I tested the qmail delivery by:
echo to: user | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
then I find a queue in ~user/Maildir/new/
when I add a .forward file under ~user with content:
&someone@localhost
and do the delivery test again :
echo to: user | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
it still have a queue insid
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:56:19 -0400, qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> when I add a .forward file under ~user with content:
> &someone@localhost
> and do the delivery test again : echo to: user |
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
> it still have a queue inside ~user/Maildir/new
> and I go to
Hi
I am running qmail with the use of the supervise scripts and like to flush
the queue immediately. First of all if reseted the Connection Timeout Table
with qmail-tcpok, after that i've sended the ALARM SIGNAL (with "svc -a
qmail-send") to qmail-send. But it doesn't started to send all remote
--- Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Exchange box is firewalled and boarded up and placed behind wallboard
Except you can't do that with an NT box because
you'll need access to reboot it every so many days
and you can't do that remotely out of the box ;).
_
Charles Cazabon wrote:
>
> eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone else seeing similar stuff happening? I'm running qmail-1.03
without
> > any patches under RedHat 6.1 (kernel 2.2.12-20smp)
>
> Linux kernel version 2.2.12 has known bugs in its stack, and has been
> identified as a likely cul
On 09 Aug (10:54), Graham Leggett wrote:
> I'm curious - you seem very anti Linux and particularly anti Redhat (and
> pro BSD, which isn't a bad thing), but I'm wondering why - were you
> bitten by a Redhat server in a former life? :)
>
> Seriously - can you give details?
Linux evolves into a b
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 19:01:06 -0400, qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> ...yes.. you are right, I forgotten to see the dot-qmail now I add
> this line in .qmail
> |dot-forward .forward
> ./Maildir/
U... try this in .qmail:
&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
./Maildir/
like I stated in the first e-mai
Going through the qmail installation instruction is lwq. Section 2.8.3
describes how to remove sendmail. At the end of the section it says I must
create some symlinks for the old sendmail to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail.
However the instructions give locations for sendmail that don't quite work
on
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:44:06AM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
[snip]
> Can anyone tell me which of the many sendmail files on my OpenBSD 2.9 system
> I should remove and which I should symlink to qmail/bin/sendmail?
>
> My system contains the following sendmail files:
>
> /usr/libexe
>From: Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
>
>This one can stay. chmod u-s it for security.
>
> > /usr/bin/sendmail
>
>This one needs to become a symlink.
Ok.
>Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink to
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:02:47PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
[snip]
> >Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
>
> There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too?
Yes.
> > > /usr/share/sendmail
> >
> >This one can stay just fine.
>
> Oops, it's a directory. Should hav
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:02:47PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> >From: Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
> There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too?
yes.
> So what is /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail?
The actual sendmail
At 14:37 09.08.2001 -0400, qmail wrote:
>Q1.) I am setuping with Mandrake 8.0 kernal 2.4.3, how can I remove all
>postfix?
if installed by hand, you would'nt ask
if installed by rpm, rpm --erase
>Q2.) Should I stop all the pop3 and IMAP service in Xinetd?
yes
>Q3.) I should use courier-imap an
I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from my
mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I get a
"connection refused" message.
I've enable telnet in inetd.conf and my /etc/tcp.smtp file looks like this:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
10.:allow,RELA
On 9, Aug, 2001 at 02:06:28PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:02:47PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> [snip]
> > >Are you sure there is nothing in /usr/sbin/sendmail?
> >
> > There is. Missed it. Should it be a symlink too?
On my OpenBSD CURRENT machine there's
Hello.
> Going through the qmail installation instruction is lwq. Section 2.8.3
> describes how to remove sendmail. At the end of the section it says I
> must
> create some symlinks for the old sendmail to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail.
> However the instructions give locations for sendmail that don
hi
I have a running qmail box, with (at this time) only 1 problem: The
qmail-send program write its logs to tty1 and not in the log files. I've
setted qmail up with the use of supervise und multilog (tcpserver). All the
other processes (qmail-pop3d/qmail-smtpd) are putting there logs in the
rig
Follow-up.
> > My system contains the following sendmail files:
> >
> > /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail
> > /usr/bin/sendmail
> > /usr/share/sendmail
You sure about /usr/bin/sendmail ? On my OpenBSD v2.8 it
was /usr/sbin/sendmail
Which results in :-
mv /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail /us
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 12:31:34 +, "Jean-Christian Imbeault"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet
> from my mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is
> listening. But I get a "connection refused" message.
It would appear
>case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
@40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
>I can tell you now that, from
>your ps output, qmail is not running. If it was, there would be a
>tcpserver running as well, listening to port 25 and spawning
>qmail-smtp
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from
> my
> mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I
> get a
> "connection refused" message.
Too vague...you typed what exactly ? Hopefully :-
telnet localhost 25
or
telnet 127.0.0.1 25
> I'
enough anti Microsoft shit and lets get on with life.
Ross
[moved to mutt from Outlook for this listperfer Outlook]
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Adam Nealis wrote:
> --- Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Exchange box is firewalled and boarded up and placed be
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Morten Liebach wrote:
[snip]
> This is news to me, I've been using mailwrapper (e.g. /etc/mailer.conf)
> instead.
> What's so bad about mailwrapper?
It invokes the real sendmail when it gets in any kind of trouble. A
fix for this is in a FreeBSD PR that h
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 01:10:34PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> >case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
>
> @40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
Fix your run file: you've got the letter O in there where you should have the
number 0.
> I
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:54:50AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > > I want to have a strong and fast mail server on redhat 7.1 which is make
> >
> > "strong and fast mail server" and "redhat" in one sentence? Interesting.
>
> I'm curious - you seem very anti Linux an
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 01:10:34PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> >case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
>
> @40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
You got an O ('oh') that should be a 0 ('zero').
Unless your hostname is O ('oh') in which
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 13:10:34 +, "Jean-Christian Imbeault"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> case, tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current and start qmail.
> @40003b728c052b1e1bdc tcpserver: fatal: no IP address for O
Ah, then this is a configuration error. Please put the contents of
/ser
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 21:24:52 -0400, qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Great, it works, I forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] la, but what
> problem I have in setup .forward? I don't have any error message I
> still can't forward the message by dot-forward
What do your logs say? I have tried and
try using a .qmail file.
or if you want to use the .forward files look at:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/incominguser.html#dot-forward
Ross
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:56:19PM -0400, qmail wrote:
> I tested the qmail delivery by:
> echo to: user | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
>
> then I find a que
Got a solution for this; thanks for all your help. The problem was qmail was
unable to deliver mail if the Maildir is stored on AFS.
Andrea mentioned that AFS is very similar to CODA, and the CODA solution is
to use rename() as I was planning on doing. Peter had cautioned that rename
will overwri
Brett Randall wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 21:24:52 -0400, qmail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Great, it works, I forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] la, but what
> > problem I have in setup .forward? I don't have any error message I
> > still can't forward the message by dot-forward
>
> Wh
I suppose that all your users set the same servers (pop, smtp...) in their
mal software
so you use something to reroute each user on the good server which stock his
mailbox.
how do you do that ?
thanx
-Message d'origine-
De : Ross Cooney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : jeudi 9 août 20
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:54:39PM +0100, François Philippo wrote:
> I suppose that all your users set the same servers (pop, smtp...) in their
> mal software
> so you use something to reroute each user on the good server which stock his
> mailbox.
> how do you do that ?
> thanx
I am not sure wha
what does exactly mean clustering with Qmail ?
- 2 servers redondant with a load balancing which accede to the same disk
system
or
- 2 differents servers where each one stock half of mailboxes with a
multiplexor who reroute user request on the good server following LDAP
attribute or a table?
or
-
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:28:42PM +0100, François Philippo wrote:
> where could I find reference about
> hardware sizing for a mail server with qmail, courier. ??
os list:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/orientation.html#os
file systems:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html#filesystems
David Raistrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I admit its rather annoying to only have the option of doing a -prepend
> instead of mapping ala sendmails virtualusertable...
>
> But I find NO equivalent for sendmails genericstable ?!?!?! Is this true?
Who knows? We're not sendmail people. I'v
Wolfgang Pichler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running qmail with the use of the supervise scripts and like to flush
> the queue immediately. First of all if reseted the Connection Timeout Table
> with qmail-tcpok, after that i've sended the ALARM SIGNAL (with "svc -a
> qmail-send") to qmail
Jean-Christian Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from my
> mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I get a
> "connection refused" message.
[...]
> I think qmail is running a ps -ax gives:
>
> 11988
hi list
I want to setup qmail to log all incoming SMTP traffic.
I am using redhat 7.0 qmail 1.03 which was setup with LWQ.
my startup script is:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -
Wolfgang Pichler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a running qmail box, with (at this time) only 1 problem: The
> qmail-send program write its logs to tty1 and not in the log files.
[...]
> my qmail-send rc looks like:
> ---cut---
> #!/bin/sh
>
> exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" qmai
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:04:47PM +0100, François Philippo wrote:
> what does exactly mean clustering with Qmail ?
You mean qmail-ldap, not qmail. Use qmail-ldaps list then. And read
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/ before; at least three times.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http:/
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> But I have messages that are getting stuck in the queue sometimes for
> more than 3 weeks. I have /var/qmail/control/queuelifetime set to
> 345600 (4 days). Anyone have any idea why this is happening?
You broke something. You didn't restart q
Hi,
what could be the reason for such an error message???:
2001-08-09 16:55:10.524490500 new msg 365071
2001-08-09 16:55:10.525218500 info msg 365071: bytes 234 from <> qp 2344 uid 8001
2001-08-09 16:55:10.612899500 starting delivery 7: msg 365071 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-08-09 16:55:10
Chris Hardie writes:
>
> After reading some initial responses to this, I thought it was worth
> asking for clarification: (4) and (5) together would indicate that the
> user wants to use his "ownership" of the slow connection's IP address as a
> source for the mail, but wants to deliver it v
Steve writes:
> 1. Is it possible to list the Qmail server as the primary MX record and
> still forward the mail to its final destination? All my research
> says no, but I need to be certain.
Use smtproutes. It essentially functions as an MX record with
priority -1 (in other words, a strong
Martin Hasenbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> what could be the reason for such an error message???:
[...]
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.618145500 delivery 7: deferral: qmail-remote_crashed./
[...]
> I've patched qmail with a few patches, [...]
There's your answer -- your patches are buggy. Remove t
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 04:59:08PM +0200, Martin Hasenbein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what could be the reason for such an error message???:
>
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.524490500 new msg 365071
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.525218500 info msg 365071: bytes 234 from <> qp 2344 uid 8001
> 2001-08-09 16:55:10.612899500
Hi guys,
I am looking for a solution to remove most of the headers in
a message,
so that the recepient cannot see any info of my internal
network.
Looking thru the archives of this mailing list, I can see
that most ppl would recommend using the
Edward,
I've had problems with qmail-remote hanging - it had nothing to do
with the queue lifetime, but with some code in qmail-remote failing,
possibly due to an O/S bug.
A fix which works for me is to enable socket keep-alives. This will
kill the socket if it has died after abo
Paul Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking for a solution to remove most of the headers in a
> message, so that the recepient cannot see any info of my internal
> network.
Why? Your internal network is firewalled off, right? Futzing with
headers is, in general, a very bad idea.
Wha
i can't believe i'm going to say this... you guys are a bad influence :-)
this is covered in-depth in the lwq/faqs, which you obviously haven't read
- please re-read, comprehend and then re-ask the question
(hint: look for the function of the dot-qmail file)
- hogan
>can .forward remain a cop
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:36:46AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Ross Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > and I guess the answer is:
> > QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
> > NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
> > MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
> > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 11
"Jean-Christian Imbeault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[Mike Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote]
>
>>Another great resource is 'Life With Qmail' at www.lifewithqmail.org.
>
>Got that already. But as I found out it's Linux-centric. I'll be installing
>on OpenBSD and worse for me is that I don't kno
OK... Let me explain this a little bit better and maybe clear some
things up.
1. I've been using unix for about 8 years now and when someone says to
restart a service or proggy after changing a config file, by god that
service or proggy gets restarted, even if it takes a kill -9 or killall
-9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Andrea mentioned that AFS is very similar to CODA, and the CODA
> solution is
> to use rename() as I was planning on doing. Peter had cautioned
> that rename
> will overwrite existing files whereas hard links will not lose
> any existing
> files. Archived d
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK... Let me explain this a little bit better and maybe clear some
> things up.
Okay.
> 2. The only patch on this system is the qmailqueue-patch for the
> qmailscanner.
This can cause qmail-queue to not be run, but not qmail-remote to crash.
> 5.
Ross Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You guess wrong -- that puts "recordio" as the port number for tcpserver
> > to listen on. recordio should go immediately before qmail-smtpd.
[...]
> This it?
Why don't you try it and see? Wouldn't that have been easier than
mailing back to the list
"eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's ridiculous because if qmail-[smtpd] could do the lookup and
>reject for invalid users, I would not have hardly any bounced
>messages.
"It's ridiculous because if pigs had wings, they could fly."
Pigs don't have wings, and qmail-smtpd can't do the lookup
> 3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23 I
> tend to think that it actually arrive at 3:08 on Jul 30 of 2001, that is
> unless qmail is doing something funking with date and time stamps. ;)
But you didn't show the log entry that corresponds to this message. As
a cons
Hi list: I am experiencing the same trouble a few days ago...
My Qmail will accept inbound and deliver to Maildir but not from
LOCALHOST...
Box is openbsd 2.9.
Mails for accounts in my box arrive smooth. But if I try to send FROM
localhost to local ... will not.
Here is the log/long version:
b
dave, all,
> "It's ridiculous because if pigs had wings, they could fly."
>
> Pigs don't have wings, and qmail-smtpd can't do the lookups. You
> either need to stop wishing your pig could fly or trade it for a bird.
>
this comment has the obviously unintended and unfortunate side-effect of
imp
-Original Message-
From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
>> 3. When the queue shows the message arriving on 30 Jul 2001 15:08:23
I
>> tend to think that it actually arrive at 3:08 on Jul 3
Yes, this is a bug. Is Dan going to issue a qmail-1.04?
He was very prompt in issuing qmail-1.03 when a bug was discovered in
qmail-smtpd's handling of a null envelope recipient.
-russ
p.s. Apologies to mycroft. No, I didn't understand his description of
the problem he was trying to solve.
Pav
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:25:12AM -0400, martin wrote:
> Replying to myself...sigh.
>
> I left out 'mailing list'. Obviously there are mentions of ucspi-tcp.
Well, there's no compulsion of the author to do so, now is there?
When I've had a question about any of the ucspi-tcp tools, a Googl
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:31:34PM +, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> I've done the lwq installation. As a test I have tried to telnet from my
> mail server to itself on port 25 to see if qmail is listening. But I get a
> "connection refused" message.
>
> I've enable telnet in inetd.conf a
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 02:34:06PM -0230, Martin Marconcini wrote:
> Hi list: I am experiencing the same trouble a few days ago...
> My Qmail will accept inbound and deliver to Maildir but not from
> LOCALHOST...
> Box is openbsd 2.9.
> Mails for accounts in my box arrive smooth. But if I try to
> >
> > I left out 'mailing list'. Obviously there are mentions of
> ucspi-tcp.
>
> Well, there's no compulsion of the author to do so, now is there?
>
> When I've had a question about any of the ucspi-tcp tools, a Google
> search pretty quickly exposes any number of citations on any numbe
>
> Try talking proper SMTP instead:
>
> 220 megadeth.dnsalias.com ESMTP
> helo megadeth.dnsalias.com
> 250 megadeth.dnsalias.com
> mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 250 ok
> rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 250 ok
> data
> 354 go ahead
> Subject: Whatever
>
> Whatever
> .
> 250 ok 997364882 qp 2354
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:15:38PM -0230, Martin Marconcini wrote:
> >
> > Try talking proper SMTP instead:
> >
> > 220 megadeth.dnsalias.com ESMTP
> > helo megadeth.dnsalias.com
> > 250 megadeth.dnsalias.com
> > mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 250 ok
> > rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 250 ok
> If you don't put From and To headers in your message, there won't be
any
> From
> and To headers in your message. What appears in these headers has
nothing
> to do
> with the SMTP MAIL FROM and RCPT TO commands.
Now a question...
Why I usually do a telnet xxx 25 and send a mail like I did and I
Todd Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>dave, all,
>
>> "It's ridiculous because if pigs had wings, they could fly."
>>
>> Pigs don't have wings, and qmail-smtpd can't do the lookups. You
>> either need to stop wishing your pig could fly or trade it for a bird.
>>
>
>this comment has the obv
henning, all,
> > > It's a matter of fact that qmail isn't as reliable on Linux as on *BSD as it
> > > relies on some FFS semantics ext2fs just doen not fulfill.
> > If that is the case then there is a bug in qmail - the software should
> > be correct to the system underneath it, not apply semant
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:39:28PM -0500, Edward McLain allegedly wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MarkD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: qmail-queue question
>
> >> 3. When the queue shows the message a
Martin Marconcini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mails for accounts in my box arrive smooth. But if I try to send FROM
> localhost to local ... will not.
[...]
> @40003b72949c101d82dc new msg 165132
> @40003b72949c10372174 info msg 165132: bytes 182 from <> qp 23545
> uid 2850
> @4000
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not to start anything else, but is there any better way to stop qmail
> when using tcp-daemonts than svc -d /service/qmail-send ?
No -- that is the proper way to stop qmail with daemontools.
> This doesn't seem to always work [...]
Nope -- it alway
Martin Marconcini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Try talking proper SMTP instead:
> >
> > 220 megadeth.dnsalias.com ESMTP
> > helo megadeth.dnsalias.com
> > 250 megadeth.dnsalias.com
> > mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 250 ok
> > rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> This way it worked... h
I don't know if this is a good place for these questions, sorry if it =
isn't
1. I'm using daemontools .70. I would like to upgrade to .76. I =
believe I should
stop qmail first, right...?
2. Do I need to hunt down and remove the old svscan. It's in =
/usr/local/bin now.
I know the new one in
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 02:33:45PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> Pigs are fairly intelligent[1], as anyone who knows farm animals will
> tell you. Birds, on the other hand, are notoriously dim ("bird brain",
> for example).
That's not very accurate. I keep birds (specifically, parrots) as pets, and
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 03:26:16PM -0230, Martin Marconcini wrote:
> > If you don't put From and To headers in your message, there won't be
> any
> > From
> > and To headers in your message. What appears in these headers has
> nothing
> > to do
> > with the SMTP MAIL FROM and RCPT TO commands.
>
Ok.. after searching through the logs for a bit, I have discovered the
following about some of the messages getting stuck in the queue..
This is the method I used to do this test, if it's wrong tell me, but
this is what I did. First off I ran:
[root@mail qmail]# ps ax | grep qmail-remote | wc -
John Logiudice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. I'm using daemontools .70. I would like to upgrade to .76.
[...]
> 4. Should I even bother upgrading?
Not unless v.0.76 provides some new feature that you need, or fixes some
bug in v.0.70 which you cannot work around.
Don't futz with a working
> Ok.. so as someone pointed out I have to now search by the deliver
> number.. So I ran:
>
> [root@mail send]# grep "delivery 366" * | /usr/local/bin/tai64nlocal
> 2001-08-09 13:41:28.533103500.s:@40003b72c36a2839ff1c starting
> delivery 366: msg 112603 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [ro
Hi,
I've found the qmail-1.03-version of Maex's
outgoingip.patch on the net. I patched my qmail
and it compiled without any errors. When I
first tried to send out an eMail, my logs said:
qmail-remote crashed
As soon as I added the file outgoingip, qmail worked
properly. Did anyone has the same
Edward McLain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok.. so qmail-remote crashed.. but why?
Who knows? Did you kill it?
> It had also been running for over 3 hours?
So? Long messages to a slow host can do this.
> Well to test it out I did the following:
[...]
You didn't use proper SMTP syntax, w
Martin Hasenbein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I patched my qmail and it compiled without any errors. When I first
> tried to send out an eMail, my logs said:
>
> qmail-remote crashed
[...]
> Is there an error in the patch?
Yes.
Charles
--
-
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:47:44PM +0800, Paul Tan wrote:
> I am looking for a solution to remove most of the headers in a message, so
> that the recepient cannot see any info of my internal network.
If you're using tcpserver (and if you're not, you should be), see:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?
Hi,
ps ax | grep qmail-remote
shows the running processes that are currently sending message, each
process
is a message been sent, ok?
ps ax | grep qmail-smtpd
show the running processes that are currently arriving, right? But it
shows:
1016 ?S 4:30
/usr/local/bin/tcpse
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Yes, this is a bug.
Surprised? :)
> Is Dan going to issue a qmail-1.04?
Well, he could probably address other issues as well, e.g. a latent
problem with the interpretation of program return codes (summarized in my
posting titled "qmail vs ld.so & exe
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 22:46:27 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> 1016 ?S 4:30
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -uQMAILDUID -gNOFILESGID 0 smtp
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> 15498 ?S 0:44 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> 19168 ?S 0:00
> /usr/local/bin/tc
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:46:27PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ps ax | grep qmail-remote
>
> shows the running processes that are currently sending message, each process
> is a message been sent, ok?
Right.
> ps ax | grep qmail-smtpd
>
> show the running processes that are curren
Hi all!
I have just installed the qmailanalog 0.70 binary for openbsd.
I've noticed that there doesn't appear to be alot of information on
qmailanalog. atm I'm having problems with getting started.I use
multilog on my qmail system. Would someone be kind enough to offer some
start
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 01:58:41PM -0400, Dan Melomedman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> > Really have a look at the sources. You'll see the difference very fast.
> > There are strong rules for code on OpenBSD, style(9) is just a tiny excerpt.
> > Th
Hello Gareth.
> Hi all!
>
> I have just installed the qmailanalog 0.70 binary for openbsd.
> I've noticed that there doesn't appear to be alot of information on
> qmailanalog. atm I'm having problems with getting started.I use
> multilog on my qmail system. Would someone be kind e
Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 22:46:27 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > 1016 ?S 4:30
> > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -uQMAILDUID -gNOFILESGID 0 smtp
> > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> > 15498 ?S 0:44 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smt
I've fixed up the tcpserver, thanks!
So each qmail-remote is a message going out and each qmail-smtpd without
tcpserver is a message arriving.
Thanks,
Ari
Hi,
Is there some tool to check online qmail log, like messages arriving
and
going out with output to browser?
Thanks,
Ari
Now I've change the variable, -uQMAILDUID -gNOFILESGID to -u$QMAILDUID
-g$NOFILESGI and restarted qmail, but sometimes I can it twice processes
of:
2173 pts/0S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -u401 -g400 0
smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
2714 pts/0S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tc
After finally getting qmail to work last night and at the suggestion of some
posters I've decided to re-do my installation. I've re-installed the OS
(OpendBSD 2.9) and started from scratch again, trying to follow lwq as
closely as possible.
I'm at the daemontools install step and have a suspic
François,
> what does exactly mean clustering with Qmail ?
>
> - 2 servers redondant with a load balancing which accede to the same disk
> system
> or
> - 2 differents servers where each one stock half of mailboxes with a
> multiplexor who reroute user request on the good server following LDAP
>
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 11:17:14AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Ross Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > You guess wrong -- that puts "recordio" as the port number for tcpserver
> > > to listen on. recordio should go immediately before qmail-smtpd.
> [...]
> > This it?
>
> Why don't y
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
