roberts wrote: >> These things will, by default, download and execute various things >> you probably didn't want. This is compounded by the average user's >> response to

Re: [newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Thursday 02 December 2004 21:30, Simon Roberts wrote: > > From: "H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ... > > > On Thursday 02 December 2004 10:26, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > > > Maybe I'm paranoid, but after that experience we don't allow her > > > Windows box contact with anything outside her room

[newbie] Windows "Security"

2004-12-02 Thread Simon Roberts
> From: "H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... > On Thursday 02 December 2004 10:26, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > > Maybe I'm paranoid, but after that experience we don't allow her > > Windows box contact with anything outside her room. > You are;) Confined to the LAN can't really hurt can it, especially

[newbie] windows - linux authentication

2004-11-30 Thread Jan Rubbrecht
Hi, I have a mandrake 9.1 installed, and currently the system is configured that authentication happens against the /etc/passwd file on the local system. My linux pc is partly used as a fileserver for a couple windows XP & 2K boxes that are in a WORKGROUP, no NT Domain. On all computers, the sam

Re: [newbie] Windows/Linux file transfers

2004-08-26 Thread Lanman
Peter, replies are inline with your text: Peter Davis wrote: I have a home network with two Windows XP systems and one Mandrake 10.0. (Wrong proportions, I know.) The Mandrake system is new, and I'm trying to figure out how I can get file sharing to work across systems. I can't seem to see a Win

Re: [newbie] Windows/Linux file transfers

2004-08-26 Thread Piotr Antczak
Dnia czw 26. sierpnia 2004 14:45, Peter Davis napisał: > I have a home network with two Windows XP systems and one Mandrake > 10.0. (Wrong proportions, I know.) The Mandrake system is new, and I'm > trying to figure out how I can get file sharing to work across systems. > I can't seem to see a W

Re: [newbie] Windows XP 2 - already broke

2004-08-20 Thread JoeHill
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:44:51 +0300 PM disseminated the following: > Couldn't really make it up could you? > > A year late, billions of dollars, out less than 24 hours, and now: > > http://secunia.com/advisories/12321 > > Advise your friends running XP sp2 to turn off Active Scripting. I like t

[newbie] Windows XP 2 - already broke

2004-08-20 Thread PM
Couldn't really make it up could you? A year late, billions of dollars, out less than 24 hours, and now: http://secunia.com/advisories/12321 Advise your friends running XP sp2 to turn off Active Scripting. -- pm ___ I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my e

Re: [newbie] Windows boot disk

2004-06-18 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
Mark Annandale wrote: Hi Guys I'm trying to have a play with vmware but need to create a windows boot disk to load XP. Unfortunately I don't have a windows system to create this boot disk on. Can anyone tell me how tp create one using mandrake 10. Before anyone asks, my wifes a bean counter and

Re: [newbie] Windows boot disk

2004-06-18 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 00:20, Mark Annandale wrote: > Hi Guys > > I'm trying to have a play with vmware but need to create a windows boot disk > to load XP. Unfortunately I don't have a windows system to create this boot > disk on. > > Can anyone tell me how tp create one using mandrake 10. > >

[newbie] Windows boot disk

2004-06-18 Thread Mark Annandale
Hi Guys I'm trying to have a play with vmware but need to create a windows boot disk to load XP. Unfortunately I don't have a windows system to create this boot disk on. Can anyone tell me how tp create one using mandrake 10. Before anyone asks, my wifes a bean counter and to get her to use th

RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10

2004-05-28 Thread Yves Arsenault
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn Sent: May 28, 2004 3:09 PM To: Mandrake Newbie Subject: RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10 On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 03:53, Yves Arsenault wrote: > Thank you very much Stephen. > &

RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10

2004-05-28 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 03:53, Yves Arsenault wrote: > Thank you very much Stephen. > > The adventure begins. > > :-) > > YVes Yves, I think you'll have fun once you realise how simple it really is; Samba is truly a saviour in as much as it can not only emulate an NT domain but control one bette

RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10

2004-05-28 Thread Yves Arsenault
Thank you very much Stephen. The adventure begins. :-) YVes -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn Sent: May 28, 2004 2:48 PM To: Mandrake Newbie Subject: RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10 On Fri, 2004-05-28 at

RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10

2004-05-28 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 21:11, Yves Arsenault wrote: > Sure, that would probably be helpful. > > Thanks, > > Yves Bear in mind that you're going to have to create a group - for users that use this machine or have accounts on this machine - and sync them with the windows users. It ain't really tha

RE: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10

2004-05-28 Thread Yves Arsenault
Sure, that would probably be helpful. Thanks, Yves -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn Sent: May 27, 2004 5:21 PM To: Mandrake Newbie Subject: Re: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10 On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 21:53

Re: [newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10

2004-05-27 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 21:53, Yves Arsenault wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if it was possible to run a Mandrake 10 server as a windows > type domain controller for a local network? > > Yves Not that version matters, but my system here, a MDK 9.1+ setup with Samba 2.2.8a is an NT domain cont

[newbie] Windows type domain with Mandrake 10

2004-05-27 Thread Yves Arsenault
Hello, I was wondering if it was possible to run a Mandrake 10 server as a windows type domain controller for a local network? Yves Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http

Re: [newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-27 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 12:41, Dennis Myers wrote: > On Tuesday 27 April 2004 05:14 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 20:07, Frank wrote: > > > Good call Tina. > > > > ...ya ain't allowed to agree with her! (grin) > > (...reckon I'll sleep on the lounge tonight) > > > > stephen kuhn -

Re: [newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-27 Thread Dennis Myers
On Tuesday 27 April 2004 05:14 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 20:07, Frank wrote: > > Good call Tina. > > ...ya ain't allowed to agree with her! (grin) > (...reckon I'll sleep on the lounge tonight) > > stephen kuhn - owner I thought we were not supposed to agree with Joe! You can'

Re: [newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-27 Thread JRH
On Tuesday 27 Apr 2004 19:51, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > So now you should be able to point lilo to the /dev/hda1 and boot - have > you tried that now? Not yet. havent had chance! Just been setting up a Lexmark (spit) printer on my neighbours Windows (spit) computer. Once I have had a coffee and

Re: [newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-27 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 01:55, JRH wrote: > On Tuesday 27 Apr 2004 09:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > > Er...I think we've been through this already (day late and a dollar > > short) NYAH! > > I rolled over and took it like a Man in the end > > I reinstalled, and whilst I was at it, set aside 3GB

Re: [newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-27 Thread JRH
On Tuesday 27 Apr 2004 09:43, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > Er...I think we've been through this already (day late and a dollar > short) NYAH! I rolled over and took it like a Man in the end I reinstalled, and whilst I was at it, set aside 3GB as FAT32, and reloaded '98 on my main drive. It's th

Re: [newbie] Windows and LiLo

2004-04-25 Thread Marco Terzuoli
Alle 14:35, domenica 25 aprile 2004, Stephen Kuhn ha scritto: try this as well: other=/dev/hdd1 label="windows" > On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 22:21, JRH wrote: > > Stephen, > > > > Did as you suggested, and still no joy! > > > > I select windows at the lilo screen, and it just hangs there now..

Re: [newbie] Windows and LiLo

2004-04-25 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 22:21, JRH wrote: > Stephen, > > Did as you suggested, and still no joy! > > I select windows at the lilo screen, and it just hangs there now have > to use the reset switch to get it back again. > > I have pasted my lilo.conf file contents below. Doubtless to say,

[newbie] Windows and LiLo

2004-04-25 Thread JRH
Stephen, Did as you suggested, and still no joy! I select windows at the lilo screen, and it just hangs there now have to use the reset switch to get it back again. I have pasted my lilo.conf file contents below. Doubtless to say, I'm doing something wrong here... but what?? :-) Feel

Re: [newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-25 Thread JRH
On Sunday 25 Apr 2004 12:28, Stephen Kuhn wrote:> > JRH > > After you edited the /etc/lilo.conf - did you re-run lilo? > Ahh hold up Stephen. I used the GUI tool to alter things. looks like it hasnt saved it! I've noticed it has a habit of doing stuff like that, for example, when I c

Re: [newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-25 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 21:06, JRH wrote: > Hi all. > > Until a week ago, Windows used to share my HDD alongside Linux. > > Then, last weekend, MS-DOS decided it was going to ruin my Linux install (with > a little help from me inadvertently I guess!). I have tried to survive > without a Windows p

[newbie] Windows & LiLo

2004-04-25 Thread JRH
Hi all. Until a week ago, Windows used to share my HDD alongside Linux. Then, last weekend, MS-DOS decided it was going to ruin my Linux install (with a little help from me inadvertently I guess!). I have tried to survive without a Windows partition, but In reality, I cant. I have loaded up 98

Re: [newbie] Windows Remoting X'ing

2004-04-14 Thread H.J.Bathoorn
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 01:36, jeb wrote: > Ok, then..How do I do it linux to linux? > If you're using Mandrake: Just "ssh", Mdk has X forwarding enabled by default. Otherwise you need the X flag, thus: "ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]" You cannot get the whole interface to run remotely (VNC does that wel

Re: [newbie] Windows Remoting X'ing

2004-04-13 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:36, jeb wrote: > Ok, then..How do I do it linux to linux? SSH. (That is, if you're using the same version/distro) stephen kuhn - owner == illawarra computer services a kuhn media australia company http://kma.0catch.com

Re: [newbie] Windows Remoting X'ing

2004-04-13 Thread jeb
Ok, then..How do I do it linux to linux? Stephen Kuhn wrote: On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:01, jeb wrote: I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my windows box? I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I am running putty with x11 forwardin

Re: [newbie] Windows Remoting X'ing

2004-04-13 Thread Guy Rouillier
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 18:01:48 -0500 jeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my > > windows box? cygwin with XFree86 > > I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I > > am running putty with x11 forwardin

Re: [newbie] Windows Remoting X'ing

2004-04-13 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:01, jeb wrote: > I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my > windows box? > > I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I > am running putty with x11 forwarding on. However, I login fine but when > I launch x as a

[newbie] Windows Remoting X'ing

2004-04-13 Thread jeb
I have a question for the list, what do I need to send x via ssh to my windows box? I have a Mandrake 10 server running ssh and x, on my windows xp box, I am running putty with x11 forwarding on. However, I login fine but when I launch x as a normal user I get : [EMAIL PROTECTED] jebba]$ star

Re: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen

2004-03-27 Thread Tom Brinkman
ring a Mandrake install. The problem with MMove, is that unless you use the CD along with a USB storage device, your changes will be lost when you quit MMove. > -Original Message- > From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:57 AM > To:

RE: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen

2004-03-27 Thread Beavers, Randy W.
I'am having the same problem with Mandrake Move can't change the screen resolution. -Original Message- From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 11:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen Dear

Re: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen

2004-03-24 Thread Frank Bax
At 11:57 AM 3/24/04, Paul Smith wrote: Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty? 1) Buy a bigger monitor 2) Change resolution 3) Memorise how many times you need to hit tab key to get to 'OK' button

Re: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen

2004-03-24 Thread bmobile40
Set your screen resolution to a higher DPI. I recommend 1024 X 768. That should fix the problem. Jim On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 10:57, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All > > Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with > accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this di

Re: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen

2004-03-24 Thread Todd Slater
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 04:57:15PM +, Paul Smith wrote: > Dear All > > Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with > accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty? > > Thank you a lot in advance! It probably depends on your window manager, bu

Re: [newbie] Windows bigger than the screen

2004-03-24 Thread frankieh
Paul Smith wrote: Dear All Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty? Thank you a lot in advance! Paul Hold down the ALT key and drag the window so you can access the buttons.. -- rgds Frank Haupt

[newbie] Windows bigger than the screen

2004-03-24 Thread Paul Smith
Dear All Some windows are bigger than the screen, what causes problems with accessing the OK button. Is there any trick to overcome this difficulty? Thank you a lot in advance! Paul Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go t

[newbie] Windows Services For Unix--free

2004-01-14 Thread Miark
Used to be $99 and is now free. Shock of shocks. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/14/1738230 Miark Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] windows network connected

2003-12-03 Thread cdrack
just a thing... the linux secure option from the boot loader means some thing like on windows fail proof mode... where you have running only the escential services and is used to fix some thing that doesnt work... like video settings or services that hang the system. the secure option doesn't me

[newbie] windows network connected

2003-12-03 Thread Chris Savchick
Thanks for the replies. I have my linux PC successfully connected to my network with internet access now. I think I was selecting "linux-secure" from the bootloader instead of "linux." That locks everything down doesn't it? If so, that was my problem. Now on to Samba! Chris Want to buy your

Re: [newbie] windows networking

2003-12-03 Thread Anne Wilson
On Wednesday 03 Dec 2003 3:35 pm, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > To set up a file server for windows machines you need to install > the samba server package - it's on your MDK installation disks, use > Software Package Management from Mandrake Control Center. To > configure samba server you should read

Re: [newbie] windows networking

2003-12-03 Thread Raffaele Belardi
To set up a file server for windows machines you need to install the samba server package - it's on your MDK installation disks, use Software Package Management from Mandrake Control Center. To configure samba server you should read the Samba-HOWTO, just to know what you're doing. To check if t

Re: [newbie] windows networking

2003-12-03 Thread cdrack
Hi, on my prior Mandrake sistems (9.1,9.0,8) if you whant to use the DHCP option, you must have a HDCP server that provides you the control of the addresses over youre net. So if you don't have it, the easyest thing you can do is use the static ip address assigned by youre selfe. For using th

[newbie] windows networking

2003-12-03 Thread Chris Savchick
I have Mandrake Linux 9.2 up and running on a PC I hope to use as a file server. I have two additional PCs running Windows 98SE in a peer-to-peer network configuration. One of them also supplies an ADSL connection to all PCs in my network (I used to have 3 running 98). The ADSL PC runs WinRoute

Re: Re[2]: [newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread ed tharp
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 14:41, rikona wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Thursday, October 9, 2003, 8:37:48 AM, you wrote: > > > TB> I can only wonder if I might have showed up in SBC's logs as > TB> receiving infected email from Winsux users. > > Perhaps someone spoofed your address and SBC doesn't know/c

Re: Re[2]: [newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday October 9 2003 01:41 pm, rikona wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Thursday, October 9, 2003, 8:37:48 AM, you wrote: > > > TB> I can only wonder if I might have showed up in SBC's logs as > TB> receiving infected email from Winsux users. > > Perhaps someone spoofed your address and SBC doesn't kn

Re[2]: [newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread rikona
Hello Tom, Thursday, October 9, 2003, 8:37:48 AM, you wrote: TB> I can only wonder if I might have showed up in SBC's logs as TB> receiving infected email from Winsux users. Perhaps someone spoofed your address and SBC doesn't know/care who really sent it. -- rikona

Re: [newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:08:15 -0400 HaywireMac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The recent report by the CCIA gave us an academic viewpoint as to > why Windows is a blight on the Internet. > > This article provides a concrete example as to why Windows > machines should be disconnected from the Inter

Re: [newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread HaywireMac
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:37:48 -0500 Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > Still if I showed up to them as a false positive, I can only > wonder how many infected Winblows users they miss detecting. OTOH, > disconnecting many Winsuz users, even just the infected ones, would > put any ISP

Re: [newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread Eric Huff
> Specially since a > lot of Windoze users refuse to believe they're infected, or do > anything about it even if they are. Usual response is "I'm not > havin any problems. Besides I have a virus checker and use Zone > Alarm." If microsoft was smart, they would, upon discovering these security hole

Re: [newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Thursday October 9 2003 08:08 am, HaywireMac wrote: > The recent report by the CCIA gave us an academic viewpoint as to > why Windows is a blight on the Internet. > > This article provides a concrete example as to why Windows > machines should be disconnected from the Internet, quarantined, > an

[newbie] Windows Must be Stopped

2003-10-09 Thread HaywireMac
The recent report by the CCIA gave us an academic viewpoint as to why Windows is a blight on the Internet. This article provides a concrete example as to why Windows machines should be disconnected from the Internet, quarantined, and otherwise shut out, wherever possible, until MS decides to take

[newbie] Windows vs. Virus'

2003-10-09 Thread HaywireMac
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article09-115 Is Windows a Virus? No, Windows is not a virus. Here's what viruses do: * They replicate quickly - okay, Windows does that. * Viruses use up valuable system resources, slowing down the system as they do so - okay, Windows does that.

Re: [newbie] Windows version of Konqueror and Kmail.

2003-09-22 Thread Angus Auld
- Original Message - From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [newbie] Windows version of Konqueror and Kmail. > Hi, > > Is there a windows version of Konqueror or Kmail? > > I am dual booting and I want the same browser and mail progra

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Dennis Myers
On Thursday 31 July 2003 06:21 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 05:03, Dennis Myers wrote: > > http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm > > The above is a Govt. warning on Internet attacks on Windows systems. I > > don't know a great deal about that kind of

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Aron Smith
On Thursday 31 July 2003 02:55 pm, Dennis Myers wrote: > On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > > Haywiremac wrote: > > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500 > > > > > >Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > > >>http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 05:03, Dennis Myers wrote: > http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm > The above is a Govt. warning on Internet attacks on Windows systems. I don't > know a great deal about that kind of attack, so if I have the windows machine > behind a router an

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Dennis Myers
On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > Haywiremac wrote: > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500 > > > >Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > >>http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm > > > >didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar dea

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
Dennis Myers wrote: On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: Haywiremac wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500 Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm didn't the DHS *just sign* a mul

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Aron Smith
On Thursday 31 July 2003 02:12 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: > Haywiremac wrote: > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500 > > > >Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > >>http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm > > > >didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar dea

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
Haywiremac wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500 Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar deal with MS? I believe they did. Another demonstration that *only* the *be

[newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Dennis Myers
http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm The above is a Govt. warning on Internet attacks on Windows systems. I don't know a great deal about that kind of attack, so if I have the windows machine behind a router and a linux firewall will this afford some protection again

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Haywiremac
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500 Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uttered: > http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/advisories/2003/Potential7302003.htm didn't the DHS *just sign* a multi-gazillion dollar deal with MS? -- HaywireMac If you would know the value of money, go try to borrow some.

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Dennis Myers
On Thursday 31 July 2003 02:45 pm, Miark wrote: > Dennis, > > As a rule of thumb, if your firewall is running NAT (and they usually > do) and you're not forwarding ports to Windows machines on your side of > the wall, then you're safe from outside-in attacks. > > Miark > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03

Re: [newbie] Windows vulnerable again

2003-07-31 Thread Miark
Dennis, As a rule of thumb, if your firewall is running NAT (and they usually do) and you're not forwarding ports to Windows machines on your side of the wall, then you're safe from outside-in attacks. Miark On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:03:09 -0500, Dennis Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-22 Thread et
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:51 pm, Frank Bax wrote: > At 12:49 AM 3/22/03, David E. Fox wrote: > > > That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I tried to=20 > > > become root and change the permissions by issuing the=20 > > > command : chmod 777 * . > > > >That's because FAT32 doesn't imple

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-22 Thread Frank Bax
At 12:49 AM 3/22/03, David E. Fox wrote: > That - of course - triggered my filthy phantasy. I tried to=20 > become root and change the permissions by issuing the=20 > command : chmod 777 * . That's because FAT32 doesn't implement permissions the same way - so a chmod wouldn't have any effect, and

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 22 Mar 2003 9:51 am, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > On Saturday 22 March 2003 10:30 am, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Friday 21 Mar 2003 11:31 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > > > On Friday 21 March 2003 11:38 pm, Francisco Alcaraz > Anne, when I edited fstab to include umask=0 0 0 the problem > went away

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:44 am, et wrote: > On Friday 21 March 2003 05:08 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > > Hi all... > > > > For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had > > no security at all. Until today. > > > > But first things first : I don't have Windows on my > > box. In no way, mann

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Saturday 22 March 2003 12:09 am, Miark wrote: > Kaj, > > You can't change permisions on VFAT filesystems from the > commandline. You have to specify it at mount time. Make > sure your fstab entries have "umask=0 0 0". > > Miark > Thanks Miark - that did the trick ! Kaj Haulrich. -- Registered

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread et
On Friday 21 March 2003 05:08 pm, Kaj Haulrich wrote: > Hi all... > > For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had no > security at all. Until today. > > But first things first : I don't have Windows on my box. In > no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake 9.0. > > Well, a modification

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Friday 21 March 2003 11:38 pm, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote: > Kaj, > > Try to pass an scandisk to your windows partition, I had > a similar problem long times ago due to disk-error; > mandrake couldn't write in the partition but after pass > an scandisk windows detected several errors and rep

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Miark
Kaj, You can't change permisions on VFAT filesystems from the commandline. You have to specify it at mount time. Make sure your fstab entries have "umask=0 0 0". Miark On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:08:02 +0100 Kaj Haulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all... > > For the last 7 years or so I th

Re: [newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Kaj, Try to pass an scandisk to your windows partition, I had a similar problem long times ago due to disk-error; mandrake couldn't write in the partition but after pass an scandisk windows detected several errors and repaired it. Until that moment mandrake could again write on the windows pa

[newbie] Windows more secure than Linux

2003-03-21 Thread Kaj Haulrich
Hi all... For the last 7 years or so I thought that Windows had no security at all. Until today. But first things first : I don't have Windows on my box. In no way, manner, shape or form. Only Mandrake 9.0. Well, a modification is needed here : My box is set up with 4 users : My ever-beloved

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 09:04, civileme wrote: > That should have been "prior to W2K". I have not had any reports of lost > partitions involving W2K (NT5) or XP (NT5.1), but it happens with 95 (all > releases) 98, 98SE and ME and NT <= 4.xx > > Civileme > I've just bore witness to XP rewriting

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread civileme
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 03:35 am, Adolfo Bello wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 08:20, et wrote: > > I KNOW that there are 3rd party utilities to allow win2k/xp to use EXT2 > > filesystems, but I would not trust them as much as I trust linus on any > > filesystem, and sure would HATE to loose import

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread Raffaele Belardi
Yes: "Linux Partition HOWTO" "Partition-Rescue HOWTO" In one of the two (I think the first one) you'll find a rationale behind the choice of a /boot partition. Both are available from the Linux Documentation Project web site. Print and keep handy! :-) raffaele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adolfo B

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2003 2:51 pm, Brian wrote: > Adolfo Bello wrote: > I have been considering purchasing the o'Reilly book "Running Linux" > does anyone have any feedback on this book, or another good book for > getting started with Linux? Again, I know how to use a computer quite > well, so i am l

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread Brian
Adolfo Bello wrote: That's right, NTFS support is read-only. I was in the same situation you are right now four months ago. Right now I rarely use XP (only when I need to login to some clients Windows domain or to open old Access files). My setup is as follow: 1.- A 10 GB NTFS for XP. 2.- A 1 GB

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread Brian
Greg Meyer wrote: On Monday 10 March 2003 02:12 pm, Brian wrote: Why are you so insistant on ntfs? The security aspects get blown out the door by installing Linux, so I cannot imagine that the speed is that much better to make it a requirement. Greg, Again, I am looking to continue to use Wi

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread Brian
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 08:38 am, Adolfo Bello wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:30, et wrote: > > this is correct, however I believe Civileme is refering to the boot-up > > record, not the ability to see and read files. > > I have WINme, Mandrake 9.0 and WIN2K installed all over my drives here i

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread et
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 08:38 am, Adolfo Bello wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:30, et wrote: > > this is correct, however I believe Civileme is refering to the boot-up > > record, not the ability to see and read files. > > I have WINme, Mandrake 9.0 and WIN2K installed all over my drives here is

Re: [newbie] Windows XP and Mandrake 9.0 - Dual Boot

2003-03-11 Thread Adolfo Bello
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:30, et wrote: > > this is correct, however I believe Civileme is refering to the boot-up record, > not the ability to see and read files. > I have WINme, Mandrake 9.0 and WIN2K installed all over my drives here is what > # df says; > Filesystem 1K-blocks

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >