Scott Schwartz writes:
> I got a bunch of them too, until I finally blocked relay1.pair.com
> (DATABYTES=1, since qmail-smtpd doesn't have a way to bounce a message
> cleanly.)
Cute. I like it. Only, the message the user gets back is confusing.
If you add the following four lines to qmail-sm
Why not set up, for each domain an alias, and then do the filtering in
the alias file. This would mean though that even if you reply to a
message, you would need to send the message to the alias.
Here is what I mean. For the domain dom.com, (for which you want to
appear as [EMAIL PROTECTED]), c
Critical Path, which has 7 million mailboxes (last I knew) under qmail
control, is recruiting people with qmail experience. Contact Jerry for
more information.
-russ
p.s. I usually find recruiters to be a pain in the butt. But since
Jerry was so honest and up-front, I thought I'd give him the be
John R. Levine writes:
> I've been using them, and they work pretty well.
>
> One bug I've found is that it doesn't properly handle domains with
> a trailing dot. That is, this is rejected:
>
> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> It looks easy enough to fix, but before I patch the patch, has
>
what it looks like is that he has his .qmail file pointing back to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When messages come in for him, they get sent right back to the list, w/o any
of the headers changing... So the qmail list thinks it came from the person
who posted it..
--Adam
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I got four messages like these. Can anybody tell me what is going on?
It looks like Thorsten Wasmann has a very broken forwarding program
installed. It sees messages addressed to you and to the qmail list
(which is where he got them in the first place),
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 10:48:26PM -0500, John R. Levine wrote:
# >>Has anyone written a patch for Qmail 1.0.3 to reject mail if envelope sender
# >>domain can't be resolved?
# >
# >Funny you should ask, not 15 minutes ago I upgraded to 1.0.3 using
# >such a patch. You want the patches from Jonat
>>Has anyone written a patch for Qmail 1.0.3 to reject mail if envelope sender
>>domain can't be resolved?
>
>Funny you should ask, not 15 minutes ago I upgraded to 1.0.3 using
>such a patch. You want the patches from Jonathan Bradshaw mentioned
>on www.qmail.org.
I've been using them, and they
UNSUBSCRIBE !!
I just searched thorugh the archive looking for the
>Has anyone written a patch for Qmail 1.0.3 to reject mail if envelope sender
>domain can't be resolved?
Funny you should ask, not 15 minutes ago I upgraded to 1.0.3 using
such a patch. You want the patches from Jonathan Bradshaw mention
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 07:33:07PM -0500, MountaiNet Tech Support wrote:
> I have a few users who I was using /etc/aliases for under sendmail and need
> to know how to do those on my qmail system. I seen that I could use my
> existing /etc/aliases, but I really didnt wanna do that, wanted to know
Ok, I have it working well now, just one quirk (dunno if it's a bug).
I have my main mail server name in control/me, and no other files except
virtualhosts and rcpthosts.
I have the following .qmail files:
.qmail-domain-root // for domain.com
.qmail-anotherdom-root // for anotherdom.com
Once upon a midnight dreary, Mate Wierdl had spoken clearly:
>I got four messages like these. Can anybody tell me what is going on?
[snip]
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at muncher.math.uic.edu.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>This is a perma
I got four messages like these. Can anybody tell me what is going on?
Mate
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 Feb 1999 23:06:46 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send prog
Howdy!
I'm running qmail 1.03 on a RedHat 5.1 (2.0.34 kernel, glibc) system,
with the vchkpw single-uid package to handle our virtual domains. The
package and qmail are working wonderfully :-)
I'd like to set up a web page to monitor common mail stat's, essentially
"qmHandle -l" and "qmHandle -
I have a few users who I was using /etc/aliases for under sendmail and need
to know how to do those on my qmail system. I seen that I could use my
existing /etc/aliases, but I really didnt wanna do that, wanted to know how
qmail did this by default.thanks again!
Hi,
I've
just installed qmail on RH 5.2.. new to linux, bit of a struggle,
but it
all
seems to work now.
My
real problem is as follows. I'm a freelance consultant
who
is usually "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", but
sometimes needs to
be
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -
when I'm pretending to
be part o
Justin M Streiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Mark Delany wrote:
>> Correct. As long as you run all of your services via tcpserver.
> Too bad similar protection isn't currently available for udp and RPC
> services :-)
Most UDP services run from inetd run with the "wait" o
Eric Dahnke writes:
> Ok have your laugh, but how the hell else is the minute field conserved
> (per what the sending client entered), yet the message arrives with the
> correct local hour.
The Date: header includes the timezone of the sender. The client that
reads the message can use it to cal
Richard Shetron writes:
> Is there anyway to have qmail use badmailfrom on the from line in the
> header?
Yes. Write the code to do it. As a guideline, use my patch,
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/5799/qmail-uce.html
> The spammers are forging the envelopes so the envel
- Eric Dahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| I'm trying to figure out how the time stamping mechanism works for
| messages which propogate the internet. [...]
|
| - The sending e-mail client sets the definitive time stamp in the
| message header (Date:)
Note that a correctly formatted Date: field conta
Has anyone done this? I have a line such as:
Mydomain.com:alias-mydomain
In my virtualusers... then in the ~/alias directory, I have normal
.qmail-mydomain* files. Now I want to setup ezmlm on that domain. Do I
have to make a controlling user besides alias for ezmlm? What I need I
suppose is
>timing out. This time around I found (with strace) that the select call
>in timeoutread and timeoutwrite was counting down to zero, but then it
>was resettting to the original timeout value somehow. So, it would never
>exit! At the moment I have made a hack to fix this, but I really need to
>kno
Finally, we are running qmaiil on all our mail servers, so thanks to
everyone here who has helped me figure stuff out. It's mostly going ok,
and there were no major customer hassles after the switchover. We have
noticed that performance has increased dramatically. We are using
inhouse LDAP patche
From: Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:I do not understand what you are talking about: I am talking about
:From line, not From: header.
The other guy wants badmailfrom to work on the From: line. Not the From:
header (i.e. the From: line in the body of the message) At least that's how
I unders
From: Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:What the original post said does not make much sense: the From line
:*is* the envelope sender's address.
No it's not. If I put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my badmailfrom, I
will still get messages that you send to the qmail list. But
At 04:04 PM 2/23/99 +, Abel Lucano wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, MountaiNet Tech Support wrote:
>
>>
>> I followed his instructions on Configuring Qmail to be a Selective Relay
>> but had problems with one step. The command is:
>> # sed 's/:.*//' < virtualdomains | cat - locals | sort > rcpth
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how the time stamping mechanism works for
messages which propogate the internet. I have been looking for a
tutorial but found none. The archives provided help, and man datetime
did not. I'm in one timezone and my mailserver in another, so have been
able to do some te
From: Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:What the original post said does not make much sense: the From line
:*is* the envelope sender's address.
No it's not. If I put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in my badmailfrom, I
will still get messages that you send to the qmail list. But those messages
will still
>
> Is there anyway to have qmail use badmailfrom on the from line in the
> header? The spammers are forging the envelopes so the envelopes are
> pretty useless these days for filtering.
Nope. qmail-smtpd doesn't look at the address headers.
For this task you'll probabl
Our existing mail server user /var/spool/mail/username for mail storage. I
just installed qmail and use Maildir for delivery. I need a way to move
all of the mail on the existing server to the new one. The current mail
server seperates mail by a From header like this:
>>From [EMA
>
>MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Is there anyway to have qmail use badmailfrom on the from line in the
header? The spammers are forging the envelopes so the envelopes are
pretty useless these days for filtering.
The From line *is* the envelope sender, which is comi
Robert Wojciechowski Jr. wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> - control/defaultdomain
> 127.0.0.1
>
> - control/locals
> localhost
> 127.0.0.1
>
> - control/me
> 127.0.0.1
> Anyways, I am even on the right path to getting this set up correctly?
> I want a dummy server, that is not really a host in and
Hello,
I want to have the following setup: I have a server that I want to not to
have any e-mail setup by default. I just want e-mail for the virtual
domains. In other words, I don't want the users and accounts on my box to
have e-mail by default, only if I allow them to via a virtual domain (
www.qmail.org, read, and becoming informed on the myriad of ways to make
this transition, simply and painlessly.
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, MountaiNet Tech Support wrote:
> Our existing mail server user /var/spool/mail/username for mail storage. I
> just installed qmail and use Maildir for delivery.
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 02:02:35PM -0500, Richard Shetron wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 02:57:19AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > are the messages from the addresses in /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
> > > automatically bounced or do they just go to /dev/null?
> >
> > The sender is re
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 02:01:54PM -0500, MountaiNet Tech Support wrote:
> Our existing mail server user /var/spool/mail/username for mail storage. I
> just installed qmail and use Maildir for delivery. I need a way to move
> all of the mail on the existing server to the new one. The current ma
Our existing mail server user /var/spool/mail/username for mail storage. I
just installed qmail and use Maildir for delivery. I need a way to move
all of the mail on the existing server to the new one. The current mail
server seperates mail by a From header like this:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] T
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, MountaiNet Tech Support wrote:
>
> I followed his instructions on Configuring Qmail to be a Selective Relay
> but had problems with one step. The command is:
> # sed 's/:.*//' < virtualdomains | cat - locals | sort > rcpthosts
> But when I run it, I get:
> bash: virtualdoma
> On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 02:57:19AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > are the messages from the addresses in /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
> > automatically bounced or do they just go to /dev/null?
>
> The sender is rejected at the SMTP level. The sender says:
>
>MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 02:57:19AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> are the messages from the addresses in /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
> automatically bounced or do they just go to /dev/null?
The sender is rejected at the SMTP level. The sender says:
MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and qma
are the messages from the addresses in /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
automatically bounced or do they just go to /dev/null?
I'm not aware where all those spam go.
TIA
--
k e c h i e
"It's now safe to turn off your computer" means computing was unsafe
before it appeared.
>Michael Samuel's
>http://qmail-docs.surfdirect.com.au/docs/qmail-antirelay.html
I followed his instructions on Configuring Qmail to be a Selective Relay
but had problems with one step. The command is:
# sed 's/:.*//' < virtualdomains | cat - locals | sort > rcpthosts
But when I run it, I get:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Hi,
> If an ISP will set me a virtualhost up using qmail, ie all mail for that vh will
> go right to 1 account at ISP`s server,
> I will be fetching the mail via ppp - the [Q] is: were do I read
> about how do I set up my local qmail for it to del
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 01:15:21AM -0800, Russell Evans wrote:
> Is it possible to use Bruce Guenter's QMAILQUEUE to hold sent mail in a
> queue until the user authenticated him or herself via pop. I was thinking a
> program could be called to dump the mail in the queue and send back a
> notificat
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, MountaiNet Tech Support wrote:
> I just finished setting up Qmail for our POP3 and SMTP servers. How can I
> set it up so that only people who are dialed up to us can use us for an
> SMTP server? We have had some problems with people on competitors using us
> for an anonymo
I just finished setting up Qmail for our POP3 and SMTP servers. How can I
set it up so that only people who are dialed up to us can use us for an
SMTP server? We have had some problems with people on competitors using us
for an anonymous relay system. I want it so only people with our IP
addres
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 08:55:43AM -, John Conover wrote:
> There was a message earlier today concerning the machine resources
> required for log files when using tcpserver//var/qmail/bin/splogger.
>
> Shouldn't it be possible for tcpserver to use individual logs per
> service, through anothe
On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 12:25:24AM +0800, Marlon Anthony Abao wrote:
> hello,
> am sure that this has been discussed here a gadzillion times, an i hope
> one more time would not be so bad :)
>
> how does one go about limiting the number of recipients in the 'CC:" /
> "BCC:" fields?
I have the following setup :
A basic virtual domain. Everything goes to
the .qmail-default apart from a few .qmail-users
that redirects the mail to another server.
I am receiving tons of spam on one of those
.qmail-users. Is there any way to delete messages
that are sent to .qmail-user ???
-S
Forgive me if this seems a basic question.
We have a Linux server and use Outlook clients.
>From time to time, it is important to nbe able to telnet in and use PINE to
read mail.
Is there a way for messages that have been sent from the Outlook clients to
have copies kept on the server? That wa
may i even sugest that a good idea would be a log monitor (such as swatch)
that can watch for a message ID and see how many remote addresses it is
being sent to, and alert the admin if it is over $MAXwhatever rcpt's.
i know i have found MANY MANY spammers from just switching VC's to see
tons of r
hello,
am sure that this has been discussed here a gadzillion times, an i hope
one more time would not be so bad :)
how does one go about limiting the number of recipients in the 'CC:" /
"BCC:" fields? i don't want any of my subscribers to spam to the outside
world.
at least thi
Hi.
Does Qmail supports ETRN ? Do you have any link ?
Thank you for your answer and your experiences.
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 04:37:02PM +0100, Victor Regner wrote:
> |bouncesaying "You cannot post to this list" [ "$SENDER"="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> ]
> &user1
> &user2
> etc...
>
> my .qmail-users
>
The problem is that qmail checks the envelope sender, and that is $SENDER.
In your case, the envelope
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 08:55:43AM -, John Conover wrote:
>
> There was a message earlier today concerning the machine resources
> required for log files when using tcpserver//var/qmail/bin/splogger.
>
> Shouldn't it be possible for tcpserver to use individual logs per
> service, through ano
|bouncesaying "You cannot post to this list" [ "$SENDER"="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
]
&user1
&user2
etc...
my .qmail-users
looks like this but I cant mail to the list i just says You cannot post to this
list which is prob what it's supposed to say when you're not allowed to send to
the list.
Any cl
From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:John Conover writes:
: > While were on the subject, does tcpserver have capabilities of dealing
: > effectively with SYN attacks?
:
:It's the kernel which is being attacked in a SYN attack. Therefore,
:Dan's syncookies fix must be implemented in every k
Hi,
If an ISP will set me a virtualhost up using qmail, ie all mail for that vh will
go right to 1 account at ISP`s server,
I will be fetching the mail via ppp - the [Q] is: were do I read
about how do I set up my local qmail for it to deliver mail to different
users in my localhost (there are 60
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 01:22:27PM +0100, Victor Regner wrote:
> I wanna make a one way mailing list. Do I have to install majordomo or
> exmlm or can I just put a line in the .qmail file so that I am the only
> one that can send mail to it?
Put
|bouncesaying "You cannot post to this lis" [ "$SE
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Chris Naden wrote:
> At 02:23 PM 2/23/99 +0100, you wrote:
> >Hi !
> >
> >Is it possible to put wilcards in controls/badmailfrom ?
> If it were possible to do that I'd be supremely grateful.
It *is* possible with the jbuce patch. Along with a number of other
changes... http:/
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Fred Lindberg wrote:
> It may be configuration problem. Look at where /etc/localtime links.
/etc/localtime -> ../usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Central
> I use UTC on the computer and pine puts .. + ( ). Mutt doesn't do
> the "( )" thing. Maybe changing MUAs would help?
Tha
At 02:23 PM 2/23/99 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi !
>
>Is it possible to put wilcards in controls/badmailfrom ?
>
>Like *free*@* ?
>
>I don't think so, but there is maybe a solution.
>Thank you !
>
!!!
If it were possible to do that I'd be supremely grateful.
cHris
John Conover writes:
> While were on the subject, does tcpserver have capabilities of dealing
> effectively with SYN attacks?
It's the kernel which is being attacked in a SYN attack. Therefore,
Dan's syncookies fix must be implemented in every kernel of interest.
http://pobox.com/~djb/proto/sy
Hi !
Is it possible to put wilcards in controls/badmailfrom ?
Like *free*@* ?
I don't think so, but there is maybe a solution.
Thank you !
Dimitri SZAJMAN - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Xon-Xoff.fr
I wanna make a one way mailing list. Do I have to install majordomo or
exmlm or can I just put a line in the .qmail file so that I am the only
one that can send mail to it?
Victor
begin:vcard
n:Regner;Victor
tel;pager:0740-132878
tel;cell:070-4920505
tel;fax:08-6948119
tel;work:08-7023158
x-
> Is it possible for qmail to send acks back to the sender upon reception of
> the mail message? I have heard something about qreceipt but I can't find any
> pointers leading to that.
Read the man page on qreceipt - the two lines below should be fine in your
.qmail file (assuming you use Maildir
At 02:01 PM 2/23/99 +0200, Ãéþñãïò ÊïõëïãéÜííçò3O3t5/I= wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>
>Is it possible for qmail to send acks back to the sender upon reception of
>the mail message? I have heard something about qreceipt but I can't find any
>pointers leading to that.
Do you mean above and beyond "man qrec
At 11:04 AM 2/23/99 +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
>On 22-Feb-99 17:13:13, das wrote something about "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I just couldn't
>help replying to it, thus:
>> I'm running qmail on my little Linux box with a couple of folks using it
>[cut]
>
> And it is in the ORBS list:
>http:
Dear all,
Is it possible for qmail to send acks back to the sender upon reception of
the mail message? I have heard something about qreceipt but I can't find any
pointers leading to that.
Kind regards,
George Koulogiannis
qmail Digest 23 Feb 1999 11:00:01 - Issue 560
Topics (messages 22271 through 22317):
HELP! live server won't accept SMTP
22271 by: Eric Dahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo:
22272 by: Peter Haworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22313 by: "Rok Papez" <[EMA
On 22-Feb-99 17:13:13, das wrote something about "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I just couldn't
help replying to it, thus:
> I'm running qmail on my little Linux box with a couple of folks using it
[cut]
And it is in the ORBS list:
http://www.orbs.org/verify.cgi?address=204.117.27.42>
Dan, please
Rok Papez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I hit reply it tells me that From: and Reply-To: fields differ and
> asks me to what e-mail adress do I want to reply (to mailing list or
> to the author personal mailbox).
> -> Now that's a smart MUA.
Except that it's lying to you.
I know a non-triv
Is it possible to use Bruce Guenter's QMAILQUEUE to hold sent mail in a
queue until the user authenticated him or herself via pop. I was thinking a
program could be called to dump the mail in the queue and send back a
notification to the sender on authorization failure.
Thank you
Russell
On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 01:59:30PM -0300, Eric Dahnke wrote:
> That solved it. We're running Linux kernel 3.0.26, and I'm sure it is protected
> from SYN attacks.
>
While were on the subject, does tcpserver have capabilities of dealing
effectively with SYN attacks?
Thanks,
John
Hello!
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:29:03 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, I understood that (I'm not an idiot, as you may be
>implying).
> BTW, please don't be so arrogant to ask others "Please read
>the post carefuly before replying" [sic]. You win nothing with this
>attitude.
Sor
Hello Mate.
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 22:25:41 -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
>Are not you the reply-to whiz?
Sorry; I'm not a native English speaker. Could you please rephrase your
sentance?
>Now you leave us with the only possibility
>of sending the answer to this FAQ to the list
Ermm.. what FAQ? How
On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 01:59:30PM -0300, Eric Dahnke wrote:
> That solved it. We're running Linux kernel 3.0.26, and I'm sure it is protected
> from SYN attacks.
>
I hope that means kernel 2.0.36, otherwise I'm in another time warp
somewhere! :-)
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EM
There was a message earlier today concerning the machine resources
required for log files when using tcpserver//var/qmail/bin/splogger.
Shouldn't it be possible for tcpserver to use individual logs per
service, through another logging mechanism. Something like:
tcpserver -R -v -x tcp.cdb -u
Howdy, all.
Anyone have a take on why the access time for the
Maildir/cur directory would not be getting updated
specifically on machines using Network Appliance boxen
for disk storage (via NFS) when a user connects to POP
mail?
My take on qmail-pop3d is that it does opendir()/readdir()/
closed
At 01:27 23/02/99 -0500, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Mark Delany wrote:
>
>> At 05:31 23/02/99 -, you wrote:
>> >On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of
>> >service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits
>> >fork() calls to a spe
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Mark Delany wrote:
> At 05:31 23/02/99 -, you wrote:
> >On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of
> >service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits
> >fork() calls to a specified number, and therefore alleviates the
> >situation?
> "md" == Mark Delany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
md> Whilst some inetd implementations have crude forms of DOS
md> protection (initially created for other reasons) I'm not aware of
md> too many that protect against concurrency - most do it by rate.
Heh. If I may take a slight detour to tel
At 05:31 23/02/99 -, you wrote:
>On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of
>service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits
>fork() calls to a specified number, and therefore alleviates the
>situation?
Correct. As long as you run all of your services
John Conover writes:
> On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of
> service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits
> fork() calls to a specified number, and therefore alleviates the
> situation?
Yup.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynw
On http://lwn.net/daily/ptable.html is a description of denial of
service process table attacks. Am I correct that tcpserver limits
fork() calls to a specified number, and therefore alleviates the
situation?
Thanks,
John
--
John Conover, 631 Lamont Ct., Campbell, CA., 95008, U
86 matches
Mail list logo
