Chris Mahan wrote:
I look forward to the discussion this is going to generate, namely: can Sun
do the same to OpenSolaris, and if not, why not, what's preventing them. I'm
looking for sound legal reasons, not Sun's goodwill.
I know nothing about OpenDS, and I bet very few here are involved
ummm... distcc?
http://distcc.samba.org/
It's mainly for gcc, but
distcc is not itself a compiler, but rather a front-end to the GNU C/C++
compiler (gcc). (There is preliminary support for some other compilers but the
main focus is gcc.) Almost all gcc options and features work as normal.
I'd
Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago titled Restoring Sun
approved governance :
https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.
html?rev=3475r1=3475r2=3474 ?
I'm not sure where you get 8 hours ago? I count nearly 9 days.
Shawn Walker wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 3:02 AM, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mahan wrote:
I look forward to the discussion this is going to generate, namely: can Sun
do the same to OpenSolaris, and if not, why not, what's preventing them. I'm
looking for sound legal reasons, not
Here is an example of the format I follow to create iso images.
# mkdir dir1
# ls -al
total 6
drwx-- 3 root root 512 Nov 30 09:30 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 512 Nov 5 14:34 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 512 Nov 30 09:30 dir1
# mkisofs -l -o dir1.iso dir1
The following is a portion of my /boot/grub/menu.lst file that does the
S10/S11/SuSE multiple boot. Very rudimentary, but adequate for my need anyway.
title Solaris Express Community Edition snv_76 X86
kernel$ /platform/i86pc/kernel/$ISADIR/unix
module$ /platform/i86pc/$ISADIR/boot_archive
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Currently, there is no way to force a processor to a
lower frequency. A
feature we'll be adding to Solaris soon.
As for what determining what frequencies your
processors are running at,
you can find that out from the cpu_info kstat.
$ kstat -m cpu_info -s
Mark Haywood wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Also useful would be a message when the speed is
reduced. I get messages like:
cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info] NOTICE:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max power
of 200
In some of our machines we have S10, SXDE, two versions of SXCE, two versions
of SuSE, and WinXP, sitting peacefully in a multi-stage multi-boot
configuration. We are thinking about putting everything under a single
umbrella, i.e., a future version of SXCE, via xVM. Anyone cares to comment?
Currently, there is no way to force a processor to a
lower frequency. A
feature we'll be adding to Solaris soon.
As for what determining what frequencies your
processors are running at,
you can find that out from the cpu_info kstat.
$ kstat -m cpu_info -s current_clock_Hz
Thank you
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Also useful would be a message when the speed is
reduced. I get messages like:
cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info] NOTICE:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max power
of 200
0 MHz
but dont see any if the speed is reduce - I've
On Nov 30, 2007 9:31 AM, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Don't you realise that stuff like this only continues to cement the
view that the left hand doesn't know what the right hand at Sun is
doing?
The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Ok.
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 09:44, Ché Kristo wrote:
Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago titled
Restoring Sun approved governance :
https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.html?rev=3475r1=3475r2=3474
On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:28, Shawn Walker wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 9:25 AM, Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:18, Shawn Walker wrote:
I often hear the excuse that we're still learning -- but some
things
are plain ole' common sense.
Sadly common sense isn't that
On Nov 30, 2007 9:25 AM, Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:18, Shawn Walker wrote:
I often hear the excuse that we're still learning -- but some things
are plain ole' common sense.
Sadly common sense isn't that common, nor is there universal
agreement what it
On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:18, Shawn Walker wrote:
I often hear the excuse that we're still learning -- but some things
are plain ole' common sense.
Sadly common sense isn't that common, nor is there universal
agreement what it means.
S.
___
On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:04, Shawn Walker wrote:
Please understand that I, as an outsider, had no way to independently
verify the situation since a good portion of it was related to
internal Sun communications.
Totally understand.
In retrospect, I should have titled my original posting
On Nov 30, 2007 6:11 AM, Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 11:20, UNIX admin wrote:
Hi Jim,
I don't know about Shawn, but I'll write for myself:
I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI directly to Jonathan
Schwartz.
I also expect Sun employees to
On Nov 30, 2007, at 14:41, Shawn Walker wrote:
It's hard not to focus on Sun when their management team's inability
to clearly communicate both inside and outside of their company
continues to make the communities they participate in look like
nothing more than a pr move and leads to
Chris Mahan wrote:
I look forward to the discussion this is going to generate, namely: can
Sun do the same to OpenSolaris, and if not, why not, what's preventing
them. I'm looking for sound legal reasons, not Sun's goodwill.
Sun management approved the current OpenSolaris charter
On Nov 30, 2007 3:02 AM, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mahan wrote:
I look forward to the discussion this is going to generate, namely: can Sun
do the same to OpenSolaris, and if not, why not, what's preventing them. I'm
looking for sound legal reasons, not Sun's goodwill.
On Nov 30, 2007 3:29 AM, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsystems/
You know, I'm wondering why you chose to write that subject line, Shawn.
There are no middle
Shawn Walker wrote:
Don't you realise that stuff like this only continues to cement the
view that the left hand doesn't know what the right hand at Sun is
doing?
The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Ok. Guilty. Why
is that surprising? It's a large organization and many
On Nov 30, 2007 6:02 AM, MC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't we stick to OpenSolaris community and
development issues rather than getting sucked into corporate politics?
I don't know what is true and untrue in this thread, but I think what these
guys are getting at is that if someone at
On Nov 30, 2007 9:02 AM, Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 14:41, Shawn Walker wrote:
It's hard not to focus on Sun when their management team's inability
to clearly communicate both inside and outside of their company
continues to make the communities they
Hi Tom,
Tom Chen wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering if I can install both Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris (11) on the
same x86 machine? I hope I can use a boot loader to select which OS to boot.
Yes, I've got 3 different flavors of Solaris (10, TX, OpenSolaris) + a
XP installed on my x86 laptop.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 4:02 AM, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
I know nothing about OpenDS, and I bet very few here are involved
either. This is an OpenSolaris forum. Sun has already demonstrated its
good will by opening /this/ project and enabling /these/ engineers
to
interact with /this/ community.
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OpenSolaris governance model needed to be approved by Sun before
it was put up for a community vote; that was all conducted in the
Open. What that means is also that we cannot change the governance
model without renewed approval.
Hi,
does someone know how to create a bootable
install image (aka .iso file)? I have managed
to tweak an image for zfs boot. But the whole
content resides in a directory now and I don´t
have a clou how to get a bootable install image
from it.
The steps I did were:
1. I took the downloaded
On Nov 30, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
Notice I said four of the points, I can certainly see the relevance in
the fifth, which could easily get lost in the noise generated by the
others. This isn't a Sun HR list.
Oh, come on. Stop being such a pedant.
/dale
On Nov 30, 2007, at 11:20, UNIX admin wrote:
Hi Jim,
I don't know about Shawn, but I'll write for myself:
I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI directly to Jonathan
Schwartz.
I also expect Sun employees to back up their now former colleague
and show that they have spine, and
Why can't we stick to OpenSolaris community and
development issues rather than getting sucked into corporate politics?
I don't know what is true and untrue in this thread, but I think what these
guys are getting at is that if someone at Sun Microsystems can do this to
OpenDS: Sun’s intention
How do you expect us Sun employees to react
to mail like this?
Hi Jim,
I don't know about Shawn, but I'll write for
myself:
I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI
directly to Jonathan Schwartz.
I also expect Sun employees to back up their now
former colleague
Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago
titled Restoring Sun approved governance :
https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trun
/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.
html?rev=3475r1=3475r2=3474 ?
I'm not sure where you get 8 hours ago? I count
nearly
I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI directly to Jonathan Schwartz.
I also expect Sun employees to back up their now former colleague and show
that they have spine, and complain to Jonathan about this incident.
If the incident is indeed as it transpired but it seems that the story
is
How do you expect us Sun employees to react
to mail like this?
Hi Jim,
I don't know about Shawn, but I'll write for myself:
I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI directly to Jonathan Schwartz.
I also expect Sun employees to back up their now former colleague and show that
they have
On Nov 30, 2007, at 09:44, Ché Kristo wrote:
Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago titled
Restoring Sun approved governance : https://opends.dev.java.net/
source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-
Governance.html?rev=3475r1=3475r2=3474 ?
That is the
Hi guys, I'm a middle manager at Sun. I figured you wouldn't know I'm
out here if I didn't speak up, so here I go. I manage the globalization
team in Beijing and lots of people in my team contribute to
OpenSolaris. I read every single posting on this forum.
- melanie
Ché Kristo wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 05:01, Shawn Walker wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-
the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsystems/
I've been investigating. Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/ys5hf3 -
this was the change Neil et al made to the governance. All
Che Kristo wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
What do 4 out of the above 5 questions have to do with OpenSolaris?
OK, let look at it:
Point 1 - if this sort of behavior is condoned who is to say that the
same thing could not happen with OpenSolaris
That would probably require Sun laying off most
Shawn Walker wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-op
en-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsyst
ems/
You know, I'm wondering why you chose to write that
subject line, Shawn.
There are no middle managers here on these lists.
There are only project
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
On Nov 29, 2007 9:01 PM, Shawn Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-op
en-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-s
un-microsystems/
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to
Shawn Walker wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsystems/
You know, I'm wondering why you chose to write that subject line, Shawn.
There are no middle managers here on these lists. There are only project
managers who
Thats my current approach. By using a kernel module there are even less
occasions where the whole kernel need to be compiled. But still, it hurts to
wait on those occasions :)
Thanks for all your help.
/M
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Also useful would be a message when the speed is
reduced. I get messages like:
cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info] NOTICE:
cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has new max power
of 200
0 MHz
but dont see any if the speed is reduce - I've no
idea if it does reduce.
If you get many of
On Nov 30, 2007 9:04 AM, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 3:02 AM, Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Mahan wrote:
I look forward to the discussion this is going to generate, namely: can
Sun
do the same to OpenSolaris, and if not,
On Nov 30, 2007, at 13:29, UNIX admin wrote:
I've been investigating. Take a look at
http://tinyurl.com/ys5hf3 -
this was the change Neil et al made to the
governance.
Dear Mr. Phipps, I can see the nicely colored changes, but without
knowing who made which change, even the pretty
I've been investigating. Take a look at
http://tinyurl.com/ys5hf3 -
this was the change Neil et al made to the
governance.
Dear Mr. Phipps, I can see the nicely colored changes, but without knowing who
made which change, even the pretty colors are pretty meaningless to me.
Anyways, that's
Hi guys, I'm a middle manager at Sun. I figured you
wouldn't know I'm
out here if I didn't speak up, so here I go. I
manage the globalization
team in Beijing and lots of people in my team
contribute to
OpenSolaris. I read every single posting on this
forum.
- melanie
Thanks
How do you expect us Sun employees to react
to mail like this?
Hi Jim,
I don't know about Shawn, but I'll write for myself:
I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI
directly to Jonathan Schwartz.
I also expect Sun employees to back up their now
former colleague and show that
Dale Ghent wrote:
As such, one would expect for these projects to be treated somewhat
consistently by Sun. If the allegations are true in the OpenDS
kerfuffle, you can make a spot on bet that I (at least) would want to
know if an analog of that could happen to OpenSolaris.
I don't
On Nov 30, 2007 9:18 AM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Sun is so inexperienced in this area, perhaps they should have
considered hiring someone who is as a community manager, and ensuring
that he drives their decisions instead of stumbling around?
I would like to clarify that this
52 matches
Mail list logo
