Hi All
I've noticed that since using external hardware mouse in Mandrake 10.1 that I
don't have a problem with disconnections from server all the time, or
difficulty logging on in the first place, which was happening frequently
before. I don't know whether it is being in linux, the modem, or
Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
Hi All
I've noticed that since using external hardware mouse in Mandrake 10.1 that I
don't have a problem with disconnections from server all the time, or
difficulty logging on in the first place, which was happening frequently
before. I don't know whether
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:18, mike wrote:
Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
Hi All
I've noticed that since using external hardware mouse in Mandrake 10.1
that I don't have a problem with disconnections from server all the time,
or difficulty logging on in the first place, which was happening
On Sunday 20 February 2005 07:36 pm, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:18, mike wrote:
Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
Hi All
I've noticed that since using external hardware mouse in Mandrake 10.1
that I don't have a problem with disconnections from server all the
Morning / Afternoon and evening everyone.
I just wanted to ask, my play machine at home, at the moment runs as a dual
booting system, with both windows XP Pro and MDK 10.0 Community, now it was
running fine up untill last night, I bought a processor and GFX card for the
machine, now when I put
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc Hultquist
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] OT: Hardware Issues
Morning / Afternoon and evening everyone.
I just wanted to ask, my play machine
On Sunday 04 July 2004 11:44 pm, Marek Pawinski wrote:
-Hi
-
-I had a problem where one of my machines would reboot every 8 days or so.
-Now it reboots every few hours. The CPU fan seems to be working every time
-i look. I tried knoppix on it as well so its not the OS looks like it. Not
-being
Hi
I had a problem where one of my machines would reboot every 8 days or so.
Now it reboots every few hours. The CPU fan seems to be working every time
i look. I tried knoppix on it as well so its not the OS looks like it. Not
being much of a hardware man i wonder if anyone knows what could
Marek Pawinski wrote:
Hi
I had a problem where one of my machines would reboot every 8 days or
so. Now it reboots every few hours. The CPU fan seems to be working
every time i look. I tried knoppix on it as well so its not the OS
looks like it. Not being much of a hardware man i wonder if
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 13:44, Marek Pawinski wrote:
Hi
I had a problem where one of my machines would reboot every 8 days or so.
Now it reboots every few hours. The CPU fan seems to be working every time
i look. I tried knoppix on it as well so its not the OS looks like it. Not
being
On Sunday 04 July 2004 10:44 pm, Marek Pawinski wrote:
Hi
I had a problem where one of my machines would reboot every 8 days or so.
Now it reboots every few hours. The CPU fan seems to be working every time
i look. I tried knoppix on it as well so its not the OS looks like it. Not
being much
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:58:35 -0500
Mikkel L. Ellertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dumb question time - Are the connectors on that cable labeled for
where they should be plugged in? (Motherboard, drive 0, drive 1) If
so, are you plugging things in the correct place? You may also have
to try
C. Tresenriter wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:58:35 -0500 Mikkel L. Ellertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dumb question time - Are the connectors on that cable labeled for
where they should be plugged in? (Motherboard, drive 0, drive 1)
If so, are you plugging things in the correct place? You may
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:56:13 -0500
Mikkel L. Ellertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I were you, I would try changing to cable select, and see if that
fixes the problem. I know that one setup I have does not work right
when useing the cable select cable, and jumpering as master, or slave.
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:57:08 -0500
C. Tresenriter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that seems to have solved the issue, it's booting from the
primary channel, master position on the cable.
Guess I'll leave well enough alone.
Appears I spoke too soon.
Once I put the CD/DVD back on the cable I
I'm trying to determine if my hard disk is bad or if the problem is
motherboard related or something else entirely.
When booting 10. CE, after running POST, I occasionally get:
Disk boot failure: Insert systems disk and press enter to continue
Yesterday I received a replacement mobo from ASUS,
C. Tresenriter wrote:
I'm trying to determine if my hard disk is bad or if the problem is
motherboard related or something else entirely.
When booting 10. CE, after running POST, I occasionally get:
Disk boot failure: Insert systems disk and press enter to continue
Yesterday I received a
I am looking for the published list of supported hardware,
but I cannot access anything from here:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/hardware.php3
In case anyone knows, I am specifically looking
information on the LCD monitor Nec Multisync LCD 1760nx
with a nVIDIA GeForce 4 MX graphic card.
The
I am looking for the published list of supported hardware,
but I cannot access anything from here:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/hardware.php3
Yep. The page seems to be broken.
--
Mandrake HowTo's More: http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
02, 2003 5:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] supported Hardware list
I am looking for the published list of supported hardware,
but I cannot access anything from here:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/hardware.php3
In case anyone knows, I am specifically looking
information
A Soltek board, just bought, says that using a 2x graphics board will
fry the mobo (wrong voltage). The G-Force2 MX-400 is a 2x/4x board.
Is it safe to assume that it will have the right voltage, merely
falling back to 2x if the mobo doesn't have the later standard agp?
Anne
--
Registered
On Saturday 30 August 2003 09:47 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
A Soltek board, just bought, says that using a 2x graphics board will
fry the mobo (wrong voltage). The G-Force2 MX-400 is a 2x/4x board.
Is it safe to assume that it will have the right voltage, merely
falling back to 2x if the mobo
On Saturday 30 Aug 2003 4:18 pm, Bart Salien wrote:
Op Saturday 30 August 2003 16:47, schreef Anne Wilson:
Anne ,
Normaly all AGP 4x should be backwards compatible with a AGP 2x .
Unless they ran out of money to properly implement the AGP bus on
your mobo ?
Hi, Bart. No, that's not the
Op Saturday 30 August 2003 16:47, schreef Anne Wilson:
Anne ,
Normaly all AGP 4x should be backwards compatible with a AGP 2x . Unless they
ran out of money to properly implement the AGP bus on your mobo ?
Bart.
A Soltek board, just bought, says that using a 2x graphics board will
fry the
Op Saturday 30 August 2003 17:24, schreef Anne Wilson:
Anne ,
Normaly all AGP 4x should be backwards compatible with a AGP 2x .
Unless they ran out of money to properly implement the AGP bus on
your mobo ?
Hi, Bart. No, that's not the problem. I'm really just asking whether
it's
On Saturday 30 Aug 2003 4:44 pm, Bart Salien wrote:
Op Saturday 30 August 2003 17:24, schreef Anne Wilson:
Anne ,
Normaly all AGP 4x should be backwards compatible with a AGP 2x
. Unless they ran out of money to properly implement the AGP
bus on your mobo ?
Hi, Bart. No,
On Saturday 30 Aug 2003 6:27 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:47 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
A Soltek board, just bought, says that using a 2x graphics board
will fry the mobo (wrong voltage). The G-Force2 MX-400 is a
2x/4x board. Is it safe to assume that it will have the
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 02:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
A Soltek board, just bought, says that using a 2x graphics board will
fry the mobo (wrong voltage). The G-Force2 MX-400 is a 2x/4x board.
Is it safe to assume that it will have the right voltage, merely
falling back to 2x if the mobo doesn't have
Hi
i wrote some time ago about the slow handling of mandrake (i mean that it
takes too much time until the programs start up). so i downloaded the
kernel 2.4.19-24mdk as someone suggested (thank you greg!). with this
update there are some improvements!! but konquero and the games are still
On Tuesday February 11 2003 01:37 pm, Yaakov wrote:
Hi
i wrote some time ago about the slow handling of mandrake (i mean
that it takes too much time until the programs start up). so i
downloaded the kernel 2.4.19-24mdk as someone suggested (thank you
greg!). with this update there are some
On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:12 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:06 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
Well.. for starters, P4's have MUCH better thermal resistance, not to
mention a thermal diode that can regulate the core CPU temperature if the
fan happens to fail, or if the
On Monday 27 January 2003 04:04 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 26 Jan 2003 11:12 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:06 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
Well.. for starters, P4's have MUCH better thermal resistance, not to
mention a thermal diode that can regulate the core CPU
On Monday 27 Jan 2003 3:31 pm, et wrote:
On Monday 27 January 2003 04:04 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 26 Jan 2003 11:12 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:06 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
Well.. for starters, P4's have MUCH better thermal resistance, not to
mention a
Paul wrote:
Yup, no problem. I am of course NOT going to twiddle the running drives
around, but they function wonderfully either on the side or straight up.
changing hd position was meant to be after power off and spin down. i have seen
drives develop problems and only run at new angle. i
1/26/03 1:46:32 AM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reply to Stephen's mail, d.d. 26 Jan 2003 12:21:17 +1100:
What if there is a mercury switch in either the PSU or somewhere
within
the casing itself that would cause this?
I have been thinking about this also, but I have not been able to
On Sunday 26 January 2003 02:43 am, Paul wrote:
In reply to g's mail, d.d. Sun, 26 Jan 2003 00:56:31 +:
knowledge of your back broke desktop/tower contents would be helpful.
if it is still running, i would suggest 3 possible problems to go after
first.
#1 = power supply:
does fan
On Sunday January 26 2003 01:43 am, Paul wrote:
Yes, they both show on LM Sensors (through Gkrellm).
The CPU (Athlon 1200) shows 78C (149F) and something else shows
29.2C (75.5F). I am not sure if I set the multiplier readings in
Gkrellm correctly, but this is what I also could see (plus or
Paul wrote:
No, it keeps going.
No. There is still power on the mainboard led and the leds of the network
cards.
Both. Same result.
Yes and yes.
No, it is not. I cannot imagine that it does. I can leave the PC off for 2
hours, which should be enough to cool off most parts. When I
On Sunday 26 Jan 2003 2:17 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday January 26 2003 01:43 am, Paul wrote:
Yes, they both show on LM Sensors (through Gkrellm).
The CPU (Athlon 1200) shows 78C (149F) and something else shows
29.2C (75.5F). I am not sure if I set the multiplier readings in
Gkrellm
On Sunday 26 Jan 2003 5:04 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday January 26 2003 09:11 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
Tom - I'm not doubting you, and I'll certainly keep this post for
reference, but how is that affected by orientation? Why would it
run longer if on its side?
Anne
Heat rises
On Sun, January 26 2003 11:28 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
*snip*
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, my Athlon 900 runs around 50C, 24x7. I
do worry about the weight of current heatsinks and fans - to say nothing of
the fact that I have a heart attack every time I have to try to deal with
those
On Sunday 26 Jan 2003 5:47 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Sun, January 26 2003 11:28 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
*snip*
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, my Athlon 900 runs around 50C, 24x7. I
do worry about the weight of current heatsinks and fans - to say nothing
of the fact that I have a heart
1/26/03 10:24:16 AM, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reply to g's mail, d.d. Sun, 26 Jan 2003 15:05:48 +:
from your replies, it is now to decide if problems is with
mainboard
or if you have a harddrive problem.
with box in normal upright position, put harddrive on it's side.
does system
On Sun, January 26 2003 11:49 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
*snip*
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, my Athlon 900 runs around 50C, 24x7.
I do worry about the weight of current heatsinks and fans - to say
nothing of the fact that I have a heart attack every time I have to try
to deal with
On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:06 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
Well.. for starters, P4's have MUCH better thermal resistance, not to
mention a thermal diode that can regulate the core CPU temperature if the
fan happens to fail, or if the heatsink happens to fall off.. Many 3rd
party tests have shown
In reply to Anne's mail, d.d. Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:49:45 +:
And see.. this is why I spent the extra 20 bucks and bought a Pentium IV
1.6, instead of the Athlon 1800 (which runs at 1400mhz I think)
No, I don't see. Why?
I guess these do not suffer from 'overweight problems' of fans. ;)
On Sun, January 26 2003 5:12 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
*snip*
Thats interesting. I always thought that AMDs' chips were better performers
at the same speed rangefrom what I've read. (but I'm no expert).
Really dependant upon what your doing, AMD's ARE better performance/mhz
usually.. but..
On Sun, January 26 2003 1:03 pm, Paul wrote:
*snip*
I guess these do not suffer from 'overweight problems' of fans. ;)
Paul
No, it's because P4's don't overheat.. period. They throttle their clock
speed, to reduce heat. if they detect overheating, so where thermal
management on an Athlon
On Sunday January 26 2003 05:12 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Sunday 26 January 2003 06:06 pm, Chuck Burns wrote:
prevents the core temp. from reaching critical levels.. (Not to
mention the 400-533mhz cache speeds, compared to athlon's measly
200mhz.. :p)
Thats interesting. I always
Okay... I tried every trick in the book (and outside of it). And it is
still a riddle.
I just about took the entire machine apart again, put it back together
with basically just the video card and the mainboard. No CDRom, no
soundcard, no nothing. Standing upright it collapses within 15 minutes.
On Saturday 25 Jan 2003 8:00 pm, wrote:
Okay... I tried every trick in the book (and outside of it). And it is
still a riddle.
I just about took the entire machine apart again, put it back together
with basically just the video card and the mainboard. No CDRom, no
soundcard, no nothing.
In reply to Anne's mail, d.d. Sat, 25 Jan 2003 20:10:26 +:
There's only one solution, then. Pretend your tower was a desktop all
along :)
Woohahahahaa!!! It is a tower with a bad back! ;)
Thanks for the grin.
Paul
--
The more we live by our intellect,
the less we understand the meaning of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
moment the PC is on its side again and it runs. Since 5 minutes now, but
I am confident that it will stay up.
knowledge of your back broke desktop/tower contents would be helpful.
if it is still running, i would suggest 3 possible problems to go after first.
#1 =
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 11:56, g wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
moment the PC is on its side again and it runs. Since 5 minutes now, but
I am confident that it will stay up.
knowledge of your back broke desktop/tower contents would be helpful.
if it is still running, i would suggest
In reply to g's mail, d.d. Sun, 26 Jan 2003 00:56:31 +:
knowledge of your back broke desktop/tower contents would be helpful.
if it is still running, i would suggest 3 possible problems to go after
first.
#1 = power supply:
does fan stop?
No, it keeps going.
do you lose all voltages?
In reply to Stephen's mail, d.d. 26 Jan 2003 12:21:17 +1100:
What if there is a mercury switch in either the PSU or somewhere within
the casing itself that would cause this?
I have been thinking about this also, but I have not been able to find a
switch like that. More and more I feel that this
Hello all,
Forgive this OT post, but can someone point me into the right direction?
My PC is going nuts. When it is upright, it won't boot properly (powers off
immediately after switching it on). When it lies on the side, the system
keeps running without a problem when switched on.
Already had
3:30 PM
To: newbie
Subject: [newbie] OT: hardware weirdness
Hello all,
Forgive this OT post, but can someone point me into the right direction?
My PC is going nuts. When it is upright, it won't boot properly (powers
off
immediately after switching it on). When it lies on the side, the system
On Friday 24 Jan 2003 3:29 pm, Paul wrote:
Hello all,
Forgive this OT post, but can someone point me into the right direction?
My PC is going nuts. When it is upright, it won't boot properly (powers off
immediately after switching it on). When it lies on the side, the system
keeps running
On Friday 24 Jan 2003 4:05 pm, David Robertson wrote:
On Friday 24 Jan 2003 3:29 pm, Paul wrote:
Hello all,
Forgive this OT post, but can someone point me into the right direction?
My PC is going nuts. When it is upright, it won't boot properly (powers
off immediately after switching it
On Friday 24 Jan 2003 4:25 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Don't you do that when you're checking on hardware jobs you've just done?
I always do before righting it and closing the case.
Anne
Well, no. but maybe that's because I'm not a computer professional!
I'm a gynaecologist, actually.
In reply to David's mail, d.d. Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:05:24 +:
Um, can't even begin to think of a reason, other than a loose connection
somewhere. If you've looked at all the internals, maybe there's a probelm
with the power cable?
I suspect some loose connection 'somewhere'. The stranger it
- Original Message -
From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] OT: hardware weirdness
On Friday 24 Jan 2003 4:32 pm, David Robertson wrote:
On Friday 24 Jan 2003 4:25 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Don't you do
In reply to et's mail, d.d. Fri, 24 Jan 2003 11:41:39 -0500:
describe further... the pci cards sit horzontal and mother board vertical,
when you say When it lies on the side. and when you say it won't boot
properly (powers off immediately after switching it on) does power off
mean no ac at all?
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 02:29, Paul wrote:
Hello all,
Forgive this OT post, but can someone point me into the right direction?
My PC is going nuts. When it is upright, it won't boot properly (powers off
immediately after switching it on). When it lies on the side, the system
keeps running
Has the ZDNet database moved or is it just down for two days now?
--
Michael
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Microsoft Apologist (and ZDNet editor) David Berlind took it down a while ago.
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:33:58 +1300, Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has the ZDNet database moved or is it just down for two days now?
--
Michael
--
Sridhar Dhanapalan
[Yama |
Thanks Sridhar, good to see you are still lurking here. Your occassional
advice has been invaluable from time to time.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 02:42, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
Microsoft Apologist (and ZDNet editor) David Berlind took it down a while
ago.
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:33:58 +1300,
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 00:42, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
Microsoft Apologist (and ZDNet editor) David Berlind took it down a while ago.
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:33:58 +1300, Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has the ZDNet database moved or is it just down for two days now?
--
On Thursday 09 January 2003 01:42 pm, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
Microsoft Apologist (and ZDNet editor) David Berlind
took it down a while ago.
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:33:58 +1300, Michael Adams
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has the ZDNet database moved or is it just down for
two days now?
Sridhar:
Are you aware of another Linux HCL? I sometimes refer to the Mandrake list,
but sometimes its a good idea to get a second opinion.
-- cmg
On Thursday 09 January 2003 08:42 am, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
Microsoft Apologist (and ZDNet editor) David Berlind took it down a while
ago.
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux Hardware Database
Sridhar:
Are you aware of another Linux HCL? I sometimes refer to the
Mandrake list,
but sometimes its a good idea to get a second opinion.
-- cmg
On Thursday 09 January 2003 08:42 am, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
Microsoft Apologist
On Sunday 29 Dec 2002 10:03 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
Till then I leave you with the thought that like any hardware or compy
junky, I tried? :)
Thx for saving me the trouble of ripping my pink hair out.
Well, I've just wasted another day, trying to revive a dodo :) Some of us
don't know
On Sunday 29 Dec 2002 3:52 am, Joeb wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:38:55 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:06 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a
snip
Hehe, but I like the experiment! It sounded fun! :( Party pooper... K
i'll play safe look where you suggest... Sigh... Can I at least play in
my room Dad?
snip
Try eggs in a microwave then - safeish but VERY messy *G*
Best if you paint faces of Bill M$ on them first.
I thought
At 09:17 AM 12/29/2002 +, you wrote:
I've come to this rather late, but since I've had one of these boards, I'll
add my 2p worth :)
On a board that old it's unlikely that you have peripherals that would need a
higher power supply.
I would say that there is a very high chance that Joeb is
On Sunday 29 Dec 2002 9:01 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
At 09:17 AM 12/29/2002 +, you wrote:
I've come to this rather late, but since I've had one of these boards,
I'll add my 2p worth :)
On a board that old it's unlikely that you have peripherals that would
need a higher power supply.
I
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 09:50, FemmeFatale wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh Is
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
-
FemmeFatale
One of the more simple ways of finding the wattage of a power supply is
to do the following:
1.)
At 05:52 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700, you wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh Is
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
Dumb question, I'm sure, Femme, but did you look at the PS itself?
Usually there's a
At 06:06 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label?
Besides the label (watt listing or model )or your comp manual, if it is
a pre-built system, you could use a voltage meter
On Saturday 28 December 2002 05:50 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh Is
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
-
FemmeFatale
Good Decisions You boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:36:48 -0700, you wrote:
At 05:52 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700, you wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh Is
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
Dumb question, I'm sure, Femme, but did
At 06:44 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Saturday 28 December 2002 05:50 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh Is
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
-
FemmeFatale
Good Decisions You boss Made:
We'll do as you
On Saturday 28 December 2002 07:15 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
At 06:44 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Saturday 28 December 2002 05:50 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh
Is there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
At 07:23 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Saturday 28 December 2002 07:15 pm, FemmeFatale wrote:
Depends on what you are doing with it. Outside of the CPU, the most current
draw will be the disk drives and the new ones draw very little power. Of
course a high powered graphics accelerator will
On Saturday 28 December 2002 23:06, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label?
Besides the label (watt listing or model )or your comp manual, if it is
a pre-built system, you
On Saturday 28 December 2002 05:50 pm, you wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh Is
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
-
FemmeFatale
Good Decisions You boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
At 09:52 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Saturday 28 December 2002 05:50 pm, you wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label? Thx. Oh Is
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
Merci
-
FemmeFatale
Good Decisions You boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest
At 01:59 AM 12/29/2002 +, you wrote:
On Saturday 28 December 2002 23:06, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label?
Besides the label (watt listing or model )or your comp
On Sunday 29 December 2002 02:39, FemmeFatale wrote:
At 01:59 AM 12/29/2002 +, you wrote:
On Saturday 28 December 2002 23:06, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
there any diff between AT ATX P/S's?
SNIP
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:38:55 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:06 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject says it all... any ideas besides reading a label?
Besides the label (watt listing or model
At 09:52 PM 12/28/2002 -0600, you wrote:
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:38:55 -0700
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 06:06 PM 12/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Using the ATX power supply may not work for you. Even though the board
may accept either one (I've got a board like that), the power
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 15:56, FemmeFatale wrote:
Nothing... Just wanted to get rid of another AT case if I can. I have 3
now, and am getting rid of 2 as soon as I can. Maybe someone in Edmonton
wants em? Cause I sure don't. :)
-
FemmeFatale
Too bad y'all don't wanna send
On Sunday 08 December 2002 00:02, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Hi,
This is somewhat an illegitimate question, as it deals with hardware and
not with linux per se. However, since there are quite a few helpful folks
around here, and since my laptop runs Mandrake 9, I dare this breach of
etiquette:
Hi,
Ok. But does keeping my laptop with the battery inside CONSTANTILY
connected to the power outlet qualify as recharging or not (since the
battery does not really discharge the battery to being with, right?).
Thanks,
Andrei
Every time you charge a Li-ion battery you shorten it's life
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 16:53, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Hi,
Ok. But does keeping my laptop with the battery inside CONSTANTILY
connected to the power outlet qualify as recharging or not (since the
battery does not really discharge the battery to being with, right?).
Thanks,
Andrei
On Sunday 08 Dec 2002 H:02 am, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Hi,
This is somewhat an illegitimate question, as it deals with hardware and
not with linux per se. However, since there are quite a few helpful folks
around here, and since my laptop runs Mandrake 9, I dare this breach of
etiquette:
I
Hi,
This is somewhat an illegitimate question, as it deals with hardware and not
with linux per se. However, since there are quite a few helpful folks
around here, and since my laptop runs Mandrake 9, I dare this breach of
etiquette:
I was given an old Quantex N30W-15 (on which Mandrake 9
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 11:02, Andrei Raevsky wrote:
Hi,
This is somewhat an illegitimate question, as it deals with hardware and not
with linux per se. However, since there are quite a few helpful folks
around here, and since my laptop runs Mandrake 9, I dare this breach of
etiquette:
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 05:52, FemmeFatale wrote:
Duct tape. It solves everything. Or so says my friend Red Green *Smiles
innocently*
---
Femme
Even dating problems?
--
Wed Nov 27 07:30:00 EST 2002
.o0 linux user:267497 0o.
|____
1 - 100 di 178 matches
Mail list logo
