From: Stan Halpin
What some of us object to is the big pop-up that appears about 1
second into the page-load process. The pop-up covers about 80-90% of
the window and (for me at least) is blank. Presumably, if I wait long
enough, some advertising pitch will appear in that pop-up. I have
never
You need a space in there between 127.0.0.1 and ads.doubleclick.net.
The line should read:
127.0.0.1 ads.doubleclick.net
Comments in the hosts file begin with '#'
There's a good site for pre-written hosts files:
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm
Also contains a lot of troubleshooting
From: drd1...@gmail.com
I think I'll just continue to cuss at the ad. Carry on, gentlefolk.
Or you could go to http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm and download
the batch file that will automatically install a new hosts file that has
a current list of most abuse sites.
If you have an
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:27 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: drd1...@gmail.com
I think I'll just continue to cuss at the ad. Carry on, gentlefolk.
Or you could go to http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm and download the
batch file that will automatically install a new
On 2011-06-30 16:40 , John Sessoms wrote:
I don't even get the little bar across the top that I occasionally get
from other sites that says Firefox has prevented this site from opening
a pop-up window.
that's because the pop-ups we're talking about aren't actual windows,
they are javascript
On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
On 11-06-29 12:13 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
[...] But we're deviating from the topic here.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 1:09 PM
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on
photo.net
On 28/06/2011 02:48, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's commerce in a free society, and, for the most part, it works.
The evidence of your own eyes here shows that to be incorrect with at
least this, admittedly, small and self-selecting sample. The reactions
vary from so what to vehement
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
It was, ahem, ad hominem...
I just knew someone would come back with an ad lib comment.
Probably some ad hawk.
Adieu believe this thread will continue.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:01:32PM +0200, mike wilson wrote:
On 28/06/2011 02:48, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's commerce in a free society, and, for the most part, it works.
The evidence of your own eyes here shows that to be incorrect with
at least this, admittedly, small and
It's commerce in a free society, and, for the most part, it works.
The evidence of your own eyes here shows that to be incorrect with at
least this, admittedly, small and self-selecting sample. The reactions
vary from so what to vehement abhorrence. Not the response I would
want if I was
On 11-06-29 2:08 PM, Bob W wrote:
It's commerce in a free society, and, for the most part, it works.
The evidence of your own eyes here shows that to be incorrect with at
least this, admittedly, small and self-selecting sample. The reactions
vary from so what to vehement abhorrence. Not the
In Windows, open C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts in notepad and
add a line that says 127.0.0.1ads.doubleclick.net then restart your
computer and links to that server will go straight to nirvana =)
2011/6/29 Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com:
Bruce,
Oh you gotta give us more details on
Ecke PDML wrote:
In Windows, open C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts in notepad and
add a line that says 127.0.0.1ads.doubleclick.net then restart your
computer and links to that server will go straight to nirvana =)
Also:
127.0.0.1 doubleclick.net
127.0.0.1 ad-g.doubleclick.net
127.0.0.1
: Re: Photo.net no more
Ecke PDML wrote:
In Windows, open C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts in notepad and
add a line that says 127.0.0.1ads.doubleclick.net then restart your
computer and links to that server will go straight to nirvana =)
Also:
127.0.0.1 doubleclick.net
127.0.0.1 ad
Bob, as Ecke and Mark point out, you can poison hostname lookups to
doubleclick.net (and any other ad-domain hostname you please) right on
your local workstation by adding entries to the HOSTS file. That's
/etc/hosts on UNIX offspring (Linux, *BSD, and Mac OS X). It's
On 28 June 2011 11:43, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
(snip)
I assume you're a flickr members, so that's why the ads are
inconspicuous. They're not inconspicuous for non-members. The same is true of
photo.net for the most part. However, I think photo.net should avoid
/southernlight/
, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's
an annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't
want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see
ads on the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
interior of the bus as well. And if they
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Bob W wrote:
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't
want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see
ads on the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
On 28 June 2011 11:43, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
(snip)
I assume you're a flickr members, so that's why the ads are
inconspicuous. They're not inconspicuous for non
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Unfortunately, the advertisers don't lose. Pop-ups score more hits than
banner ads. I don't know why. Like you, I click them off immediately.
Maybe some people have bad aim.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Sandy Harris
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch
time of the Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of
Smugmug... it's an annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
From: Bob W
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't
want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see
ads on the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
interior of the bus as well.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:40 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I understand what you're saying, but I just don't see the in-yer-face
intrusive nature of the advertising at photo.net.
I am not a member of photo.net, so if it's bad I should be getting the brunt
of it. Right?
I
On 28 June 2011 20:50, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for information purposes, I get a pop up window with an ad that I have
to close in order to see the picture. I use a MacBook with Safari.
Are you referring to Flickr or photo.net? I get an occasional pop up
at photo.net but never at
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
... I assume you're a flickr members, so that's why the ads are
inconspicuous. They're not inconspicuous for non-members. ...
Again, if I send you the links to photos like this:
What some of us object to is the big pop-up that appears about 1 second into
the page-load process. The pop-up covers about 80-90% of the window and (for me
at least) is blank. Presumably, if I wait long enough, some advertising pitch
will appear in that pop-up. I have never waited long enough
On 28/06/2011 3:35 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
A wee testy today? That wasn't an attack any more than saying you are an
American from Detroit is an attack.
Well, I suppose that might be an attack.
--
William Robb
--
flickr is way cleaner than photo.net for showing a single photo. just
check out godfrey's examples. habit is another thing tough, your eyes
immediately knowing where to look is always a help. but it usually
takes only a couple dozen visits to get used to any layout.
f
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:03
On Jun 28, 2011, at 2:37 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jun 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Bob W wrote:
I lose, you lose, photo.net loses, the advertisers lose. How can you think
that works?
Unfortunately, the advertisers don't lose. Pop-ups score more hits than
banner ads. I don't know
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
I can relate to Paul Stenquist here, who has great many pictures on
photo.net and re-uploading them may be a big effort for him
Bob W wrote:
OK, I'm not forced to read or avoid the ads before I can get on the bus. I
don't strongly object to sites, or buses, carrying ads, what I object to is
the in-yer-face intrusive approach that photo.net have taken with theirs
which spoils the experience of looking at your photos and
On Jun 28, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
OK, I'm not forced to read or avoid the ads before I can get on the bus. I
don't strongly object to sites, or buses, carrying ads, what I object to is
the in-yer-face intrusive approach that photo.net have taken with theirs
It was, ahem, ad hominem...
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Bob W wrote:
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
It was, ahem, ad hominem...
I just knew someone
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bob W wrote:
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:14 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great
the thread will continue until someone invokes Godwin's Law and takes it ad olf
2011/6/29 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bob W wrote:
We can always count on Robb for a childish personal attack. How trite.
On Jun 28,
On 11-06-27 1:09 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
picture. [...]
I'm no fan of photo.net, but I've never seen these popups and I see very
few of the banner ads, so I've been
Bruce,
Oh you gotta give us more details on that!
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11-06-27 1:09 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss
/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 1:09 PM
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on
photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial
On 6/28/2011 23:18, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
I can relate to Paul Stenquist here, who has great many pictures on
photo.net and re
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
picture. This is unacceptable behavior and, sorry folks, I just ain't
clicking on any more photo.net links.
FYI, for those folks depending on photo.net hosting
the
picture. This is unacceptable behavior and, sorry folks, I just ain't
clicking on any more photo.net links.
FYI, for those folks depending on photo.net hosting, this sort of
abuse-the-users behavior smacks of desperation; you might want to
think about finding an alternate home for your
.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
picture. This is unacceptable behavior and, sorry folks, I just ain't
clicking on any more
. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
picture. This is unacceptable behavior and, sorry folks, I just
ain't
clicking on any more photo.net links.
FYI, for those folks depending on photo.net hosting, this sort of
abuse-the-users behavior smacks
tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 1:09 PM
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on
photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I
could see the
picture. This is unacceptable
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 1:09 PM
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on
photo.net. It popped up
On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
Every time the photo.net ad pops up, I grumble to
of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
The Flicker interface has other problems for me...can never tell which
picture I'm supposed to look at.
If I send you the links
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/5865448384/lightbox/
or
: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 10:25 AM
Really, it can't be that difficult or
tiring to actually click on a
x, is it? Oh well.
Dan
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
wrote:
I just clicked on a PESO
Apparently it isn't universal - I don't get the pop up ad.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com
Subject: Photo.net no more
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial
On 27/06/2011, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
I made a decision
On 11-06-27 3:26 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Every time the
I have to say that I'm tired of the ads and the attitude. Too commercial
for me.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 10:25 AM
Really, it can't be that difficult or
tiring to actually click on a
x, is it? Oh well.
Dan
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tim Bray tb
On 2011-06-27 15:26, Larry Colen wrote:
How much would people be willing to pay for a photo hosting site that didn't
suck?
I pay about US$ 10 a month for mine.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Den 27. juni 2011 kl. 21.26 skrev Larry Colen:
How much would people be willing to pay for a photo hosting site that didn't
suck?
I think I pay about $80 a year to the web hotel and made everything in
Rapidweaver (about $60 on apple app store). A nice thing is that if it sucks at
least it
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads. I've considered changing but I have over
3000 images on photo.net, and Im paid up through 2012. Plus, I don't really
have time go fool around with something new. I really don't
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Scott Loveless
[...]
I may start hosting my own again, because the photo hosting sites are
like operating systems - they all suck.
Hear, hear!
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: 27 June 2011 21:38
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
Photo.net members don't see the ads. I've considered changing but I
have over 3000 images on photo.net, and Im paid
You post a photo of salt shakers and people start commenting on the Buskers.
Often the comments don't seem to follow the pictures.
And the damned interface is still slow!!!
Do they think they are tricking me with those rotating red black balls?
How about just using the old spinning hourglass.
On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: 27 June 2011 21:38
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
Photo.net members don't see the ads. I've considered changing but I
have
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads either.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads either.
well,
On top of which, photo.net is butt-ugly to look at these days.
I pay the $25 to flickr for ad-free photo-sharing with family
friends. For the stuff I care about, I host on my own blog. But to
make it work the way I like it, I had to write a whole bunch of
software, so I can't in good
Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads
.
Jack
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 10:25 AM
Really, it can't be that difficult or
tiring to actually
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of
Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Photo.net members don't see the ads.
Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned
off
(use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads either.
A few of us use Zenfolio. Basic ($25/yr), Unlimited ($50/yr) and Premium
($100/yr) plans available. Customizable, park your own domain there, unlimited
traffic, unlimited storage for all plans above the Basic . . .
http://www.zenfolio.com/zf/all-features.aspx
stan
On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:54 PM,
it will discourage some from
using Photo.net.
Jack
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Daniel J. Matyoladanmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyoladanmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 10:25 AM
Really, it can't be that difficult
From: Ken Waller
Apparently it isn't universal - I don't get the pop up ad.
I don't think I've ever seen a pop-up ad on photo.net
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1388 / Virus Database: 1513/3728 - Release Date: 06/26/11
--
PDML
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't want to
be forced to go shopping first.:
Never go to London with my daughter, then. I'm just saying . . .
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
They know you're too cheap to buy anything, John.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:27 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Ken Waller
Apparently it isn't universal - I don't get the pop up ad.
I don't think I've ever seen a pop-up ad on photo.net
-
No virus found in this
, but I imagine it will discourage some
from using Photo.net.
Jack
--- On Mon, 6/27/11, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Photo.net no more
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, June 27, 2011, 10:25 AM
On Jun 27, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Bob W wrote:
If I get on a bus that says Trafalgar Square on the front, I don't want to
be forced to go shopping first.
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see ads on
the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the
On 2011-06-27 16:16 , Tim Bray wrote:
Hey Paul, would it cost you severe personal or business pain if
photo.net declared bankruptcy tomorrow and shut down on Thursday?
photo.net is among the oldest community websites around; i was once fond
of it and used to read Greenspun's articles and look
On 28 June 2011 10:44, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
(snip) I like ads. No, I love ads.
Paul
I'm not against ads. They let me have a service which costs me
nothing, at the small cost of some inconspicuous advertising on the
page where my work is displayed.
But let me
On 2011-06-27 18:48 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
A fallacious argument. You won't have to go shopping, but you will see ads on
the side of the bus, on the bus shelter, and perhaps on the interior of the bus
as well. And if they weren't there, you'd probably have to pay twice as much to
ride that
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:06 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 28 June 2011 10:44, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
(snip) I like ads. No, I love ads.
Paul
I'm not against ads. They let me have a service which costs me
nothing, at the small cost of some inconspicuous advertising
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, compared to the Flickr interface, or the tectonic launch time of the
Pentax Gallery, or the merely glacial launch time of Smugmug... it's an
annoyance, but not a disabling one.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 07:20:55PM -0600, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-06-27 18:48 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
i'm very good at ignoring ads, but for many people, and especially
when pop-ups are involved, viewing an ad is fairly akin to forced
window-shopping
And forced-to-watch ads are akin to
On 28 June 2011 12:50, Sandy Harris sandyinch...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never seen an intrusive ad on that site. I just tested by
clicking on Rick's
link (Some nice photos there, by the way.) and got no ads.
I'm using Firefox on Linux with so ad-blocking and script-blocking add-ons.
I do not
On 6/27/2011 20:09, Tim Bray wrote:
I just clicked on a PESO hosted on photo.net. It popped up an
interstitial ad that I had to view or dismiss before I could see the
picture. This is unacceptable behavior and, sorry folks, I just ain't
clicking on any more photo.net links.
FYI, for those
On 27/06/2011 6:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
No, I love ads.
To a great extent, you are an ad.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On 6/27/2011 23:06, Chris Mitchell wrote:
I made a decision years ago not to use any photo sharing sites. I want
control of where my images are stored and how they're displayed.
My ISP provides 2Gb of storage (plenty for low res PESOs and GesoS)
and Jalbum is a slick way of creating them - with
89 matches
Mail list logo
